9/16/2014 River-linking: bad science or good economics?

| Business Line
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/riverlinking-bad-science-or-good-economics/article6413514.ece?css=print 1/2
River-linking: bad science or good economics?
AM JIGEESH
IIFL Free Trading Account - Zero Opening Charges, Easy to Use Platform & Low Brokerage Charges!
indiainfoline.com/Open-an-Account
India's ambitious project remains divided between those who believe in its potential to generate power and provide
irrigation and those who warn about its ecological consequences, says AM Jigeesh.
Atalji's dream of linking rivers is our dream as well. This can strengthen the efforts of our hardworking farmers,
tweeted Narendra Modi soon after an election campaign speech in Bihar in April.
The river linking project, which the National Water Development Agency (NWDA) calls inter-basin transfer of water, is
designed to ease water shortages in western and southern India, while mitigating the impact of recurrent floods in the
eastern parts of the Ganga basin.
One of the most effective ways to increase the irrigation potential to improve foodgrain production, mitigate floods
and droughts and reduce regional imbalances in the availability of water is the Inter Basin Water Transfer from surplus
rivers to deficit areas. The Brahmaputra and the Ganga, particularly their northern tributaries; the Mahanadi, the
Godavari, and the west-flowing rivers originating from the Western Ghats are found to be surplus in water resources,
NWDA says on its Website.
At its completion, the country will have 30 river links, 3,000 storage structures, a canal network stretching almost
15,000 km and can generate 34 GW of hydroelectric power, create some 87 million acres of irrigated land, and transfer
174 trillion litres of water a year. The initial cost of the project is estimated to be at 5.6 lakh crore, while around
580,000 people face the threat of displacement.
The plan
Under the National Perspective Plan (NPP) prepared by the Ministry of Water Resources, the NWDA has identified 14
links under the Himalayan Component and 16 links under the Peninsular Rivers Component. Out of these, feasibility
reports for 14 links under the Peninsular Component and two links under the Himalayan Component have been
prepared.
According to the NPP, the Himalayan Rivers Development Project envisages construction of storage reservoirs on the
main Ganga and the Brahmaputra and their principal tributaries in India and Nepal, along with an inter-linking canal
system to transfer surplus flow of the eastern tributaries of the Ganga to the West. It will also link the main
Brahmaputra with the Ganga.
The Peninsular Rivers Development Component is divided into four major parts: interlinking of Mahanadi-Godavari-
Krishna-Cauvery rivers and building storages at potential sites in these basins, interlinking West-flowing rivers north
of Mumbai and south of the Tapi, interlinking of Ken-Chambal, and diversion of other West-flowing rivers.
Bringing States on board
To implement the project successfully, the Government will have to convince States to come on board, as water is a
State subject.
Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Puducherry, Rajasthan,
Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh are the major States to benefit from the project. Several States have supported the plan,
while some others have raised concerns. Chief Ministers of both Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu have been urging the
Centre to take up the 14 links under the peninsular component. Kerala, however, is worried about the proposed Pamba-
Achankovil-Vaippar link.
The Hindu, Chennai
A view of the Netravathi river near Valachil in Mangalore. H.S.MANJUNATH
9/16/2014 River-linking: bad science or good economics? | Business Line
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/riverlinking-bad-science-or-good-economics/article6413514.ece?css=print 2/2
The first steps
One of the initial tasks before the Government is to address the Supreme Court verdict of February 2014 on the
interlinking of rivers. The court had directed the Government to create an appropriate body to plan, construct, and
implement the massive project, starting with the Ken-Betwa link.
The two phases of the Ken-Betwa link project, involving Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, are estimated to cost
11,676 crore. A detailed project report for both the phases has been submitted to the two State Governments.
According to this report, a total of 11,723 ha of land could be submerged if this project is executed. This includes more
than 5,000 ha of forest land belonging to the Panna Tiger Reserve. It will also affect 10,163 people belonging to 2,529
families in 22 villages.
Together, both the phases of the Ken-Betwa Link project envisage 7.35 lakh ha of irrigation, 78 MW of hydropower
and would provide drinking water to 15.07 lakh people, said S Masood Husain, Director-General, NWDA. Other
priority links are Parbati-Kalisindh-Chambal, Damanganga-Pinjal, Par-Tapi-Narmada, and Godavari (Polavaram)-
Krishna (Vijayawada).
Of these, the detailed report for the Damanganga-Pinjal link is ready with the Centre. The report has already been
submitted to the Governments of Maharashtra and Gujarat. If implemented, this project can address Mumbais water
problem to a great extent at least till 2040, Husain added.
The downside to linking
However, the projects have already invited criticism from various political parties. In fact, those who were evicted for
the construction of the Bhakra and the Pong dams, two of the oldest in India, have still not been fully rehabilitated.
Environmentalists, hydrologists and economists around the world have expressed deep concerns at the irreversible
damage that this sort of a mega project can do to the countrys environment and our water resources. Massive civil
works will be involved, lakhs of people will be uprooted and vast sums of money will be required, Congress leader and
MP Karan Singh said.
The CPI (M) has also questioned the move. The partys MP KN Balagopal said the Central Governments plan is
politically-motivated, giving the example of theParambikkulam-Aliayar project (in Kerala). Farmers of Palakkad
district have to hold protests during the crop season to get water from the project released. The proposed Pamba-
Achankovil-Vaippar link will be a disaster for a riparian zone like Kerala, he says.
Failed attempts
The Government defends the project, saying the idea of river-linking is not new in India. In 1972, then Union Irrigation
Minister KL Rao mooted the first major proposal to interlink the water basins. The 2,640-km-long Ganga-Cauvery link
was the main component in the proposal. But Raos estimate of 12,500 crore was considered grossly under-estimated
and economically prohibitive. In 1977, during the Moraji Desai Government, Captain Dinshaw J Dastur, an engineer,
proposed the construction of two canals the first for the Himalayan rivers and the second to cover the central and
southern parts. A host of experts opined that his project was infeasible.
However, both the Government and the NWDA are now confident of implementing the project at the national level.
The NWDA lists a number of initiatives such as the Periyar Project, the Parambikulam-Aliyar, Kurnool-Cudappah
Canal, the Telugu Ganga Project, and the Ravi-Beas-Sutlej-Indira Gandhi Nahar Project as examples of successful
execution of river linking.
If we can build storage reservoirs on these (surplus) rivers and connect them to other parts of the country, regional
imbalances could be reduced significantly and lot of benefits by way of additional irrigation, domestic and industrial
water supply, hydropower generation, and navigational facilities would accrue, it adds.
(This article was published on September 15, 2014)
Printable version | Sep 16, 2014 4:47:34 PM | http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/riverlinking-bad-science-or-good-economics/article6413514.ece
The Hindu Business Line