You are on page 1of 20

http://pus.sagepub.

com/
Public Understanding of Science
http://pus.sagepub.com/content/21/6/705
The online version of this article can be found at:

DOI: 10.1177/0963662510389977
2012 21: 705 originally published online 5 December 2010 Public Understanding of Science
Stephen Bocking
context of environmental controversy
Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the

Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at: Public Understanding of Science Additional services and information for

http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts:

http://pus.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:

http://pus.sagepub.com/content/21/6/705.refs.html Citations:

What is This?

- Dec 5, 2010 OnlineFirst Version of Record

- Jul 19, 2012 Version of Record >>


at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Corresponding author:
Stephen Bocking, Environmental and Resource Studies Program, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, K9J7B8, Canada
Email: sbocking@trentu.ca
Public Understanding of Science
21(6) 705723
The Author(s) 2010
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0963662510389977
pus.sagepub.com
Article
P U S
Mobile knowledge and the media:
The movement of scientific
information in the context of
environmental controversy
Stephen Bocking
Trent University, Canada
Abstract
This paper examines the role of the news media in transnational flows of knowledge. Its focus is on salmon
aquaculture, an industry operating in Europe, Canada, and elsewhere. To examine the movement of knowledge
from Europe to Canada, a sample of 323 news stories mentioning European aquaculture was drawn from
1261 stories about aquaculture published in Canadian newspapers between 1982 and 2007. Their analysis
demonstrates the role of the media in selectively moving and shaping scientific knowledge. This role has been
influenced by numerous factors, including journalistic norms, source strategies, and the assertion of trust,
relevance and scientific credibility. This analysis corrects the common assumption in the internet era that
information flows freely: new technology has not obviated the role of social factors. The medias role in the
movement of knowledge also has implications for the geography of science, and for the status of science as
a situated practice.
Keywords
globalization of science and technology, media and science, media representations, movement of knowledge,
science communication, scientific controversies
1. Science, controversy, and the media
This article examines the role of the news media in the movement of environmental knowledge, in
the assertion of claims regarding the relevance and credibility of this knowledge, and in the con-
struction of science as a situated practice. Its point of departure is awareness of the media as a
principal means by which policy-relevant issues and information come to the attention of decision
makers, interest groups, and the general public (Corbett and Durfee, 2004; Major and Atwood,
2004; Antilla, 2005; Carvalho, 2007). This encompasses the medias important role in disseminating
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
706 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
scientific information in the context of environmental controversies, one result of which is that the
public tends to understand the science that relates to these controversies less through direct expe-
rience or past education than through the filter of journalistic language and imagery (Nelkin,
1995: 2). Many factors influence the scale and character of media coverage of science and environ-
mental controversies, including current events, competing economic priorities, newsworthiness,
and perceptions of the credibility and trustworthiness of sources. The professional culture of jour-
nalism and its attendant conventions and norms are also important, including the assurance of bal-
ance through presentation of opposing views, and attention to the everyday culture of media
audiences (Peters, 1995).
Media coverage of science can also be examined in terms of how information is framed.
Frames that is, interpretative schemes that imply particular approaches to problems, their causal
relationships, and potential solutions are an essential tool for understanding how the media
define an issue (Scheufele, 1999, 2000; Nisbet et al., 2003; Antilla, 2005; Scheufele and
Lewenstein, 2005; Corbett, 2006; Carvalho, 2007; Scheufele and Tewksbury, 2007; Matthes and
Kohring, 2008). Framing an issue involves not just presenting, but explaining information: why
it is important, who might be responsible, and what might be done about it. For journalists, frames
are a means of presenting and interpreting information efficiently; for audiences, they are simi-
larly important in understanding new information and relating it to already accepted knowledge.
For example, the media have framed biotechnology as, alternatively, a means of achieving food
security or economic growth through science, as a matter demanding political and ethical reflec-
tion, or as a Pandoras Box of uncertain hazards and corporate control over agriculture (Nisbet
and Lewenstein, 2002).
How the media frame information is also relevant to understanding the presentation of science.
As researchers have noted, the media do not present merely scientific knowledge, but also ideas
regarding the practice of science (Gregory and Miller, 1998: 90). This reflects not only curiosity
about what scientists do, but concerns regarding science in its social context: skepticism regarding
the relations between science and political or economic interests; demands for guidance in evaluat-
ing the credibility and trustworthiness of science and scientists, or in understanding the meaning of
controversies between scientists; and a lack of clarity regarding scientific uncertainties such as
those encountered in relation to climate change (Zehr, 2000; Mooney, 2005; Carvalho, 2007;
Weingart, 2007; McGarity and Wagner, 2008; Michaels, 2008). One consequence has been the
emergence of an image of science as less a pathway to objective truth, than a social institution akin
to that described by historians and sociologists of science, in which scientific practice and knowl-
edge are shaped by the diverse values, interests, and ideologies of its practitioners, patrons, and
audiences in short, a view of knowledge as a contingent phenomenon.
Scholars have also described how contemporary science is constructed in many sites beyond
laboratories and scientific journals. In particular, when science has consequences for actors beyond
the scientific community as in environmental controversies, for example scientists do not act
independently in specifying aspects of their practice such as choice of methods or the weighing of
uncertainties (Irwin and Wynne, 1996; Fischer, 2004). Instead, these are negotiated through social
relationships between scientists, policy actors, interest groups, and the general public. The media,
in turn, play an important role in mediating and framing these negotiations, and thus, do not merely
report on science as social and contingent, but contribute to constructing this identity (Allan, 2002).
While scholars have contributed a great deal to understanding agenda setting, framing, and the
social construction of science in the context of controversy, other important aspects of contempo-
rary sciencemedia relations have received less attention. One such aspect is the representation of
science as a situated practice.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 707
2. Situated science and the media
In recent years there has been increasing interest in understanding science as a situated practice
that is, as a phenomenon that does not exist independently of space, but can be located, and has a
geography. Two aspects have been especially important. One is the significance of local sites of
knowledge production, encompassing the influence of political and social contexts, institutions,
disciplines, and local environments (Shapin, 1998; Barnes, 2004; Kohler, 2006). A second has been
how local knowledge gains the capacity to travel beyond the site of its production, so that it may
be considered of general, even universal, authority. As several scholars have explained, this author-
ity must be asserted, not just assumed. Study of the movement of knowledge, and of the contested
and ambiguous boundaries between global and local knowledge, has encompassed political and
economic structures, such as the relations between colonies and centers of empire, and the role of
international conservation organizations in local environments (Kirsch, 2000; Livingstone, 2003;
Jasanoff and Martello, 2004; Powell, 2007; Anderson and Adams, 2008).
The political and economic implications of science as a situated practice have also attracted
attention, motivated by awareness that accompanying the status of sites as centers of knowledge
production is the potential for extension of these centers social and conceptual control over local
places. The relations between science and control have been critically examined in a variety of
contexts: environmental justice and the geographies of race, poverty, and hazards; imposition of
local conceptions of nature (such as that of wilderness) that become defined as universal; and
redefinition of global issues such as climate change in terms of a specific authoritative local per-
spective (Guha, 1997; Jamieson, 2001; Lewis, 2007). In a less critical vein, science policy analysts
have applied ideas of situated science to economic innovation, examining the geography of scien-
tific practice and application, with notions of research clusters (often defined in terms of an eco-
nomic sector rather than a scientific discipline) displacing assumptions of an homogeneous
landscape of scientific activity (Niosi, 2005).
The concepts of situated science and its constructed capacity to be mobile imply a research
agenda, with several questions specific to understanding science and the media. One is the role of
the media in mediating the relations between science and place, through their portrayals of the
links between knowledge and local circumstances. A second relates to the movement of knowledge
through the media: through displacement of individuals or texts, the formation of networks, or by
other means. A third question relates to the contestation in the context of controversy of the capac-
ity of knowledge to be mobile, expressed in terms of the role of the media in shaping perceptions
of the credibility of knowledge beyond the context of its formation, and of the potential for conflict
between mobile knowledge and local conditions and forms of knowledge.
The implications for the news media of globalization, including the role of communication tech-
nologies, have been an active area of research (Campbell, 2004; Flew, 2007). These studies have
drawn to some extent on the work of globalization scholars such as Arjun Appadurai and Saskia
Sassen, who have emphasized the deterritorialization of proximity, undermining the notion of clearly
defined spatial hierarchies such as local, national, and global. Instead, multiple, often overlapping
spatialities, defined in terms of the flows of, for example, capital, information, or people, together
define the diverse and sometimes unexpected proximities that link geographically disparate sites.
This perspective acknowledges the importance of global flows, while respecting the local circum-
stances that shape how these are expressed and experienced (Appadurai, 1996; Sassen, 2000).
However, and not withstanding these studies of the implications of globalization, there have
been few studies of the media in terms of situated science, the mobility of information, and multi-
ple spatialities. Indeed, with the exception of the role of geographic proximity in evaluations of
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
708 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
newsworthiness (that is, the effort to find local angles in national or international stories, and the
tendency to weigh the importance of events in terms of their proximity), media studies have tended
to neglect geographical dimensions of scientific knowledge and practice (Priest, 2001; Grke and
Ruhrmann, 2003; Sachsman et al., 2004). Yet, given the role of the media in constructing scientific
knowledge and practice, it can be hypothesized that the media also contribute to the formation of
science as a situated practice, and to the assertion of its capacity to be mobile, with this capacity
linked to evaluations of trustworthiness and credibility. Opportunities for evaluating this hypothe-
sis are provided by scientific activities and related controversies that are themselves situated in
specific places, with the relevance and credibility of evidence from elsewhere a matter of debate.
These conditions are fulfilled by recent controversies relating to salmon aquaculture: an industry
and associated scientific activity that are located in specific places, and yet also form international
networks of knowledge and practice.
3. Geographies of salmon aquaculture
Salmon aquaculture the raising of salmon in enclosed net-pens, also known as salmon farming
has emerged in recent years as a significant coastal industry. First established in Norway in the
early 1970s, it is now also practiced in Chile, Scotland, Ireland, and British Columbia, Canada (the
focus of this study), with smaller initiatives under way in New Brunswick, Maine, and Washington
State. Since 1999 global production of farmed salmon has exceeded that of the conventional
salmon fishery (Eagle et al., 2004). In British Columbia the industry has grown rapidly since the
late 1980s (see Table 1).
The industry has also generated considerable controversy. In British Columbia the provincial
government and the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans have devoted political, eco-
nomic, and intellectual capital to encouraging its growth; industry associations and aquaculture
companies themselves actively promote it. Salmon aquaculture has also generated considerable
opposition among environmental groups, salmon fishers, and in many coastal communities
(Schreiber, 2003; Hume et al., 2004; Naylor and Burke, 2005; Robson, 2006). Their concerns
stem from a variety of environmental issues: the release of contaminants, the ecological impacts
of escaped salmon, and the role of farms in encouraging the spread of sea lice a parasite that
affects both farmed and wild salmon (Gardner and Peterson, 2003; Naylor et al., 2003; Hites
et al., 2004; Weir and Grant, 2005). Critics have also raised more general concerns regarding the
industrys social and cultural implications concerns linked to the iconic status of salmon in
coastal identity (Schreiber, 2002).
The spatial dimensions of this industry are complex and continue to evolve. International invest-
ment and ownership have become increasingly significant. While the industry in British Columbia
was in part initiated by fishers and other local actors, currently four multinational corporations,
most headquartered in Norway, own 80 percent of the roughly 100 farms in the province. These
corporations also endeavor to present themselves as local businesses. Complex spatial dimen-
sions are also exemplified by the role of the global salmon market in determining the local viability
of aquaculture, even as it demands a standardized product that eschews local variation. Farmed
salmon also compete in the marketplace with a wild salmon fishery that identifies itself closely
with place. International flows of biological material: breeding stock of Atlantic salmon (now the
dominant species raised in British Columbia, but characterized by many as an exotic invasive spe-
cies), fish feed (much of which is derived from fish caught elsewhere in the world), and the product
itself, add their own complexities to these spatial dimensions.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 709
Another international dimension of salmon aquaculture has been a scientific research effort
pursuing both technical innovations and a better understanding of the industrys environmental and
health implications. Through this effort, scientific knowledge of aquaculture has acquired its own
geography. For example, aspects of the environmental implications of aquaculture about which a
firm consensus has been achieved in Europe, such as the implications of sea lice, have been simul-
taneously the focus of active research and controversy in Canada (Mills, 2003; Krkosek et al.,
2007). These and other aspects of the geography of aquaculture knowledge have created conditions
in which the relevance and credibility of information from elsewhere could be contested.
Overall, therefore, questions of place, space, and the movement of knowledge have been
endemic in salmon aquaculture, with science heavily implicated in these questions. It can be
hypothesized, given the publics lack of direct experience with aquaculture outside the local
region, that the media would play an important role in framing these questions and in defining
the relevance and credibility of information from elsewhere. This is particularly likely in
British Columbia, where aquaculture (and accompanying controversies) have received ample
media coverage, with contested scientific information regarding the environmental implica-
tions of aquaculture forming a major element of this coverage. Various parties have sought to
ensure that this coverage presents the industry in ways consistent with their own values and
interests. These efforts have interacted with other factors that shape media coverage, including
external events, the political and ideological environment, media views regarding the news-
worthiness of an issue and its framing, and perceptions of the geography of the industry and
of its knowledge base.
4. Scope of the study
This analysis will focus on several research questions. Together they address aspects of the com-
munication of scientific and other types of information by the media in the context of salmon
aquaculture controversies in British Columbia. One is the role of the media in the movement of
information in this case, from European sites of salmon aquaculture to Canada. This implies two
subsidiary areas of inquiry: the evaluation and representation by the media of the relevance of
European information to local aquaculture issues in Canada; and the means and formats by which
information is conveyed by the media from Europe to Canada. A second aspect is the relation
between this movement of information and the role of the media in defining and framing the public
agenda regarding aquaculture. A third is the role of the media in the construction of the situated
nature of aquaculture science and the geographic dimensions of aquaculture.
The study begins with a quantitative analysis designed to identify temporal patterns in mentions
of European salmon aquaculture by the Canadian media. This analysis examines both scientific
and other forms of information, and so provides necessary context for examining the movement of
scientific information from Europe to Canada. The hypothesis is that coverage in the Canadian
media of European salmon aquaculture corresponds, at least in part, to its perceived relevance to
the development of the domestic aquaculture industry and associated controversies. Accordingly,
the following question is posed:
Research Question 1: How do temporal patterns in Canadian media attention to European
salmon aquaculture relate to the domestic development of the aquaculture industry and related
controversies? This question will be examined in relation to the timeline summarizing salient
aspects of the history of salmon aquaculture in British Columbia (Table 1).
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
710 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
It is also of interest to consider not just what, but how knowledge travels between Europe and
Canada that is, the mechanisms by which information is transferred between these locations.
Much has been made of the role of the internet in global communications. However, effective com-
munication is not just a matter of technology, but depends on social factors such as evaluations of
relevance, credibility, and trust. This implies the continuing importance of mediators, such as the
media. The following questions address this argument:
Research Question 2: By what means do the media transport information relating to salmon
aquaculture between Europe and Canada?
Research Question 3: How can this transport of information be understood in terms of media
conventions regarding the formation of relationships of trust and credibility?
Having considered how European knowledge is conveyed to Canadian audiences, we shift our
attention to the framing of this knowledge in relation to the local context. Accordingly, an addi-
tional research question concerns the themes and frames employed by the media to explain and
justify links between aquaculture in Europe and in British Columbia:
Research Question 4: How have the media framed for Canadian audiences their coverage of
the environmental dimensions of European aquaculture?
Through attention to these research questions, it will be demonstrated that the movement of
scientific knowledge is not simply the inevitable consequence of global networks of communica-
tion, but an actively constructed phenomenon, shaped by media practices and conventions, and by
the interests that seek to use this knowledge in pursuit of their goals. In this way the media contrib-
ute to the construction of science as a situated practice, taking place at local sites of knowledge
production, communication, and application.
5. Methods
These research questions will be examined through quantitative and qualitative analysis of
texts from Canadian newspapers from 1982 to 2007. Data collection and analysis were con-
ducted in several stages. First, a collection of media articles on salmon aquaculture was
assembled using several Canadian databases of newspapers and magazines. Databases were
searched for records created between 1982 and 2007. The choice of 1982 as the start point was
in response to two considerations: coverage provided by these databases (Canadian Newsstand,
1977+; Alt-Press Watch, 1970+; CBCA Current Events, 1982+), and knowledge of the history
of the industry. Articles had to contain the search term salmon, and at least one of science,
aquaculture, or salmon farming. This generated a collection of 2429 media texts. These
were then logged in Zotero, an online citation and bibliographic tool that operates within the
Firefox internet browser (www.zotero.org). Zotero captured citation/bibliographic informa-
tion and the full text of each article. The database thus became available for full-text searching
and cross-referencing. Finally, all texts logged in Zotero were reviewed manually, and texts
lacking mention of aquaculture were removed. This generated a database of 1261 texts, which
became the basis for analysis.
In the second stage, a subset of this database was constructed, composed of all media texts that
contained a mention of salmon aquaculture in Europe. The database was searched using the search
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 711
terms Europe, Norway, Scotland, or Ireland. These search results were then screened to
remove duplicate stories and those of media other than newspapers. This generated a subset of 323
texts that included some mention of European aquaculture.
Table 1. Events in the history of British Columbia (BC) aquaculture, Canadian media coverage, and
European aquaculture.
Year Events in British Columbia Canadian media coverage
of European aquaculture
Events in Europe
1975 early 1970s: small-scale aquaculture
initiatives begin in BC
19751979: observation of
Gyrodactylus parasite in
Norwegian rivers
1980 1984: annual BC farmed salmon
production 107 tonnes
early 1980s: Gyrodactylus
control efforts in Norway
mid-1980s: conflicts in BC between
aquaculture and other marine
activities; concerns regarding disease
transfer, waste discharges, impacts on
marine mammals
mid-1980s: economic
dimensions dominate
coverage
mid-1980s: start of substantial
European (mainly Norwegian)
investment in BC aquaculture
late 1980s: BC aquaculture industry
adopts Atlantic salmon as primary
species, displacing Pacific salmon
late 1980s: disease
dominates coverage of
environmental aspects
1988: annual BC farmed salmon
production 6600 tonnes
1990 19881992: BC aquaculture industry
crisis and consolidation
early 1990s: little coverage
of environmental aspects
late 1980searly 1990s: sea
lice infestations found in sea
trout in Ireland, Scotland,
Norway
1991: annual BC farmed salmon
production 24,000 tonnes
mid-1990s: evidence of colonization
of BC environment by escaped
Atlantic salmon
mid-1990s: European
scientists identify farms as
source of sea lice affecting
sea trout
1995: moratorium on new salmon
farm sites in BC
late 1990s: disease and
Atlantic salmon dominate
coverage of environmental
aspects
1997: BC Salmon Aquaculture
Review released
2000 2000: evidence of contaminants in
farmed salmon
2001: first evidence of transfer of sea
lice from farms to wild salmon in BC
2002: annual BC farmed salmon
production 84,000 tonnes
20022007: sea lice
dominates coverage of
environmental aspects
2002: end of moratorium on new
farm sites
2007 20022007: continued research in BC
on salmonsea lice relations
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
712 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
In the third stage of data collection and analysis, the primary unit of analysis was the individual
text. Each text was carefully examined to identify inductively specific discursive strategies and
language relating to the following aspects: mentions of knowledge, experience and opinions
regarding links or parallels between salmon aquaculture in Europe and in British Columbia; the
assertion or denial of the relevance and/or credibility of these mentions; and the means by which
information was communicated between Europe and Canada (including citation of scientific litera-
ture, direct testimony of individuals, or other means). Identifying these aspects, and thus address-
ing how problems, their causal relations, and their implications are defined, provided a basis for
identifying elements of the frames employed in interpreting this information, and thus for opera-
tionalizing the concept of media framing (Matthes and Kohring, 2008). Data from these analyses
were tabulated to serve as a basis for both qualitative and quantitative conclusions. Finally, these
data were examined in relation to the broader context of the aquaculture issue: the evolution of the
industry, the events and controversies that have constituted its history, and the economic, environ-
mental, social and cultural priorities that have shaped its development.
6. Results and discussion
Patterns in Canadian coverage of European aquaculture
The first research question addressed temporal patterns in Canadian media attention to European
salmon aquaculture, and their relation to the development of aquaculture and related controversies.
This was examined, in part, through quantitative analysis. Figure 1 indicates mentions, by year, of
European aquaculture in the Canadian media, in terms of both numbers of articles and as a percentage
of all articles that mention aquaculture. These data provide a basis for three observations: attention
to European aquaculture has been episodic; over time this attention has increased in terms of abso-
lute number of articles; it has, however, decreased relative to total media attention to aquaculture.
These observations are consistent with patterns of coverage commonly seen in the media, in which
attention to an issue is rarely distributed equally across time, but instead is influenced by a variety
of shifting factors, including external events, the actions of news sources, and media evaluations of
newsworthiness (Nisbet and Lewenstein, 2002).
It can be also hypothesized that these patterns of attention to European salmon aquaculture
reflect local factors, including episodes of heightened interest or concern in Canada regarding
aquaculture, the efforts of actors to place the issue on the public agenda, and the decreased impor-
tance of European information as a result of greater availability of locally generated scientific
results. More generally, these patterns may be the consequence of shifts in how aquaculture has
been defined: as primarily an administrative or managerial issue under the purview of regulatory
agencies; or as a political issue that involves a wider range of actors as occurs when the capacity
or authority of administrative agencies has been placed in doubt (Paehlke and Torgerson, 2005).
Figure 2 provides some insight into these patterns. It indicates the evolving frequency of men-
tions in the Canadian media of economic and environmental dimensions of European aquaculture.
Until the early 1990s the economic dimensions of the European industry generally dominated
coverage; by the late 1990s, the environmental dimensions had begun to receive more attention.
Examining this shift in relation to the history of the industry in British Columbia (see timeline,
Table 1), it can be seen how it corresponds, first, to the growth of the industry during the 1980s, in
part as a result of European investment; and subsequently, to controversies regarding its potential
environmental impacts and conflicts with other coastal resource users that had begun to emerge by
the late 1980s (Keller and Leslie, 1996). These shifts in media attention have also paralleled the
redefinition of aquaculture itself as not merely an administrative, but a political matter, with a
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 713
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
T
o
t
a
l

m
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Articles that mention Europe
Percentage of all aquaculture articles
Linear (Percentage of all aquaculture
articles)
Linear (Articles that mention Europe)
Figure 1. European aquaculture in Canadian news media.
0
5
10
15
20
25
1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
T
o
t
a
l

m
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
Economic mentions
Environmental mentions
Figure 2. Mentions of economic and/or environmental dimensions of European aquaculture in Canadian
news media.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
714 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
wider range of interests seeking to place these environmental impacts and conflicts on the public
agenda (Robson, 2006).
The hypothesis that there are links between the history of aquaculture in Canada and mentions
in the Canadian media of European aquaculture can also be examined in terms of patterns in dis-
cussion of specific environmental aspects of the European industry. Three such aspects have been
most prominent: the occurrence of infectious diseases, such as furunculosis, in farmed salmon; the
potential genetic or ecological impacts of Atlantic salmon in the Pacific coast environment; and the
presence of sea lice on farmed salmon, with the potential for their transfer to wild salmon. As
Figure 3 indicates, mention of disease in the 1980s and 1990s, and of Atlantic salmon (particularly
in the late 1990s), was displaced after 2002 by numerous mentions of sea lice in coverage of
European aquaculture (note that mentions of specific issues in Figure 3 may together exceed total
articles because many articles mention more than one issue). When these patterns are examined in
relation to the timeline (Table 1), three observations can be made. First, coverage of European
aquaculture in the Canadian media can be related to shifts in the prevalence of some concerns in
British Columbia: from disease in the mid-1990s, to a preoccupation in the late 1990s with the
consequences of escaped Atlantic salmon; and then a strong focus on the implications of sea lice
(Gross, 1998; Krkosek et al., 2007). Second, some environmental issues of concern in British
Columbia were not evident in this coverage, particularly local environmental impacts (such as
organic waste near aquaculture facilities, and impacts on marine mammals). Finally, this coverage
has tended to follow, rather than precede, local attention to issues. In other words, European infor-
mation has been considered newsworthy only after analogous concerns had emerged in Canada. As
the media data and the timeline together suggest, this pattern was especially evident with respect
to sea lice from salmon farms parasitizing wild salmon: while European scientists had by the early
1990s identified this as a concern, their conclusions only began to appear in the Canadian media
once it had become a local issue in British Columbia (Table 1). Overall, these observations
0
5
10
15
20
25
1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
T
o
t
a
l

m
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
Atlantic salmon
Lice
Disease
Figure 3. Mentions of specific environmental concerns in references to European aquaculture in Canadian
news media.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 715
corroborate the hypothesis that the newsworthiness of European information, and thus, its movement
through the media, has been influenced by domestic concerns.
How information travels, and the construction of trust and credibility
The second and third research questions consider the means by which the media transport informa-
tion from Europe to Canada, and how this transport can be understood in terms of norms and con-
ventions regarding trust and credibility. As noted above, the existence of a global networked society
does not preclude the continuing importance of the human dimensions of information, including
evaluations of credibility and trust.
Several strategies for moving information are evident. One of these often seen in media cov-
erage of science is the citation of scientific reports. Particularly with respect to prominent inter-
national journals such as Science or Nature, citation of these reports readily accomplishes the
assertion of the global relevance and authority of information. However, this strategy has only
recently become evident in media coverage of aquaculture. For example, documentation in 2005
in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of the transfer of sea lice from farmed to wild salmon
received substantial coverage, as did a study of this topic reported in Science in 2007 (Krkosek
et al., 2005, 2007).
In contrast, various strategies employed by actors involved in aquaculture controversies have
proven to be a more consistent generator of media coverage than have original research reports (on
the importance of sources in generating news coverage see Soloski, 1989; Berkowitz, 1992; Nisbet
et al., 2003). Visits by Canadians to Europe, enabling direct experience with European environ-
mental conditions and contact with European informants, have been especially prominent. This
strategy has been evident in media coverage that assumed a supportive stance towards aquaculture.
Particularly in its early years, discussion of the industrys promising future was often framed in the
context of visits to farms in Norway (see, e.g., Jack Danylchuk, Support in B.C.: Tide turns for
salmon farmers, Financial Post, March 9, 1985). It has also been evident in coverage of environ-
mental problems experienced in Europe, as seen, for example, in coverage of a visit to Norway by
members of the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union a group generally opposed to
salmon aquaculture (Mark Hume, Atlantic salmon escaping pens to imperil wild fish, The
Vancouver Sun, September 2, 1993).
The role of these source-generated strategies, and particularly visits to Europe, in transporting
information between Europe and Canada reflects several aspects relevant to both controversies and
their coverage by the media. First, visits to Europe have been employed as a way of focusing atten-
tion on the issue: in other words, they have been constructed as media events. This exemplifies
a persistent feature of media reporting of science: events being constructed so as to present a body
of knowledge as newsworthy (Molotch and Lester, 1974; Mazur and Lee, 1993; Corbett and
Durfee, 2004). These visits also play a role in asserting the credibility of information from distant
locations. They do so by fulfilling the function of witnessing: conveying knowledge that can
only be obtained through first-hand experience, and through gaining the trust of informants at the
site (on witnessing and scientific authority, see Shapin, 1994). This witnessing and trust building
permits the journalist to speak for local informants, and to link their information with his or her
own knowledge of conditions back in Canada.
Second, this construction of visits to Europe as media events has been tied to efforts to personal-
ize the issue that is, to present information about aquaculture in terms of the thoughts or actions
of individuals. Imparting a human face to information is a common feature of Canadian coverage
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
716 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
of European aquaculture. It is evident, for example, in narratives of visits by journalists to regions
of aquaculture activity within Europe; in discussions with prominent European fisheries experts,
such as Patrick Gargan, a senior scientist with Irelands Central Fisheries Board; and in coverage
of Canadians protesting at the Norwegian headquarters of aquaculture companies active in British
Columbia. Such efforts to personalize information by, for example, interviewing or profiling the
work of individual scientists are a common feature of science journalism generally (Bennett,
2002; Boykoff and Boykoff, 2007). Overall, these constructed events and efforts to personalize the
issue exemplify how the mechanisms of information transfer are shaped by media conventions that
rely on face-to-face information sharing to build trust and credibility.
A third aspect of these source-generated strategies of media coverage is that they exemplify the
significant role of non-official actors in instigating the movement of information. These actors
have included environmentalists, salmon farmers, fishermen and Aboriginal representatives. As
other scholars have noted, coverage of science typically favors official sources, including govern-
ment, industry, and scientists; however, this pattern of sourcing can be expected to shift in times of
political contestation, with an accompanying greater possibility of expanding the public agenda
(Nisbet et al., 2003: 47). This role of other social actors, including environmental interests, in com-
municating information from elsewhere is also a reflection of the more general observation that
when the legitimacy of authoritative sources is undermined, other social actors are better able to
assume the authority of expertise in the media (Jasanoff, 1997). This case study extends this obser-
vation, by identifying the importance of non-official sources in expanding the geographic area
from which information that is considered relevant can be drawn.
The importance of non-official sources also relates to the implications in this context of two
potentially conflicting journalistic norms and practices: the assertion of objectivity, and the selec-
tion of sources that conform to the political stance of the journalist or his/her employer. On the
one hand, the importance placed on objectivity typically encourages journalists to seek balance
by obtaining opposing views (Nisbet and Lewenstein, 2002; Boykoff and Boykoff, 2007). In the
case of information from elsewhere (for example, reports on the consequences of aquaculture in
Norway that are presented in the Canadian media), this norm has expressed itself through presen-
tation of opposing views regarding the relevance and credibility of that information. Those who
contest claims made on the basis of knowledge from elsewhere often do so by casting doubt on
this knowledge, arguing that it has been obtained in conditions unlike (in environmental, regula-
tory, or other terms) those found in British Columbia. However, the movement of information
from Europe to Canada also frequently exhibits the phenomenon of the opportune witness
(Hagen, 1993): that is, a preference for sources that are consistent with the stance either in favor,
or wary of salmon aquaculture of the journalist or newspaper. In media coverage of aquaculture
the use of opportune witnesses has been most evident in efforts to personalize the issue, and also
in efforts to construct stories.
Another strategy for conveying information regarding aquaculture has been the construction of
stories. The most effective such stories both have been compelling and contain a larger message.
One such story, repeated many times, and invoked in the service of opposing arguments, was
derived from efforts in the 1980s to control outbreaks of the Gyrodactylus parasite in Norwegian
rivers by eliminating their salmon hosts (Johnsen and Jensen, 1991). Those opposed to aquacul-
ture in Canada have often asserted that in Norway, by one account, millions of salmon have been
destroyed and entire rivers have been sterilized in an attempt to prevent the spread of [Infectious
Salmon Anemia] and other diseases (Kevin Burke, Escaped Atlantic Salmon are ecology night-
mare, Victoria Times-Colonist, March 29, 1999). In contrast, those seeking to defend aquaculture
have employed this narrative to make a very different point. For example, Marcel Gijssen, writing
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 717
immediately after Burke, condemned what he described as the false claims that salmon farms
have caused rivers to be sterilized because of salmon-farming-related diseases. The fact is that
the only rivers that have been sterilized were those in Norway damaged by horrendous wild-
stock-enhancement practices (Hype on salmon farms, Victoria Times-Colonist, April 10,
1999). For partisans of either view, this narrative provided an effective means of rendering com-
prehensible otherwise complex arguments regarding the ecological implications of aquaculture,
while adhering to media conventions regarding the heuristic value of drama and storytelling. As
studies of risk communication have indicated, such devices, serving as cognitive shortcuts, can
influence how audiences think about the risks and benefits of particular technologies (Allan,
2002; Nisbet et al., 2003).
These communication strategies: visits, personalization, reliance on non-official actors, and
storytelling have sometimes been combined within a single media text to assert the relevance and
credibility of information from elsewhere. A complex and compelling example is provided by
accounts of the work of Alexandra Morton, an independent researcher and the most prominent
opponent of salmon aquaculture in British Columbia. As reported by environmental journalist
Mark Hume, a neighbor and owner of a fishing lodge had in 2001 been the first to alert Morton to
the potential consequences of sea lice for salmon (Mark Hume, Biologists research hooks DFO
but is it too late?, The Globe and Mail, April 4, 2005). Some of the guests at the lodge were from
Scotland, and, by Humes account, were shocked to see salmon farms in British Columbia, asking:
Do you have the sea lice scourge yet? Noting dead salmon fry, these guests also suggested that
British Columbia was experiencing the same impacts of sea lice on salmon as had been seen in
devastated wild trout and salmon stocks in Scotland and Norway. Biologists in Alaska and Norway,
Hume noted, corroborated this conclusion, implicating salmon farms as a cause of the sea lice
Morton was finding on wild salmon. Humes account thus combined aspects of a visit (but, revers-
ing the more common pattern, of Europeans to British Columbia), personalization (including the
use of supportive opportune witnesses), and storytelling, to reinforce the relevance of the European
experience to Canadian concerns, and the credibility of those asserting this relevance.
The roles played by these communication strategies demonstrate that the transfer of knowledge
needs to be understood in terms of the conventions that govern how the media present information.
These conventions address the assertion of relevance, credibility, and trust, resulting in the use of
strategies of visits (and their construction as newsworthy events), personalization, reliance on non-
official actors, and storytelling. In contrast, direct reporting of scientific literature has been a less
significant, and relatively recent, development. These strategies reflect the outcome of negotiations
between sources and journalists during the constructing of news dramas, with these negotiations
shaped by the at times divergent requirements of the professional cultures of scientists and of jour-
nalists (Peters, 1995), and by the specific context of the transfer of information between sites of
knowledge production and consumption.
Agendas and frames in coverage of European aquaculture
As was suggested above, the representation by the media of information from elsewhere is also
shaped by conventions regarding agenda setting and the use of frames as devices to construct
meaning. This has been made amply evident in the course of salmon aquaculture controversies. To
address the fourth research question concerning how the media framed for Canadian audiences
their coverage of the environmental dimensions of European aquaculture the focus of analysis
shifts to the themes and frames deployed in discussions of aquaculture. These assert, first, the rel-
evance of European aquaculture to the Canadian context; and second, supportive or critical
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
718 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
perspectives on the industry, its prospects, and its consequences, thereby serving to either support
or challenge government policies towards the industry.
A careful reading of the 323 articles that included some mention of European aquaculture pro-
vided the basis for deriving inductively four sets of themes employed to assert the relevance of this
information to Canadian readers (see Table 2). Themes relating to the economic and environmental
dimensions of the industry are especially important. Themes relating to material and informational
ties between European and Canadian salmon farming have a lesser but still significant presence. As
the table also indicates (and as will be discussed below), these themes can also serve to organize
diverse frames that have been applied to aquaculture information.
These themes provide the basis for arguments as to why Canadian readers should care about
salmon aquaculture in Europe. This may be, for example, because of the economic ties between
Canadian salmon farms and their Norwegian owners; or because European and Canadian salmon
farms are situated within similar marine environments; or because of the technical advice that
flows back and forth between Canada and Europe. Collectively, these themes, combining finance,
information, and materials, epitomize the hybrid character of environmental flows a phenomenon
of increasing interest to social scientists (Spaargaren et al., 2006). They also demonstrate how the
flow of scientific information cannot be understood in isolation from other flows, such as eco-
nomic investment, or the movement of biological materials.
The international dimension has played a prominent role in the framing of scientific information
regarding the environmental aspects of aquaculture. One such frame has depicted European experi-
ence with aquaculture as a cautionary lesson for British Columbia. For example, an October 1,
1994 article in the Victoria Times-Colonist explained that There have been huge problems with
fish farms in countries such as Norway, Ireland and Chile. In many cases, the same international
companies are now operating in Canada with few controls (Judith Lavoie, Environmentalists
fear more salmon farms after moratorium ends). Presenting a similar perspective, but reinforced
by personal and on-site testimony, a December 20, 2007 article by Stephen Hume, a prominent
journalist for the Vancouver Sun, reported on a recent visit to Ireland by quoting an Irish biologist:
Norway had some of the best rivers in the world for the production of massive salmon they are
just gone Why couldnt we learn from that? Why cant you learn from us? (Stephen Hume,
B.C. wild salmon in danger of extinction). As with economic frames, this environmental frame
could also be employed to urge a policy response. An August 12, 2004 article in the National Post
Table 2. Themes justifying relevance of European aquaculture to Canadian audiences.
Economic themes:
Success of European aquaculture indicating potential of aquaculture in Canada
Competitive position of Canadian farmed salmon in the international marketplace
Flows of international investment in aquaculture between Europe and Canada
Environmental themes:
Environmental problems in European salmon farms as indicators of potential problems in Canadian farms
Ecological similarities between European and Canadian marine environments and aquaculture
Concerns regarding the presence of Atlantic salmon in BC waters
Status of farmed salmon as a global environmental issue
Material themes:
Deliberate transfer of Atlantic salmon eggs from Europe to British Columbia
Inadvertent movement of fish diseases from Europe to British Columbia
Information themes:
Flows of technical innovation and advice between Europe and British Columbia
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 719
exhibited this approach: Governments cant plead ignorance: Years ago, a Canadian delegation
traveled to Norway, Scotland and Ireland and returned with a report on the devastation caused by
the open net fish farms (Bill Cranmer, Fish farms are damaging B.C. waters).
A second environmental frame that has served to reinforce this expression of concern empha-
sizes scientists arguments regarding the status of wild (that is, non-farmed) salmon as an essen-
tial and intrinsic element of coastal economies, cultures, and ecosystems. Using evidence of the
place of salmon in coastal ecosystems (including their role in transporting nutrients from the ocean
to coastal forests) and the historic significance of salmon to coastal indigenous cultures and the
fishing economy, some writers have emphasized the consequences of damaging wild salmon stocks
by citing evidence from Europe that aquaculture may damage these stocks.
Interestingly, the media record presents few instances of drawing on international experience to
contest scientific claims of environmental hazards posed by aquaculture. Instead, those supportive
of the industry have more often framed their presentations in terms of the economic dimensions of
salmon aquaculture, including the opportunities and pressures implied by a global market for fish
and for investment. For example, Norways importance as a model of industry development and a
source of investment is evident in an article from an early phase of rapid growth in the industry. In
a March 9, 1985 article in the Financial Post, it was noted that the most apparent reason for the
change in heart [towards salmon farming] is the overwhelming success of salmon farms in Norway
and Scotland (Jack Danylchuk, Support in B.C.: Tide turns for salmon farmers). Thus, the inter-
national dimension fulfilled an essential role in this positive framing of the industry as an economic
opportunity for British Columbia.
However, the international dimension of aquaculture could also be enlisted to support a more
negative view of the industrys economic prospects. For example, a September 4, 1989 article
noted that Farmed salmon prices have been depressed worldwide this summer [due to] rapid
production increases in farmed salmon, especially in Norway (John Schreiner, Salmon farmers
say federal report is too optimistic, Financial Post). This negative framing was also sometimes
employed in efforts to advocate domestic policy, including more supportive regulatory or subsidy
programs, by presenting these as necessary to maintain a competitive industry.
Overall, it can be argued that the international dimensions of aquaculture have served as a
resource in suggesting and reinforcing specific frames that have been applied to information
regarding aquaculture. Through these frames this information is presented not only efficiently, but
in ways implying particular conclusions, including potential policy agendas. They have also
implied a loosening of the ties between knowledge and local geography that is, a deterritorializing
of proximity.
7. Conclusions
Studies of the news media and science have generally left unexamined the geographical dimensions
of scientific knowledge, and the nature of science as a situated practice. This paper has sought to
redress this neglect. It has done so by demonstrating, first, that the media have played a substan-
tial role in communicating information between the locations in which salmon aquaculture is
practiced. But just as the media do not present a comprehensive and objective portrayal of events
and other phenomena (reflecting the selectivity and shaping of information inherent in framing,
the exercise of journalistic conventions, and other factors), neither do they simply convey infor-
mation from one site to another. Instead, as this paper has argued, the movement of knowledge is
an actively constructed phenomenon, shaped by efforts to assert the relevance of information, by
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
720 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
journalistic conventions that relate to the selection and presentation of information, by the
strategies employed by sources of information, and by aspects of the local context, including
the development of the industry and related controversies. The constructed nature of flows of
information is also evident in how information is transported: predominately through direct
contact (effected by personal visits), and presented in the form of stories or other devices that
respect media conventions. The role of several themes and associated frames in asserting the
local relevance of information from elsewhere provides further demonstration of this con-
structed nature of information flows.
These conclusions provide a corrective to the common assumption in an era of instantaneous
electronic communication that information flows freely and unmediated across oceans and conti-
nents. During the time period examined, the role of the internet in determining what information
would be communicated, and how, has been secondary to that played by social mechanisms of infor-
mation movement. Similarly, the image of a common global pool of scientific knowledge, contrib-
uted to by researchers at a multitude of sites, and drawn upon by an even more diffuse and widely
distributed array of users, obscures the importance of these mechanisms. Instead, the media play a
role in constructing science as a situated practice, by helping to define the character of, and interac-
tions between, local sites of knowledge production and application. Through the media, diverse inter-
ests seek to define the relations between local scientific observations and those made elsewhere in
ways that are consistent with how these interests position themselves within local debates and contro-
versies. This conclusion can provide the basis for a richer understanding of the relations between the
media and the geography of knowledge, that extends beyond the common (but simplistic) assumption
that the importance of information is weighted merely in relation to its proximity to the audience.
The spatial dimensions of aquaculture from local environments to transnational flows of
knowledge and investment make this industry particularly suited to the study of the media and
the situated nature of scientific knowledge. Aquaculture also presents an opportunity to consider
the practical implications of these conclusions for managing the industry and protecting salmon
populations. While decisions should obviously be based on the best scientific knowledge, the
medias role in shaping the movement of information can result in potentially useful knowledge
from elsewhere not always being immediately available. A clear example is the decade-long
delay between European scientists identification, in the early 1990s, of a link between sea lice
and salmon farms, and this information becoming widely known in British Columbia.
These conclusions also imply opportunities for further study. One aspect that would repay atten-
tion is the strategies of information transfer evident in communication and advocacy by partici-
pants in controversies (as seen, for example, on the web sites of industry, environmental
organizations, and other interest groups involved in aquaculture). The construction of geographies
of knowledge by scientists themselves, as evidenced by their citation strategies, also merits further
study. Also promising, particularly in terms of opportunities for interdisciplinary study, are ques-
tions regarding the role of the media and of representations of situated science in the context of the
dynamic and fluid identities of particular places and spaces a matter of increasing interest to criti-
cal geographers (Harvey, 1993). Finally, comparison between the flows of knowledge relating to
aquaculture, and an industry that is less tied to local environmental and social contexts, would
illuminate the importance of these contexts to the movement of knowledge.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
of Canada (410-2007-0520). I thank Will Knight for his research assistance, and the anonymous
reviewers and editor for their thoughtful comments and advice.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 721
References
Allan S (2002) Media, Risk and Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Anderson W and Adams V (2008) Pramoedyas chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience. In: Hackett EJ,
Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, and Wacjman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd
edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 181204.
Antilla L (2005) Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global
Environmental Change 15: 338352.
Appadurai A (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Barnes TJ (2004) Placing ideas: Genius loci, heterotopia and geographys quantitative revolution. Progress in
Human Geography 28: 565595.
Bennett WL (2002) News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman.
Berkowitz D (1992) Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions. In:
Kennamer JD (ed.) Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 81102.
Boykoff MT and Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media
coverage. Geoforum 38: 11901204.
Campbell V (2004) Information Age Journalism: Journalism in an International Context. London: Arnold.
Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on
climate change. Public Understanding of Science 16: 223243.
Corbett JB (2006) Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington,
DC: Island Press.
Corbett JB and Durfee JL (2004) Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global
warming. Science Communication 26(2): 129151.
Eagle J, Naylor R, and Smith W (2004) Why farm salmon outcompete fishery salmon. Marine Policy 28(3):
259270.
Fischer F (2004) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke
University Press.
Flew T (2007) Understanding Global Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gardner J and Peterson DL (2003) Making Sense of the Salmon Aquaculture Debate: Analysis of Issues
Related to Netcage Salmon Farming and Wild Salmon in British Columbia. Vancouver: Pacific Fisheries
Resource Conservation Council.
Grke A and Ruhrmann G (2003) Public communication between facts and fictions: On the construction of
genetic risk. Public Understanding of Science 12: 229241.
Gregory J and Miller S (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum
Trade.
Gross MR (1998) One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 55(Suppl. 1): 131144.
Guha R (1997) The authoritarian biologist and the arrogance of anti-humanism: Wildlife conservation in the
third world. The Ecologist 27(1): 1420.
Hagen LM (1993) Opportune witnesses: An analysis of balance in the selection of sources and arguments in the
leading German newspapers coverage of the census issue. European Journal of Communication 8: 317343.
Harvey D (1993) From space to place and back again: Reflections on the condition of postmodernity. In: Bird J,
Curtis B, Putnam T, and Tickner L (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. New York:
Routledge, 329.
Hites RA, Foran JA, Carpenter DO, Hamilton MC, Knuth BA, and Schwager SJ (2004) Global assessment of
organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 303: 226229.
Hume S, Morton A, Keller BC, Leslie RM, Langer O, and Staniford D (2004) A Stain Upon the Sea: West
Coast Salmon Farming. Madeira Park: Harbour Publishing.
Irwin A and Wynne B (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and
Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jamieson D (2001) Climate change and global environmental justice. In: Miller CA and Edwards PN (eds) Chang-
ing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 287307.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
722 Public Understanding of Science 21(6)
Jasanoff S (1997) Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science
6: 221232.
Jasanoff S and Martello ML (eds) (2004) Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnsen BO and Jensen AJ (1991) The Gyrodactylus story in Norway. Aquaculture 98: 289302.
Keller BC and Leslie RM (1996) Sea-Silver: Inside British Columbias Salmon-Farming Industry. Victoria:
Horsdal & Schubart.
Kirsch S (2000) Peaceful nuclear explosions and the geography of scientific authority. The Professional
Geographer 52(2): 179192.
Kohler RE (2006) All Creatures: Naturalists, Collectors, and Biodiversity, 18501950. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Krkosek M, Lewis MA, and Volpe JP (2005) Transmission dynamics of parasitic sea lice from farm to wild
salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272(1564): 689696.
Krkosek M, Ford JS, Morton A, Lele S, Myers RA, and Lewis MA (2007) Declining wild salmon populations
in relation to parasites from farm salmon. Science 318: 17721775.
Lewis ML (2007) Inventing Global Ecology: Tracking the Biodiversity Ideal in India, 19471997. Athens:
Ohio University Press.
Livingstone D (2003) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
McGarity TO and Wagner WE (2008) Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health
Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Major AM and Atwood LE (2004) Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems, and values.
Public Understanding of Science 13: 295308.
Matthes J and Kohring M (2008) The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and
validity. Journal of Communication 58: 258279.
Mazur A and Lee J (1993) Sounding the global alarm: Environmental issues in the US national news. Social
Studies of Science 23(4): 681720.
Michaels D (2008) Doubt is their Product: How Industrys Assault on Science Threatens your Health.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills DH (ed.) (2003) Salmon at the Edge. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Molotch H and Lester M (1974) News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents,
and scandals. American Sociological Review 39(1): 101112.
Mooney C (2005) The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
Naylor R and Burke M (2005) Aquaculture and ocean resources: Raising tigers of the sea. Annual Review of
Environment and Resources 30: 185218.
Naylor R, Eagle J, and Smith WL (2003) Salmon aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest: A global industry with
local impacts. Environment 45(8): 1839.
Nelkin D (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman
and Company.
Niosi J (2005) Canadas Regional Innovation System: The Science-based Industries. Montreal/Kingston:
McGill-Queens University Press.
Nisbet MC and Lewenstein BV (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the
elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23: 359391.
Nisbet MC, Brossard D, and Kroepsch A (2003) Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of
press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8: 3670.
Paehlke R and Torgerson D (2005) Environmental politics and the administrative state. In: Paehlke R and
Torgerson D (eds) Managing Leviathan: Environmental Politics and the Administrative State. Peterborough:
Broadview Press, 313326.
Peters HP (1995) The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two
professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society 17: 3148.
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Bocking 723
Powell RC (2007) Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geog-
raphy 31(3): 309329.
Priest S (2001) A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public, and Biotechnology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Robson PA (2006) Salmon Farming: The Whole Story. Victoria: Heritage House.
Sachsman DB, Simon J, and Valenti JM (2004) Risk and the environment reporters: A four-region analysis.
Public Understanding of Science 13: 399416.
Sassen S (2000) Spatialities and temporalities of the global: Elements for theorization. Public Culture 12(1):
215232.
Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49(1): 103122.
Scheufele DA (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of
political communication. Mass Communication & Society 3: 297316.
Scheufele DA and Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of
emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 659667.
Scheufele DA and Tewksbury D (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media
effects models. Journal of Communication 57: 920.
Schreiber D (2002) Our wealth sits on the table: Food, resistance, and salmon farming in two First Nations
communities. American Indian Quarterly 26(3): 360377.
Schreiber D (2003) The framing of farmed fish: Product, efficiency, and technology. Canadian Journal of
Sociology 28(2): 153169.
Shapin S (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Shapin S (1998) Placing the view from nowhere: Historical and sociological problems in the location of sci-
ence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23: 512.
Soloski J (1989) Sources and channels of local news. Journalism Quarterly 66: 864870.
Spaargaren G, Mol APJ, and Buttel FH (eds) (2006) Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to
Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weingart P (2007) Communicating science in democratic media societies. In: Tiessen H, Brklacich M,
Breulmann G, and Menezes RSC (eds) Communicating Global Change Science to Society. Washington,
DC: Island Press, 5562.
Weir LK and Grant JWA (2005) Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: A synthesis of data. Environ-
mental Reviews 13: 145168.
Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Under-
standing of Science 9: 85103.
Author Biography
Stephen Bocking is Professor of environmental history and policy, and Chair of the Environmental
and Resource Science/Studies Program, Trent University. His research interests include the inter-
face between science and environmental policy, and the history of environmental science. Current
projects include a study of the transnational science and politics of salmon aquaculture, as well as
studies of the science and politics of biodiversity conservation, and of the history of Arctic envi-
ronmental research. His publications include Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of
Contemporary Ecology (Yale University Press, 1997), and Natures Experts: Science, Politics, and
the Environment (Rutgers University Press, 2004).
at UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES on September 4, 2014 pus.sagepub.com Downloaded from

You might also like