Under the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity, the legal fction that a corporation is an entity with a juridical personality separate and distinct from its members or stockholders may be disregarded. The doctrine will apply when the corporation / s separate juridical personality is used0 (a+ to defeat public convenience1 (b+ to justify wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime1 (c+ as a shield to confuse legitimate issues1 (d+ where the corporation is organi2ed
Under the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity, the legal fction that a corporation is an entity with a juridical personality separate and distinct from its members or stockholders may be disregarded. The doctrine will apply when the corporation / s separate juridical personality is used0 (a+ to defeat public convenience1 (b+ to justify wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime1 (c+ as a shield to confuse legitimate issues1 (d+ where the corporation is organi2ed
Under the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity, the legal fction that a corporation is an entity with a juridical personality separate and distinct from its members or stockholders may be disregarded. The doctrine will apply when the corporation / s separate juridical personality is used0 (a+ to defeat public convenience1 (b+ to justify wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime1 (c+ as a shield to confuse legitimate issues1 (d+ where the corporation is organi2ed
piercing the ei! of corporate entit"# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( Under the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity, the legal fction that a corporation is an entity with a juridical personality separate and distinct from its members or stockholders may be disregarded and the corporation will be considered as a mere association of persons, such that the liability will attach directly to the ofcers and stockholders (Umali v. Court of ppeals, !"# $C% &'#, &'# (!##)*+. ,t is an e-uitable doctrine developed to address situations where the separate corporate personality of a corporation is abused or used for wrongful purposes. 2. To )hat circ*+stances )i!! the doctrine app!"# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .he doctrine will apply when the corporation/s separate juridical personality is used0 (a+ to defeat public convenience1 (b+ to justify wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime1 (c+ as a shield to confuse legitimate issues1 (d+ where a corporation is the mere alter ego or business conduit of a person1 or (e+ where the corporation is organi2ed and controlled and its a3airs are so conducted as to make it merely an instrumentality, agency, conduit or adjunct of another corporation. (Umali v. Court of ppeals, !"# $C% &'#, &'# (!##)*+ ,. What is the +ini+*+ and +a-i+*+ n*+.er of incorporators re/*ired to incorporate stoc0 corporation# Is this a!so the sa+e +ini+*+ and +a-i+*+ n*+.er of directors re/*ired in a stoc0 corporation# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .o incorporate a stock corporation, a minimum of fve (&+ and a ma4imum of ffteen (!&+ incorporators are re-uired ($ec. !), Corp. Code+ 5es, the same minimum and ma4imum number of directors is re-uired in a stock corporation ($ec. !6, Corp. Code+. 1. M*st a!! incorporators and directors .e residents of the 2hi!ippines# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 7o 8nly majority of the incorporators and a majority of the directors must be residents of the 9hilippines ($ecs. !) and ':, Corp. Code+. 3. What is an intra4corporate controers"# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( n intra; corporate controversy is a dispute between a stockholder and the corporation of which he is a stockholder, or between a stockholder and another stockholder of the same corporation, where the subject of the dispute or controversy arose out of such relationship ($unset <iew Condominium Corporation v. Campos, =r., !)6 $C% :): (!#"!*. 78.>?% $U@@?$.?A 7$B?%0 n intra;corporate dispute is a civil case involving the following0 (a+ devices or schemes employed by, or any act of, the board of directors, business associates, ofcers or partners, amounting to fraud or misrepresentation which may be detrimental to the interest of the public andCor of the stockholders, partners, or members of any corporation, partnership, or association1 (b+ controversies arising out of intra;corporate, partnership, or association relations, between and among stockholders, members, or associates1 and between, any or all of them and the corporation, partnership, or association of which they are stockholders, members, or associates, respectively1 (c+ controversies in the election or appointment of directors, trustees, ofcers, or managers of corporations, partnerships or associations1 (d+ derivative suits1 and (e+ inspection of corporate books ($C dm. Demo. 7o. )!;';)6 ('))!*+. 6. Is the $ec*rities and E-change 5o++ission the en*e for actions ino!ing intra4corporate controersies# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 7o. ctions involving intra;corporate controversies are cogni2able by the %egional .rial Court, designated by the $upreme Court under $C dm. Demo 7o. ));!!;):, which has jurisdiction over the principal ofce of the corporation, partnership or association concerned ($ec. &, %ule !, $C dm. Demo. 7o. )';';)6+. 2003 BAR EXAMINATION 1. %nder )hat conditions +a" a stoc0 corporation ac/*ire its o)n shares# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .he conditions under which a stock corporation can ac-uire its own share are0 (a+ that it be for a legitimate and proper corporate purpose1 and (b+ that there shall be unrestricted retained earnings to purchase the same and its capital is not thereby impaired. ($ec. 6!, Corp. Code+ 2. 6anice rendered so+e cons*!tanc" )or0 for X78 5orporation. 9er co+pensation inc!*ded shares of stoc0 therein. 5an X78 5orporation iss*e shares of stoc0 to pa" for the serices of 6anice as its cons*!tant# 'isc*ss "o*r ans)er. $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .he corporation can issue shares of stock to pay for actually performed services to the corporation, but not for future services or services yet to be performed. ($ec. E'(:+, Corp. Code+ ,. 'iine 5orporation is engaged in the +an*fact*re of gar+ents for e-port. In the co*rse of its .*siness: it )as a.!e to o.tain !oans fro+ indiid*a!s and ;nancing instit*tions. 9o)eer: d*e to the drop in the de+and of gar+ents in the internationa! +ar0et: 'iine 5orporation co*!d not +eet its o.!igations. It decided to se!! a!! its e/*ip+ent s*ch as se)ing +achines: per+a4press +achines: high speed se)ers: c*tting ta.!es: ironing ta.!es: etc. as )e!! as its s*pp!ies and +ateria! to Top &rade <ashion 5orporation: its co+petitor. =a> 9o) )o*!d "o* c!assif" the transaction# =.> 5an 'iine 5orporation se!! the aforesaid ite+s to its co+petitor: Top &rade <ashion 5orporation# What are the re/*ire+ents to a!id!" se!! the ite+s. E-p!ain. =c> 9o) )o*!d "o* protect the interests of the creditors of 'iine 5orporation# =d> In case 'iine 5orporation io!ated the !a): )hat re+edies are aai!a.!e to Top &rade <ashion 5orporation against 'iine 5orporation# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( (a+ .he sale is a sale in bulk, because it is a sale of all or substantially all of the f4tures used in and about the business of the vendor, a garments manufacturer. ($ection ', ct 7o. :#&'+ (b+ Aivine Corporation can sell the aforesaid items to .op @rade Fashion Corporation. Gut it must secure the approval of at least two;thirds of its stockholders and a majority vote of the members of its board of directors as this is a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. ($ection 6), Corporation Code+ (c+ .o protect the interest of the creditors, , will re-uire the seller to prepare an afdavit stating the names of all its creditors, their addresses, the amount of their credits and their respective maturities, and to submit the afdavit to the buyer who, in turn, should notify the creditors about the transaction he is about to conclude with the seller. ($ecs. :, 6, &, H, #, Gulk $ales Iaw+ ,f the transaction was made to defraud creditors, the latter may have the contract rescinded. .he creditors may also fle a petition for involuntary insolvency and have the sale voided if it was made in fraud of creditors. (d+ .op @rade Fashion may recover the amount paid if the sale was made in fraud of creditors and sue for damages. 1. %nder )hat circ*+stances +a" a corporation dec!are diidends# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( corporation may declare dividends if it has unrestricted retained earnings. ($ec. 6:, Corp. Code+ 3. 'isting*ish diidend fro+ pro;t? cash diidend fro+ stoc0 diidend. $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 9rofts belong to the corporation, while dividends belong to the stockholder when dividend is declared. cash dividend involves disbursement of earnings to stockholders, while stock dividend does not involve any disbursement. cash dividend a3ects the fractional interest in the property which each share represents, while a stock dividend decreases the fractional interest in corporate property which each share represents. cash dividend does not increase the legal capital, while a stock dividend does, as there is no cash outlay involves. Cash dividends are subject to income ta4, while stock dividends are not. Aeclaration of stock dividend re-uires the approval of both the majority of the members of the board of directors and at least two thirds of the stockholders. ,n the declaration of cash dividend, the approval by majority of the members of the board of directors will sufce. 6. <ro+ )hat f*nds are cash and stoc0 diidends so*rced# E-p!ain )h". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( Goth case dividend and stock dividend may be declared out of the unrestricted retained earnings. 9aid;in surplus can be declared stock dividend but not cash dividend, because a stock dividend merely transfers the paid; in surplus to capital. @. A Aorean nationa! Boined a corporation )hich is engaged in the f*rnit*re +an*fact*ring .*siness. 9e )as e!ected to the Board of 'irectors. To co+p!e+ent its f*rnit*re +an*fact*ring .*siness: the corporation a!so engaged in the !ogging .*siness. With the additiona! !ogging actiit": can the Aorean nationa! sti!! .e a +e+.er of the Board of 'irectors# E-p!ain. $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 5es. .he Jorean can still be a member of the board of directors, if he has sufcient e-uity to entitle him to a seat. $ince the corporation is only re-uired to be at least E)K owned by Filipino citi2ens, foreigners can be members of the board of directors in proportion to their e-uity which cannot e4ceed 6)K. ($ec.!, 9.A. 7o. H!&, amending C.. 7o. $ec. '; of C.. 7o. !)", .he nti;Aummy Iaw+ C. BrieD" disc*ss the doctrine of corporate opport*nit". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .he doctrine of corporate opportunity means that if the director ac-uired for himself a business opportunity that should belong to the corporation, he must account to the corporation for all the profts obtained, unless his acts was ratifed by at least two;thirds of the stockholders. ($ection :6, Corp. Code+ E. Ma!"n: $chiera and 6aF are the directors of 2atio Inest+ents: a c!ose corporation for+ed to r*n the 2atio 5afe: an a! fresco coGee shop in Ma0ati 5it". In 2000: 2atio 5afe .egan e-periencing ;nancia! reerses: conse/*ent!": so+e of the chec0s it iss*es to its .eerage distri.*tors and e+p!o"ees .o*nced. In Octo.er 200,: $chiera infor+ed Ma!"n that she fo*nd a !ocation for a second cafe in Tag*ig 5it". Ma!"n o.Bected .eca*se of a dire ;nancia! condition of the corporation. $o+eti+e in Apri! 2001: Ma!"n !earned a.o*t <ort 2atio 5afe !ocated in Tag*ig 5it" and that its dee!op+ent )as *nderta0en ." a ne) corporation 0no)n as <ort 2atio: Inc. )here .oth $chiera and 6aF are directors. Ma!"n a!so fo*nd that $chiera and 6aF: on .eha!f of 2atio Inest+ents: had o.tained a !oan of 2300:000 fro+ 2B5o+ Ban0: for the p*rpose of opening <ort 2atio 5afe. This !oan )as sec*red ." the assets of 2atio Inest+ents and persona!!" g*aranteed ." $chiera and 6aF. Ma!"n then ;!ed a corporate deriatie action .efore the Regiona! Tria! 5o*rt of Ma0ati 5it" against $chiera and 6aF: a!!eging that the t)o directors had .reach their ;d*ciar" d*ties ." +isappropriating +one" and assets of 2atio Inest+ents in the operation of <ort 2atio 5afe. =a> 'id $chiera and 6aF io!ate the princip!e of corporate opport*nit". E-p!ain. =.> Was it proper for Ma!"n to ;!e a deriatie s*it )ith pra"er for inB*nctie re!ief# E-p!ain. =c> Ass*+ing that a deriatie s*it is proper: +a" the action contin*e if the corporation is disso!ed d*ring the pendenc" of the s*it# E-p!ain. $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( (a+ $chiera and =a2 violated the principle of corporate opportunity, because they used 9atio ,nvestments to obtain a loan, mortgaged its assets and used the proceeds of the loan to ac-uire a co3ee shop through a corporation they formed. ($ection :6, Corporation Code+ (b+ ,t was proper for Dalyn to fle a derivative suit with a prayer for injunction, because $chiera and =a2 diverted the assets of the corporation for their own personal beneft. (Gallentine on Corporations %ev, ?d., p.::6+ (c+ .he case should be allowed to continue so that the assets and claims should be administered for the beneft of all concerned, as they should have been administered before dissolution of the corporation. (Gallentine on Corporations %ev, ?d., p.::"+ 2001 BAR EXAMINATION 1. Ms. OB )as e+p!o"ed in MA$ Inest+ent Ban0. WI5: a +edica! dr*g co+pan": retained the Ban0 to assess )hether it is desira.!e to +a0e a tender oGer for 'O2 co+pan": a dr*g +an*fact*rer. OB oerheard in the co*rse of her )or0 the p!ans of WI5. B" herse!f and thr* associates: she p*rchased 'O2 stoc0s aai!a.!e at the stoc0 e-change priced at 220 per share. When WI5Hs tender oGer )as anno*nced: 'O2 stoc0s B*+ped to 2,0 per share. Th*s OB earned a siFa.!e pro;t. Is OB !ia.!e for .reach and +is*se of con;dentia! or insider infor+ation gained fro+ her e+p!o"+ent# Is she a!so !ia.!e for da+ages to se!!ers or .*"ers )ith )ho+ she traded# If so: )hat is the +eas*re of s*ch da+ages. E-p!ain .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 8G is an insider (as defned in $ubsection :." (:+ of the $%C since she is an employee of the Gank, the fnancial adviser of A89, and this relationship gives her access to material information about the issuer (A89+ and the latter/s securities (shares+, which information is not generally available to the public. ccordingly, 8G is guilty of insider trading under $ection 'H of the $ecurities %egulation Code which re-uires disclosure when trading in securities. 8G is also liable for damages to sellers or buyers with whom she traded. Under $ubsection E:.! of the $ecurities %egulation Code, the damages awarded could be an amount not e4ceeding triple the amount of the transaction plus actual damages. ?4emplary damages may also be awarded in case of bad faith, fraud, malevolence, or wantonness in the violation of the $ecurities %egulation Code or its implementing rules. .he court is also authori2ed to award attorney/s fees not e4ceeding :)K of the award. 2. What is a corporation so!e# 9o) does one pierce the ei! of corporate ;ction# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( $ection !!) of the Corporation Code defnes a corporation sole as one formed for the purpose of administering and managing, as trustee, the a3airs, property and temporalities of any religious denomination, sect or church. ,t is formed by the chief archbishop, bishop, priest, minister rabbi or other presiding elder of such religious denomination, sect or church. .he veil of corporate fction may be pierced by proving in court that the notion of legal entity is being used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime or the entity is just an instrument or alter ego or adjunct of another entity or person. ,. 'isting*ish c!ear!" =1> a priate corporation fro+ a p*.!ic corporation? and =2> a stoc0 corporation fro+ a non4 stoc0 corporation. $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( private corporation is one formed for some private purpose beneft or end, while a public corporation is formed for the government of a portion of the $tate for the general good or welfare. .he true test is the purpose of the corporation. ,f the Corporation is created for political or public purpose connected with the administration of the government, then it is a public corporation. ,f not, it is a private corporation although thw hole or substantially the whole interest in the corporation belongs to the $tate. public corporation is created by special legislation or act of Congress. private corporation must be organi2ed under the Corporation Code. stock corporation is one with that has capital stock divided into shares and is authori2ed to distribute to the holders of such share dividends or allotments of the surplus proft on the basis of the shares held. ll other corporations are non;stock corporations. 1. Is there a diGerence .et)een de facto corporation and a corporation ." estoppe!# E-p!ain .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( de facto corporation is one which actually e4ists for all practical purposes as a corporation but which has no legal right to corporate e4istence as against the $tate. ,t is essential to the e4istence of a de facto corporation that there be (!+ a valid law under which a corporation might be incorporated, ('+ a bona fde attempt to organi2e as a corporation under such law, and (:+ actual use or e4ercise in good faith of corporate powers conferred upon it by law. corporation by estoppel e4ists when persons assume to act as a corporation knowing it to be without authority to do so. ,n this case, those persons will be liable as general partners for all debts, liabilities and damages incurred or arising as a result of their actions. 3. <o*r +onths .efore his death: 2X assigned 100 shares of stoc0 registered in his na+e in faor of his )ife and his chi!dren. The" then .ro*ght the deed of assign+ent to the proper corporate oIcers for registration )ith the re/*est for the transfer in the corporationHs stoc0 and transfer .oo0s of the assigned shares: the cance!!ation of the stoc0 certi;cates in 2XHs na+e: and the iss*ance of ne) stoc0 certi;cates in the na+es of his )ife and his chi!dren as the ne) o)ners. The oIcers of the 5orporation denied the re/*est on the fo*nd that another heir is contesting the a!idit" of the deed of assign+ent. Ma" the corporation .e co+pe!!ed ." +anda+*s to register the shares of stoc0 in the na+es of the assignees# E-p!ain .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 5es. .he Corporation may be compelled by mandamus to register the shares of stock in the name of the assignee. .he only legal limitation imposed by $ection E: of the Corporation Code is when the Corporation holds any unpaid claim against the shares intended to be transferred. .he alleged claim of another heir of 9L is not sufcient to deny the issuance of new certifcates of stock to his wife and children. ,t would be otherwise if the transferee/s title to the shares has no prima facie validity or is uncertain. 6. The Board of 'irectors of AB5: Inc.: a do+estic corporation passed a reso!*tion a*thoriFing additiona! iss*ance of shares of stoc0s )itho*t notice nor approa! of the stoc0ho!ders. 'X: a stoc0ho!der: o.Bected to the iss*ance: contending that it io!ated the right of pre4e+ption to the *niss*ed shares. Is his contention tena.!e# E-p!ain .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 5es. AL/s contention is tenable. Under $ection :# of the Corporation Code, all stockholders of GC, ,nc. enjoy pre;emptive right to subscribe to all issues of shares of any class, including the reissuance of treasury shares in proportion to their respective shareholdings. @. AA: a +inorit" stoc0ho!der: ;!ed a s*it against BB: 55: '' and EE: the ho!ders of the +aBorit" shares of MO2 5orporation: for a!!eged +isappropriation of corporate f*nds. The co+p!aint aerred: inter a!ia: that MO2 5orporation is the corporation in )hose .eha!f and for )hose .ene;t the deriatie s*it is .ro*ght. In their capacit" as +e+.ers of the Board of 'irectors: the +aBorit" stoc0ho!ders adopted a reso!*tion a*thoriFing MO2 5orporation to )ithdra) the s*it. 2*rs*ant to said reso!*tion: the corporate co*nse! ;!ed a Motion to 'is+iss in the na+e of MO2 5orporation. $ho*!d the +otion .e granted or denied# Reason .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 7o. ll the re-uisites for a valid derivative suit e4ist in this case. First, was e4empt from e4hausting his remedies within the corporation, and did not have to make a demand on the G8A for the latter to sue. >ere, such a demand would be futile, since the directors who comprise the majority are the ones guilty of the wrong complained of. $econd, appears to be a stockholder at the time of the alleged misappropriation of corporate funds. .hird, the suit is brought on behalf and for the beneft of D89 Corporation. ,n this connection, it was held in Conmart (9hils.+ ,nc. v. $?C, !#" $C% H: (!##!+ that to grant to the corporation concerned the right of withdrawing or dismissing the suit, at the instance of the majority stockholders and directors who themselves are the persons alleged to have committed the breach of trust against the interests of the corporation would be to emasculate the right of minority stockholders to seek redress for the corporation. Filing such action as a derivative suit even by a one stockholder is one of the protections e4tended by law to minority stockholders against abuses of the majority. ". X78 5orporation entered into a contract of !ease )ith AB5: Inc.: oer a piece of rea! estate for a ter+ of 20 "ears: rene)a.!e for another 20 "ears: proided that X78Hs corporate ter+ is e-tended in accordance )ith !a). <o*r "ears after the ter+ of X78 5orporation e-pires: .*t sti!! )ithin the period a!!o)ed ." the !ease contract for the e-tension of the ease period: X78 5orp. noti;ed AB5: Inc.: that it is e-ercising the option to e-tend the !ease. AB5: Inc. o.Bected to the proposes e-tension: arg*ing that since the corporate !ife of X78 5orp. had e-pired: it co*!d no !onger opt to rene) the !ease. X78 5orp. co*ntered that )ithstanding the !apse of its corporate ter+ it sti!! has the right to rene) the !ease .eca*se no /*o )arranto proceedings for ino!*ntar" disso!*tion of X78 5orp. has .een instit*ted ." the OIce of the $o!icitor &enera!. Is the contention of X78 5orp. +eritorio*s# E-p!ain .rieD". $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( .he contention is not meritorious. Gased on the ruling of the $upreme Court in 9hilippine 7ational Gank v. CF, of %i2al, ')# $C% (!##'+. L5M Corp. was dissolved ipso facto upon the e4piration of its original terms. ,t ceased to be a body corporate for the purpose of continuing the business for which it was organi2ed, e4cept only for purposes connected with its winding up or li-uidation. ?4tending the lease is not an act to wind up or li-uidate L5M Corp./s a3airs. ,t is contrary to the idea of winding up the a3airs of the corporation. #. 5J$ .rading fled a complaint for specifc performance with damages against 9BC Corporation for failure to deliver cement ordered by plainti3. ,n its answer, 9BC denied liability on the ground, inter alia, that E. 7A$ Trading ;!ed a co+p!aint for speci;c perfor+ance )ith da+ages against 2W5 5orporation for fai!*re to de!ier ce+ent ordered ." p!aintiG. In its ans)er: 2W5 denied !ia.i!it" on the gro*nd: inter a!ia: that 7A$ has no persona!it" to s*e: not .eing incorporated: and that the 2resident of 2W5 )as not a*thoriFed to enter into a contract )ith p!aintiG ." the 2W5 Board of 'irectors: hence the contract is *!tra ires. 7A$ Trading rep!ied that it is a so!e proprietorship o)ned ." 7A$: and that the 2resident of 2W5 had +ade it appear in seera! !etters presented in eidence that he had the a*thorit" to sign the contracts on .eha!f of the BO' of 2W5. Wi!! the s*it prosper or not# $%&&E$TE' AN$WER( 5es the suit will prosper. s a sole proprietorship, the proprietor of 5J$ .rading has the capacity to act and the personality to sue 9BC. ,t is not necessary for 5J$ .rading to be incorporated before it can sue. 8n the other hand, 9BC is estopped from asserting that its 9resident has no authority to enter into the contract, considering that in several of 9BC/s letters, it had clothed its 9resident with apparent authority to deal with 5J$ .rading.