Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 2
(Lecture 7)
NATURAL SOIL DEPOSITS AND SUBSOIL EXPLORATION
Topics
1.17 CONE PENETRATION TEST
1.18 PRESSUREMETER TEST (PMT)
1.19 DILATOMETER TEST
1.20 CORING OF ROCKS
1.21 PREPARATION OF BORIN LOGS
1.22 DETERMINATION OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN
THE FIELD
1.22.1Open End Test
NPTEL - ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-1
CONE PENETRATION TEST
The cone penetration test (CPT), originally known as the Dutch cone penetration test, is a
versatile sounding method that can be used to determine the materials in a soil profile and
estimate their engineering properties. This test is also called the static penetration test, and no
boreholes are necessary to perform it. In the original version, a 60
) to penetration
developed by the cone, which is equal to the vertical force applied to the cone divided by its
horizontally projected area, and (b) the frictional resistance (
and
:
a. Mechanical friction-cone penetrometer (figure 2.25). In this case the penetrometer tip is
connected to an inner set of rods. The tip is first advanced about 40 mm giving the cone
resistance. With further thrusting, the top engages the friction sleeve. As the inner rod
advances, the rod force is equal to the sum of the vertical force on the cone and sleeve.
Subtracting the force on the cone gives the side resistance.
NPTEL - ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-1
Figure 2.25 Mechanical friction-cone penetrometer (after ASTM 1992)
b. Electric friction-cone penetrometer (figure 2.26). In this case the tip is attached to a
string of steel rods. The tip is pushed into the ground at the rate of 20 mm/sec. wires from
the transducers are threaded through the center of the rods and continuously give the cone
and side resistance.
NPTEL - ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-1
Figure 2.26 Electric friction-cone penetrometer (after ASTM 1992)
Figure 2.27 shows the results of penetrometer tests in a soil profile with friction measurement by
a mechanical friction-cone penetrometer and an electric friction cone penetrometer.
Figure 2.27 Penetrometer tests with riction measurement (after Ruiter, 1971)
Several correlations that are useful in estimating the properties of soils encountered during an
exploration program have been developed for the point resistance (
)
obtained from the cone penetration tests. The friction ratio,
, is defined as
=
friction resistance
cone resistance
=
[2.24]
Lancellotta (1983) and Jamiolkowski et al. (1985) showed that the relative density of normally
consolidated sand,
, and
can be correlated as
(%) = + log
10
[2.25]
Where
, = constants
and
-98 66 metric ton/m
2
Figure 2.28 shows the correlations obtained for several sands. Baldi et al. (1982), and Robertson
and Campanella (1983) also recommended an empirical relationship between vertical effective
stress (
), relative density (
) and
and
and
[2.26]
Robertson and Campanella (1983) also provided a general correlation between
, friction and
, and the type of sol encountered in the field (figure 2.31). Figure 2.32 shows the general
range of
as proposed in figures 2.30, 2.31, and 2.32, equations 25 and 26 are for
normally consolidated sands. In fact, for a general condition,
is a function of
, relative
density, and vertical and lateral initial effective stress. A more rational theory for that correlation
has been provided by Salgado, Mitchell, and Jamiolkowski (1997), and readers may refer to that
paper for further information.
According to Mayne and Kemper, (1988), in clayey soil the undrained cohesion
,
preconsolidation pressure
[2.27]
Or
[2.27a]
Where
= vertical stress
, and
= 0.243(
)
0.96
MN/m
2
MN/m
2
[2.28]
And
= 0.37
1.01
[2.29]
Where
and
) of 535 cm
3
.
Following are the dimensions for the probe diameter and the diameter of the borehole as
recommended by ASTM:
Figure 2.33 (a) Pressuremeter; (b) plot of pressure versus total cavity volume
Probe diameter (mm)
Borehole diameter
Nominal (mm) Maximum (mm)
44 45 53
58 60 70
74 76 89
In order to conduct a test, the measuring cell volume,
, represents the creep, or yield, pressure. The zone marked III is the plastic zone. The
pressure,
= 2(1 +)(
[2.30]
Where
2
=
= Poisson
= 0.45
[2.31]
Where
= preconsolidation pressure
Based on the cavity expansion theory, Baguelin et al. (1978) proposed that
=
(
[2.32]
Where
= 1 +in
NPTEL - ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-1
Typical values of
vary between 5 to 12, with an average of about 8.5. Ohya et al. (1982) (see
also Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990) correlated
) for
sand and clay as follows:
Clay:
(kN/m
2
) = 1930
F
0.63
[2.33]
Sand:
(kN/m
2
) = 908
F
0.66
[2.34]
DILATOMETER TEST
The use of the flat-plate dilatometer test (DMT) is relatively recent (Marchetti, 1980;
Schmertmann, 1986). The equipment essentially consists of a flat plate
measuring220 mm (length) 95mm (width) 14mm (thickness)(8.66 in. 3.74in.
0.55 in. ). a thin flat circular expandable steel membrade having a diameter of 60 mm (2.36 in.)
is located flush at the center on one side of the plate (figure 2.34a). The dilatometer probe is
inserted into the ground using a cone penetrometer testing rig (figure 2.34b). Gas and electric
lines extend from the surface control box through the penetrometer rod into the blade. At the
required depth, high-pressure nitrogen gas is used to inflate the membrane. Two pressure
readings are taken. They are
Figure 2.34 (a) Schematic diagram of a flat-plate dilatometer; (b) dilatometer probe inserted into
ground
NPTEL - ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-1
1. The pressure A to lift off the membrane, and
2. The pressure B at which the membrane expands 1.1 mm (0.4 in.) into the surrounding soil
The A and B readings are corrected as follows (Schmertmann, 1986)
Contact stress,
= 1.05( +
) 0.05(
) [2.35]
Expansion stress,
1
=
[2.36]
Where
= vacuum pressure required to keep the membrane in contact with its seating
=
air pressure required inside the membrane to deflect in outward to a center expansion of 1.1mm
=
1
2. Horizontal stress index,
3. Dilatometer modulus,
(kN/m
2
) = 34.7(
1
kN/m
2
kN/m
2
)
Where
1.5
0.47
0.6 [2.37]
b. = (0.5
)
1.6
[2.38]
c.
(0.5
)
1.25
[2.40]
e. = (1
2
)
[2.41]
Where
) andthe
dilatometer modulus (
2
(for 10 > ) [2.47]
Where
= hydraulic conductivity
= constant rate of flow into the hole
= length of portion of the hole under test
= radius of the hole
= diferential pressure head
Note that the differential pressure head is the sum of the gravity head [
(gravity )
] and the
pressure head [
(pressure )
]. The packer test is used primarily to determine the hydraulic
conductivity of rock. However, as mentioned previously, it and also be used for soils.