Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+ < )1+
$igure %& Tapered cantilever beam
)Corre*$on(in% a!thor+ ,ac!lty of Mechanical an( Civil 'n%ineerin%
-niver*ity of .ra%!/evac, 01000 .ral/evo, 2o*ite/eva 13 4#erbia5, ni6olic7a89f6v76%7ac7r*
VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart $a%e&-"'n( $a%e&
A riid 1ulti*ody 1odel of the ta3ered cantilever
*ea1 5ill *e created in t5o ste3s, -n the first ste3, the
e2act sha3e of the cantilever *ea1 is a33ro2i1ated 5ith n
fle2i*le se1ents of constant 5idth, -n the second ste3,
each n fle2i*le se1ent is divided into ! e4ual fle2i*le
se1ents, -n further te2t, the division in the first ste3 5ill
*e called 3ri1ary division, and the division in the second
ste3 5ill *e called secondary division, Ari1ary division
should a33ro2i1ate the e2act sha3e of the cantilever *ea1
in the *est 5ay, and secondary division should additionally
increase accuracy,
.he 3ara1eters 5hich define each of the o*tained
se1ents areC
Dthe 1odulus of elasticity of the 1aterial E,
Dthe shear 1odulus of the 1aterialC
( )
,
: 1
E
'
+
):+
Dthe Aoisson coefficient
,
Dthe density of the 1aterial ,
Dthe lenth of the se1ent after 3ri1ary divisionC
, 1,,,,, ,
i
#
# i n
n
)$+
Dthe 5idth of the se1ent after 3ri1ary divisionC
1
1
1
) +, 1,
:
) +, 1 ,
:
b
i i
i
b !
!
#
f i
b
#
f # i n
'
+ <
);+
Dthe area of the cross section of the se1ent after 3ri1ary
division
i
A
,
Dthe a2ial 1o1ent of inertia for the 3rinci3al a2is 6 of the
cross section of the *ea1 after 3ri1ary division
(i
I
,
.he a33ro2i1ative sha3e of the ta3ered *ea1 after
3ri1ary and secondary divisions is sho5n in Fi, : *y
dashed lines,
:,1, 0ur a33roach
Each of n)! fle2i*le se1ents is divided into three
riid se1ents, 5here the first and second riid se1ents
are interconnected throuh a 3ris1atic #oint, and the
second and third se1ents throuh a revolute #oint )see
Fi, $a+,
.he s3rins of corres3ondin stiffness are 3laced in
the #oints, .he a33ro2i1ative 1odel of the fle2i*le
ta3ered cantilever *ea1 is thus o*tained in the for1 of an
o3ened kine1atic chain 5ithout *ranchin 1ade of :n)!
riid se1ents connected throuh the corres3ondin #oints
and s3rins in the1 )see Fi, ;+, >et us deter1ine the
3ara1eters of the o*served 1echanical syste1 5hich are
necessary for further considerations,
.he stiffness of s3rins in the #oints of the iDth
se1ent *ased on 798, for the case of *endin of the *ea1
in one 3lane, areC
$
$
1:
, ,
(i (i
r s
i i
E I EI
c ! c !
# #
)<+
5here the indices r and s areC
( )
( )
: 1 : 1 ,
: : 1 , 1, , 1, ,
r " ! i
s " ! i i n " !
+
+
)%+
.he lenth of the riid se1ents isC
,
:
i
r
l
l
)9+
$
, ,
:
, ,
, ,
i
s i i
i
l " !
l l l " ! i n
l " ! i n
<
+ <
'
)E+
5here
1
, ,
: ;
i i
i i
# #
l l
! !
+
)(+
.he 1ass of the riid se1ents isC
( ) 1
,
, ,
,
r i r
i i i i
s
i s
m Al
Al A l " ! i n
m
Al
+ <
'
)1&+
.he 3osition of the centre of 1ass of each riid
se1ent is defined *y the local 3osition vector of the
centre of 1ass in relation to the *einnin of the se1entC
,
u u u u
T
c c c c
1
]
# )11+
$igure *& An approimation of the cantilever tapered beam by stepped beams
:7;i6oli<, #7=alini<
>rocee(in%* of VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart >a%e&-"'n( >a%e&
a+ b+
c+
$igure ,& The rigid multibody model of the i-th fleible beam segment& a+ -resented approach, b+ .ef. /%0, c+ .ef. /*0, /,0
$igure 1& The rigid multibody model of the fleible beam
5here
&,< ,
r
c r
l
( )
:
1
1
&,< &,<
, ,
&,< ,
s
i i i i i i
c
i i i i
s
Al A l l l
" ! i n
A l A l
l
+
+
+ +
<
'
+
&, &, 1, : ,
u u
c c
u !n
)1:+
.he local vectors of the riid se1ents areC
[ ] & & , 1, : ,
T
u u
l u !n # )1$+
.he 1o1ent of inertia of the riid se1ent in relation to
the a2is 3er3endicular to the 3lane of rotation isC
( )
( )
( )
( )
: :
:
: :
:
: :
1 1
: :
,
1:
1
1: :
1
,
1: :
,
,
1:
r
s
s s
r
c r r
i
i i i i c
i
c i i i i i c
s
i r
m
2 a l
l
Al a l
l
2 A l a l l
" ! i n
m
a l
+ +
+
_
_
+ +
,
,
_
_
+ + + +
'
,
,
<
)1;+
;at!ral fre?!encie* of a ta$ere( cantilever bea9 of con*tant thic6ne** an( linearly ta$ere( @i(th
VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart $a%e&-"'n( $a%e&
5hereC
, if the cross section is rectanular ,
$
, if the cross section is circular ,
:
i
i
h
d
'
a
)1<+
.he unit vectors of the a2is of the uDth #oint areC
[ ]
[ ]
& 1 & , if the Dth #oint is 3ri61atic,
& & 1 , if the Dth #oint is revolute,
T
u
T
u
u
'
e
)1%+
5here 1, : , u !n
.he coefficients
u
and
u
re3resent identifiers of
the #oint ty3e, 5here it holds thatC
1, if the Dth #oint is 3ris1atic,
&, if the Dth #oint is revolute,
u
u
u
'
)19+
as 5ell as that
1
u u
:,:, A33roach fro1 718
Each of n)! fle2i*le se1ents is divided into three
riid se1ents, 5here the first and second riid se1ents,
as 5ell as the third and fourth ones, are interconnected
5ith a revolute #oint )see Fi, $*+, .he s3rins of the
corres3ondin riidity are 3laced in those #oints, Si1ilarly
to our a33roach, the a33ro2i1ative 1odel of the fle2i*le
ta3ered cantilever *ea1 in the for1 of an o3en kine1atic
chain 5ithout *ranchin 1ade of :n)! riid se1ents
connected 5ith the corres3ondin #oints and s3rins in
the1 is o*tained, >et us deter1ine the 3ara1eters of the
o*served 1echanical syste1 5hich are necessary for
further considerations,
.he stiffnesses of s3rins in the #oints of the iDth
se1ent *ased on 718 areC
: , 1, ,
(i
r s
i
EI
c c ! i n
#
)1E+
5here the indices r and s are defined in the e23ression )%+,
.he lenth of the riid se1ents isC
1 :
,
r i
p
l l
p
)1(+
: , ,
, ,
, ,
i
s i i
i
l " !
l l l " ! i n
l " ! i n
<
+ <
'
):&+
5here
1
, ,
i i
i i
# #
l p l p
! !
+
):1+
and 5here
1 1
1
: $
p
_
,
is the coefficient of division of
the *ea1, /eference 718 sho5s that, es3ecially for this
value of the coefficient, the assu1ed 1odel of the *ea1 is
reduced to a si13ler sha3e 5hich contains s3rins only in
the #oints )see Fi, $*+, -n an o33osite case, the 1odel of
the *ea1 also contains a s3rin 5hich connects the first
and third riid *odies, and then the 3rocess of 1odellin
the fle2i*le *ea1 *y this 1ethod *eco1es considera*ly
co13licated,
.he local 3osition vector of the centre of 1ass of
riid se1ents
u
c
#
, the 1ass of the riid se1ents
u
m
and
the 1o1ent of inertia of the riid se1ent in relation to
the a2is
u
c
2
) 1, : u ! n + 1ay *e defined fro1 the
e23ressions )1&+D)1;+, 5here i
i i
l l
are iven in the
e23ression ):1+,
.he unit vectors of the a2is of the uDth #oint areC
[ ] & & 1 ,
T
u
e )::+
All #oints in the kine1atic chain are revolute, so thatC
1, 1, :
u
u n ! ):$+
:,$, A33roach fro1 7:8, 7$8
/eferences 7:8 and 7$8 3ro3ose discreti6ation of
each of n! fle2i*le se1ents so that they are divided into
t5o e4ual riid se1ents 5hich are interconnected *y one
cylindrical s3rin and one revolute s3rin 5ith the
corres3ondin riidity )see Fi, $c+, .his division results
in an o3en kine1atic chain 5ithout *ranchin 1ade of n!
riid se1ents connected *y the corres3ondin s3rins,
.he stiffnesses of s3rins in the #oints of the uDth se1ent
*ased on 7:8 and 7$8 areC
, ,
s s
i (i
T 3
i i
'A EI
c ! c
# #
):;+
5here the inde2 s isC
( ) 1 , 1, , 1, , s " ! i i n " ! + ):<+
.he lenth of the riid se1ents isC
: , ,
, ,
, ,
i
s i i
i
l " !
l l l " ! i n
l " ! i n
<
+ <
'
):%+
5here
1
, ,
: :
i i
i i
# #
l l
! !
+
):9+
.he local 3osition vector of the centre of 1ass of
the riid se1ents
u
c
#
, the local vectors of the riid
se1ents
u
#
, the 1ass of the riid se1ents
u
m
and the
1o1ent of inertia of the riid se1ent of constant 5idth in
relation to the a2is
u
c
2
) 1, : u ! n + 1ay *e
deter1ined fro1 the e23ressions )1&+D)1;+, 5here
, i
i i s
l l l
are iven in ):%+ and ):9+,
$, E-=ENBA>!E A/0?>EM
/eference 718 and our a33roach use relative
coordinates for descri3tion of the syste1, 5hereas 7:8 and
7$8 use a*solute coordinates, .hat is the reason 5hy the
for1ation of differential e4uations of 1otion 5ill *e
3resented for the cases of usin relative coordinates )for
our a33roach and the a33roach in 718+ and a*solute
coordinates )for the a33roaches in 7:8 and 7$8+,
:7;i6oli<, #7=alini<
>rocee(in%* of VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart >a%e&-"'n( >a%e&
$,1, /elative coordinates
.he 3otential enery of the syste1 of s3rins in the
#oints readsC
:
:
F1
1
,
:
!n
c u u
u
c q
):E+
5here qu )uF1,G,:!n+ are relative #oint dis3lace1ents,
.he kinetic enery of the syste1 is
( )
: :
1 1
1
,
:
!n !n
T m q q
q &&
):(+
5here an overdot denotes the derivative 5ith res3ect to
ti1e, qF7q1,q:,G,q*!n8
T
is the vector of enerali6ed
coordinates and
( )
:
F
,
u u
u
T
!n
c c
T
u 4
u
m m 2
q q
_
+
,
r r
q e e
)$&+
the 1etric tensor coefficient of the inertia 1atri2 of the
syste1, For 1ore details see 7(8,
-n E4uation )$&+, mu is the 1ass of the uDth riid
se1ent in the chain,
u
4
2
is its a2ial 1o1ent of inertia
relative to the 3rinci3al a2is 5hich is 3er3endicular to the
3lane of *ea1 *endin, rcu is the vector of 3osition of the
centre of 1asses of the riid *ody )5u+ in relation to the
inertial fra1e Ay(, .he confiuration q$F7q1F&,G,q*!nF&8
T
in 5hich ( ) &,
u
q t &
( ) &
u
q t &&
)uF1,,,,,:!n+ corres3onds to
the e4uili*riu1 3osition of the fle2i*le *ea1 sho5n in Fi,
; in the a*sence of ravity and force at the free end of the
*ea1 ?, >ineari6ed differential e4uations of 1otion of the
considered syste1 of riid *odies in the surroundins of
the e4uili*riu1 3osition read )see 7E8+C
: 1
,
n
+ %q Kq $ &&
)$1+
5here $:n1/
:!n1
,
1 :
) ,,,,, +
!n
diag c c K is the stiffness
1atri2, and %/
:!n:!n
is the 1ass 1atri2, 5hose 1e1*ers
areC
( )
( ) ( )
& &
:
&
F
:
& &
, ) , 1, : +,
u u
u
T
!n
c c
u
u
!n
T
4
u
m m
q q
2 !n
_ _
, ,
+
q q
r r
q
e q e q
)$:+
.he 3artial derivative of the 3osition vector rcu relative to
enerali6ed coordinate q
+
_
+
,
_
+ <
'
,
+
>
q
e q# q # q
r
e q
e q# q e q
$
)$$+
$,:, A*solute coordinates
.he 3otential enery of the syste1 of s3rins in the
#oints readsC
( )
: :
F1
1
,
:
v v
!n
c 3 v T v
v
c c y +
)$;+
5here 67v and 6yv are relative #oint dis3lace1ents 5hich,
e23ressed as a function of a*solute coordinates, readC
1
,
v v v
)$<+
1 1 1 & &
, &, &,
v v v v v v v
y y (l y (r y
)$%+
,
v
v c
(l ,
v
v v c
(r l
)$9+
.he a*solute coordinates
v
y
and
v
re3resent
transverse dis3lace1ents of the centres of 1asses and
rotation a*out that centres of the vDth riid se1ent in
relation to the hori6ontal 3osition, res3ectively, A2ial
dis3lace1ents of the centres of 1asses of the vDth riid
se1ent are nelected *ecause of the assu13tion of s1all
defor1ations of the *ea1,
.he kinetic enery of the syste1 is
( )
: :
1
1
,
:
v
!n
v v c v
v
T m y 2
& &
)$E+
5here an overdot denotes the derivative 5ith res3ect to
ti1e, ?y a33lyin the >arane e4uations of the second
kind for the case of conservative syste1s,
&,
v v
d # #
dt y y
_
,
&
&,
v v
d # #
dt
_
,
&
)$(+
5here 1, , v ! n and # T is the >arane function,
differential e4uations of 1otion of the 1echanical syste1
are o*tained in the for1C
: 1
,
!n
+ %& K& $ &&
);&+
5here $:!n1/
:!n1
, &F7&1, &:,G,&!n8
.
is the vector of
a*solute coordinates, and it holds that &vF7yv, Hv8
.
)vF1,
G,!n+,
.he 1ass 1atri2 isC
1,1 :,: ,
) , ,,,,, +,
!n !n
diag %' % % %
);1+
5hereC
( )
, v
, ,
v
v v c
diag m 2
%
);:+
.he stiffness 1atri2 isC
1,1
1, 1 1,
, 1 , , 1
1, 1, 1
,
,, & & & ,, &
,, ,, C C C C C
& ,, & ,, &
& ,, ,, & ,
& ,, & ,, &
C CC C C C CC C
& ,, & & & ,,
v v v v
v v v v v v
v v v v
!n !n
+
+ + +
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
K
K K
K K K K
K K
K
);$+
5hereC
1 1
1 1
1
v, v 1
1 1
,
v v
v v v
T T v
T v 3 T v v
c c (r
c (l c c (r (l
1
+
1
]
K
);;+
1 1
1
1
1
,
: :
,
v v v v
v v
v v
v v
T T T v T v
3 3
T v T v
T v T v
c c c (l c (r
c c
c (l c (r
c (l c (r
+ + 1
1
+
1
+
1
+ +
1
]
K
);<+
1
, 1
1
,
v v
v v v
T T v
v v
T v 3 T v v
c c (l
c (r c c (l (r
+
+
+
1
1
+
1
]
K
);%+
For 1ore details, see 7:8 or 7$8,
;at!ral fre?!encie* of a ta$ere( cantilever bea9 of con*tant thic6ne** an( linearly ta$ere( @i(th
VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart $a%e&-"'n( $a%e&
Finally, the eienvalue 3ro*le1, for1ulated on the *asis of
)$1+ and );&+, readsC
( )
:
: 1
,
!n
K( % v $
);9+
5here is the natural fre4uency of free vi*ration of the
fle2i*le ta3ered cantilever *ea1, and v.
:!n1
re3resents
the eienvector 5hich corres3onds to the iven fre4uency,
A33ro2i1ate values of natural fre4uencies of the
considered cantilever *ea1 are o*tained *y solvin the
eienvalue 3ro*le1 );9+,
;, N!ME/-CA> EIAMA>E AN' BE/-F-CA.-0N 0F
.JE ME.J0'
Berification of the efficiency of the 3resented
1ethod 5ill *e 3erfor1ed throuh t5o e2a13les, .he first
e2a13le 5ill treat the 3ro*le1 of deter1ination of natural
fre4uencies of the fle2i*le cantilever *ea1 5ith three
ste33ed chanes of the circular cross section, .hus,
3ri1ary division is carried out in advance, so that nF;, and
the influence of secondary divisions of the *ea1 on the
accuracy of our 1ethod 5ill *e analy6ed, E2act values of
natural fre4uencies of such a *ea1 are deter1ined in 7;8,
so it is a ood e2a13le for co13arin the accuracy of the
3ro3osed a33roach 5ith the relevant a33roaches 3resented
in 718 and 7:8, .he second e2a13le analy6es the ta3ered
cantilever *ea1 of a rectanular cross section, constant
thickness and linearly varia*le 5idth, .he influence of
3ri1ary division on the accuracy of our 1ethod 5ill *e
analy6ed in this e2a13le, .he results achieved *y usin
our a33roach 5ill *e co13ared 5ith the results fro1 7<8,
;,1, E2a13le 1
>et us o*serve the fle2i*le cantilever *ea1 5ith three
ste33ed chanes of the circular cross section 5ith the
follo5in characteristicsC
D @ounKs 1odulusC
: 11
L 1& &%E , : m 8 E ,
D 1ass densityC
$
9E<& L , !g m
D total lenthC
m # & , :
,
D dia1eterC
1
&,&$ , d m
D
dia1eters ratioC
: 1
L &,E d d
%< , & L
1 $
d d , :< , & L
1 ;
d d ,
D lenth of the se1entsC
# # :< , &
1
,
# # $ , &
:
, # # :< , &
$
,
;
&,: , # #
Darea of the cross section of the se1ent after 3ri1ary
division of the *ea1C
:
,
;
u
u
d
A
);(+
.a*le : ives the values of the first three nonD
di1ensional fre4uencies, 5here the value of the 3ara1eter
c chanes fro1 & to 1, 5ith the ste3 &,1, and for nF1& and
nF:&, res3ectively, -t can *e noticed that there is very ood
aree1ent *et5een our results and the results fro1 7<8, -t
is o*vious that the converence of fre4uency to5ard the
values fro1 7<8 is faster at s1aller values of the 3ara1eter
c, i,e, 5hen the *ea1 is less ta3ered )see Fi, % and Fi, 9+,
-n that case it is enouh for the nu1*er of se1ents of
constant 5idth )3ri1ary divisions+ to *e nF1&, and to
achieve the satisfactory accuracy,
Table %& 8atural frequencies of the cantilever beam : comparison of the present paper results and the results from /10
Nu1*er
of
divisions
NonDdi1ensional fre4uency coefficients
1
#
:
#
$
#
/elative error 7M8 /elative error 7M8
/elative error 7M8
0ur
a33r,
A33r,
fro1
ref, 718
A33r,
fro1
ref, 7:8
0ur
a33r,
A33r,
fro1 ref,
718
A33r,
fro1
ref, 7:8
0ur
a33r,
A33r,
fro1
ref, 718
A33r,
fro1
ref, 7:8
1
:,<11<( :,<1&&& :,<%E1; ;,$1$1< ;,;$;1< ;,E9E;% <,;9;&$ <,9(((( %,1&$<1
&,&<( D&,&&; :,$1: D:,(9< D&,:<; (,9;1 D<,($E D&,$$9 ;,E9E
:
:,<1:&& :,;($(& :,<:$(% ;,;$1&& ;,;$E:% ;,<$191 <,9;:%9 <,99::& <,E%(:9
&,&9% D&,%;< &,<<: D&,$:; D&,1%1 1,(;1 D1,$:: D&,E1< &,E<$
$
:,<111; :,;(<:; :,<1%1: ;,;;1%& ;,;$E<< ;,;E:91 <,9E9E1 <,99$&; <,E;1&9
&,&;: D&,<(: &,:;& D&,&E% D&,1<< &,E$( D&,<;% D&,E&& &,$%(
<
:,<1&<1 :,;((&( :,<1:1$ ;,;;;9& ;,;;&&( ;,;<E$: <,E&E<% <,9E$19 <,E:%&%
&,&1% D&,;$( &,&E1 D&,&1% D&,1:& &,:(& D&,1(& D&,%:% &,111
9
:,<1&$& :,<&1<% :,<11&; ;,;;<1; ;,;;1:& ;,;<1%9 <,E1$E% <,9(&%; <,E:1E;
&,&&E D&,$;& &,&$9 D&,&&% D&,&(< &,1;1 D&,&(( D&,;(E &,&$E
1&
:,<1&1E :,<&$9< :,<1&;% ;,;;<:9 ;,;;::: ;,;;E1< <,E1%<E <,9(9%$ <,E1(<E
&,&&$ D&,:<$ &,&1; D&,&&$ D&,&9: &,&%1 D&,&<: D&,$9E D&,&&1
E2act
solution
7; 8
:,<1&1 ;,;;<;: <,E1(%1
;at!ral fre?!encie* of a ta$ere( cantilever bea9 of con*tant thic6ne** an( linearly ta$ere( @i(th
VIII International Conference Heavy Machinery-HM 2014, Zlatibor, 25-28 !ne 2014, "#tart $a%e&-"'n( $a%e&
$igure ;. Absolute error of natural frequency of& straight beam <c=>+ in comparison with /90
$igure ?. Absolute error of natural frequency of& maimum tapered beam <c=%+,
in comparison with /90
Table *& 8atural frequencies of the cantilever beam : comparison of the present paper results and the results from /90
c
NonDdi1ensional fre4uencies
1