Problem 1: Implementation of SAP would bring loss to ATLAM
As mentioned in the first meeting on Friday, 22 January 2002, the cost of
implementing SAP in ATLAM within 4 months towards the end of the financial year of 2001 is definitely high. It is impossible for ATLAM to bear the SAP cost without incurring a loss. The initial investment is detailed as follow: Initial investment RM Hardware 2,000,000.00 Initial software license 1,000,000.00 Training cost 1,271,550.00 Customization work 72,840.00 Total 4,344,390.00
Figure 1: SAP initial investment
Categorizing the SAP implementation as operating expenditure will definitely contribute to a high expense for ATLAM. Operating expenses will be recorded in the current periods income statement (profit and loss statement/ P&L) thus directly affected the performance of the company. Balance Sheet Income Statement Assets = Liabilities + Equity
Net Income = Revenue - Expenses - SAP expenses
Figure 2: SAP investment represented as operating expenditure
POSSIBLE SOLUTION 1. Recognize SAP as noncurrent asset (capitalize the expenditure) Since the SAP investment will have an economic benefit that extends beyond the end of the current fiscal year, the expenditure should be capitalized. This would mean that the SAP investment should be recognized wholly as a noncurrent asset. The method is further shown below in Figure 3: Asset Categorization RM Total Tangible noncurrent assets: Hardware Customization work Training cost 2,000,000.00 72,840.00 1,271,550.00
Although this categorization diversifies the noncurrent assets into intangible and tangible items, their representation in the balance sheet will be solely recognized as noncurrent asset. Figure 4 will show how it will be represented. Balance Sheet Income statement Assets = L + OE Net Income = Revenue - Expenses + SAP 4,344,390.00
Figure 4: SAP investment representation in balance sheet When expenditure is capitalized, assets will increase. Since the SAP investment will be considered as capital expenditure, the investment will not affect the profit and loss of the company (income statement). Rather, it will only be recorded as noncurrent asset and experience depreciation over its useful life.
2. Recognize the contribution of PETRA as the holding company Now that the expenses value has been capitalized, we should not leave the fact that PETRA as the holding company contribute more than 80% of the overall capital expenditure of ATLAM. This fact needs to be emphasized, as it would mean that ATLAM only bears minimum expenses of its organization thus bearing an even more minimum cost of implementing the SAP system.
3. Request training from holding company The SAP Business Support, who has been working on several SAP projects with PETRA units before, is now providing the training in ATLAM. It is estimated that the cost of training would sum up to RM 500,000 in the first year of SAP implementation. Requesting support from the skilled workers of PETRA will minimize the cost of using the experts of the SAP team itself.