The Natural Course of Atherosclerosis : Part I: Incidence and Progression
Print ISSN: 1079-5642. Online ISSN: 1524-4636 Copyright 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.19.6.1484 1999;19:1484-1490 Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. http://atvb.ahajournals.org/content/19/6/1484 World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
http://atvb.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/ at: is online Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Information about subscribing to Subscriptions:
http://www.lww.com/reprints Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints:
document. Question and Answer Permissions and Rights page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology in Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published Permissions: by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from The Natural Course of Atherosclerosis Part I: Incidence and Progression Stefan Kiechl, Johann Willeit, for the Bruneck Study Group AbstractThe natural course of early atherogenesis is not well established. The current prospective survey was designed to monitor 5-year changes in carotid atherosclerosis in a large, stratified random sample of the general population using high-resolution duplex ultrasound (Bruneck Study). Incidence rates of carotid atherosclerosis ranged from near zero to 184 per 1000 person-years. Most atherosclerotic lesions developed at sites with enhanced wall thickness. Incidence of atherosclerosis in premenopausal women was less than half of that observed in men of equal age. The sex difference disappeared within 5 years after menopause and may possibly be attributed to sex variations in body iron stores. Preexisting atherosclerotic lesions may experience 1 of 2 different types of disease progression. 1) The first main type of plaque growth causing nonstenotic or diffuse dilative atherosclerosis was characterized by slow and continuous plaque extension, which usually affected several lesions simultaneously and did not primarily focus on the carotid bifurcation. This step-by-step process relied on a cumulative exposure to well-known risk factors such as hyper- lipidemia. Compensatory enlargement of the artery at the site of active atherosclerosis effectively preserved a (near) normal lumen. 2) The second main type of plaque growth was characterized by occasional prominent increases in lesion size. This process primarily occurred in the internal carotid artery and was mediated by procoagulant risk factors in a way that peak levels were relevant rather than cumulative exposure. As the main underlying pathomechanism, atherothrombosis may be hypothesized. Marked increases in plaque size and insufficient vascular remodeling acted synergistically in producing a significant compromise of the lumen. The current study provides novel insights into the natural course of early carotid atherosclerosis, thereby focusing on disease incidence and various types of spontaneous disease progression. Nonstenotic or diffuse dilating atherosclerosis and focal stenotic disease were found to constitute epidemiologically and etiologically distinct disease entities that develop and proceed independently of each other. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1484-1490.) Key Words: carotid arteries
atherosclerosis
atherothrombosis
population study C ardiovascular disease is the leading source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in Western industrialised coun- tries, and atherosclerosis is unquestionably the main under- lying pathology. Current knowledge on incidence and course of atherosclerosis mainly originates from patient-based an- giographic and Doppler follow-up evaluations, which for methodological reasons are restricted to severe atherosclero- sis (stenosis). 14 In the late 1980s, advances in technique and resolution of duplex ultrasound scanning afforded the oppor- tunity to noninvasively quantify and monitor atherosclerosis from its precursor lesions to occlusive disease. The carotid arteries are an appropriate target for such evaluations on account of accessibility, size, and limited wall movement. High coincidence of carotid atherosclerosis with vessel pa- thology in other vascular territories makes it an adequate window for systemic atherosclerosis. 59 The Bruneck Study ranks among the few large ultrasound-based cohort stud- ies 1016 aimed at assessing incidence and natural course of early atherogenesis in the general population. Methods Population Recruitment The Bruneck Study is a prospective population-based survey on the epidemiology and etiology of carotid atherosclerosis. 16 The baseline examination was performed between July 1990 and November 1990 in the semi-urban mountainous area of Bruneck (Bolzano Province, Italy). Financial and personnel resources allowed us to recruit a random sample of up to 1000 subjects. To best utilize population size in terms of accurate sex- and age-specific rates of atherosclerosis incidence and progression, equal contingents of men and women (n125) in each the 5th to 8th decade were selected for inclusion. 16 In the choice of the follow-up interval, we were mainly guided by the objective of ascertaining a sufficient number of incident carotid stenoses as the ultrasound endpoint with the lowest rate of occur- rence. Extrapolation of cross-sectional data suggested that a follow-up period of 5 years suffices for this requirement. Accord- ingly, the first reevaluation was scheduled for July 1995 to October 1995. Participation and follow-up rates were high at 93.6% (91.9% with complete data assessment) and 96.5%, respectively. Study design, protocol, and characteristics of the survey area have been detailed previously. Received June 12, 1998; revision accepted November 30, 1998. From the Department of Neurology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria. Correspondence to Dr J. Willeit, Department of Neurology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstr. 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. is available at http://www.atvbaha.org 1484 by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from Scanning Protocol Sonographic assessment of the extracranial carotid arteries was performed using a duplex ultrasound system (ATL8, Advanced Technology Laboratories) with 10-MHz scanning frequency in B-mode and 5-MHz scanning frequency in pulsedDoppler mode. All subjects were examined in a supine position. The scanning protocol included imaging of the right and left common carotid arteries (CCA) and internal carotid arteries at the following loca- tions: proximal CCA (15 to 30 mm proximal to the carotid bulb), distal CCA (15 mm proximal to the carotid bulb), and proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) (carotid bulb, identified by loss of the parallel wall present in the CCA and the initial 10 mm of the vessel above the flow divider between external and internal carotid arter- ies). For each segment, the sonographer imaged the vessel in multiple longitudinal and transversal planes to identify the largest axial diameter of focal plaques and to adequately visualize the interface required to measure intima-media thickness (IMT). Pulsed Doppler was used to provide information on blood flow velocity and to identify the various arteries. Atherosclerotic lesions were defined by 2 ultrasound criteria: (1) wall surface (protrusion into the lumen or roughness of the arterial boundary) and (2) wall texture (echogenicity). We did not use an IMT cut-off to discriminate plaques from wall thickening. The maximum axial diameter of each plaque was measured as the distance from the leading edge of the lumen-intima interface to the leading edge of the media-adventitia interface. For the assess- ment of stenosis, Doppler criteria or, when no hemodynamic disturbances were detectable, the percentage of maximum diameter reduction in the B-mode images was applied. 17 Peak systolic velocities exceeding 180cm/s and 250cm/s were considered indica- tive of stenosis 60% and 80%, respectively. Scanning was per- formed twice, namely in 1990 and 1995, by the same experienced sonographer, who was unaware of the subjects clinical and labora- tory characteristics. For documentation purposes, short segments of real time ultrasonography and frozen longitudinal and transversal images were recorded for each vessel segment. Reproducibility, Validity, and Data Quality To assess the reproducibility of the ultrasound technique applied in the current evaluation, rescanning was performed in a representative subsample by the same sonographer (n100). To avoid memory effects, we left a waiting period of 6 to 8 weeks between both assessments. In all, 800 vessel segments and 180 plaques served as the basis for computation of intra-observer variability. Main focus was on the quantification of plaque diameters. Relative measurement errors that describe the intra-observer error as a percentage of the pooled mean were low at 10% (CCA) and 15% (ICA), which enabled us to monitor changes in atherosclerosis in individuals over time. In an attempt to subdivide the overall error into various components ee 1 2 e n 2 , we considered a variety of potential sources of bias: poor scanning quality, true changes in vascular status in the intervening period, administration error, attribution of lesions to neighboring segments, overseeing of hidden plaques, and the measurement error in its primary sense. Parallel rereading of the scans was performed to define the source of error responsible for deviations between both assessments. Poor scanning quality due to anatomical variations (high bifurcation, n1), real progression of atherosclerosis (1 of 180 plaques), and overseeing of adequately-sized lesions in 1 of the scannings (1 of 180 plaques) was rare and contributed little to overall error. At 0.1%, administration and input error were kept low by multiple checks of the database. Variable attribution of plaques to neighboring segments requires attention. Pitfalls mainly occurred in TABLE 1. Incidence and Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis According to Age, Sex, and Menopausal Status (n826) Incidence Men Premenopausal Women Postmenopausal Women Age Range (y) Incidence Rate Years of Follow-Up Incidence Rate Years of Follow-Up Incidence Rate Years of Follow-Up 4044 32.8 158.5 5.3 150.0 50.0 4.0 4549 51.1 270.0 13.4 239.0 48.6 53.5 5054 45.7 245.0 15.7 102.1 38.0 163.0 5559 47.1 148.5 13.3 15.0 61.7 181.5 6064 93.2 124.5
62.0 184.0 6569 118.6 72.5
59.9 137.0 7074 183.8 55.5
72.5 69.0 7579 170.5 30.5
74.7 37.5 8084 160.0 5.0
107.1 14.0 Progression Men Premenopausal Women Postmenopausal Women Age Range (y) Progression Rate Years of Follow-Up Progression Rate Years of Follow-Up Progression Rate Years of Follow-Up 4044 61.5 6.5 0.0 3.0
218.2 55.0 Incidence and progression rates were calculated per 1000 person-years. Incidence rates were assessed in subjects free of carotid atherosclerosis at the 1990 baseline (n500) and progression rates in those with preexisting atherosclerosis (n326). Kiechl and Willeit June 1999 1485 by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from the correct attribution of plaques to either the ICA or external carotid artery (4 of 118). In the CCA, lesions that approached or just crossed the limit between its distal and proximal section were occasionally counted twice (2 of 62). When this and all aforementioned sources of variability were eliminated, we arrived at the actual measurement error caused by physical limitations of the measuring device, lack of clear-cut interfaces, and the choice of distinct axes through lesions with complex shape. Rates were 8.5% (CCA) and 12.4% (ICA). To ensure that increases in plaque size during follow-up did not simply reflect measurement variability, only changes exceeding the doubled (overall) measurement error were regarded as true progression. At the lowest end of the plaque size distribution the above relative errors may not fit the data well. As neither surface nor texture criteria used in the definition of plaques are so-called hard criteria, counting of small lesions may ultimately depend on the investiga- tors judgment. Diagnostic shifts from wall thickening to atheroscle- rotic plaques and vice versa represent the main source of error in the quantification of such small lesions. Concordance of classifications markedly increased with lesion size and was near perfect (95%) for plaques exceeding 0.7 mm (CCA) and 1.1 mm (ICA). These limits were introduced in the definition of incident atherosclerosis as a minimum diameter requirement. Statistical Analysis Age-specific incidence/progression rates were assessed for age strata of 5 years each and expressed as incidence/progression of athero- sclerosis per 1000 person-years. Rates were calculated under the assumption of a consistent probability of incident/progressive ath- erosclerosis across the 5-year age intervals. Equal risks were allo- cated from the first to fifth year of follow-up; cases contributed, on average, 2.5 years of follow-up to the denominator of the incidence formula (for details see Reference 18). Cumulative rates were converted into cumulative risks by means of the formula P1-exp (- ). 18 Standardization of rates was performed according to the guidelines given by Breslow and Day. 18 Strength and type of association between cigarette smoking and various categories of atherosclerosis progression was assessed by logistic regression analysis (SPSS-X statistical software). 19 Results Tables 1 and 2 depict age-, sex-, and site-specific incidence rates of atherosclerosis. Premenopausal women showed ex- cellent protection against atherosclerosis, which was gradu- ally lost within a 5-year period after menopause along with prominent iron accumulation (Figure 1a). Thereafter, inci- dence rates were virtually identical in men and women of equal age (Tables 1 and 2), which results in a convergence of disease manifestation between sexes with advancing age (Figure 1b). Manifestation of 1 atherosclerotic lesion dur- ing the 5-year follow-up period was as frequent as the occurrence of a single plaque (percentage of subjects with 1, 2, 3, and 4 incident plaques: 57%, 27%, 12%, and 4%). Figure 2 describes disease activity as a function of preexisting atherosclerosis. For comparison purposes, rates were adjusted to the age/sex structure of the standard European population, 18 thereby obtaining 1 universal estimate of atherosclerosis incidence in the middle-aged and elderly (aged 40 to 84 years), which amounted to 69.9 per 1000 person-years. TABLE 2. Segment-Based Incidence and Progression Rates of Atherosclerosis in the CCA and ICA According to Age and Sex ICA: Age Range (y) Incidence of Atherosclerosis: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Incidence of Stenosis 40%: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Progression of Atherosclerosis: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Men Women Men Women Men Women 4044 9.5 (334) 1.9 (311) 33.3 (6) 0.0 (3) 35.7 (4) 0.0 (3) 4549 18.6 (569) 8.3 (601) 40.0 (15) 0.0 (2) 80.0 (15) 0.0 (3) 5054 23.6 (569) 14.0 (571) 25.3 (79) 0.0 (24) 75.1 (79) 24.0 (24) 5559 27.9 (394) 32.7 (447) 35.6 (112) 21.0 (48) 99.6 (112) 54.2 (48) 6064 59.4 (377) 31.5 (458) 37.3 (204) 31.2 (77) 95.9 (207) 98.7 (77) 6569 64.1 (231) 32.5 (388) 26.1 (245) 44.6 (170) 91.9 (215) 109.4 (170) 7074 88.2 (194) 69.7 (264) 31.3 (217) 23.7 (186) 103.5 (217) 104.3 (186) 7579 87.8 (153) 78.4 (171) 57.1 (210) 34.2 (135) 104.4 (210) 139.2 (135) 8084 102.4 (53) 69.0 (87) 34.5 (99) 29.3 (107) 124.9 (99) 115.1 (187) CCA: Age Incidence of Atherosclerosis: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Incidence of Stenosis 40%: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Progression of Atherosclerosis: Rate (Years of Follow-Up) Range (y) Men Women Men Women Men Women 4044 3.9 (674) 1.3 (628)
4549 7.6 (1160) 3.8 (1203)
5054 13.3 (1231) 3.1 (1183) 5.6 (72) 0.0 (7) 69.9 (72) 22.2 (7) 5559 11.1 (905) 11.5 (973) 8.3 (120) 0.0 (20) 66.7 (120) 60.0 (20) 6064 16.0 (974) 10.3 (1010) 15.8 (203) 0.0 (77) 52.2 (207) 65.3 (77) 6569 21.8 (735) 16.2 (963) 15.2 (222) 9.5 (126) 79.3 (222) 68.9 (126) 7074 21.8 (614) 27.8 (755) 15.5 (220) 12.3 (162) 97.4 (220) 89.1 (162) 7579 33.3 (450) 25.9 (455) 14.1 (262) 10.9 (164) 87.8 (262) 94.9 (164) 8084 42.6 (159) 39.2 (250) 14.1 (146) 14.5 (153) 100.0 (149) 106.2 (153) Incidence and progression rates were calculated per 1000 segment years. Incidence of atherosclerosis was assessed in segments free of atherosclerosis at the 1990 baseline. Progression rates of nonstenotic atherosclerosis and incidence rates of stenosis focused on segments with preexisting atherosclerosis (segment-based approach). The ICA was defined as the carotid bulbous and the initial 10 mm of the vessel. 1486 Natural Course of Atherosclerosis: Part I by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from Next, we focused on spontaneous progression of athero- sclerotic lesions. Plots of plaque growth against the lesion size ultimately achieved identified 2 distinct types of growth kinetics. Atherosclerosis that did not cause lumen obstruction 40% usually grew slowly and evoked (over)compensatory local dilation of vessel segments (Figure 3). In contrast, stenosis 40% usually originated from occasional marked increases in plaque size and insufficient or even lacking vascular remodelling (Figure 3). Both types of lesion pro- gression started from plaques of similar diameters (Figure 3; 1.3 versus 1.6 mm), with the distribution of changes in plaque size showing only minor overlap (mean [95%CI]: 1.1 mm [0.1 to 2.2 mm] versus 2.4 mm [1.3 to 3.6 mm]; P0.0001). Progression rates of nonstenotic atherosclerosis showed age- and sex-trends similar to those observed for incident athero- sclerosis (Tables 1 and 2) and an amplification of disease activity with an increasing number of preexisting plaques (Figure 2). In contrast, incidence rates of stenosis in middle- aged and elderly subjects emerged as independent of sex and age (Table 2). In most instances, nonstenotic atherogenesis manifested in several plaques simultaneously, whereas inci- dent stenosis usually occurred only once in the 5-year follow-up period (Figure 4). Further differences in the epide- miology of both processes are opposed in Table 3. The risk profile of nonstenotic atherosclerosis consisted of traditional risk factors (high LDL and low HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking) supplemented by less well- established risk conditions such as prominent body iron stores, 20,21 severe alcohol consumption, or chronic infections (unpublished data from the Bruneck Study). Stenotic athero- sclerosis emerged as a domain of a procoagulant state involving high fibrinogen and Lp(a), low antithrombin III and APC ratio (factor V mutation), and clinical conditions known to shift hemostasis toward coagulation. As to cigarette smok- ing, the risk of nonstenotic atherosclerosis was best described by measures of cumulative exposure (pack-years) (OR [95%CI], 1.26 [1.06 to 1.50] for a 1-standard deviation unit change) and did not normalize within a 5- to 10-year period after cessation (1.24 [1.03 to 1.49]). In contrast, peak levels of exposure (number of cigarettes currently smoked) were su- perior to cumulative measures in predicting the risk of stenotic atherosclerosis (2.57 [1.74 to 3.80]). After secession of smoking, the risk of focal stenotic disease normalized (OR for ex-smokers 1 to 5 years after cessation, 1.29 [0.33 to 5.04]). Discussion Initiation of Atherosclerosis Precursor lesions of atherosclerosis (intima-media thicken- ing) may occur as early as adolescence, but the frequency of definite atherosclerotic lesions remains low until age 40 in men and onset of menopause in women (prevalence 1.0% each). Protection against atherosclerosis in women was grad- ually lost within a 5-year period after menopause (Figure 1a). Afterward, incidence rates were virtually identical to those observed in men of equal age. In other words, atherogenesis in females usually started at higher ages than in men but proceeded at a similar pace once a postmenopausal period of 5 years had elapsed. Plots of cumulative risk rates in men and women best visualized the convergence in disease manifes- tation with advancing age (Figure 1b). Figure 1. a, Iron accumulation and incidence rates of carotid atherosclerosis before and 1 to 5, 5 to 10, and 10 years after menopause. The gure visualizes the temporal loss of female protection against atherosclerosis. Incidence rates were stan- dardized to the age-distribution of men in our population (40 to 59 years). b, Cumulative risk of carotid atherosclerosis in men and women. Figure 2. Age- and sex-standardized incidence and progression rates of carotid atherosclerosis according to the number of pre- existing plaques. Kiechl and Willeit June 1999 1487 by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from As detailed previously, differences in prevalence and incidence of carotid atherosclerosis evident between pre- menopausal women and men disappeared when sex varia- tions in body iron stores were taken into account. 20,21 Iron accumulation in (post)menopause corresponded excellently with the breakdown of female protection against atherogen- esis (Figure 1b). Growing epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests a crucial role of prominent iron stores in lipid-induced atherogenesis even though a general consensus in this field has not yet been reached. 22 As expected, the proximal ICA was the site of predilection for manifestation of atherosclerosis. In 1 out of 2 subjects with incident atherosclerosis, plaques occurred simulta- neously in 2 or more carotid segments. The risk of incident atherosclerosis amplified with size and number of preexisting lesions (Figure 2), which may well reflect a perpetuation of adverse risk profiles but could, speculatively, also point to some kind of auto-catalytic propagation of atherosclerosis. A previous investigation in this cohort yielded evidence of an (auto)-immune component in human atherogenesis and iden- tified heat-shock protein 65 as a potential target antigen. 23 Occasionally, plaques evolved as focal lesions within a normal vasculature. In most instances, however, atheroscle- rosis developed at sites with an IMT beyond the 50th percentile (ICA, 88.8%; CCA, 97.8%). Thus, our survey supported the view that wall thickening commonly precedes definite atherosclerosis, possibly in the sense of a precursor lesion of one and the same disease process. Progression of Atherosclerosis From a pathoanatomical perspective, 2 distinct types of atherosclerosis progression may be distinguished: 1) In small and medium-sized lesions slow and continuous plaque growth predominates, which is mediated by a variety of complex biological step-by-step phenomena such as lipid- induced atherogenesis or smooth muscle cell proliferation. 2) This type of plaque growth may be occasionally accelerated by plaque fissuring, thrombosis and fibrous organization of mural thrombi. 24,25 The latter mechanism, further on referred to as plaque thrombosis, gains increasing weight with advanc- ing lesion size and may even be the key event in the development of stenotic lesions. A comprehensive discussion of the dualism of conventional atherosclerosis and athero- thrombosis in human vessel pathology is given by Fuster et al 26 and Badimon et al. 27 The current prospective survey provides strong in vivo support for this concept and suggests that a shift in the relevance of both pathomechanisms occurs when a plaque causes 40% diameter reduction (Figure 3 and Table 3). Nonstenotic atherosclerosis expanded slowly (Figure 3). Such processes usually paralleled in several atherosclerotic lesions independently of plaque location (Figure 4), ie, they were a continuous and ubiquitous process. In analogy to the initiation of atherosclerosis, the risk of disease progression amplified with advancing age and number of atherosclerotic lesions (Figure 2). Once more than 3 plaques preexisted in a single subject, further disease extension was an almost obligatory phenomenon (78%), which reinforces the possibil- ity of an auto-catalytic component in this type of atherogen- esis. Compensatory enlargement of the vessel at the site of active atherosclerosis effectively preserved a normal lumen or was even over-compensatory in the early course of disease (see Part II: Vascular Remodeling). Diffuse dilative athero- Figure 3. Growth kinetics of plaques and vascular remodelling (compensatory dilation of vessels) according to the degree of lumen obstruction (% diameter stenosis). Diameters were adjusted for age and sex. This graph shows a marked increase in plaque growth and a decrease in compensatory vessel dilation at a cut-off of 40%. Vessel diameter, average change in vessel diameter between 1990 and 1995 (in mm). Figure 4. Number of preexisting plaques involved in nonstenot- ic and stenotic atherogenesis. This graph shows that nonstenot- ic atherogenesis usually manifested in more than 1 plaque of given subjects whereas stenotic atherogenesis was a focal dis- ease which usually occurred only once in the 5-year follow-up period. 1488 Natural Course of Atherosclerosis: Part I by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from sclerosis may be assumed as a final stage of this type of disease progression. In contrast, stenosis 40% usually developed focally at sites of high hemodynamic stress (ICA) based on occasional marked increases in plaque size (mean, 2.4 mm). Subjects with preexisting stenotic disease were at a clearly elevated risk of developing a further stenosis in a different segment of the carotid arteries (23 of 55 [41.8%]). On the other hand, such events appeared to be so rare that manifestation of more than 1 stenosis during the 5-year follow-up period was definitely the exception and not the rule (Figure 4). Compen- satory enlargement of the vessel as typical for nonstenotic atherosclerosis did not occur at all or only insufficiently, which acted synergistically with the rapid growth pattern in producing significant lumen compromise (Figure 3). Actu- ally, 95% of stenosis 40% arose from this synergism. Carotid stenosis did not develop before age 45 in men and 55 in women. Thereafter, segment-based incidence rates were constant across the whole age range and in sexes (Table 2). The higher prevalence of stenosis in men is thus not a consequence of enhanced disease activity but simply reflects the higher prevalence of nonstenotic atherosclerotic lesions at risk of stenotic transformation. Lack of a significant age trend, which at first glance may surprise, is explained by peculiarities in the etiology of stenosis. Consistent with the concept of underlying plaque thrombosis, this process pri- marily relied on procoagulant risk factors, most of which did not show prominent age-dependency. Both types of disease progression preferentially started from small- to medium-sized plaques of similar diameter. Stenotic atherosclerosis should not be viewed as a simple perpetuation of disease mechanisms relevant to early athero- genesis nor did it in most instances superimpose on advanced nonstenotic disease. Actually, both types of atherogenesis develop and proceed independently of each other (Table 3). Presentation of detailed risk profiles goes far beyond the scope of this article. Instead, we attempted to clarify main differences in the way risk factors relate to either type of disease progression using the example of cigarette smoking. The risk of nonstenotic atherosclerosis primarily relied on measures of cumulative smoking exposure and did not normalize within a 5- to 10-year period after cessation whereas peak levels of exposure appeared to be of signifi- cance for stenotic atherosclerosis. Consistent with a revers- ible pro-coagulant state, the risk of focal stenotic disease normalized after smoking cessation. Briefly, the risk profile of nonstenotic atherosclerosis consisted of traditional risk factors and that of stenotic atherosclerosis of markers of enhanced thrombotic activity, attenuated fibrinolysis, and clinical conditions known to interfere with coagulation. Regression A variety of angiographic and ultrasound follow-up evalua- tions outlined the possibility of spontaneous or drug-induced regression of increased IMT and atherosclerotic lesions. 2831 In our survey, long-lasting regression was quite rare (5.2% of all lesions, n45) and confined to lesions with signs of plaque hemorrhage (19 of 45 [42%]), healing of ulcerated atherosclerosis (2 of 45 [4%]), and disappearance of small plaques (18 of 45 [40%]). Limitations and Merits of the Study Design 1) Accuracy of descriptive epidemiologic data mainly de- pends on the choice of an appropriate study population and the sample size. The current cohort was a random sample of the general population with a near complete follow-up (96.5%) and an observation period of more than 33 000 segment-years (4000 person-years). 2) The progression model developed and applied in the current study permitted us to monitor and characterize changes in vascular status in individuals (person-based approach), which is a clear advan- tage over the more commonly used approach of assessing changes in IMT over time. 3) Ultrasound evaluations were performed twice, namely in 1990 and 1995. Systematic interim scanning was not available. Thus, we cannot con- struct precise growth curves of atherosclerotic lesions. In particular, it remains to be elucidated whether slow plaque growth stands for a continuous or stepwise process or for successive plaque propagation and repair (regression) with progression overweight. TABLE 3. Distinct Epidemiology and Etiology of Nonstenotic and Stenotic Carotid Atherosclerosis in the Bruneck Study Cohort (1990 to 1995) (n826) Nonstenotic Atherosclerosis Diffuse Dilative Atherosclerosis Stenotic Atherosclerosis Focal Stenotic Disease Site of predilection Ubiquitous Internal carotid artery (bulbous) Plaque growth Slow, continuous and diffuse growth Focal rapid plaque extension with long interictal periods Vascular remodeling Prominent or even over-compensatory Insufficient or even lacking Risk profile Hyperlipidemia (cofactor body iron stores), hypertension, smoking Procoagulant state Association with risk factors Cumulative Peak levels Suspected pathological sequela Conventional atherogenesis (step-by-step mechanisms) Plaque thrombosis Both types of atherosclerosis develop and proceed independently of each other. Of subjects with 1 atherosclerotic lesion at the 1990 baseline (n219) 131 showed nonstenotic plaque growth and 88 did not. In both groups, the percentage of subjects with incident stenosis 40% was strikingly similar at 38.6% and 37.4% ( 2 0.03, P0.85; coefficient 0.01, P0.91). Kiechl and Willeit June 1999 1489 by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from Conclusions The current study may well be the first to provide population- based incidence rates of carotid atherosclerosis and detailed insights into the course of early disease progression. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the nature of atherogenesis and possibly assist in clinical decision making. Atherogenesis was found to be a heterogeneous disease that subsumes epidemiologically and etiologically distinct disease entities. Fighting the same risk factors in all individuals, as is common clinical practice, ignores the actual complexity of the disease. Appendix The Bruneck Study Group Georg Egger, Martin Oberhollenzer, Friedrich Oberhollenzer, Stefan Brandt, Paula Eder, Klaus Oberlechner, Harald Steiner, Arno Gas- peri: Department of Internal Medicine, Bruneck Hospital, Italy; Agnes Mair, Peter Santer: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Bruneck Hospital, Italy; Gregor Rungger, Franz Spogler: Depart- ment of Neurology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Austria; Elmar Jarosch, Maria Schober: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inns- bruck University Hospital, Austria; Christian Wiedermann: Depart- ment of Internal Medicine, Innsbruck University Hospital, Austria; Enzo Bonora, Michele Muggeo: Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Verona University Hospital, Italy. References 1. Pearson TA. Coronary arteriography in the study of the epidemiology of coronary artery disease. Epidemiol Rev. 1984;6:140166. 2. Hennerici M, Aulich A, Sandmann W, Freund HJ. Incidence of asymp- tomatic extracranial arterial disease. Stroke. 1981;12:750758. 3. Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Jager KA, Primozich JF, Beach KW, Phillips DJ, Strandness DE Jr. The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. Stroke. 1984;15:605613. 4. Autret A, Pourcelot L, Saudeau D, Marchal C, Bertrand P, de Boisvilliers S. Stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1987;1:888890. 5. Young W, Gofman JW, Tandy R, Malamud N, Waters ESG. The quan- tification of atherosclerosis, III: the extent of correlation of degrees of atherosclerosis within and between the coronary and cerebral vascular beds. Am J Cardiol. 1960;6:300308. 6. Solberg LA, McGarry PA, Moossy J, Strong JP, Tejada C, Loken AC. Severity of atherosclerosis in cerebral arteries, coronary arteries, and aortas. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968;149:956973. 7. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, Kahl FR, McKinney WM, Toole JF, McMahan MR, Thompson CJ, Heiss G, Crouse JR. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis: a case-control study. Circulation. 1990;82:12301242. 8. Wofford JL, Kahl FR, Howard GR, McKinney WM, Toole JF, Crouse JR. Relation of extent of extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis as measured by B-mode ultrasound to the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:17861794. 9. Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and lower extremity arterial atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:18851891. 10. The ARIC Investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129: 687702. 11. Fine-Edelstein JS, Wolf PA, OLeary DH, Poehlman H, Belanger AJ, Kase CS, DAgostino RB. Precursors of extracranial carotid atheroscle- rosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1994;44:10461050. 12. Salonen R, Seppanen K, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT. Prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis and serum cholesterol levels in eastern Finland. Arterio- sclerosis. 1988;8:788792. 13. OLeary DH, Polak JF, Wolfson SK Jr, Bond MG, Bommer W, Sheth S, Psaty BM, Sharrett AR, Manolio TA. Use of sonography to evaluate carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1991;22:11551163. 14. Bots ML, Breslau PJ, Briet E, de Bruyn AM, von Vliet HH, van den Ouweland FA, de Jong PT, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Cardiovascular determinants of carotid artery disease: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Hypertension. 1992;19:717720. 15. Bonithon-Kopp C, Touboul PJ, Berr C, Leroux C, Mainard F, Courbon D, Ducimetie`re P. Relation of intima-media thickness to atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries: the Vascular Aging (EVA) Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:310316. 16. Willeit J, Kiechl S. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid atherosclerosis: a population-based study. Arte- rioscler Thromb. 1993;13:661668. 17. Bluth EI, Stavros AT, Marich KW, Wetzner SM, Aufrichtig D, Baker JD. Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for stan- dardized imaging and Doppler criteria. Radiographics. 1988;8:487506. 18. Breslow NE, Day NE. The design and analysis of cohort studies. In: Breslow NE, Day NE, eds. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. 19. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988. 20. Kiechl S, Aichner F, Gerstenbrand F, Egger G, Mair A, Rungger G, Spogler F, Jarosch E, Oberhollenzer F, Willeit J. Body iron stores and presence of carotid atherosclerosis: a population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:16251630. 21. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Egger G, Poewe W, Oberhollenzer F. Body iron stores and the risk of carotid atherosclerosis: prospective results from the Bruneck Study. Circulation. 1997;96:33003307. 22. Gillum RF. Body iron stores and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1997;96: 32613263. 23. Xu Q, Willeit J, Marosi M, Kleindienst R, Oberhollenzer F, Kiechl S, Stulnig T, Luef G, Wick G. Association of serum antibodies to heat-shock protein 65 with carotid atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1993;341:255259. 24. Davies MJ, Bland JM, Hangartner JRW, Angelini A, Thomas AC. Factors influencing the presence or absence of acute coronary artery thrombi in sudden ischemic death. Eur Heart. 1989;10:203208. 25. Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death: autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis with peripheral embolization culminating in total vascular occlusion. Circulation. 1985;71:699708. 26. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242250, 310318. 27. Badimon JJ, Fuster V, Chesebro JH, Badimon L. Coronary atherosclero- sis: a multifactorial disease. Circulation. 1993;87:II-3II-16. 28. Margitic SE, Bond MG, Crouse JR, Furberg CD, Probstfield JL. Pro- gression and regression of carotid atherosclerosis in clinical trials. Arte- rioscler Thromb. 1992;12:114119. 29. Furberg CD, Adams HP Jr, Applegate WB, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Hartwell T, Hunninghake DB, Lefkowitz DS, Prostfield J, Riley WA, Young B. Effect of lovastatin on early carotid atherosclerosis and car- diovascular events. Circulation. 1994;90:16791687. 30. Crouse JR, Byington RP, Bond MG, Espeland MA, Craven TE, Sprinkle JW, McGovern ME, Furberg CD. Pravastatin, lipids, and atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries (PLAC-II). Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:455459. 31. Blankenhorn DH, Selzer RH, Crawford DW, Barth JD, Liu CH, Mack WJ, Alaupovic P. Beneficial effects of colestipol-niacin therapy on the common carotid artery: two- and four-year reduction of intima-media thickness measured by ultrasound. Circulation. 1993;88:2228. 1490 Natural Course of Atherosclerosis: Part I by guest on December 2, 2012 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from