Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Sulfonation has a major function in modulating the biological activities of a wide
number of endogenous and foreign chemicals, including: drugs, toxic chemicals,
hormones, and neurotransmitters. The activation as well as inactivation of many
xenobiotics and endogenous compounds occurs via sulfonation. The process is
catalyzed by members of the cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) superfamily consisting
of at least ten functional genes in humans. The reaction in intact cells may be reversed
by arylsulafatase present in the endoplasmic reticulum. Under physiological
conditions, sulfonation is regulated, in part, by the supply of the co-substrate/donor
molecule 3'-phosphadensoine-5-phosphosulfate (PAPS), and transport mechanisms by
which sulfonated conjugates enter and leave cells. Variation in the response of
individuals to certain drugs and toxic chemicals may be related to genetic
polymorphisms documented to occur in each of the above pathways. Sulfonation
has a major function in regulating the endocrine status of an individual by modulating
the receptor activity of estrogens and androgens, steroid biosynthesis, and the
metabolism of catecholamines and iodothyronines Sulfonation is a key reaction in the
body's defense against injurious chemicals and may have a major function during
early development since SULTs are highly expressed in the human fetus. As with
824
KaufTman
many Phase I and Phase II reactions, sulfonation may also serve as the terminal step in
activating certain dietary and environmental agents to very reactive toxic
intermediates implicated in carcinogenesis.
Key Words: Sulfonation; Sulfation; Sulfotransferase; SULT; Sulfatase; PAPS.
INTRODUCTION
Sulfonation of low molecular weight compounds catalyzed by members of the
cytosolic sulfotransferase multigene family (SULT) is an important determinant of the
pharmacology and toxicology of a vast array of endogeneous and foreign chemicals
(Coughtrie, 2002; Strott, 2002). This pathway involves the transfer of a sulfonate group
(S0''~) from the universal donor 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) to an
appropriate substrate. Sulfonated conjugates are often incorrectly referred to as
"sulfates" because the transfer of an SO^ ~ group to a hydroxyl acceptor creates an
SO"* ester. Various components of the sulfonation pathway are summarized in Fig. 1.
The sulfonation system resides primarily in cytosol but involves interaction with
-SO4"
/
^ P S Kinase
Sulfotransferase:SULT
- ROSO3"
Cytosol
Endoplasmic Reticulum
Sulfatase:ARSc
Figure 1. Scheme depicting interactions between various factors that influence the net formation
and transport of sulfonate esters from intact cells. Availability of the obligatory cofactory, PAPS, is
present at relatively low concentrations and may limit the synthesis of sulfonate conjugates
catalyzed by various SULTs. PAPS is formed via a single bifunctional enzyme that contains both
ATP sulfurylase and APS activities. Inorganic sulfate and two molecules of ATP are required for
each molecule of PAPS syntheisized. Sulfonate ester formation may also be reversed via the
hydrolytic enzyme arylsulfatas-c present in the endolplasmic reticulum. Sulfonate conjugates leave
and enter cells via specific specific transporters including mdr and organic acid transport molecules.
Inter-individual variation in each of the above enzymatic activities imposed by genetic and/or
environmental events may limit the process of sulfonation intact cells and organs.
825
826
KaufTman
sequences. SULTl and SULT2 families are the largest and are responsible for
sulfonating the greatest number of endogenous and foreign, compounds. There are
currently 11 known isoforms of human SULT enzymes representing the SULTl,
SULT2, and SULT4 families (Coughtrie, 2002). These are products of 10 genes, with
alternate splicing occurring with the first exon of the SULT2B1 gene as reviewed in
(Weinshilboum et al., 1997). The expression of SULTs is carefully regulated in terms
of tissue type, development, and hormonal regulation. Some of the properties of known
human SULT isoforms with regard to major sites of expression and specificities for
endogenous and xenobiotic substrates are summarized in recent reviews by Coughtrie
and his colleagues (Coughtrie, 2002; Coughtrie et al., 1998). Despite considerable
research, endobiotic and xenobiotic ligands for a number of SULT isoforms remain to
be identified. An interesting example here is the failure to identify substrates for a
highly conserved protein (SULT4A1) identified from the expressed sequence database
that appears to be expressed only in mammalian brain (Falany et al., 2000; Liyou et al.,
2003; Sakakibara et al., 2002). This protein is prominent in a number of brain
structures including the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, pituitary, and brainstem of rats and
humans; however to date, no endogenous nor xenobiotic substrate has yet been
identified for SULT4A1.
PHARMACOGENTICS
Inter-individual variation in expression of SULT isoforms that have pharmacological and toxicological significance in humans are well established [for reviews see
(Coughtrie, 2002; Weinshilboum and Aksoy, 1994)]. Considerable information exists
concerning the molecular basis underlying variation in SULT activities, and a number
of molecular epidemiological studies linking SULT polymorphisms to disease
susceptibility have appeared (Bamber et al., 2001; Seth et al., 2000; Zheng et al.,
2001). Pioneering studies carried out by Weinshilboum and his colleagues showed that
platelet phenol sulfotransferase activity and thermal stability were related to SULTIAl
genotype (Haenen et al., 1991; Weinshilboum and Aksoy, 1994). The availability of a
simple colorimetric assay, and the presence of thermal stable and thermal labile forms
of phenol sulfotransferase in platelets, an easily accessible tissue, opened the possibility
of initiating studies into the heritability of biochemically distinct forms of SULT. Early
studies employing biochemical measurements showed that genetically determined
variation in the thermal stability of phenol sulfotransferase in platelets correlated with
individual differences in sulfonation of acetaminophen after oral administration (Reiter
and Weinshilboum, 1982). Using 4-nitrophenol as a substrate, Raftogianis et al. (1997)
observed more than a 50-fold variation in the activity of phenol sulfotransferase from
905 subjects. This enzyme, now known as SULTIAl, is a "broad spectrum"
sulfotransferase involved in the metabolism and detoxification of many drugs and other
foreign chemicals as well as the bioactivation of many dietary and environmental
procarcinogens (Coughtrie and Johnston, 2001; Glatt et al., 2000).
Given its historical backgound and broad substrate specificity, SULTIAl is the
most widely studied polymorphic sulfotransferase. Subsequent to the earlier
biochemical studies, molecular cloning of human SULTIAl cDNAs indicated that
variation in thermal stability and activity are related to genetically determined variants
827
in the coding region of this enzyme in humans (Coughtrie, 2002; Weinshilboum and
Otterness, 1994). The two most common SULTIAl alleles, termed SULT1A1*1 and
SULT1A1*2, determined by gene sequencing studies involve a single amino acid
change at position 213. The allelic variant that possesses an arginine at position 213
(SULT1A1*1) is more thermostabile than the variant containing histadine at this
position (SULTIA 1*2) when using p-nitrophenol as substrate. Pioneering work by
Weinshilboum and his colleagues showed that platelet enzyme activity and thermal
stability were related to SULTIAl genotype. Individuals with the SULTIAl*2
genotype had significantly lower platelet activity than 1A1*1/1A1*2 heterozygotes or
1A1*1 homozygotes (Raftogianis et al., 1997). The reduced activity noted in
SULTIAl*2 genotypes is likely due to alterations in amounts of expressed enzyme
since kinetic properties of recombinant SULTIAl isoforms failed to demonstrate
reduced activity of the 1A1*2 allozyme (Li et al., 2001; Tabrett and Coughtrie, 2003).
A reduced biological half-life due to enhanced proteosomal degradation has been
suggested as a possible mechanism accounting for low amounts of the SULTIAl*2
allozyme (Coughtrie, 2002).
The occurrence of a common functional polymorphism in SULTIAl has
stimulated a number of molecular epidemiological studies attempting to link individual
variation in SULTIAl activity with certain pathologies notably breast (Nowell et al.,
2002a; Saintot et al., 2003; Seth et al., 2000; Zheng et al., 2001), colon (Bamber et al.,
2001; Liang et al., 2003), prostate (Nowell et al., 2004), and lung (Liang et al., 2003)
cancers. Although these studies have produced confiicting results, they are valuable in
identifying associations that may occur between certain physiological factors, life
styles, and SULTIAl genotypes. For example, a significant increase in the frequency
of the wild type allele, SULTlAl*l, was noted in older individuals in a small
population-based study suggesting that the high sulfonation phenotype provided
protection against long term tissue damage arising from exposures to endogenous
chemicals or xenobiotcs with aging (Coughtrie et al., 1999). In contrast, several case
control studies concerning the onset of various cancers mentioned above suggest an
association between the high activity SULT1A]*1 allele and heightened risk of these
diseases in human populations. There is at least one study indicating that homozygosity
for the SULT]A1*2 allele slightly reduced the risk for colorectal cancer (Nowell
et al., 2002b).
A potential link between high activity and SULTIAl and increased risk from
certain dietary constituents has been suggested. A large number of environmental
mutagens and carcinogens, such as heterocyclic amines contained in well done meat,
are activated by sulfotransferases (Glatt, 2000) . The risk of early-onset breast cancer as
well as the occurrence of other tumors may be increased in individuals having higher
amounts the SULTIAl allele compared to controls (Seth et al., 2000). Several studies
suggesting that variations in SULTIAl alleles contribute to the risk of breast (Zheng
et al., 2001) and prostate (Nowell et al., 2004) cancer implied that risk to these cancers
was increased by the consumption of well done meats. Findings such as these, as well
as those of other studies, emphasize the importance of considering associations between
host/environmental factors and SULTIAl genotypes in relation to ultimate biological outcomes.
The functional significance of polymorphisms in other members of the SULTl
family have been given much less attention than those noted in SULTIAl; however.
828
Kauffman
829
Iodothyronines
SULTIAl
Ascorbic acid
Vitamin D
SULTIAl
SULT2A1
Cholesterol
SULT2Blb
Estrogens
Dhydroepiandrosterone
SULT2A1
Androgens
Neurosteroids
SULTIAl
SULT2A1
Bile acids
SULT2A1
Xenobiotics
Drugs
Acetaminophen
Apomorphine
Butesonide
Ethinylestradiol
Minoxidil
SULTIAl
SULTIAl, 1A2,
1A3, lEl
SULT2A1
SULTIAl
SULTIAl, lCl
Tamoxifen
SULTIAl
Dietary constituents
Curcumin
Flavonoids
SULTIAl, IA3
SULTIAl, 1A3, lCl
Epicatachin
SULTIAl, 1A3
Reference
830
Kauffman
Table 1.
Substrate
Toxic chemicals
Pro-carcinogens
Aliphatic and
benzylic alcohols
Alkenylbenzenes
Aromatic amines
and amides
Heterocyclic
aromatic amines
Polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons
Others
Perflorocarboxylic acids
Manganese
Continued.
SULT isoform
SULT2A1
SULTIAl
SULTIAl, SULTIC
SULTIAl
SULTIAl
Reference
(Miller and Surh, 1994)
(Duffel etal., 2001;
Glatt et al., 2000)
(Boberg et al., 1983)
(Glatt and Meinl, 2004;
King and Phillips, 1968;
Sakakibara et al., 1998)
(Buonarati et al., 1990;
Sugimura, 2002)
(Tiemersma et al., 2004;
Watabe etal., 1982)
(Witzmann et al., 1996)
(Ranasinghe et al., 2000)
Endogenous Chemicals
Sulfonation has been recognized as a pathway for catecholamine inactivation in
man and animals for at least 3 decades (Buu et al., 1981; Roth and Rivett, 1982), and it
has been estimated that as much as 10% of the metabolism of dopamine and
norepinephrine in brain may be inactivated by this pathway (Rivett et al., 1982;
Whittemore and Roth, 1985). Most catechois studied are substrates for SULT isoforms
lAl, 1A2, 1A3, and lBl (Taskinen et al., 2003). A functional genetic polymorphysim
recently reported for human SULT 1A3 has been associated with accelerated
degradation via a proteosomal-mediated process (Thomae et al., 2003). Authors of
this report raised the possibility that such changes may be related to inherited
alterations in catecholamine sulfonation in humans. Dopamine sulfate exists at much
higher concentrations in human plasma than dopamine and appears to arise mainly
from dietary biogneic amines and sulfonation of dopamine produced in the myenteric
plexus of the gastroinitestinal tract via SULTl A3 which is expressed in large amounts
in the gastrointestinal tract (Eisenhofer et al., 1999). It has been suggested that more
than 75% of dopamine sulfate present in the body is produced via this pathway which
serves as a "gut-blood" barrier for dietary biogenic amines and dopamine produced in
the myenteric plexus (Kester et al., 2002).
There is a growing awareness of the importance of sulfonation during human fetal
development. Many SULTs that are produced in high amounts in human fetal tissues
831
have been linked to important developmental processes (Coughtrie, 2002). For example, production of DHEA sulfate via SULT2A1 by the fetal adrenal is established as
a critical step in providing substrate for estrogen biosynthesis by the placenta during
pregnancy (Barker et al., 1994). Thyroid hormone bioavailability in the human fetus is
regulated, in part, by enzymatic deiodination and reversible sulfonation of
iodothyronines (Hume et al., 2001). Sulfonation of 3,3'-diiodothyronine was found to
correlate with SULTIAl in a wide range of fetal tissues suggesting that this isoform is
primarily responsible for sulfonation of this hormone in fetal tissues (Richard et al.,
2001). SULTIAl may serve an important defense mechanism in the fetus since other
metabolic pathways are very low or absent in fetal tissues, and the human fetus
produces very high amounts of iodothyronine sulfates (Coughtrie, 2002).
Cholesterol sulfate and DHEA sulfate are the two most abundant sterol sulfonates
in the human circulation (Strott and Higashi, 2003). Their concentrations overlap and
range between 2 to 6 [xM in blood; however, while blood levels of cholesterol sulfate
remain relatively constant throughout life, levels of DHEA sulfate peak at puberty and
decline with age (Orentreich et al., 1984). Much is known about the physiological
function of the former in contrast to DHEA sulfate which, in large, remains a mystery.
In contrast, considerable information exists concerning the role of cholesterol sulfate as
a regulatory molecule in a variety of processes, e.g., keratinocyte differentiation,
epidermal and platelet cell adhesion, sperm capacitation, blood clotting, and fibrinolysis
(Strott and Higashi, 2003). Both compounds are sulfonated by members of the SULT2
family, which are primarily involved in the conjugation of neutral steroids and sterols.
DHEA is considered as the primary substrate for SULTIAl, which is also referred to
as DHEA sulfotransferase or hydroxysulfotransferase (Nagata and Yamazoe, 2000).
SULT2B has been further divided into two isoforms derived from the same gene
(SULTIBI) differing in structure and substrate specificity; SULT2Bla and SULT2Blb
(Her et al., 1998). SULT2Blb acitively sulfonates cholesterol while SULT2Bla
sulfonates pregnenolone but not cholesterol (Fuda et al., 2002; Strott and Higashi,
2003). The recent finding that SULT2Blb is expressed in human platelets (Yanai et al.,
2004) enhances the opportunity to explore potential polymorphisms in this gene and
relationships to altered physiological processes regulated by cholesterol sulfate.
The term neurosteroids designates steroids that are newly synthesized from
cholesterol or other precursors in the nervous system, and are still present in substantial
amounts after removal of peripheral steroidogenic organs (Mensah-Nyagan et al.,
1999). Initial steps in the synthesis of neurosteroids from cholesterol involves of
number of cytochrome P450s localized in brain (Hojo et al., 2004; Shibuya et al.,
2003). Sulfonation in brain is particularly important because a variety of neurotransmitter systems including GABA (Baulieu, 1998; Sullivan and Moenter, 2003),
cholinergic (Rhodes et al., 1997), glutaminergic (Flood et al., 1999) and a-opioid
(Monnet et al., 1995) receptors are modulated by both free and sulfonated neurosteroids, often in opposing ways. For example, pregnenolone is a barbiturate-like agonist, whereas its sulfonated conjugates acts as a picrotoxin-like antagonist (Krueger and
Papadopoulos, 1992; Melchior and Allen, 1992). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate enhances acetylcholine release from the hippocampus while the unconjugated form does
not (Rhodes et al., 1996). Cellular action of both pregnenolone and DHEA sulfonates
has been associated with enhanced cognitive performance in mammalian and avian
species, (Meyer et al., 2002; Migues et al., 2002).
832
Kauffman
Specific SULT isoforms have been identified in brain; however, their localization
in neuronal cellular elements including glia and neurons remains largely undefined.
Unpublished work in our own laboratory indicates that SULTIAl is a major SULT
isoform in rat brain and is localized primarily in neurons, which agrees with earlier
immunohistochemical studies employing polyclonal antibodies to phenol sulftransferase
indicating that this enzyme is found in neurons of rat brain (Zou et al., 1990). This
isoform has been cloned from human hippocampal samples (Zhu et al., 1993). Activity
of SULTIAl is highest in the rat striatum suggesting that it has a primary role in
sulfonating dopamine in contrast to SULTl A3 which is believed to be the major SULT
isoform involved in dopamine sulfonation in human brain. Evidence for the presence of
other isoforms of SULT in brain is limited. Epxeriments using very high concentrations
of DHEA to test for the presence of SULTIAl (Aldred and Waring, 1999) likely
reflect SULTIAl, which is also capable of sulfonating high concentrations of DHEA.
The earliest report of the presence of a novel cDNA reflecting the brain specific
isoform SULT4A was cloned from rat and human brain (Falany et al., 2000).
Drugs
The diversity of drugs and other xenobiotics biotransformed by sulfonation reactions
has been recognized for many years (Mulder, 1981), and recent studies have greatly
expanded the range of compounds recognized as substrates for these reactions (Mulder and
Jakoby, 1990; Weinshilboum and Otterness, 1994). Examples of recent progress in this
field are illustrated by work on apomorphine (Thomas and Coughtrie, 2003) and
budesonide (Meloche et al., 2002). Apomorphine is a potent dopaminergic agonist used in
the treatment of Parkinson's disease (Hely et al., 2000) and more recently to treat erectile
dysfunction (Kalsi and Kell, 2004). Knowledge that sulfonation is the major route of
metabolism of apomorphine in humans (LeWitt, 2004) led to a study exploring the
metabolism of this drug via seven recombinant isoforms of human SULT (Thomas and
Coughtrie, 2003) SULT lAl, 1A2, 1A3, and lEl, all sulfonated apomorphine to some
extent. By correlating sulfonation of apomorphine in a bank of 27 human liver cytosols
toward SULT activity of either 4-nitrophenol (SULTIAl) or 17b-estradiol, the authors
showed that SULTIAl is the primary isoform responsible sulfonating apomorphine in
human liver. Further studies are required to determine if polymorphisms common in
SULTIAl are associated with variations in drug efficacy and toxicity in humans.
Budesonide is a synthetic glucocorticoid used to treat asthma, allergic reactions,
and infiammatory bowel disease (O'Connell, 2003). This compound is also being
explored in animal models as a novel chemopreventive agent against pulmonary tumors
(Estensen et al., 2004). The drug is distributed as a mixture of two epimers, 22R and
22S, which are metabolized to stereo-specific hydroxylated metabolites by CYP3A4
(Jonsson et al., 1995). In a study of the ability of seven recombinant human SULTs
only SULT2A1 was found capable of sulfonating butesonide (Meloche et al., 2002).
Epimeric forms of the drug also differed in respect to serving as a substrate for
SULT2A1 with the 22 R epimer being 3.5 fold faster than of the 22S epimer.
Dietary Constituents
Many natural and synthetic dietary chemicals are known to inhibit sulfotransferases
including SULTIAl, Suit 1 A3, SULTIEI (Coughtrie and Johnston, 2001). Many of
833
these inhibitors are polyphenols such as quereetin (Mesia-Vela and Kauffman, 2003;
Walle et al., 1995), ingredients in red wine (Jones et al., 1995), and tea and coffee
(Coughtrie et al., 1998). Tests with recombinant SULTl isofoms indicated that SULTs
lAl, 1A2, and 1A3 are inhibited to varying degrees by a wide range of dietary
polyphenols; however, the most potent inhibitors found in this class of chemicals were
epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin, and gallocatechin gallate (Coughtrie and Johnston,
2001). Further kinetic experiments in this same study indicated that inhibitory potency
toward each of the three isoforms varied considerably with SULTIAl being the most
sensitive. Ki values for epicatechin gallate and epigallocatechin gallate were 64 nm and
42 nm, respectively. Further studies to determine the possibility that compounds such
as the gallates in tea and coffee modulate variants of SULTIAl in human subjects in
vivo and the consequences of such effects would be valuable.
Toxic Chemicals
It is well established that sulfotransferases bioactivate a host of chemicals, many of
which are dietary constituents, to reactive intermediates that are implicated in
carcinogenesis. Much of our understanding of the involvement of reactive sulfuric acid
esters in chemical carcinogenesis stems from the pioneering work of James and
Elizabeth Miller (Miller, 1970). Examples of chemicals that are converted to DNA- and
protein adducting species by sulfonation include benzylic alcohols of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), estragole, safrole, as well as various hydoroxyarylamines, arylhydroxamic acids formed from heterocyclic amines found in cooked meat
and fish (Miller and Surh, 1994). A principle pathway for chemical carcinogenesis is
the formation of toxic and very reactive sulfuric acid esters that undergo heterocyclic
cleavage to generate sulfate ions and potent electrophiles that combine.avidly with
nucleophilic groups in cellular DNA and proteins. Much recent work in toxicology has
been devoted to defining the activation of various pro-carcinogens by specific SULT
isoforms (Glatt and Meinl, 2004; Glatt et al., 1995; Sakakibara et al., 1998). A recent
study of nitrofen, that had been used as a herbicide in Germany until its carcinogenic
and teratogenic activities were detected in rodents, illustrates the principle of using
genetically manipulated strains of Salmonella typhimuium to evaluate the role of
specific SULT isoforms in mutagenagenesis (Glatt and Meinl, 2004).
Further appreciation for the importance of sulfonation in toxicology comes from
the finding that a number of hydroxylated metabolites of polychlorinated biphenyls are
extremely potent inhibitors of SULTIEI with Ki's in the picomolar range (Kester et al.,
2000). Since SULTIEI is the primary enzyme responsible for inactivation of estrogens
in humans, the authors suggest that the endocrine disrupting effects of these ubiquitous
environmental pollutants occur via the high capacity of their hydroxylated metabolites
to inhibit estrogen sulfonation via SULTIAl.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
A major objective of this review was to emphasize the importance of sulfonation in
the biotransformation of a large array of small molecules that are the focus of
pharmacology and toxicology. This process modulates the activities of many endogenous
molecules including steroid hormones and neurotransmitters, and may have a special
834
Kauffman
function during fetal and early postnatal life including biotransformation of many
endogenous and foreign chemicals. It will be important to gain further understanding of
mechanisms regulating the expression of various elements of the sulfonation system and
the physiological consequences of alterations in this system during early life.
Evidence collected over the last decade suggest that sulfonation is critical to
regulating the actions of steroids within the central nervous system. Important questions
concerning mechanisms regulating the expression of various elements of the sulfonation
system in brain and other tissues remain to be answered. Some elements involved in
regulating expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes may also function in transcriptionally inducing cytosolic sulfotranferases. For example, the vitamin D receptor
mediating nuclear signaling, known to induce cytochrome P450 expression also appears
to be involved along with the farnesoid X nuclear receptor in stimulating endogenous
SULT2A1 expression (Echchgadda et al., 2004; Song et al., 2001). Progress is being
made in understanding the regulation of this isofrom (e.g., Runge-Morris et al., 1999);
however there is little known concerning mechanisms regulating the expression of other
SULT isoforms.
Finally, progress in understanding interactions between the different components of
the sulfonation system in various organs and tissues is emerging. Recent work
employing mRNA expression and immunohistochemistry has localized steroid sulfatase
and various organic acid transport proteins in biopsy samples of human temporal lobe
(Steckelbroeck et al., 2004). It is tempting to speculate that these components function
together with de novo biosynthesis of DHEA-sulfonate and other 3-3-hydroxy steroids
to regulate levels of these steroids at critical sites in the brain.
REFERENCES
Adjei, A. A., Weinshilboum, R. M. (2002). Catecholestrogen sulfation; possible role in
carcinogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 292;402-408.
Adjei, A. A., Thomae, B. A., Prondzinski, J. L., Eckloff, B. W., Wieben, E. D.,
Weinshilboum, R. M. (2003). Human estrogen sulfotransferase (SULTIEI)
pharmacogenomics; gene resequencing and functional genomics. Br. J. Pharmacol.
139;1373-1382.
Aldred, S., Waring, R. H. (1999). Localisation of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphotransferase in adult rat brain. Brain Res. Bull. 48;291-296. [In Process Citation].
Axelson, M. (1985). 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 3-sulphate is a major circulating form of
vitamin D in man. FEBS Lett. 191; 171-175.
Bamber, D. E., Fryer, A. A., Strange, R. C , Elder, J. B., Deakin, M., Rajagopal, R.,
Fawole, A., Gilissen, R. A., Campbell, F. C , Coughtrie, M. W. (2001). Phenol
sulphotransferase SULT1A1*1 genotype is associated with reduced risk of
colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenetics ll;679-685.
Barker, E. V., Hume, R., Hallas, A., Coughtrie, M. W. H. (1994). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfotransferase in the developing human fetus; quantitative biochemical
and immunological characterization of the hepatic, renal, and adrenal enzymes.
Endocrinology 134;982-989.
Baulieu, E. E. (1998). Neurosteroids; a novel function of the brain. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23;963-987.
835
836
Kauffman
Duffel, M. W., Marshal, A. D., McPhie, P., Sharma, V., Jakoby, W. B. (2001). Enzymatic
aspects of the phenol (aryl) sulfotransferases. Drug Metab. Rev. 33;369-395.
Echchgadda, I., Song, C. S., Roy, A. K., Chatterjee, B. (2004). Dehydroepiandrosterone
sulfotransferase is a target for transcriptional induction by the vitamin D receptor.
Mol. Pharmacol. 65:720-729.
Eisenhofer, G., Coughtrie, M. W., Goldstein, D. S. (1999). Dopamine sulphate: an
enigma resolved. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. Suppl. 26:S41-S53.
Estensen, R. D., Jordan, M. M., Wiedmann, T. S., Galbraith, A. R., Steele, V. E.,
Wattenberg, L. W. (2004). Effect of chemopreventive agents on separate stages of
progression of benzo[{alpha}]pyrene induced lung tumors in A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 25:197-201.
Falany, C. N., Xie, X., Wang, J., Ferrer, J., Falany, J. L. (2000). Molecular cloning and
expression of novel sulphotransferase-like cDNAs from human and rat brain.
Biochem. J. 346(Pt. 3):857-864.
Flood, J. F., Farr, S. A., Johnson, D. A., Li, P. K., Morley, J. E. (1999). Peripheral steroid
sulfatase inhibition potentiates improvement of memory retention for hippocampally administered dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate but not pregnenolone
sulfate. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24:799-811.
Frye, C. A., Lacey, E. H. (1999). The neurosteroids DHEA and DHEAS may influence
cognitive performance by altering affective state. Physiol. Behav. 66:85-92.
Fuda, H., Lee, Y. C , Shimizu, C , Javitt, N. B., Strott, C. A. (2002). Mutational analysis
of human hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase SULT2B1 isoforms reveals that exon IB
of the SULT2B1 gene produces cholesterol sulfotransferase, whereas exon lA
yields pregnenolone sulfotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 277:36161-36166.
Glatt, H. (2000). Sulfotransferases in the bioactivation of xenobiotics. Chem.-Biol.
Irtteract. 129:141-170.
Glatt, H., Meinl, W. (2004). Use of genetically manipulated Salmonella typhimurium
strains to evaluate the role of sulfotransferases and acetyltransferases in nitrofen
mutagenicity. Carcinogenesis 25:779-786.
Glatt, H., Pauly, K., Czich, A., Falany, J. L., Falany, C. N. (1995). Activation of benzylic
alcohols to mutagens by rat and human sulfotransferases expressed in Escherichia
coli. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 293:173-181.
Glatt, H., Davis, W., Meinl, W., Hermersdorfer, H., Venitt, S., Phillips, D. H. (1998). Rat,
but not human, sulfotransferase activates a tamoxifen metabolite to produce DNA
adducts and gene mutations in bacteria and mammalian cells in culture.
Carcinogenesis 19:1709-1713.
Glatt, H., Engelke, C. E. H., Pabel, U., Teubner, W., Jones, A. L., Coughtrie, M. W. H.,
Andrae, U., Falany, C. N., Meinl, W. (2000). Sulfotransferases: genetics and role in
toxicology. Toxicol. Lett. 112-113:341-348.
Glatt, H., Boeing, H., Engelke, C. E. H., Ma, L., Kuhlow, A., Pabel, U., Pomplun, D.,
Teubner, W., Meinl, W. (2001). Human cytosolic sulphotransferases: genetics,
characteristics, toxicological aspects. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen.
482:27-40.
Haenen, G. R. M. M., Jansen, F. P., Vermeulen, N. P. E., Bast, A. (1991). Activation of
the microsomal glutathione S-transferase by metabolities of a-methyldopa. Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 287:48-52.
837
838
KaufTman
839
840
Kauffman
841
842
Kauffman
and estrone sulfate in enriched periportal and perivenous rat hepatocytes. Drug
Metab. Dispos. 29:335-346.
Taskinen, J., Ethell, B. T., Pihlavisto, P., Hood, A. M., Burchell, B., Coughtrie, M. W.
(2003). Conjugation of catechols by recombinant human sulfotransferases, UDPglucuronosyltransferases, and soluble catechol 0-methyltransferase: structureconjugation relationships and predictive models. Drug Metab. Dispos. 31:11871197.
Thomae, B. A., Eckloff, B., Ereimuth, R. R., Carlini, E., Wieben, E., Weinshilboum,
R. M. (2001). Human sulfotransferase (SULT) 2A1 pharmacogenetics: genotype
to phenotype studies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 69:94.
Thomae, B. A., Rifki, O. E., Theobald, M. A., Eckloff, B. W., Wieben, E. D.,
Weinshilboum, R. M. (2003). Human catecholamine sulfotransferase (SULT 1 A3)
pharmacogenetics: functional genetic polymorphism. J. Neurochem. 87:809-819.
Thomas, N. L., Coughtrie, M. W. (2003). Sulfation of apomorphine by human
sulfotransferases: evidence of a major role for the polymorphic phenol
sulfotransferase, SULTlAl. Xenobiotica 33:1139-1148.
Tiemersma, E. W., Bunschoten, A., Kok, E. J., Glatt, H., de Boer, S. Y., Kampman, E.
(2004). Effect of SULTlAl and NAT2 genetic polymorphism on the association between cigarette smoking and colorectal adenomas. Int. J. Cancer 108:97103.
Tolbert, B. M. (1985). Metabolism and function of ascorbic acid and its metabolites. Int.
J. Vitam. Nutr Res. Suppl. 27:121-138.
Visser, T. J. (1994). Role of sulfation in thyroid hormone metabolism. Chem.-Biol.
Interact. 92:293-303.
Visser, T. J., Kaptein, E., Glatt, H., Bartsch, L, Hagen, M., Coughtrie, M. W. (1998).
Characterization of thyroid hormone sulfotransferases. Chem.-Biol. Interact.
109:279-291.
Walle, T., Eaton, E. A., Walle, U. K. (1995). Quercetin, a potent and specific inhibitor of
the human P-form phenolsulfotransferase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 50:731-734.
Watabe, T., Ishizuka, T., Isobe, M., Ozawa, N. (1982). A 7-hydroxymethyl sulfate ester
as an active metabolite of 7,12- dimethylbenz[alpha]anthracene. Science 215:403405.
Weinshilboum, R., Aksoy, I. (1994). Sulfation pharmacogenetics in humans. Chem.-Biol.
Interact. 92:233-246.
Weinshilboum, R., Otterness, D. (1994). Sulfotransferase enzymes. In: Kauffman, E. C ,
ed. Conjugation-Deconjugation Reactions in Drug Metabolism and Toxicity.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 45-78.
Weinshilboum, R. M., Otterness, D. M., Aksoy, I. A., Wood, T. C , Her, C , Raftogianis,
B. B. (1997). Sulfotransferase molecular biology: cDNAs and genes. FASEB J.
11:3-14.
Whittemore, R. M., Roth, J. A. (1985). Effect of phosphatase inhibition of in vitro
dopamine sulfation and 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate catabolism in
human brain. Biochem. Pharmacol. 34:3853-3856.
Witzmann, E., Coughtrie, M., Eultz, C , Lipscomb, J. (1996). Effect of structurally
diverse peroxisome proliferators on rat hepatic sulfotransferase. Chem.-Biol. Int.
99:73-84.
Xu, Z. H., Otterness, D. M., Ereimuth, R. R., Carlini, E. J., Wood, T. C , Mitchell, S.,
843
Moon, E., Kim, U. J., Xu, J. P., Siciliano, M. J., Weinshilboum, R. M. (2000).
Human 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthetase 1 (PAPSSl) and
PAPSS2: gene cloning, characterization and chromosomal localization. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 268:437-444.
Xu, Z. H., Thomae, B. A., Eckloff, B. W., Wieben, E. D., Weinshilboum, R. M. (2003).
Pharmacogenetics of human 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthetase 1
(PAPSSl): gene resequencing, sequence variation, and functional genomics.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 65:1787-1796.
Yanai, H., Javitt, N. B., Higashi, Y., Euda, H., Strott, C. A. (2004). Expression of
cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2Blb) in human platelets. Circulation 109:9296.
Zheng, W., Xie, D., Cerhan, J. R., Sellers, T. A., Wen, W., Eolsom, A. R. (2001).
Sulfotransferase lAl polymorphism, endogenous estrogen exposure, well-done
meat intake, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 10:89-94.
Zhu, X., Veronese, M. E., Bernard, C. C , Sansom, L. N., McManus, M. E. (1993).
Identification of two human brain sulfotransferase cDNAs. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 195:120-127.
Zou, J., Pentney, R., Roth, J. A. (1990). Immunohistochemical detection of phenol
sulfotransferase-containing neurons in human brain. J. Neurochem. 55:1154-1158.