Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The film has no deep plot and does not try to be smart. It is straight to the point and effortlessly story driven. It plays out like a comic book to add fear and wonder. Actors all play these very stereotypical roles which relate to the time it was filmed: in cinemas hay day. This meant films didn't
have to be smart they just had to entertain, as if some one had gone to the theatre to watch a play or
pantomine. All the characters over do their stereotypes like the brave masculine sailor, the really
useless heroin , the gritty director who just wants his shot and the slightly racist asian chef. This sort
of character acting works though as they are all entertaining and do their roles fine. They help make
this a simple story to follow even King Kong is made simple-they did not feel the need to make
King Kong connect with the audience, you still feel bad for him event though they just keep him
simple. The heroin may get annoying with her shear uselessness but she just sticks to what a audi-
ence at that time would expect so she just spends most her time screaming and needing a man.
It often seems as though Ann Redman, who goes through more terror than any of the other
characters in the film, would faint, but she always appears to be able to scream. MORDAUNT HALL.. (1933).
this film is beautifully filmed, it uses beautiful sets which where made on big sound stages but are
done so well they actually make you feel like you are on location. there are occasional mistakes and
weird moments, like a couple of the boulders bounce weirdly but these can be ignored
because of the amount of detail there is in other aspects, like how the back drops use such beautiful
matte paintings and have a brilliant depth to them this sort of set building defined king KONG saw
much innovation in cinematography for example the use of rear projection,dummy miniatures
which where all adopted by modern film are all still used today and other camera effects altho king
kong makers never got recognised for this at the time because there was no award for special effects
or visual effect in 1933.
It is especially amazing seeing as that the studio RKO which produced the film was in a bad financially state at the time so the budget for king kong was kept down but due to some foresight and
foresight and planning and use of of resource the film makers where still able to produce a masterpiece.
http://film.thedigitalfix.com/content/id/59391/king-kong-1933-collectors-edition.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Kong_(1933_film)
http://fineartamerica.com/featured/6-king-kong-1933-granger.html
Bibliography
.Almar Haflidason. ( 2001). King Kong . Available:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/01/30/king_kong_1933_review.shtml.
Last accessed 21 October 2014.
MORDAUNT HALL.. (1933). King Kong (1933) A Fantastic Film in Which a
Monstrous Ape Uses Automobiles for Missiles and Climbs a Skyscraper..
Available:
http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9F03E3DC173BEF3ABC4B5
3DFB5668388629EDE. Last accessed 21 October 2014.
n/a. (n/a). King Kong . Available: http://www.filmsite.org/kingk.html.
Last accessed 21 October 2014.