Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstrak
-
Daftar Pustaka
1. Guler Cigdem, Evaluation of canal cleanliness and tubular penetration of root canal
sealers in primary second molars: a SEM study. -, Cumhuriyet Dent J , 2013.
2. Walton, Endodontics Principles And Practice. Missouri, Saunders, 2009.
3. Grossman, Ilmu Endodontik dalam Praktek. Jakarta, EGC, 1995.
Detail Article
Journal Media Conservative Dentistry Journal / Vol. 4. No. 1. 2014-01: 26 - 33
when in contact with periradicular tissue. Otherwise, mangosteen pericarp extract (Garcinia
mangostana L.) demonstrated various biological activities including antibacterial,
antiinflammatory, and antifungal. Considered to be apply as an irrigant for dental application.
Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility between mangosteen
pericarp extract and NaOCl to BHK-21 fibroblast cell. Method:Mangosteen pericarp extract
at the concentration 100ug/ml, 200ug/ml, 300ug/ml, and NaOCl 2,5% applied on BHK-21
fibroblast cell. Biocompatibility of the irrigants can be seen from the ability of cells to
proliferate after treatment and was calculated by the % cell viability formula. Cell which is
capable to proliferate will produce mitochondrial enzyme through the respiration process that
can be measured using the MTT assay method by ELISA reader. Result: At the concentration
of 100ug/ml, 200ug/ml and 300ug/ml showed good biocompatibility with fibroblast BHK-21
cell than NaOCl 2,5% through the ability of cells to proliferate. Conclusion: The mangosteen
pericarp extracts in every concentration has better biocompatibility than NaOCl 2,5% as
endodontic irrigants.
Keyword: Mangosteen pericarp extract (Garcinia mangostana L.), NaOCl 2, 5%, BHK-21,
Abstrak
-
Daftar Pustaka
1. Ingle, The Dicipline of Endodontics in Ingle Endodontics. Ontario, BC Dencker
Inc, 2008.
2. Haapasalo, Irrigant and Intracanal Medicaments in Ingle Endodontics. Ontario, BC
Dencker Inc, 2008.
3. Wintarsih, A comparative study of apical leakage on irrigation using and without
EDTA. -, Jurnal PDGI, 2009.
Detail Article
Journal Media Conservative Dentistry Journal / Vol. 4. No. 1. 2014-01: 34 - 39
1. Yora Wardati
2. Latief Mooduto
3. Edhie Arif Prasetyo
Abstract
Background: Cytotoxicity evaluation is an early stage to assess the biocompatibility of a
material or extract. Terms of root canal irrigant solution either one of them is a low
cytotoxicity against periapical tissues. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 3% is one of the irrigant
solution that commonly used in Indonesia but H2O2 is a free radicals. Propolis is a resinous
material producted by honey bees and has been used as an herbal medicine for a long time.
Propolis shown to have antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and many
other properties, and in previous studies suggest that propolis may eliminate the bacteria in
root canal effectively therefore can be used as root canal irrigant. Purpose: This study aimed
to compare the biocompatibility of 30% propolis extract and 3% H2O2 as a root canal
irrigant. Method: BHK-21 cell line were divided into 2 groups of treatment, namely the group
treated with the 30% propolis extract, and the group treated with 3% H2O2 for 2.5 minutes
each group, and measured using the MTT assay. Data were analyzed with one-way
ANNOVA with a significance level of 5% and Turkey HSD. Result: 30% propolis extract
group had a greater optical density than the group 3% H2O2 . Conclusion: 30% propolis
extract more biocompatible than H2O2 3% as root canal irrigant.
Keyword: biocompatibility, 3% H2O2, 30% propolis extract, BHK-21,
Abstrak
-
Daftar Pustaka
1. Wulandari, Cytotoxicity of 5% Tamarindus indica extract and 3% hydrogen peroxide
as root canal irigation. Surabaya, Majalah Kedokteran Gigi. (Dent. J.), 2008.
2. Tarigan, Rasinta, Perawatan Pulpa Gigi (Endodonti), Edisi 3. Jakarta, Buku
Kedokteran EGC, 2012.
3. Prasetyo, Rizky, Potensi Nanopropolis Lebah Madu Trigona spp Asal Pandeglang
sebagai Antibakteri. Bogor, Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2011.
Daftar Pustaka
Detail Article
Journal Media Conservative Dentistry Journal / Vol. 4. No. 1. 2014-01: 46 - 54
The purpose of this study was to know the differences between red betel leaf extract (Piper
crocatum) 25% and NaOCl 2.5% to remove the smear layer on the surface of root canal wall.
Methode: Three groups of teeth (7 teeth in each) were instrumented with protaper for hand
use files to F3 and irrigated as follows: Group 1: with red betel leaf extract (Piper crocatum)
25%; Group 2: with NaOCl 2.5%; Group 3 (control): with aquadest. Teeth were split
horizontally and longitudinally, the apical third of the root walls were observed by a scanning
electron microscope (SEM). Result: There were significant differences between each group
(P<0,05). Median value of group 1 with red betel leaf extract (Piper crocatum) shown 1, this
value (1) is the smallest value compared to the value of the other groups. Conclusion: Red
betel leaf extract (Piper crocatum) 25% better than NaOCl 2.5% to remove the smear layer on
the surface of root canal wall.
Keyword: Red betel leaf extract (Piper crocatum), NaOCl, smear layer,
Abstrak
-
Daftar Pustaka
1. Shahravan, A, Effect of Smear Layer on Sealing Ability of Canal Obturation : A
Systematic Review and Meta-amalysis. -, J Endod, 2007.
2. Torabinejad, M , Endodontics Principles and Practice, 4th . St. Louis, Saunders
Elsevier, 2009.
3. 13. Perard, Study of the RinsEndo action on the smear layer and debris removal by
scanning electron microscopy. -, Endo (Lond Engl) , 2013.