Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hsing-Yen Hsieh
Assistant professor, Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University
Huei-chu Cheng
Associate professor, Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University
3 8
3 2004 2009
:
8
5 10 ( 1,700-3,300 )
II
Abstract
In recent years the medical profession placed great hopes in the new techniques
of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation promising to replace
the traditional bone marrow transplant and give patients more opportunities for
remedy. Besides the private umbilical cord banks public match platforms are set up in
many countries to assist the medical demands of the population. This research focuses
on the system of umbilical cord blood donations in Taiwan, the public and private
modes of its operation and the analysis of the internal structures of these charity
collections. We looked at 3 non-profit cord blood donation agencies and 8 private
umbilical cord blood banks by collecting online-information concerning their mode of
operations. From 2004 until 2009 3 non-profit donor agencies in Taiwan included in
our study gradually stopped receiving donations for the following reasons: high
expenditure, less demand and a low matching success rate. The largest institution
stored more than 10,000 cord blood donations, and declared that this quantity met
their initial target. For the recipient a bag of 25cc concentrated umbilical cord blood
costs about 10,000 US dollars. The eight other private cord blood banks charge 1,700
to 3,300 US dollars from the donators to cover the storage costs. Private cord blood
banks are eager to encourage people to donate and store their cord blood. They
argue that more donations increase the matching success rate. Conclusion: Although
preserving cord blood is considered as a matter for public benefit, the priority of the
demand side tends to favor the affordable customer. A development towards an
imbalance between non-profit and private donor institutions has deepened the
inequalities between rich and poor when it comes to apply this new technique for
curing diseases.
Key Words: cord blood, public interest, new medical technology, health inequality
III
1999 (Science)
(Stem cell)
40-100CC
1988 Fanconis
2003
( 2000)
()
6 1000
200
( 2011)
3-4
1
( 2008) 8-10%
2000 2005 2009
3
2009
3 (
) ( 2011)
(
)
( 2007)
3 ()
20042008 2009 ( 2010)
3
( 2006
2012)
3
2
()
1998
1993
2002
2012 1 31
33 23,088
11,006 11 61 (
2011)
(
2012)
2000 2008 8
3
7-8 8-10%
2.6% 0.6% ( 2003 2004 2005
2008Rei 2010)
( 2011)2012 20%
50% (Wikipedia 2013) 2011
2002 2009 12
( 2011)
1988
Bone Marrow Donor Worldwide BMDW 2012
48 66 30 46
2,012 54
(Bone Marrow
Donors Worldwide, 2012; Gluckman 2009) BMDW
BMDW
BMDW
( 2013)
()
() 2004
2009 1998
2004 6 2012 2,142
452 2
20 30
( 2010 2012)
2008 11 2009 12
4,000 ( 2010)
11,000
15 8 9 (
2005)
100 (
2011) 30 ( 2010)
5-10 (
35,000 )
7 5
100
( 2012 2006)
()
(
)
()
10 1000
( 2009/01/25)
( 2011)
2004 3 (
) (BabyHome 2007/12/22)
6
36
(BabyHome 2007/12/21)
....
( BabyHome 2007/12/22) !
(BabyHome 2007/12/22) !
(BabyHome
2007/12/22)
(BabyHome 2006/07/22)
4000
( 2007)
5000 !
(BabyHome 2010/08/21)
( 2008)
(
2008)
6 4
( 2006)
( 2010)
( 2003)
() -
Titmuss(1971)
(Rei 2010)
(Technological progressivism)
(Rei 2010)
( 2006)
(
) ( 2009)
28
()
~~( 2011/08/18)
2010 10 5000
2008
(
) 2008 ( 2010)
()
5-10
(BabyHome
2009/03/30)
(Mobil01 2012/07/07)
(Mobil01 2012/07/03)
()
10
XX
( 2006/07/26)
()
( 2006 2006)
400 8 (
)
()
11
57% ( 2012)
( 2008)
(
2005)
12
( 2005
2008Rei 2010)
( 2006) 20
( 2005)
20 ( 2008)
( 2006)
( 2012)
( 2005 2008)
~~~
?
? ( 2011/08/18)
(Rei 2010)
13
14
(Rei,
2010)
5
(Lll 2012)
2007
1.
2.
3.4.
( 2011, 151)
( 2011 129)
1.
15
(
2006 , Rei, 2010)
2.
(
)
6,000 ( 2012)
18,000 ~25,000 ( BabyMother )
2005
2005
28~30
2 70-80
( 2005 2006)
3.
2005
(Merit
good)
1. (exclusion
16
principle)
2.
3.
17
2007
http://www.ccfroc.org.tw/child/child_affection_read.php?a_id=27
2012 8 8
2000 4(2)177-186
2006 6(3-4)129-135
2008
1561-88
2008 6 11
2011http://www.wretch.cc/blog/XC10192012
8 8
2012
http://www.blood.org.tw/Internet/main/docDetail.aspx?uid=6380&pid=6377&do
cid=299362012 8 8
2012
http://cisc.twbbs.org/doc/pdf/marrow.pdf2012 5 26
2011
http://www.healthbanks.com.tw/ch_05_share.asp?sn=554&page=1
2012 5 20
2006
12 19
2006 27(6)
https://sites.google.com/site/weijiaowenzhang/home/wei-jiao-wen-zhang/qidaixu
eyinxingdesiliyugongyi2012 8 20
2003
2005
2004 156-59
2009
BabyMother
http://www.ptt.cc/man/BabyMother/D189/D759/M.1282822762.A.ADB.html
2012 8 30
200330654-57
2003
http://www2.tzuchi.org.tw/case/marrow-443/html/08.htm 2012
8 8
2012
6 26
18
http://news.cts.com.tw/nownews/general/201206/201206281036024.html
2012 8 8
20101 30 10
13
2011
251-58
http://kfsyscc.org/index.php?menu_id=744 2012
8 22
2006
http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/question?qid=1106072209930
2012 8 30
2011
1998 5(11)22-24
2012http://viababy.org.tw/2012 5 15
2007 34(9)
685-692
2009 3040-41
2007
22(2)65-69
2007
http://mag.udn.com/mag/life/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=71290
5 30 31 2013 5 6
2012http://www.babybanks.com/welcome.asp
2012 7 30
2013http://www.babybanks.com/2009/bionet/adv4.html
2013 5 17
()2008
2011
426
2005
2422-25
2003
Nownews 8 21
2006
http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/6/3/13/n1252364.htm3 13
2013 5 8
201010 13
http://alveice.blogspot.com/2010_10_13_archive.html2012 7
30
19
2007
http://cisc.twbbs.org/lifetype/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=1205&blogI
d=12012 5 26
2010
7
5
2008 114126-137
2005
23092-98
2011
?
Mami Home
2011
3
http://www.babyhome.com.tw/info/c2.php?catid=1&subid=2&cid=4555
2012 8 30
2009
http://www2.tzuchi.org.tw/case/marrow-443/html/06.htm2012 5
26
2011
http://tw.tzuchi.org/btcscc/about/01.htm2012 5 26
2011
http://tw.tzuchi.org/btcscc/q_a/05.htm2013 5 8
2005
24
26-31
2000
2006 3 3
20054
21
2011
http://www.cordbloodguide.com.tw/01_content.asp?sn=432013
5 8
2006 20500 3 3
2004 2947-49
BabyHome ()
http://www.babyhome.com.tw/mboard.php?op=d&sID=1529277&bid=8
2012526
Blech, Jorg 2004
(Die Krankheitserfinder)
Blech Jorg 2006
(Heillose Medizin)
20