Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS MARUTI
UDOYOG
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Research Methodology
Chapter 4
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Chapter 5
Chapter-1
1.1Introduction
Financial analysis is the starting point for making plans, before using any sophisticated
forecasting and planning procedures. Understanding the past is a prerequisite for
anticipating the future. Financial analysis is the process of identifying the financial
strength and weakness of the firm by properly establishing relationship between the items
of the balance sheet and the profit and loss account. Financial analysis can be undertaken
by management of the firm, or by parties outside the firm, viz. owners, creditors,
investors and others. The nature of analysis will differ depending on the purpose of the
analyst.
Investors: Who invested their money in the firms shares, are most concerned about the
firms earnings. They more confidence in those firms that show steady growth in
earnings. As such, they concentrate on the analysis of the firms present and future
profitability. They are also interested in the firms financial structure to that extent
influence the firms earning ability and risk.
Trade creditors and financial institution: They are interested in firms ability to meet
their claims over a very short period of time. Their analysis will, therefore, confine to the
evolution of the firms liquidity position. And the financial institutions are interested in
the financial statements of the borrowing concern to ascertain its short-term as well as
long-term solvency and also it profitability.
Suppliers: On the other hand, are concerned with the firms long-term solvency and
survival. They analysis the firms profitability over time, its ability to generate cash to be
able to pay interest and repay principal and the relationship between various sources of
funds (capital structure relationships). Long-term creditors do analysis the historical
Financial statements, but they place more emphasis on the firms projected, or pro forma,
financial statements to make analysis about its future solvency and profitability.
Management and employees: The firm would be interested in every aspect of the
financial analysis. It is their overall responsibility to see that the resources of the firms are
used to most effectively and efficiently, and that the firms financial condition is sound.
The foresaid features of financial statement analysis that really facilitates the organization
to determine their financial strengths and weakness. In connection with this the
researcher has opted a maruti ltd to analyze their financial abilities and suggests them for
a long-term growth prospective. And the employees of a concern are interested in the
financial statement of the firms to ascertain its profitability and ability to offer higher
wages, bonus, better working conditions, etc.
Government: The Government is interested in the financial statements of a concern for
purposes of taxation, and also for the purpose of regulating the activities of the concern.
To judge the financial position of the concern and also analyze the strength and
weakness of the firm
To find out the solution to the unfavorable financial conditions and financial
performance
To involve comparison for a useful interpretation of the financial statement
.
Various objectives of the analysis are:
To study the service offered by the Maruti to the customers and financial
activities, and also study the new planes and schemes of the company.
Study is mainly focused on the financial and commercial activities of the
company.
To indicate the trend progress of downfall of the company.
To evaluate the profitability of the company.
To show the relative strength and weakness of the company.
To determine the financial condition and financial performance of the company.
To involve comparison for a useful interpretation of the financial statement
To find out the solution to the unfavorable financial conditions and financial
performance
To analyze how the company as utilized its each financial resources and its
sources
To find out the market share of the company
Chapter 2
PROFILE OF
COMPANY
2.1 PROFILE
Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL) was established in February 1981, though the actual
production commenced in 1983 with the Maruti 800, based on the Suzuki Alto kei car
which at the time was the only modern car available in India, its only competitors- the
Hindustan Ambassador and Premier Padmini were both around 25 years out of date at
that point. Through 2004, Maruti Suzuki has produced over 5 Million vehicles. Maruti
Suzukis are sold in India and various several other countries, depending upon export
orders. Models similar to Maruti Suzukis (but not manufactured by Maruti Udyog) are
sold by Suzuki Motor Corporation and manufactured in Pakistan and other South Asian
countries.The company exports more than 50,000 cars annually and has an extremely
large domestic market in India selling over 730,000 cars annually. Maruti 800, till 2004,
was the India's largest selling compact car ever since it was launched in 1983. More than
a million units of this car have been sold worldwide so far. Currently, Maruti Suzuki Alto
tops the sales charts.Due to the large number of Maruti 800s sold in the Indian market,
the term "Maruti" is commonly used to refer to this compact car model. Its manufacturing
facilities are located at two facilities Gurgaon and Manesar south of Delhi. Maruti
Suzukis Gurgaon facility has an installed capacity of 350,000 units per annum. The
Manesar facilities, launched in February 2007 comprise a vehicle assembly plant with a
capacity of 100,000 units per year and a Diesel Engine plant with an annual capacity of
100,000 engines and transmissions. Manesar and Gurgaon facilities have a combined
capability to produce over 700,000 units annually. More than half the cars sold in India
are Maruti Suzuki cars. The company is a subsidiary of Suzuki Motor Corporation, Japan,
which owns 54.2 per cent of Maruti Suzuki. The rest is owned by public and financial
institutions. It is listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange in
India. During 2007-08, Maruti Suzuki sold 764,842 cars, of which 53,024 were exported
in all over six million Maruti Suzuki cars are on Indian roads since the first car was rolled
out on 14 December 1983. Maruti Suzuki offers 14 models, Maruti 800, Alto, WagonR,
Estilo,, A-star, Ritz, Swift, Swift DZire, SX4, Omni, Eeco, Gypsy, Grand Vitara, Kizashi.
Swift, Swift DZire, A-star and SX4 are manufactured in Manesar, Grand Vitara and
Kizashi are imported from Japan as completely built units(CBU), remaining all models
are manufactured in Maruti Suzuki's Gurgaon Plant.[citation needed]Suzuki Motor Corporation,
the parent company, is a global leader in mini and compact cars for three decades.
Suzukis technical superiority lies in its ability to pack power and performance into a
compact, lightweight engine that is clean and fuel efficient. Nearly 75,000 people are
employed directly by Maruti Suzuki and its partners. It has been rated first in customer
satisfaction among all car makers in India from 1999 to 2009 by J D Power Asia
Type
Industry
Founded
Headquarters
Key people
Products
Revenue
Employees
Parent
Website
Public (BSEMARUTI,NSEMARUTI)
Automotive
1981(as Maruti Udyog Limited)
Delhi ,India
Mr. Shinzo Nakanishi,
Managing Director & CEO
Automobiles, Motorcycles
US $ 4.8 billion (2009)
6,903
Suzuki Motor Corporation
MarutiSuzuki.com
schools are modeled on international standards, where learners go through classroom and
practical sessions. Many international practices like road behavior and attitudes are also
taught in these schools. Before driving actual vehicles participants are trained on
simulators.
Company vision
10
The leading Indian automobile industry, creating customer delight and shareholders
wealth ; a pride of india. We must be an internationally competitive company in terms of
our products and services. We must retain our leadership in india and should also aspire
to be among the global players.
Company mission
To provide a wide range of modern and high quality fuel efficient vehicles in order to
meet needs of different customers, both in domestic and export markets. To provide
maximum value for money to their customers through continuous improvement of
product and services.Maruti has a network of 391 sales outlets across 230 cities all over
india.The service network covers 1,113 towns and cities, bolstered by2,142 authorised
services outlets. The companys change in strategy and emphasis on developing effective
marketing communications was their highlights
11
Ambassador
Fiat Palio
12
13
From
Year
2010
To
Year
2011
2009
2010
2008
2009
2007
2008
2006
2007
2005
2006
2004
2005
2003
2004
2002
2003
2001
2002
2000
2001
1999
2000
1993
1999
Class Of
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Equity
Share
Authorized
Capital
372.00
Issued
Capital
144.46
Paid Up Shares
(Nos)
288910060
Paid Up Face
Value
5
Paid Up
Capital
144.46
372.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
372.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
372.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
372.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
155.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
155.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
155.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
155.00
144.46
288910060
144.46
135.00
132.29
13229162
100
132.29
135.00
132.29
13229162
100
132.29
135.00
132.29
13229162
100
132.29
135.00
132.29
13229162
100
132.29
MANAGING
JOINT MANAGING
DIRECTOR
14
DIRECTOR
PART TIME
DIRECTOR
DVM
DEPARTMENT
MANAGER
MANAGER
DEPUTY
MANAGER
SENIOR
EXECUTIVE
SUPERVISOR
ASSISTANT SUPERVISOR
TRAINEE
The company has a multi-tier management structure, comprising the board of directors at
WORKER
the top followed by five business vertical
heads reporting to the Managing Director.
These business verticals are Marketing & Sales, Engineering, Production, Administration
and Supply Chain. Each of these verticals is headed by a team of two members, one of
whom is a Japanese manager and the other, an Indian manager. The Japanese managers
are also the Executive Directors of the board. The Indian managers are designated as
Managing Executive Officers (MEOs) and Executive Officers (EOs) and attend all board
meetings. They are supported by divisional and departmental heads. This system has
ensured regular flow of strategic direction from the board to the operational management,
effective implementation of the strategy, clear delegation of decision making with
accountability, timely risk identification and mitigation, adequate controls and reporting
of the company's operations, and a healthy financial performance.
15
Accounting to 79%, Cars rule the passenger automobile in India. The chief players in this
segment are Maruti Suzuki. While Maruti Suzuki enjoys full-fledged monopoly in multipurpose automobiles sector with 52% of market share
The automobile industry had a growth of 15.4 % during April-January 2007, with the
average annual growth of 10-15% over the last decade or so. With the incremental
investment of $35-40 billion, the growth is expected to double in the next 10 years.
Consistent growth and dedication have made the Indian automobile industry the secondlargest tractor and two-wheeler manufacturer in the world. It is also the fifth-largest
commercial vehicle manufacturer in the world. The Indian automobile market is among
the largest in Asia.
16
The key players like Hindustan Motors, Maruti Udyog, Fiat India Private Ltd, Tata
Motors, Bajaj Motors, Hero Motors, Ashok Leyland, Mahindra & Mahindra have been
dominating the vehicle industry. A few of the foreign players like Toyota Kirloskar Motor
Ltd., Skoda India Private Ltd., Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. have also entered the market
and have catered to the customers needs to a large extent.
Not only the Indian companies but also the international car manufacturing companies
are focusing on compact cars to be delivered in the Indian market at a much smaller
price. Moreover, the automobile companies are coming up with financial schemes such as
easy EMI repayment systems to boost sales.
There have been exhibitions like Auto-expo at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi to share the
technological advancements. Besides, there are many new projects coming up in the
automobile industry leading to the growth of the sector.
The Government of India has liberalized the foreign exchange and equity regulations and
has also reduced the tariff on imports, contributing significantly to the growth of the
sector. Having firmly established its presence in the domestic markets, the Indian
automobile sector is now penetrating the international arena. Vehicle exports from India
are at their highest levels. The leaders of the Indian automobile sector, such as Tata
Motors, Maruti and Mahindra and Mahindra are leading the exports to Europe, Middle
East and African and Asian markets.
The Ministry of Heavy Industries has released the Automotive Plan 2006-2016, with the
motive of making India the most popular manufacturing hub for automobiles and its
components in Asia. The plan focuses on the removal of all the bottlenecks that are
inhibiting its growth in the domestic as well as international arena
Structure : Maruti Suzuki India ltd. is Public Limited company and listed in Bombay
stock exchange and National Stock Exchange. Suzuki Motor Company(SMC) is Majority
shareholder 54.21% equity stake in a company. Share holding pattern of company:DEC2010
Promoter and Promoter
Group
Indian
SEP2010
JUN2010
MAR2010
DEC2009
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
--
--
--
--
--
17
Foreign
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
54.21 %
45.79 %
45.79 %
45.79 %
45.79 %
45.79 %
38.00 %
37.11 %
37.11 %
37.79 %
39.14 %
FII
21.00 %
20.09 %
20.09 %
21.12 %
22.82 %
DII
17.00 %
17.02 %
17.02 %
16.67 %
16.32 %
7.79 %
8.68 %
8.68 %
8.00 %
6.65 %
5.26 %
6.00 %
6.00 %
5.64 %
4.59 %
--
--
--
--
--
Public
Institutions
Non Institutions
Bodies Corporate
Custodians
Total
Chapter 3
18
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
19
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodology is considered as the nerve of the project. Without a proper wellorganized research plan, it is impossible to complete the project and reach to any
conclusion. The project was based on the survey plan. The main objective of survey was
to collect appropriate data, which work as a base for drawing conclusion and getting
result.
Therefore, research methodology is the way to systematically solve the research
problem. Research methodology not only talks of the methods but also logic behind the
methods used in the context of a research study and it explains why a particular method
has been used in the preference of the other methods
RESEARCH DESIGN
A Research Design is the framework or plan for a study which is used as a guide in
collecting and analyzing the data collected. It is the blue print that is followed in
completing the study. The basic objective of research cannot be attained without a proper
research design. It specifies the methods and procedures for acquiring the information
needed to conduct the research effectively. It is the overall operational pattern of the
project that stipulates what information needs to be collected, from which sources and by
what methods.
TYPE OF DATA COLLECTED
There are two types of data used. They are primary and secondary data. Primary data is
defined as data that is collected from original sources for a specific purpose. Secondary
data is data collected from indirect sources. (Source: Research Methodology, By C. R.
Kothari)
PRIMARY SOURCES
These include the survey or questionnaire method, telephonic interview as well as the
personal interview methods of data collection.
SECONDARY SOURCES
20
These include books, the internet, company brochures, product brochures, the company
website, competitors websites etc, newspaper articles etc.
However most of study is conducted was based on secondary sources.
21
Chapter 4
FIANCIAL ANALYSIS
OF
MARUTI LTD.
22
Financial Analysis
Financial statement namely the statement of the profit & loss account and the balance
sheet are indication of two signify-cant factors profitability and financial soundness
analysis of statements means such a treatment of the information contained to afford a
diagnosis of the profitability and financial statements analysis as the process of
methodical classification comparison with other co-rising question and then seeking
answer for them.
Finance is the very typical aspect in course of management. The main objective behind
the study is to get precisely. It also helps us to study the present finance scenario. The
objective is such that companys profitability, liquidity and capacity by such analysis we
can interpret the position of the company. So it is very important to study.
2009
2004
2003
2433.3
3130.8
2588.8
2055.8
1797.7
1308.1
656.9
2382.3
3071.2
2551.2
2035.4
1761.7
1264.7
604.2
1675.8
2503
2279.8
1750
1304.9
769.8
282.1
1072.63
1669.71
1535.29
1197.07
860.1
621.82
129.72
23
Useful information about the trend of profitability is from profitability ratio. The gross
profit ratio, net profit ratio and ratio of return on investment give a good idea of the
profitability of the business. On the basic of this ratio, investors get an idea about overall
efficiency of managers and bank as well as other creditors draw useful conclusion about
repaying capacity of the borrowers.
LIQUIDITY :
In fact the use of ratio was made initially to ascertain the Liquidity of business. The
current ratio, acid test ratio will tell whether the firm will be able to meet its current
liabilities and when they nature. Banks and other leaders will be able to conclude from
these ratios whether the firm will be able to pay regularly the interest and loan
installments.
EFFCIENCY :
The turnover ratios are excellent guide to measure the efficiency of managers. All such
ratio related to sales present a good picture of the success on the business.
INTER FIRM COMPARION :
The absolute ratios of a firm are not of much use, unless they are compared with similar
ratios of other firms belonging to the same industry. This is a inter firm compared to
other firms comparison, which shows the strength and weakness of the firm as
compared to other firms and will indicate corrective measures.
INDICATE TREND :
The ratio of the last 3 to 5 years will indicate the trend in the respective fields. A
particular ratio of a company, for one year may compare favorably with industry average,
but its trend shows a deteriorating position, it is not desirable only ratio analysis will
provide this information.
USEFUL FOR BUDGETARY CONTROL :
Regular budgetary reports are prepared in a business where the system of budgetary
control is in use. If various ratios are presented these reports, it will give a fairly good
idea about various aspects of financial position.
25
26
Classification of ratio
Profitability ratio
Implementation:
Gross profit is result of the relation between price, sales volume and costs. A
change in the gross margin can be brought about by changes in any of these
factors.
The gross profit ratio can also be used in determining the extent of loss caused by
theft, spoilage, damage and so on in the case of those firms which follow the
policy of fixed gross profit margin in pricing their product.
The gross margin represents the limit beyond which fall in sales price are outside
the tolerance limit.
27
Formula:
Gross profit
X 100
Sales
Particulars
Gross Profit (EBDT)
(In x10M Rs)
Net Sales (In x10M
Rs)
Gross Profit Ratio
2009
2005
2004
2003
1264.7
604.2
2382.3
3071.2
2551.2
1761.7
20530.1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
10923.8
9104.4
7180.1
11.603937
17.165597
17.359471
16.939222
16.1271
719
13.891
0856
8.41492
458
Interpretation
As mentioned above the gross profit ratio indicates the relationship between gross profit
and net sales. Here from the table we can judge the financial position of Maruti Suzuki
year wise.
Here 6 consecutive years from 2004 to 2009 are taken into consideration. The changes in
the gross profit ratio in percent are as follows.
Here, negative sign indicates that the percent is decreased compare to immediate previous
year, while positive sign indicates that the percent is decreased in the gross profit
compare to immediate previous year.
For consecutive four years the gross profit ratio is positive. It indicates better financial
position of the company.
28
Net profit ratio is valuable for the purpose of ascertaining the over-all profitability of
business and shows the efficiency of operating the business.
Implementation:
The net profit ratio is indicative of managements ability to operate the business
with sufficient success not only to recover from revenue of the period the cost of
merchandise or services, the expenses of operating the business and the cost of the
borrowed funds, but also to leave a margin of reasonable compensation to the
owners for providing their capital at risk.
The ratio of net profit ratio to sales essentially expresses the cost price
effectiveness of the operation.
A high net profit margin would ensure adequate return to the owners as well as
enable a firm to withstand adverse economic conditions when selling price is
declaiming, cost of production raising and a low net profit margin has the
opposite implication.
It indicates the portion of sales revenue is left to the proprietors after all operating
expenses are paid.
The higher the ratio, the better will be the profitability. In order to have a better
idea of profitability, the gross profit ratio and net profit ratio may be
simultaneously considered. If the gross profitability increases over the five years
but net profit is declining, it indicates that administrative expenses are slowly
rising.
Formula
Net Profit
Sales
X 100
29
Particulars
Net Profit (In x10M
Rs)
Net Sales (In x10M Rs)
Net Profit Ratio
2005
2004
2003
1072.63
1669.71
1535.29
1197.07
860.1
621.82
129.72
20530.1
5.224670
1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
9.3323682
10.446779
9.9623831
10923.8
7.87363
372
9104.4
6.8298
8445
7180.1
1.80666
007
2009
Interpretation:
Here 6 consecutive years from 2004 to 2009 are taken into consideration. The
changes in the net profit ratio in percent are as follows.
Higher the net profit ratio shows better financial position of the company.
Due to various reasons this ratio goes down. If the administration department is
not sufficient then net profit ratio goes down or the control mechanism is not
efficient at all check points then also it affects net profit of the company.
Net profit is the profit that is available to the proprietors of the firm after clearing
all outstanding and expenses. Thus, higher the ratio yields higher profit.
30
Expenses Ratio:
Meaning:
Implementation:
Formula:
Expenses X 100
Sales
Particulars
Total Expenditure
(In x10M Rs)
Net Sales (In x10M
Rs)
Net Profit Ratio
2009
2005
2004
2003
18738.7
15934.2
12462.8
10625.3
9671
8177.1
6704.8
20530.1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
10923.8
9104.4
7180.1
91.274275
89.059670
84.802297
88.427000
88.5314
634
89.814
8148
93.3803
15
Interpretation:
Above table shows that for the year 2004 05 it was 88.64 % the increase in 2005
06 up to 89.23% that indicates there is increase in operating expenses for the
year 2006 07 it is 92.03% and it is higher than previous year which shows
increase in operating expenses.
This operating expense may be due to growth in the organization or it may reflect
inefficacy of administrative control on expenses.
Here negative sign shows decrease in operating expenses.
Operating Ratio:
Meaning:
Operating Ratio is computed by dividing expenses by sales.
The term operating ratio includes (1) COGS (2) administrative expenses (3)
selling expenses and (4) financial expenses but excludes taxes, dividends and
extraordinary losses due to theft of goods, good destroyed by fire and so on.
Implementation:
Formula:
C O G S + Operating expenses
X 100
Net sales
Particulars
Operating
Expense
2009
OPERATION RATIO
2008
2007
2006
2114.8
1510.4
1244.21
900.15
COGS
3498.6
3744.5
3197.01
2506.35
Net Sales
20530.1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
Operating Ratio
27.3423
29.3708
30.22
28.3499
2005
2004
2003
801.54
786.54
840.88
2160.0
4
10923.
8
1673.6
4
1168.58
9104.4
7180.1
27.021
9
27.9865
27.1113
32
INTERPRETATION:
Formula:
EBIT
Capital employed
Particulars
X 100
2004
2003
33
2382.3
3071.2
2551.2
2035.4
1761.7
1264.7
604.2
9344.9
8415.4
6853.9
5452.6
4378.8
3591.2
3098
25.4930497
36.49499
73
37.222
6032
37.3289
807
40.232
4838
35.216
6407
19.502
9051
Interpretation :
It is carries the relationship of return to the sources of funds yet another step
further.
In order to judge the efficiency with which the proprietors funds are employed in
business, this ratio is ascertained. Proprietors equity or Proprietors funds include
share capital and reserves.
It is of great practical importance to the perspective of investors, as it enables the
profitability of a company to be compared with that of other.
It also indicates whether the return on proprietors fund is enough in relation to
the risk that they undertake.
This ratio shows what amount of dividend is likely to be received on shares.
Implementation:
Formula:
Net profit
X 100
Share holders fund
34
Particulars
Net Profit (In x10M Rs)
Capital Employed ( Share
capital + Reserves and
surplus) (In x10M Rs)
Return on Investment
2004
621.82
2003
129.72
9344.9
8415.4
6853.9
5452.6
4378.8
3591.2
3098
11.4782
395
19.84112
46
22.4002
393
21.9541
136
19.642
3678
17.315
1036
4.18721
756
Interpretation:
The ratio indicates relationship between Net profits to share holders fund
therefore higher the returns to shareholders.
For the year 2004 05 it is 21.90 % that increase in the year 2005 06 up to 23.70.
This ratio shows downward trend in the ratio in return on shareholders fund for
this company.
During the year 2008-09 there is 72.97% decrease in the ROI. This ratio shows
upward trend for that financial year for the company.
Implementation:
This is probably the single most important ratio to judge whether the firm has
Formula:
Net profit after tax Preference dividend
X 100
Equity capital
Particulars
2004
2003
35
1072.63
1669.71
1535.29
1197.07
860.1
621.82
129.72
144.5
144.5
144.5
144.5
144.5
144.5
144.5
55.73
8.13
22.03
28.14
27.73
79.12
11.46
Interpretation:
The ratio indicates relationship between Net profits to share holders fund
therefore higher the returns to shareholders.
For the year 2004 05 it is 19.49 % that increase in the year 2005 06 up to
21.81 %.
This ratio shows downward trend in the ratio in return on shareholders fund for
this company.
For the financial year 2008-09 there is 85% increase in the ratio in return on
shareholders fund. Here, year 2008-09 shows marked improvement that is
why it is taken into consideration.
Implementation:
This is probably the single most important ratio to judge whether the firm has
Formula:
Net profit after tax Preference dividend
X 100
36
2004
621.82
2003
129.72
3591.2
3098
0
17.315
1036
0
4.18721
756
INTERPRETATION:
For the year 2004 05 it is 19.64 % that increase in the year 2005 06 up to
21.95%.
These ratios shows downward trend in the ratio in return on shareholders fund for
this company.
Here in the year 2008-09 there is decrease of 69% compared to previous year in
the ROI which shows upward trend in the company.
EPS measures the profit available to the equity shareholders on a per share basis,
that is, the amount that they can get on every share head.
This ratio shows the profitability of the firm from the owners point of view. By
comparing EPS of the current year with past years the path of the trend of
profitability can be ascertained.
It is essential that EPS of the company should be compared with the other
companies and also average of the company before giving final opinion.
The limitation of EPS is that it does not show how much dividend is actually paid
to shareholders and how much profit is retained in business.
Implementation:
2004
621.82
288910
060
0
21.522
9612
2003
129.72
2889100
60
0
44.8997
865
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the earning per share for shareholders of company.
In the year 2004 05 ratio is 29.77 % and 2005 06 it is 41.43 % and its increase on
2006-07 is 53.14 %.therefore it is good for company as well as shareholders.
Implementation:
The DPS would be a better indicator than EPS as the former shows what exactly
Formula:
Total dividend declared
No. of equity shares
38
Particulars
No. of Equity Shares
2005
2889100
60
2004
288910
060
2003
2889100
60
101.1
144.5
130
101.1
57.8
43.3
42.7
3.49935
894
5.00155
654
4.49967
024
3.49935
894
2.00062
262
1.4987
3632
1.47796
861
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the total dividend declared to no. of shares. For the year 2004
It is closely related to the earning yield leanings price ratio. It is actually the
reciprocal of the latter. Thus ratio is computed by dividing the market price of the
shares by the EPS.
Implementation:
The price earning ratio reflects the price currently being paid by the market for
each Rupee of currently reported EPS. In other words, the PIE ratio measures
investors expectations and the market appraisal of the earnings. Therefore, only
normally sustainable earning associated with the assets are taken into account.
Formula:
Market value per share
Earning per share
39
Particulars
Market Value of Share (In
Rs)
Earning Per Share (In Rs)
Price Earning Ration
2005
2004
2003
1559.65
520.1
990.05
927.35
636.5
461.25
376.3
41.57
37.5186
433
59.03
8.81077
418
53.29
18.5785
326
40.65
22.8130
381
29.25
21.7606
838
18.56
24.851
8319
4.88
77.1106
557
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the earning per share for shareholders of company.
In the year 2004 05 ratio is 17.58% and 2005 06 it is 21.95% and its increase
on 29.55%.
Therefore it is good for company as well as shareholders.
Implementation:
The dividend yield ratio is calculated by dividing the cash dividends per share by
the market value per share.
Formula:
Dividend per share
Market value share
40
Particulars
Market Value of Share (In Rs)
Dividend Per Share (In Rs)
Dividend Yield Ratio
2005
2004
2003
1559.65
520.1
990.05
927.35
636.5
461.25
376.3
3.4993589
4
0.0022436
8
5.001555
65
0.009616
53
4.49967
024
0.00454
489
3.499358
94
0.003773
5
2.00062
262
0.00314
316
1.4987
3632
0.0032
4929
1.4779
6861
0.0039
2763
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the earning per share for shareholders of company.
In the year 2004 05 ratio is 17.58% and 2005 06 it is 21.95%.
For the year 2007-08 the ratio is decreased by 109.9% and for 2008-09 it is
increased by 76.51%. So for current situation is good for company as well as
shareholders.
Implementation:
This ratio uses the concept of net profits before taxes because tax is calculated
41
Formula:
EBITD
Interest
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2433.
3
3130.8
2588.8
2055.8
1797.7
1308.1
656.9
51
59.6
37.6
20.4
36
43.4
52.7
47.71
1764
7
52.53020
13
68.85106
38
100.774
51
49.9361
111
30.1405
53
12.464
8956
INTERPRETATION:
This ratio indicates the EBDIT to interest. In the year 2004 05 ratio is 49.93 and
2005 06 it is 100.8 and its decrease on 68.85.therefore it is good for company as
well as shareholders.
For the year 2008-09 the interest covering ratio is 47.71 while for the year 200708 it is 52.53.It is decreasing for the last 2 financial years due to the fluctuation in
for-ex.
42
Meaning:
The amount invested in business is invested in all capital employed and sales are
affected through them to earn profits so in order to find relation between net sales
to capital employed.
Implementation:
The usefulness of the Du Pont analysis lies in the fact that it presents the overall
picture of the performance of a firm as also enables the management to identify
the factors which have a bearing on profitability.
Formula:
Net sales
Capital employed
Particulars
Net Sales (In x10M Rs)
Capital Employed
( Share capital +
Reserves and surplus)
(In x10M Rs)
OVERALL TURNOVER
RATIO
2005
10923.8
2004
9104.4
2003
7180.1
9344.9
8415.4
6853.9
5452.6
4378.8
3591.2
3098
2.19693
0946
2.126054
614
2.144224
456
2.203700
987
2.49470
174
2.5351
97149
2.31765
6553
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates net sales to capital employed. In the year 2004 05 ratio is
2.49 and 2005 06 it is 2.20 and its decrease on 2.14 in the year 2006 07.
Therefore it is bad for company.
In the year 2008-09 the ratio is 2.19 while in the year 2007-08 the ratio is
decreased to 2.12 which shows slow down in the company.
43
Meaning:
It is based on the relationship between the sales and assets of the firm.
A reference to this was made while working out the overall profitability of a form
as reflected in its earning power.
Implementation:
To ascertain efficiency and profitability of the business. The higher the turnover
ratio, the more efficiency is the management and utilization of the assets while
low turnover ratios are indicative of underutilization of available resources.
Formula:
Particulars
Net Sales (In x10M
Rs)
Total Fixed Asset (In
x10M Rs)
Fixed Asset Turnover
Ratio
Sales
Fixed assets
FOR FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
20530.1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
10923.8
9104.4
7180.1
7079.34
4828
5716.166
134
4740.7419
35
4073.186
441
3943.61
011
3554.50
495
2.9
3.13
3.1
2.95
2.77
3746.6
6667
2.4299
99998
2.02
Interpretation:
Fixed turn over ratio indicates the turnover of the company in one year.
In the year 2004 05 ratio is 2.77 and 2005 06 it is 2.95 and it increase on 3.1
44
It is allied and closely related to this is the average collection period. It is the test
of the liquidity of the debtors of a firm.
Implementation:
This figure should be measured, as in the case of average inventory, on the basis
of the monthly average. It suggests that number of times the amount of credit sale
is collected during the year.
Formula:
Credit sales
Avg. Debtors
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
20530.1
17891.6
14696.3
12015.9
10923.8
9104.4
7180.1
697.117
1477
596.9836
503
595.23288
78
507.2140
144
527.974
867
560.61
57635
603.877
2077
29.45
29.97
24.69
23.69
20.69
16.24
11.89
Interpretation:
24.69 in the year 2006 07. Therefore, it is good position for company.
In the year 2008-09 there is 1% decrease in the Debtors turnover ratio compare
to previous year and 2007-08 there is 17.91% increase in the debtors turn over
ratio.
How efficiently the amount is collected from the customers from the credit sales.
As compare to previous year the no. of days collection period increase which
indicate inefficiency of collection department.
45
Lower the collection period and higher debtor turnover ratio is advisable.
Creditor ratio:
Meaning:
It is the no. of days within which we make payment to our creditors for credit
purchases it obtained from creditor ratio.
Implementation:
The generally the longer credit period achieved means the operation of the
payment being financial interest feels by supper funds.
Formula:
Creditor + B / P
Credit Purchases
Particulars
Creditor (In x10M
Rs)
Bills Payable (In
x10M Rs)
Credit Purchase
(In x10M Rs)
Creditor Ratio
X 365
2006
2005
854.9
909.6
555.1
463.7
13938.8
10836.4
9392.8
8621.3
22.38632
45
30.637850
21
21.570937
31
19.631668
1
Interpretation:
Creditor ratio indicates creditor to credit purchase.
In the year 2004 05 ratio is 19.63 and 2005 06 it is 21.57 and its increase on 30.63 in
the year 2006 07.
In the year 2007-08 there is decrease on 22.38 times i.e. decrease of 36.36% in the
creditor ratio compare to previous year.
Thus it indicates slight slow down in the financial condition of the company.
46
It is the no. of days within which we make payment to our creditors for credit
purchases it obtained from creditor ratio.
Implementation:
The generally the longer credit period achieved means the operation of the
payment being financial interest feels by supper funds.
Formula:
No. of days in a year
Creditors ratio
Particulars
NO. Of
Days in
Year
Creditor's
Ratio
Creditors
Turnover
Ratio
2005
365
365
365
22.3863245
30.6378502
1
21.57093731
19.6316681
16.30459703
11.9133685
1
16.92091515
18.5924089
Interpretation:
Creditor ratio indicates creditor to credit purchase. In the year 2004 05 ratio is
18.59 and 2005 06 it is 16.92 and its increase on 11.91 in the year 2006 07.
Therefore, it is good position for company.
During the year 2007-08 ratio is 16.30. It increases in compare to previous
financial year thus it indicates good position of the company.
47
It is the no. of times the average stock is turned over during the year is known as
stock turnover ratio. It measures the relationship between COGS and inventory
level.
Higher the turnover ratio, the more profitable business would be. Such firms will
be able to trade on a smaller margin of a gross profit.
Lower stock turn over ratio indicates accumulation of slow moving, obsolete and
low quality goods, which is a danger signal for management.
Implementation:
This approach has the advantage of being free from bias as it smoothens out the
Formula:
Cost of good sold
Average stock
Particulars
Sales Turnover (In
x10M Rs)
Gross Profit (EBDT)
(In x10M Rs)
Cost Of Good Sold
(COGS) (In x10M Rs)
Inventories (In x10M
Rs)
Stock Turn over Ratio
2009
2005
2004
2003
23182.2
21025.2
17205.9
14753.1
13335.7
11047.4
8981.5
2382.3
3071.2
2551.2
2035.4
1761.7
1264.7
604.2
20799.9
17954
14654.7
12717.7
11574
9782.7
8377.3
902.3
1038
701.4
881.2
666.6
439.8
487
23.052089
11
17.29672
447
20.893498
72
14.4322514
8
17.362736
3
22.243519
78
17.2018480
5
Interpretation:
48
For the year 2008-09 and 2007-08 the ratio are 23.05 times and 17.3 times
Liquidity Ratio:
Current Ratio:
Meaning:
The current ratio is the ratio of total current assets to total current liability. It is
calculated by dividing current assets by current liability.
It is also known as a working capital ratio, as it is measure of working capital
available at a particular time. It is a measure of short term financial strength of the
business and shows whether the business will be able to meet its current
liabilities, as and when they mature.
Implementation:
The current ratio of a firm measures its short term solvency. That is a measure of
margin of safety to the creditors. The fact that a firm can rarely count on such an
even flow requires that the size of the C.A. should be sufficiently larger than C.L.
so that the firm would be assured of being able to pay its current maturing debts
as and when it becomes due.
Formula:
Current Assets
Current liability
Particulars
Total Current
Assets (In
x10M Rs)
Total Current
Liabilities (In
2009
2005
2004
2003
5491.1
3097.9
4405
3740.9
2972
2018.9
2782.8
3397.6
2825.7
3072.4
1977.1
1608
1531.8
1478.6
49
x10M Rs)
Current Ratio
1.6162
1.096330
1.433732
1.892114
1.848258
1.31799
1.882050
Interpretation:
Current ratio indicates current assets to current liability. In the year 2004 05
ratio is 1.84: 1 and 2005 06 it is 1.89: 1 and its decrease on 1.43: 1 in the year
2006 07.
Therefore, it is good for company.
For the year 2008-09 the ratio is 1.61:1 and for the year 2007-08 it is 1.61:1. So
for the year 2008-09 it is good as ideal is 2:1 and 1.61:1 closer to ideal one.
Mainly 2: 1 is good. It indicates, repaying condition of the company to the current
liabilities. The standard current ratio must be 2:1.
Liquid Ratio:
Meaning:
Implementation:
The importance of adequate liquidity in the sense of the ability of a firm to meet
short term obligations when they become due for payment can hardly be
overstressed.
In fact liquidity is a prerequisite for the very survival of a firm. It measures ability
of a firm to meet its short term obligations and reflect the short term finance
strength of a firm.
Formula:
Liquid assets
Liquid liability
50
Particulars
Total
Current
Assets (In
x10M Rs)
Inventories
(In x10M
Rs)
Prepaid
Expenses
(In x10M
Rs)
Quick Asset
(In x10M
Rs)
Total
Current
Liabilities
(In x10M
Rs)
Bank Over
Draff (In
x10M Rs)
Liquidity
Ratio
2009
2005
2004
2003
5491.1
3097.9
4405
3740.9
2972
2018.9
2782.8
902.3
1038
701.4
881.2
666.6
439.8
487
4588.8
2059.9
3703.6
2859.7
2305.4
1579.1
2295.8
3397.6
2825.7
3072.4
1977.1
1608
1531.8
1478.6
1.350600
42
0.728987
51
1.2054
42
1.446411
41
1.433706
47
1.03087
87
1.552684
97
Interpretation:
Liquid ratio indicates liquid assets to liquid liability. In the year 2004 05 ratio is 1.43: 1
and 2005 06 it is 1.44: 1 and its decrease on 1.21: 1 in the year 2006 07. Therefore, it
is good for company. How effectively the liability paid off.
For the year 2008-09 the ratio is 1.35:1 which shows slight better condition compare to
FY 2004-05.
The standard liquidation must be 1:1.
The measure of absolute liquidity may be obtain by comparing only cash and
bank balance as well as readily marketable securities with liquid liabilities.
This is exacting standard of liquidity and it is satisfactory if the ratio is 0.5:1.
51
Quick assets here do not include both stock and debtors, because payment from
debtors would not generally be received immediately when liquid liabilities are to
be paid.
Implementation:
This ratio is the most rigorous and conservative test of a firms liquidity position.
Further, it is suggested that it would be useful for the management.
Formula:
Quick assets
Liquid liability
Particulars
Quick Assets
(In x10M Rs)
Current
Liability (In
x10M Rs)
Quick Acid
Test Ratio
2009
2004
2003
5491.1
3097.9
4405
3740.9
2972
2018.9
2782.8
3397.6
2825.7
3072.4
1977.1
1608
1531.8
1478.6
1.616170
24
1.096330
11
1.433732
59
1.892114
71
1.848258
71
1.31799
19
1.882050
59
Interpretation:
Quick acid test ratio is indicates quick assets and liquid liability. In the year 2004
05 ratio is 1.84: 1 and 2005 06 it is 1.89: 1 and its decrease on 1.4: 1 in the
year 2006 07. Therefore, it is good for company.
Leverage Ratio:
Proprietary ratio:
Meaning:
The ratio shows the proportion of proprietors funds to the total assets employed in
known in the proprietary ratio.
Implementation:
52
Proprietary ratio helps to known how many proprietary funds to total assets.
The higher the ratio, the stronger the financial position of the enterprise, as it
signifies that the proprietors have provided larger funds to purchase assets. This
ratio can not exceed 100%; it means that the business does not use any outside
funds. There are no outside liabilities. Purchases are made for cash only and firm
carries business entirely from own funs only. A very high ratio therefore is not
desired as it shows insufficient use of out side fund is made.
Generally it is said that proprietors fund should be enough to cover fixed assets.
And also reasonable proportion must be maintained between owned funds and
borrowed funds, so the benefit of trading on equity is obtained. Which inture
increase the rate of equity dividend.
Formula:
Proprietary fund
Net asset
Particulars
Total Proprietary
Funds (In x10M Rs)
Total Assets (In x10M
Rs)
Proprietary Ratio
2009
2005
2004
2003
9344.9
8415.4
6853.9
5452.6
4378.8
3591.2
3098
10043.8
9315.6
7484.7
5524.3
4686.4
3903.1
3554
93.041478
32
90.3366
3962
91.57214
05
98.702098
93.43632
639
92.0089
1599
87.1693
8661
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the proprietary funds to total assets. For the year 2006 07 it is 91.57
% and 2007 08 is 90.33 % and increase in 2008 09 it is 93.04 %. This is a good for
company.
53
Implementation:
This ratio reflects the relative claims of creditors and shareholders against the
assets of the firm. Alternatively this ratio indicates the relative proportions of
debts and equity in financing the assets of a firm.
The D/E ratio is an important tool of financial analysis to appraise the financial
structure of a firm. It has important implication from view point of the creditors,
owners and the firm itself.
A higher ratio means that outside creditors have a larger claim than the owners of
business. The pressure from creditors would increase and their interference will
also increase. The company with high debt position will have to accept strict
conditions from the lenders, while borrowing money.
A lower ratio is not profitable from the view point of equity share holders, as
benefit of trading on equity is not availed of and the rate of equity dividend will
be comparatively lower.
Particulars
Long term
Liabilities (In
x10M Rs)
Total Shareholders
Funds (In x10M
Rs)
Debt-Equity Ratio
2009
841.041
2005
350.304
2004
395.032
2003
588.62
9344.9
8415.4
6853.9
5452.6
4378.8
3591.2
3098
9%
10%
6%
4%
8%
11%
19%
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the debt to equity ratio. For the year 2004 05 it is 8 %and
2005 06 is 4 % and increase in 2006 07 it is 6%.
This is a bad for company as compare to 2005-06 year is more debt ratio which
indicate the more realize on debt fund rather owned fund. The good impact is
interest burden will be more indirectly.
For the year 2008-09 and 2007-08 the debt equity ratio is 9% and 10%
respectively. As the higher debt equity ratio it shows the weaker financial
condition of the company. But, still it again varies for company to company.
54
Chapter 5
FINDINGS
55
AND
CONCLUSION
56
Maruti Suzuki India LTD. company has a trend of growth from 2003 to 2007.During the
financial year 2008-09 the there is downfall in the growth of the company. The main
reason behind this downfall is because of the global recession and the price of
commodities of Maruti was quite high in the commodity market. The downfall of net
profit during the financial year 2008-09 is 29.6% over the financial year 2007-2008.The
total sales numbers in 2009-10 mark a growth of 29% over last financial year. The export
sales of 147,575 units in the year2009-10 are the highest ever annual export by the
company.
Maruti has crossed sale of 1million cars and by achieving this now it has become
landmark for Maruti where other companies will take time to reach and of course they
have raise their bar for themselves also.
The financial statements are expressed in monetary values, so they appear to give
final and accurate position, but sometimes it does not give exact position.
The precision of financial statement data is not possible because the statements
deal with natters which cannot be precisely stated.
The company wanted not to disclose some of the analysis carried on. Hence some
of them are not included in this report.
The study had to be fully dependent upon past financial statements as such it may
fail to reflect the financial stand and capacity of the company a near future.
More emphasis has been laid on the accounting ratios as they reveal the trend over
a period.
A conclusion from this analysis is not real indications of the efficiency of the
management and hence requires further investigation.
The balance sheet ratio cannot be fully relied upon as the balance sheet show the
financial position as particular data.
For the industrial average comparisons analysis the data were not available.
Difference in definitions of basic concepts renders the comparison
inaccurate. Hence ratio value might vary significantly.
In spite of all these limitation, study was grand success as it helped to improve the
knowledge and give better experience and exposes to factory practice and surrounding all
the attempts have been made to make right type of interpretation and suggestion.
5.3 SUGGESTIONS
58
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
3. Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners by Ranjit Kumar Social Science - 2005
1. www.managementparadise.com
2. www.wikipedia.org
59
3. www.google.co
60