You are on page 1of 41

06/11/2013

Session 13

Quality of Service
(QoS)
QoS) definition and
standards
ITU ASP COE Training on
Wireless Broadband
Sami TABBANE

5-8 November 2013 Nadi (Fiji Islands)


1

CONTENTS

I.

Qos definitions and objectives

II.

Qos criteria

III. Evaluation of the QoS


IV. Quality of Service in GSM/GPRS
V.

Quality of Service in UMTS

VI. Quality of Service in LTE


VII. Summary

06/11/2013

CONTENTS

I.

QoS definitions and objectives

WHAT IS THE QUALITY OF SERVICE ?

Evolution approach

Classically
Performance optimization in lower layers
improvement of user QoS.
Top-down approach: Better achieved as
changes in lower layers may have different
impacts on application layers and user
services.

06/11/2013

GENERAL APPROACH

Definition

Capability of the cellular service providers to


provide a satisfactory service:
Voice quality,
Signal strength,
Low call blocking and dropping probability,
High data rates for multimedia and data
applications.

END TO END QoS

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IMPAIRMENT ORIGINS

Radio network performances (errors, planning),


Network capacity,
Network design (Transmission capacity),
Application design (inappropriate protocols used for
mobile environment),
Service support (technologies incorrectly configured
as compression, quality control, ).

QoS: DEFINITION

QoS (UIT-T):
The collective effect of service
performance
which determines the degree
of satisfaction of a user of the service.
Network Performance, NP (UIT-T):
The ability of a network or network
portion to provide the functions related to
communication between users.

06/11/2013

QoS: DEFINITION

QoS refers to the capability of a network to provide better


service to selected network traffic over specific underlying
technologies.
In packet-switched networks, QoS is described by the
following parameters:
Delay,
Jitter,
Loss probability,
Reliability,
Throughput,
Delivery time.
9

QoS: DEFINITION

General process of Qos


User domain: throughput, accuracy, dependability
(reliability, availability),
Provider domain: delay, loss, utilization,
User domain
User QoS
Requirements

Provider domain
QoS offered by
The Provider

QoS experienced
By the User

QoS achieved by
The User
10

06/11/2013

QoS: DEFINITION

QoS and NP, Performance network (ITU Rec. E800)


Quality of Service
Service support
(ability to
provide a service
and help its
usage)

Service
operability
(capacity of a
service to be
used)

Service
accessibility

Servce sustainability

Service
integrity

Service
security

Serveability performance
QoS
NP

Traffic performance
Billing
(probability that the
network accounts the
communications by
type, destination,

Resources and
environment

Dependability
(availability,
reliability,
maintenance, support)

Transmission

11

QUALITY OF SERVICE AND USER SATISFACTION

Competition

Commercial offer

Trends

Users expectations in terms of QoS

Users satisfaction

Technical QoS

Network
performance

Terminal
performance

Non-technical QoS

Sales points

Customer
care

12

06/11/2013

SLA (SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT)

ITU-T Rec. E.860 Framework of a service level


agreement (2002).
Formal definition of a relation between 2 entities at least
the service provider and his customer
Consists in:
Legal and financial specifications,
Service level specifications (technical)

13

SLA (SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT)

QoS is the degree of conformance of the service


delivered to a user by a provider with an agreement
between them.
Negotiation Phase
Documentation Phase
Implementation Phase
Maintenance and Reporting
Phase
Yes

Satisfaction (user/provider)
No

Termination Phase
14

06/11/2013

SLA (SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT)

Examples of SLA parameters

Generally measured in a monthly base


RTT (Round Trip Time),

Packet loss ratio (measured by ping ICMP),


Time percentage: the subscriber port is available to
exchange traffic
Gigue (delay between successive packets).
Sampling can be achieved on a 5 minutes basis typically.

15

SLA AND QoS IN RADIO NETWORK MOBILE

QoS criteria in wireless and mobility context

Accessibility,
Reliability,
Connection delay ,
Interruptions or drop of service, due to the lack of
network resources ,
Network coverage,
Roaming and Hand-Over performance,
Voice quality,
Data transfer Throughput ,
Interoperability between different area
16

06/11/2013

QoE CONCEPT

The quality experience (QoE) is


defined as the traditional extension
of the QoS.
QoE indicates the manner with
which services are offered in the
point of view user.
QoE describes how a user perceives the usability of a
service when in use, how satisfied he/she is with a service
in terms of, e.g., usability, accessibility, retainability and
integrity.
17

QoE DEFINITION (ITU(ITU-T SG12)

QoE is the overall acceptability of an application or


service, as perceived subjectively by the end-user.
Quality of Experience includes the complete end-toend system effects (client, terminal, network, services
infrastructure, etc.). Overall acceptability may be
influenced by user expectations and context.

18

06/11/2013

QoE DEFINITION (ITU(ITU-T SG12)

19

DEFINITION OF QoS PARAMETERS AND COMPUTATION

ETSI TS 102 250-2 V1.5.1


(2007-10)

20

10

06/11/2013

QoS INDICATOR CLASSES

Indicators classes

Network access,
Service access,
Service integrity,
Service sustainability.

21

USAGE PHASES (USER


(USER POINT OF VIEW)

Network Availability

Network Accessibility

Service Accessibility

Service Integrity

Service Retainability
22

11

06/11/2013

RELATION QOS CAPACITY LOAD

System capacity

Load for a predefined QoS

QoS

Load for a predefined


Capacity

QoS

System capacity for a


predefined load

23

CONTENTS

II. QoS criteria

24

12

06/11/2013

QOS CRITERIA

QoS User criteria

Classically (voice service) 4 main criteria allow


users to evaluate the network Quality of Service:
Coverage,
Call establishment,
Voice quality,
Call drop.

25

QOS CRITERIA

Qos Operator evaluation

Coverage
Cannot be assessed through the system.
Radio measurements and subscribers
Communication quality during the call
Radio measurements
System measurements
Voice quality analyzers
Successful call rate
System measurements
Call drop rate
System measurements
26

13

06/11/2013

QOS CRITERIA: OPERATOR STRATEGY

Application
server

Node B
RNC

3G
SGSN

3G GGSN

HLR

Conversational RAB
Streaming RAB
Interactive RAB, THP/ARP = 1
Interactive RAB, THP/ARP = 3
Background RAB

User profiles are stored in HLR.


Each user can have several user
profiles, which correspond to different
services and are mapped to different
bearers according to the operators
strategy.

27

QOS CRITERIA: OPERATOR STRATEGY

Operator can provide:


User differentiation with the
attribution of QoS profiles to
different users
Service differentiation with
corresponding to each service the
corresponding support according to
services characteristics.

o Satisfaction of different users


needed
o Allocation of the required
quality of service
o Usage optimization of
network resources
28

14

06/11/2013

QOS CRITERIA

Quality of Service Coverage


ITU Rec. 800: probability that the user
receives a signal in specific conditions
Reasons/Actions:
Number of sites
Position of the sites
Antennas type, direction and height (RF
design)
Output power and cable losses
(installation or maintenance).

29

QOS CRITERIA

Quality of Service Successful call rates


ITU Rec. 800: probability that a service
can be obtained by the user in certain
operational conditions
Reasons/Actions:
Minimum access level in the cell
Difference between the dimensioning of
the resources and the offered traffic
Interferences
Radio coverage

30

15

06/11/2013

CONTENTS

III. Test: Evaluation of the QoS

31

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Type of tests
1- Coverage GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS
2- Measurements quality of service voice
Accessibility
Maintainability of communication
Voice quality
3- Quality of service SMS
4- Quality of service DATA
MMS
WAP
FTP
32

16

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Coverage
Evaluation of the coverage (incar, indoor, outdoor)
Measurements in Idle mode
In Dedicated mode the power control distorts the
results
Threshold level of coverage:

Threshold
Values

Indoor
- 67dbm

Incar
- 87dbm

Outdoor
- 90dbm

33

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Measurements tools:
Laptop
Software
GPS
Trace mobile

Calibration of signal level strength


Necessary equipments: measurements tools
Measurements type: City, Route, train, Indoor

34

17

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Accessibility evaluation from a regulator point of view


Method
conduct several call attempts spaced with 30 seconds
minimum
Measure End To End by investigators or Drive test
campaign
Threshold blockage rate at busy hour: 2%

Accessibility rate = number successful of communications


(delay of connection < 10s )/total call attempts number

35

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Quality of Service Voice quality


Example: bad communication quality.

Reasons/Actions:
External interferences
Co-channel or adjacent channel interferences
Out-of-coverage
Bad installation
Transmission network (ex.: echo canceller or trunks).

36

18

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Voice Quality measurements principle

37

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Main factors impacting the Voice Quality

38

19

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Voice Quality measurements


ITU-T P.800 recommendation
Absolute Category Rating (ACR):
Excellent (5),
Good (4),
Fair (3),
Poor (2),
Bad (1).

39

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Quality of Service Call dropping

Reasons/Actions:

Coverage
Interference
Handover problems
Radio parameters
tuning

local

40

20

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Quality of Service MMS quality


Consist in an exchange of SMS between
two users equipments ( transmitter- receiver)
The evaluation indicators are:

Failure ratio
Number of errored messages
Delay of reception( <30s, 30 2 minutes, > 2 minutes).
Average reception delay

41

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

42

21

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Quality of Service MMS quality

43

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Quality of Service Data ( FTP)

44

22

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Example of measurements

45

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Example of measurements
Radio coverage

Faiblesse (Rxlev < -94 dBm)


(-94 dBm<Rxlev < -84 dBm)
(-84 dBm<Rxlev < -74 dBm)

Ax
e

Ro
ss
o

Indoor (Rxlev>-74dBm)
No
ua
dh
ib
ou
Ax
e
NK
C
/N
DB

No
ua
kc
ho
tt

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

46

23

06/11/2013

TEST: EVALUATION OF THE QOS

Example of measurements

47

CONTENTS

IV. Quality of Service in GSM/GPRS

48

24

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

GSM GoS (typical values)

Interfaces

Blocking rate

Um/TCH

2% (1 to 5%)

Um/SDCCH

0.1% (0 to 1%)

GSM-RTC

0.5% (0.1 to 1%)

0.1% (0 to 1%)

Abis

0%

Ater

0.1% (0 to 1%)

49

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Indicators

Outdoor

Indoor

Incar

Blockage rate

< 2%

< 2%

< 2%

Dropped rate

< 2%

< 2%

< 2%

Power in dBm

- 90

- 67

- 87

HO Success rate

> 90 %

Quality

RXQUAL < 4 for 95% f the samples

50

25

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

GPRS (QoS indicators)


QoS profile (limitation by the
throughput class supported by
the client)
Service maintain in case of
malfunctioning:
Priority
classes

Reliability
classes

1. High priority,
2. Medium priority,
3. Low priority.

Residual error correction (Data


loss, error data, ):
1. VIP subscription,
2. Subscription without error
sensitivity .

QoS services
Packet priority:
1. High: Conserve packet in case of
congestion,
2. Normal: Conserve packet after those
with high priority
3. Low: Eliminate packet in case of a
problem.
Probability loss, duplication :
1. Sensitive to errors, without
correction capacity , limitation of error
tolerance
2. Sensitive to errors, limitation
correction capacity , good tolerance
3. Sensitive to errors, good correction
capacity or very good tolerance
51

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

QoS GPRS profile (R97/R98)


QoS parameters of a PDP context:
Precedence class: 1, 2 et 3 (1has priority)
Delay Class: 1-4 (4 = best effort)
Reliability class:
1: GTP ACK, LLC ACK/protected, RLC ACK,
2: GTP UNACK, LLC ACK/protected, RLC ACK,
3: GTP UNACK, LLC UNACK/protected, RLC ACK,
4: GTP UNACK, LLC UNACK/protected, RLC UNACK,
5: GTP UNACK, LLC UNACK/non-protected, RLC UNACK,

Maximum throughput class: 1-9 (8 2 048 kb/s)


Medium throughput class: 1-19 (0,22 bits/s 111 kb/s)

52

26

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

One profile per Qos DPD context ,


Qos profile parameters non detailed in the standard
Control resources tools in the BSS are limited (best effort in
release 1),
Precedence per context PDP.
R97/R98 OK in case of low load per cell.

53

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

QoS GPRS profile (R99)


GPRS R99: Subset of QoS profile 3GPP
Allocation/retention priority (ARP)
Traffic class + Traffic handling priority (THP)
o Interactive: THP1-3,
o Background.
Reliability parameters:
o Residual BER,
o SDU error rate ,
o SDU delivery with error.
Maximum throughput
54

27

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Services:
o WAP,
o MMS: text, images, video clips.
Email,
Downloading,

55

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Other QoS indicators

Item

Excellent

Good

Average

Best Effort

MOS

4-5

3.8-4.2

2.9-3.8

2-2.9

Call
establishment
delay

< 1.5 sec.

1.5 3
sec.

> 3 sec.

> 3 sec.

Round-trip delay
(ms)

< 150

150 250

250
450

> 450

Jitter (ms)

<1

< 18

> 18

> 80

Packet loss (%)

<1

<5

< 10

< 10

56

28

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Transmission delay

Fixed network (PSTN): 35 msec end-to-end,


Node B RNC [3GPP]: < 10 ms,
UTRAN (real time services): < 5 ms,
UTRAN (non real time services): < 10 ms,
Radio interface: 70-80 msec in each direction.

Loss rate
UTRAN: < 10-4 (real time traffic), 10-7 (non real time
traffic)
57

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Round-trip transmission delays for IP packets

GPRS: 650 ms,


EDGE (R99): 300-500 ms,
UMTS: 200 ms.

58

29

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Indicators
Dropped call
Dropped call ( hardware causes)
Dropped call ( Radio causes)
Dropped HO
Blockage TCH
Blockage SDCCH
Call success establishment
HO (best cell)
HO (quality)
HO (strength signal level)
HO (interference)
HO (success)

Threshold
2%
1%
2%
1%
2%
0,5 %
95 %
50 %
30 %
20 %
1%
90 %

59

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Data throughput calculation


Average data
throughput

X% of data
throughput

Network coverage divided into pixels with the same


size (BTS closes pixels of the highest throughput to
those of cell border). Average throughput=Average
of all pixels
Throughput calculation pixel by pixel.
Minimum throughput= minimum Throughput
reached by least x% of pixels(ex.: 50%, 90%, 95%).

Minimum
guaranteed
throughput

Minimum guaranteed throughput with a probability


for a specific area

60

30

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Conversational real time services perceived by users


Application

Voice

Video phone

Telemetry

throughput
(en kb/s)

4 25

32 384

< 28,8

Performance parameters and target values


End to end
delay

Jitter

< 150 ms
Max: 400 ms

< 1 ms

< 150 ms
Max: 400 ms
Synchro. < 100
ms
< 250 ms

Information
loss
< 3% FER
Max: 5%
< 1% FER

61

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN GSM/GPRS

Evolution Voice QoS-Data QoS


Voice service
Avalibilibiliy of service or non

Service quality

Packet data services (GPRS/EGPRS)


Avaliability service with quality certain quality

Service quality

Distance MS-BTS

Distance MS-BTS

62

31

06/11/2013

CONTENTS

V. Quality of Service in UMTS

63

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

UMTS QoS classes

Traffic classes

Conversational

Streaming

Interactive

Background

Main
characteristics

Minimum jitter,
Low delay

Minimum
jitter

No delay
Question/response
constraints
mode,
Minimizes the
Minimizes the errors
errors

Example

Voice

Video

Web browsing

Emails

64

32

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

Multimedia services
Real time communications
Voice
Text
Video
Non real time communications
Audio streaming
Video streaming
Data files
Text messaging (ex. SMS)
Email
Web browsing
Multimedia messaging
65

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

Some values of QoS UMTS parameters classes


Traffic class

Conversation.

scheduling

Yes / No

Corrupted SDU delivery

Yes/No
5*10-2,

10-2,
5*10-3, 10-3,
10-4, 10-5, 10-6

4*10-3, 105, 6*10-8

4*10-3, 10-5,
6*10-8

10-2, 7*10-3, 10-3, 104, 10-5

10-1, 10-2,
7*10-3, 10-3,
10-4, 10-5

10-3, 10-4,
10-6

10-3, 10-4, 10-

100 maximum
value

250
maximum
value

5*10-2,

transfer delay (ms)

Background

1 500 or 1 502

max. SDU size (octets)

SDU error rate

Interactive

< 2048

maximum throughput (kb/s)

residual BER

Streaming

10-2,

5*10-3,

10-4, 10-6

66

33

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

QoS UMTS classes


End to end services used by terminal (TE, Terminal Equipment),
achieved by the combination of:

UMTS Bearer Service: defined by the RAB (Radio Access Bearer) and
the service of CN (Core Network),

Service RAB: Confidential transport of the signaling and data between


MT et CN. Services based on radio interface characteristics .

Service support CN: control and usage of core network.

Radio support (RB): covers all transport aspects of radio interface. The
support service Iu provide transport between UTRAN and CN.
67

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS: ARCHITECTURE MODEL

TE

UTRAN

MT

Node B

RNC

CN Iu Edge
Node

CN

CN
gtw

TE

End to end services


Support
TE/MT

RAB service

RRM

External
Service
Support

Service support UMTS

Radio service
support

Service
Support Iu

Service
UTRA
FDD/TDD

Physique
Service
Support

Service
support CN
Service
Support
Backbone

GTP Packets

ATM: manage ATM


traffic and division in cells
68

34

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS: QoS PARAMETERS

End to End QoS:


Traffic classes
Maximum throughput
Guaranteed throughput(conversational and streaming
classes),
Maximum SDU size,
SDU forma information,
SDU error rate,
Transfer delay,
Traffic priority treatment,
DSU delivery error ,
Allocation/ maintain priority.

69

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

QoS traffic classes


Traffic classes

Characteristics

Example

Conversational

Preserve time relation between


information entities of the stream.
Conversational pattern (low Delay)

Voice
Video call

Streaming

Preserve time relation between


information entities of the stream.

Streaming and
video real
time

Interactive

Request-response pattern.
Preserve payload content.

Web

Background

Destination is not expecting the data


within a certain time.
Preserve payload content.

E-mail
FTP

Constraints
Delay
Jitter

Constraints
Bit rate
Jitter

Tolerance
Delay and bit rate
Can changed
Integrity
More simple
Delay and bit rate
Can changed
Integrity

70

35

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

QoS attributs R99

Values example
5

Residual BER

10

SDU error ratio

10 4

Delivery of erraneous SDUs

No

Maximum SDU size (octets)

1500

Delivery order

No

Transfer delay

100 ms (conversational)
280 ms (streaming)

ARP

1, 2 or 3

Traffic classes

Conversational, streaming,
interactive, background

THP

1, 2 or 3 (same as ARP)

Maximum bit rate

e.g. 64, 128 or 384 kbps

Maximum guaranteed bit rate

e.g. 64, 128 or 384 kbps

Depends on
operator strategy

Depends on QoS
strategy and
capacity
of UE/RNC

71

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN UMTS

QoS traffic differentiation


Video
telephony
Streaming

Conversational RAB
Streaming RAB

Push-to-talk

Interactive RAB, THP/ARP = 1


Interactive RAB, THP/ARP = 3

Web
browsing

Background RAB

MMS
THP = Traffic Handling Priority
ARP = Allocation and retention priority
72

36

06/11/2013

CONTENTS

VI. Quality of Service in LTE

73

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

LTE QoS Framework


The traffic running between a particular client application and a
service can be differentiated into separate service data flows
(SDFs)
SDFs mapped to the same bearer receive a common QoS
treatment

74

37

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

LTE bearer
A bearer is assigned a scalar value referred to as a QoS class
identifier (QCI)
Guaranteed bit rate (GBR)
Non-guaranteed bit rate (non-GBR)

A non-GBR bearer is referred to as the default bearer,


which is also used to establish IP connectivity.

75

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

QoS attributes associated with the LTE bearer


QoS class identifier (QCI)
A scalar representing a set of packet forwarding treatments
Allocation and retention priority (ARP)
A parameter used by call admission control and overload
control
Maximum bit rate (MBR)
Guaranteed bit rate (GBE)
Aggregate MBR (AMBR)
The total amount of bit rate of a group of non-GBR bearers

76

38

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

LTE standardized QCI characteristics

77

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

LTE Air Interface Scheduler


The LTE air interface scheduler uses the following information
as input
Radio conditions at the UE identified
The QoS attributes of bearers
The interference situation in the neighboring cells

78

39

06/11/2013

QUALITY OF SERVICE IN LTE

Buffer Status Reporting


The buffer status reporting mechanism informs the UL packet
scheduler about the amount of buffered data at the UE
A periodic BSR trigger does not cause a service request
(SR) transmission from the UE
Otherwise, the SR is transmitted via a random access
procedure
Short format can be used to report on one radio
bearer group
Long format one can be used for four groups
79

CONTENTS

VII. Summary

80

40

06/11/2013

Summary

Summary

Various schemes have been seen for


maintaining QoS in cellular Networks and each
has its advantages and disadvantages
Multimedia services are delay sensitive and
require high bandwidth.
Renegotiation and channel reuse are good
techniques to assure better QoS and high data
rate

81

Thank you

82

41

You might also like