Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AP
ijpam.eu
Abstract: We introduce new subclasses of starlike and convex functions with respect to symmetric and conjugate points. The coefficient estimates,
coefficient inequalities for these classes are obtained. Also relevant connection
of our classes to classical Fekete-Szego theorem is briefly discussed.
AMS Subject Classification: 30C45
Key Words: analytic functions, coefficient estimates, symmetric, conjugate,
Fekete-Szego theorem
1. Introduction
Let () be the class of functions which are analytic and univalent in the open
unit disc U = {z : |z| < 1} given by
h(z) = (z ) +
bn (z )n
n=1
and satisfying the conditions h() = 0, |h(z)| < 1, z U and is a fixed point
in U .
Received:
A.T. Oladipo
Let S() denote the class of functions f which are analytic and univalent
in U of the form
f (z) = (z ) +
ak (z )k
(1)
k=2
ST () = S () = f (z) S() : Re
> 0, z U
f (z)
(z )f (z)
> 0, z U
CV () = S () = f (z) S() : 1 + Re
f (z)
c
and is a fixed point in U . Also Acu and Owa [2] further used (1) to extend
the two classes above and to even introduced the class of close to
convex functions. Oladipo in [3,4] also extends the above classes by using
Ruscheweyh derivative operator and Salagean operator on them and to develop
certain classes of Bazilevic functions of type [4]. In all the Literatures cited
above, the authors obtained many useful and interesting results.
Wald in [8] established that if P () P (class of caratheodory functions),
and p(z) is of the form
p(z) = 1 +
pk (z )k
(2)
k=1
then
|pk |
2
, k 1 and || = d.
(1 + d)(1 d)k
AB
,
(1 + d)(1 d)k
k 1, 1 B < A 1 and || = d :
(3)
The author here wish to use (1) to define the following classes of functions with
respect to symmetric and conjugate points.
, 1 B < A 1, z U
f (z) f (z)
1 + B(z )
and is a fixed point in U .
(ii) Let Sc (, A, B) be the subclass of S() consisting of functions given by
(1) satisfying the condition
2(z )f (z)
f (z) + f (z)
1 + A(z )
, 1 B < A 1, z U,
1 + B(z )
A.T. Oladipo
h U, (5)
pk (z )k
k=1
and
|pk |
AB
(1 + d)(1 d)k
k 1, || = d
2. Main Result
In this section we give the coefficient inequalities for classes s (, , A, B) and
c (, , A, B),
Theorem 2.1. Let f s (, , A, B). Then for k = 2, 3, 4, 5., 0 1
AB
2(1 + )(1 d2 )
AB
|a3 |
2(1 + 2)(1 d2 )(1 d)
(A B) [A B + 2(1 + d)]
|a4 |
2.4(1 + 3)(1 d2 )2 (1 d)
(A B) [A B + 2(1 + d)]
|a5 |
2.4(1 + 4)(1 d2 )2 (1 d)2
|a2 |
(6)
A.T. Oladipo
+ p3 (z )4 + (1 + 2)p3 a3 (z )6 + (1 + 4)p3 a5 (z )8 + ...
+ p4 (z )5 + (1 + 2)p4 a3 (z )7 + (1 + 4)p4 a5 (z )9 + ...
+ p5 (z )6 + (1 + 2p5 a3 (z )8 + ...
AB
2(1 + )
|a3 |
AB
2(1 + 2)
|a4 |
(A B) [A B + 2]
2.4(1 + 3)
|a5 |
(A B) [A B + 2]
2.4(1 + 4)
AB
2.2
|a3 |
AB
2.3
|a4 |
(A B) [A B + 2]
2.4.4
|a5 |
(A B) [A B + 2]
2.4.5
|a3 |
AB
(1 + )(1 d2 )
(7)
A B [(A B) + (1 + d)]
2(1 + 2)(1 d2 )2
(A B) (A B)2 + 3(A B)(1 + d) + 2(1 + d)2
|a4 |
2.3(1 + 3)(1 d2 )3
(A B) (A B)3 + 6(1 + d)(A B)2 + 11(1 + d)2 (A B) + 6(1 + d)3
|a5 |
2.3.4(1 + 4)(1 d2 )4
Proof. From (3) and (5), we have
(z ) + 2(1 + )a2 (z )2 + 3(1 + 2)a3 (z )3 + 4(1 + 3)a4 (z )4
+ 5(1 + 4)a5 (z )5 + ...
= (z ) + (1 + )a2 (z )2 + (1 + 2)a3 (z )3 + (1 + 3)a4 (z )4
+ (1 + 4)a5 (z )5 + ...
+ P1 (z )2 + (1 + )p1 a2 (z )3 + (1 + 2)p1 a3 (z )4 + (1 + 3)p1 a4 (z )5
A.T. Oladipo
+ (1 + 4)p1 a5 (z )6 + ...
|a3 |
AB
(1 + )(1 d2 )
(8)
A B [(A B) + (1 + d)]
2(1 + 2)(1 d2 )2
(A B) (A B)2 + 3(A B)(1 + d) + 2(1 + d)2
|a4 |
2.3(1 + 3)(1 d2 )3
(A B) (A B)3 + 6(1 + d)(A B)2 + 11(1 + d)2 (A B) + 6(1 + d)3
|a5 |
2.3.4(1 + 4)(1 d2 )4
which complete the proof.
If we set d = 0 in Theorem 2.2, we have
Corollary C. Let f c (, , A, B). Then for k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 0 1
|a2 |
|a3 |
AB
(1 + )
(A B) [A B + 1)]
2(1 + 2)
(A B) (A B)2 + 3(A B) + 2
|a4 |
2.3(1 + 3)
(A B) (A B)3 + 6(A B)2 + 11(A B) + 6
|a5 |
2.3.4(1 + 4)
If we set = 1 in Theorem 2.2, we have
Corollary D. Let f c (, , A, B). Then for k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 0 1
|a2 |
|a3 |
AB
2
(A B) [A B + 1)]
2.3
(A B) (A B)2 + 3(A B) + 2
|a4 |
2.3.4
(A B) (A B)3 + 6(A B)2 + 11(A B) + 6
|a5 |
2.3.4.5
Our next result is to briefly look at the relevant connection of our classes
to the classical Fekete-Zsego Theorem [7,9].
Theorem 2.3. Let f s (, , A, B). Then
2
a3 a22 (A B)(1 d) 2(1 + ) (1 + d) (A B)(1 + 2) ,
4(1 + )2 (1 + 2)(1 d2 )2 (1 d)
0, (9)
a2 a4 a23
(A B)2 (1 d) (A B)(1 + 2)2 + 2(1 + d)(1 + 2)2 4(1 + )(1 + 3)(1 + d)
10
A.T. Oladipo
2
2
2
a2 a4 a2 (A B) [(A B) + 3(A B)(1 + d) + 2(1 + d) ]
3
2.3(1 + )(1 + 3)(1 d2 )4
(A B)2 [(A B)2 + (1 + d)2 ]
22 (1 + 2)2 (1 d2 )4
X
k=2
o
n
[(k 1) + 1] (r + d)k 2k (1 (1)k ) + A((1 (1)k ) 2Bk) ak
2(r + d) [A(1 ) B]
X
X
2k((k 1) + 1)ak (z )k
(1 (1)k )((k 1) + 1)ak (z )k =
k=2
k=2
|2(A(1 ) B)(z )|
X
X
+ ((k 1) + 1)(1 (1)k )ak (z )k
2Bk((k 1) + 1)ak (z )k
k=2
X
k=2
k=2
h
i
[(k 1) + 1] 2k (1 (1)k ) |ak | (r + d)k = 2(r + d) [A(1 ) B]
+
X
k=2
X
k=2
[(k 1) + 1] A(1 (1)k ) 2Bk |ak |(r + d)k
o
n
[(k 1) + 1] r + d)k 2k (1 (1)k ) + A(1 (1)k ) 2Bk |ak |
2(r + d) [A(1 ) B]
11
f (z)
(z)f (z)
f (z)
<1
i
h
(z)
(z)f
(f
(z)f
(z))
(1)(f
(z)f
(z))
A
B
1
+
+
(z)f (z)
f (z)
f (z)
(z)
(1)[f (z)f (z)]
(f (z)f (z))
1 + (z)f
f (z)
(z)f (z)
f (z)
h(z) =
i
h
(z)f (z)
A (1)(f (z)f (z)) + (f (z)f (z))
B 1+
(z)f (z)
f (z)
f (z)
then h() = 0, h(z) is analytic |z | < 1 and |h(z)| < 1 which shows that
f (z) (, , A, B).
References
[1] S. Kanas, F. Ronning, Uniformly starlike and convex functions and
other related classes of univalent functions, Ann. UNiv. Mariae Curie Sklodowska Section A, 53 (1999), 95-105.
[2] Acu Mugur, Shigeyoshi Owa, On some subclasses of univalent functions,
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 6, No. 3, Article
70 (2005), 1-14.
[3] A.T. Oladipo, On a subclasses of univalent functions, Advances in Applied
Mathematical Analysis, 4, No. 2 (2009), 87-93.
[4] A.T. Oladipo, On certain subclasses of analytic and univalent functions
involving convolution operators, Acta Universitatis Apulensis and Informatics, No. 20 (2009), 163-174.
[5] R.M. Goel, B.C. Mehrok, A subclass of starlike functions with respect to
symmetric points, Tamkang J. Math., 13, No. 1 (1982), 11-24.
[6] C. Selvaraj, N. Vasanthi, Subclasses of analytic functions with respect to
symmetric and conjugate points, Tamkang J. Math., 42, No. 1 (2011),
87-94.
12
A.T. Oladipo