468 views

Uploaded by RamBinodSharma

Effect of Fineness of Sand

- EUROPEAN SPECIFICATION FOR SPRAYED CONCRETE
- Sual, Pangasinan
- Irrawaddy Dam EAI Review by BANCA - 2009
- Sixteenth Power (Masinloc Thermal Power) Project (Loan 1042-PHI)
- Dams
- Gravity Dam
- Rcc-Design Mixes Nits
- Definition of Gabbro
- effect of sand grading on characteristics of mortar
- process for making cellular concrete
- ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE.pdf
- IS 269 - 2015
- Concrete & Aggregates as
- Power Plant in the Philippines
- Mixing Ratio
- STUDIES ON FLY ASH CONCRETE UNDER SULPHATE ATTACK IN ORDINARY, STANDARD AND HIGHER GRADES AT EARLIER AGES
- rcc Dams
- Cellular Concrete
- Gravity Dams
- Free Trial Project Management Software _ Primavera P3, SureTrak, ChangeAide, Primavera Contractor 6

You are on page 1of 8

Prashant Agrawal, QC Manager, HCC Ltd. Dr. Y.P. Gupta, Materials Consultant, BCEOM-LASA JV,

Suryakanta Bal, QC Engineer, HCC Ltd. Allahabad Bypass Project, Allahabad, UP.

The grading and maximum size of aggregates is important parameters in any concrete mix. They

affect relative proportions in mix, workability, economy, porosity and shrinkage of concrete etc.

Experience has shown that very fine sands or very coarse sands are objectionable the former is

uneconomical, the latter gives harsh unworkable mixes. Thus the object in this paper is to find the

best fineness modulus of sand to get the optimum grading of combined aggregate (all-inaggregate), which is most suitable, and for economy. In general, the grading of aggregates, which

do not have a deficiency or excess of any size of aggregate and give a smooth grading curve,

produce the most suitable concrete mix. Further a cohesive mix is also desired for the pumped

concrete produced by RMC Plant. In the present investigations, effect of the grading of river sand

particles has been investigated for a good Concrete mix. Sand has been sorted in three categories

i.e. Fine, Medium, and Coarse. These were mixed with coarse aggregate in different proportions so

as to keep the combined Fineness Modulus (all-inaggregate) more or less the same. Various

proportions of such aggregate are mixed in preparing M 30 grade of Concrete mix. Effect is studied

on concrete workability, cube strength, flexural strength and permeability. The results indicate that

with the change in fineness of sand, workability gets affected. The details of findings and its effect

on compressive and flexural strength and permeability, influencing durability are reported in this

paper.

Introduction

Fineness Modulus is a term used as an index to the fineness or coarseness of aggregate. This is

the summation of cumulative percentage of materials retained on the standard sieves divided by

100. It is wellknown that aggregate plays an important role in achieving the desired properties of

concrete. Though, aggregate constitute 80 to 90% of the total volume of concrete, yet very

littleattention is given in controlling the grading and surface texture of aggregate to optimize the

properties of concrete. Improper blend of aggregate influences the cement and water demand for

a given concrete mix and affects workability, compactibility, and cohesion characteristics of

pumpable concrete mix. It also influences the compressive strength, flexural strength and other

properties like permeability & durability of concrete.

IS 383: "Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete." This

publication deals with specifications for Coarse and Fine aggregates from natural sources for

Concrete. These specifications do not specify any limit for fineness modulus to be used in concrete.

It divides the sand in four zones i.e. from Zone I to Zone IV. Zone ISand being very coarse and

Zone 4 sand is very fine. It is generally recommended by code to use sands of zones I to Zone III

for

Structural

concrete

works.

AASTHO Designation: M6-93- "Standard Specification for Fine Aggregate For Portland Cement

Concrete"- It indicates that the fineness modulus of sand will not be less than 2.3 and nor more

than 3.1. Further, fine aggregate failing to meet the fineness modulus requirement as above may

be accepted, provided concrete made with similar fine aggregate from the same source has an

acceptable performance record in similar concrete construction; or in absence of a demonstrable

service record, provided, it is demonstrated that concrete of the class specified, made with the fine

aggregate under consideration, will have relevant properties at least equal to those of concrete

made with the same ingredients, with the exception that a reference fine aggregate be used which

is selected from a source having an acceptable performance record in similar concrete

construction.

ASTM Designation: C33-93- standard specification for concrete aggregates"The fine aggregate

shall have not more than 45% passing any sieve and retained on the next consecutive sieve and

its fineness modulus will not be less than 2.3 and not more than 3.1. Rest is the same as for

AASTHO

M6-93.

U.S.B.R: The code has specified that the fineness modulus of sand shall not be less than 2.50 and

not more 3.0.

Experimental Investigation

In the present investigations, the effect of Fineness Modulus of sand has been investigated. The

Fine aggregate (Sand) taken is Yamuna river sand and coarse aggregate taken is Dolomite

limestone in crushed form. It has been sorted in several categories starting the Fineness Modulus

(FM) of sand from 2.0 to 3.0. These were mixed in different proportions to get a consistent

combined FM. The combined FM is determined like All-in-aggregate FM. In the present study we

have selected M30 Grade of concrete mix. To find out the effect of fineness modulus (FM) of sand

on concrete, sand of different FM from 2.0 to 3.0 is chosen. Two sizes of coarse aggregate

particles: i.e. 20 & 10 mm, which are generally used in standard concrete mix, were chosen for the

investigations.

Concrete

Mix

Concrete

Grade

Water-Cement

OPC

Aggregate

Aggregate

(350

Ratio

plasticizer

Yamuna

Coarse

0.45

grade

Cement

Super

M30

:

53

to

Admixture:

River

Kg)

5.52

(as

Sand

required)

(Average

777Kg)

Aggregate:

Crushed

The

Ratio

Cement:

Fine

Selected:

Stone

material

Dolomite;

(Average

properties

are

given

1155Kg)

in

Table

1.

When we choose very fine sand (i.e. FM 2.0), and very coarse sand (i.e. of FM 3.0), and if the

proportion of sand is fixed in the mix then due to poor all-inaggregate grading, the mix may

become very harsh or not give correct results. So in present study proportions of coarse aggregate

and fine aggregate, are slightly adjusted in the mixes to keep allin- aggregate grading within

envelope of desired all-inaggregate grading given in IS: 383. The FM of combined mix is kept in

range

of

4.94

to

4.97

as

seen

from

Table

2.

In this study water-cement ratio (W/C) of mix is kept constant for all the trial mixes with sand of

different fineness modulus. Workability of mix is also fixed in range of 45 to 55 mm slump. Since

mix with so different fineness modulus of sand, will result in different water demands, so

watercement ratio is kept constant and to adjust workability slight adjustments in admixture

dosages has been made. Various proportions of such ingredients are mixed in laboratory mixer of

0.1 capacity for preparing M30 grade of Concrete mix. Cubes (150 x 150 x 150 mm size), cylinders

(150 x 150 mm height) and beams (150 x 150 x 700 mm length) are cast. Effect of varying FM

of sand is studied on concrete density, workability, compressive strength, flexural strength and

permeability.

Observations & Discussion of Results

Table 3 gives the total observations recorded during the experimental investigations. Effect on

Workability, Density, Strength, and Permeability due to variations in FM of sand is discussed here.

A. Workability of Concrete Mix: The workability of concrete mix was measured with the help of 300

mm standard size slump cone. A little amount of admixture dose was added to concrete mix. Each

time concrete mix was examined for the behavior in slump, segregation and Bleeding etc. The

slump observed was about 50 mm in all cases. No segregation or bleeding was observed in the

mix.

Figure 1, shows the type of slump observed. The results indicate that with the increase in fineness

modulus of sand, water demand in the mix got affected consequently workability gets affected.

Since water-cement ratio is kept constant, so to keep workability in the same range of 50 mm,

admixture dosages were varied. The admixture dosages reduced considerably as fineness of sand

increases as shown in Figure 2. The Figure 2 shows that:

Admixture Dosage reduced from 1.0 percent to 0.2 percent as sand fineness modulus

increases from 2.0 to 3.0.

After measuring the slump, several 150 mm cubes were filled. These were cured in water tank for

28 days. After curing, each cube was weighed using electronic balance and density of concrete was

calculated. The variation of density with FM of sand is shown in Figure 3 for different cases. From

this figure, it is evident that there is slight increase in density i.e. 0.80 to 1.20 percent, when

fineness modulus increases from 2.0 to 3.0.

Effect of Fineness of Sand on Compressive Strength of Concrete

Cubes of 150 mm were tested for compressive strength at 7 and 28 days. This compressive

strength is given in table 3 for varying FM of sand. The variation is shown in Figure 4. The figure

indicates that:

As fineness modulus of sand changes from 2.0 to 2.5 there is an increase in compressive

strength from 43.07 to 49.00 MPa. i.e. strength increases by 14%. On the other hand by

increasing Fineness Modulus from 2.5 to 3, Compressive strength increases from 49.00 to

For Every 0.1 increase in FM of sand from 2.0 to 3.0, 28 days Compressive Strength increases

by 2.5 to 3.0%.

7 days compressive strength also increases in the similar proportion.

There is faster increase in strength towards coarser side of sand.

Flexural strength is calculated from 28 days testing of beam of size 150x150x700 mm by using

following

formula.

Flex. Strength = P x 1000 x L / [b x d x d], for a > 200 mm but less than 200 mm

=

(3000

Result

a)

(b

is

d),

for

discarded

>

170

when

mm

a

but

less

>

than

170

200

mm

mm

Where,

b

d

=

=

width

depth

of

of

sample

sample

at

the

beam

point

of

(150

failure

(1500

mm).

mm).

a = distance between the line of fracture and the nearest support (recorded for each sample after

test).

P

L

=

=

total

support

failure

length

of

specimen

Load.

(600

mm).

The variation of flexural strength with respect to different parameters is also given in Figure 4.

This figure indicates the following:

As fineness modulusincreases from 2.0 to 2.5 there is an increase in 28 days flexural strength

from 3.82 to 4.25 MPa i.e. strength increases by 11.25%. On the other hand by increasing

Fineness Modulus from 2.5 to 3, the strength increases from 4.25 to 4.81 MPa resulting in

For Every 0.1 increase in FM of sand from 2.0 to 3.0, Flexural Strength increases by 2.1 to

.5%

The increase in strength is more towards coarser side of sand.

Permeability of concrete is determined by using cylinder specimen having 150 mm diameter and

160 mm height. They were applied water pressure of 7 Kg/ cm 2 for 96 hours in the Permeability

Apparatus

shown

in

Figure

5.

Immediately after 96 hours cylinders were split under line load test. The depth of penetration of

water in cylinder was measured as well as volume of water lost is recorded.

The results are interpreted as:

1. Average depth of water penetration in cylinder is measured

2. Coefficient of permeability is calculated as volume of water lost divided by volume of concrete

penetrated with water i.e.

Permeability coefficient = vol. of water lost / (Area of cylinder x Average depth of concrete having

effect

of

penetration

of

water).

The Permeability Coefficient of concrete Vs FM of sand is plotted in figures 6. It is seen from figure

that permeability coefficient is more or less constant with respect to fineness of sand. Thus FM of

sand has very little impact on Permeability Coefficient of Concrete and the value remains more or

less constant.

Failure Pattern of Beams & Cubes

1. It is generally seen that the failure occurs at the interface of aggregate and mortar.

2. In flaky aggregate, some voids are observed at the interface of concrete and mortar.

Elongated aggregate pieces are broken.

3. Mortar matrix isgenerally crushed.

Cost Benefit Ratio

Cost of Concrete mix per is calculated on the basis of unit cost of each ingredient material in the

mix. The following market rates have been taken for Cement, Sand, Coarse aggregate, Admixture

and a nominal cost for water. No labor cost has been added in the calculation as it will remain

constant.

Cement:

Sand*

Rs.

:

Rs.

0.30

Coarse

to

4.25

Rs.

0.32

Aggregate:

Admixture:

per

Kg

(depending

Rs.

Rs.

Water:

per

Fineness

0.75

40.00

Rs.

upon

Kg

per

per

0.10

per

of

Sand)

Kg

Kg

Kg.

* Rate of Sand for FM 2.0 to 2.3 is Rs. 0.30 per Kg, for FM 2.4 to 2.7 is Rs. 0.31 per Kg, and for F.

M. 2.8 to 3.0 Rs. 0.32 per Kg. The variation of rate of sand depends on market which can have

much

more

difference.

The quantities of ingredients for one of concrete are given in table 4 (a). Cost of concrete is

calculated by taking above rates and quantities given in table 4 (a). On the basis of cost calculated

for concrete and the corresponding 28 day compressive strength, the cost benefit ratio is

calculated as follows. This is given in Table 4 (b)

a.

Cost of concrete is calculated in terms of quantity of material used & market rates as given

above.

b.

C/B

ratio

Total

cost

of

Concrete/28

days

Compressive

Strength

A curve has been plotted between FM of sand Vs C/B Ratio as shown in Figure 6. From this graph,

it is seen that C/B ratio reduces considerably as the FM of sand increases. From FM varying from

2.0 to 3.0 the C/B ratio reduces by 71%. Thus, it is advisable to use coarser sand in Concrete.

Conclusion

Fineness Modulus of Sand affects Compressive and flexural strength of Concrete. Sand, with higher

FM, results in higher strength of concrete. It is evident by cost benefit ratio that overall concrete

mix is becoming economical if we use sand with higher FM. The results indicate that with the

increase in FM, workability gets affected considerably. The cement demand also gets modified.

Some of the observations are given below:

Fineness Modulus has larger impact on 28 days Compressive & Flexural Strength.

Fineness Modulus has very little impact on Permeability of Concrete. Permeability coefficientis

changed by about 2% for FM from 2.0 to 3.0.

Fineness Modulus also affects the density of concrete. It increases by about 2.3% as the FM

increases from 2.0 to 3.0. Optimum value of density and other parameters are obtained when

FM is 2.8.

The optimum value of strength can be taken when workability of concrete is also good. It is

The net cost of Concrete reduces when FM of sand increases. It reduces by about 6.5% for an

As the fineness modulus of Sand increases, the Cost/Benefit Ratio reduce by a very large

factor. This is 29% when FM changes from 2.0 to 3.0. That means we can get large advantage

by using concrete having Coarse Sand.

A well adjusted grading (all-inaggregate) of concrete mix is also suitable for pumped concrete

produced through RMC Plant. This is achieved by using a sand having FM of around 2.5.

- EUROPEAN SPECIFICATION FOR SPRAYED CONCRETEUploaded byspiridisp
- Sual, PangasinanUploaded bySun.Star Philippine news
- Irrawaddy Dam EAI Review by BANCA - 2009Uploaded byminhtunlay
- Sixteenth Power (Masinloc Thermal Power) Project (Loan 1042-PHI)Uploaded byIndependent Evaluation at Asian Development Bank
- DamsUploaded byveenabalu20
- Gravity DamUploaded byFarhat Javed
- Rcc-Design Mixes NitsUploaded byNitish Thakur
- Definition of GabbroUploaded bySuhendar Trianto
- effect of sand grading on characteristics of mortarUploaded bymaniram7
- process for making cellular concreteUploaded bydebmallya4037
- ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE.pdfUploaded byAdrian Luis Hernandez Garcia
- IS 269 - 2015Uploaded byArun Singh
- Concrete & Aggregates asUploaded byAbhijith Meleveettil
- Power Plant in the PhilippinesUploaded byAlex Alo
- Mixing RatioUploaded bySuman Maity
- STUDIES ON FLY ASH CONCRETE UNDER SULPHATE ATTACK IN ORDINARY, STANDARD AND HIGHER GRADES AT EARLIER AGESUploaded bysunleon31
- rcc DamsUploaded byJoey Cross
- Cellular ConcreteUploaded byjovzare
- Gravity DamsUploaded bydsananda
- Free Trial Project Management Software _ Primavera P3, SureTrak, ChangeAide, Primavera Contractor 6Uploaded byalbertorr65
- Erosion Abrasion and Cavitation of ConcreteUploaded byS Praveenkumar
- Concrete in Hydro-power structuresUploaded bybaig951
- Cellular Concrete ArticleUploaded byabduyassin8014
- RCC Dams a New WaveUploaded byjhoward2012np
- 2014 Effect of the aggregate grading on the concrete air permeability.pdfUploaded bymanolo5555
- Concrete Admixtures: Effectiveness, functions and varieties.Uploaded byarancypp
- 6. Concrete AggregatesUploaded byAthiyo Martin
- Thermal Properties of ConcreteUploaded byS Praveenkumar
- Sulphate Attack and Chloride PenetrationUploaded byMahmood Mufti

- ceUploaded byAmanjot Singh
- Column bbs calculationUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- F02. Weekly Quality Observation Report - LTCDWSW&CWSBGQMQISF02 REV-0Uploaded byRamBinodSharma
- 03_tips on AggregateUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- 03_tips on AggregateUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- 5S TrainingUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Bituminous FormatUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Formats CIVILUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Anoothi_Kah.pdfUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Anoothi_Kah.pdfUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Tips on cement storage.pptxUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Best PracticeUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- AbhishapUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- MethodologyUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Bitumen ContentUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- CalculationUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Flaw calc fnUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Curing ConcreteUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- 6.Concrete Mix Design M-60Uploaded byKiran Kumar
- Adjustment of Miosture ContentUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Monthly Cement 29.10.13Uploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Calculation for Cutting in PipesUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Internal Audit Guide Line Time OfficeUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Compaction FormatUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Design CalculationUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- Lab Equipment ListUploaded byRamBinodSharma
- CalibrationUploaded byRamBinodSharma

- Instalacion y Mantenimiento FT FTI OKUploaded byAura Ramirez
- Compendium-of-en-1993-1-1Uploaded byahemadam
- Army Engineer Mil. Nonstandard Fixed BridgingUploaded bySpace_Hulker
- Conjugate Beam MethodUploaded byAmit
- Workover Program KE23B2Uploaded byMalau Arief
- 28.SPCE10084Uploaded byIJIRAE- International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering
- shear box testUploaded byEya Iyan
- CatalogUploaded bylangtu2011
- Unifamiliari UH ILCUploaded byZoran Tesla Borojevic
- Coiled Tubing IntroductionUploaded byKevin Steinbach
- Arema Mre 2015 Toc-Vol2 Ch15Uploaded byDav89
- Modul 2 FittingUploaded bypetrocamp71
- ASTM A312-2004 (Especificaciones Tuberia Acero Inoxidable).pdfUploaded bycesar_p80-1
- NorthAmericanIndustries_CraneBrochureUploaded byopreamih
- Example Vessel Re RatingUploaded byR Bharath Kumar
- Sika Paver HCUploaded byLuqmanuel Hugoz Savalovic
- Steel_Pipes_Tubes_Eng.pdfUploaded bysintaprisillia
- 59WPPC1316989199Structural Connections Precast Concrete Buildings - Parte 02 de 04Uploaded byOrnela Lalaj Şen
- 1- Analysis & Design of PCCP - ShirazUploaded byMA Ing Francisco Leal Garcia
- Dana Composite Panels Cladding ProfilesUploaded byadam150161
- Application of Composite Materials in AutomobilesUploaded bySaurabh Patnoorkar
- Is 1904 Code of Practice for Design and Construction of FounUploaded byAlakananda Sen
- 12-2 Head CilinderUploaded byMilthon Solano Castro
- 02 CementUploaded byAfendi Ariff
- Paper 06Uploaded byyogi_swarn
- cattle housingUploaded byRishiraj Nale
- stressUploaded byGerald Campañano
- Berg CatallogueUploaded byEnrique Quintano
- Dac 31903 Unit 1Uploaded bykishen972
- Design Components for Structural GlazingUploaded bynonspod