Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/hydromet
Abstract
Emulsion liquid membranes (ELMs) can contribute to process intensification of copper extraction, by significantly reducing the
solvent and carrier requirements in comparison with conventional solvent extraction. This investigation reports the extraction of
copper into emulsion liquid membranes using LIX 84 as carrier. The influence of four emulsion composition variables, namely the
internal phase volume fraction (), surfactant concentration (Wsurf), internal phase stripping acid concentration (Cio) and the carrier
concentration (Cc) as well as three process parameters pH, initial solute concentration (Ceo) and treat ratio (TR) on the rates of
extraction of copper, was studied. The emulsions used were characterized on the basis of internal drop size distribution and
viscosity to set a benchmark for the commercial application of this technology.
It was found that extraction was favorable above pH 2, extraction rates pass through maxima with increase in carrier
concentration and treat ratio. Increase in stripping capacities either by increase of or increase in Cio enhanced the extraction rates.
Effect of variables on emulsion swelling were investigated; data suggest that entrainment swelling of emulsion was predominant.
Swelling was observed to be serious only after 30 min of contact between the emulsion and the feed phases. Optimal conditions for
the successful implementation of ELM extraction of copper on commercial scale are suggested.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Copper extraction; Emulsion liquid membranes; LIX 84; Rates; Emulsion composition; Emulsion swelling
1. Introduction
The global demand for refined copper is approximately 13 million tons per annum. International Copper
Study Group estimates that 13% of the refined copper
production from ores is by Solvent Extraction ElectroWinning (SX-EW) Technology. This technology
Corresponding author. Fax: +91 0265 2423898.
E-mail addresses: bina_msu@yahoo.co.in (B. Sengupta),
ranjan_msu@yahoo.co.in (R. Sengupta),
nsmanyambaroda@yahoo.com (N. Subrahmanyam).
0304-386X/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.04.002
44
2HRorg Cu2
aq CuR2org 2Haq
45
152C271C containing n-paraffins (27%), naphthenes (56%), aromatics (16%) and olefins (1%) having
density (15) of 821.3 kg/m3 was used as the membrane
material. Span 80 (Sorbitan mono-oleate), supplied by
S.D. Fine Chemicals, was the emulsifier. The carrier,
kerosene and the emulsifier were used directly as
received from the manufacturer. All other reagents
used were of AR grade.
3. Experimental
The W/O emulsions were formulated by blending
kerosene, containing the requisite amount of carrier
(LIX 84) and emulsifier (Span 80), with the internal
stripping phase, sulfuric acid, using a high-speed
blender at 12,000 rpm. The resulting milky white W/O
emulsion was cured for 30 min prior to dispersion in the
feed phase.
Extraction was carried out at 30 C in a four baffled
batch extractor 0.105 m in diameter equipped with a six
bladed disk turbine agitator having disk diameter
0.038 m. The copper feed solutions were prepared
synthetically by dissolving CuSO4 5H2O in deionised
water. The pH of the feed was adjusted using H2SO4 or
Na2CO3. Requisite amount of the emulsion was added
to the feed phase by mild agitation so as to maintain the
required treat ratio (ratio of volume of emulsion to feed).
Samples from the feed phase were withdrawn at definite
time intervals and analyzed for copper concentration
using AAS (Chemito AA 203) at 324.8 nm. On
completion of the extraction run, the two phases were
separated and the final volume of the emulsion was
noted to get an estimate of swelling of the emulsion due
to water transport. Extraction data are presented as plots
of the ratio of instantaneous copper concentration to
initial copper concentration (Ce/Ceo) versus time.
The nature of the W/O emulsion has an important
bearing on the overall extraction performance hence it is
necessary to characterize the emulsion used. The
emulsions were characterized by measurement of
viscosity, interfacial tension and internal drop size
distribution. Brookfield cone and plate Rheometer
model (LVDV III + CP) was used to determine the
viscosity of the emulsions at different shear rates using
cone spindle CPE 52. The interfacial tensions between
the emulsion and feed solutions were measured using a
Du-Nuoy tensiometer.
The internal drop sizes of the emulsion were
measured microscopically using Olympus microscope
model BH-2 attached with an Olympus photo micrographic system model PM-10 AD at a magnification of
1500 . The emulsion was diluted with kerosene and
46
Table 1
Range of parametric variations studied
Variants Cio
(M)
Wsurf
(%, wt)
Wsurf
Cio
Cc
1
3, 4.7
1,
3
1.5, 2
1.5
3
pH
1.5
Ceo
TR
1.5
Cc
(%, v/v)
TR
Ceo
pH
(mg/L)
1:6
500
1:6
1:6
500
500
2
2
500
0.5
500
0.5
10
1, 2,
5
2
0.5
10
0.4, 0.5, 10
0.6
0.5
10
0.5
10
0.5
1:6
500,
1033,
1900
1:4, 500
1:6,
1:10
50
30
= 0.4
= 0.5
= 0.6
0.8
Ce /C eo
= 0.4
= 0.5
= 0.6
40
% Frequency
47
0.6
0.4
0.2
20
0
10
6.52
7.824
0.4
0.5
0.6
65.74
65.74
116.6
3.18
3.38
4.58
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
0.8
Ce/C eo
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
Fig. 3. Trade off between stirring speed (N) and (Wsurf = 3% wt,
Cio = 1 M, Cc = 10% v/v, pH = 2, Ceo = 500 mg/L, TR = 1:6).
48
1
Wsurf = 3 %
Wsurf = 4.7 %
C e /C eo
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
1
Cio = 1 M
Cio = 1.5 M
Cio = 2 M
0.6
0.4
0.2
Cc = 5 %
Cc = 7.5 %
Cc = 10 %
Cc = 15 %
Cc = 20 %
0.8
Ce /Ceo
Ce/C eo
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
12
49
, mN/m
10
8
6
4
2
0
10
% LIX 84
15
20
4.2.1. Effect of pH
The pH of the feed phase has profound influence on
the extraction behaviour. It is well known that ketoximes, which is the principal constituent of LIX 84, are
moderately strong copper extractants. Reported pH
isotherms of LIX 84 (Cognis MCT Redbook 1997)
suggest that copper is strongly extracted at pH 2. The
presence of small amount of salicylaldoxime in LIX 84
that are strong copper extractants even at more acidic
conditions than pH 2 does not significantly influence the
extraction performance at lower pH values as seen in
Fig. 9. At pH 1, the maximum extent of copper recovery
was just 28%, while at pH 2 and pH 5 quantitative
copper recovery were obtained, but extraction rates were
significantly larger at pH 5 in comparison with pH 2.
4.2.2. Effect of initial feed concentration (Ceo )
The effect of feed phase copper concentration is
complementary to the internal phase stripping acid
concentration. When Ceo is low, most of the solute
diffusing within the emulsion globule is stripped by the
internal stripping phase droplets, which are situated in
the peripheral regions of the emulsion globule. When
Ceo increases, the peripheral droplets get rapidly
exhausted, necessitating the solute to permeate deeper
within the globule prior to getting stripped. Therefore,
an increase in Ceo also corresponds to an increase in
diffusional path lengths.
ELMs are usually designed to operate with feed
concentrations that are generally less than 1000 mg/L.
The efficacy of ELMs to handle widely varying feed
concentrations using emulsions having the same
extraction capacities was investigated by changing the
initial feed concentration in the range of 497 mg/L to
1900 mg/L. Stripping acid concentration of 2 M was
used to formulate these emulsions and higher Cio (2 M)
120
1
0.8
80
60
38.4 (1/s)
57.6 (1/s)
76.8 (1/s)
96.0 (1/s)
115.2 (1/s)
40
20
0
10
15
% LIX 84
20
25
Ce /Ceo
, mPa.s
100
0.6
pH = 1
pH = 2
pH = 5
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
Ce /C eo
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
T R = 1:4
T R = 1:6
0.8
Ce /C eo
50
T R = 1:10
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
40
Time in minutes
50
60
Fig. 11. Effect of treat ratio (TR) on rate of copper extraction ( = 0.5,
Wsurf = 3% wt, Cio = 1.5 M, Cc = 10% v/v, pH = 2, Ceo = 500 mg/L).
10 min
30 min
40 min
50 min
60 min
% Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
0.5
1
1.5
Globule size (mm)
0.8
0.8
0.6
d 32
Ce/Ceo
0.4
0.2
0
0.6
0.4
Ce /Ceo
50
d 32 (mm)
60
51
0.2
0
20
40
60
Time in minutes
0
80
52
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank AICTE, R&D Scheme F. No.
8021/RID/NPROJ/R&D-2/2002-03 for support to carry
out this work, Indian Oil Corporation Limited for supply
of kerosene and Cognis Inc. (Ireland) for supply of
samples of LIX reagents.
References
Bart, H.J., Draxler, J., Marr, R., 1988. Residence time selection in
liquid membrane permeation for copper recovery. Hydrometallurgy 19, 351360.
Chakravarti, A.K., Chowdhury, S.B., Mukherjee, D.C., 2000. Liquid
membrane multiple emulsion process of separation of copper(II)
from wastewaters. Colloids Surf., A 166, 725.
Cognis Corporation, MCT Redbook, 1997. The Chemistry of Metals
Recovery by LIX Reagents.
Ding, X., Xie, F., 1991. Study of the swelling phenomena of liquid
surfactant membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 59, 183188.
Frankenfeld, J.W., Li, N.N., 1977. Wastewater treatment by liquid ion
exchange in liquid membrane system. In: Li, N.N. (Ed.), Recent
Developments in Separation Science, vol. 3. CRC Press Inc.,
Cleveland Ohio, pp. 285292.
Frankenfeld, J.W., Cahn, R.P., Li, N.N., 1981. Extraction of copper by
liquid membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 16 (4), 385402.
Gu, Z., Ho, W.S., Li, N.N., 1992. Design considerations. In: Ho, W.S.,
Sirkar, K.K. (Eds.), Membrane Handbook. Chapman and Hall,
New York, pp. 657700.
Jena, K.N., Sarma, P.V.R.B., Das, S.C., Misra, V.N., 2002. Extraction
of copper from sulfate solutions using LIX 84 I. In: Misra, V.N.,
Das, S.C., Rao, K.S. (Eds.), Proceedings International Symposium
on Solvent Extraction. Allied Publishers, Mumbai, pp. 2733.
Kitagawa, T., Nishikawa, Y., Frankenfeld, J.W., Li, N.N., 1977.
Wastewater treatment by liquid membrane process. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 11 (6), 602605.
Kordosky, G.A., 2000. Copper solvent extraction reagents past present
and future. Presented at Expomin 2000, International Conference
on Clean Technologies for the Mining Industry, May 913,
Santiago, Chile.
Lee, K.H., Evans, D.F., Cussler, E.L., 1978. Selective copper recovery
with two types of liquid membranes. AIChE Journal 24 (5),
860868.
Li, N.N., 1968. Separating hydrocarbons with liquid membranes. U.S.
Patent 3,410,794.
Marr, R., Kopp, A., 1982. Liquid membrane technologya survey of
phenomena, mechanisms, and models. Int. Chem. Eng. 22 (1),
4460.
Martin, T.P., Davies, G.A., 1977. The extraction of copper from dilute
aqueous solutions using a liquid membrane process. Hydrometallurgy 2, 315334.
Merigold, C.R., 1996. LIX Reagent solvent extraction plant
operating manual for small and medium size leach-solvent
extractionelectrowinning copper recovery operations, Second
edition. Henkel Corporation, Minerals Industry Division, Tucson,
USA.
Mikucki, B.A., Osseo-Asare, K., 1986. The liquid surfactant
membrane process: effect of the emulsifier type on copper
extraction by LIX65 NLIX 63 mixtures. Hydrometallurgy 16,
209229.
53
Teramoto, M., Sakai, T., Yanagawa, K., Oshuga, M., Miyake, Y., 1983.
Modeling of the permeation of copper through liquid surfactant
membranes. Sep. Sci. and Technol. 18 (8), 735764.
Volkel, W., Halwachs, W., Schugerl, K., 1980. Copper extraction by
means of a liquid surfactant membrane process. J. Membr. Sci. 6,
1931.
Whewell, R.J., Hanson, C., 1981. Metal extraction with hydroximes.
Ion Exchange and Solvent Extraction, vol. 8. Marcell Dekker, Inc.,
New York, pp. 193.
Wright, J.B., Nilsen, D.N., Hundley, G., Galvan, G.J., 1995. Field test
for liquid emulsion membrane technique for copper recovery from
mine solutions. Miner. Eng. 8 (4/5), 549556.