Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTODUCTION
Hypothesis
Load shape becomes more rounded and size becomes smaller with distance
from the source this is because the rocks nearer the mouth have been
exposed to more attrition and abrasion then the other rocks nearer the
source
The cross profile gradient is steeper nearer the source because vertical
erosion has occurred more often
The channel width widens further down the river long profile this is because
of vertical and lateral erosion. Vertical erosion leads to the development of
steep sided and narrow valleys while lateral erosion (which occurs nearer
the mouth) makes a wide channel.
METHOD
1. Calculating Load Shape Data
To determine the common characteristics of loads from the different sections we
had to use the following equipment.
Caliper- measure the length of a stones
Scale- to measure the rocks in grams
Plastic Bag- A stone was placed inside the bag to calculate the weight
Quadrat- The quadrat was made using 4X 1m rulers. We placed it at
random location and we randomly picked 10 rocks from inside the
quadrat.
We collected 10 stones from the quadrat using random sampling, two people from
the group closed their eyes while picking the stones, we found that this was the best
method to use because it avoids bias. Once we calculated the weight and length of
the stones we determined its shape using the Powells Index of roundness.
2. Measuring channel width and gradient
In this part of the fieldwork our group measured the channel width and gradient of
3 different sections of the river; the upper, middle, and lower course. We measured
the width be using a tape measure and measuring the width between to ranging
poles. We then used a clinometer to measure the angle between the two ranging
poles. The equipment helped us to investigate out hypothesis about the cross profile
gradient.
Weight
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
Average Width of
stones/cm
10
Weight
Upper
course
Middle Lower
Course Course
5
width
0
Upper
course
Middle
Course
Lower
Course
Our results show that the upper course of the river contains the lightest rocks while
the lower course contains the heaviest rocks. The results also show that the upper
course contains the largest rocks in terms of width, while the lower course contains
the smallest. In reality the source will have the largest width, this fact proves that
our sampling technique had a negative effect on our results since in reality the mean
weight was in correct but the width was correct.