Professional Documents
Culture Documents
32(2004): 161-177
Bonn Aure
162
163
164
environment and its spirits, the power of myths, and so forth). If we consider ritual as religion in action and that it is ritual which accomplishes
what religion sets out to do (Wallace 1966: 102), the operation of belief
systems can therefore be scientifically investigated in archaeology, with
ritual deposits seen as the material realities of religion and ritual behavior
capable of forming a depositional context. Walker goes on to argue that
violent death as manifested in mortuary evidence need not be attributed
only to warfare but may also be caused by ritual violence.
The partiality of New Archaeology towards politico-economic inferences leads to all traces of violent death being interpreted, almost automatically, as caused by warfare. But there is a greater richness to much
archaeological data which cannot always be satisfactorily subject to inferences of a politico-economic character, such as attributions of warfare.
Walker (1998) argued that some of the American Southwest archaeological cases earlier interpreted as products of warfare are in fact due to activities related to religion and ritual.
Indeed, warfare has been well documented historically as a cause
of death, but so have religious and ritual-related violence in various historic and prehistoric societies. For example, Lieban (1960: 133) wrote open
acts of violence against those suspected of sorcery (and witchcraft) have
been well-known for some human groups. In many interpretive cases now
considered closed, or almost closed, ritual and religion have probably been
more significant causal factors of how those archaeological deposits were
structured than has been recognized. This is not to completely play down
other causal factors thought to have been at work in their sites by Philippine archaeologists, but rather to argue for a need to be more open to religion and ritual as alternative frames of reference in forming
archaeological inferences.
Warfare, Slave-raiding, and the Tanjay Mass Grave
Laura Lee Junkers (1999b) book, Raiding, Trading and Feasting:
The Political Economy of Philippine Chiefdoms, stands out as the most
comprehensive work dealing with Philippine prehistory. The book offers a
comprehensive interpretative understanding of Philippine prehistoric and
protohistoric societies using a politico-economic framework. She draws
her conclusions from a wide array of archaeological and ethnohistorical
data to illustrate the dynamics of Philippine chiefdoms vis--vis other
kinds of polities. Prior to Junkers book, archaeological inferences on Phil-
165
166
167
The mortuary evidences from the two burial sites indicate the significance of warfare in the formation of paramount chieftaincies in the
Philippines (Junker 1999b: 368, 1993a: 71). However, this inference begs
some questions. Although warfare may have been prevalent in the twelfth
to sixteenth century societies of the Tanjay region, was it the sole causal
factor of violent deaths during that period? Even if the warriors grave is
a plausible evidence for warfare, can we also infer that the multiple deaths
(i.e. mass grave) were also caused by warfare? Are the patterns in the
depositional contexts of the two burial sites (i.e. mass grave and warriors grave) regular enough to warrant the warfare thesis?
By invoking artifactual multivocality, this paper attempts to argue
for an alternative interpretation of the Tanjay mass grave, beyond the warfare and chiefdom thesis. The inherent archaeological limitation of this
paper, however, is its reliance on secondary data, taken from Junkers publications.
We concur with Junker that the reason for the mass grave was
probably an unusual death event. However, inferential gaps seem to be
present in the warfare and raiding thesis as a plausible cause of the multiple deaths. If slaves were so important in the Tanjay chiefdom, why did
the mass killings happen rather than enslavement of the victims? Junker
(1999a: 31) remarked that the accumulation of more slaves increased
overall agricultural productivity, supported an expanding military force for
continued slave-raiding, allowed chiefs to devote more of their labor to
maritime trading activities, and generally expanded the politically manipulable surplus under a chiefs control. She extricated herself from this dilemma by coming to the conclusion that the mass grave was the result of
a devastating raid (1999a: 29) brought about by interpolity warfare.
While warfare is well represented in the ethnographic record, I
would argue that a rigid fixation on warfare and raiding tend to constrict
analysis and may result in the misrepresentation of the archaeological
record. Although warfare was prevalent, as suggested from historical accounts of various Spanish chroniclers, the mass grave does not seem to be
caused by warfare. At the outset, the presence of a cranial trauma, a misaligned vertebral column, and skull accompaniments might lead one to infer that indeed war was the cause of death. This seems to be
commonsensical and later on believable as historical accounts are injected
168
169
170
Violent death is not the monopoly of warfare. Other causal dimensions of violent death are found in historic accounts. Persecution of suspected witches has been documented as a cause for violent death in many
societies. For the Philippines, Anima noted that witchcrafthas a long,
continuous history of persecution for its practitioners. Witch-suspects
were often subjected to drowning tests to determine the validity of the
witch-hunters suspicions (Anima 1978: 2).
One lynching incident in Carigara, Leyte, as recounted by Ramos,
illustrates one community reaction to those suspected of witchcraft.
Han olitawo pa ako may-ada wakwak didto ha Cogon an ngaran he
Mara. Damo an nasering nga hi Mara in para wakwak han mga bag-o
nga anakan didto hadto nga lugar. Usa ka adlaw may ada bag-o nga
anakan nga namatay kay guin wakwak kono ni Mara. Guinhigot ha
barsa ngan iguin pasaog han carabao hasta nga namatay. An mga taga
baryo diri na kontento salet era guin labay ngadto ha lunayan han
kabao
When I was still single there was a wakwak in Cogon whose name was
Mara. Many said that Mara was the cause of the death of many mothers
who had newly given birth there. One day a mother had been
wakwaked by Mara (her blood sucked out). The barrio folks went to the
house of Mara and tied him and mounted his body on [or behind?] a
sled and had a carabao pull him over rocky ground. The barrio people
were not yet content so they dumped him into the mud where the carabaos wallowed (Ramos 1971: 56-57).
Another incident was recorded by Lieban (1960: 133) where violence was perpetrated against those suspected of sorcery. He said that a
man suspected of sorcery was shot at in a community near Sibulan and,
in the course of his study, a newspaper reported that a woman suspected
of performing sorcery had been killed and her husband and children injured when men threw a homemade explosive into her house because she
was believed to have caused the illness of a son of one of the men.
171
172
173
put to a ritual use that was not associated with warfare at all. Skulls perhaps were central in the mortuary rituals in the Tanjay polity during that
period (as expressed in the warriors grave and the mass grave). But
the reworked skull (with two long bones forming an X) suggests a special
and specific symbol meaningful to the surviving community. Without these remains having been arranged as they were, the mass grave would have
been culturally sterile.
Therefore, I suggest that the human remains in the Tanjay mass
burial are possibly of two kinds: (a) those of a kin group of persecuted and
slain witches, and (b) extra skulls of warriors taken in previous battles
which were placed in the mass grave to ward off (or weigh down) aswang
returning from the dead. In this interpretation, the skull accompaniments
were ritual objects, and not the heads of slaves sacrificed to accompany
their masters in death. This use of skulls could have been related to what
in rural Cebuan culture today is called pangontra or sumpa, countersorcery or counter-witchcraft to ward off or exorcise the aswang. Related
to this is Liebans observation that the skull of a deceased, unbaptized person could be used ritually by a sorceror to cause someones death (Lieban
1960: 129-130), a curse called in Cebuano paktol. Another way of warding off witches, observed ethnographically, could have been in use in prehispanic times, namely the tattooing of certain formulae on a vulnerable
persons body (Scheans and Hutterer 1970: 29). In the Tanjay mass grave,
the reworked skull with the long bones in an X (hex?) formation, and one
of them inserted through an eye socket, may have been another way to repel the return of the deceased witches, possibly by blinding one of them.
Conclusion
Archaeologists have often used ethnographic analogy to substantiate their conceptual framework in the analysis of the archaeological record. How the archaeologist interprets the depositional context largely
depends on the conceptual lens he or she uses; for example, processualists
tend to privilege politico-economic analysis. The danger, however, is that
these conceptual frameworks may misrepresent the peoples and communities that the archaeologist studies. Consequently, other dimensions of human experience are left unexplored and the richness of prehistory
expunged from the archaeologists texts. The stories of the prehispanic
native Filipinos went beyond wars and slavery and these other stories are
worth listening to as well.
174
Acknowledgments
The writing of this paper would not have been possible without the
generous support and encouragement of colleagues and friends. First and
foremost, I would like to thank the University of San Carlos-New Mexico
State University Fulbright Education Partnership Project for enhancing
anthropological studies at the University of San Carlos. I also owe a special debt of gratitude to Harold Olofson for his assistance on this paper;
William H. Walker -- a fellow Joyce Wellian -- for his theoretical guidance and friendship; Wenda Trevathan who gave me her steady support
and encouragement; and John A. Peterson for reviewing the contents of
this paper.
REFERENCES CITED
Anima, Nid
1978
175
Flannery, Kent V.
1967
Culture History vs. Cultural Process: A Debate in American Archaeology, Scientific American 217(2): 119-122.
Gomez, Carla
2003
Archaeological Excavations at the Late First Millenium and Early Second Millenium A.D. Settlement of Tanjay, Negros Oriental: Household Organization, Chiefly Production and Social Ranking, Philippine
Quarterly of Culture & Society 21(2): 146-225.
1999a
1999b
Lieban, Richard W.
1960
Sorcery, Illness, and Social Control in a Philippine Municipality,
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 16(2): 127-143.
1967
Maceda, Marcelino N.
1977
Preliminary Report on the Excavation at Fort San Pedro, in Cebu City,
Philippines, Fu Jen Studies 45-59.
Mijares, Armand Salvador B., Sheldon Clyde B. Jago-on and Marie Grace
Pamela G. Faylona
2003
In Search of Prehispanic Itbayaten Settlements, Philippine Quarterly
of Culture & Society 31(1/2): 26-45.
Nishimura, Masao
1988
Long Distance Trade and the Development of Complex Societies in
the Prehistory of the Philippines the Cebu Archaeological Project:
Basic Concept and First Results, Philippine Quarterly of Culture &
176
Villegas, Maria G.
1968
Superstitious Beliefs and Practices in the Coastal Towns of Eastern
Leyte, Leyte-Samar Studies 2(2): 221-223.
Walker, William H.
1995
Ceremonial Trash? in Skibo, James M., William H. Walker, and Axel
E. Nielsen (eds.), Expanding Archaeology, pp. 67-79. Salt Lake City:
University of Utah Press.
1998
2002
177
Wallace, A. F. C.
1966
Religion: An Anthropological Review. New York: Random House.