Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AbstractThis paper presents a unified control strategy that enables both islanded and grid-tied operations of three-phase inverter
in distributed generation, with no need for switching between two
corresponding controllers or critical islanding detection. The proposed control strategy composes of an inner inductor current loop,
and a novel voltage loop in the synchronous reference frame. The
inverter is regulated as a current source just by the inner inductor current loop in grid-tied operation, and the voltage controller
is automatically activated to regulate the load voltage upon the
occurrence of islanding. Furthermore, the waveforms of the grid
current in the grid-tied mode and the load voltage in the islanding
mode are distorted under nonlinear local load with the conventional strategy. And this issue is addressed by proposing a unified
load current feedforward in this paper. Additionally, this paper
presents the detailed analysis and the parameter design of the
control strategy. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed control
strategy is validated by the simulation and experimental results.
Index TermsDistributed generation (DG), islanding, load current, seamless transfer, three-phase inverter, unified control.
I. INTRODUCTION
ISTRIBUTED generation (DG) is emerging as a viable
alternative when renewable or nonconventional energy
resources are available, such as wind turbines, photovoltaic arrays, fuel cells, microturbines [1], [3]. Most of these resources
are connected to the utility through power electronic interfacing
converters, i.e., three-phase inverter. Moreover, DG is a suitable
form to offer high reliable electrical power supply, as it is able to
operate either in the grid-tied mode or in the islanded mode [2].
In the grid-tied operation, DG deliveries power to the utility
and the local critical load. Upon the occurrence of utility outage,
the islanding is formed. Under this circumstance, the DG must
be tripped and cease to energize the portion of utility as soon as
possible according to IEEE Standard 929-2000 [4]. However,
in order to improve the power reliability of some local critical
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Fig. 1.
1177
1178
Fig. 2.
B. Basic Idea
With the hybrid voltage and current mode control [17][40],
the inverter is controlled as a current source to generate the
reference power PDG + jQDG in the grid-tied mode. And its
output power PDG + jQDG should be the sum of the power
injected to the grid Pg + jQg and the load demand Pload +
jQload , which can be expressed as follows by assuming that the
load is represented as a parallel RLC circuit:
3 Vm2
2 R
1
3
C .
= Vm2
2
L
Pload =
(1)
Qload
(2)
In (1) and (2), Vm and represent the amplitude and frequency of the load voltage, respectively. When the nonlinear
local load is fed, it can still be equivalent to the parallel RLC
circuit by just taking account of the fundamental component.
During the time interval from the instant of islanding happening to the moment of switching the control system to voltage
mode control, the load voltage is neither fixed by the utility nor
regulated by the inverter, so the load voltage may drift from
the normal range [6]. And this phenomenon can be explained
as below by the power relationship. During this time interval,
the inverter is still controlled as a current source, and its output
power is kept almost unchanged. However, the power injected to
utility decreases to zero rapidly, and then the power consumed
by the load will be imposed to the output power of DG. If both
active power Pg and reactive power Qg injected into the grid are
positive in the grid-tied mode, then Pload and Qload will increase
after the islanding happens, and the amplitude and frequency of
the load voltage will rise and drop, respectively, according to
(1) and (2).
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Fig. 3.
1179
A. Grid-Tied Mode
When the utility is normal, the DG is controlled as a current
source to supply given active and reactive power by the inductor
current loop, and the active and reactive power can be given
by the current reference of D- and Q-axis independently. First,
the phase angle of the utility voltage is obtained by the PLL,
which consists of a Park transformation expressed by (3), a PI
1180
2
cos
cos
3
xd
2
=
3
xq
2
sin sin
3
xa
xb .
xc
2
cos +
3
2
sin +
3
(3)
Second, the filter inductor current, which has been transformed into SRF by the Park transformation, is fed back and
compared with the inductor current reference iL r ef dq , and the
inductor current is regulated to track the reference iL r ef dq by
the PI compensator GI .
The reference of the inductor current loop iL r ef dq seems
complex and it is explained as below. It is assumed that the utility
is stiff, and the three-phase utility voltage can be expressed as
vg a = Vg cos
vg b = Vg cos
(4)
3
vg c = Vg cos +
3
where Vg is the magnitude of the grid voltage, and is the actual
phase angle. By the Park transformation, the utility voltage is
transformed into the SRF, which is shown as
vg d = Vg cos( )
(5)
vg q = Vg sin( ).
vg q is regulated to zero by the PLL, so vg d equals the magnitude of the utility voltage Vg . As the filter capacitor voltage
equals the utility voltage in the gird-tied mode, vC d equals the
magnitude of the utility voltage Vg , and vC q equals zero, too.
In the D-axis, the inductor current reference iL r ef d can be
expressed by (6) according to Fig. 3
iL r ef d = Ig r ef d + iL L d 0 Cf vC q .
(6)
(7)
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Fig. 5. Operation sequence during the transition from the grid-tied mode to
the islanded mode.
Fig. 6. Transient process of the voltage and current when the islanding
happens.
= Rs + jXs .
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
vC q = iL L q Rs + iL L d Xs .
(12)
1181
1182
iod = iL d iC d = Ig r ef d (0 ) Cf vC q + iL L d
ioq = iL q iC q = vC q kG v q + Ig r ef q
+ (0 ) Cf vC q + iL L q .
(15)
As angle frequency is very close to the rated angle frequency 0 , the output current iodq can be simplified as
iod = Ig r ef d + iL L d
(16)
ioq = vC q kG v q + Ig r ef q + iL L q .
It can be found that the output current follows Ig r ef dq and the
load current iL L dq , as vC q equals zero in the grid-tied mode. The
active and reactive power injected into utility can be obtained
as follows. Consequently, the active power and reactive power
flowing from the inverter to utility can be given by Ig r ef d and
Ig r ef q , respectively
= 2 vC d Ig r ef d
(17)
= vC d Ig r ef q .
2
In the islanded mode, the inverter is controlled as a voltage source by the external voltage loop. In the D-axis, vC d is
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
(18)
(19)
Ig r ef q
.
kG v q
1183
Vm ax = 1.1 2 Vn
(23)
where Vn represents the RMS value of the rated phase voltage.
In order to guarantee that the PLL operates normally in the
grid-tied mode, the utility angle frequency should not touch
the upper value m ax or lower value m in of the limier in the
PLL. Besides, the angle frequency is restricted between m ax
and m in in the islanded mode, and it should not drift from
the normal value too far. So, m ax and m in are selected as
the maximum and minimum angle frequencies allowed by the
utility standard.
B. Transient State
(20)
m in , Ig r ef q > 0
= g 0 ,
(22)
Ig r ef q = 0
m ax , Ig r ef q < 0.
2) Selection of References and Limiters: In the grid-tied
mode, the active power injected into the grid Pg is given by
the current reference Ig r ef d , and it is the upper value of the
limiter in D-axis. Therefore, the selection of Ig r ef d depends on
the power rating of the inverter. For the current reference Ig r ef q ,
firstly it determines the reactive power injected into utility Qg in
the grid-tied mode according to (17), and then it also affects the
magnitude of the load voltage in the islanded mode according
to (21). As a result, the reactive power Qg cannot be very large,
in order to make the magnitude of the load voltage within the
normal range in the islanded mode.
In the grid-tied mode, Vm ax should be larger than the magnitude of the utility voltage Vg . At the same time, the load voltage
is determined by Vm ax in the islanded mode by (21), so Vm ax
should not be much larger than Vg . Therefore, it is selected as
1) Small-Signal Model of the Power Stage: Before the compensators in the voltage and current loops are designed and the
transient performance is analyzed, the three-phase inverter in the
DG needs to be modeled. According to the power stage shown
in Fig. 1, the dc-link voltage Vdc is regulated by the front-end
converter in DG. Then, it is assumed that the dc voltage Vdc is
very stiff, and its dynamic is not concerned in this paper. Therefore, the average model of the power stage can be described
by
da
iL a
iL a
vC a
d
Vdc
db = Lf
iL b + Rl iL b + vC b
2
dt
dc
iL c
iL c
vC c
(24)
iL a
vC a
iL L a
ig a
d
iL b = Cf
vC b + iL L b + ig b . (25)
dt
iL c
vC c
iL L c
ig c
In (24), da , db , and dc are the average duty cycle of each leg
varying from 1 to 1, and Rl represents the equivalent series
resistance of the filter inductor. Then, the average model in the
SRF can obtained with the Park transformation shown in (3),
which is represented by
dd
iL d
0
Lf
d iL d
Vdc
= Lf
+
2
dt iL q
dq
Lf
0
iL q
iL d
vC d
+ Rl
+
(26)
iL q
vC q
vC d
0
Cf
iL d
d vC d
= Cf
+
dt vC q
iL q
Cf
0
vC q
iL L d
ig d
+
+
.
(27)
iL L q
ig q
With the stiff dc voltage Vdc , the small-signal model will be
the same as the average model. Then, it can be found that there
are couplings introduced by the inductor Lf and capacitors Cf
between D and Q-axes in the SRF, and these couplings can
be mitigated by the decoupling components 0 Lf /kPW M and
1184
TABLE I
PARAMETERS OF THE POWER STAGE
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Vdc
d
2 d = Lf dt iL + Rl iL + vC
(28)
iL = Cf d vC + iL L + ig .
dt
2) Design and Analysis of the Current Loop: The inductor
current loop should operate normally to regulate the inductor
current loop in both islanded and grid-tied modes. In the islanded
mode, the small-signal model of the control-to-current can be
obtained according to (28), which is shown as
Gid1 (s) =
iL (s)
sCf
Vdc
2
.
=
2 s Lf Cf + sRl Cf + 1
d(s)
(29)
iL (s)
1
Vdc
=
.
2 sLf + Rl
d(s)
(30)
1+
s
G i
(31)
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Fig. 11.
Bode plot of the loop gain of the voltage loop in D- and Q-axes.
1185
Fig. 12. Bode plot of the output impedance with and without the load current
feedforward, when DG operates in the islanded mode.
1+
Gv q (s) = kG v q .
s
G v d
(32)
(33)
vC (s)
Gv i (s) [1 Gic (s)]
(34)
=
iL L (s)
1 + Gv (s) Gic (s) Gv i (s)
vC (s)
Gv i (s)
Zo2 (s) =
. (35)
=
iL L (s)
1 + Gv (s) Gic (s) Gv i (s)
Comparing (34) and (35), it can be found that an extra factor
[1 Gic (s)] appears in the output impedance with load current
feedforward, and the magnitude of the output impedance will
be reduced in the low frequency range because the gain of
the closed-loop transfer function Gic (s) closes to unity in the
bandwidth of the current loop. The Bode plot of the output
impedance of these two conditions is shown in Fig. 12, and
it can be seen that the magnitude of the output impedance is
reduced from dc to 600 Hz with the load current feedforward.
Consequently, the quality of the load voltage vC abc will be
improved with the load current feedforward.
In the grid-tied mode, the inductor current is regulated by the
inductor current loop directly, and the inductor current reference
is mainly composed by the current reference Ig r ef dq , and the
load current iL L dq . If the load current is not fed forward, the
output current iodq of the inverter will be fixed by Ig r ef dq . As a
result, the disturbance of the load current will be fully injected
into the utility, and this can be represented by
ig (s)
= 1.
iL L (s)
(36)
Fig. 13. Bode plot of the transfer function from load current to grid current
with and without the load current feedforward, when DG operates in the grid-tied
mode.
(37)
1186
TABLE II
PARAMETERS IN THE CONTROL SYSTEM
is 50 Hz, and the upper and the lower values of the limiter in
the PLL are given as 0.2 Hz higher and lower than the rated
frequency, respectively.
In the grid-tied mode, the dynamic performance of the conventional voltage mode control and the proposed unified control
strategy is compared by stepping down the grid current reference from 9 A to 5 A. The simulation result of the voltage
mode control is shown in Fig. 14(a), and the current reference is
changed at the moment of 14 s. It is found that dynamic process
lasts until around 15.2 s. In the proposed unified control strategy,
the simulation result is represented in Fig. 14(b) and the time
interval of the dynamic process is less than 5 ms. Comparing
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Fig. 16.
1187
B. Experimental Results
To verify the proposed control strategy, an experimental prototype of DG has been established, which is shown in Fig. 16.
The utility for the DG is emulated by a three-phase transformer
and a voltage regulator connected with the actual utility. The
rated line voltage of the actual utility is 380 V. The emulated
utility is called as utility in the below. Moreover, the inverter
in the DG is fed by a three-phase diode rectifier, and the
dc-bus voltage is set to 400 V approximately by the voltage
1188
Fig. 20. Experimental waveforms when DG is transferred from the islanded mode to the grid-tied mode: CH1, grid voltage vg a , 100 V/div; CH2, load voltage
v C a , 100 V/div; CH3, grid current ig a , 10 A/div; CH4, inductor current iL a , 10 A/div.
regulator. Besides, the control system is implemented fully digitally by digital signal processor TMS320F28335 from Texas
Instruments. The parameters in the experimental DG, shown in
Tables I and II, are identical to the ones used in the simulation.
Fig. 17 shows the experimental waveforms when DG is in
the islanded mode, and it can be seen that the magnitude of the
load voltage equals 180 V approximately, and the total harmonic
distortion (THD) of the load voltage is 0.9%.
Fig. 18 shows the experimental waveforms when DG is in the
grid-tied mode. The magnitude of the grid current is closed to
9 A, and the THD of the grid current is 3.6% approximately.
When the DG is transferred from the grid-tied mode to the
islanded mode, the experimental results with the traditional hybrid voltage and current mode control and the proposed unified
control strategy are given in Fig. 19. Before the islanding happens, the magnitude of the load voltage is around 163 V. The
current injected into the utility ig a is in phase with the utility
voltage, and the magnitude of ig a is approximately 9 A. When
the switch Su opens, the islanding happens, and the grid current
ig a drops to zero. In the traditional hybrid voltage and current
mode control, it can be found that the load voltage is seriously
distorted upon the occurrence of islanding. And this condition
lasts until the islanding is confirmed by DG and the control
structure is changed to regulate the load voltage. However, with
the proposed unified control strategy, the distortion of the load
voltage is obviously improved, and the magnitude of the load
voltage increases slightly and is close to 180 V.
Fig. 20 shows the process when DG is transferred from the islanded mode to the grid-tied mode. From 0 ms to around 300 ms,
the phase of the load voltage is regulated to resynchronize with
the utility voltage, and the phase difference is reduced gradually.
Then, the magnitude of the load voltage is regulated to equal
the utility voltage. At the moment of 350 ms, the switch Si is
turned on, and the current injected into the grid ig a increases
smoothly without huge inrush current, and the load voltage is
stable during the transition.
Fig. 21 shows the experimental waveforms when DG feeds
nonlinear load in the islanded mode. It can be seen that the
distortion of the load voltage is improved by the load current
feedforward, and the THD of the load voltage is reduced from
4.7% to 3.2%.
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
1189
Fig. 22. Variation of the THD of the load voltage with the power of the
nonlinear load when DG is in the islanded mode.
Fig. 24. Variation of the THD of the grid current when DG is in the grid-tied
mode with (a) the power of the nonlinear load, and (b) the amplitude of the grid
current.
Fig. 23. Experimental waveforms when DG feeds nonlinear load in the gridtied mode (a) with load current feedforward and (b) without load current feedforward: CH1, inductor current iL a , 10 A/div; CH2, load current iL L a , 5 A/div;
CH3, grid voltage v g a , 100 V/div; CH4, grid current ig a , 10 A/div.
1190
[21] S. Jung, Y. Bae, S. Choi, and H. Kim, A low cost utility interactive inverter
for residential fuel cell generation, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22,
no. 6, pp. 22932298, Nov. 2007.
[22] R. Majumder, A. Ghosh, G. Ledwich, and F. Zare, Control of parallel
converters for load sharing with seamless transfer between grid connected
and islanded modes, in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008, pp. 17.
[23] H. Tao, J. L. Duarte, and M. A. M. Hendrix, Line-interactive UPS using
a fuel cell as the primary source, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55,
no. 8, pp. 30123021, Aug. 2008.
[24] D. N. Gaonkar, G. N. Pillai, and R. N. Patel, Seamless transfer of microturbine generation system operation between grid-connected and islanding
modes, Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 174188, Jan.
2009.
[25] N. Reza, G. Gevorg, A. Mehrdad, and M. Mishel, Grid-tied and standalone operation of distributed generation modules aggregated by cascaded
boost converters, J. Power Electron., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97105, Jan. 2010.
[26] G. M. S. Azevedo, F. Bradaschia, M. C. Cavalcanti, F. A. S. Neves,
J. Rocabert, and P. Rodriguez, Safe transient operation of microgrids
based on master-slave configuration, in Proc. 3rd IEEE Energy Convers.
Congr. Expo., Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2011, pp. 21912195.
[27] I. J. Balaguer, Q. Lei, S. Yang, U. Supatti, and F. Z. Peng, Control for
grid-connected and intentional islanding operations of distributed power
generation, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 147157, Jan.
2011.
[28] S.-M. Lee, K.-N. Sung, T.-K. Lee, and W.-C. Lee, UPS/APF power
conversion equipment with a seamless mode transfer, in Proc. 8th IEEE
Int. Conf. Power Electron., Jeju, Korea, 2011, pp. 27692776.
[29] M. Ranjbar, H. Ebrahimirad, S. Mohaghegh, and A. Ghaleh, Seamless
transfer of three-phase grid-interactive microturbine inverter between gridconnected and stand-alone modes, in Proc. 19th Iranian Conf. Electr.
Eng., Tehran, Iran, 2011, pp. 16.
[30] T.-S. Hwang and S.-Y. Park, A seamless control strategy of distributed
generation inverter for critical load safety under strict grid disturbance, in
Proc. 27th IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Orlando, FL, USA,
2012, pp. 254261.
[31] F.-S. Pai, An improved utility interface for microturbine generation system with stand-alone operation capabilities, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 15291537, Oct. 2006.
[32] F.-S. Pai and S.-J. Huang, Design and operation of power converter
for microturbine powered distributed generator with capacity expansion
capability, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 110118,
Mar. 2008.
[33] D. Dong, T. Thacker, R. Burgos, D. Boroyevich, F. Wang, and B. Giewont,
Control design and experimental verification of a multi-function singlephase bidirectional PWM converter for renewable energy systems, in
Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Power Electron. Appl., Barcelona, Spain, 2009,
pp. 110.
[34] D. Dong, T. Thacker, I. Cvetkovic, R. Burgos, D. Boroyevich, F. F. Wang,
and G. Skutt, Modes of operation and system-level control of singlephase bidirectional PWM converter for microgrid systems, IEEE Trans.
Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93104, Mar. 2012.
[35] G. Shen, D. Xu, and D. Xi, Novel seamless transfer strategies for fuel
cell inverters from grid-tied mode to off-grid mode, in Proc. 20th IEEE
Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Austin, TX, USA, 2005, pp. 109113.
[36] G. Shen, D. Xu, and X. Yuan, A novel seamless transfer control strategy
based on voltage amplitude regulation for utility-interconnected fuel cell
inverters with an LCL-filter, in Proc. 37th IEEE Power Electron. Spec.
Conf., Jeju, Korea, 2006, pp. 16.
[37] G. Shen, D. Xu, and X. Yuan, Instantaneous voltage regulated seamless
transfer control strategy for utility-interconnected fuel cell inverters with
an LCL-filter, in Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Power Electron. Motion Control
Conf., Shanghai, China, 2006, pp. 15.
[38] S. Huang, L. Kong, and H. Xu, Control algorithm research on seamless
transfer for distributed resource with a LCL filter, in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf.
Electr. Utility DRPT, Nanjing, China, 2008, pp. 28102814.
[39] Q. Lei, S. Yang, and F. Peng, Multi-loop control algorithms for seamless
transition of grid-connected inverter, in Proc. 25th IEEE Appl. Power
Electron. Conf. Expo., Palm Springs, CA, USA, 2010, pp. 844848.
[40] J.-H. Jung, E.-C. Nho, I.-D. Kim, H.-G. Kim, T.-W. Chun, and N.-S. Choi,
Seamless control mode transfer of a PCS for islanding mode operation,
in Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron., Jeju, Korea, 2011, pp. 2658
2662.
[41] M. Cirrincione, M. Pucci, and G. Vitale, A single-phase DG generation
unit with shunt active power filter capability by adaptive neural filtering,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 20932110, May 2008.
REFERENCES
[1] R. C. Dugan and T. E. McDermott, Distributed generation, IEEE Ind.
Appl. Mag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1925, Mar./Apr. 2002.
[2] R. H. Lasseter, Microgrids and distributed generation, J. Energy Eng.,
vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 144149, Sep. 2007.
[3] C. Mozina, Impact of green power distributed generation, IEEE Ind.
Appl. Mag., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5562, Jul./Aug. 2010.
[4] IEEE Recommended Practice for Utility Interface of Photovoltaic(PV)
Systems, IEEE Standard 929-2000, 2000.
[5] IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric
Power Systems, IEEE Standard 1547-2003, 2003.
[6] J. Stevens, R. Bonn, J. Ginn, and S. Gonzalez, Development and Testing
of an Approach to Anti-Islanding in Utility-Interconnected Photovoltaic
Systems. Livermore, CA, USA: Sandia National Laboratories, 2000.
[7] A. M. Massoud, K. H. Ahmed, S. J. Finney, and B. W. Williams, Harmonic distortion-based island detection technique for inverter-based distributed generation, IET Renewable Power Gener., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 493
507, Dec. 2009.
[8] T. Thacker, R. Burgos, F. Wang, and D. Boroyevich, Single-phase islanding detection based on phase-locked loop stability, in Proc. 1st IEEE
Energy Convers. Congr. Expo., San Jose, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 33713377.
[9] S.-K. Kim, J.-H. Jeon, J.-B. Ahn, B. Lee, and S.-H. Kwon, Frequencyshift acceleration control for anti-islanding of a distributed-generation
inverter, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 494504, Feb.
2010.
[10] A. Yafaoui, B. Wu, and S. Kouro, Improved active frequency drift antiislanding detection method for grid connected photovoltaic systems,
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 23672375, May 2012.
[11] J. M. Guerrero, L. Hang, and J. Uceda, Control of distributed uninterruptible power supply systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 8,
pp. 28452859, Aug. 2008.
[12] M. C. Chandorkar, D. M. Divan, and R. Adapa, Control of parallel connected inverters in standalone AC supply systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.,
vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 136143, Jan./Feb. 1993.
[13] Y. Li, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, and P. C. Loh, Design, analysis, and realtime testing of a controller for multibus microgrid system, IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 11951204, Sep. 2004.
[14] F. Gao and M. R. Iravani, A control strategy for a distributed generation
unit in grid-connected and autonomous modes of operation, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 850859, Apr. 2008.
[15] S.-H. Hu, C.-Y. Kuo, T.-L. Lee, and J. M. Guerrero, Droop-controlled
inverters with seamless transition between islanding and grid-connected
operations, in Proc. 3rd IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo., Phoenix,
AZ, USA, 2011, pp. 21962201.
[16] L. Arnedo, S. Dwari, V. Blasko, and S. Park, 80 kW hybrid solar inverter for standalone and grid connected applications, in Proc. 27th IEEE
Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Orlando, FL, USA, 2012, pp. 270
276.
[17] R. Tirumala, N. Mohan, and C. Henze, Seamless transfer of gridconnected PWM inverters between utility-interactive and stand-alone
modes, in Proc. 17th IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Dallas,
TX, USA, 2002, pp. 10811086.
[18] R. Teodorescu and F. Blaabjerg, Flexible control of small wind turbines
with grid failure detection operating in stand-alone and grid-connected
mode, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 13231332, Sep.
2004.
[19] H. Zeineldin, M. I. Marei, E. F. El-Saadany, and M. M. A. Salama, Safe
controlled islanding of inverter based distributed generation, in Proc. 35th
IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., Aachen, Germany, 2004, pp. 2515
2520.
[20] H. Zeineldin, E. F. El-Saadany, and M. M. A. Salama, Intentional islanding of distributed generation, in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen.
Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 14961502.
LIU et al.: UNIFIED CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THREE-PHASE INVERTER IN DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
Zeng Liu (S09) received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Hunan University, Changsha,
China, in 2006, and the M.S. degree in electrical
engineering from Xian Jiaotong University, Xian,
China, in 2009, where he is currently working toward
the Ph.D. degree.
His research interests include control of singlephase and multiphase power converters for uninterrupted power supply and utility application, modeling, and analysis and control of distributed power
system based on three-phase ac bus.
1191