Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Approximate Methods
Dr. Rajesh K. N.
Assistant professor in Civil Engineering
Govt. College of Engineering, Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Module III
Analysis
y for lateral loads - Portal methodCantilever method
Factor method.
2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Why
y approximate
pp x
analysis?
y
Advantage?
g
Faster
Disadvantage?
g
Dr.RajeshKN
Dr.RajeshKN
Substitute frame
Actual frame
Dr.RajeshKN
Analysis
y done for:
Beam span moments
Beam support moments
Column moments
Dr.RajeshKN
LL p
positions for maximum positive
p
span
p moment at B
B
Influence
line for MB
D d loads
Dead
l d
Li loads
Live
l d
Dr.RajeshKN
LL pos
positions
t o s for
o maximum
ax u negative
egat e suppo
supportt moment
o e t at A
Influence
line for MA
Live loads
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
LL pos
positions
t o s for
o maximum
ax u co
column
u
moment
o e t M1 at C
C
M1
Live loads
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
LL pos
positions
t o s for
o maximum
ax u co
column
u
moment
o e t M2 at D
M2
D
Live loads
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Problem
ob e 1::
6m
4m
6m
4m
11
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
12+20 kN/m
12 kN/m
A
6m
6m
12 kN/m
C
6m
Fi d end
Fixed
d moments
t
FEM AB
wl 2 12 62
=
=
= 36 kNm
12
12
FEM BA = 36 kNm
FEM BC
32 62
=
= 96 kNm
kN
12
FEMCB = 96 kNm
FEMCD = FEM DC = 36 kNm
Dr.RajeshKN
Distribution factors
K1
4 EI 6
DFAB =
=
= 0.25 = DFDC
K1 + K2 + K3 4 EI 6 + 4 EI 4 + 4 EI 4
DFBA =
K1
4 EI 6
=
= 0.2
K1 + K2 + K3 + K4 4 EI 4 + 4 EI 6 + 4 EI 4 + 4 EI 6
Dr.RajeshKN
A
0.25
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
* *
* *
DFs
FEM
* *
* *
Dist
* *
* *
CO
Dist
0.25
Final Moments
Dr.RajeshKN
A
0.25
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
0.25
-36
36 -96
96 -36
36
DFs
FEM
12 12
-12 -12
-9
Dist
4.5 -6
6 -4.5
-6
CO
2.25
0.3 0.3
-0.3 -0.3
-2.25
52.8 -89.7
89.7 52.8
18.75
-18.75
Dist
Final Moments
Dr.RajeshKN
89.7kNm
89.7
kNm
A
32kN m
89.7kNm
32 32 6
M E = 89.7 32 +
3 = 54.3 kNm
2
2
Dr.RajeshKN
4m
3.5 m
3.5 m
6m
3.5 m
3
3.5 m
17
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
14+9 kN/m
14+9 kN/m
6m
1.5I
4m
1.5I
14 kN/m
C
4m
1.5I
Fi d end
Fixed
d moments
t
FEM AB
wl 2 23 62
=
=
= 69 kNm
12
12
FEM BC
FEM BA = 69 kNm
23 42
= FEMCB =
= 30.67 kNm
12
FEMCD = FEM DC
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
14 42
=
= 36 kNm
12
Dr.RajeshKN
Distribution factors
K1
4 E (1.5I ) 6
DFAB =
=
= 0.304
K1 + K2 + K3 4 E (1.5I ) 6 + 4 EI 3.5
3 5 + 4 EI 3.5
35
K1
1.5
1
5I 6
DFBA =
=
= 0.209
K1 + K2 + K3 + K4 1.5I 6 + I 3.5 + I 3.5 + 1.5I 4
K1
1.5I 4
DFBC =
=
= 0.313
K1 + K2 + K3 + K4 1.5I 6 + I 3.5 + I 3.5 + 1.5I 4
Dr.RajeshKN
A
0.304
0.209 0.313
0.284
0.
8 0.
0.284
8
* *
* *
DFs
FEM
* *
Dist
* *
CO
* *
Dist
* *
0.396
Final Moments
Dr.RajeshKN
A
0.304
-69
20.98
0.209 0.313
0.284 0.284
69 -30.67
30.67 -18.67
DFs
FEM
-3.41
Dist
-8.01 -12
0.396
10.49 -1.71
CO
-1.84 -2.75
Dist
69.64 -47.13
47 13kNm
47.13kNm
Final Moments
69 64kNm
69.64kNm
Dr.RajeshKN
P t l method
Portal
th d
2.
Cantilever method
3.
Factor method
22
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
PORTAL METHOD
Assumptions
1.
2.
Dr.RajeshKN
P1
P
P
2P
2P
2P
2P
P
P
2Q
2Q
P2
2Q
2Q
Q
Q
24
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
P1 = P + 2P + 2P + P
P1
P=
6
Dr.RajeshKN
P1 + P2 = Q + 2Q + 2Q + Q
P1 + P2
Q =
6
Dr.RajeshKN
Problem
ob e 3:
120 kN
Analyse
y the frame using
gp
portal method.
3.5 m
5m
3.5 m
7m
180 kN
3.5 m
27
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Horizontal shears:
120
= 20kN
6
P1 + P2 120 +180
For the bottom storeyy, Q =
=
= 50kN
6
6
Dr.RajeshKN
120kN
1.75 m
Moments:
35kNm
35m
3.5
35kN
35kNm
10kN
20kN
35kNm
35kNm
70kNm
10kN
10kN
40kN
29
Dr.RajeshKN
Beam moments:
35
35
B
35 C
35
122.5 E
122.5 F
D
35
122.5 G
122.5
122.5
35
H
122.5
30
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Column moments:
A 35 kNm
B 70
C
70
E
35
87.5
87.5
70
175
175
70
175
175
35 kNm
35
87.5
H
87.5
31
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
35
35
122.5
35
87 5
87.5
87 5
87.5
35
70
122.5
175
35
B
70
122.5
175
35
70
122 5
122.5
175
D
70
122.5
175
35
35
35
122 5
122.5
87.5
87 5
87.5
32
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Home work
40 kN
C
7.5 m
3.55 m
5m
5m
80 kN
33
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
CANTILEVER METHOD
Assumptions
1.
2.
Dr.RajeshKN
P1
y2
y1
y4
y3
P2
A1
Area of cross
section
ti
A3
A2
A4
Ad
1 1 + A2d2 + A3d3 + A4d4
y=
A1 + A2 + A3 + A4
35
Dr.RajeshKN
V1
V2
V3
V4
My
x =
I
M
I
1 2
y1
y2
3 4
y3
y4
V1 A1 V2 A2 V3 A3 V4 A4
=
=
=
y1
y2
y3
y4
(1)
Dr.RajeshKN
P1
m2
m1
h
2
B
H1
V1
H2
V2
H3
V3
h
MB P1 2 = V1m1 +V2m2 V3m3 V4m4
H4
V4
( 2)
Dr.RajeshKN
P1
H1
H2
H3
H4
P1 = H1 + H2 + H3 + H4
Dr.RajeshKN
Problem
ob e 4::
Analyse
y the frame using
g cantilever method,, if all
the columns have the same area of cross section.
120 kN
3.5 m
5m
3.5 m
7m
180 kN
3.5 m
39
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
A1 0 + A1 7 + A1 10.5 + A1 15.5 33
y=
=
= 8.25 m
A1 + A1 + A1 + A1
4
120
8.25
1.25
7.25
2.25
180
Also,
V1 A1 V2 A2 V3 A3 V4 A4
=
=
=
8.25 1.25
2.25
7.25
V1
V2
V3
V4
=
=
=
8.25 1.25 2.25 7.25
40
Dr.RajeshKN
1.25
1
25V1
2.25
2 25V1
77.25
25V1
V2 =
, V3 =
, V4 =
8.25
8.25
8.25
P1
h
2
m2
m1
O
H1
V1
H2
V2
H3
V3
H4
V4
h
MO P1 2 = V1m1 +V2m2 V3m3 V4m4
3.5
120
= V1 15.5 + V2 8.5 V3 5 V4 0
2
41
Dr.RajeshKN
120
3.5
3
5
1.25V1
2.25V1 5
8.5
= V1 15.5 +
2
8.25
8.25
V1 = 13.615 kN
1.25 13.615
V2 =
= 2.063kN ,
8.25
2 25 13
2.25
13.615
615
V3 =
= 3.713kN ,
8.25
7 25 13
7.25
13.615
615
V4 =
= 11.965 kN
8.25
Dr.RajeshKN
H1
V1
H2
V2
H3
V3
H4
V4
35
3.5
3 5
3.5
120
+
180
= V1 15.5 + V2 8.5 V3 5 V4 0
3.5
+
O
2
2
Dr.RajeshKN
35
3.5
1 25V1
1.25
25V1
3 5
3.5
22.25
8.5
5
2
2
8.25
8.25
V1 = 61.267 kN
1 25 61.267
1.25
61 267
V2 =
= 9.283kN ,
8.25
2.25 61.267
V3 =
= 16.709
16 709 kN ,
8.25
7.25 61.267
V4 =
= 53.841
53 841kN
8.25
Check : 61.267
61 267 + 9.283
9 283 16.709
16 709 53
53.841
841= 0
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
47.652kNm
120kN
1.75 m
Moments:
3.5 m
47.652kNm
13.615kN
27.3kN
13.615kN
k
45
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
27.4
B
47.6
166.8
47 6
47.6
119 2
119.2
119 2
119.2
47.6
75
166.8
187 8
187.8
29.9
75
96
187.8
27.4 57.3
57.3
96
143 2
143.2
104.7
143.2
29.9
29.9
29.9
104 7
104.7
74.8
74 8
74.8
46
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
25 kN
3.5 m
50 kN
B
6m
3.55 m
Home work
4.5 m
k
55 kN
47
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
FACTOR METHOD
Basis:
Dr.RajeshKN
Gi d and
Girder
d column
l
factors:
f t
I
L
g=
k, of all members meeting at the
joint
joint
= 1 g
c=
j
k, off all members meetingg at the joint
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Dr.RajeshKN
Problem
ob e 5:
Analyse
y the frame using
g factor method.
40 kN
I
7.5 m
3.55 m
5m
5m
80 kN
Dr.RajeshKN
Dr.RajeshKN
1
JOINT
2
MEMBER
Col
Beam
DA
3
k=I/L
k
I/L
Col
DG
0.2
EH
0.2
0.286
EF
EB
0.133
G
H
I
A
B
C
FI
FC
GD
0 133
0.133
0.286
0.2
0.286
GH
HG
HE
0.772
0.2
0.2
0.286
HI
IH
IF
AD
BE
CF
0.819
0.2
FE
0.686
0 286
0.286
ED
Beam
0.2
DE
4
k
0.772
0.133
0.133
0.286
0
286
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.486
X
X
X
0.419
0.2
0.2
0.2
5
FACTOR
c
g
=k(be
( =k(c
(
ams)/ olumn
k
s)/k
0.29
0.71
0 29
0.29
0.59
0.41
0.59
0.41
0 79
0.79
0.21
0.21
0.59
0.41
0.46
0.54
0.46
0.68
0 32
0.32
1
0
1
0
1
0
6
c/2
c/2,
g/2
from
far
end
0.5
0.3
03
0.3
0.36
0.27
0.4
0.5
03
0.3
0.16
0.5
0.15
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.34
0.23
0 11
0.11
0.15
0.21
0.11
7
5+6
cm
gm
0.79
8
MOMENT
FACTOR
1.01
0 169
0.169
0.99
0.64
0.67
0.75
140
26.6
740
114.5
0 145
0.145
0.106
0.142
0.212
140
740
140
0.215
140
140
740
740
740
122.6
0.59
83.25
0.41
57.85
133 03
133.03
1
0.559
29.1
16.5
0.441
1
13.0
16.58
29.5
0.106
0.121
0.123
0
123
0.23
0.242
0.222
12
Beam
Mom
= MC
DFB
14.6
89.3
29.1
0.128
0.134
0.8
0.91
11
DFB
=G/G
23 2
23.2
0.132
1 09
1.09
0.43
0
43
1.15
1.21
1.11
140
0.182
0.37
0.71
0.74
99.4
0.19
0.194
0.91
740
0.202
0.95
0.68
10
Col
Col.
Mom,
MC =
MT
C/C
C= G =
cm gm
k
k
0.158
0 59
0.59
9
Total
Col.
Mom, MT
16.58
16
58
144.7
152.2
139.6
F the
For
h top storey, C = 0.169
0 169 + 0.194
0 194 + 0.106
0 106 + 0.212
0 212 + 0.215
0 215 + 00.123
123 = 11.019
019
For the bottom storey, C = 0.158 + 0.182 + 0.142 + 0.23 + 0.242 + 0.222
= 1.176
Dr.RajeshKN
Home work
120 kN
C
6m
4m
6m
6m
60 kN
54
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur
Dr.RajeshKN
Summary
Analysis
y for lateral loads - Portal methodCantilever method
Factor method.
Dr.RajeshKN