Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In this paper we introduce the notion of ssymmetric skew 3- reverse derivation of prime ring and we consider R
be a non-commutative 3! Torsion free prime ring,
, and
be a symmetric skew 3-reverse derivation associated with the automorphism , suppose that
, then we prove that
KEYWORDS: Prime Ring, Derivation, Reverse Derivation, Symmetric Skew 3- Derivation, Symmetric Skew 3,
Reverse Derivation and Automorphism
INTRODUCTION
Bresar and Vukman[3] have introduced the notion of a reverse derivation and Samman and Alyamani [7] have
studied some properties of prime (or) semi prime rings with reverse derivations.Ajda Fosner [1] introduced the notion of
symmetric skew 3- derivations of prime or semiprime rings and proved that under certain conditions a prime ring with a
nonzero symmetric skew 3- derivation has to be commutative.
Preliminaries
Throughout the paper,
A mapping
be an integer. A ring
an automorphism of .
and
implies
is prime if
. For all
,
if
, the symbol
, implies that
, for all
or
. An additive
is called a reverse
derivation if
, for all
if
for all
.
Before stating our main theorem, let us give some basic definitions and well known results which we will need in
our further investigation.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
70
Let
, then obviously,
(1)
, the map
The map
defined by
is called a trace of
. But for all
, we have
is an odd function.
, we have
.
Of course, if
is symmetric, then the above three relations are equivalent to each other.
MAIN RESULTS
To prove the main theorem, first we prove the following lemma.
Lemma: 1. Let
or
. If
, for all
, then either
for all
and since
Thus,
is prime, either
or
Theorem: 1
Let
automorphism of
, and
, suppose that
then
, be an
(2)
71
Replace
by
Replacing
by
If we write
instead of
in (3), we obtain,
, for all
Thus by Lemma 1,it follows that
So, let
and
. Obviously,
, for all
, we have,
(4)
(6)
Replacing
by
, we get,
www.tjprc.org
, as desired.
editor@tjprc.org
72
Since
, we have,
(7)
Writing
instead of , we obtain,
,
(8)
Let
. Then
, since is an ideal of
(9)
Since
Replacing
by
, where
.
, we get,
It follows that
and since
is prime, we have,
(10)
Finally writing
instead of , where
It follows that
and since
,
, we get,
is prime, we have,
73
REFERENCES
1.
Ajda Fosner: Prime and semiprime rings with symmetric skew 3-derivations, Aequat. Math. 87 (2014), 191-200.
2.
Argac, N.: On prime and semiprime rings with derivations. Algebra Colloq. 13, 371- 380 (2006).
3.
Bresar. M. and Vukman. J: On some additive mappings in rings with involution, Aequationes Math. 38(1989),
178-185.
4.
Jung, Y. S, Park, K. H: On prime and semiprime rings with permuting 3- derivations. Bull. KoreanMath. Soc. 44,
789-794 (2007).
5.
Park, K. H: On prime and semiprime rings with symmetric n-derivations. J. Chungcheong Math. Soc. 22,
451-458(2009).
6.
7.
Samman. M. and Alyamani. N, Derivations and reverse derivations in semi prime rings, International
Mathematical Forum, 2, (2007), No. 39, 1895-1902.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org