Crescent Hill Baptist Church http://www.crescenthillbaptistchurch.org/oldsite/sermon-09-7-08.

htm

Crescent Hill Baptist Church

Louisville, Kentucky

Pentecost 17
September 7, 2008
W. Gregory Pope

SERIES: The New Monasticism

HOW TO HAVE A GOOD FIGHT

Exodus 12:1-14; Psalm 149; Romans 13:8-14; Matthew 18:15-20

We have before us in today’s texts and the ones for next week the most important words to a church in
order to protect it from disaster. They are words that address disagreement, confrontation, forgiveness and
reconciliation.

At work within these texts are two monastic values the Rule of Benedict addresses in detail but are
foreign to contemporary church life: discipline and stability.

THE CALL TO LOVE, THE REALITY OF CONFLICT

All of which is wrapped up in the call to love even in the midst of conflict.

Benedict says the Rule is given in order to amend faults and to safeguard love. [1]

The apostle Paul writes, “Owe no one anything but to love them.”

When you sign up to be a disciple of Jesus you are taking a vow against hatred; you’re making a promise,
in so far as you can with God’s help, to see all people through eyes of love. That includes our enemies.
Jesus couldn’t have said it plainer: “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

We continually bear out the truth the Bible teaches that human beings are broken by sin. So it ought not
surprise us when people can’t get along. The Bible doesn’t teach us to expect a world where everybody
naturally loves and respects everyone else. But Jesus does tell his disciples to “love one another.” And
Jesus seems to think that the Holy Spirit will enable members of his body to do that. Indeed, that’s how
Jesus says other people will know that there is good news for the world - because a church exists where
people genuinely love one another. It’s a little scary to say it, but I think John Howard Yoder was right
when he said, “Where Christians are not united, the gospel is not true in that place.” [2]

We all inevitably create trouble for the people around us. Not just because all of us are flawed, though we
are; it’s also because we are simply different from each other, with different temperaments, and different
ideas about how to proceed. And our differences rub up against each other.

There is possibly a place where differences do not rub up against each other. In his book The Great
Divorce, C. S. Lewis imagines hell as a vast, gray city that spreads out forever, inhabited only at the
edges, the enormous center of it filled with millions of vacant houses on endless empty streets. All the
houses were once occupied by citizens of hell, who disliked their neighbors and moved, and disliked their
new neighbors and moved again and again. Preferring vast distance to dealing with difficulty and
difference. [3]

We can’t love each other without some conflict. And we can’t keep loving each other without reaching
through conflict to be reconciled. Jesus gives guidance as to how.

1 of 5 15/01/2010 15:24
Crescent Hill Baptist Church http://www.crescenthillbaptistchurch.org/oldsite/sermon-09-7-08.htm

ACT I - ONE ON ONE

First: “If a brother or sister sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If
they listen - a most important Benedictine, monastic word - if they listen you’ve got back your brother or
sister.”

Notice two things:

One, Jesus is talking about people in a covenant relationship. When he says “brother,” he means a
member of the family of faith, the church. Maybe an official church, like Crescent Hill Baptist, or an
unofficial church, as in friends who live in a covenant of faith, or a family, the church in your house. He is
talking to people in a love relationship, and he’s saying these things all for the purpose of staying faithful
to each other.

It’s what Benedictine monastics strive for when they take a vow of stability. It is the promise to stay in
one place for the rest of your life. Can you imagine in our highly mobile society that sees mobility as a
symbol of our freedom, can you imagine deciding that you are going to remain in one place for the
remainder of your life?

Whatever could be the benefit of such a vow? Well, Benedict would say that you can only grow in the
spiritual life by staying with one community. Where people get to know you through and through and hold
you accountable to grow and change. The vow of stability also helps the monastic avoid the temptation to
believe that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence in another faith community. [4]

So, this guidance from Jesus on confronting one who lives with us in covenant community is for the
purpose of helping us stay faithful to each other.

A second point about this guidance is that it is primarily for serious offenses. It’s not about someone who
rubs you the wrong way or disagrees with your position or looks at you funny. It’s about someone who
sins against you. Disagreements and annoyances are normal parts of relationship. What mature love does
with those is to bear them with patience. But to be sinned against - lied to, betrayed, attacked, abandoned,
having someone not live up to their responsibilities to you - this is serious because it has the potential of
breaking covenant. And that’s why Jesus says we are to confront it.

And you do it yourself, just you and the other alone, face to face. We keep the matter private. There’s no
spreading of the news to others. We must not go about condemning the offender. You don’t gossip about
your hurt, but neither do you nurse it in wounded silence. You could do that if it were all about you, but
it’s not about you. A relationship is at stake. And not just a personal relationship, but a community
covenant relationship. The purpose of this guidance is not to help justify the anger or hurt feelings of the
offended but to restore relationship.

So you take the initiative. Isn’t that something? Jesus hands the initiative to the sinned-against. He tells us
to make time to talk, one on one, with those who have done us wrong.

We take the initiative because, in some cases, the offender may be unaware of the offense. It is a gesture
of reconciliation. The one who has been offended bears the responsibility of initiating reconciliation and
mending the breach. The offended is not to sit back and wait for the other to apologize.

If this guidance gives us pause, I think it’s meant to. The very difficulty of deciding to go to someone like
this invites us to pause and consider how we ourselves may also have been at fault. Maybe we’ll come to
see that the greater sin was our own. Maybe we’ll go and tell them more about our sin than theirs.

David Garland wants us to notice that this call to reprove a fellow Christian is preceded by demands to be
humble as a child, to purge one’s one sins, and to seek urgently after the one who strays like a shepherd
after a lost sheep, and that it is followed by a demand for unlimited forgiveness. [5]

2 of 5 15/01/2010 15:24
Crescent Hill Baptist Church http://www.crescenthillbaptistchurch.org/oldsite/sermon-09-7-08.htm

Barbara Brown Taylor suggests we ask some questions before we proceed, such as: Am I sure I know
what I’m talking about? Have I given the other person every benefit of the doubt? What are my motives in
confronting her with my feelings? Do I want to make him feel bad, or do I really want peace? And
remember, Taylor says, being right is less important than being in relationship. [6]

Those are important questions to ask before pressing on to the difficult task of saying hard truth to people
who have sinned against us.

It’s all the harder because of the tone it must take: not castigating or shaming, just telling the truth in love.
This is a call for direct confrontation but not verbal abuse. Do you remember those words from
Ephesians? “Speak the truth in love. . . Be angry, but do not sin . . .Let no evil talk come out of your
mouths, but only what is useful for building up . . . And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving
one another, as God in Christ has forgiven you.” Kindness is the best chance we have of winning back a
brother or sister. Scripture says it is the kindness of God that leads us to repentance. And that is the point -
not to get something off your chest, or to heal yourself, but to restore relationship. And that’s what makes
it a good fight.

Even if harm was done deliberately, your attitude of love and gentleness may very well lead to
reconciliation. What matters is repairing the relationship between the two family members. It’s about
winning your brother or sister, not winning an argument. It is possible to win the argument and lose your
brother.

If the person listens, which would seem to include hearing, accepting, repenting, and perhaps requesting
forgiveness, then you have gained your brother or sister back to full relationship, to make the flock whole
again.

Sometimes, though, it doesn’t succeed. Some of us don’t listen well, even when we are lovingly
confronted with our sins. So Jesus goes on.

ACT II - TWO OR THREE ON ONE

“But of you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be
confirmed by two or three witnesses.”

Now, what is this - a posse? No, this is about people in covenant who aren’t about to give up on each
other. To bring witnesses is to convince and persuade not to judge and convict. It’s about how incredibly
precious our relationships under God truly are, and how all of us are harmed when even two of us are
estranged. Jesus learned this from the Law of Moses in Deuteronomy (19:15).

So, you take one or two with you, and not your best buddies either, maybe their best buddies; but most
importantly, one or two people who live in covenant with both of you, helping you both hear and say and
see what’s true. It may be that we are wrong and we need wisdom outside ourselves.

But of course, even this can fail.

ACT III - THE CONGREGATION ON ONE

If it does, then Jesus says go ahead and bring in the whole family, the entire congregation. Let all of you
stretch toward the healing of a wound and the restoring of relationship. This is the length that covenant
love will go to. We’re to go as far as we possibly can for the sake of reconciliation.

Frank Stagg says that these instructions picture a community where every member watches over another,
the whole church assumes responsibility for every member, and every member is accountable to the whole
church. [7]

3 of 5 15/01/2010 15:24
Crescent Hill Baptist Church http://www.crescenthillbaptistchurch.org/oldsite/sermon-09-7-08.htm

To engage the congregation is to get the congregation to exercise its moral influence, not its disciplinary
muscle. [8]

The goal of Benedictine discipline “is always meant to heal, never to destroy; to cure, not to crush.” [9]

And the church, Jesus says, must pray together before disciplining the erring person.

And if in the efforts of everyone together, the other refuses to be reconciled, what then?

ACT IV - WHAT TO DO WITH THE UNREPENTANT

Then, Jesus says, “If the offender refuses to listen to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and
a tax collector.”

This gets to the act of church discipline.

Part of the discipline is to let them go. Honor their freedom. Let them be as separate as they choose to be.
Tell the truth about what has broken. Grieve them and let them go. It may seem harsh. It has been used as
the basis for that ugliest of words, “excommunication.”

What it’s really about is an utter commitment to the practice of covenant love. So vital is it that when it’s
threatened we risk hard conversations, make every attempt to get it back. And it’s so cherished that when
it dies, we don’t pretend it hasn’t. This too, in fact, is love for members of the family who won’t reconcile:
to accept and formalize their choice to be separate, and to honor love by giving burial to what has died
between us.

We often see our sin as a personal matter between ourselves and God or us and the offended party. But it
is a matter of the Christian congregation to which we belong, and may damage its life.

These instructions are set in the context not of self-righteous vindictiveness, but of radical caring for the
marginal and straying, and of grace and forgiveness beyond all imagining.

This is a people who are to love another so intensely that they refuse to risk the loss of the one who has
gone astray - or the loss of ourselves in harboring resentments. [10]

But whatever others do, we don’t stop loving. Not ever. As a matter of fact, did you notice something odd
about how Jesus said to treat those who finally refuse all our efforts at reconciliation? He said let them go.
But he also said, “Treat them like Gentiles and tax collectors.”

In one sense, treating someone as a Gentile and tax collector means rejection, exclusion,
excommunication. In another sense, and quite ironically, it means the radical, offensive inclusion
demanded by the gospel itself.

How did Jesus treat Gentiles and tax collectors? He had lunch with them and went to parties with them.
He gave covenant love to anyone, and he never broke covenant with anyone, not even with us. And he
never set limits on human forgiveness.

Listen to how the Rule of Benedict describes our love for the offender. He writes: The [monastic
community, or the church] must exercise the utmost care and concern for the wayward because “it is not
the healthy who need a physician, but the sick” (Matt 9:12). Therefore they ought to use every skill of a
wise physician and send in . . . mature and wise members who . . . may support the wavering sister or
brother, urge them to be humble as a way of making [amends], and “console them lest they be
overwhelmed by excessive sorrow” (2 Cor 2:7). . . . As the apostle [Paul] says: “Let love be reaffirmed”
(2 Cor 2:8), and let all pray for the one who is [not reconciled]. [11]

4 of 5 15/01/2010 15:24
Crescent Hill Baptist Church http://www.crescenthillbaptistchurch.org/oldsite/sermon-09-7-08.htm

So my fellow Gentiles, no matter what others may choose to do, as followers of Jesus we are never in
position to break covenant love with anyone.

We come to the table of One who never has broken covenant relationship with us. And never will. He
reached out to us to the point of death. And is risen and lives among us as we gather together, reaching out
to us still, calling us to forgiveness and reconciliation.

___________________________________

1. St. Benedict, The Rule of St. Benedict, ed. Timothy Fry, Vintage Spiritual Classics, 1998, Prologue
2. Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, New Monasticism: What It Has to Say to Today’s Church, Brazos, 2008,
128
3. C. S. Lewis, The Great Divorce, Simon and Schuster, 1946, 20-21. Barbara Brown Taylor connects
Lewis’ vision of hell with Matt 18:15-20 in The Seeds of Heaven, Westminster John Knox, 2004, 87-88
4. Christopher Jamison, Finding Sanctuary: Monastic Steps for Everyday Life, 117
5. David Garland, Reading Matthew, Crossroad, 1993, 190-191
6. Taylor, 88-89
7. Frank Stagg, “Matthew,” Broadman, 184
8. Garland, 191
9. Joan Chittister, The Rule of Benedict: Insights For the Ages, Crossroad, 1992, 104
10. Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew, Brazos Press, 2006, 165
11. St. Benedict, Chapter 27

select September 7, 2008 sermon and respond as blog

feed back to Greg

return to Sermon Index

CRESCENT HILL BAPTIST CHURCH

2800 Frankfort Avenue
Louisville, Kentucky 40206
(502) 896-4425

We would like to hear from you.

Return to oldsite Home page

Return to newsite Home page

5 of 5 15/01/2010 15:24