Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt
Abstract
Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) with photodiode array detection (PDA) was applied to simultaneously determine eleven organic
acids in wine, beer, and fruit and vegetable juices after derivatisation with 2-nitrophenylhydrazine (2-NPH) in the presence of N-(3dimethylaminopropyl)-N0 -ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC HCl). The parameters affecting CZE separation included type and
concentration of buffer, pH, organic additive and applied voltage. Optimum conditions at 25 1C were: 30 mmol l1 borate buffer, pH
10.0, containing 100 ml l1 acetonitrile, at 20 kV, sample injection at 0.5 psi for 5 s, with direct detection at 230 nm. Separation of eleven
organic acids was achieved within 12 min. Linear calibration curves with good t were obtained in the range 10.0100.0 mg l1. Limits of
detection ranged from 2.0 to 10.0 mg l1. Intra-day precision with RSDp4.0% for migration time and p5.0% for peak area, and interday precision with RSDp6.0% and p9.0% for migration time and peak area, were obtained. Recovery for all beverage samples was
97715%.
r 2007 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Organic acids; Capillary zone electrophoresis; 2-nitrophenylhydrazine; Wine; Beer; Fruit juice; Vegetable juice
1. Introduction
Organic acids have important roles in beverages because
they affect the organoleptic properties (e.g. taste, aroma
and colour), stability, nutrition, acceptability and in
maintaining quality (Shui & Leong, 2002; Soyer, Koca, &
Karadeniz, 2003). Levels of organic acids in foods and
beverages provide relevant information for monitoring the
fermentation processes (Castineira, Pena, Herrero, &
Garc a-Mart n, 2002; Esteves, Lima, Lima, & Duarte,
2004). These acids can be used for differentiation,
classication, origin identication or possible adulteration
of beverages. Therefore, it is important to be able to
precisely determine the amounts of different acids present
for quality control during beverage production, transformation, storage and distribution.
The most widely used methods for determination of
organic acids are gas chromatography (GC) (Docherty &
Ziemann, 2001) and high-performance liquid chromatograCorresponding author. Tel.: +66 4320 2222 41x12243;
fax: +66 4320 2373.
E-mail address: supalax@kku.ac.th (S. Srijaranai).
0023-6438/$30.00 r 2007 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2007.01.007
1742
18
18
16
16
14
14
12
10
8
6
4
1743
acetic
lactic
suberic
glutaric
succinic
malic
malonic
2-NPH
tartaric
oxalic
citric
t-aconitic
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Borate concentration (mmoL/L)
50
250
Fig. 1. Effect of (a) borate concentration and (b) acetronitrile content on migration time of acid hydrazides. Capillary electrophoretic conditions:
30 mmol l1 borate and 100 ml l1 ACN, voltage of 20 kV, sample injection (0.5 psi, 5 s) and detection at 230 nm.
5
2-NPH
2
0.06
4
6
Absorbance (AU)
borate buffer. With increasing borate concentration resolution increased, but the migration times also increased. In
general, the electrophoretic mobility is inversely proportional to the viscosity and concentration of the running
buffer (Chen, Chen, Lin, & Chang, 1999) so increasing
buffer concentration results in longer migration time,
associated with increased Joule heating in the capillary
which results in decreasing separation efciency. Therefore,
borate buffer concentration of 30 mmol l1 was chosen.
8
0.04
9
3
0.02
10
11
0.00
0
6
8
Time (min)
10
12
14
0.08
2-NPH
0.06
Absorbance (AU)
6
0.04
2
3
0.02
0.00
0
10
12
Time(min)
0.04
Absorbance (AU)
1744
2-NPH
10
0.02
1
0.00
10
12
Time (min)
Fig. 3. Electropherograms of (a) red grape wine and (b) jambolan wine.
CZE conditions and peak assignments as described in Fig. 2.
Table 1
Linear equations, regression coefcients, LOD, LOQ, precision and recovery range of the studied organic acids
Acid
Acetic
Lactic
Suberic
Glutaric
Succinic
Malic
Malonic
Tartaric
Oxalic
Citric
t-Aconitic
a
Linear equation
y 641.12x+17918
y 206.02x+3223.6
y 364.67x+441.4
y 905.13x+1413.4
y 1126.80x+10787
y 808.42x+1450.6
y 459.50x+82.64
y 1122.60x+1078
y 1186.9x+773.69
y 523.61x+896.33
y 151.46x+4310.3
R2
0.9995
0.9998
0.9999
0.9991
0.9998
0.9992
0.9992
0.9992
0.9998
0.9994
0.9996
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
20.0
Inter-day (n 4 3)
tM
Peak area
tM
Peak area
2.34
1.44
1.48
1.67
1.74
1.86
1.86
2.26
3.15
2.46
2.87
4.64
3.58
4.04
4.38
2.29
3.98
3.94
4.90
2.66
2.95
4.71
2.32
2.04
2.00
2.27
2.34
2.45
2.67
3.17
5.25
3.22
5.54
6.64
6.55
5.14
8.44
5.18
6.99
8.49
5.44
8.60
5.00
6.92
83.2110.9
85.0109.9
82.7111.9
83.4112.4
82.6104.6
89.4111.9
84.6106.2
84.7111.1
81.7105.4
84.8102.3
83.9112.0
1745
Table 2
The contents of organic acids in wine and beer samples
Sample
Lactic
Suberic
Glutaric
Succinic
Malic
Malonic
Tartaric
Citric
0.54
n.d.
0.36
0.95
1.16
0.48
1.23
0.76
4.54
0.05
0.06
4.11
n.d.
0.52
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.45
0.32
0.99
0.26
0.30
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.12
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.05
0.05
n.d.
0.56
0.75
2.10
1.68
5.73
2.52
3.58
3.25
0.06
0.08
1.44
4.41
6.48
1.39
0.74
3.58
0.51
1.58
11.01
0.21
0.28
n.d.
0.44
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.24
0.12
2.34
2.38
5.09
5.17
3.86
0.42
n.d.
0.16
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
13.49
1.66
12.28
7.34
4.69
12.44
2.58
n.d.
0.41
0.65
Wines
Esteves et al. (2004)
De Villiers et al. (2003)
0.060.46
0.401.08
0.532.46
0.614.03
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
0.240.71
0.411.59
0.492.38
0.33.05
n.r.
n.r.
0.822.75
0.922.67
n.r.
n.d.0.32
Beers
Perez-Ruiz et al. (2004)
n.r.
0.550.63
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
0.410.72
n.r.
n.d.0.22
0.730.20
Table 3
The contents of organic acids in fruit and vegetable juice samples
Sample
Succinic
Malic
Malonic
Tartaric
Citric
Red grape 1
Red grape 2
Tangerine orange
Apple
Mixed berry
Longan
Grapefruit avoured
Muscat avoured
Cherry avoured
Mixed fruit and vegetable
Broccoli
Purple carrot
Tomato
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.14
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.06
n.d.
0.83
10.30
0.62
2.96
0.73
0.05
0.37
0.65
0.76
0.89
2.46
5.50
7.66
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.03
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.20
n.d.
0.19
n.d.
0.50
7.58
n.d.
n.d.
0.16
n.d.
n.d.
0.07
0.06
n.d.
0.45
n.d.
n.d.
1.79
2.49
5.39
1.77
7.55
0.09
6.36
5.23
3.84
8.95
9.90
7.47
13.23
Apple juice
Miwa (2000)
Cunha et al. (2002)
Chinnici et al. (2005)
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
0.100.84
0.207.20
0.204.90
1.375.61
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
0.308.50
0.103.70
3.31.09
Orange juice
Cunha et al. (2002)
n.r.
n.d.0.20
n.d.4.30
n.r.
n.d.
1.5012.50
Grape juice
Soyer et al. (2003)
n.r.
n.r.
1.403.50
n.r.
4.108.00
0.030.20
1746