Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OUUT
TLLIIN
NEE O
OFF T
THHE
E
U.S.LEGAL SYSTEM
OUTLINE OF THE
U.S.LEGAL SYSTEM
U.S.LEGAL SYSTEM
C O N T E N T S
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Legal System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
CHAPTER 1
History and Organization of the Federal Judicial System . . . . . . . . . 18
CHAPTER 2
History and Organization of State Judicial Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
CHAPTER 3
Jurisdiction and Policy-Making Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
CHAPTER 4
Lawyers, Litigants, and Interest Groups in the Judicial Process . . . . 72
CHAPTER 5
The Criminal Court Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
CHAPTER 6
The Civil Court Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
CHAPTER 7
Federal Judges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
CHAPTER 8
Implementation and Impact of Judicial Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
INTRODUCTION
THE
U.S.
LEGAL
SYSTEM
The Constitution has vested the power to pass legislation in Congress, here gathered in a joint
session for President George W. Bush’s budget speech in 2001. The executive power, in turn,
is entrusted to the President.
INTRODUCTION 9
presents the statutes in a logical quite specific but others, most notably,
arrangement. Title 20, for instance, “To regulate Commerce with foreign
contains the various statutes pertain- Nations, and among the several States,”
ing to Education, and Title 22 those are less so. Obviously the power to in-
covering Foreign Relations. terpret the less precise delegations is
Congress’ lawmaking power is lim- extremely important. Early in the
ited. More precisely, it is delegated by young republic’s history, the judiciary
the American people through the branch assumed this role and thus se-
Constitution, which specifies areas cured an additional and extremely
where Congress may or may not legis- vital role in the U.S. legal system.
late. Article I, Section 9 of the Consti-
tution forbids Congress from passing Judicial
certain types of laws. Congress may As with the other branches, the U.S.
not, for instance, pass an “ex post facto” judiciary possesses only those powers
law (a law that applies retroactively, or the Constitution delegates. The Con-
“after the fact”), or levy a tax on ex- stitution extended federal jurisdiction
ports. Article I, Section 8 lists areas only to certain kinds of disputes. Arti-
where Congress may legislate. Some of cle III, Section 2 lists them. Two of the
these (“To establish Post Offices”) are most significant are cases involving a
question of federal law (“all Cases in
Law and Equity, arising under this
Constitution, the Laws of the United
States, and Treaties made…”) and “di-
versity” cases, or disputes between cit-
izens of two different states. Diversity
jurisdiction allows each party to avoid
litigating his case before the courts of
his adversary’s state.
A second judicial power emerged in
the Republic’s early years. As explained
in Chapter 2, the U.S. Supreme Court
in the case of Marbury v. Madison
(1803) interpreted its delegated pow-
ers to include the authority to deter-
mine whether a statute violated the
Laws passed by one of the 50 state Constitution and, if it did, to declare
legislatures, such as the New York State
such a law invalid. A law may be un-
Assembly shown above during a roll call,
apply only to the citizens of that state or constitutional because it violates rights
outsiders who reside or do business there. guaranteed to the people by the Con-
10 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Federal and state courts hear two kinds of disputes: civil and criminal. Here an attorney
representing landowners in a civil action presents his arguments to the South Dakota
Supreme Court.
Left, civil law covers statutes pertaining to marriage and divorce. This couple is being married
in this civil ceremony performed by a judge. At right, a judge in Texas. In the past few
decades, the U.S. judiciary has expanded to include more women and minorities.
12 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
G it is useful to distinguish
among different types of laws
and of actions, or lawsuits, brought
tial penalties also differ. A criminal de-
fendant can be convicted only upon
the determination of guilt “beyond a
before the courts and of the remedies reasonable doubt.” In a civil case, the
the law affords in each type of case. plaintiff need only show a “prepon-
derance of evidence,” a weaker formu-
Civil/Criminal lation that essentially means “more
Courts hear two kinds of disputes: likely than not.” A convicted criminal
civil and criminal. A civil action in- can be imprisoned, but the losing
volves two or more private parties, at party in a civil case is liable only for
least one of which alleges a violation legal or equitable remedies, as ex-
of a statute or some provision of com- plained below.
mon law. The party initiating the law-
suit is the plaintiff; his opponent the Legal and Equitable Remedies
defendant. A defendant can raise a The U.S. legal system affords a wide
counterclaim against a plaintiff or a but not unlimited range of remedies.
cross-claim against a co-defendant, so The criminal statutes typically list
long as they are related to the plain- for a given offense the range of fines
tiff ’s original complaint. Courts prefer or prison time a court may impose.
to hear in a single lawsuit all the Other parts of the criminal code may
claims arising from a dispute. Busi- in some jurisdictions allow stiffer
ness litigations, as for breach of con- penalties for repeat offenders. Punish-
tract, or tort cases, where a party ment for the most serious offenses,
alleges he has been injured by anoth- or felonies, is more severe than for
er’s negligence or willful misconduct, misdemeanors.
are civil cases. In civil actions, most American
While most civil litigations are courts are authorized to choose
between private parties, the federal among legal and equitable remedies.
government or a state government is The distinction means less today than
always a party to a criminal action. in the past but is still worth under-
It prosecutes, in the name of the standing. In 13th century England,
people, defendants charged with vio- “courts of law” were authorized to de-
lating laws that prohibit certain con- cree monetary remedies only. If a
duct as injurious to the public welfare. defendant’s breach of contract cost
Two businesses might litigate a civil the plaintiff £50, such a court could
action for breach of contract, but only order the defendant to pay that sum to
INTRODUCTION 15
the plaintiff. These damages were One famous example illustrates the
sufficient in many instances, but not differences between civil and criminal
in others, such as a contract for the law, and the remedies that each can
sale of a rare artwork or a specific par- offer. The state of California charged
cel of land. During the 13th and 14th the former football star O.J. Simpson
centuries, “courts of equity” were with murder. Had Simpson been con-
formed. These tribunals fashioned victed, he would have been impris-
equitable remedies like specific per- oned. He was not convicted, however,
formance, which compelled parties as the jury ruled the prosecution failed
to perform their obligations, rather to prove Simpson’s guilt beyond a rea-
than merely forcing them to pay sonable doubt. Afterwards, Mrs.
damages for the injury caused by their Simpson’s family sued Simpson for
nonperformance. By the 19th century, wrongful death, a civil action. The
most American jurisdictions had jury in this case determined that a
eliminated the distinction between preponderance of the evidence
law and equity. Today, with rare excep- demonstrated Simpson’s responsibili-
tions, U.S. courts can award either ty for the death of his wife. It ordered
legal or equitable remedies as the Simpson to pay money damages — a
situation requires. legal remedy — to the plaintiffs.
The U.S. Constitution explicitly sets out that large parts of the U.S. legal system remain under
the control of the individual states. Here, Cook County, Illinois, Circuit Court Judge William H.
Haddad, left, and Illinois Supreme Court Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald.
16 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
remains within the state domain. ders between the federal and state
While no state may deny a citizen courts but it also explores the ques-
any right guaranteed by the federal tion of who may sue, and of the kinds
Constitution, many interpret their of cases courts will hear. Chapter 4 ex-
own constitutions as bestowing even pands the focus from the courts to the
more generous rights and privileges. groups who appear before them. The
State courts applying state law contin- practice of law in the United States is
ue to decide most contractual dis- studied, and the typical litigants de-
putes. The same is true of most scribed. The chapter also explains the
criminal cases, and of civil tort ac- role played by interest groups that
tions. Family law, including such mat- press particular cases to advance their
ters as marriage and divorce, is almost social and political agendas. Chapter 5
exclusively a state matter. For most details how the courts handle criminal
Americans most of the time, the legal cases while Chapter 6 turns the focus
system means the police officers and to civil actions. Chapter 7 describes
courts of their own state, or of the var- how federal judges are selected. The
ious municipalities and other political final chapter explores how certain ju-
subdivisions within that state. dicial decisions — those of higher
This introduction offers a mere courts especially — can themselves
thumbnail sketch of the legal system. amount to a form of policymaking
The remainder of the volume affords and thus further entwine the judiciary
greater detail, flavor, and understand- in a complex relationship with the leg-
ing. Chapters 1 and 2 describe respec- islative and executive branches.
tively how the federal and state court
systems have been organized, while — By Michael Jay Friedman
Chapter 3 explains at length the com- Michael Jay Friedman is a
plex question of jurisdiction. The Program Officer in the U.S.
Department of State, Bureau of
chapter necessarily delineates the bor- International Information
Programs. He holds a Ph.D. in
American History from the
University of Pennsylvania and a
J.D. degree from Georgetown
University Law Center.
C H A P T E R
1
HISTORY
AND
ORGANIZATION
OF
THE
FEDERAL
JUDICIAL
SYSTEM
T H E U N I T E D S TAT E S C O U RT S Y S T E M
U.S. Court of
94 U.S. Courts International Trade Army, Navy-Marine
Corps, Air Force,
and U.S. Court of
and Coast Guard
Federal Claims
United States Courts of Criminal
Tax Court U.S. Court of Appeals
Veteran Appeals
* The 12 regional Courts of Appeals also receive cases from a number of federal agencies.
** The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit also receives cases from the International
Trade Commission, the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Patent and Trademark
Office, and the Board of Contract Appeals.
pressed the fear that the new govern- interpretation of federal laws could
ment would destroy the rights of the not be left to a state court and certain-
states. The other group of legislators, ly not to several state tribunals, whose
suspicious of the parochial prejudice judgments might disagree. Thus, the
of state courts, feared that litigants Supreme Court must interpret federal
from other states and other countries legislation. Another of the Founders’
would be dealt with unjustly. This lat- intentions was for the federal govern-
ter group naturally favored a judicial ment to act directly upon individual
system that included lower federal citizens as well as upon the states.
courts. The law that emerged from this Given the Supreme Court’s impor-
debate, the Judiciary Act of 1789, set tance to the U.S. system of govern-
up a judicial system composed of a ment, it was perhaps inevitable that
Supreme Court, consisting of a chief the Court would evoke great contro-
justice and five associate justices; three versy. Charles Warren, a leading stu-
circuit courts, each comprising two dent of the Supreme Court, said in
justices of the Supreme Court and a The Supreme Court in United States
district judge; and 13 district courts, History: “Nothing in the Court’s histo-
each presided over by one district ry is more striking than the fact that
judge. The power to create inferior while its significant and necessary
federal courts, then, was immediately place in the Federal form of Govern-
exercised. Congress created not one ment has always been recognized by
but two sets of lower courts. thoughtful and patriotic men, never-
theless, no branch of the Government
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT and no institution under the Constitu-
upreme Court Justice Charles
S
tion has sustained more continuous
Evans Hughes wrote in The attack or reached its present position
Supreme Court of the United after more vigorous opposition.”
States (1966) that the Court “is dis-
tinctly American in conception and The Court’s First Decade
function, and owes little to prior judi- George Washington, the first president
cial institutions.” To understand what of the United States, established two
the framers of the Constitution envi- important traditions when he ap-
sioned for the Court, another Ameri- pointed the first Supreme Court jus-
can concept must be considered: the tices. First, he began the practice of
federal form of government. The naming to the Court those with whom
Founders provided for both a national he was politically compatible. Wash-
government and state governments; ington, the only president ever to have
the courts of the states were to be an opportunity to appoint the entire
bound by federal laws. However, final federal judiciary, filled federal judge-
Geographical Boundaries of U.S. Courts of Appeals and U.S. District Courts
Washington
1
Puerto Rico
Florida
Hawaii
Nothern 9
Mariana Guam
Islands
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 23
24 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
ships, without exception, with faithful this first session of the Court more
members of the Federalist Party. fully than any other event connected
Second, Washington’s appointees of- with the new government; and their
fered roughly equal geographic repre- accounts were reproduced in the lead-
sentation on the federal courts. His ing papers of all the states.”
first six appointees to the Supreme During its first decade the Court
Court included three Northerners and decided only about 50 cases. Given the
three Southerners. scarcity of Supreme Court business in
The chief justiceship was the most the early days, Chief Justice Jay’s con-
important appointment Washington tributions may be traced primarily to
made. The president felt that the man his circuit court decisions and his ju-
to head the first Supreme Court dicial conduct.
should be an eminent lawyer, states- Perhaps the most important of Jay’s
man, executive, and leader. Many contributions, however, was his insis-
names were presented to Washington, tence that the Supreme Court could
and at least one person formally not provide legal advice for the execu-
applied for the position. Ultimately, tive branch in the form of an advisory
Washington settled upon John Jay opinion. Jay was asked by Treasury
of New York. Although only 44 years Secretary Alexander Hamilton to issue
old, Jay had experience as a lawyer, an opinion on the constitutionality of
a judge, and a diplomat. In addition, a resolution passed by the Virginia
he was the main drafter of his state’s House of Representatives, and Presi-
first constitution. dent Washington asked Jay for advice
The Supreme Court met for the on questions relating to his Neutrality
first time on Monday, February 1, Proclamation. In both instances, Jay’s
1790, in the Royal Exchange, a build- response was a firm “No,” because Ar-
ing located in the Wall Street section ticle III of the Constitution provides
of New York City, and its first session that the Court is to decide only cases
lasted just 10 days. During this period pertaining to actual controversies.
the Court selected a clerk, chose a seal,
and admitted several lawyers to prac- The Impact of Chief Justice
tice before it in the future. There were, Marshall
of course, no cases to be decided; the John Marshall served as chief justice
Court did not rule on a single case from 1801 to 1835 and dominated the
during its first three years. In spite of Court to a degree unmatched by any
this insignificant and abbreviated be- other justice. Marshall’s dominance of
ginning, Charles Warren wrote, “The the Court enabled him to initiate
New York and the Philadelphia news- major changes in the way opinions
papers described the proceedings of were presented. Prior to his tenure, the
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 25
review and determine the constitu- 1864. Although the Court’s position
tionality of acts of Congress was estab- during this period was not as uni-
lished. This decision is rightly seen as formly favorable to the federal govern-
one of the single most important deci- ment, the Taney Court did not reverse
sions the Supreme Court has ever the Marshall Court’s direction.
handed down. A few years later the During the period 1865-1937
Court also claimed the right of judicial issues of economic regulation domi-
review over actions of state legisla- nated the Court’s docket. The shift
tures; during Marshall’s tenure it over- in emphasis from federalism to
turned more than a dozen state laws economic regulation was brought on
on constitutional grounds. by a growing number of national
and state laws aimed at monitoring
The Changing Issue Emphasis of business activities. As such laws in-
the Supreme Court creased, so did the number of cases
Until approximately 1865 the legal challenging their constitutionality.
relationship between the national and Early in this period the Court’s
state governments, or cases of federal- position on regulation was mixed, but
ism, dominated the Court’s docket. by the 1920s the bench had become
John Marshall believed in a strong quite hostile toward government
national government and did not regulatory policy. Federal regulations
hesitate to restrict state policies that were generally overturned on the
interfered with its activities. A case ground that they were unsupported
in point is Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), by constitutional grants of power to
in which the Court overturned a state Congress, whereas state laws were
monopoly over steamboat transporta- thrown out mainly as violations of
tion on the ground that it interfered economic rights protected by the
with national control over interstate Fourteenth Amendment.
commerce. Another good example of Since 1937 the Supreme Court has
Marshall’s use of the Court to expand focused on civil liberties concerns —
the federal government’s powers came in particular, the constitutional guar-
in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), in antees of freedom of expression and
which the chief justice held that freedom of religion. In addition, an
the Constitution permitted Congress increasing number of cases have dealt
to establish a national bank. The with procedural rights of criminal de-
Court’s insistence on a strong national fendants. Finally, the Court has decid-
government did not significantly di- ed a great number of cases concerning
minish after Marshall’s death. Roger equal treatment by the government of
Taney, who succeeded Marshall as racial minorities and other disadvan-
chief justice, served from 1836 to taged groups.
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 27
The Court’s term is divided into a.m. until noon and from 1:00 until
sittings of approximately two weeks 3:00 p.m. Because the procedure is not
each, during which it meets in open a trial or the original hearing of a case,
session and holds internal confer- no jury is assembled and no witnesses
ences, and recesses, during which the are called. Instead, the two opposing
justices work behind closed doors as attorneys present their arguments to
they consider cases and write opin- the justices. The general practice is to
ions. The 80 to 90 cases per term that allow 30 minutes for each side, al-
receive the Court’s full treatment fol- though the Court may decide that ad-
low a fairly routine pattern. ditional time is necessary. The Court
can normally hear four cases in one
Oral Argument. Oral arguments are day. Attorneys presenting oral argu-
generally scheduled on Monday ments are frequently interrupted with
through Wednesday during the sit- questions from the justices. The oral
tings. The sessions run from 10:00 argument is considered very impor-
30 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
The nine justices of the present U.S. Supreme Court are shown above. Seated, from left to
right: Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and John Paul Stevens; Chief Justice William
Renhquist; Associate Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy. Standing, left to
right: Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, and
Stephen Breyer.
tant by both attorneys and justices be- Prior to the Friday conference each
cause it is the only stage in the process justice is given a list of the cases that
that allows such personal exchanges. will be discussed. The conference be-
gins at about 9:30 or 10:00 a.m. and
The Conference. On Fridays preced- runs until 5:30 or 6:00 p.m. As the jus-
ing the two-week sittings the Court tices enter the conference room they
holds conferences; during sittings it shake hands and take their seats
holds conferences on Wednesday af- around a rectangular table. They meet
ternoon and all day Friday. At the behind locked doors, and no official
Wednesday meeting the justices dis- record is kept of the discussions. The
cuss the cases argued on Monday. At chief justice presides over the confer-
the Friday conference they discuss the ence and offers an opinion first in each
cases that were argued on Tuesday and case. The other justices follow in de-
Wednesday, plus any other matters scending order of seniority.
that need to be considered. The most A quorum for a decision on a case
important of these other matters are is six members; obtaining a quorum is
the certiorari petitions. seldom difficult. Cases are sometimes
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 31
decided by fewer than nine justices be- In most cases a single opinion does
cause of vacancies, illnesses, or non- obtain majority support, although few
participation resulting from possible rulings are unanimous. Those who
conflicts of interest. Supreme Court disagree with the opinion of the Court
decisions are made by a majority vote. are said to dissent. A dissent does not
In case of a tie the lower-court deci- have to be accompanied by an opinion;
sion is upheld. in recent years, however, it usually has
been. Whenever more than one justice
Opinion Writing. After a tentative dissents, each may write an opinion or
decision has been reached in confer- all may join in a single opinion.
ence, the next step is to assign the On occasion a justice will agree
Court’s opinion to an individual jus- with the Court’s decision but differ in
tice. The chief justice, if voting with his or her reason for reaching that
the majority, either writes the opinion conclusion. Such a justice may write
or assigns it to another justice who what is called a concurring opinion.
voted with the majority. When the An opinion labeled “concurring and
chief justice votes with the minority, dissenting” agrees with part of a Court
the most senior justice in the majority ruling but disagrees with other parts.
makes the assignment. Finally, the Court occasionally issues a
After the conference the justice per curiam opinion — an unsigned
who will write the Court’s opinion opinion that is usually quite brief.
begins work on an initial draft. Other Such opinions are often used when the
justices may work on the case by Court accepts the case for review but
writing alternative opinions. The com- gives it less than full treatment. For ex-
pleted opinion is circulated to justices ample, it may decide the case without
in both the majority and the minority benefit of oral argument and issue a
groups. The writer seeks to persuade per curiam opinion to explain the dis-
justices originally in the minority to position of the case.
change their votes, and to keep his or
her majority group intact. A bargain- THE U.S. COURTS OF
ing process occurs, and the wording of APPEALS
the opinion may be changed in order he courts of appeals receive
to satisfy other justices or obtain their
support. A deep division in the Court
makes it difficult to achieve a clear,
T less media coverage than the
Supreme Court, but they are
very important in the U.S. judicial
coherent opinion and may even result system. Considering that the Supreme
in a shift in votes or in another jus- Court hands down decisions with
tice’s opinion becoming the Court’s full opinions in only 80 to 90 cases
official ruling. each year, it is apparent that the
32 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
courts of appeals are the courts of Jefferson strongly opposed this action,
last resort for most appeals in the and Congress repealed it. The Circuit
federal court system. Court Act of 1802 restored circuit rid-
ing by Supreme Court justices and
Circuit Courts: 1789-1891 expanded the number of circuits.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 created However, the legislation allowed the
three circuit courts (courts of ap- circuit court to be presided over by a
peals), each composed of two justices single district judge. Such a change
of the Supreme Court and a district may seem slight, but it proved to be of
judge. The circuit court was to hold great importance. Increasingly, the
two sessions each year in each district district judges began to assume re-
within the circuit. The district judge sponsibility for both district and cir-
became primarily responsible for es- cuit courts. In practice, then, original
tablishing the circuit court’s workload. and appellate jurisdiction were both in
The two Supreme Court justices then the hands of the district judges.
came into the local area and partici- The next major step in the develop-
pated in the cases. This practice tend- ment of the courts of appeals did not
ed to give a local rather than national come until 1869, when Congress ap-
focus to the circuit courts. proved a measure that authorized the
The circuit court system was re- appointment of nine new circuit
garded from the beginning as unsatis- judges and reduced the Supreme
factory, especially by Supreme Court Court justices’ circuit court duty to
justices, who objected to the traveling one term every two years. Still, the
imposed upon them. Attorney Gener- High Court was flooded with cases be-
al Edmund Randolph and President cause there were no limitations on the
Washington urged relief for the right of appeal to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court justices. Congress
made a slight change in 1793 by alter- The Courts of Appeals: 1891 to the
ing the circuit court organization to Present
include only one Supreme Court On March 3, 1891, the Evarts Act was
justice and one district judge. In the signed into law, creating new courts
closing days of President John Adams’s known as circuit courts of appeals.
administration in 1801, Congress These new tribunals were to hear most
eliminated circuit riding by the of the appeals from district courts.
Supreme Court justices, authorized The old circuit courts, which had
the appointment of 16 new circuit existed since 1789, also remained.
judges, and greatly extended the juris- The new circuit court of appeals was
diction of the lower courts. to consist of one circuit judge, one
The new administration of Thomas circuit court of appeals judge, one
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 33
The courts of appeals review cases appealed from federal district courts. Above, Chief Judge
John M. Walker, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, left, administers the oath of
office to Barrington D. Parker, Jr., right, as a judge for the same court.
district judge, and a Supreme Court Appeals could still be made, but the
justice. Two judges constituted a quo- High Court would now have much
rum in these new courts. greater control over its own workload.
Following passage of the Evarts Act, Much of its former caseload was thus
the federal judiciary had two trial tri- shifted to the two lower levels of the
bunals: district courts and circuit federal judiciary.
courts. It also had two appellate tri- The next step in the evolution of
bunals: circuit courts of appeals and the courts of appeals came in 1911. In
the Supreme Court. Most appeals of that year Congress passed legislation
trial decisions were to go to the circuit abolishing the old circuit courts,
court of appeals, although the act which had no appellate jurisdiction
also allowed direct review in some and frequently duplicated the func-
instances by the Supreme Court. In tions of district courts.
short, creation of the circuit courts of Today the intermediate appellate
appeals released the Supreme Court tribunals are officially known as
from many petty types of cases. courts of appeals, but they continue to
34 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
be referred to colloquially as circuit whole, not just for the specific liti-
courts. There are now 12 regional gants. Civil liberties, reapportion-
courts of appeals, staffed by 179 au- ment, religion, and education cases
thorized courts of appeals judges. The provide good examples of the kinds of
courts of appeals are responsible for disputes that may affect all citizens.
reviewing cases appealed from federal There are two purposes of review in
district courts (and in some cases from the courts of appeals. The first is error
administrative agencies) within the correction. Judges in the various cir-
boundaries of the circuit. A specialized cuits are called upon to monitor the
appellate court came into existence in performance of federal district courts
1982 when Congress established the and federal agencies and to supervise
Federal Circuit, a jurisdictional rather their application and interpretation of
than a geographic circuit. national and state laws. In doing so,
the courts of appeals do not seek out
The Review Function of the Courts new factual evidence, but instead ex-
of Appeals amine the record of the lower court
Most of the cases reviewed by the for errors. In the process of correcting
courts of appeals originate in the fed- errors the courts of appeals also settle
eral district courts. Litigants disap- disputes and enforce national law.
pointed with the lower-court decision The second function is sorting out
may appeal the case to the court of and developing those few cases worthy
appeals of the circuit in which the fed- of Supreme Court review. The circuit
eral district court is located. The ap- judges tackle the legal issues earlier
pellate courts have also been given than the Supreme Court justices and
authority to review the decisions of may help shape what they consider re-
certain administrative agencies. view-worthy claims. Judicial scholars
Because the courts of appeals have have found that appealed cases often
no control over which cases are differ in their second hearing from
brought to them, they deal with both their first.
routine and highly important matters.
At one end of the spectrum are frivo- The Courts of Appeals as Policy
lous appeals or claims that have no Makers
substance and little or no chance for The Supreme Court’s role as a policy
success. At the other end of the spec- maker derives from the fact that it
trum are the cases that raise major interprets the law, and the same
questions of public policy and evoke holds true for the courts of appeals.
strong disagreement. Decisions by the The scope of the courts of appeals’
courts of appeals in such cases are like- policy-making role takes on added
ly to establish policy for society as a importance, given that they are the
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 35
courts of last resort in the vast major- involving the Fifth Circuit. For several
ity of cases. years the University of Texas Law
As an illustration of the far- School (as well as many other law
reaching impact of circuit court schools across the country) had been
judges, consider the decision in a case granting preference to African Ameri-
can and Mexican American
applicants to increase the
enrollment of minority stu-
dents. This practice was
challenged in a federal dis-
trict court on the ground
that it discriminated
against white and nonpre-
ferred minority applicants
in violation of the Four-
teenth Amendment. On
March 18, 1996, a panel of
Fifth Circuit judges ruled in
Hopwood v. Texas that the
Fourteenth Amendment
does not permit the school
to discriminate in this way
and that the law school may
not use race as a factor in
law school admissions. The
U.S. Supreme Court denied
a petition for a writ of
certiorari in the case,
thus leaving it the law
of the land in Texas,
Louisiana, and Mississippi,
the states comprising the
Fifth Circuit. Although it
may technically be true that
only schools in the Fifth
Circuit are affected by the
U.S. courts — both at the level of the Appeals Courts and,
in several instances, the Supreme Court — often settle ruling, an editorial in The
passionately contested issues such as affirmative action in National Law Journal indi-
higher education. cates otherwise, noting that
36 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
while some “might argue that Hop- three-judge panels, often sitting in dif-
wood’s impact is limited to three states ferent cities throughout the circuit.
in the South..., the truth is that across
the country law school (and other) En Banc Proceedings. Occasionally,
deans, fearing similar litigation, are different three-judge panels within the
scrambling to come up with an alter- same circuit may reach conflicting
native to affirmative action.” decisions in similar cases. To resolve
such conflicts and to promote circuit
The Courts of Appeals at Work unanimity, federal statutes provide for
The courts of appeals do not have the an “en banc” (Old French for high
same degree of discretion as the seat) procedure in which all the cir-
Supreme Court to decide whether to cuit’s judges sit together on a panel and
accept a case. Still, circuit judges have decide a case. The exception to this
developed methods for using their general rule occurs in the large Ninth
time as efficiently as possible. Circuit where assembling all the judges
becomes too cumbersome. There, en
Screening. During the screening banc panels normally consist of 11
stage the judges decide whether to give judges. The en banc procedure may
an appeal a full review or to dispose of also be used when the case concerns
it in some other way. The docket may an issue of extraordinary importance.
be reduced to some extent by consoli-
dating similar claims into single cases, Oral Argument. Cases that have sur-
a process that also results in a uniform vived the screening process and have
decision. In deciding which cases can not been settled by the litigants are
be disposed of without oral argument, scheduled for oral argument. Attor-
the courts of appeals increasingly rely neys for each side are given a short
on law clerks or staff attorneys. These amount of time (as little as 10 min-
court personnel read petitions and utes) to discuss the points made in
briefs and then submit recommenda- their written briefs and to answer
tions to the judges. As a result, many questions from the judges.
cases are disposed of without reaching
the oral argument stage. The Decision. Following the oral ar-
gument, the judges may confer briefly
Three-Judge Panels. Those cases and, if they are in agreement, may an-
given the full treatment are normally nounce their decision immediately.
considered by panels of three judges Otherwise, a decision will be an-
rather than by all the judges in the cir- nounced only after the judges confer
cuit. This means that several cases can at greater length. Following the con-
be heard at the same time by different ference, some decisions will be
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 37
with four each. Other than consistent- is thus established at this level. Subse-
ly honoring state lines, the organiza- quent appeals of the trial court deci-
tion of district constituencies appears sion focus on correcting errors rather
to follow no rational plan. Size and than on reconstructing the facts.
population vary widely from district The task of determining the facts in
to district. Over the years, a court was a case often falls to a jury, a group of
added for the District of Columbia, citizens from the community who
and several territories have been serve as impartial arbiters of the facts
served by district courts. There are and apply the law to the facts. The
now U.S. district courts serving the 50 Constitution guarantees the right to a
states, the District of Columbia, jury trial in criminal cases in the Sixth
Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Amendment and the same right in
and the Northern Mariana Islands. civil cases in the Seventh Amendment.
The original district courts were The right can be waived, however, in
each assigned one judge. With the which case the judge becomes the ar-
growth in population and litigation, biter both of questions of fact and of
Congress has periodically had to add matters of law. Such trials are referred
judges to most of the districts. The to as bench trials.
Federal Judgeship Act of 1990 created Two types of juries are associated
74 new district judgeships, bringing with federal district courts. The grand
the current total to 649. Today all jury is a group of men and women
districts have more than one judge; convened to determine whether there
the Southern District of New York, is probable cause to believe that a per-
which includes Manhattan and the son has committed the federal crime
Bronx, currently has 28 judges and is of which he or she has been accused.
thus the largest. Because each federal Grand jurors meet periodically to hear
district court is normally presided charges brought by the U.S. attorney.
over by a single judge, several trials Petit jurors are chosen at random
may be in session within the district at from the community to hear evidence
any given time. and determine whether a defendant in
a civil trial has liability or whether a
The District Courts as Trial Courts defendant in a criminal trial is guilty
Congress established the district or not guilty. Federal rules call for 12
courts as the trial courts of the federal jurors in criminal cases but permit
judicial system and gave them original fewer in civil cases. The federal district
jurisdiction over virtually all cases. courts generally use six-person juries
They are the only federal courts in in civil cases.
which attorneys examine and cross- Trial courts are viewed as engaging
examine witnesses. The factual record primarily in norm enforcement,
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 39
during a period of good behavior, or court for eight-year terms of office, al-
what amounts to life tenure. Because though they can be removed before
Article I (legislative court) judges have the expiration of the term for “good
no constitutional guarantee of good- cause.” Within guidelines set by the
behavior tenure, Congress may set Congress, the judges in each district
specific terms of office for them. In court establish the duties and respon-
sum, the constitutional courts have a sibilities of their magistrate judges.
greater degree of independence from The legislation permits a magistrate
the other two branches of government judge, with the consent of the involved
than the legislative courts. parties, to conduct all proceedings in a
jury or nonjury civil matter and enter
ADMINISTRATIVE AND a judgment in the case and to conduct
STAFF SUPPORT IN THE a trial of persons accused of misde-
FEDERAL JUDICIARY meanors (less serious offenses than
lthough judges are the most felonies) committed within the dis-
Holmes, who also adopted the prac- have a substantial amount of contact
tice of annually hiring honor gradu- with attorneys and witnesses. Law
ates of Harvard Law School as his clerks at this level may be involved in
clerks. When William Howard Taft, a the initial drafting of opinions.
former law professor at Yale, became At the appellate level, the law clerk
chief justice, he secured a new law becomes involved in a case first by
clerk annually from the dean of the researching the issues of law and fact
Yale Law School. Harlan Fiske Stone, presented by an appeal. The courts of
former dean of the Columbia Law appeals do not have the same discre-
School, joined the Court in 1925 and tion to accept or reject a case that the
made it his practice to hire a Colum- Supreme Court has, and they use cer-
bia graduate each year. tain screening devices to differentiate
Since these early beginnings there between cases that can be handled
has been a steady growth in the use of quickly and those that require more
law clerks by all federal courts. More time and effort. Law clerks are an inte-
than 2,000 law clerks now work for gral part of this screening process.
federal judges, and more than 600 A number of cases are scheduled
serve bankruptcy judges and U.S. for oral argument, and the clerk may
magistrate judges. In addition to the be called upon to assist the judge
law clerks hired by individual judges, in preparing for it. Intensive analysis
all appellate courts and some district of the record by judges prior to
courts hire staff law clerks who serve oral argument is not always possible.
the entire court. They seldom have time to do more
A law clerk’s duties vary according than scan pertinent portions of the
to the preferences of the judge for record called to their attention by
whom he or she works. They also vary law clerks.
according to the type of court. Law Once a decision has been reached
clerks for federal district judges often by an appellate court, the law clerk
serve primarily as research assistants. frequently participates in writing the
They spend a good deal of time exam- order that accompanies the decision.
ining the various motions filed in civil The clerk’s participation generally
and criminal cases. They review each consists of drafting a preliminary
motion, noting the issues and the po- opinion or order pursuant to the
sitions of the parties involved, then re- judge’s directions. A law clerk may
search important points raised in the also be asked to edit or check citations
motions and prepare written memo- (references to a statute, precedent-
randums for the judges. Because their setting case, or legal textbook, in a
work is devoted to the earliest stages brief or argument in court) in an
of the litigation process, they may opinion written by the judge.
42 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
The work of the law clerk for a sonnel records and collecting data
Supreme Court justice roughly on cases in the federal courts.
parallels that of a clerk in the other The Administrative Office also
appellate courts. Clerks play an indis- serves the Judicial Conference of the
pensable role in helping justices de- United States, the central administra-
cide which cases should be heard. At tive policy-making organization of the
the suggestion of Justice Lewis F. Pow- federal judicial system. In addition to
ell, Jr., in 1972, a majority of the providing statistical information to
Court’s members began to participate the conference’s many committees,
in a “certpool”; the justices pool their the Administrative Office acts as a
clerks, divide up all filings, and circu- reception center and clearinghouse
late a single clerk’s certiorari memo to for information and proposals direct-
all those participating in the pool. The ed to the Judicial Conference. The
memo summarizes the facts of the office also acts as liaison for both the
case, the questions of law presented, federal judicial system and the Judicial
and the recommended course of Conference, serving as advocate for
action — that is, whether the case the judiciary in its dealings with
should be granted a full hearing, Congress, the executive branch, pro-
denied, or dismissed. fessional groups, and the general
Once the justices have voted to hear public. Especially important is its
a case, the law clerks, like their coun- representative role before Congress
terparts in the courts of appeals, pre- where, along with concerned judges, it
pare bench memorandums that the presents the judiciary’s budget pro-
justices may use during oral argument. posals, requests for additional judge-
Finally, law clerks for Supreme Court ships, suggestions for changes in court
justices, like those who serve courts of rules, and other key measures.
appeals judges, help to draft opinions.
The Federal Judicial Center
Administrative Office of the U.S. The Federal Judicial Center, created in
Courts 1967, is the federal courts’ agency for
The administration of the federal continuing education and research. Its
judicial system as a whole is managed duties fall generally into three cate-
by the Administrative Office of the gories: conducting research on the
U.S. Courts. Since its creation in 1939 federal courts, making recommenda-
it has handled everything from tions to improve the administration
distributing supplies to negotiating and management of the federal
with other government agencies for courts, and developing educational
court accommodations in federal and training programs for personnel
buildings to maintaining judicial per- of the judicial branch.
CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 43
Since its inception, judges have filings alone have risen 43 percent
benefited from orientation sessions since 1993.
and other educational programs put In 1995, 50,072 appeals were filed
on by the Federal Judicial Center. In in one of the regional circuit courts.
recent years, magistrate judges, bank- This figure increased every year, to a
ruptcy judges, and administrative per- high of 60,847 appeals in 2003. How-
sonnel have also been the recipients of ever, the number of appeals terminat-
educational programs. The Federal Ju- ed by the courts of appeals has also
dicial Center’s extensive use of videos been steadily increasing, from 49,805
and satellite technology allows it to in 1995 to 56,586 in 2002.
reach large numbers of people. The overall caseload of the
Supreme Court is large by historical
FEDERAL COURT standards; there were 8,255 cases on
WORKLOAD the docket for the 2002 term. The
he workload of the courts is Supreme Court, however, has discre-
HISTORY
2
AND
ORGANIZATION
OF
STATE
JUDICIAL
SYSTEMS
Even prior to the Articles of Confeder- state’s most important public policies,
ation and the writing of the U.S. the state courts handle a wide variety
Constitution in 1787, the colonies, as of cases, and the number of cases
sovereign entities, already had written litigated annually in the state courts
constitutions. Thus, the development far exceeds those decided in the
of state court systems can be traced federal tribunals.
from the colonial period to the present.
The Colonial Period
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT During the colonial period, political
OF STATE COURTS power was concentrated in the hands
o two states are exactly alike of the governor appointed by the king
ment were not only taken over by leg- creditors. These differences were im-
islative bodies but also greatly re- portant because “out of this conflict
duced. The former colonists were not over legislative and judicial power...the
eager to see the development of a courts gradually emerged as an inde-
large, independent judiciary given that pendent political institution,” accord-
many of them harbored a distrust of ing to David W. Neubauer in America’s
lawyers and the common law. The Courts and the Criminal Justice System.
state legislatures carefully watched the
courts and in some instances removed
judges or abolished specific courts be-
cause of unpopular decisions.
Increasingly, a distrust of the judi-
ciary developed as courts declared leg-
islative actions unconstitutional.
Conflicts between legislatures and
judges, often stemming from opposing
interests, became more prominent.
Legislators seemed more responsive to
policies that favored debtors, whereas
courts generally reflected the views of
Attorney Edward Clancy, left, argues his case before his state’s “court of last resort,” the New
Hampshire State Supreme Court.
Washington State’s Supreme Court, like other state courts of last resort, follows procedures
similar to those of the U.S. Supreme Court. Here, defense attorney Roger Hunko makes
closing arguments in the penalty phase of a murder trial.
CHAPTER 2: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS 51
In most states these courts also In most instances these courts are
have an appellate function. They hear called courts of appeals, although
appeals in certain types of cases that other names are occasionally used.
originate in trial courts of limited ju- Most states have one court of appeals
risdiction. These appeals are often with statewide jurisdiction. The size
heard in a trial de novo or tried again of intermediate courts varies from
in the court of general jurisdiction. state to state. The court of appeals
General trial courts are usually di- in Alaska, for example, has only
vided into judicial districts or circuits. three judges. At the other extreme,
Although the practice varies by state, Texas has 80 courts of appeals judges.
the general rule is to use existing polit- In some states the intermediate ap-
ical boundaries, such as a county or a peals courts sit en banc, whereas in
group of counties, in establishing the other states they sit in permanent or
district or circuit. In rural areas the rotating panels.
judge may ride circuit and hold court
in different parts of the territory ac- Courts of Last Resort
cording to a fixed schedule. In urban Every state has a court of last resort.
areas, however, judges hold court in a The states of Oklahoma and Texas
prescribed place throughout the year. have two highest courts. Both states
In larger counties the group of judges have a supreme court with jurisdiction
may be divided into specializations. limited to appeals in civil cases and a
Some may hear only civil cases; others court of criminal appeals for criminal
try criminal cases exclusively. cases. Most states call their highest
The courts at this level have a vari- courts supreme courts; other designa-
ety of names. The most common are tions are the court of appeals (Mary-
district, circuit, and superior. The land and New York), the supreme
judges at this level are required by law judicial court (Maine and Massachu-
in all states to have law degrees. These setts), and the supreme court of
courts also maintain clerical help be- appeals (West Virginia). The courts of
cause they are courts of record. last resort range in size from three to
nine judges (or justices in some
Intermediate Appellate Courts states). They typically sit en banc and
The intermediate appellate courts are usually, although not necessarily, con-
relative newcomers to the state judicial vene in the state capital.
scene. Only 13 such courts existed in The highest courts have jurisdic-
1911, whereas 39 states had created tion in matters pertaining to state law
them by 1995. Their basic purpose is and are, of course, the final arbiters in
to relieve the workload of the state’s such matters. In states that have inter-
highest court. mediate appellate courts, the Supreme
52 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
New York and Maryland call their highest courts the “court of appeals.” Pictured left to right
are New York State Court of Appeals Judge George Bundy Smith, Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye,
and Judge Howard A. Levine, as they listen to arguments in a death penalty case.
Court’s cases come primarily from tion. Most state supreme courts also
these mid-level courts. In this situa- follow procedures similar to those of
tion the high court typically is allowed the U.S. Supreme Court. That is, when
to exercise discretion in deciding a case is accepted for review the
which cases to review. Thus, it is likely opposing parties file written briefs
to devote more time to cases that deal and later present oral arguments.
with the important policy issues of the Then, upon reaching a decision, the
state. When there is no intermediate judges issue written opinions explain-
court of appeals, cases generally go to ing that decision.
the state’s highest court on a mandato-
ry review basis. Juvenile Courts
In most instances, then, the state Americans are increasingly concerned
courts of last resort resemble the U.S. about the handling of cases involving
Supreme Court in that they have a juveniles, and states have responded to
good deal of discretion in determining the problem in a variety of ways. Some
which cases will occupy their atten- have established a statewide network
CHAPTER 2: HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS 53
State courts handle millions of cases a year, at times in facilities like the Berkeley County
Courthouse in Martinsburg, West Virginia, which some call “historic” or “charming” and
others describe as “inadequate.”
court clerk, who traditionally man- cases are awarded by ordinary state
aged the operations of a specific trial court juries.
courtroom, the modern court admin- The National Center for State
istrator may assist a presiding judge in Courts has compiled figures on the
running the entire courthouse. caseloads of state courts of last resort
and intermediate appellate courts in
STATE COURT WORKLOAD 1998. In all, some 261,159 mandatory
he lion’s share of the nation’s cases and discretionary petitions were
3
JURISDICTION
AND
POLICY-
MAKING
BOUNDARIES
Judges from the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court in Rochester, New
York, hear motion arguments. A dispute must be real and current before a court will agree to
accept it for adjudication.
These tribunals, like the district includes appeals from certain federal
courts, are the creations of Congress, administrative agencies and depart-
and their structure and functions have ments and also from independent reg-
varied considerably over time. ulatory commissions, such as the Secu-
Basically, Congress has granted the rities and Exchange Commission and
circuit courts appellate jurisdiction the National Labor Relations Board.
over two general categories of cases.
The first of these are ordinary civil and U.S. Supreme Court
criminal appeals from the federal trial The U.S. Supreme Court is the only
courts. In criminal cases the appellant federal court mentioned by name in
is the defendant because the govern- the Constitution, which spells out the
ment is not free to appeal a verdict of general contours of the High Court’s
not guilty. In civil cases the party that jurisdiction. Although the Supreme
lost in the trial court is usually the ap- Court is usually thought of as an appel-
pellant, but the winning party may late tribunal, it does have some general
appeal if it is not satisfied with the original jurisdiction. Probably the most
lower-court judgment. The second important subject of such jurisdiction
broad category of appellate jurisdiction is a suit between two or more states.
CHAPTER 3: JURISDICTION AND POLICY-MAKING BOUNDARIES 61
The High Court shares original ju- tionary action. Such a writ (which
risdiction (with the U.S. district must be supported by at least four jus-
courts) in certain cases brought by or tices) is an order from the Supreme
against foreign ambassadors or con- Court to a lower court demanding
suls, in cases between the United States that it send up a complete record of a
and a state, and in cases commenced case so that the Supreme Court can re-
by a state against citizens of another view it. Historically, the Supreme
state or another country. In situations Court has agreed to grant the petition
such as these, where jurisdiction is for a writ of certiorari in only a tiny
shared, the courts are said to have con- proportion of cases — usually less
current jurisdiction. Cases over which than 10 percent of the time, and in re-
the Supreme Court has original juris- cent years the number has been closer
diction are often important, but they to 1 percent.
do not constitute a sizable proportion Another method by which the
of the overall caseload. In recent years Supreme Court exercises its appellate
less than 1 percent of the High Court’s jurisdiction is certification. This pro-
docket consisted of cases heard on cedure is followed when one of the ap-
original jurisdiction. peals courts asks the Supreme Court
The U.S. Constitution declares that for instructions regarding a question
the Supreme Court “shall have appel- of law. The justices may choose to give
late Jurisdiction...under such Regula- the appellate judges binding instruc-
tions as the Congress shall make.” tions, or they may ask that the entire
Over the years Congress has passed record be forwarded to the Supreme
much legislation setting forth the Court for review and final judgment.
“Regulations” determining which
cases may appear before the nation’s JURISDICTION AND POLICY
most august judicial body. Appeals MAKING OF STATE COURTS
may reach the Supreme Court through he jurisdictions of the 50 sepa-
two main avenues. First, there may be
appeals from all lower federal consti-
tutional and territorial courts and also
T rate state court systems in the
United States are established in
virtually the same manner as those
from most, but not all, federal legisla- within the national court system. Each
tive courts. Second, the Supreme state has a constitution that sets forth
Court may hear appeals from the the authority and decision-making
highest court in a state — as long as powers of its trial and appellate
there is a substantial federal question. judges. Likewise, each state legislature
Most of the High Court’s docket passes laws that further detail the spe-
consists of cases in which it has agreed cific powers and prerogatives of judges
to issue a writ of certiorari — a discre- and the rights and obligations of those
62 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
who bring suit in the state courts. Be- these cases, state supreme courts in-
cause no two state constitutions or validated their state’s method of fi-
legislative bodies are alike, the juris- nancing education, thus requiring the
dictions of individual state courts vary reallocation of billions of dollars.
from one state to another.
State courts are extremely impor- JURISDICTION AND
tant in terms of policy making in the LEGISLATIVE POLITICS
United States. Well over 99 percent of ome judges and judicial scholars
the judicial workload in the United
States consists of state, not federal,
cases, and 95 percent of all judges in
S argue that the U.S. Constitution
and the respective state docu-
ments confer a certain inherent juris-
the United States work at the state diction upon the judiciaries in some
level. Moreover, the decisions of state key areas, independent of the legisla-
jurists frequently have a great impact tive will. Nevertheless, the jurisdic-
on public policy. For example, during tional boundaries of American courts
the 1970s a number of suits were are also a product of legislative judg-
brought into federal court challenging ments — determinations often influ-
the constitutionality of a state’s enced by politics.
spending vastly unequal sums on the Congress may advance a particular
education of its schoolchildren. (This cause by giving courts the authority
occurred because poorer school dis- to hear cases in a public policy realm
tricts could not raise the same amount that previously had been forbidden
of money as could wealthy school dis- territory for the judiciary. For exam-
tricts.) The litigants claimed that chil- ple, when Congress passed the Civil
dren in the poorer districts were Rights Act of 1968, it gave judges the
victims of unlawful discrimination in authority to penalize individuals who
violation of their equal protection interfere with “any person because of
rights under the U.S. Constitution. his race, color, religion or national
The Supreme Court said they were origin and because he is or has
not, however, in a five-to-four deci- been...traveling in...interstate com-
sion in San Antonio Independent merce.” Prior to 1968 the courts had
School District v. Rodriguez (1973). But no jurisdiction over incidents that
the matter did not end there. Litiga- stemmed from interference by one
tion was instituted in many states person with another’s right to travel.
arguing that unequal educational op- Likewise, Congress may discourage a
portunities were in violation of vari- particular social movement by passing
ous clauses in the state constitutions. legislation to make it virtually impos-
Since Rodriguez such suits have been sible for its advocates to have any
brought 28 times in 24 states. In 14 of success in the courts.
CHAPTER 3: JURISDICTION AND POLICY-MAKING BOUNDARIES 63
parties would render a case moot in must avoid and a situation where a de-
most tribunals. However, sometimes claratory judgment is in order, in the
judges may decide that it is necessary real world the line between the two is
to hear a case, even though the status often a difficult one for jurists to draw.
of the facts and parties would seem to
have radically altered. Examples in- A Plea Must Be Specific
clude cases where someone has chal- Another constraint upon the federal
lenged a state’s refusal to permit an judiciary is that judges will hear no
abortion or to permit the life-support case on the merits unless the petition-
system of a terminally ill person to be er is first able to cite a specific part of
switched off. (In such cases, by the the Constitution as the basis of the
time the suit reaches an appellate plea. For example, the First Amend-
court, the woman may already have ment forbids government from mak-
given birth or the moribund person ing a law “respecting an establishment
may have died.) In these cases judges of religion.” In 1989 the state of New
have believed that the issues were so York created a special school district
important that they needed to be ad- solely for the benefit of the Satmar
dressed by the court. To declare such Hasids, a group of Hasidic Jews with
cases moot would, practically speak- East European roots that strongly re-
ing, prevent them from ever being sists assimilation into modern society.
heard in time by an appellate body. Most of the children attended
Although federal judges do not rule parochial schools in the Village of
on abstract, hypothetical issues, many Kiryas Joel, but these private schools
state courts are permitted to do so in weren’t able to accommodate retarded
some form or other. Federal legislative and disabled students, and the Satmars
courts may give advisory opinions as claimed that such children within
well. Also, American judges are their community would be trauma-
empowered to render declaratory tized if forced to attend a public
judgments, which define the rights of school. Responding to this situation,
various parties under a statute, a will, the state legislature created a special
or a contract. The judgments do not district encompassing a single school
entail any type of coercive relief. The that served only handicapped children
federal courts were given the authority from the Hasidic Jewish community.
to act in this capacity in the Federal This arrangement was challenged by
Declaratory Judgment Act of 1934, the association representing New York
and about three-fourths of the states state’s school boards. In June 1994 the
grant their courts this power. Al- U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the cre-
though a difference exists between an ation of the one-school district effec-
abstract dispute that the federal courts tively delegated political power to the
CHAPTER 3: JURISDICTION AND POLICY-MAKING BOUNDARIES 65
Congress has said that federal district courts have jurisdiction in federal civil and criminal cases.
In this photo, Justice Department lead attorney David Boies, left, and Connecticut Attorney
General Richard Blumenthal, right, discuss the Microsoft Windows 98 case with the media.
CHAPTER 3: JURISDICTION AND POLICY-MAKING BOUNDARIES 67
orthodox Jewish group and therefore farmer has long been a member of a
violated the First Amendment’s ban program under which he agreed to
on governmental “establishment of re- take part of his land out of production
ligion.” Whether or not everyone and periodically was paid a subsidy by
agrees that the New York law was con- the federal government. After years as
stitutional, few, if any, would doubt a participant, the farmer learns that a
that the school board association met neighbor is also drawing regular pay-
the specific criteria for securing judi- ments for letting all of his farmland lie
cial review: The Constitution clearly fallow. The idea that the neighbor is
forbids the government from delegat- getting something for nothing offends
ing political power to a specific reli- the farmer, and he questions the pro-
gious entity. The government here gram’s constitutionality. The farmer
readily acknowledged that it had challenges the legality of the program
passed a law for the unique benefit of in the local federal district court. As
a singular religious community. soon as it is brought to the judge’s at-
However, if one went into court tention that the farmer had himself
and contended that a particular law or been a member of the program and
official action “violated the spirit of had gained financially from it, the suit
the Bill of Rights” or “offended the val- is dismissed: One may not benefit
ues of the Founders,” a judge surely from a particular governmental en-
would dismiss the proceeding. For if deavor or official action and subse-
judges were free to give concrete, sub- quently attack it in court.
stantive meaning to vague generalities
such as these, there would be little Appellate Courts Rule on Legal —
check on what they could do. In the Not Factual — Questions
real world this principle is not as sim- A working proposition of state and
ple and clear-cut as it sounds, because federal appellate court practice is that
the Constitution contains many claus- these courts will generally not hear
es that are open to a wide variety of in- cases if the grounds for appeal are
terpretations, giving federal judges that the trial judge or jury wrongly
sufficient room to maneuver and amassed and identified the basic
make policy. factual elements of the case. It is not
that trial judges and juries always
Beneficiaries May Not Sue do a perfect job of making factual
A third aspect of judicial self-restraint determinations. Rather, there is the
is that a petitioner who has been the belief that they are closer to the actual
beneficiary of a law or an official ac- parties and physical evidence of the
tion may not subsequently challenge case, and, therefore, they will do a
that law. For example, suppose that a much better job of making factual
68 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
have differed in the way they have In all, despite the inevitable intru-
responded to this question. The Con- sion of judges’ personal values into
stitution guarantees a person accused their interpretation of many portions
of a crime the right to a defense attor- of the Constitution, virtually every
ney. But does this right continue if jurist subscribes to the general
one appeals a guilty verdict and, if so, principle that laws can be invalidated
for how many appeals? Strict con- only if they offend the Constitution
structionists and loose construction- — not the personal preferences of
ists have responded differently to the judges.
these queries.
C H A P T E R
4
LAWYERS,
LITIGANTS,
AND INTEREST
GROUPS IN THE
JUDICIAL
PROCESS
This chapter focuses on three crucial Those who aspired to the law during
actors in the judicial process: lawyers, this period generally performed a
litigants, and interest groups. Judges in clerkship or apprenticeship with an
the United States make decisions only established lawyer.
in the context of cases that are brought After the American Revolution
to the courts by individuals or groups (1775-83), the number of lawyers in-
who have some sort of disagreement creased rapidly, because neither legal
or dispute with each other. These ad- education nor admission to the bar
versaries, commonly called litigants, was very strict. The apprenticeship
sometimes argue their own cases in method continued to be the most
such minor forums as small claims popular way to receive legal training,
courts, but they are almost always rep- but law schools began to come into ex-
resented by lawyers in the more im- istence. The first law schools grew out
portant judicial arenas. Following an of law offices that specialized in train-
examination of the legal profession, ing clerks or apprentices. The earliest
the chapter discusses the role of indi- such school was the Litchfield School
vidual litigants and interest groups in in Connecticut, founded in 1784. This
the judicial process. school, which taught by the lecture
method, placed primary emphasis on
LAWYERS AND THE LEGAL commercial law. Eventually, a few col-
PROFESSION leges began to teach law as part of their
he training of attorneys and the general curriculum, and in 1817 an in-
The large national law firms employ associates, librarians, and paralegals to help partners
with a myriad of tasks, such as research.
CHAPTER 4: LAWYERS, LITIGANTS, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 77
ent, and thus they tend to be major the legal division handles the multi-
corporations rather than individuals. tude of legal problems faced by the
However, many of these large national modern corporation. For example,
firms often provide “pro bono” (Latin the legal division monitors the compa-
for “the public good,” or free) legal ny’s personnel practices to ensure
services to further civil rights, civil compliance with federal and state
liberties, consumer interests, and envi- regulations concerning hiring and re-
ronmental causes. moval procedures. The corporation’s
The large national firms consist of attorneys may advise the board of
partners and associates. Partners own directors about such things as contrac-
the law firm and are paid a share of tual agreements, mergers, stock sales,
the firm’s profits. The associates are and other business practices. The
paid salaries and in essence work company lawyers may also help edu-
for the partners. These large firms cate other employees about the laws
compete for the best graduates from that apply to their specific jobs and
the nation’s law schools. The most make sure that they are in compliance
prestigious firms have 250 or more with them. The legal division of a large
lawyers and also employ hundreds company also serves as a liaison with
of other people as paralegals (non- outside counsel.
lawyers who are specially trained to Most of the nation’s lawyers work
handle many of the routine aspects of in a lower hemisphere of the legal pro-
legal work), administrators, librarians, fession in terms of prestige and do not
and secretaries. command the high salaries associated
A notch below those working with large national law firms and
in the large national firms are those major corporations. However, they are
employed as attorneys by large engaged in a wider range of activities
corporations. Many corporations and are much more likely to be found,
use national law firms as outside day in and day out, in the courtrooms
counsel. Increasingly, however, corpo- of the United States. These are the at-
rations are hiring their own salaried torneys who represent clients in per-
attorneys as in-house counsel. The sonal injury suits, who prosecute and
legal staff of some corporations rivals defend persons accused of crimes,
those of private firms in size. Further, who represent husbands and wives in
these corporations compete with divorce proceedings, who help people
the major law firms for the best law conduct real estate transactions, and
school graduates. who help people prepare wills, to
Instead of representing the corpo- name just a few activities.
ration in court (a task usually handled Attorneys who work for the gov-
by outside counsel when necessary), ernment are generally included in the
78 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
lower hemisphere. Some, such as the tant U.S. attorneys are formally ap-
U.S. attorney general and the solicitor pointed by the U.S. attorney general,
general of the United States, occupy although in practice they are chosen
quite prestigious positions, but many by the U.S. attorney for the district,
toil in rather obscure and poorly paid who forwards the selection to the
positions. A number of attorneys opt attorney general for ratification.
for careers as judges at the federal or Assistant U.S. attorneys may be fired
state level. by the attorney general.
Another distinction in terms of In their role as prosecutors, U.S.
specialization in the legal profession is attorneys have considerable discretion
that between plaintiffs and defense at- in deciding which criminal cases to
torneys. The former group initiates prosecute. They also have the authori-
lawsuits, whereas the latter group de- ty to determine which civil cases to
fends those accused of wrongdoing in try to settle out of court and which
civil and criminal cases. ones to take to trial. U.S. attorneys,
therefore, are in a very good position
Government Attorneys in the to influence the federal district court’s
Judicial Process docket. Also, because they engage
Government attorneys work at all lev- in more litigation in the district
els of the judicial process, from trial courts than anyone else, the U.S.
courts to the highest state and federal attorneys and their staffs are vital
appellate courts. participants in policy making in the
federal trial courts.
Federal Prosecutors. Each federal
judicial district has one U.S. attorney Prosecutors at the State Level.
and one or more assistant U.S. attor- Those who prosecute persons accused
neys. They are responsible for prose- of violating state criminal statutes
cuting defendants in criminal cases in are commonly known as district
the federal district courts and for de- attorneys. In most states they are
fending the United States when it is elected county officials; however, in
sued in a federal trial court. a few states they are appointed.
U.S. attorneys are appointed by the The district attorney’s office usually
president and confirmed by the employs a number of assistants who
Senate. Nominees must reside in the do most of the actual trial work. Most
district to which they are appointed of these assistant district attorneys are
and must be lawyers. They serve a recent graduates of law school, who
formal term of four years but can be gain valuable trial experience in these
reappointed indefinitely or removed at positions. Many later enter private
the president’s discretion. The assis- practice, often as criminal defense
CHAPTER 4: LAWYERS, LITIGANTS, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 79
attorneys. Others will seek to become Public Defenders. Often the person
district attorneys or judges after a charged with violating a state or feder-
few years. al criminal statute is unable to pay
The district attorney’s office has for the services of a defense attorney.
a great deal of discretion in the In some areas a government official
handling of cases. Given budget and known as a public defender bears the
personnel constraints, not all cases responsibility for representing indi-
can be afforded the same amount of gent defendants. Thus, the public de-
time and attention. Therefore, some fender is a counterpart of the prosecu-
cases are dismissed, others are not tor. Unlike the district attorney,
prosecuted, and still others are prose- however, the public defender is usual-
cuted vigorously in court. Most cases, ly appointed rather than elected.
however, are subject to plea bargain- In some parts of the country there
ing. This means that the district are statewide public defender systems;
attorney’s office agrees to accept the in other regions the public defender is
defendant’s plea of guilty to a reduced a local official, usually associated with
charge or to drop some charges a county government. Like the district
against the defendant in exchange for attorney, the public defender employs
pleas of guilty to others. assistants and investigative personnel.
In some areas, if a person charged with violating a state or federal criminal statute is unable to
pay for the services of a defense attorney — as happened with the defendant above, center,
facing the judge — a government official known as the public defender is responsible for
representing the defendant.
80 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
able training for law students. In addi- contests, may either be policy oriented
tion, many lawyers provide legal serv- or compensatory.”
ices “pro bono publico” (Latin for “for A classic example of private, or
the public good”) because they see it ordinary, compensation-oriented liti-
as a professional obligation. gation is when a person injured in an
automobile accident sues the driver of
LITIGANTS the other car in an effort to win mon-
n some cases taken before the
I
etary damages as compensation for
courts, the litigants are individu- medical expenses incurred. This type
als, whereas in other cases one or of litigation is personal and is not
more of the litigants may be a govern- aimed at changing governmental or
ment agency, a corporation, a union, business policies.
an interest group, or a university. Some private law cases, however,
What motivates a person or group are policy oriented or political in na-
to take a grievance to court? In crimi- ture. Personal injury suits and product
nal cases the answer to this question is liability suits may appear on the sur-
relatively simple. A state or federal face to be simply compensatory in na-
criminal statute has allegedly been vi- ture but may also be used to change
olated, and the government prosecutes the manufacturing or business prac-
the party charged with violating the tices of the private firms being sued.
statute. In civil cases the answer is not A case litigated in North Carolina
quite so easy. Although some persons provides a good example. The case
readily take their grievances to court, began in 1993 after a five-year-old girl
many others avoid this route because got stuck on the drain of a wading
of the time and expense involved. pool after another child had removed
Political scientist Phillip Cooper the drain cover. Such a powerful suc-
points out that judges are called upon tion was created that, before she could
to resolve two kinds of disputes: be rescued, the drain had sucked out
private law cases and public law most of her large and small intestines.
controversies. Private law disputes are As a result, the girl will have to spend
those in which one private citizen or about 11 hours per day attached to in-
organization sues another. In public travenous feeding tubes for the rest of
law controversies, a citizen or organi- her life. In 1997 a jury awarded the
zation contends that a government girl’s family $25 million in compensa-
agency or official has violated a right tory damages and, before the jury was
established by a constitution or to have considered punitive damages,
statute. In Hard Judicial Choices, the drain manufacturer and two other
Cooper writes that “legal actions, defendants settled the case for $30.9
whether public law or private law million. The plaintiff ’s attorney said
84 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
that the lawsuit revealed similar inci- Court. Ordinary compensatory litiga-
dents in other areas of the country and tion is often terminated early in the
presented a stark example of some- judicial process because the litigants
thing industry insiders knew but find it more profitable to settle their
others did not. Not only did the fami- dispute or accept the verdict of a
ly win its lawsuit, but the North Car- trial court. However, litigants in polit-
olina legislature also passed a law re- ical cases generally do little to advance
quiring multiple drains to prevent their policy goals by gaining victories
such injuries in the future. at the lower levels of the judiciary.
Most political or policy-oriented Instead, they prefer the more wide-
lawsuits, however, are public law con- spread publicity that is attached to a
troversies. That is, they are suits decision by an appellate tribunal.
brought against the government pri- Pursuing cases in the appellate courts
marily to stop allegedly illegal policies is expensive. Therefore, many lawsuits
or practices. They may also seek dam- that reach this level are supported in
ages or some other specific form of re- one way or another by interest groups.
lief. A case decided by the U.S.
Supreme Court, Lucas v. South Caroli- INTEREST GROUPS IN THE
na Coastal Council, provides a good ex- JUDICIAL PROCESS
ample. South Carolina’s Beachfront lthough interest groups are
Management Act forbade David H.
Lucas from building single-family
houses on two beachfront lots he
A probably better known for
their attempts to influence
legislative and executive branch
owned. A South Carolina trial court decisions, they also pursue their
ruled that Lucas was entitled to be policy goals in the courts. Some
compensated for his loss. The South groups have found the judicial branch
Carolina Supreme Court reversed the to be more receptive to their efforts
trial court decision, however, and than either of the other two branches
Lucas appealed to the U.S. Supreme of government. Interest groups that
Court. The High Court ruled in do not have the economic resources
Lucas’s favor, saying that if a property to mount an intensive lobbying effort
owner is denied all economically viable in Congress or a state legislature may
use of his or her property, a taking has find it much easier to hire a lawyer and
occurred and the Constitution requires find some constitutional or statutory
that he or she get compensation. provision upon which to base a court
Political or policy-oriented litiga- case. Likewise, a small group with few
tion is more prevalent in the appellate registered voters among its members
courts than in the trial courts and is may lack the political clout to exert
most common in the U.S. Supreme much influence on legislators and ex-
CHAPTER 4: LAWYERS, LITIGANTS, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 85
One of the most famous cases involving special interests was the 1925 “monkey trial,” where
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent Clarence Darrow, left, to defend biology
teacher John T. Scopes in his test of Tennessee’s law banning the teaching of
the theory of evolution. William Jennings Bryan, right, testified for the prosecution
as a Bible expert.
During the 1950s and 1960s, interest group lawyers such as Thurgood Marshall, then chief
counsel of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP),
successfully persuaded the courts to support African Americans’ struggle for their civil rights.
Marshall here is shown with one of his clients, Autherine Lucy, expelled within days of
becoming the first African American student to attend the University of Alabama, allegedly
“for her own safety” in response to threats.
86 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Abe Yoder, the Amish youth whose father, along with others of his faith, were charged
by the state of Wisconsin with failure to send their children to school until the age of 16, as
required by state law. In this freedom of religion case, interest groups came to the defense
of the parents.
88 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Jonas Yoder and others with failure to for the appellate courts, these attor-
send their children to school until the neys may simply be required to deal
age of 16 as required by state law. with the legal problems of their
Yoder and the others, members of the groups’ clientele.
Amish faith, believed that education During the civil rights movement
beyond the eighth grade led to the in the 1950s and 1960s, for example,
breakdown of the values they cher- public interest lawyers not only litigated
ished and to “worldly influences on major civil rights questions; they also
their children.” defended African Americans and civil
An organization known as the Na- rights workers who ran into difficul-
tional Committee for Amish Religious ties with the local authorities. These
Freedom (NCARF) came to the de- interest group attorneys, then, per-
fense of Yoder and the others. Follow- formed many of the functions of a
ing a decision against the Amish in the specialized legal aid society: They pro-
trial court, the NCARF appealed to a vided legal representation to those in-
Wisconsin circuit court, which upheld volved in an important movement for
the trial court’s decision. An appeal social change. Furthermore, they per-
was made to the Wisconsin Supreme formed the important function of
Court, which ruled in favor of the drawing attention to the plight of
Amish, saying that the compulsory African Americans by keeping cases
school attendance law violated the free before the courts.
exercise of religion clause of the First
Amendment. Wisconsin then ap- Amicus Curiae Briefs
pealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, Submission of amicus curiae briefs is
which on May 15, 1972, sustained the the easiest method by which interest
religious objection that the NCARF groups can become involved in cases.
had raised to the compulsory school This method allows a group to get its
attendance laws. message before the court even though
As these examples illustrate, inter- it does not control the case. Provided
est group involvement in litigation has it has the permission of the parties to
focused on cases concerning major the case or the permission of the
constitutional issues that have reached court, an interest group may submit
the Supreme Court. Because only a an amicus brief to supplement the ar-
small percentage of cases ever reaches guments of the parties. The filing of
the nation’s highest court, however, amicus briefs is a tactic used in appel-
most of the work of interest group late rather than trial courts, at both
lawyers deals with more routine work the federal and the state levels.
at the lower levels of the judiciary. Sometimes these briefs are aimed
Instead of fashioning major test cases at strengthening the position of one of
CHAPTER 4: LAWYERS, LITIGANTS, AND INTEREST GROUPS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 89
the parties in the case. When the solved. Amicus curiae briefs are often
Wisconsin v. Yoder case was argued filed in an attempt to persuade an ap-
before the U.S. Supreme Court, the pellate court to either grant or deny
cause of the Amish was supported by review of a lower-court decision. A
amicus curiae briefs filed by the study of the U.S. Supreme Court
General Conference of Seventh Day found that the presence of amicus
Adventists, the National Council of briefs significantly increased the
Churches of Christ in the United chances that the Court would give full
States, the Synagogue Council of treatment to a case.
America, the American Jewish Con- Unlike private interest groups,
gress, the National Jewish Commis- all levels of the government can sub-
sion on Law and Public Affairs, and mit amicus briefs without obtaining
the Mennonite Central Committee. permission. The solicitor general of
Sometimes friend-of-the-court the United States is especially impor-
briefs are used not to strengthen the tant in this regard, and in some
arguments of one of the parties but to instances the Supreme Court may
suggest to the court the group’s own invite the solicitor general to present
view of how the case should be re- an amicus brief.
C H A P T E R
5
THE
CRIMINAL
COURT
PROCESS
The criminal process begins when a few consist of sins of omission, such as
law is first broken and extends failing to stop and render aid after a
through the arrest, indictment, trial, traffic accident or failing to file an in-
and appeal. There is no single crimi- come tax return. The state considers
nal, or civil, court process in the some crimes serious, such as murder
United States. Instead, the federal and treason, and this seriousness is re-
system has a court process at the flected in the corresponding punish-
national level, and each state and terri- ments, such as life imprisonment or
tory has its own set of rules and regu- the death penalty. The state considers
lations that affect the judicial process. others crimes only mildly reprehensi-
Norms and similarities do exist among ble, such as double parking or disturb-
all of these governmental entities, ing the peace, and consequently
and the discussion will focus primarily punishments of a light fine or a night
on these, but no two states have iden- in the local jail are akin to an official
tical judicial systems and no state’s sys- slap on the wrist.
tem is identical to that of the national Some crimes, such as kidnapping
government. or rape, constitute actions that virtual-
ly all citizens consider outside the
THE NATURE AND sphere of acceptable human conduct,
SUBSTANCE OF CRIME whereas other crimes constitute ac-
n act is not automatically a tions about which opinion would be
offense for which the penalty may be often go hand in glove. For example,
death or imprisonment for a year or the thief who breaks into a house and
more. Thus, felonies are distinguished inadvertently confronts a resistant
in some states according to the place owner may harm the owner and thus
where the punishment occurs; in some be involved in more than just the
states and according to the federal property crime of burglary.
government, the length of the sentence The less numerous, but more
is the key factor. Examples of felonies feared, conventional crimes are those
include murder, forcible rape, and against the person. These crimes of
armed robbery. violence include murder and nonneg-
Misdemeanors are regarded as petty ligent manslaughter, forcible rape,
crimes by the state, and their punish- robbery, and aggravated assault.
ment usually consists of confinement
in a city or county jail for less than a Economic Crimes
year. Public drunkenness, small-time There are four broad categories of eco-
gambling, and vagrancy are common nomic crimes:
examples of misdemeanor offenses. • Personal crimes consist of nonviolent
Some states have a third category of criminal activity that one person
offense known as infractions. Often inflicts on another with the hope of
they include minor traffic offenses, monetary gain. Examples include
such as parking violations, and the intentionally writing a bad check,
penalty is usually a small fine. Fines cheating on one’s income tax, and
may also be part of the penalty for committing welfare fraud.
misdemeanors and felonies. • Abuse of trust occurs when business
or government employees violate
CATEGORIES OF CRIME their fidelity to their employer or
ive broad categories that com- clients and engage in practices such
actments. Custom and tradition often or clear-cut, and police officials pos-
account for the rest. Although the exact sess — and exercise — wide discretion
nature of these procedural events varies about whether to take someone into
from federal to state practice — and custody. Sufficient resources are sim-
from one state to another — there are ply not available to the police for them
similarities throughout the country. to proceed against all activities that
These procedures, however, are not as Congress and the legislatures have for-
automatic or routine as they might ap- bidden. Consequently, discretion must
pear; rather, the judicial system’s deci- be exercised in determining how to al-
sion makers exercise discretion at all locate the time and resources that do
stages according to their values, atti- exist. Police discretion is at a maxi-
tudes, and views of the world. mum in several areas.
inal, the police often decline to make police may detain an individual
an arrest. Such relationships include arrested without a warrant for up to
landlord and tenant, one neighbor 48 hours without a court hearing on
and another, and, until recently, whether the arrest was justified.
husband and wife. In this last case, This appearance in court is the oc-
however, heightened awareness of do- casion of several important events in
mestic violence has had a significant the criminal justice process. First, the
impact on police procedures. accused must have been informed of
Rape and child molestation consti- the precise charges and must be in-
tute another major category of crimes formed of all constitutional rights
for which there are often no arrests and guarantees. Among others, these
because the victims will not or cannot rights include those of the now fa-
cooperate with the police. Oftentimes mous Miranda v. Arizona decision
the victim is personally acquainted handed down in 1966 by the Supreme
with, or related to, the criminal, and Court. The accused “must be warned
the fear of reprisals or of ugly publicity prior to any questioning that he has
inhibits the victim from pressing the right to remain silent, that any-
a complaint. thing he says can be used against him
in a court of law, that he has the right
Victim Also Involved in Misconduct. to the presence of an attorney, and
When police officers perceive that the that if he cannot afford an attorney
victim of a crime is also involved in one will be appointed for him prior to
some type of improper or question- any questioning.” (Such warnings
able conduct, the officers frequently must also be given by the arresting of-
opt not to make an arrest. ficer if the officer questions the sus-
pect about the crime.) In some states
Appearance Before a Magistrate the accused must be informed about
After a suspect is arrested for a crime, other rights that are provided for in
he or she is booked at the police the state’s Bill of Rights, such as the
station; that is, the facts surrounding right to a speedy trial and the right to
the arrest are recorded and the confront hostile witnesses.
accused may be fingerprinted and Second, the magistrate will deter-
photographed. Next the accused mine whether the accused is to be re-
appears before a lower-level judicial leased on bail and, if so, what the
official whose title may be judge, amount of bail is to be. Constitution-
magistrate, or commissioner. Such an ally, the only requirement for the
appearance is supposed to occur amount is that it shall not be “exces-
“without unnecessary delay”; in 1991 sive.” Bail is considered to be a privi-
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that lege — not a right — and it may be
CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 99
Since 1966, police have had to advise suspects about their rights prior to any
interrogation. They use the so-called “Miranda Warning,” named after Ernesto
Miranda, who was granted a retrial because he was not advised about his rights.
100 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
mer jeopardy (having been tried on the never go to trial. That is because be-
same charge at another time), or “nolo fore the trial date a bargain has been
contendere” (from the Latin, no con- struck between the prosecutor and the
test). Nolo contendere means that the defendant’s attorney concerning the
accused does not deny the facts of the official charges to be brought and the
case but claims that he or she has not nature of the sentence that the state
committed any crime, or it may mean will recommend to the court. In effect,
that the defendant does not under- some form of leniency is promised in
stand the charges. The nolo contendere exchange for a guilty plea.
plea can be entered only with the con- Because plea bargaining virtually
sent of the judge (and sometimes the seals the fate of the defendant before
prosecutor as well). Such a plea has trial, the role of the judge is simply to
two advantages. It may help the ac- ensure that the proper legal and con-
cused save face vis-à-vis the public be- stitutional procedures have been fol-
cause he or she can later claim that lowed. There are three (not mutually
technically no guilty verdict was exclusive) types of plea bargains.
reached even though a sentence or a
fine may have been imposed. Also, the Reduction of Charges. The most
plea may spare the defendant from common form of agreement between
certain civil penalties that might fol- a prosecutor and a defendant is a
low a guilty plea (for example, a civil reduction of the charge to one less se-
suit that might follow from conviction rious than that supported by the evi-
for fraud or embezzlement). dence. This exposes the criminal to a
If the accused pleads not guilty, the substantially reduced range of sen-
judge will schedule a date for a trial. If tence possibilities. A second reason for
the plea is guilty, the defendant may be a defendant to plead guilty to a re-
sentenced on the spot or at a later date duced charge is to avoid a record of
set by the judge. Before the court will conviction for an offense that carries a
accept a guilty plea, the judge must social stigma. Another possibility is
certify that the plea was made volun- that the defendant may wish to avoid a
tarily and that the defendant was felony record altogether and would be
aware of the implications of the plea. willing to plead guilty to almost any
A guilty plea is to all intents and misdemeanor offered by the prosecu-
purposes the equivalent to a formal tor rather than face a felony charge.
verdict of guilty.
Deletion of Tangent Charges. A sec-
The Possibility of a Plea Bargain ond form of plea bargain is the agree-
At both the state and federal levels at ment of the district attorney to drop
least 90 percent of all criminal cases other charges pending against an indi-
102 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
vidual. There are two variations on presiding judge the discretion of al-
this theme. One is an agreement not to lowing all of the defendant’s sentences
prosecute “vertically” — that is, not to to run concurrently.
prosecute more serious charges filed
against the individual. The second Sentence Bargaining. A third form
type of agreement is to dismiss “hori- of plea bargaining concerns a plea of
zontal” charges; that is to dismiss ad- guilty from the defendant in exchange
ditional indictments for the same for a prosecutor’s agreement to ask the
crime pending against the accused. judge for a lighter sentence. The
Another variation of this type of strength of the sentence negotiation is
plea bargaining is the agreement in based upon the realities of the limited
which a repeater clause is dropped resources of the judicial system. At the
from an indictment. At the federal state level, at least, prosecutors are able
level and in many states, a person is to promise the defendant a fairly spe-
considered a habitual criminal upon cific sentence with confidence that the
the third conviction for a violent judge will accept the recommenda-
felony anywhere in the United States. tion. If the judge were not to do so, the
The mandatory sentence for the habit- prosecutor’s credibility would quickly
ual criminal is life imprisonment. In begin to wane, and many of the defen-
state courts the habitual criminal dants who had been pleading guilty
charge often is dropped in exchange would begin to plead not guilty and
for a plea of guilty. take their chances in court. The result
Another plea bargain of this type is would be a gigantic increase in court
the agreement in which indictments in dockets that would overwhelm the
different courts are consolidated into judicial system and bring it to a stand-
one court in order that the sentences still. Prosecutors and judges under-
may run concurrently. As indictments stand this reality, and so do the
or preliminary hearing rulings are defense attorneys.
handed down in many jurisdictions,
they are placed on a trial docket on a Constitutional and Statutory Re-
rotation system. This means that a de- strictions on Plea Bargaining. At
fendant charged with four counts of both the state and federal levels, the
forgery and one charge of possession requirements of due process of law
of a forged instrument might be mean that plea bargains must be made
placed on the docket of five different voluntarily and with comprehension.
courts. Generally it is common prac- This means that the defendant must
tice in such multicourt districts to be admonished by the court of the
transfer all of a person’s indictments consequences of a guilty plea (for ex-
to the first court listed. This gives the ample, the defendant waives all oppor-
CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 103
tunities to change his or her mind at a on the case, and because of personal
later date), that the accused must be interests or social pressures, the ac-
sane, and that, as one state puts it, “It cused may wish to avoid the length
must plainly appear that the defen- and publicity of a formal trial. Finally,
dant is uninfluenced by any consider- some penologists (professionals in the
ation of fear or by any persuasion, or field of punishment and rehabilita-
delusive hope of pardon prompting tion) argue that the first step toward
him to confess his guilt.” rehabilitation is for a criminal to
For the first two types of plea bar- admit guilt and to recognize his or
gains — reduction of charges and her problem.
deletion of tangent charges — some Plea bargaining also offers some
stricter standards govern the federal distinct advantages for the state and
courts. One is that the judge may not for society as a whole. The most
actually participate in the process of obvious is the certainty of conviction,
plea bargaining; at the state level because no matter how strong the
judges may play an active role in this evidence may appear, an acquittal is
process. Likewise, if a plea bargain has always a possibility as long as a trial is
been made between the U.S. attorney pending. Also, the district attorney’s
and the defendant, the government office and judges are saved an
may not renege on the agreement. If enormous amount of time and effort
the federal government does so, the by their not having to prepare
federal district judge must withdraw and preside over cases in which there
the guilty plea. Finally, the Federal is no real contention of innocence
Rules of Criminal Procedure require or that are not suited to the trial
that before a guilty plea may be ac- process. Finally, when police officers
cepted, the prosecution must present are not required to be in court testify-
a summary of the evidence against ing in criminal trials, they have more
the accused, and the judge must agree time to devote to preventing and
that there is strong evidence of the solving crimes.
defendant’s guilt. Plea bargains do have a negative
side as well. The most frequent objec-
Arguments For and Against Plea tion to plea bargaining is that the de-
Bargaining. For the defendant the fendant’s sentence may be based upon
obvious advantage of the bargain is nonpenological grounds. With the
that he or she is treated less harshly large volume of cases making plea bar-
than would be the case if the accused gaining the rule, the sentence often
were convicted and sentenced under bears no relation to the specific facts
maximum conditions. Also, the ab- of the case, to the correctional needs of
sence of a trial often lessens publicity the criminal, or to society’s legitimate
104 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
rules of evidence, but only after both limits, ultimately reaching 100 days,
sides have had a full opportunity to within which criminal charges must
present their case. either be brought to trial or dismissed.
Most states have similar measures on
PROCEDURES DURING A the statute books, although the precise
CRIMINAL TRIAL time period varies from one jurisdic-
ssuming that no plea bargain tion to another. By “public trial” the
or her fate will be determined by a The second goal that the opposing
jury. At the federal level 12 persons attorneys have in questioning pros-
must render a unanimous verdict. At pective jurors is to eliminate those
the state level such criteria apply only who they believe would be unfavor-
to the most serious offenses. In many able to their side even though no overt
states a jury may consist of fewer than reason is apparent for the potential
12 persons and render verdicts by bias. Each side is allowed a number of
other than unanimous decisions. peremptory challenges — requests to
A group of potential jurors is sum- the court to exclude a prospective
moned to appear in court. They are juror with no reason given. Most states
questioned in open court about their customarily give the defense more
general qualifications for jury service peremptory challenges than the prose-
in a process known as “voir dire” cution. At the federal level one to three
(from Old French, meaning “to say the challenges per jury are usually permit-
truth”). The prosecutor and the de- ted each side, depending on the nature
fense attorney ask general and specific of the offense; as many as 20 are al-
questions of the potential jurors. Are lowed in capital cases. The use of
they citizens of the state? Can they peremptory challenges is more of an
comprehend the English language? art than a science and is usually based
Have they or anyone in their family on the hunch of the attorneys.
ever been tried for a criminal offense? In the past attorneys were able to
Have they read about or formed any exclude potential jurors via the
opinions about the case at hand? peremptory challenge for virtually any
In conducting the voir dire, the state reason whatsoever. However, in recent
and the defense have two goals. The years the Supreme Court has inter-
first is to eliminate all members of the preted the Fourteenth Amendment’s
panel who have an obvious reason why equal protection clause to restrict this
they might not render an impartial de- discretion by prohibiting prosecutors
cision in the case. Common examples from using their challenges to exclude
might be someone who is excluded by African Americans or women from
law from serving on a jury, a juror who serving on a criminal jury.
is a friend or relative of a participant in The process of questioning and
the trial, and someone who openly ad- challenging prospective jurors contin-
mits a strong bias in the case at hand. ues until all those duly challenged for
Objections to jurors in this category are cause are eliminated, the peremptory
known as challenges for cause, and the challenges are either used up or
number of such challenges is unlimit- waived, and a jury of 12 (six in some
ed. It is the judge who determines states) has been created. In some states
whether these challenges are valid. alternate jurors are also chosen. They
108 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
attend the trial but participate in de- witnesses. The physical evidence may
liberations only if one of the original include things such as bullets, ballistics
jurors is unable to continue in the pro- tests, fingerprints, handwriting sam-
ceedings. Once the panel has been se- ples, blood and urine tests, and other
lected, they are sworn in by the judge documents or items that serve as phys-
or the clerk of the court. ical aids. The defense may object to the
admission of any of these tangible
Opening Statements items and will, if successful, have the
After the formal trial begins, both the item excluded from consideration. If
prosecution and the defense make an defense challenges are unsuccessful,
opening statement (although in no the physical evidence is labeled by one
state is the defense compelled to do of the courtroom personnel and be-
so). Long and detailed statements are comes part of the official record.
more likely to be made in jury trials Most evidence at criminal trials
than in bench trials. The purpose of takes the form of testimony of wit-
opening statements is to provide nesses. The format is a question-and-
members of the jury — who lack answer procedure whose purpose is to
familiarity with the law and with elicit very specific information in an
procedures of criminal investigation orderly fashion. The goal is to present
— with an outline of the major objec- only evidence that is relevant to the
tives of each side’s case, the evidence immediate case at hand and not to
that is to be presented, the witnesses give confusing or irrelevant informa-
that are to be called, and what each tion or illegal evidence that might
side seeks to prove. If the opening result in a mistrial (for example,
statements are well presented, the ju- evidence that the accused had a prior
rors will find it easier to grasp the conviction for an identical offense).
meaning and significance of the After each witness the defense at-
evidence and testimony. The usual torney has the right to cross-examine.
procedure is for the state to make its The goal of the defense will be to im-
opening statement first and for the de- peach the testimony of the prosecu-
fense to follow with a statement about tion witness — that is, to discredit it.
how it will refute that case. The attorney may attempt to confuse,
fluster, or anger the witness, causing
The Prosecution’s Case him or her to lose self-control and
After the opening statements the pros- begin providing confusing or conflict-
ecutor presents the evidence amassed ing testimony. A prosecution witness’
by the state against the accused. Evi- testimony may also be impeached if
dence is generally of two types — defense witnesses who contradict the
physical evidence and the testimony of version of events suggested by the state
CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 109
are subsequently presented. Upon cused faces the same risks of cross-
completion of the cross-examination, examination as any other witness.)
the prosecutor may conduct a redirect After the defense has rested its case,
examination, which serves to clarify or the prosecution has the right to
correct some telling point made dur- present rebuttal evidence. In turn, the
ing the cross-examination. After the defense may offer a rejoinder known
state has presented all its evidence and as a surrebuttal. After that, each side
witnesses, it rests its case. delivers closing arguments. Often-
times this is one of the more dramatic
The Case for the Defense episodes in the trial because each side
The presentation of the case for the seeks to sum up its case, condense its
defense is similar in style and format strongest arguments, and make one
to that of the prosecution. Tangible ev- last appeal to the jury. New evidence
idence is less common in the defense’s may not be presented at this stage, and
case, and most of the evidence will be the arguments of both sides tend to
that of witnesses who are prepared to ring with emotion and appeals to val-
rebut or contradict the prosecution’s ues that transcend the immediate case.
arguments. The witnesses are ques- The prosecutor may talk about the
tioned by the defense attorney in the crime problem in general, about the
same style as those in the prosecution need for law and order, and about the
case. Each defense witness may in turn need not to let compassion for the ac-
be cross-examined by the district at- cused get in the way of empathy for
torney, and then a redirect examina- the crime victim. The defense attor-
tion is in order. ney, on the other hand, may remind
The difference between the case for the jurors “how we have all made mis-
the prosecution and the case for the takes in this life” or argue that in a free,
defense lies in their obligation before democratic society any doubt they
the law. The defense is not required by have should be resolved in favor of the
law to present any new or additional accused. The prosecution probably
evidence or any witnesses at all. The avoids emotionalism more than the
defense may consist merely of chal- defense attorney, however, because
lenging the credibility or the legality of many jury verdicts have been reversed
the state’s evidence and witnesses. The on appeal after the district attorney in-
defense is not obligated to prove the jected prejudicial statements into the
innocence of the accused; it need show closing statements.
only that the state’s case is not beyond
a reasonable doubt. The defendant Role of the Judge During the Trial
need not even take the stand. (Howev- The judge’s role in the trial, although
er, if he or she elects to do so, the ac- very important, is a relatively passive
110 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Prosecutors and police display a seizure of more than $45 million worth of heroin and
cocaine. Illegal drug traffic belongs under either one of two categories of crime:
organized crime and consensual crime, also known as victimless crime, because both
the perpetrator and the client desire the forbidden activity.
one. He or she does not present any are about equally strong or on a
evidence or take an active part in the point of law that is open to a variety
examination of the witnesses. The of interpretations.
judge is called upon to rule on the
many motions of the prosecutor and Role of the Jury During the Trial
of the defense attorney regarding the The jurors’ role during the trial is pas-
types of evidence that may be present- sive. Their job is to listen attentively to
ed and the kinds of questions that the cases presented by the opposing
may be asked of the witnesses. In attorneys and then come to a decision
some jurisdictions the judge is per- based solely on the evidence that is set
mitted to ask substantive questions of forth. They are ordinarily not permit-
the witnesses and also to comment to ted to ask questions either of the wit-
the jury about the credibility of the nesses or of the judge, nor are they
evidence that is presented; in other allowed to take notes of the proceed-
states the judge is constrained from ings. This is not because of constitu-
such activity. Still, the American legal tional or statutory prohibitions but
tradition has room for a variety of primarily because it has been the tra-
judicial styles that depend on the per- ditional practice of courts in America.
sonality, training, and wisdom of indi- In recent years, however, many
vidual judges. judges have allowed jurors to become
First and foremost, the judge is ex- more involved in the judicial arena.
pected to play the part of a disinterest- Chicago’s Chief U.S. District Court
ed party whose primary job is to see to Judge John F. Grady has for over a
it that both sides are allowed to decade permitted jurors in his court-
present their cases as fully as possible room to take notes. At least four U.S.
within the confines of the law. If appellate courts have given tacit ap-
judges depart from the appearance or proval to the practice of juror partici-
practice of being fair and neutral par- pation in questioning witnesses, as
ties, they run counter to fundamental long as jurors are not permitted to
tenets of American jurisprudence and blurt out queries in the midst of trial
risk having their decisions overturned and attorneys are given a chance to
by an appellate court. object to specific questions before
Although judges do for the most they are posed to witnesses. In some
part play such a role, the backgrounds states a few trial judges have allowed
and values of the jurists also affect jurors to take fairly active roles in the
their decisions in the close calls — trial. Still, at both state and federal lev-
when they are called upon to rule on els the role of the jury remains basi-
a motion for which the arguments cally passive.
112 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Instructions to the Jury if there are more than one, who must
Although the jury’s job is to weigh and sign the official documents that ex-
assess the facts of the case, the judge press the verdict of the jury. After
must instruct the jurors about the the instructions are read to the jury
meaning of the law and how the law is (and the attorneys for each side have
to be applied. Because many cases are been given an opportunity to offer
overturned on appeal as a result of objections), the jurors retreat into a
faulty jury instructions, judges tend to deliberation room to decide the fate
take great care that the wording be of the accused.
technically and legally correct.
All jury instructions must have The Jury’s Decision
some basic elements. One is to define The jury deliberates in complete
for the jurors the crime with which privacy; no outsiders observe or par-
the accused is charged. This may in- ticipate in its debate. During their
volve giving the jurors a variety of op- deliberation jurors may request the
tions about what kind of verdict to clarification of legal questions from
bring. For example, if one person has the judge, and they may look at items
taken the life of another, the state may of evidence or selected segments of the
be trying the accused for first-degree case transcript, but they may consult
murder. Nevertheless, the judge may nothing else — no law dictionaries, no
be obliged to acquaint the jury with legal writings, no opinions from ex-
the legal definition of second-degree perts. When it has reached a decision
murder or manslaughter if it should by a vote of its members, the jury re-
determine that the defendant was the turns to the courtroom to announce
killer but did not act with malice its verdict. If it has not reached a deci-
aforethought. sion by nightfall, the jurors are sent
The judge must also remind the home with firm instructions neither
jury that the burden of proof is on the to discuss the case with others nor
state and that the accused is presumed read about the case in the newspapers.
to be innocent. If, after considering In very important or notorious cases,
all the evidence, the jury still has a the jury may be sequestered by the
reasonable doubt as to the guilt of judge, which means that its members
the accused, it must bring in a not will spend the night in a local hotel
guilty verdict. away from the public eye.
Finally, the judge usually acquaints If the jury becomes deadlocked
the jurors with a variety of procedural and cannot reach a verdict, it may re-
matters: how to contact the judge if port that fact to the judge. In such an
they have questions, the order in event the judge may insist that the
which they must consider the charges jury continue its effort to reach a ver-
CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 113
Defendants in the
photos to the left and
above are shown
awaiting the jury’s
verdict and listening
to the judge’s
announcement of the
verdict. Once the verdict
is reached, the judge
has several weeks to
determine the penalty,
based on the principle
that the punishment
should fit the crime.
Bottom left, a prisoner
is led back to his cell.
114 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
dict. Or, if the judge is convinced that that is, that each juror be asked indi-
the jury is in fact hopelessly dead- vidually if the general verdict actually
locked, he or she may dismiss the jury reflects his or her own opinion. The
and call for a new trial. purpose is to determine whether each
Research studies indicate that most juror supports the overall verdict or
juries dealing with criminal cases whether he or she is just caving in to
make their decisions fairly quickly. Al- group pressure. If the polling proce-
most all juries take a vote soon after dure reveals that the jury is indeed not
they retire to their chambers in order of one mind, it may be sent back to the
to see how divided, or united, they are. jury room to continue deliberations;
In 30 percent of the cases it takes only in some jurisdictions a mistrial may
one vote to reach a unanimous deci- be declared. If a mistrial is declared,
sion. In 90 percent of the remainder, the case may be tried again before
the majority on the first ballot eventu- another jury. There is no double jeop-
ally wins out. Hung juries — those in ardy because the original jury did not
which no verdict can be reached — agree on a verdict. If the jury’s verdict
tend to occur only when a large mi- is not guilty, the defendant is dis-
nority existed on the first ballot. charged on the spot and is free to leave
Scholars have also learned that ju- the courtroom.
ries often reach the same verdict that
the judge would have, had he or she PROCEDURES AFTER A
been solely responsible for the deci- CRIMINAL TRIAL
sion. One large jury study asked judges t the close of the criminal trial,
to state how they would have decided
jury cases over which they presided.
The judge and jury agreed in 81 per-
A generally two stages remain
for the defendant if he or she
has been found guilty: sentencing and
cent of the criminal cases (about the an appeal.
same as in civil cases). In 19 percent of
the criminal cases the judge and jury Sentencing
disagreed, with the judge showing a Sentencing is the court’s formal pro-
marked tendency to convict where the nouncement of judgment upon the
juries had acquitted. defendant at which time the punish-
When the members of the jury do ment or penalty is set forth.
finally reach a decision, they return to At the federal level and in most
the courtroom and their verdict is an- states, sentences are imposed by the
nounced in open court, often by the judge only. However, in several states
jury foreman. At this time either the the defendant may elect to be sen-
prosecutor or the defense attorney tenced by either a judge or a jury, and
often asks that the jury be polled — in capital cases states generally require
CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 115
that no death sentence shall be im- tence shall be. Judges are presented
posed unless it is the determination of with a variety of alternatives and a
12 unanimous jurors. In some states range of sentences when it comes to
after a jury finds someone guilty, the punishment for the criminal. Many of
jury deliberates a second time to de- these alternatives involve the concept
termine the sentence. In several states of rehabilitation and call for the assis-
a new jury is empaneled expressly for tance of professionals in the fields of
sentencing. At this time the rules of criminology and social science.
evidence are more relaxed, and the The lightest punishment that a
jury may be permitted to hear evi- judge can hand down is that of proba-
dence that was excluded during the ac- tion. This is often the penalty if the
tual trial (for example, the previous crime is regarded as minor or if the
criminal record of the accused). judge believes that the guilty person is
After the judge pronounces the not likely to engage in additional
sentence, several weeks customarily criminal activity. If a probated sen-
elapse between the time the defendant tence is handed down, the criminal
is found guilty and the time when the may not spend any time in prison as
penalty is imposed. This interval per- long as the conditions of the proba-
mits the judge to hear and consider tion are maintained. Such conditions
any posttrial motions that the defense might include staying away from con-
attorney might make (such as a mo- victed criminals, not committing
tion for a new trial) and to allow a other crimes, or with increasing fre-
probation officer to conduct a presen- quency, performing some type of
tence investigation. The probation community service. If a criminal
officer is a professional with a back- serves out his or her probation with-
ground in criminology, psychology, out incident, the criminal record is
or social work, who makes a recom- usually wiped clean and in the eyes of
mendation to the judge about the the law it is as if no crime had ever
length of the sentence to be imposed. been committed.
The probation officer customarily If the judge is not disposed toward
examines factors such as the back- probation and feels that jail time is in
ground of the criminal, the serious- order, he or she must impose a prison
ness of the crime committed, and the sentence that is within a range pre-
likelihood that the criminal will con- scribed by law. The reason for a range
tinue to engage in illegal activity. of years instead of an automatically as-
Judges are not required to follow the signed number is that the law recog-
probation officer’s recommendation, nizes that not all crimes and criminals
but it is still a major factor in the are alike and that in principle the pun-
judge’s calculus as to what the sen- ishment should fit the crime.
116 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
tence in the United States (as long as it that are reversed on technicalities.
was in the range prescribed by law). Surely this does happen, and one
Criminal defendants do have some might argue that this is inevitable in
degree of success on appeal about 20 a democratic country whose legal
percent of the time, but this does not system is based on fair play and the
mean that the defendant goes free. presumption of the innocence of the
The usual practice is for the appellate accused. However, about 90 percent
court to remand the case (send it back of all defendants plead guilty, and
down) to the lower court for a new this plea virtually excludes the possi-
trial. At that point the prosecution bility of an appeal. Of the remaining
must determine whether the proce- group, two-thirds are found guilty at
dural errors in the original trial can be trial, and only a small percentage of
overcome in a second trial and these appeal. Of those who do appeal,
whether it is worth the time and effort only about 20 percent have any
to do so. A second trial is not consid- measurable degree of success. Of
ered to be double jeopardy, since the those whose convictions are reversed,
defendant has chosen to appeal the many are found guilty at a subsequent
original conviction. trial. Thus the number of persons
The media and others concerned convicted of crimes who are subse-
with the law often call attention to ap- quently freed because of reversible
pellate courts that turn loose seeming- court errors is a small fraction of
ly guilty criminals and to convictions 1 percent.
C H A P T E R
6THE
CIVIL
COURT
PROCESS
Civil actions are separate and distinct and a civil suit. Suppose that “Joe” and
from criminal proceedings. This chap- “Pete,” two political scientists attend-
ter focuses on civil courts: how civil ing a convention in Atlanta, are shar-
law differs from criminal law, the most ing a taxi from the airport to their
important categories of civil law, alter- downtown hotel. During the ride they
natives to trials, and a step-by-step become involved in a heated political
look at the civil trial process. discussion. By the time the taxi stops
at their hotel, the discussion has
THE NATURE AND become so heated that they get into a
SUBSTANCE OF CIVIL LAW physical confrontation. If Pete strikes
he American legal system ob-
T
Joe in the ribs with his briefcase as
serves several important dis- he gets out of the taxi, Pete may
tinctions between criminal and be charged with criminal assault. In
civil law. Criminal law is concerned addition, Joe might file a civil suit
with conduct that is offensive to socie- against Pete in an effort to obtain a
ty as a whole. Civil law pertains prima- monetary award sufficient to cover his
rily to the duties of private citizens to medical expenses.
each other. In civil cases the disputes Civil cases far outnumber criminal
are usually between private individu- cases in both the federal and state
als, although the government may courts, although they generally do not
sometimes be a party in a civil suit. attract the same media attention as
Criminal cases always involve govern- criminal trials. Still, they often raise
ment prosecution of an individual for important policy questions and cover
an alleged offense against society. a broad range of disagreements in so-
In a civil case the court attempts to ciety. Judicial scholar Herbert Jacob
settle a particular dispute between the summarizes the breadth of the civil
parties by determining their legal law field in Justice in America: “Every
rights. The court then decides upon an broken agreement, every sale that
appropriate remedy, such as awarding leaves a dissatisfied customer, every
monetary damages to the injured uncollected debt, every dispute with a
party or issuing an order that directs government agency, every libel and
one party to perform or refrain from a slander, every accidental injury, every
specific act. In a criminal case the marital breakup, and every death may
court decides whether the defendant is give rise to a civil proceeding.”
innocent or guilty. A guilty defendant Thus, virtually any dispute between
may be punished by a fine, imprison- two or more persons may provide the
ment, or both. basis for a civil suit. The number of
In some instances the same act may suits is huge, but most of them fall
give rise to both a criminal proceeding into one of five basic categories.
CHAPTER 6: THE CIVIL COURT PROCESS 121
Bankruptcy and creditors’ rights are important areas in contract law. Above, a jet belonging to
American Airlines, which in 2003 narrowly averted a bankruptcy filing.
122 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Another closely related field is Perhaps one reason for the growth
bankruptcy and creditors’ rights. in product liability cases is a change in
Bankrupt individuals or businesses the standard of proof. Traditionally,
may go through a process that essen- negligence (generally defined as care-
tially wipes the slate clean and allows lessness or the failure to use ordinary
the person filing for bankruptcy to care, under the particular circum-
begin again. The bankruptcy process stances revealed in the lawsuit) must
is also designed to ensure fairness to be proven before one person is able to
creditors. Bankruptcy law has been a collect damages for injuries caused by
major concern of legislators for someone else. However, some have ar-
several years, and a large number of gued that for many years reliance on
special bankruptcy judges are now at- the negligence concept has been de-
tached to the U.S. district courts. clining, especially in product liability
The final area is the insurance con- cases. In its place, the courts often use
tract, which is important because of a strict liability standard, which means
its applicability to so many people. that a victim can recover even if there
The insurance industry is regulated by was no negligence and even if the
government agencies and subject to its manufacturer was careful.
own distinct rules. Another reason commonly sug-
gested for the growth in the number
Tort Law of product liability cases is the size of
Tort law may generally be described jury awards when the decision favors
as the law of civil wrongs. It concerns the plaintiff. Jury awards for damages
conduct that causes injury and fails may be of two types: compensatory
to measure up to some standard set and punitive. Compensatory damages
by society. are intended to cover the plaintiff ’s
Actions for personal injury or actual loss, such as repair costs, doctor
bodily injury claims are at the heart bills, and hospital expenses. Punitive
of tort law, and automobile accidents (or exemplary) damages are designed,
have traditionally been responsible instead, to punish the defendant or
for a large number of these claims. serve as a warning against such behav-
One of the most rapidly growing ior in the future.
subfields of tort law is product lia- As a result of concern over large
bility. This category has become an jury awards and the increasing num-
increasingly effective way to hold ber of so-called frivolous cases,
corporations accountable for injuries government officials, corporate execu-
caused by defective foods, toys, appli- tives, interest groups, and members of
ances, automobiles, drugs, or a host of the legal community have called for
other products. legislation aimed at tort reform.
CHAPTER 6: THE CIVIL COURT PROCESS 123
Product liability is one of the most rapidly growing subfields of tort law, with many
manufacturers increasingly being held liable even when they were careful. Above, product
liability attorney Ralph G. Patino displays a tire that his client claimed separated from its casing
and caused a serious accident — one of many claims that led the Firestone Company to recall
millions of its tires in 2000.
Property law — the right to use and the right to acquire property — was the principal question
behind the Federal Communications Commission’s 2003 review of whether to ease
regulations on media ownership for corporations.
CHAPTER 6: THE CIVIL COURT PROCESS 125
restriction is zoning, a practice where- drawn it up), then the person has died
by local laws divide a municipality intestate, and the state must dispose of
into districts designated for different the property.
uses. For instance, one neighborhood The state’s disposition of the prop-
may be designated as residential, an- erty is carried out according to the
other as commercial, and yet another fixed scheme set forth in the state
as industrial. statutes. By law, intestate property
Early zoning laws were challenged passes to the deceased person’s heirs
on the ground that restrictions on — that is, to his or her nearest
land use amounted to a taking of the relatives. Occasionally a person who
land by the city in violation of the dies intestate has no living relatives.
Constitution, which says, “Nor shall In that situation the property escheats,
private property be taken for public or passes, to the state in which the
use without just compensation.” In a deceased resided. State statutes often
sense, zoning laws do take from the prohibit the more remote relatives,
owners of land the right to use their such as second cousins and great un-
property in any way they see fit. cles and aunts, from inheriting.
Nonetheless, courts have generally Increasingly, Americans are prepar-
ruled that zoning laws are not regard- ing wills to ensure that their property
ed as a taking in violation of the Con- is disposed of according to their
stitution. Today, zoning is a fact of life wishes, not according to a scheme
in cities and towns of all sizes determined by the state. A will is a
throughout the United States. City formal document. It must be very
planners and other city officials recog- carefully drafted, and in most states
nize zoning ordinances as necessary to it must be witnessed by at least
the planned and orderly growth of two persons.
urban areas.
Family Law
The Law of Succession Family law concerns such matters as
The law of succession considers how marriage, divorce, child custody, and
property is passed along from one children’s rights. It clearly touches the
generation to another. The American lives of a great number of Americans
legal system recognizes a person’s right each year.
to dispose of his or her property as he The conditions necessary for enter-
or she wishes. One common way to do ing into a marriage are spelled out by
this is to execute a will. If a person state law. These laws traditionally
leaves behind a valid will, the courts cover the minimum age of the parties,
will enforce it. However, if someone required blood tests or physical
leaves no will (or has improperly examinations, mental conditions of
126 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
the parties, license and fee require- ward no-fault divorce. This trend was
ments, and waiting periods. the result of two factors. First, for
The termination of a marriage many years there was an increasing de-
was once very rare. In the early 19th mand for divorces. Second, the stigma
century some states granted divorces once attached to divorced persons all
only through special acts of the legis- but disappeared.
lature; one state, South Carolina, The no-fault divorce system means
simply did not allow divorce. In the that the parties simply explain that ir-
other states divorces were granted reconcilable differences exist between
only when one party proved some them and that the marriage is no
grounds for divorce. In other words, longer viable. The no-fault divorce
divorces were available only to inno- system has put an end to the adversar-
cent parties whose spouses were guilty ial nature of divorce proceedings.
of such things as adultery, desertion, Not so easily solved are some of
or cruelty. the other problems that may result
The 20th century saw an enormous from an ended marriage. Child
change in divorce laws. The movement custody battles, disputes over child
was away from restrictive laws and to- support payments, and disagreements
Two children await the results of a custody decision by the Manhattan Family Court. Custody
disputes have become more common as a result of no-fault divorce, and courts increasingly
have to decide which parent will get custody.
CHAPTER 6: THE CIVIL COURT PROCESS 127
lems with the return of faulty trials are designed to help define the
merchandise, and overcharging for issues and develop a basis for realistic
services. Arbitration is also being used settlement negotiations. The rep-
in court-referred and court-annexed resentatives from the two sides present
processes to resolve several types of an overview of their positions and
disputes, including business, commer- arguments to the panel. As a result,
cial, and employment disputes. each party becomes more knowledge-
able about the other party’s position.
Neutral Fact-Finding. Neutral fact- Having heard each side’s presentation,
finding is an informal process whereby the panel, including the advisor, meets
an agreed-upon neutral party is asked to develop a compromise solution.
to investigate a dispute. Usually, the The neutral advisor may also issue an
dispute involves complex or technical advisory opinion regarding the merits
issues. The neutral third party ana- of the case. This advisory opinion is
lyzes the disputed facts and issues his nonbinding unless the parties have
or her findings in a nonbinding report agreed in writing beforehand to be
or recommendation. bound by it.
This process can be particularly The primary benefit of a mini-trial
useful in handling allegations of racial is that both parties have an opportuni-
or gender discrimination within a ty to develop solutions. It also means
company because such cases often that each has representation and ac-
provoke strong emotions and internal cess to detailed information.
dissension. If both parties are employ-
ees of the same company, conflicts of Summary Jury Trial. A summary
interest could interfere with a supervi- jury trial involves a court-managed
sor or manager’s ability to conduct an process that takes place after a case has
impartial investigation of alleged dis- been filed, but before it reaches trial.
crimination. To avoid the appearance In a summary jury trial each party
of unfairness, a company may turn to presents its arguments to a jury (nor-
a neutral third party in hopes of reach- mally six persons). An overview of
ing a settlement all the employees can each side’s argument as well as abbre-
respect. viated opening and closing arguments
are presented. Attorneys are typically
Mini-Trial. In a mini-trial each party given a short amount of time (an hour
presents its position in a trial-like or less) for their presentations. They
fashion before a panel that consists of are limited to the presentation of in-
selected representatives for both par- formation that would be admissible at
ties and neutral third parties. Every trial. No testimony is taken from
panel has one neutral advisor. Mini- sworn witnesses, and proceedings are
130 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
and the Federal Communications between the parties and thus no actu-
Commission carry out an adjudica- al case for the court to decide.
tion of sorts within their respective A second major difference is that
spheres of authority. An appeal of the the standard of proof used in civil
ruling of one of these agencies may be cases is a preponderance of the
taken to a federal court of appeals. evidence, not the more stringent
At the state level, a common exam- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard
ple of an administrative body that aids used in criminal cases. A preponder-
in the resolution of civil claims is a ance of the evidence is generally
workers’ compensation board. This taken to mean that there is sufficient
board determines whether an em- evidence to overcome doubt or specu-
ployee’s injury is job-related and thus lation. It clearly means that less
whether the person is entitled to proof is required in civil cases than
workers’ compensation payments. in criminal cases.
Many state motor vehicle departments A third major difference is that
have hearing boards to make determi- many of the extensive due process
nations about revoking driver’s licens- guarantees that a defendant has in a
es. Another type of administrative criminal trial do not apply in a civil
board commonly found in the states proceeding. For example, neither
rules on civil rights matters and cases party is constitutionally entitled to
of alleged discrimination. counsel. The Seventh Amendment
does guarantee the right to a jury trial
THE CIVIL TRIAL PROCESS in lawsuits “where the value in contro-
number of disputes are re- versy shall exceed $20.” Although this
Heavy media coverage often prompts defense attorneys to move for a change of venue so as
to avoid prejudicing their client’s case, for instance, in auto accidents caused by drunk drivers.
CHAPTER 6: THE CIVIL COURT PROCESS 133
The determination of proper venue dant does not do so, then he or she
may be prescribed by statute based on may be subject to a default judgment.
avoiding possible prejudice, or it may These simple actions by the plain-
simply be a matter of convenience. tiff, clerk of the court, and a process
The federal law states that proper server set in motion the civil case.
venue is the district in which either the What happens next is a flurry of activ-
plaintiff or defendant resides, or the ities that precedes an actual trial and
district where the injury occurred. may last for several months. Approxi-
State venue statutes vary somewhat, mately 75 percent of cases are resolved
but they usually provide that where without a trial during this time.
land is involved, proper venue is the
county where the land is located. In Pretrial Activities
most other instances venue is the Motions. Once the summons has
county where the defendant resides. been served on the defendant, a num-
Venue questions may also be relat- ber of motions can be made by the
ed to the perceived or feared prejudice defense attorney. A motion to quash
of either the judge or the prospective requests that the court void the sum-
jury. Attorneys sometimes object to mons on the ground that it was not
trials being held in a particular area properly served. For example, a defen-
for this reason and may move for a dant might contend that the summons
change of venue. Although this type was never delivered personally as re-
of objection is perhaps more com- quired by state law.
monly associated with highly publi- Two types of motions are meant to
cized criminal trials, it is also found clarify or to object to the plaintiff ’s pe-
in civil trials. tition. A motion to strike requests that
Once the appropriate court has the court excise, or strike, certain parts
been determined and the complaint of the petition because they are preju-
has been filed, the court clerk will at- dicial, improper, or irrelevant. A mo-
tach a copy of the complaint to a sum- tion to make more definite asks the
mons, which is then issued to the de- court to require the plaintiff to be
fendant. The summons may be served more specific about the complaints.
by personnel from the sheriff ’s office, A fourth type of motion often filed
a U.S. marshal, or a private process- in a civil case is a motion to dismiss.
service agency. This motion may argue that the court
The summons directs the defen- lacks jurisdiction, or it may insist that
dant to file a response, known as a the plaintiff has not presented a legally
pleading, within a certain period of sound basis for action against the de-
time (usually 30 days). If the defen- fendant even if the allegations are true.
134 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
the case. Some judges actively work to As in criminal trials, jurors must be
bring about a settlement so the case selected in a random manner from a
does not have to go to trial. fair cross-section of the community. A
large panel of jurors is called to the
The Civil Trial courthouse, and when a case is as-
Selection of Jury. The right to a jury signed to a court for trial, a smaller
trial in a civil suit in a federal court is group of prospective jurors is sent to a
guaranteed by the Seventh Amend- particular courtroom.
ment of the U.S. Constitution. State Following the voir dire examina-
constitutions likewise provide for such tion, which may include challenges to
a right. A jury trial may be waived, in certain jurors by the attorneys, a jury
which case the judge decides the mat- to hear the particular case will be
ter. Although the jury traditionally seated. Lawyers may challenge a
consists of 12 persons, today the num- prospective juror for cause, in which
ber varies. Most of the federal district case the judge must determine
courts now use juries of fewer than 12 whether the person challenged is im-
persons in civil cases. A majority of partial. Each side may also exercise a
states also authorize smaller juries in certain number of peremptory chal-
some or all civil trials. lenges — excusing a juror without
The Seventh Amendment of the Constitution and state constitutions guarantee the right to a
jury trial in civil suits. As a result, many citizens such as these women from Macomb County,
Michigan, are called to serve as jurors.
136 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
When the plaintiff ’s side has pre- evidence, which is aimed at refuting
sented all its evidence, the attorney the defendant’s evidence.
rests the case.
Answer to Plaintiff’s Rebuttal. The
Motion for Directed Verdict. After defendant’s lawyer may present evi-
the plaintiff ’s case has been rested, the dence to counter the rebuttal evi-
defendant will often make a motion dence. This rebuttal-and-answer
for a directed verdict. With the filing pattern may continue until the evi-
of this motion, the defendant is saying dence has been exhausted.
that the plaintiff has not proved his or
her case and thus should lose. The Closing Arguments. After all the
judge must then decide whether the evidence has been presented, the
plaintiff could win at this point if lawyers make closing arguments, or
court proceedings were to cease. summations, to the jury. The plain-
Should the judge determine that the tiff ’s attorney speaks both first and
plaintiff has not presented convincing last. That is, he or she both opens
enough evidence, he or she will sus- the argument and closes it, and the
tain the motion and direct the verdict defendant’s lawyer argues in between.
for the defendant. Thus the plaintiff In this stage of the process each attor-
will lose the case. The motion for a di- ney attacks the opponent’s evidence
rected verdict is similar to the pretrial for its unreliability and may also
motion to dismiss. attempt to discredit the opponent’s
witnesses. In doing so, the lawyers
Presentation of the Defendant’s often wax eloquent or deliver an emo-
Case. If the motion for a directed tional appeal to the jury. However, the
verdict is overruled, the defendant arguments must be based upon facts
then presents evidence. The defen- supported by the evidence and intro-
dant’s case is presented in the same duced at the trial.
way as the plaintiff ’s case. That is,
there is direct examination of witness- Instructions to the Jury. Assuming
es and presentation of documents that a jury trial has not been waived,
and other exhibits. The plaintiff the instructions to the jury follow the
has the right to cross-examine wit- conclusion of the closing arguments.
nesses. Redirect and recross questions The judge informs the jury that it
may follow. must base its verdict on the evidence
presented at the trial. The judge’s in-
Plaintiff’s Rebuttal. After the pres- structions also inform the jurors
entation of the defendant’s case, the about the rules, principles, and stan-
plaintiff may bring forth rebuttal dards of the particular legal concept
138 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
the court clerk issue an order to exe- mon grounds for appeal are that the
cute the judgment. The execution is judge allegedly admitted evidence that
issued to the sheriff and orders the should have been excluded, refused to
sheriff to seize the defendant’s proper- admit evidence that should have been
ty and sell it at auction to satisfy the introduced, or failed to give proper
judgment. An alternative is to order a jury instructions.
lien, which is the legal right to hold An attorney lays the groundwork
property that may be used for the pay- for an appeal by objecting to the
ment of the judgment. alleged error during the trial. This
objection goes into the trial record
Appeal. If one party feels that an and becomes a part of the trial tran-
error of law was made during the trial, script, which may be reviewed by an
and if the judge refuses to grant a appellate court. The appellate court
posttrial motion for a new trial, then decision may call for the lower court
the dissatisfied party may appeal to a to enforce its earlier verdict or to hold
higher court. Probably the most com- a new trial.
C H A P T E R
7
FEDERAL
JUDGES
The main actors in the federal system never been collected, but a good deal
are the men and women who serve as is known about judges who have
judges and justices. What characteris- served in recent decades.
tics do these people have that distin- Before assuming the federal bench,
guish them from the rest of the citi- a plurality of judges had been judges
zenry? What are the qualifications — at the state or local level. The next
both formal and informal — for ap- largest blocs were employed either in
pointment to the bench? How are the political or governmental realms
judges selected and who are the partic- or in moderate- to large-sized law
ipants in the process? How do judges firms. Those working in small law
learn to be judges? How are judges dis- firms or as professors of law made up
ciplined and when are they removed the smallest bloc.
from the bench? Judges’ educational background re-
veals something of their elite nature.
BACKGROUND All graduated from college; about half
CHARACTERISTICS OF attended either costly Ivy League
FEDERAL JUDGES schools or other private universities to
mericans cling to the notion receive their undergraduate and law
senator(s), or local party leaders who cal operatives. The Federal Bureau of
send forth the names of candidates. Investigation (FBI), an arm of the Jus-
tice Department, customarily per-
Self-Selection: While many consider forms a routine security check. After
it undignified and lacking in judicial the nomination is announced to the
temperament for someone to an- public, various interest groups that
nounce publicly a desire for a federal believe they have a stake in the ap-
judgeship, some would-be jurists or- pointment may lobby for or against
chestrate discreet campaigns on their the candidate. Also, the candidate’s
own behalf or at least pass the word qualifications will be evaluated by a
that they are available for judicial serv- committee of the American Bar Asso-
ice. Few will admit to seeking an ap- ciation. The candidate’s name is sent
pointment actively, but credible anec- to the Senate Judiciary Committee,
dotes suggest that attorneys often which conducts an investigation of the
position themselves in such a way that nominee’s fitness for the post. If the
their names will come up when there committee’s vote is favorable, the
is a vacant seat to fill. nomination is sent to the floor of the
Senate, where it is either approved or
The Element of Luck: A good meas- rejected by a simple majority vote.
ure of happenstance exists in virtually
all judicial appointments. Being a The President
member of the right party at the right Technically, the president nominates
time or being visible to the power bro- all judicial candidates, but historically
kers at the right moment often has as the chief executive has been more in-
much to do with becoming a judge as volved in appointments to the Supreme
one’s professional background. Court than to the lower courts. This is
so for two major reasons.
THE FEDERAL SELECTION First, Supreme Court appoint-
PROCESS AND ITS ments are seen by the president — and
PARTICIPANTS by the public at large — as generally
he framework of judicial selec- more important and politically signif-
President Lyndon B. Johnson, right, appointed the first African American member of the
Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall, left, in 1967.
CHAPTER 7: FEDERAL JUDGES 147
States and the deputy attorney is dominant, and their role in the
general. Their primary job is to seek choice of appeals court judges is
out candidates for federal judicial minimal. However, in the selection of
posts who conform to general criteria U.S. trial judges their impact is formi-
set by the president. Once several dable, especially when appointments
names are obtained, the staff of the occur in states in which neither sena-
Justice Department will subject each tor is of the president’s political party.
candidate to further scrutiny. They In such cases the president will be
may order an FBI investigation of the more likely to consult with state
candidate’s character and background; leaders of his own party rather than
they will usually read copies of all with the state’s senators.
articles or speeches the candidate has
written or evaluate a sitting judge’s Interest Groups
written opinions; they might check A number of pressure groups in the
with local party leaders to determine United States, representing the whole
that the candidate is a party faithful political spectrum from left to right,
and is in tune with the president’s often lobby either for or against judi-
major public policy positions. cial nominations. Leaders of these
In the case of district judge ap- groups — civil liberties, business, or-
pointments, where names are often ganized labor, civil rights — have little
submitted by home-state senators, the hesitation about urging the president
Justice Department’s function is more to withdraw the nomination of some-
that of screener than of initiator. Re- one whose political and social values
gardless of who comes up with a list of are different from their own or about
names, the Justice Department’s pri- lobbying the Senate to support the
mary duty is to evaluate the candi- nomination of someone who is favor-
date’s personal, professional, and ably perceived. Interest groups lobby
political qualifications. In performing for and against nominees at all levels
this role the department may work of the federal judiciary.
closely with the White House staff,
with the senators involved in the nom- The American Bar Association
ination, and with party leaders who (ABA)
may wish to have some input in For more than five decades, the Com-
choosing the nominee. mittee on the Federal Judiciary of the
ABA has played a key role in evalu-
State and Local Party Leaders ating the professional credentials of
Regional party leaders have little to say potential nominees for positions on
in the appointment of Supreme Court the federal bench. The committee,
justices, where presidential prerogative whose 15 members represent all the
148 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
The President
nominates all federal
judicial candidates,
but individual senators
and local party leaders
traditionally wield a
lot of influence in the
case of lower court
appointments.
Above, two U.S.
district court judges
presiding in a
naturalization
ceremony in New York
State. Center,
President George W.
Bush congratulates his
nominees to federal
judgeships. Bottom,
Senior Judge
Constance Baker
Motley, right, of the
U.S. District Court for
the Southern District
of New York speaks at
a panel discussion.
CHAPTER 7: FEDERAL JUDGES 149
U.S. circuits, evaluates candidates on and a few scholars have taken the posi-
the basis of three criteria: judicial tem- tion that the Senate ought quietly to go
perament, professional competence, along with the presidential choices un-
and integrity. A candidate approved by less overwhelmingly strong reasons
the committee is rated either “quali- exist to the contrary. Other scholars
fied” or “well qualified,” whereas an and most senators have held the view
unacceptable candidate is stamped that the Senate has the right and the
with a “not qualified” label. obligation to make its own decision re-
garding the nominee. In practice the
The Senate Judiciary Committee role of the Senate in the judicial confir-
The rules of the Senate require its Ju- mation process has varied, depending
diciary Committee to consider all on the level of the federal judgeship
nominations to the federal bench and that is being considered.
to make recommendations to the Sen- For district judges the norm of sen-
ate as a whole. Its role is thus to screen atorial courtesy prevails. That is, if the
individuals who have already been president’s nominee is acceptable to
nominated, not to suggest names of the senator(s) of the president’s party
possible candidates. The committee in the state in which the judge is to sit,
holds hearings on all nominations, at the Senate is usually happy to confirm
which time witnesses are heard and the appointment. For appointments to
deliberations take place behind closed the appeals courts, senatorial courtesy
doors. The hearings for district court does not apply, since the vacancy to be
appointments are largely perfunctory filled covers more than just the state of
because the norm of senatorial cour- one or possibly two senators. But sen-
tesy has, for all intents and purposes, ators from each state in the circuit in
already determined whether the can- which the vacancy has occurred cus-
didate will be acceptable to the Senate. tomarily submit names of possible
However, for appeals court nominees candidates to the president. An un-
— and surely for an appointment to written rule is that each state in the cir-
the Supreme Court — the committee cuit should have at least one judge on
hearing is a serious proceeding. that circuit’s appellate bench. As long
as the norms are adhered to and the
The Senate president’s nominee has reasonably
The final step in the judicial appoint- good qualifications, the Senate as a
ment process for federal judges is a whole usually goes along with the rec-
majority vote by the Senate. Historical- ommendations of the chief executive.
ly, two general views have prevailed of The Senate has been inclined to
the Senate’s prescribed role. Presidents dispute the president if disagreement
from the time of George Washington arises over a nominee’s fitness for the
150 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
High Court. Since 1789, presidents Not only does the United States
have sent the names of 144 Supreme lack formalized training procedures
Court nominees to the Senate for its for the judicial profession, but there is
advice and consent. Of this number, an assumption that being a lawyer for
30 were either rejected or “indefinitely a decade or so is all the experience one
postponed” by the Senate, or the needs to be a judge. On the contrary,
names were withdrawn by the presi- becoming a judge in America requires
dent. Thus presidents have been suc- a good deal of freshman socialization
cessful about 79 percent of the time, (short-term learning and adjustment
and their success rate seems to be im- to the new role) and occupational so-
proving, given that as many as one- cialization (on-the-job training over a
third of the nominations were rejected period of years).
by the Senate in the 19th century. The Typical new trial court appointees
record shows that presidents have met may be first-rate lawyers and experts
with the most success in getting their in a few areas of the law in which they
High Court nominations approved have specialized. As judges, however,
when the nominee comes from a non- they are expected to be experts on all
controversial background and has legal subjects, are required to engage
middle-of-the-road political leanings, in judicial duties usually unrelated to
and when the president’s party also any tasks they performed as lawyers
controls the Senate, or at least a ma- (for example, sentencing), and are
jority shares the president’s basic atti- given a host of administrative assign-
tudes and values. ments for which they have had no
prior experience (for example, learn-
THE JUDICIAL ing how to docket efficiently several
SOCIALIZATION PROCESS hundred diverse cases).
n college and law school, future
I
At the appeals court level there
judges acquire important analytic is also a period of freshman socializa-
and communication skills, in ad- tion — despite the circuit judge’s
dition to the basic substance of the possible prior judicial experience —
law. After a couple of decades of legal and former trial judges appear to
practice, the future judge has learned a make the transition more easily.
good bit about how the courts and the During the transition time, circuit
law actually work and has specialized judges tend to speak less for the court
in several areas of the law. Despite all than their more experienced col-
this preparation, sometimes called leagues. They often take longer to
“anticipatory socialization,” most new write opinions, defer more often
judges in America still have a lot to to senior colleagues, or experience a
learn about being a judge. period of indecision.
CHAPTER 7: FEDERAL JUDGES 151
The learning process for new the law schools — the key instructors
Supreme Court justices is even harder. tend to be seasoned judges whose real-
As with new appeals court judges, life experience on the bench
novice Supreme Court justices tend commands the respect of the new
to defer to senior associates, to write members of the federal judiciary.
fewer majority and dissenting opin- What is the significance of this so-
ions, and to manifest a degree of cialization process for the operation of
uncertainty. New High Court ap- the U.S. judicial-legal system? First,
pointees may have more judicial the agents of socialization that are
experience than their lower-court readily available to the novice jurists
colleagues, but the fact that the allow the system to operate more
Supreme Court is involved in broad smoothly, with a minimum of down
judicial policy making — as opposed time. If new judges were isolated from
to the error correction of the appeals their more experienced associates, ge-
courts and the norm enforcement of ographically or otherwise, they would
the trial courts — may account for require more time to learn the fine
their initial indecisiveness. points of their trade and presumably a
Given the need on the part of greater number of errors would occur
all new federal jurists for both fresh- in litigation.
man and occupational socialization, Second, the fact that the system is
where do they go for instruction? able to provide its own socialization
For both the appeals court judges — that the older, experienced jurists
and their trial court peers, most of train the novices — serves as a sort of
their training comes from their glue that helps bond the system to-
more senior, experienced colleagues gether. It allows the judicial values,
on the bench — particularly the chief practices, and orientations of one gen-
judge of the circuit or district. Like- eration of judges to be passed on to
wise on the Supreme Court, older as- another. It gives continuity and a sense
sociates, often the chief justice, play a of permanence to a system that oper-
primary part in passing on to novice ates in a world where chaos and ran-
justices the essential rules and values dom behavior are common.
of the Court.
Training seminars provided by the THE RETIREMENT AND
Federal Judicial Center for newly ap- REMOVAL OF JUDGES
pointed judges also play an important udges cease performing their
role in the training and socialization
of new jurists. Although some of these
seminars are conducted by outsider
J judicial duties when they retire
by choice or because of ill health
or death, or when they are subjected
specialists — subject matter experts in to the disciplinary actions of others.
152 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
moved; and an Article III judge may retire with full pay and benefits under
be subject to private or public what is called the rule of 80; that is,
reprimand or censure, certification of when the sum of a judge’s age and
disability, request for voluntary resig- number of years on the bench is 80.
nation, or prohibition against further Congress has also permitted judges to
case assignments. However, removal go on senior status instead of accept-
of an Article III judge is not permit- ing full retirement. In exchange for a
ted; impeachment is still the only re- reduced caseload they are permitted
course. If the council determines that to retain their office and staff and —
the conduct might constitute equally important — the prestige and
grounds for impeachment, it will no- self-respect of being an active judge.
tify the Judicial Conference, which in Judges often time their resignations
turn may transmit the case to the to occur when their party controls the
U.S. House of Representatives for presidency so that they will be re-
consideration. placed by a jurist of similar political
and judicial orientation. A 1990 study
Disability of Federal Judges found that especially since 1954, “ju-
Perhaps more problematic than re- dicial retirement/resignation rates
moving jurists for misconduct is the have been strongly influenced by po-
removal of those who have become litical/ideological considerations, and
too old and infirm to carry out their infused with partisanship,” thus indi-
judicial responsibilities effectively. cating that many jurists view them-
Congress has tried with some success selves as part of a policy link between
to tempt the more senior judges into the people, the judicial appointment
retirement by making it financially process, and the subsequent decisions
more attractive to do so. Since 1984 of the judges and justices.
federal judges have been permitted to
154 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
serving on the state supreme court district attorneys, and only 3 percent
bench, only 13 percent have any come from private criminal law
prior federal experience, whereas practice. Of those serving on state
93 percent have some type of prior supreme courts, almost two-thirds
state experience. came from the ranks of the
intermediate appellate courts or
Judges tend to be middle-aged when from the state trial courts.
they assume the bench. State trial
judges come to the bench at about THE SELECTION PROCESS
age 46, which corresponds roughly FOR STATE JUDGES
to the figure of 49 for federal trial
judges. State appellate court judges t the state level a variety of
tend to be slightly older than their
trial court colleagues when they
become jurists — about 53, which is
approximately the same as their
A methods are used to select
jurists, and each of these has
many permutations. Basically,
there are five routes to a judgeship
federal equivalents. in any one of the 50 states: partisan
election, nonpartisan election,
In terms of political party affiliation, merit selection, gubernatorial
state judges, whether they be elected appointment, and appointment by
or appointed, tend to mirror the the legislature.
party that dominates in the judge’s
state. Also, the vast majority of state Election of Judges
judges had been politically active
before assuming the bench, whether The election of judges, on either a
they were elected to the bench or partisan or a nonpartisan ballot, is
appointed by a governor. the norm in the states. This method
became popular during the time of
Over half the state trial judges come President Andrew Jackson (1829-
to the bench from the private 37), an era when Americans sought
practice of law, and about a quarter to democratize the political process.
were elevated from a lower court In practice, however, political party
judgeship, such as a magistrate’s leaders often regard judicial
position. Of those who practiced elections as indirect patronage to
law, most reported a general practice reward the party faithful. Also,
without specialization. About one in judges who must run for election
five was recruited from the ranks of
156 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
are often forced to solicit campaign was Missouri in 1940, and ever since
contributions from the lawyers and such schemes have come to be
law firms that will eventually appear known as generic variants of
before them in court — a potential “the Missouri Plan.”
source of conflict of interest. Finally,
voter turnout in judicial elections The states with Missouri-type plans
is extremely low. Voters may know use a combination of elections and
whom they prefer for president or appointments. The governor
member of Congress or state appoints a judge from among several
senator, but they may be unfamiliar candidates recommended by a
with the persons running for nominating panel of five or more
state judgeships. people, usually including attorneys
(often chosen by the local bar
As part of the Progressive movement association), nonlawyers appointed
at the turn of the 20th century, by the governor, and sometimes a
reformers sought to take some of senior local judge. Either by law or
the partisanship out of judicial by implicit agreement, the governor
elections by having judges run on a appoints someone from the
nonpartisan basis. In principle they recommended list. After serving for
would run on their ideas and a short period of time, often a year,
qualifications, not on the basis of the newly appointed judge must
which party they belonged to. stand for a special election, at which
But even in these technically time he or she in effect runs on his
nonpartisan states, the political or her record. (The voters are asked,
parties endorse individual judicial “Shall Judge X be retained in
candidates and contribute to their office?”) If the judge’s tenure is
campaigns so that the candidates supported by the voters, as is
acquire identification with one virtually always the case, the judge
political party or another. will serve for a regular and fairly
long term.
Merit Selection
Gubernatorial Appointment and
Merit selection has been in use since Legislative Appointment
the early 1900s as a preferred
method of selecting judges. The first Today, judges are chosen by the
state fully to adopt such a method governor or by the state legislature
in only a handful of states. When
judges are appointed by the
CHAPTER 7: FEDERAL JUDGES 157
8
IMPLEMENTATION
AND
IMPACT
OF
JUDICIAL
POLICIES
A
judges, who had the task of enforcing
U.S. Supreme Court, often are the ruling, that the public schools were
viewed as the most likely to make a prompt and reasonable start
courts to be involved in policy mak- and then proceed with all deliberate
ing, while the trial courts are generally speed to bring about desegregation.
seen as norm enforcers. However, What constitutes a prompt and
lower-court judges have a great deal of reasonable start? How rapidly must
independence from the appellate a school district proceed in order to
courts and may be viewed, according be moving with all deliberate speed?
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL POLICIES 161
The Supreme Court did not provide and unusual punishment in violation
specific answers to these questions. of the Eighth Amendment to the
Although not all High Court Constitution. Others voted to strike
decisions are so open to interpreta- down the state laws because they were
tion, a good number of them are. A applied in a discriminatory manner.
court’s decision may be unclear for The uncertainty created by the 1972
several reasons. Sometimes the issue decision affected not only lower-court
or subject matter may be so complex judges but also state legislatures.
that it is difficult to fashion a clear The states passed a rash of widely
policy. In obscenity cases, for instance, divergent death penalty statutes and
the Supreme Court has had little caused a considerable amount of
difficulty in deciding that porno- new litigation.
graphic material is not entitled to A lower-court judge’s discretion
protection as free speech under the in the implementation process may
First Amendment to the Constitution. also be affected by the manner in
Defining obscenity has proven to which a higher court’s policy is com-
be another matter, however. Phrases municated. Certainly the court from
such as “prurient interest,” “patently which a case has been appealed will be
offensive,” “contemporary community informed of the decision. However,
standards,” and “without redeeming systematic, formal efforts are not
social value” have become common- made to inform other courts of the
place in obscenity opinions, but these decision or to see that lower-court
terms leave a good deal of room for judges have access to a copy of the
subjective interpretation. opinion. The decisions that contain
Policies established by collegial the new judicial policy are made avail-
courts are often ambiguous because able to the public in printed form or
the majority opinion is written to on the Internet, and judges are expect-
accommodate several judges. The ma- ed to read them if they have the time
jority opinion may also be accompa- and inclination.
nied by several concurring opinions. Opinions of the Supreme Court,
When this happens, lower court lower federal courts, and state appel-
judges are left without a clear-cut late courts are available in a large
precedent to follow. For example, number of courthouse, law school,
in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the and university libraries. They are also
Supreme Court struck down the death increasingly available on the Internet.
penalty in several states, but for a This widespread availability does not
variety of reasons. Some justices guarantee that they will be read and
opposed the death penalty per se, on clearly understood, however. Many
the ground that it constituted cruel lower-level state judges, such as jus-
162 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
tices of the peace and juvenile court court judge’s discretion may be to
judges, are nonlawyers who have little interpret what the higher court’s
interest or skill in reading complex decision means.
judicial decisions. Finally, even those The manner in which a lower-
judges who have an interest in higher- court judge interprets a policy estab-
court decisions and the ability to lished by a higher court depends
understand them do not have ade- upon a number of factors. Many
quate time to keep abreast of all the policies are not clearly stated. Thus
new opinions. reasonable people may disagree over
Given these problems, how do the proper interpretation. Even policy
judges become aware of upper-court pronouncements that do not suffer
decisions? One way is to hear of them from ambiguity, however, are some-
through lawyers presenting cases in times interpreted differently by differ-
the lower courts. It is generally as- ent judges.
sumed that the opposing attorneys A judge’s own personal policy pref-
will present relevant precedents in erences will also have an effect upon
their arguments before the judge. the interpretation he or she gives to a
Those judges who have law clerks may higher-court policy. Judges come to
also rely upon them to search out re- the courts with their own unique
cent decisions from higher courts. background characteristics. Some are
Thus some higher-court policies Republican, others are Democrat; one
are not quickly and strictly enforced judge may be more lenient, another
simply because lower-court judges are strict. They come from different re-
not aware of them. Even those policies gions of the country. Some have been
which lower-court judges are aware of prosecutors; others have been prima-
may not be so clear to them. Either rily defense lawyers or corporate
reason contributes to the discretion lawyers. In short, their backgrounds
exercised by lower-court judges placed may influence their own particular
in the position of having to imple- policy preferences. Thus the lower-
ment judicial policies. court judges may read their own ideas
into a higher-court policy. The result
Interpretation by Lower Courts is that a policy may be enthusiastically
One study noted that “important embraced by some judges yet totally
policy announcements almost always rejected by others.
require interpretation by someone
other than the policy maker.” This Strategies Employed by Lower
is certainly true in the case of judicial Courts
policies established by appellate Judges who favor and accept a higher
courts. The first exercise of a lower- court’s policy will naturally try to en-
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL POLICIES 163
In the course of deciding cases, the Besides ruling on statutes, the fed-
courts are often called upon to inter- eral courts interpret the Constitution.
pret federal statutes. On occasion the Congress has two methods to reverse
judicial interpretation may differ from or alter the effects of a constitutional
what a majority in Congress intended. interpretation it does not like. First,
When that situation occurs, Congress Congress can respond with another
can change the statute in new legisla- statute designed to avoid the constitu-
tion that in effect overrules the court’s tional problems. Second, a constitu-
initial interpretation. However, the tional decision can be overturned
vast majority of the federal judiciary’s directly by an amendment to the
statutory decisions are not changed U.S. Constitution. Although many
by Congress. such amendments have been intro-
President Lyndon B. Johnson, after signing into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964, reaches to
shake hands with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This law was an example of Congress’ key role in
implementing a decision by the Supreme Court, in this instance, school desegregation policy.
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL POLICIES 165
duced over the years, it is not easy support for a policy of desegregated
to obtain the necessary two-thirds public schools by passing the Elemen-
vote in each house of Congress to tary and Secondary Education Act.
propose the amendment and then This act gave the federal government a
achieve ratification by three-fourths much larger role in financing public
of the states. Only four Supreme education and thus made the threat to
Court decisions in the history of cut off federal funds a serious problem
the Court have been overturned by for many segregated school districts.
constitutional amendments. Such support from Congress was sig-
Congressional attacks on the fed- nificant because the likelihood of
eral courts in general and on certain compliance with a policy is increased
judges in particular are another when there is unity between branches
method of responding to judicial deci- of government.
sions. These attacks may take the form
of verbal denouncements by a mem- EXECUTIVE BRANCH
ber of Congress, threats of impeach- INFLUENCES ON THE
ment of sitting judges, or more IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
thorough investigations of the judicial t times the president may be
philosophies of potential nominees to
the federal bench.
Congress and the federal courts are
A called upon directly to imple-
ment a judicial decision. An
example is United States v. Nixon
not natural adversaries, however. Re- (1974). A Senate committee investiga-
taliations against the federal judiciary tion into the cover-up of a break-in at
are fairly rare, and often the two the Democratic Party headquarters in
branches work in harmony toward the Watergate Hotel in Washington,
similar policy goals. For example, D.C., led directly to high government
Congress played a key role in imple- officials working close to the presi-
menting the Supreme Court’s school dent. It was also revealed during the
desegregation policy by enacting the investigation that President Richard
Civil Rights Act of 1964, which em- Nixon had installed an automatic
powered the Justice Department to taping system in the Oval Office. Leon
initiate suits against school districts Jaworski, who had been appointed
that failed to comply with the Brown v. special prosecutor to investigate the
Board of Education decision. Title VI Watergate affair, subpoenaed certain
of the Act also provided a potent tapes that he felt might provide
weapon in the desegregation struggle evidence needed in his prosecution of
by threatening the denial of federal high-ranking officials. Nixon refused
funds to schools guilty of segregation. to turn over the tapes on grounds of
In 1965 Congress further solidified its executive privilege and the need for
166 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
sional statutes that provided benefits committed may choose from a variety
for married male members of the Air of options to remedy the wrong.
Force but did not provide similar ben- Among the more common options
efits for married female members. are process remedies, performance
Lieutenant Sharron Frontiero chal- standards, and specified remedial
lenged the policy on the ground that it actions. Process remedies provide for
constituted sexual discrimination. A such things as advisory committees,
federal district court in Alabama citizen participation, educational pro-
issued a decision upholding the Air grams, evaluation committees, dispute
Force policy. Lieutenant Frontiero ap- resolution procedures, and special
pealed to the Supreme Court, which masters to address a problem and
overturned the lower court decision come up with a solution. The remedies
and required the Air Force to imple- do not specify a particular form of
ment a new policy. action. Performance standards call for
specific remedies — for example, a
OTHER IMPLEMENTERS certain number of housing units or
he implementation of judicial schools or a certain level of staffing
Virginia Military Institute cadets say grace before their evening meal of April 2, 2001, shortly
after the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit to force the school to drop the prayers.
The role of religion in public schools has been one of the most disputed issues before the U.S.
court system in the past 40 years.
170 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
U.S. Chief Justice Earl Warren, seen here in a 1961 photo. During his tenure, 1953-69, the
Supreme Court sparked major reforms in criminal procedure through landmark decisions,
including Gideon v. Wainwright and Miranda v. Arizona.
Many states routinely provided attor- have an attorney present during ques-
neys in such trials even before the tioning. Suspects must also be advised
Court’s decision. The other states that they have a right to remain silent
began to comply in a variety of ways. and that any statement they make may
Public defender programs were estab- be used in court; that if they cannot
lished in many regions. In other areas, afford an attorney, one will be provid-
local bar associations cooperated with ed at state expense; and that they have
judges to implement some method the right to stop answering questions
of complying with the Supreme at any time. These requirements are so
Court’s new policy. clearly stated that police departments
The impact of the Gideon decision have actually copied them down on
is clearer and more consistent than cards for officers to carry in their shirt
that of Mapp. One reason, no doubt, is pockets. Then, when suspects are
the fact that many states had already taken into custody, the police officers
implemented the policy called for by simply remove the card and read the
Gideon. It was simply more widely ac- suspects their rights.
cepted than the policy established by In terms of whether police
Mapp. The policy announced in officers read the Miranda rights to
Gideon was also more sharply defined persons they arrest, there has been a
than the one in Mapp. Although the high level of compliance with the
Court did not specify whether a public Supreme Court policy. Some re-
defender or a court-appointed lawyer searchers, however, have questioned
must be provided, it is still clear that the impact of Miranda because of the
the indigent defendant must have the method by which suspects may be ad-
help of an attorney. Also, the Supreme vised of their rights. It is one thing to
Court under the next chief justice, read to a person from a card; it is an-
Warren Burger (1969-86), did not re- other to explain what is meant by the
treat from the Warren Court’s policy High Court’s requirements and then
of providing an attorney for indigent try to make the suspect understand
defendants as it did in the search and them. Looked at in this manner, the
seizure area addressed by Mapp. All impact of the policy announced in
these factors add up to a more recog- Miranda is not quite as clear.
nizable impact for the policy an- The Burger Court did not show an
nounced in Gideon. inclination to lend its solid support to
In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme the Warren Court’s Miranda policy.
Court went a step further and ruled Although Miranda has not been over-
that police officers must advise sus- ruled, its impact has been limited
pects taken into custody of their con- somewhat. In Harris v. New York
stitutional rights, one of which is to (1971), for example, the Burger Court
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL POLICIES 173
ruled that statements made by an indi- In sum, the impact of the Supreme
vidual who had not been given the Mi- Court’s criminal justice policies has
randa warning could be used to chal- been mixed, for several reasons. In
lenge the credibility of his testimony at some instances ambiguity is a prob-
trial. Then, the Court, under the lead- lem. In other cases, less than solid sup-
ership of Chief Justice William Rehn- port for the policy may be evident
quist (1986- ), ruled in Davis v. United among justices or support erodes
States (1994) that police are not re- when one Court replaces another. All
quired to stop questioning a suspect these variables translate into greater
who makes an ambiguous request to discretion for the implementers.
have an attorney present.
Congress reacted to Miranda, two Abortion
years after the decision, by enacting In Roe v. Wade (1973) the Supreme
a statute that in essence made the Court ruled that a woman has an
admissibility of a suspect’s statements absolute right to an abortion during
turn solely on whether they were made the first trimester of pregnancy; that
voluntarily. The statute received little a state may regulate the abortion
attention until 1999 when the Fourth procedure during the second trimester
Circuit Court of Appeals, in a case in order to protect the mother’s
involving an alleged bank robber who health; and that, during the third
moved to suppress a statement he trimester, the state may regulate or
made to the FBI on grounds that he even prohibit abortions, except where
had not received “Miranda warnings” the life or health of the mother
before being interrogated, held that is endangered.
the statute was satisfied because his The reaction to this decision was
statement was voluntary. The court immediate, and primarily negative. It
of appeals decision raised the came in the form of letters to individ-
question whether the congressional ual justices, public speeches, the intro-
statute or the High Court’s Miranda duction of resolutions in Congress,
decision should be followed. On and the advocacy of “right to life”
June 26, 2000, the U.S. Supreme amendments in Congress. Given the
Court held that Miranda, being a controversial nature of the Court’s de-
constitutional decision of the Court, cision, hospitals did not wholeheart-
could not in effect be overruled by edly offer to support the decision by
an act of Congress. In other words, changing their abortion policies.
the Miranda decision still governs the Reaction to the Court’s abortion
admissibility of statements made policy has not only continued but also
during custodial interrogation in state has moved into new areas. Recent
and federal courts. presidential elections have seen the
174 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Since the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade abortion ruling, the battles between supporters
and opponents of abortion are being fought in Congress, at all levels of the judiciary, and in
the political arena.
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL POLICIES 175
THE CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES
The following text of the United States Constitution reflects the original
spelling and usage. Brackets [ ] indicate parts that have been changed or set
aside by amendments.
PREAMBLE:
ARTICLE. I.
Section. 1.
Section. 2.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of
twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and
who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall
be chosen.
actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of
the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten
Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The number of
Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State
shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be
made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three,
Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one,
Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight,
Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South
Carolina five, and Georgia three.
When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive
Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers;
and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Section. 3.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each
State, [chosen by the Legislature thereof,] for six Years; and each Senator shall
have one Vote.
No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty
Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not,
when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.
The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but
shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 179
The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore,
in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of
President of the United States.
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting
for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of
the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall
be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Section. 4.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and
Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations,
[except as to the Places of chusing Senators.]
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, [and such
Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December,] unless they shall by Law
appoint a different Day.
Section. 5.
Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of
its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do
Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be
authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner,
and under such Penalties as each House may provide.
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members
for disorderly Behaviour; and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a
Member.
180 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time
publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require
Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any
question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on
the Journal.
Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of
the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that
in which the two Houses shall be sitting.
Section. 6.
No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected,
be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States,
which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been
encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the
United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in
Office.
Section. 7.
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;
but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the
Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the
United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with
his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter
the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after
such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it
shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 181
Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and
House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of
Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and
before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being
disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House
of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the
Case of a Bill.
Section. 8.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,
and with the Indian Tribes;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the
Standard of Weights and Measures;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited
Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective
Writings and Discoveries;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and
Offences against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules
concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval
Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union,
suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for
governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United
States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers,
and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline
prescribed by Congress;
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into
Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this
Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department
or Officer thereof.
Section. 9.
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless
when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Capitation, [or other direct,] Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the
Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters
of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing
but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of
Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or
grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or
Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for
executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts,
laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of
the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and
Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage,
keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or
Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War,
unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of
delay.
ARTICLE. II.
Section. 1.
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may
direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and
Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no
Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit
under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
[The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two
Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State
with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 185
the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and
transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed
to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the
Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates,
and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number
of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole
Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such
Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of
Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President;
and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the
said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the
President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each
State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member
or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States
shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the
President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors
shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have
equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.]
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day
on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout
the United States.
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation,
which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which
186 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any
other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following
Oath or Affirmation: — “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully
execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my
Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the
United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the
actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of
the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject
relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to
grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in
Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to
make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he
shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall
appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the
supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose
Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be
established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of
such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the
Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen
during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire
at the End of their next Session.
Section. 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of
the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall
judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene
both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them,
with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 187
Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public
Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall
Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall
be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,
Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
ARTICLE. III.
Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court,
and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain
and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
their Offices during good Behaviour; and shall, at stated Times, receive for
their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their
Continuance in Office.
Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under
this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which
shall be made, under their Authority;— to all Cases affecting Ambassadors,
other public Ministers and Consuls;— to all Cases of admiralty and maritime
Jurisdiction;— to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—
to Controversies between two or more States;— [between a State and Citizens
of another State;]— between Citizens of different States,— between Citizens
of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between
a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, [Citizens or Subjects.]
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and
those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original
Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall
have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions,
and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
188 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and
such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been
committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at
such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against
them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No
Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two
Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no
Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except
during the Life of the Person attainted.
ARTICLE. IV.
Section. 1.
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records,
and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by
general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and
Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
Section. 2.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of
Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall
flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the
executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be
removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
[No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof,
escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation
therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up
on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.]
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 189
Section. 3.
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new
State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor
any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States,
without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of
the Congress.
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and
Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the
United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to
Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
Section. 4.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican
Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and
on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature
cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
ARTICLE. V.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary,
shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the
Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for
proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents
and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of
three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof,
as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;
Provided [that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One
thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and
fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and] that no State,
without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
ARTICLE. VI.
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of
this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this
Constitution, as under the Confederation.
190 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in
Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the
Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
ARTICLE. VII.
The Word, “the,” being interlined between the seventh and eighth Lines of the
first Page, The Word “Thirty” being partly written on an Erazure in the
fifteenth Line of the first Page, The Words “is tried” being interlined between
the thirty second and thirty third Lines of the first Page and the Word “the”
being interlined between the forty third and forty fourth Lines of the
second Page.
Attest William Jackson Secretary
AMENDMENT I
AMENDMENT II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
AMENDMENT III
AMENDMENT IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.
AMENDMENT V
AMENDMENT VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and
public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime
shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously
ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
194 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
AMENDMENT VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury,
shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.
AMENDMENT VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel
and unusual punishments inflicted.
AMENDMENT IX
AMENDMENT X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people.
AMENDMENT XI (1795)
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to
any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United
States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign
State.
The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for
President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an
inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots
the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for
as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as
President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number
of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 195
the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of
the Senate;—The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate
and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then
be counted;—The person having the greatest number of votes for President,
shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of
Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the
persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those
voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose
immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes
shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a
quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-
thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a
choice. {And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President
whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day
of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in
the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President}* —
The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the
Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors
appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest
numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for
the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and
a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person
constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of
Vice-President of the United States.
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
196 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein
they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor
deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services
in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither
the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation
incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any
claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations
and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
AMENDMENT XV (1870)
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or
previous condition of servitude.
Section 2.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from
whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States,
and without regard to any census or enumeration.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each
State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have
one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for
electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
198 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the
executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such
vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the
executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the
vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
Section 1.
After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or
transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or
the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the
jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.
Section 2.
The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce
this article by appropriate legislation.
Section 3.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
AMENDMENT XX (1933)
Section 1.
The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the
20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon
on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended
if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall
then begin.
Section 2.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting
shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint
a different day.
Section 3.
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the
President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become
President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for
the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify,
then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have
qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a
President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who
shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be
selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice
President shall have qualified.
Section 4.
The Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the
persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President
whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them, and for the case
of the death of any of the persons from whom the Senate may choose a Vice
President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.
200 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Section 5.
Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of October following the
ratification of this article.
Section 6.
Section 1.
Section 2.
The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of
the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in
violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Section 3.
Section 1.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and
no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for
more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected
President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But
this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 201
this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person
who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the
term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of
President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
Section 2.
Section 1.
The District constituting the seat of government of the United States shall
appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct:
Section 2.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other
election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice
202 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
Section 2.
Section 1.
Section 2.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President
shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a
majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3.
Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that
he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he
transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and
duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4.
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of
the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law
provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker
of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is
unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President
shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting
President.
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 203
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the
Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written
declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of
his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal
officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may
by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the
Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written
declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of
his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within
forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within
twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress
is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to
assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is
unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President
shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the
President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to
vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State on
account of age.
Section 2.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.
No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and
Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall
have intervened.
204 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
GLOSSARY
Habeas corpus. A writ (court order) Judicial review. The power of the
that is usually used to bring a prisoner judicial branch to declare acts of the
before the court to determine the executive and legislative branches
legality of his or her imprisonment. unconstitutional.
Law. A social norm that is sanctioned run in a retention election. Voters thus
in threat or in fact by the application determine whether the judge should
of physical force. The party that be retained for a full term.
exercises such physical force is
recognized by society as legitimately Misdemeanor. A petty crime.
having this kind of authority, such as a Punishment usually is confinement in
police officer. a city or county jail for less than a year.
Oral argument. An opportunity for Petit jury (or trial jury). A group of
lawyers to summarize their position citizens who hear the evidence
before the court and to answer the presented by both sides at trial and
judges’ questions. determine the facts in dispute.
BIBLIO GRAPHY
Feinman, Jay M. Law 101: Everything Federal Courts and What They Do
You Need to Know About the American http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/
Legal System. New York, NY: Oxford lookup/FCtsWhat.pdf/$file/
University Press, Inc., 2000. FCtsWhat.pdf
INDEX
A B
Abortion, 173–175 Bail, 98, 99
Actus reus, 95 Baker v. Carr, 69
Administrative law, 7, 12, 60 Bankruptcy, 122
quasi-judicial bodies, 130, 131 Bench trial, 106
Administrative Procedure Act, 12 Bill
Administrative law courts, 39 ... see Laws
Advisory opinions, 24, 63, 64, 81 Bill of information, 100
Advocates Bill of Rights
... see Lawyers bail, 98, 99
Affirmative action, 35, 36 bills of attainder, 95
Alternative dispute resolution, 127–131 counsel, assistance of, 79, 81–83, 106,
arbitration, 128, 129 160, 171–173
mediation, 128 double jeopardy, 58, 101, 106, 114,
mini-trial, 129 117
neutral fact-finding, 129 Eighth Amendment, 161
private judging, 130 ex post facto laws, 95
summary jury trial, 129, 130 Fifth Amendment, 13, 58, 99, 106
American Bar Association, 145, 147–149 First Amendment, 88, 161
Amicus curiae, 86–89 Fourth Amendment, 106
Anticipatory socialization, 150, 151 Miranda rights, 98, 99, 167, 170, 172,
Appeals, 116, 117, 139 173
Appellate courts public trial, 38, 105
... see Jurisdiction; U. S. Courts of self-incrimination, 106
Appeal; U. S. Supreme Court Seventh Amendment, 38, 131, 135
Arbitration, 128, 129 Sixth Amendment, 38, 105
Arraignment, 100, 101 speedy trial, 98, 99, 105
Arrest, 97 Tenth Amendment, 16
Article I, 9, 10, 39 text of, 192–194
Article II, 144, 149 witnesses, confronting, 98, 100, 106,
Article III, 20, 152, 153 108, 109
jurisdiction, 9, 24, 25, 63 Bills of attainder, 95
courts, creation of, 39, 144 Briefs, 86–89
Article IV, 69 Brown v. Board of Education, 16, 27, 86,
Article VI, 7, 8, 16 160, 165, 169
Articles of Confederation, 7 Burden of proof, 69, 70, 106
Assistance of counsel in criminal trial, 112
... see Counsel, assistance of Burger, Warren, 146, 172
Attorneys
... see Lawyers
INDEX 215
V
Venue, 132, 133
Verdict, 114, 138
ACKNOWLEDGMENT