Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sector
Prepared by:
Tanya Khammash,
CFA, CVA
Table of Contents
1.0
Executive Summary
2.0
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
3.0
14
14
14
19
4.0
26
26
26
26
28
29
29
5.0
30
6.0
31
7.0
33
33
34
35
The existing energy mix is heavily weighted in favour of oil and natural gas, which, combined, make
up 93.9% of the total energy mix in 2011. This breakdown of energy, however, provides an inaccurate
representation of the typical energy mix for the Kingdom, which has had a greater weighting of
natural gas in the past. Explosions on the Egyptian pipeline that supplies Jordan with the bulk of its
natural gas needs brought about a significant drop in imported gas from 2,152.3bcm in 2010 to a mere
872.7bcm in 2011. Because natural gas is utilised by the Kingdom for the generation of 80% of its
electrical power, this drop in natural gas supply had to be replaced with oil products, which drove up
the weighting of oil in the energy mix to 82.2% in 2011 from 64.9% in 2010.
Energy Mix - 2011
Imported
Electricity,
4.2%
Natural
Gas, 11.7%
Renewable
Energy,
2.0%
Nuclear,
6.0%
Natural
Gas,
29.0%
Crude Oil
&
Products,
82.2%
Renewable
Energy,
10.0%
Crude Oil
&
Products,
40.0%
Surging prices of energy in recent years have hiked up the cost of the energy subsidies provided by
the Jordanian Government, placing increasing pressure on the Government budget. To ease some of
this pressure, the Government has been gradually reducing the subsidies in place since 2005. In spite
of these efforts, however, the substitution of oil products for natural gas in 2011 and through most of
2012 has been detrimental to the budget, forcing the Governments hand at finally liberalising the
remaining subsidised oil products during November of this year. Replacing the blanket-subsidy that
had been in place with a cash-based aid program targeted at the lower-income segment of the
economy, this bold but necessary move is expected to reduce the energy subsidy bill from JOD800
million to around JOD300 million per annum. Other efforts with regards liberalisation have also
been made, with a series of privatisations taking place over the past decade, particularly in the
electricity segment of the sector, to encourage competition and efficiency in the market, as well as
attracting investment to the sector. Of the more recent liberalisation moves are the granting of a
renewable temporary 6-month distribution license to the Jordan Electrical Power Company following
the expiry of its distribution concession, albeit at similar terms to those in the concession, and the
granting of distribution rights of oil products to two other companies, Total and Manaseer Group, a
right that had been exclusively granted to the Jordan Petroleum Refinery in the past.
With limited indigenous energy sources, the dual impact of rising energy prices and increased
demand has continued to highlight the need to both diversify the Kingdoms energy mix and secure a
stable energy supply. The targeted energy mix according to the Master Plan relies on a relatively
ambitious utilisation of oil shale, which is hoped to contribute 14.0% to the total energy mix. Based
on estimates of oil shale reserves, Jordan is one of the five richest countries in terms of oil shale
reserves, with over 40 billion tonnes spread under around 60% of the Countrys surface. In spite of
these abundant reserves, the monetary and environmental costs of extracting these reserves has, up
until recently, been deemed too high. However, with oil prices at current levels, the required
investment into oil shale exploration and extraction are now viewed as justifiable. The production of
electricity through direct burning of oil shale is expected to commence by 2016, while retorting the
oil shale underground should begin production by 2020-2023. The utilisation of the oil shale reserves,
combined with plans to generate 6.0% of the Kingdoms energy needs through nuclear power, could
transform the Country from an energy importer to an energy exporter by 2030.
Other plans in the works include capitalising on the Kingdoms more natural resources in the form of
wind and solar power. While renewable energy already contributes 2.0% to the existing energy mix,
wind turbine and solar power projects are hoped to raise the contribution to 10.0% of the energy mix
by 2020. The Kingdom has enormous solar energy potential, a source of energy that remains largely
untapped. The recent adoption of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Law will help
promote private sector investment in renewable energy by providing incentives for investments.
The primary obstacles standing in the way of reaching the Master Plan targets are the capital
intensive nature of the investments needed, the technical knowledge required, and overcoming
environmental concerns in the case of oil shale and nuclear power. Nonetheless, interest in
investment in the sector has been high, with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
announcing that it has shortlisted 34 companies for investment in renewable energy projects from 66
companies that had submitted expressions of interest. Going forward, it remains to be seen the
extent to which the Government will facilitate the ease of investment in the sector and the monetary
and environmental impacts such investment will have on the Kingdom. To date, the Government has
fallen behind schedule with regards the Master Plan by around five years due to the investments
falling short of those previously foreseen. As a result, the Government is focusing on both raising its
inventory of oil and oil derivatives, through building storage tanks with a capacity to hold enough oil
to cover the Kingdoms need for a period of 60 days, as well as reining in current consumption.
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources is planning to build storage containers in Aqaba by
2014 to hold a capacity of 100 thousand tonnes of oil, as well as taking up the number of oil ports to
three by 2015. It also revealed its intent to resolve outstanding issues with the Jordan Petroleum
Refinery to enable it to attract a strategic investor to complete its fourth expansion project.
The Government has allocated a portion of a recent GCC grant to launch electricity generation
projects utilising wind and solar power, with a capacity ranging between 200MW and 300MW.
Arrangements are also being made, in collaboration with the Jordan River Foundation, to provide
affordable loans with low monthly repayment instalments to families wishing to buy solar panels for
their homes, which will eventually lead to a drop in electricity consumption.
The Government is also looking into options to rein in energy consumption, both through raising
prices of oil derivatives through its liberalisation and prices of electricity. Other ideas in hand are
driving restrictions, setting in place specific days in which odd-number-plated cars may be allowed
to drive and other days for even-number-plated car. Street lighting may be reduced by half on major
roads or cut out entirely on less busy roads, and scheduled blackouts may be in the pipeline if power
consumption is not contained soon.
Consumption
Growth
14,000
6%
12,000
5%
Asia
39.3%
Pacific
1.2% Africa
5.3%
Middle
East
5.4%
4%
10,000
3%
8,000
2%
6,000
1%
4,000
0%
2,000
-1%
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
-2%
2000
Europe
14.7%
CIS
8.3%
America
25.7%
Source: Enerdata
Nonetheless, the growth that did occur was largely driven by emerging markets, with China and India
registering consumption growth rates of 7.7% and 6.2% in 2011, respectively. China stands as the
largest energy consumer on a global scale, with its 2011 consumption registering at 2,638Mtoe. The
0.7% year-on-year drop in the United States consumption to 2,225Mtoe drove it down to second
position amongst the worlds largest energy consumers. Meanwhile, poor economic conditions in the
EU led to a more significant 3.2% decline in consumption.
In terms of energy consumption composition, the chart below highlights oil, coal and gas continuing
to make up the larger part of consumed energy, at 87.1% of the total. Coal has registered the fastest
growth amongst the fossil fuels, rising by 5.4% in 2011 to 7,304.2Mt, driven largely by Asian countries
such as China, which utilize coal for the generation of electricity. In 2011, China accounted for 45% of
the world increase in coal consumption, with a 9.7% year-on-year rise.
Renewables
Hydro-electricity 1.6%
6.4%
Nuclear Energy
4.9%
Coal
30.3%
Natural Gas
23.7%
Source: BP
In parallel, growth in energy production also decelerated, slumping to a rate of 2.7% in 2011, down
from 4.5% the previous year, according to Enerdata. Asia accounted for the larger share of
production, at 30.0% in 2011. Asias production grew by an impressive 5.7% over the 2000-2011 period
and 7.1% in 2010 alone, but, hand-in-hand with world production, also experienced a deceleration in
growth in 2011 to 3.7%. China again was the driver of the growth, producing 62.2% of Asias output,
registering a 7.1% rise in production. While this increase was more than sufficient to compensate for
the decline in Japans production following its earthquake, Chinas production for the year failed to
cover its own consumption.
World Energy Production
Production
Energy Consumption (Mtoe)
14,000
Growth
6%
12,000
5%
10,000
4%
Asia
30.0%
Pacific
2.6% Africa
8.2%
Middle
East
13.6%
3%
8,000
2%
6,000
1%
4,000
0%
2,000
-1%
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
-2%
2000
Europe
8.2%
CIS
12.9%
America
24.5%
Source: Enerdata
Europe also saw a 3.0% decline in production, while America sustained a 3.2% rise year-on-year.
Meanwhile, the loss of production in Libya, coupled with drops in production for both Algeria and
Egypt, led to a 5.7% decline in production in Africa. This was, however, more than offset by the
Middle East, which increased production by 10.1% to 1,802.9Mtoe, with Saudi Arabia, the UAE and
Qatar all producing record levels.
2.1 Oil
The strong economic growth over the period 2003 2008 drove global demand for oil, which led to a
rapid rise in oil prices, which peaked during the second quarter of 2008. The onset of the financial
crisis and global economic slowdown put a sledgehammer in the works, bringing about a sharp
(USD/bbl)
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
Oct-12
Jan-12
Apr-11
Jul-10
Oct-09
Jan-09
Apr-08
Jul-07
Oct-06
Jan-06
Apr-05
Jul-04
Oct-03
Jan-03
Apr-02
Jul-01
Jan-00
Oct-00
0.00
In terms of crude oil production, the Middle East and America are the primary producers, supplying
some 59.0% of the total in 2011. On a global scale, production increased by 1.8% and 1.3% in 2010 and
2011, respectively, following a 2.3% decline in 2009, to reach 4,029.8Mt.
Crude Oil & Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) Production and Consumption - 2011
Production
Consumption
1400
1200
1000
Mt
800
600
400
200
0
Europe
America
CIS
Asia
Pacific
Africa
Middle East
Source: Enerdata
Growth in production in the Middle Eastern countries, with Saudi Arabia registering a 13.4% increase
and the UAE and Kuwait each recording a 14.2% rise in 2011, helped offset the 9.1% drop in
production in Europe, and the 13.2% slump in African production. The United States, the third largest
producer of crude oil after Russia and Saudi Arabia, managed a 4.1% growth in production, while
Canada and China increased production by 4.9% and 0.3%, respectively. Russian production,
meanwhile, was relatively flat, rising by 0.9% in 2011.
Consumption of crude oil, meanwhile, increased by 0.5% in 2011 compared to growth of 2.3% in 2010,
as a result of continued poor economic performance and high prices of oil. America and Asia
accounted for 31.4% and 29.9% of global crude oil consumption in 2011, each seeing slight increases in
consumption that year. The consumption in America registered a 0.3% increase, while Asia saw its
consumption growth decelerate sharply to a mere 1.3% increase versus growth of 3.2% and 5.1% in
1200
Consumption
1000
bcm
800
600
400
200
0
Europe
America
CIS
Asia
Pacific
Africa
Middle East
Source: Enerdata
Global consumption declined in 2009 by 2.3% to 3,065.1bcm in response to both high gas prices and
weak economies. In 2010, the recovery in demand surpassed production, with an 8.2% increase in
consumption. Alongside the slowdown in production in 2011 was a slowdown in consumption growth
to 2.8%, reaching 3,394.5bcm. Weakened economies in Europe led to a 9.0% drop in gas
Oct-12
Jan-12
Apr-11
Jul-10
Oct-09
Jan-09
Apr-08
Jul-07
Oct-06
Jan-06
Apr-05
Jul-04
Oct-03
Jan-03
Apr-02
Jul-01
Oct-00
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Jan-00
Price ($/mmbtu)
Natural Gas, US
The price of natural gas highlights the slump in demand for natural gas that occurred in 2008 and
2009 as the economic crisis hit. While the price of US natural gas has continued to suffer, the Europe
natural gas prices have resumed their upward trend, but still fall significantly below the 2008 peaks.
In terms of liquefied natural gas (LNG), new sources appeared in the Middle East and Indonesia, and
the prices of LNG have been on a relatively consistent upturn since mid-2009.
2.3 Coal
Growth in coal has surpassed the growth in other fossil fuels, with production increasing by 5.3% in
2011. Asia, and more specifically China, is both the largest producer and consumer of coal in the
world, producing 4,496.3Mt of a total 7,585.8Mt in 2011, of which Chinas contribution is 3,427.3Mt.
While all regions of the world saw a rise in coal production, larger players, such as America and India,
saw a stabilisation in their production that year.
Coal and Ignite Production and Consumption - 2011
Mt
Production
Consumption
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Europe
America
CIS
Asia
Pacific
Africa
Middle East
Source: Enerdata
10
Oct-12
Jan-12
Apr-11
Jul-10
Oct-09
Jan-09
Apr-08
Jul-07
Oct-06
Jan-06
Apr-05
Jul-04
Oct-03
Jan-03
Apr-02
Jul-01
Oct-00
200.00
180.00
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
Jan-00
Price ($/mt)
Coal, Australian
2.4 Electricity
As the global recession came into play, electricity consumption, and thus production, was reigned in
during 2009, with production declining by a slight 0.5% year-on-year. Production recovered swiftly in
2010, rising by 5.9%, and continued to increase in 2011, reaching 22,005.8TWh (terawatt hours). Asia
and America are the largest producers of electricity, producing 8,409.9TWh and 6,384.4TWh
respectively in 2011. That year, electricity production in the United States dropped by 0.5%, allowing
China to overtake it as the worlds largest electricity producer, producing 21.2% of the world total.
China was also the primary contributor to the production growth, where it registered an impressive
11.7% increase in output. Japan, the third largest electricity producer in 2010, saw a 4.7% slump in
production in 2011 following the earthquake that hit it that year, pushing up Russias ranking to third
largest producer. Production in the Middle East rose by 4.4% as Iran and Saudi Arabia hiked up
production by 5.2% and 2.0%, respectively, while Africas output increased by 3.0% that year. Europe
was the only area to witness a decline in overall output, as production slumped in Germany, France,
the United Kingdom, and Spain, to name a few.
Driven by the rise in consumption in Asia, which increased by 10.4% and 8.3% in 2010 and 2011
respectively to reach 7,356.8TWh, global electricity consumption rose by 3.5% in 2011 to settle at
19,016.0TWh. Chinas consumption of 4,079.1TWh in 2011 surpassed that of the United States, at
3,852.1TWh, again allowing it to overtake the United States to rank as the worlds largest electricity
consumer. In spite of Japans 4.6% drop in consumption, it remains the third largest consumer in the
world. Russia, with consumption of 856.0TWh, stands as the worlds fourth largest consumer. Worth
noting, however, is that with Indias 16.2% growth in consumption of electricity in 2011 versus Russias
1.5% growth in consumption, coupled with its level of consumption of 828.3TWh, it stands to reason
that we should expect India to climb the ranks to replace Russias position in 2012. Overall, CIS
countries increased their demand by 2.5%, in contrast with Europe, whose demand dropped by 1.5%
to 3,315.2TWh, as a result of a significant 7.0% decline in consumption in France, the regions second
11
Consumption
9000
8000
7000
TWh
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Europe
America
CIS
Asia
Pacific
Africa
Middle East
Source: Enerdata
12
30%
50%
25%
40%
20%
30%
15%
20%
10%
10%
5%
0%
0%
Europe America
CIS
Asia
Asia
Source: Enerdata
13
Total Oil
0.9
5,978.3
117.6
(279.1)
6,140.7
Natural Gas
133.9
738.8
872.7
Electricity
16.5
312.9
15.4
313.9
Solar Energy
130.0
130.0
Total Energy
281.3
7,029.9
15.4
117.6
(279.1)
7,457.3
Oil Sector
(87.9)
Electricity
(2,246.2)
Transport & Distribution Losses
Cons. Energy Supply
213.1
Final Energy Consumption
3,593.5
Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
(872.7)
-
1,259.6
325.4
83.0
1,164.0
130.0
(87.9)
(1,859.2)
325.4
296.1
4,887.5
Primary energy consumption rose sharply in 2009 to 7,775 thousand toe from 7,388 thousand toe the
previous year, on account of a 14.4% increase in the consumption of natural gas. In 2010, however,
consumption levels decreased to 7,372 thousand toe as consumption of natural gas slumped by 25.8%
to 2,289 thousand toe. The political situation in Egypt, Jordans primary supplier of natural gas, led to
attacks on the gas supply line several times during 2011, cutting off Jordans supply of natural gas,
reducing its consumption further to 873 thousand toe. Natural gas is utilised by the Kingdom to
generate electricity, with some 80% of the electricity produced in Jordan depending on the imported
gas from Egypt. To compensate for the drop in natural gas, Jordan increased the amount of imported
electricity to 313 thousand toe from 168 thousand toe in 2010, as well as raising the import of crude oil
14
Renewable Energy
8,000
150
145
140
135
130
125
120
115
6,000
4,000
2,000
2008
2009
2010
2008
2011
Natural Gas
400
3,000
300
2,000
200
1,000
100
2009
2010
2011
Imported Electricity
4,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
2008
2009
2010
2011
The disruption in the supply of natural gas to the Kingdom, which led to a decline in the amounts
imported of around 65% in 2011 compared to 2010, coupled with the increasing burden of the high oil
prices, have highlighted the urgency of persevering with the energy master plan to diversify the
sources of energy going forward. In 2011, the total cost of imported crude oil, oil products and natural
gas reached a whopping JOD3.84 billion, up by 51% compared to 2010.
Composition of Jordan's Primary Energy Sources (2011 - 2020)
Crude Oil and Products
Renewable Energy
Natural Gas
Imported Electricity
Oil Shale
Nuclear
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2011
2015
2020
It is hoped that by 2020, the primary energy mix will be significantly less reliant on oil, with the mix
being weighted more heavily towards natural gas, oil shale, and nuclear energy. The complications
arising from the Egyptian gas line has prompted the Kingdom to search for alternative suppliers of
15
20.4
29.6
25.8
1,196
1,170
Sultani
24.0
31.6
69.3
1,130
989
Jurf EdDarawish
150.0
63.8
47.3
8,000
2,500
Attarat
Umm ElGhudran
226.0
45.0
53.2
11,300
10,400
Wadi
Maghar
40.0
40.5
31,600
21,600
The active stance taken by the Kingdom with regards oil shale extraction is evident in the agreements
being signed; Jordan signed a 44-year agreement with the Estonian company, Eesti Energia, to
produce 35,000 tonnes of oil share per day alongside the construction of a 460 megawatt oil shale
power plant by 2016. A British-Jordanian company, Karak International Oil, is currently exploring for
oil shale near Karak, in an initiative that is hoped to produce 15,000 barrels of oil shale per day.
Meanwhile, Royal Dutch Shell is utilising experimental technology to produce up to 40,000 barrels of
oil from the eastern desert within the next two decades. Moreover, a memorandum of understanding
has been signed with the Canadian company, Global Oil Shale Holdings (GOSH), regarding a 25-year,
USD32 billion project to provide up to 25% of the Kingdoms energy requirements. Exploration is to
occur in the region of Al-Attarat, which contains the bulk of the Kingdoms oil shale reserves.
By 2020, the energy strategy anticipates that oil shale will make up around 14% of the Kingdoms
energy mix. In spite of hype generated with regards the future outlook for oil shale, there remain a
number of obstacles facing the sector; firstly, the oil shale in Jordan has higher than average sulphur
content, which is a byproduct that will need to be captured, increasing the refining cost. Moreover, it
is feared that the electricity generated from oil shale may be more expensive than traditional fuels.
Moreover, much of the reserves are located deep within the ground, and thus cannot be mined by
conventional methods. And while the Royal Dutch Shell is utilising unconventional technologies in a
bid to extract these reserves, it still remains to be seen whether the oil shale will be economically
viable.
16
17
Crude Oil
Fuel Oil
2007
4,040
2008
3,796
91
2009
3,633
2010
3,485
307
2011
3,189
674
Growth 2011
(8.5%)
119.5%
Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
Liquefied
Gas
223
196
234
219
288
31.5%
Diesel
Gasoline
429
320
414
670
1,361
103.1%
Jet Fuel
166
141
231
400
540
35.0%
1
1
1
1
1
0.0%
Total
4,869
4,544
4,513
5,082
6,138
20.8%
As imports resumed growth in 2010 and 2011 and oil prices recovered, the Kingdoms energy bill
continued to skyrocket, reaching JOD2.04 billion in 2010 and a whopping 3.44 billion in 2011,
registering a 45.9% and 69.1% increase year-on-year, respectively. Oil consumption soared in 2011,
particularly due to increased usage of fuel oil in the generation of electricity to make up for
disruptions in the natural gas supply from Egypt.
Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products
Crude Oil
Petroleum Products
2,000,000
1,800,000
Imports (JOD '000)
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8M 2012
Based on the value of imported oil products for the first eight months of 2012, we can forecast an
estimate of 2012s oil bill for the entirety of 2012 at around JOD4.35 billion. Because of the removal of
subsidies by the Government on fuel prices in the final quarter of 2012, however, we anticipate a
slight reduction in oil demand towards year-end, which may result in an oil bill of slightly below our
estimate.
3.2.2 Natural Gas
Although the Kingdom does produce some natural gas from Al-Risha fields, with a total output of 6.4
billion CF in 2011, it relies heavily on imported natural gas from Egypt, which is used to produce 80%
of its electricity needs. In 2011, the natural gas supply was disrupted a total of ten times due to the
uprising in Egypt resulting in explosions on the gas pipeline that supplies both Jordan and Israel.
Consequently, the volume of gas imported declined by a substantial 61.9% to 873 toe compared to
18
'000 TOE
3,000
Transport,
41.0%
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
Household
, 23.0%
0
Oil
Natural Gas
Industry,
20.0%
The transportation sector accounts for the lions share of final energy consumption using 41.0% of the
total consumption in 2011, at 2.03Mtoe. Predictably, the sectors usage was entirely in the form of oil,
of which 56.5% was in the form of gasoline, 31.4% was in the form of diesel, and 12.1% was in the form
of Avtur. Households are the second largest consumers, at 23.0% of the total, and their consumption
19
2010
2011
2,500
Asphalt
Fuel Oil
Asphalt
Fuel Oil
Diesel
Kerosene
Avtur
Gasoline
Liquified
Gas
500
Diesel
500
1,000
Kerosene
1,000
1,500
Avtur
1,500
2,000
Liquified
Gas
2,000
Gasoline
2,500
The increase in prices of oil in international markets has put the governments budget under
significant pressure due to the subsidies in place on fuel prices. As prices continued to rise, the
Government took action in recent years to reduce the subsidies in place by liberalising a number of
oil products, adjusting the fuel prices on a monthly basis to reflect the movement in international
prices. The table below highlights the prices in place at year-end for 2009 through to 2011, as well as
the price of fuel as of December 1st 2012.
Local Prices of Oil Products
Unit
Gasoline, Unleaded 90
Gasoline, Unleaded 95
Diesel
Kerosene
LPG
Fuel Oil (Industry)
Avtur (Local Companies)
Avtur (Foreign Companies)
Avtur (Charter Flights)
Fuel Oil (Bunkers)
Diesel (Bunkers)
Asphalt
Fils/Litre
Fils/Litre
Fils/Litre
Fils/Litre
JD/Cylinder
JD/Tonne
Fils/Litre
Fils/Litre
Fils/Litre
JD/Tonne
Fils/Litre
JD/Tonne
31 Dec 2009
485
575
445
445
6.5
370
423
428
443
370
445
398
Price as of
31 Dec 2010 31 Dec 2011
655
620
795
795
545
515
545
515
6.5
6.5
397
501
512
614
517
619
532
634
397
511
545
670
426
537
1 Dec 2012
800
1,015
685
685
10
475
621
626
641
501.5
685
509
20
In November 2012, with a bold but necessary move by the Government, the prices of the remaining
products were liberalised as estimates of the cost of the subsidies on the budget reached between
JOD650 million and JOD800 million for the year. The Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources
explained that with the rise in prices of crude oil, a mere USD1.00 increase in prices of crude oil from
current prices drives up the annual subsidy by an additional USD40.00 million. The subsidy on
unleaded 90-octane gasoline reached 12.1%, giving an estimated annual subsidy of JOD100.00 million,
while the subsidy rate on diesel and kerosene amounted to 28.2%, giving an annual subsidy of
JOD425.00 million. Meanwhile, the subsidy on liquefied petroleum gas cylinders reached 51.9%,
giving a subsidy value for the year of around JOD95.00 million.
Instead of subsidising the price of oil products directly, the Government is instead implementing a
direct cash aid plan to compensate for the hike in prices. Individuals of a household earning less than
JOD10,000 per year will receive JOD70 each as compensation for the subsidy removal, for up to six
family members. This is anticipated to reduce the cost of subsidising fuel prices to around JOD300
million per year. The Government hopes to demonstrate its commitment to fiscal consolidation and
secure loans and aid from the IMF, Western and Arab countries.
A further part of the liberalisation process, was the signing of an agreement in November, which
granted Total and Manaseer Group licenses to distribute fuel across the Kingdom alongside the
Jordan Petroleum Refinery. Prior to this agreement, the Jordan Petroleum Refinery was the sole
distributor of oil products. The agreement stipulates that each company has the exclusive right to
market one-third of the Kingdoms oil products, namely both types of unleaded gasoline, diesel,
kerosene and avtur for a period of three years.
The Government is considering other methods to rein in fuel consumption, such as putting into place
a system of alternate driving days, whereby cars would be permitted to drive on alternate days
depending on whether their number plate ends in an even or an odd number. This would lead to a
rapid drop in consumption and would help reduce the number of vehicles on the streets. Other ideas
include scheduled blackouts and reduced street lighting, to reduce electricity consumption.
3.3.2 Electricity and Prices
Key Electricity Statistics
Electricity Fuel Consumption (000 toe)
Power Stations and Nominal Capacities (MW)
Electrical Energy Generated (GWh)
Electrical Energy Consumption (GWh)
Electrical Energy Consumption Per Capita (KWh)
Total Electrical Fuel Consumption/total Fuel Consumption (%)
System Peak Demand in Jordan (MW)
System Peak Load Interconnected System (MW)
No. of Employees in the Electricity Sector
No. of Consumers (000 Consumers)
Av. Purchase Price from Generation Sector (Fils/kWh)
toe: tonnes of energy
kgoe: kilograms of energy
MW: Megawatts
GWh: Gegawatt hour
Source: Electricity Regulatory Commission
2007
3,035
2,300
12,999
10,559
1,845
42
2,160
2,130
7,806
1,263
31.9
2008
3,282
2,612
13,768
11,555
1,975
45
2,260
2,230
8,084
1,352
45.9
2009
3,441
2,666
14,208
11,993
2,006
44
2,330
2,300
8,273
1,426
39.2
2010
3,262
3,069
14,683
12,871
2,106
44
2,670
2,650
7,729
1,498
52.6
2011
3,186
3,420
14,593
13,572
2,171
42
2,680
2,660
7,841
1,574
112.2
21
Demand for electricity has been on the rise in recent years, not only as the population demographics
expand, but also as prices of oil derivatives soar, making the use of electricity for heating a more
affordable option. Furthermore, the decline in prices of airconditioning units in recent years has
made them significantly more affordable, heightening the use of electricity for cooling in the summer
months, as well as for heating in the winter. The expansion of Ammans boundaries has also
necessitated the extension of electricity and lighting to areas previously uncatered for.
Electrical Energy Generation, Consumption, and Import
Electricity Generated
16,000
Electricity Consumed
Electricity Imported
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
The growth in consumption of electricity has surpassed the growth in electricity generated, with the
consumption rising from 10,550GWh in 2007 to 13,572GWh, a compounded annual growth rate of
6.5%, versus a rise in generated electricity from 12,999GWh to 14,593GWh over the same period at a
compounded annual growth rate of 2.9%. On a per capita basis, electricity consumption reached
2,172kWh in 2011, up from 1,843kWh in 2007, and up 3.1% from the previous year.
Electricity Consumption by Sector
100%
Others
90%
80%
Water Pumping
70%
Agricultural
60%
50%
Industrial
40%
Commercial
30%
20%
Governmental
10%
Households
0%
2009
2010
2011
Some 98.7% of the generated electricity is produced through the interconnected system, with Central
Electricity Generating Company (CEGCO), Samra Electric Power Generating Company (SEPGCO)
and AES - Jordan producing 55.2%, 24.2% and 15.5% of the total generated electicity in 2011. Electricity
22
14,477
14,406
7,655
3,467
3,238
15
36
66
8,051
3,534
2,267
463
13
11
66
213
206
187
13,768
14,208
14,683
14,593
534
13
363
20
446
224
1,458
281
14,316
14,591
15,353
16,331
318
139
58
86
13,998
14,452
15,295
16,245
Exported
Total Available Energy
2011
218
2010
Steam
Units
46.7%
Combined
Cycle
29.1%
Gas
Turbines /
Diesel
0.5%
Gas
Turbines /
Natural
Gas
23.0%
Electricity system losses have hovered over the past decade at above 17%, reaching as high as 19.1% in
2007. However, in 2010 and 2011, the losses as a percentage of generated electricity have declined to
15.8% and 16.5%, respectively, with the bulk of the losses arising on distribution.
3.3.3 System Peak Demand
The increase in number of subscribers, particularly in terms of residential users as a result of a
growing population, expansion of city boundaries, and the evolution of the residential compound
phenomenon in Jordan, has pushed up electricity demand in recent years. Moreover, the increasing
hot summers in Jordan, and the soaring price of fuel for heating has led to a surge in usage of airconditioners both for cooling and for heating, thereby applying substantial additional pressure on
electricity supply.
System Peak Demand
System Peak Demand in Jordan
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
23
Distribution Companies
Night Energy
JEPCO
EDCO
IDECO
Day Energy
JEPCO
EDCO
IDECO
Max. Load
(JOD/kW/Mnth)
From
01/01/2009
to
15/01/2010
From
16/01/2010
to
30/04/2011
From
01/05/2011
to
30/06/2011
From
01/07/2011
to
31/12/2011
From
01/01/2012
to
28/05/2012
From
29/05/2012
to
04/06/2012
From
05/06/2012
to Date
35.76
26.10
28.11
36.62
25.81
29.04
36.62
28.53
31.84
45.14
38.87
39.05
45.14
36.65
33.92
49.52
43.15
37.19
55.29
46.58
39.77
45.81
36.15
38.16
46.67
35.86
39.09
46.67
38.58
41.89
55.19
48.92
49.10
55.19
46.70
43.97
59.57
53.20
47.24
65.34
56.63
49.82
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
50.00
66.00
50.00
66.00
66.00
82.00
66.00
82.00
164.00
220.00
164.00
220.00
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
50.00
66.00
50.00
66.00
66.00
82.00
66.00
82.00
66.00
82.00
76.00
94.00
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
2.98
In 2011, the average purchase price of electricity for NEPCO was 112.2 fils/kWh compared to an
average selling price of 52.6 fils/kWh. This meant that the Company incurred a loss of 59.6 fils/kWh,
giving a total loss of JOD1,007 million for the 2011 fiscal year.
The Government is considering raising electricity prices by an average of 6% - 8% in a bid to close
NEPCOs budget deficit over the next eight years and to reduce the annual cost of energy subsidies.
Other proposals to rein in energy costs include reducing electricity use by cutting street lighting by
half on major roads, and blacking out roads that have little traffic. The Government is also
considering restricting the number of hours of lighting in public institutions, as well as other
electricity consuming activities. A last resort is scheduled blackouts.
24
From
14/03/2008
to
15/01/2010
From
16/01/2010
to
30/06/2011
From
01/07/2011
to
28/05/2012
From
29/05/2012
to
04/06/2012
From
05/06/2012
to Date
31.0
59.0
67.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
32.0
71.0
85.0
113.0
113.0
113.0
113.0
33.0
72.0
86.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
114.0
33.0
72.0
86.0
114.0
114.0
135.0
174.0
33.0
72.0
86.0
114.0
114.0
135.0
174.0
33.0
72.0
86.0
114.0
141.0
168.0
235.0
TV and Broadcasting
61.0
86.0
87.0
98.0
98.0
122.0
Commercial Sector
From 1-2000 kWh/Month
More than 2000 kWh/Month
63.0
63.0
86.0
86.0
87.0
87.0
91.0
106.0
91.0
265.0
91.0
265.0
Banking Sector
From 1-2000 kWh/Month
More than 2000 kWh/Month
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
87.0
87.0
91.0
106.0
227.0
265.0
227.0
265.0
Telecommunications Sector
From 1-2000 kWh/Month
More than 2000 kWh/Month
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
87.0
87.0
91.0
106.0
227.0
265.0
227.0
265.0
41.0
49.0
50.0
57.0
57.0
57.0
28.0
38.0
3.05
36.0
46.0
3.79
37.0
47.0
3.79
50.0
60.0
3.79
50.0
60.0
3.79
53.0
63.0
3.79
31.0
47.0
48.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
30.0
20.0
3.05
36.0
46.0
3.79
37.0
47.0
3.79
49.0
59.0
3.79
49.0
59.0
3.79
49.0
59.0
3.79
Water Pumping
40.0
41.0
42.0
54.0
66.0
66.0
60.0
86.0
87.0
98.0
127.0
127.0
45.0
56.0
3.05
70.0
81.0
3.79
71.0
82.0
3.79
82.0
93.0
3.79
102.0
116.0
3.79
102.0
116.0
3.79
Ports Sector
46.6
58.0
59.0
91.0
112.0
112.0
Streets Lighting
30.0
51.0
52.0
64.0
80.0
80.0
67.0
81.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
52.3
73.0
74.0
80.7
80.7
80.7
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
25
26
Consumers
Large Consumers
27
28
29
20.00
2011
2012*
Price (JOD)
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
JOPT
JOEP
IREL
The chart below illustrates the regression of the P/BV for the four listed health sector companies,
based on current price and book value per their most recently issued financial results, against their
return on equity (ROE) ratio, using annualised profits. Based on the particularly high R2 for the line
of best fit, it would appear that the regression plotted indicates a strong correlation between the
return on equity for these companies and their P/BV. A strong word of caution, however, is that the
low number of companies included in the regression may cause an invalid skew of the line of best fit.
Assuming that the relationship plotted is accurate for the average, the chart can highlight stocks that
are over- and under-priced based on their position on the chart. The companies that plot above the
line can be deemed relatively overvalued, while those that plot below the line are undervalued.
y = 0.1304x - 0.0912
R = 0.7011
IREL
JOPT
JOEP
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
P/BV (times)
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
30
General Index
2,800
11/2012
09/2012
07/2012
05/2012
03/2012
01/2012
1,600
11/2011
2,800
09/2011
1,800
07/2011
3,200
05/2011
2,000
03/2011
3,600
01/2011
2,200
11/2010
4,000
09/2010
2,400
07/2010
4,400
05/2010
2,600
03/2010
4,800
01/2010
5,200
The sky-rocketing prices of fuel prior to the financial crisis and economic slowdown was reflected on
the energy sector index, which rose to a high of 10,785.7 points in 2008, up 56.4% since the start of
the year. The market overall also experienced a strong upturn, rising to a peak of 5,043.7 points,
registering a 27.1% increase since the start of the year. Both indices dropped sharply during the
second half of 2008, closing at 3,863.5 points and 2,758.4 points, respectively, down by 64.2% and
45.3% from their peaks that year, and down 17.8% and 24.9% since the start of the year.
In 2009, the General Index continued to struggle, as bed news on the global economic front
continued to stream in. On the other hand, while declining prices of oil in the international market
caused an overall decline in the price of Jordan Petroleum Refinery (JOPT), which dropped from
JOD6.86 at the start of the year to JOD6.80 by year end, the electricity sector was thriving; Jordan
Electric Power (JOEP) saw its share price rise by 36.7% over the year, while Irbid District Electricity
Companys (IREL) stock rose to JOD9.00 by year end from JOD6.99, a positive change of 28.8%.
Neither index fared well during the first eight months of 2010, inspite of a brief recovery by the
General Index in early April. By August 30th, the Energy Sector Index had slumped by 10.6%, while the
General Index recorded a slightly higher 11.2% drop. In the final quarter of the year, however, both
indices picked up, closing at 4,414.8 points from 4,795.5 points at the start of the year for the Energy
Sector, and 2,373.6 points from 2,533.5 points for the General Index, still recording year-on-year
declines of 7.9% and 6.3%, respectively.
The market continued to suffer in 2011, but to a lesser extent than the energy sector which dropped to
a low of 3,024.0 on October 10th. However, while the General Index continued on its downward trend,
closing the year at 1,995.1 points, the Energy Sector Index managed a tremendous recovery in October
and November, on the back of rising trading volumes on the Jordan Petroleum Refinery stock which
pushed up prices from a low of JOD3.84 on October 3rd to a high of JOD6.28 on December 13th,
coupled with a rise in the price of Jordan Electric Power (JOEP) from a low of JOD2.53 on October 10th
to a high of JOD3.69 on November 15th. The two stocks combined to buoy the sector index back up
above the 4,000 point mark, ending the year at 4,075.1 points, albeit still down by 7.7% for the year.
Nonetheless, this compares favourably to the performance of the General Index, which registered a
year-on-year decline of 15.9%.
31
Daily Average
# of
Transactions
# of Shares
Value
Traded
(JOD)
# of
Transactions
# of Shares
JOPT
2011
87,490,273
32,077
16,721,965
355,652
130
67,975
2012*
48,565,255
22,370
8,633,188
204,056
94
36,274
2011
20,373,106
9,957
6,016,836
82,818
40
24,459
2012*
17,756,712
6,757
5,464,889
74,923
29
23,059
718,318
708
46,345
4,128
266
1,087,907
862
96,088
6,146
543
JOEP
IREL
2011
2012*
32
JOPT
JOD5.59
(5.1%)
JOD6.28 / JOD5.09
JOD178,880,000
87,490,275
16,721,965
355,652
67,975
52.26
10/2012
08/2012
06/2012
04/2012
0
02/2012
0.60
12/2011
100000
10/2011
1.60
08/2011
200000
06/2011
2.60
04/2011
300000
02/2011
3.60
12/2010
400000
10/2010
4.60
08/2010
500000
06/2010
5.60
04/2010
600000
02/2010
6.60
Number of Shares
Share Price
700000
12/2009
Price (JOD)
Trading Volume
7.60
Financial Indicators
Total Assets (JOD)
Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Bank (JOD)
Sales (JOD)
Gross Profit (JOD)
Operating Profit (JOD)
Profit after Tax (JOD)
EPS (JOD)
P/E (times)
P/BV (times)
ROA (%)
ROE (%)
N/A: Not available / Not Applicable
2011
1,286,683,227
86,581,400
3,496,622,509
157,633,141
161,904,148
21,853,669
0.683
8.6x
2.2x
2.1%
27.1%
H1 2012
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
33
JOEP
JOD3.18
(7.8%)
JOD3.66 / JOD2.70
JOD240,408,000
20,373,108
6,016,836
82,818
24,459
7.96
10/2012
08/2012
06/2012
0
04/2012
200000
0.60
02/2012
1.10
12/2011
400000
10/2011
1.60
08/2011
600000
06/2011
2.10
04/2011
800000
02/2011
2.60
12/2010
1000000
10/2010
1200000
3.10
08/2010
3.60
06/2010
1400000
04/2010
4.10
02/2010
1600000
Number of Shares
Share Price
4.60
12/2009
Price (JOD)
Trading Volume
Financial Indicators
Total Assets (JOD)
Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Bank (JOD)
Sales (JOD)
Gross Profit (JOD)
Operating Profit (JOD)
Profit after Tax (JOD)
EPS (JOD)
P/E (times)
P/BV (times)
ROA (%)
ROE (%)
*Based on Annualised Profits
2011
559,801,412
107,016,801
569,511,063
56,744,207
39,280,341
9,482,075
0.125
27.6x
2.4x
1.8%
9.0%
9M 2012
633,011,559
103,346,484
531,522,490
54,623,819
40,667,009
8,425,683
0.111
19.3x*
2.1x
1.9%*
10.7%*
34
IREL
JOD10.00
(14.5%)
JOD14.99 / JOD9.47
JOD60,000,000
718,318
46,345
4,128
266
1.16
10/2012
08/2012
06/2012
04/2012
02/2012
12/2011
10/2011
0
08/2011
0.60
06/2011
5000
04/2011
5.60
02/2011
10000
12/2010
10.60
10/2010
15000
08/2010
15.60
06/2010
20000
04/2010
20.60
02/2010
25000
Number of Shares
Share Price
25.60
12/2009
Price (JOD)
Trading Volume
Financial Indicators
Total Assets (JOD)
Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Bank (JOD)
Sales (JOD)
Gross Profit (JOD)
Operating Profit (JOD)
Profit after Tax (JOD)
EPS (JOD)
P/E (times)
P/BV (times)
ROA (%)
ROE (%)
*Based on Annualised Profits
2011
138,317,374
14,477,435
131,443,167
18,566,427
3,058,815
4,208,596
1.052
11.1x
3.2x
3.2%
28.5%
6M 2012
146,002,805
14,255,888
68,056,347
11,917,373
2,857,149
3,378,453
0.565
8.5x*
4.0x
4.8%*
47.0%*
35