Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There was much talk in section about the limitations of Nancy Ries’s
ethnographic study, and how those historical “failures” in some way negate her
anthropological or ethnographical lens rather than a strictly historical one. By doing so, it
will not seem so odd that Ries was attempting to use a “small set of cultural snapshots
taken at a particular historical moment [that] focused on certain kinds of expressions” and
expand those snapshots to be representative of all the citizens who had grown up living
together under the same societal conditions.1 In fact, Ries herself admits that her primary
informants were members of the urban “middle class” and that she “spoke with relatively
few manual laborers or rural workers … and had only two acquaintances among the
“highest” Moscow elites.”2 It must be noted that this is not a failure or a limitation in so
Russian culture from the majority or “everyman’s” perspective. Much study had already
been conducted on the Moscow elites when leaders such as Brezhnev or Gorbachev were
studied, and similarly, the rural workers had been analyzed extensively for books which
sought to express their plight. The dearth of information on the silent masses of Russia—
the middle class (although this term should be used loosely, according to Ries herself),
that was trying to vie for economic power and status like the elite class but that could also
1
Nancy Ries, Russian Talk (Cornell University Press, 19970, p. 5.
2
Ibid.
and the only way to study this amorphous group of people who did not necessarily
identify themselves collectively or meet weekly was to interview case studies and then
identify similarities in attitude and phrasing that appeared repeatedly. When Ries
discusses meeting Dusia, the elderly traveler who was visiting the gravesite of her
mother, the reader understands the reticence of the elder Russians. After all, none of Ries
and Dusia’s chatter dealt with any real issues of the former Soviet Union; rather, “most of
[their] talk about the Soviet Union centered around manifestations of weather in
Siberia.”3
Similarly, the discussions Ries held that are noted in the Epilogue reveal as much
about the individuals with whom Ries was dealing as they do about the Russian
atmosphere and collective attitudes in general. When two drunk workers pass by Ries as
she is photographing a casino and shout, “At the next corner, they’re waiting to arrest
you,” the pervasive paranoia about the Russian government cannot be denied.4 This
paranoia (albeit humorous in this instance) can validly be extended to the entire Russian
atmospheric community because everyone dealt with reactionary state policing at one
point in their lives. Ries is also validated in extending the persecutory and suffering
complexes of those whom she interviews to the idea of the typical Russian citizen.
Regardless of race, creed, or language, the majority of citizens of the former Soviet
Union would have suffered greatly from famine, censorship, or state violence.
Consequently, it is not absurd that Ries would notice a pattern of statements that
highlighted the Russian trope of “the more one suffered, the better a person” and
3
Ibid., p. 2.
4
Ibid., p. 197.
understand that this idea was not contained within just a small pocket of Russian
citizens.5
Furthermore, whether all Russian citizens verbalized these ideas or were simply
privy to the “Russian talk” during the time of perestroika, the chatter would have
nonetheless inculcated ideas of meaningful suffering for both. Since the types of jokes,
stories, litanies, and chatter that Ries encountered during her travels were “typical of
prevalent types of Russian expression in the later years of perestroika,” it can safely be
said that the majority of the Russian population would have encountered such ideas and
been challenged to mentally accommodate space for them within their overall
understandings of Russian rule. Therefore, Nancy Ries was not careless in using the
methodology she did; rather, it was the only true means by which she could have
successfully studied the atmosphere and general emotions of such an amorphous class
5
Ibid., p. 140.