Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What did James Joyce think about history? He boasted that Dublin
could be rebuilt from the pages of his novels, yet Joyce stopped
writing essays and reviews at an age when many authors are just
beginning to express themselves on important extra-literary
topics--and the Joyce that emerges in biographies and memoirs is
notoriously unreliable about history and politics.
In Joyce and the Subject of History, some of the brightest stars in
Joyce criticism tease out the historical implications embedded in
Joyce's oeuvre without conceding too much to the comprehensive
historical claims of the fictions themselves. At a time when much
historical work remains surprisingly under-theorized and much
theoretical work excludes the detail and rigor of serious historical
research, this collection attempts to bridge the gap between
history and theory, to reconceive the field of literary historical
scholarship as a whole. As an added resource, the book concludes
with Robert Spoo's extensive Annotated Bibliography of historical
work on Joyce.
Despite incorporating shared assumptions and common goals,
this collection was not designed to issue in consensus. "Joyce and
history" remains, inevitably, an open subject, and the essays in
this volume give an idea of just how open that subject is.
http://books.google.ro/books?id=dmm6I2PmtMYC&hl=ro&source=gbs_similarbooks
How might an IRA bomb and James Joyce's Ulysses have anything
in common? Could this masterpiece of modernism, written at the
violent moment of Ireland's national emergence, actually be the
first postcolonial novel? Exploring the relation of Ulysses to the
colony in which it is set, and to the nation being born as the book
was written, Enda Duffy uncovers a postcolonial modernism and
in so doing traces another unsuspected strain within the one-time
critical monolith. In the years between 1914 and 1921, as Joyce
was composing his text, Ireland became the first colony of the
British Empire to gain its independence in this century after a
violent anticolonial war. Duffy juxtaposes Ulysses with documents
and photographs from the archives of both empire and
insurgency, as well as with recent postcolonial literary texts, to
analyze the political unconscious of subversive strategies, twists
on class and gender, that render patriarchal colonialist culture
unfamiliar.
Ulysses, Duffy argues, is actually a guerrilla text, and here he
shows how Joyce's novel pinpoints colonial regimes of
surveillance, mocks imperial stereotypes of the "native," exposes
nationalism and other chauvinistic ideologies of "imagined
community" as throwbacks to the colonial ethos, and proposes
versions of a postcolonial subject. A significant intervention in the
massive "Joyce industry" founded on the rhetoric and aesthetics of high
modernism, Duffy's insights show us not only Ulysses, but also the origins of
postcolonial textuality, in a startling new way.
http://books.google.ro/books?id=A-Plsi_GA3cC&hl=ro&source=gbs_similarbooks
http://books.google.ro/books?id=Zn-r5DEF_68C&hl=ro&source=gbs_similarbooks