You are on page 1of 3

Digitally signed by

Joseph H Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik,
o, ou,
email=jz12345@earthlin
k.net, c=US
Location: La Verne,
California
Date: 2010.01.21
17:29:57 -08'00'
lJNlirEID STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Scott Huminski, )
Plaintiff, )
) CIVIL ACTION
v. )

HON. NANCY CORSqNES, et al,) Case No.1 :99-cv-160


Defendants. )

ORP()S~IlqJ" TO INTERVF.;~nION

NOW COMES, Scott Hurnins~i ("Huminski") and notwithstanding his assertion that this
litigation is completely void, illegitimate, null, invalid, unconstitutional, incapable of ratification
and that the presidingl Jud~le Jhouldl disqualify himself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 455
hereby replies to the pending mbtion to intervene (the "Motion").
The Motion contains zero assertions of how intervEmtion is supported by Rule 24 and
the plaintiff can not find any support for intervention under Rule 24. The text of the motion
contains issues that are pateritly frivololUs and mentions a bizarre unknown legal theory
I

called "Kozinski Fraud" and obscure cases in California pending in unknown Courts.

The gravamen of Hum,inski's clC\lim is solely related to the following State threat targeting this
litigation:
"The last claim involves ~ statement made to attorney Capriola [Huminski's attorney]
warning that the defendlant [Huminski] would be charged with additional crimes if he
did not clam down. TheI statement is a reference to the defendant's [Huminski's]
continued harassment of the victim and the investigating officer in this case through
the court proce$s. The dr.fendant has filed a civil action against the victim because of
his participation; in this criminal case. ... The statement was a proper warning made
through the de~endant's representative." (State's [Vermont's] Response to Motion to
Dismiss #4).

The Motion contains no theory of law or fact that are fil3motely similar to the instant matter.
I
Further the Motion cites various Court matters without identification of the Courts. The
Motion is patently frivolous, incdherent and an abuse of process.

WHERFORE, Intervention shm.lld be denied.


Dated at Gilbert, Ariz~na this 'lath day of ,january, 2010,

~ ~-T-----

Scott Hl;lminski, ~ro Se

2E324 S Bahama lDrive

Gilbert, IAZ 85295

CIERTIFl~:ATE. OF SEf;!YICE

Scott Huminski herebt certifies, that copi€!s of the above paper as filed in the
above-captioned matt¢r were mailed, First Class, prepaid to the following parties:

Lynn, Lynn & BLackm~an Shannon Bertrand Mark Patane, esq ..


Kenlan, Schwiebert & Facey Vt Atty General's Office
76 S1. Paul St, Suite 400 P.O" Box 578 109 State Street
Burlington, VT 05401 Rutlancl, vr 05702 Montpelier, VT 05609

Nancy Sheahan, esq Dav~d Cleary" esq. Joseph Zernik


271 S Union St. IP.O. Box 6740 1853 Foothill Blvd
Burlington, VT 05401 IRutland, Vermont 05702 La Verne, CA 91750
Sff-
Dated at Gilbert, Arizona this 1~th day of January, 2010.

~
~~
7

Aro
I

Scott HJminski,
1'----­
Se

2624 S Bahama
,
Drive
I

Gilbert, AZ
I
852!~5

- ~~Ao
~{~ "I.)

--
"j.'
;..J "",
,"'';'
].p J,,)
~~ i'"l
1f,:
-~.
l':'..
"'~
~:j ttl
,"",'..

'-r;) J:.
- ~
~~

{~ii
'-'4
~»)-
'i'
p.~
f"-' ...."

,
'N]I\ri'~j sS~\J. is'~ui 'lfsn

You might also like