Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nanoparticle Classes
Liposomes, 50- to 700-nm uni- or multilammelar vesicles
comprising lipid bilayer membranes surrounding an aqueous
interior, have been approved for enhancing the efficacy and
safety of drugs such as doxorubicin (eg, Doxil, ALZA
Corporation, Tibotec Therapeutics). Applications of liposomal technology as molecular imaging agents have been
reported for both ultrasound and MRI.9,10
Emulsions, which are chemically distinct from liposomes,
are oil-in-water type mixtures that are stabilized with surfactants to maintain size and shape. Perfluorocarbon core emulsions (200 to 400 nm) have been used for molecular imaging
with MRI, ultrasound, fluorescence, nuclear and computed
tomography imaging.4 6,11 For example, by incorporating
vast numbers of paramagnetic gadolinium complexes
(50 000) onto emulsion particles, the signal enhancement
possible for each binding site is magnified dramatically by a
factor of 106 over conventional paramagnetic extracellular
contrast agents.12,30 Modified micellar particles such as highdensity lipoprotein (HDL) or low-density lipoprotein particles have been used as molecular imaging agents for
MRI.14,15
Polymers (40 to 200 nm) offer a wide variety of flexible
designer approaches to construction of molecular imaging
agents and therapeutic delivery devices.16 Size and shape can
be tightly controlled, and functionalization of their surface
permits binding of myriad targeting and therapeutic moieties
for imaging, as well as drug and gene delivery. Polymers
made from poly hydroxy acids such as the copolymer of poly
Original received October 26, 2005; final version accepted December 8, 2005.
From Washington University, Departments of Medicine (S.A.W., P.W., G.L.) and Biomedical Engineering (S.A.W., A.M.N., G.L.), St Louis, Mo, and
Philips Medical Systems (S.C.), Best, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to Samuel A. Wickline, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8086, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110.
E-mail wicklines@aol.com
2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. is available at http://www.atvbaha.org
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000201069.47550.8b
435
Downloaded from http://atvb.ahajournals.org/
by guest on January 8, 2015
436
March 2006
Angiogenesis
Wickline et al
Applications of Nanotechnology
437
Figure 1. Ultrasound molecular imaging with nanoparticles. Left, top panels, Tissue factor (TF)-targeted nanoparticles binding to tissue
factor constitutively expressed on porcine endothelial cells in vitro. Bottom panels, Imaging the porcine carotid artery with 30 MHz
intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter after balloon injury. Note contrast enhancement heterogeneously distributed throughout media
of vessel representing binding of TF-targeted nanoparticles to medial smooth muscle cells expressing tissue factor epitopes (left), and
no enhancement in control injured segments treated with untargeted nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from Lanza et al and
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.29,36 Right, top panels, Four-chamber view of dog heart with experimental thrombus before (top left) and
after (top right) intravenous delivery and binding of echogenic liposomes targeted to fibrin/fibrinogen molecules. Bottom panels,
parasternal view of clot before (left) and after (right). LV indicates left ventricle. M indicates myocardium. Reprinted with permission
from Hamilton et al and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.33
438
March 2006
Figure 3. Left: Angiogenesis induced in
cholesterol-fed rabbits. Aortic cross sections imaged at 1.5T with v3-integrin
targeted nanoparticles. Note heterogeneous distribution in aortic cross sections
(false colored contrast enhancement), but
little enhancement in nontargeted rabbits
(v3-) or rabbits on a standard diet
(Chol-). Upper right, MRI signal modeling
illustrates that picomolar (100 pM) intravoxel concentrations of perfluorocarbonbased paramagnetic nanoparticles are
required to achieve a diagnostic contrastto-noise (CNR) ratio of 5 (blue dashed
line). Lower right, Immunochemical staining
for v3-integrin at the media-adventitia
border of aorta segments. Note abundant
red-brown vascular segments. Reprinted
with permission from Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins.45
nanoparticle contrast agents. Cells can be treated with superparamagnetic nanoparticles in vitro and then engrafted into
the selected location by local injection. The stem cells ingest
nanoparticles through endocytosis by various strategies, including coating the particles with dendrimers, transfection
agents, or antibodies/peptides,5557 which results in the intracellular accumulation of significant amounts of intact nanoparticles that then can exert a local susceptibility effect for
detection in vivo. These particles appear to be well tolerated
by cells over the long term, although the signal ultimately
dissipates as the cells divide and distribute the material or as
the particles are catabolized naturally. Along these lines,
Frank et al, 56 Bulte et al, 58 and others have demonstrated the
utility of stem cell tracking after in vitro preparation with
superparamagnetic nanoparticles. More recently, Kraitchman
et al59 demonstrated the ability to detect and track mesenchymal stem cells injected into necrotic regions of a pig heart at
1.5 T (Figure 4). Recent data indicating clinical feasibility for
MRI stem cell tracking was reported for labeled dendritic
cells injected into lymph nodes in patients with melanoma.60
Alternatively, the fluorine component of perfluorocarbonbased nanoparticles might be used to advantage for cell
imaging after particle ingestion. Our group originally demonstrated the concept of targeted nanoparticle fluorine imaging at 1.5T or 4.7T for detection of experimental thrombi or
small fibrin deposits in disrupted human carotid arteries using
nanoparticles made with perfluoroctylbromide, crown ether,
Wickline et al
Applications of Nanotechnology
439
Figure 5. Fluorine imaging with fibrin targeted perfluorocarbon-based nanoparticles. A, Optical image of an excised human carotid endarterectomy
sample shows asymmetrical plaque distribution, with areas of fat deposition (yellow). B, Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the fluorine image can be converted into a false color map of the nanoparticle binding and coregistered and overlaid on the proton image (in gray scale),
corresponding to the intravoxel concentration of nanoparticles bound to fibrin epitopes. Note quantitative false color mapping scale at right illustrating quantification of signal enhancement as a nanoparticle concentration expressed in nanomoles per voxel.
or other perfluorocarbon core materials (Figure 5).7,30 Subsequently, Ahrens et al61 used a crown ether preparation of
nanoparticles to load dendritic immune cells with no loss of
viability and illustrated the use of fluorine imaging at high
field strengths (11.7 T) for tracking cells after local and
systemic injection. Again, the advantage to this approach is
that no background signal exists because there is no appreciable amount of fluorine in the body to confound the signal
from the targeted cells.
Limitations
Although both molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics
are attractive subjects for clinical evaluation, the ultimate role
of these technical advances must be established in clinical
trials. To date, no solid proof of efficacy has been provided
with respect to altering courses of therapy or patient outcomes. The choice of imaging modalities also is broad and
remains to be worked out in practice, and it will depend on
cost, availability, and the specific application. As is the case
for any novel pharmacological agent undergoing clinical
trials, the use of nanoparticles also will require thorough
evaluation for pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and toxicity.
However, in the era of molecular medicine where early
diagnosis and personalized therapeutics may reduce risk and
save lives, the promise of these novel technologies and
approaches represents a new avenue to disease control that
appears extraordinarily compelling.
Conclusion
The combination of targeted drug delivery and molecular
imaging with MRI has the potential to revolutionize the field
of cardiology, as well as many other fields. Drug delivery
agents that are also quantifiable at the targeted site based on
imaging readouts may ultimately permit serial characterization of the molecular epitope expression and confirmation of
therapeutic efficacy, thereby promoting truly personalized
medical regimens. Rapid developments in genomics, molecular biology, and nanotechnology have energized the multidisciplinary field of molecular imaging, and we anticipate
440
March 2006
References
1. Britz-Cunningham SH, Adelstein SJ. Molecular targeting with radionuclides: state of the science. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:19451961.
2. Tsien RY. Imagining imagings future. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;
(suppl):SS16-SS21.
3. Lanza G, Wickline S. Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular
imaging and therapy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001;44:1331.
4. Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for
molecular imaging and therapy. Curr Prob Cardiol. 2003;28:625 653.
5. Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Molecular imaging, targeted therapeutics, and
nanoscience. J Cell Biochem. 2002;39:90 97.
6. Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Nanotechnology for molecular imaging and
targeted therapy. Circulation. 2003;107:10921095.
7. Morawski AM, Winter PM, Yu X, Fuhrhop R, Scott M, Hockett F,
Robertson JD, Gaffney PJ, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Quantitative
magnetic resonance immunohistochemistry with ligand-targeted 19F
nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:12551262.
8. Buxton DB, Lee SC, Wickline SA, Ferrari M, for the Working Group
Members. Recommendations of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute Nanotechnology Working Group. Circulation. 2003;108:
27372742.
9. Demos SM, Alkan-Onyuksel H, Kane BJ, Ramani K, Nagaraj A, Greene
R, Klegerman M, McPherson DD. In vivo targeting of acoustically
reflective liposomes for intravascular and transvascular ultrasonic
enhancement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:867 875.
10. Sipkins DA, Cheresh DA, Kazemi MR, Nevin LM, Bednarski MD, Li
KC. Detection of tumor angiogenesis in vivo by alphaVbeta3-targeted
magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Medicine. 1998;4:623 626.
11. Lanza GM, Winter P, Caruthers S, Schmeider A, Crowder K, Morawski
A, Zhang H, Scott MJ, Wickline SA. Novel paramagnetic contrast agents
for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2004;5:495507.
12. Flacke S, Fischer S, Scott MJ, Fuhrhop RJ, Allen JS, McLean M, Winter
P, Sicard GA, Gaffney PJ, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Novel MRI contrast
agent for molecular imaging of fibrin: implications for detecting vulnerable plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:1280 1285.
13. Deleted in proof.
14. Frias JC, Williams KJ, Fisher EA, Fayad ZA. Recombinant HDL-like
nanoparticles: a specific contrast agent for MRI of atherosclerotic
plaques. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:16316 16317.
15. Li H, Gray BD, Corbin I, Lebherz C, Choi H, Lund-Katz S, Wilson JM,
Glickson JD, Zhou R. MR and fluorescent imaging of low-density
lipoprotein receptors. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:12511259.
16. Hawker CJ, Wooley KL. The convergence of synthetic organic and
polymer chemistries. Science. 2005;309:1200 1205.
17. Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Jo SK, Bryant HL Jr, Brechbiel MW, Star
RA. Macromolecular MRI contrast agents with small dendrimers: pharmacokinetic differences between sizes and cores. Bioconjug Chem. 2003;
14:388 394.
18. Sato N, Kobayashi H, Hiraga A, Saga T, Togashi K, Konishi J, Brechbiel
MW. Pharmacokinetics and enhancement patterns of macromolecular
MR contrast agents with various sizes of polyamidoamine dendrimer
cores. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:1169 1173.
19. Schmitz SA, Coupland SE, Gust R, Winterhalter S, Wagner S, Kresse M,
Semmler W, Wolf KJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI of
atherosclerotic plaques in Watanabe hereditable hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Invest Radiol. 2000;35:460 471.
20. Koch AM, Reynolds F, Merkle HP, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Transport
of surface-modified nanoparticles through cell monolayers. Chembiochem. 2005;6:337345.
21. Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE,
Hazle JD, Halas NJ, West JL. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal
therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2003;100:13549 13554.
22. Loo C, Lin A, Hirsch L, Lee MH, Barton J, Halas N, West J, Drezek R.
Nanoshell-enabled photonics-based imaging and therapy of cancer.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3:33 40.
23. Cherukuri P, Bachilo SM, Litovsky SH, Weisman RB. Near-infrared
fluorescence microscopy of single-walled carbon nanotubes in phagocytic
cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15638 15639.
24. Barone PW, Baik S, Heller DA, Strano MS. Near-infrared optical sensors
based on single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat Mater. 2005;4:86 92.
25. Akerman ME, Chan WC, Laakkonen P, Bhatia SN, Ruoslahti E. Nanocrystal targeting in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:
1261712621.
26. Chen L, Zurita AJ, Ardelt PU, Giordano RJ, Arap W, Pasqualini R.
Design and validation of a bifunctional ligand display system for receptor
targeting. Chem Biol. 2004;11:10811091.
27. Gao X, Nie S. Quantum dot-encoded beads. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;
303:6171.
28. Lanza GM, Wallace KD, Scott MJ, Cacheris WP, Sheehan CK,
Abendschein DR, Christy DH, Sharkey AM, Miller JG, Gaffney PJ,
Wickline SA. A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad
biomedical application. Circulation. 1996;95:3334 3340.
29. Lanza GM, Abendschein DR, Hall CS, Scott MJ, Scherrer DE, Houseman
A, Miller JG, Wickline SA. In vivo molecular imaging of stretch-induced
tissue factor in carotid arteries with ligand-targeted nanoparticles. J Am
Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:608 614.
30. Lanza GM, Yu X, Winter PM, Abendschein DR, Karukstis KK, Scott MJ,
Fuhrhop RJ, Scherer DE, Wickline SA. Targeted antiproliferative drug
delivery to vascular smooth muscle cells with an MRI nanoparticle
contrast agent: implications for rational therapy of restenosis. Circulation.
2002;106:28422847.
31. Oltrona L, Speidel CM, Recchia D, Wickline SA, Eisenberg PR,
Abendschein DR. Inhibition of tissue factor-mediated coagulation
markedly attenuates stenosis after balloon-induced arterial injury in
minipigs. Circulation. 1997;96:646 652.
32. Morawski AM, Winter PM, Crowder KC, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW,
Scott MJ, Robertson JD, Abendschein DR, Lanza GM, Wickline SA.
Targeted nanoparticles for quantitative imaging of sparse molecular
epitopes with MRI. Magnc Reson Med. 2004;51:480 486.
33. Hamilton A, Huang SL, Warnick D, Stein A, Rabbat M, Madhav T, Kane
B, Nagaraj A, Klegerman M, MacDonald R, McPherson D. Left ventricular thrombus enhancement after intravenous injection of echogenic
immunoliposomes: studies in a new experimental model. Circulation.
2002;105:27722778.
34. Hamilton AJ, Huang SL, Warnick D, Rabbat M, Kane B, Nagaraj A,
Klegerman M, McPherson DD. Intravascular ultrasound molecular
imaging of atheroma components in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:
453 460.
35. Kelly KA, Allport JR, Tsourkas A, Shinde-Patil VR, Josephson L,
Weissleder R. Detection of vascular adhesion molecule-1 expression
using a novel multimodal nanoparticle. Circ Res. 2005;96:327336.
36. Lanza GM, Trousil RL, Wallace KD, Rose JH, Hall CS, Scott MJ, Miller
JG, Eisenberg PR, Gaffney PJ, Wickline SA. In vitro characterization of
a novel, tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic
microscopy. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:36653672.
37. Botnar RM, Buecker A, Wiethoff AJ, Parsons EC Jr, Katoh M,
Katsimaglis G, Weisskoff RM, Lauffer RB, Graham PB, Gunther RW,
Manning WJ, Spuentrup E. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of
coronary thrombosis using a fibrin-binding molecular magnetic resonance
contrast agent. Circulation. 2004;110:14631466.
38. Spuentrup E, Fausten B, Kinzel S, Wiethoff AJ, Botnar RM, Graham PB,
Haller S, Katoh M, Parsons EC Jr, Manning WJ, Busch T, Gunther RW,
Buecker A. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of atrial clots in a
swine model. Circulation. 2005;112:396 399.
39. Kerr JS, Mousa SA, Slee AM. Alpha(v)beta(3) integrin in angiogenesis
and restenosis. Drug News Perspect. 2001;14:143150.
40. Bishop GG, McPherson JA, Sanders JM, Hesselbacher SE, Feldman MJ,
McNamara CA, Gimple LW, Powers ER, Mousa SA, Sarembock IJ.
Selective alpha(v)beta(3)-receptor blockade reduces macrophage infiltration and restenosis after balloon angioplasty in the atherosclerotic
rabbit. Circulation. 2001;103:1906 1911.
41. Corjay MH, Diamond SM, Schlingmann KL, Gibbs SK, Stoltenborg JK,
Racanelli AL. Alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and osteopontin are coordinately upregulated at early time points in a rabbit model of neointima
formation. J Cell Biochem. 1999;75:492504.
42. Brooks PC, Stromblad S, Klemke R, Visscher D, Sarkar FH, Cheresh DA.
Antiintegrin alpha v beta 3 blocks human breast cancer growth and
angiogenesis in human skin. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:18151822.
43. Anderson SA, Rader RK, Westlin WF, Null C, Jackson D, Lanza CM,
Wickline SA, Kotyk JJ. Magnetic resonance contrast enhancement of
neovasculature with alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted nanoparticles. Magn Reson
Med. 2000;44:433 439.
Wickline et al
44. Winter PM, Caruthers SD, Kassner A, Harris TD, Chinen LK, Allen JS,
Lacy EK, Zhang H, Robertson JD, Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Molecular
imaging of angiogenesis in nascent Vx-2 rabbit tumors using a novel
alpha(nu)beta3-targeted nanoparticle and 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance
imaging. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5838 5843.
45. Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Zhang HY,
Williams TA, Allen JS, Lacy EK, Robertson JD, Lanza GM, Wickline
SA. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis
with alpha(v)beta(3)-Integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003;
108:2270 2274.
46. Moulton KS, Heller E, Konerding MA, Flynn E, Palinski W, Folkman J.
Angiogenesis inhibitors endostatin or TNP-470 reduce intimal neovascularization and plaque growth in apolipoprotien E-defficient mice. Circulation. 1999;99:1726 1732.
47. Tenaglia AN, Peters KG, Sketch MH Jr, Annex BH. Neovascularization
in atherectomy specimens from patients with unstable angina: implications for pathogenesis of unstable angina. Am Heart J. 1998;135:
10 14.
48. Wilson SH, Hermann J, Lermann LO, Holmes DR Jr, Napoli C, Ritman
EL, Lerman A. Simvastatin preserves the structure of coronary adventitial
vasa vasorum in experimental hypercholesterolemia independent of lipid
lowering. Circulation. 2002;105:415 418.
49. Zhang Y, Cliff WJ, Schoefl GI, Higgins G. Immunohistochemical study
of intimal microvessels in coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1993;
143:164 172.
50. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance
imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:
415 422.
51. Corot C, Petry KG, Trivedi R, Saleh A, Jonkmanns C, Le Bas J-F, Blezer
E, Rausch M, Brochet B, Foster-Gareau P, Baleriaux D, Gaillard S,
Dousset V. Macrophage imaging in central nervous system and in carotid
atheroscerotic plaque using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in
magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:619 625.
52. Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ,
Borgers M, Frederik PM, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human
atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance
imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:24532458.
53. Trivedi RA, U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Horsley J, Goddard
MJ, Skepper JN, Quartey G, Warburton E, Joubert I, Wang L, Kirkpatrick
PJ, Brown J, Gillard J. In vivo detection of macrophages in human carotid
atheroma: temporal dependence of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles
of iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2004;35:16311635.
54. Sirol M, Itskovich VV, Mani V, Aguinaldo JG, Fallon JT, Misselwitz B,
Weinmann HJ, Fuster V, Toussaint JF, Fayad ZA. Lipid-rich athero-
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
Applications of Nanotechnology
441
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
World Wide Web at:
http://atvb.ahajournals.org/content/26/3/435
Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published
in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the
Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for
which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web
page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights
Question and Answer document.
Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at:
http://www.lww.com/reprints
Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology is online
at:
http://atvb.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/