Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Portable-Handset Antennas
Using the Wheeler Cap
By Darioush Agahi and William Domino
Conexant Systems Inc.
The model
We model the antennas loss as a resistor
placed in series with the radiation resistance, as
shown in Figure 1. Since the model includes no
reactances, there is an implicit assumption that
the measurements must be taken at resonance.
The equations to be derived later require this
assumption.
The antenna efficiency (see Appendix) is
34 APPLIED MICROWAVE & WIRELESS
PRAD
PRAD
RRAD
=
=
Pin
PRAD + PLOSS RRAD + RLOSS
(1)
Note that it is immaterial whether the antenna is matched to the source resistance RS. While
it is certainly desirable and necessary to match
the antenna in actual use, the match is not part
of the problem of finding the above resistance
ratio. Therefore, we need only to relate the radiated power to that which is transferred forward
at the point shown in Figure 1. What is needed,
then, is a way to effectively separate the resistances RLOSS and RRAD by way of measurement,
so that the efficiency can be calculated.
L <<
(2)
PRAD
=
PRAD + PLOSS
S11WC
S11FS
1 S11FS
2
2
1 S
11FS 1 S11WC
2
1 S
11
FS
(5)
(6)
WC
= 0.966
S11
FS
= 0.823
( RRAD + RLOSS ) RS
( RRAD + RLOSS ) + RS
(9)
RLOSS 1 + S11WC
=
1 S11WC
RS
(10)
10 log(79.3%) = 1.0 dB
Such an efficiency is not atypical, and some antennas
have been measured to be even less than 50 percent efficient, which corresponds to a power loss of more than 3
dB. This power loss is a direct degradation of the receiver sensitivity and the transmitter output power, relative
to a cable-connection test. Such a transmitter power loss
would greatly degrade the handset s battery life, and, in
cellular systems that tend to be uplink-limited, it would
affect the ability of the handset to obtain service in marginal areas. In a 1/8-duty-cycle GSM system operating at
full transmit power of 2 ohms with a 50 percent efficient
antenna, the resistive heating of the antenna would
amount to 1/8 ohm!
As the antenna becomes longer, its radiation resistance increases, and the assumption of constant power
loss with and without the cap breaks down. In this case
a method of efficiency measurement that directly makes
use of the quantities RRAD and RLOSS is preferred.
Fortunately, modern vector network analyzers can provide a direct display of the impedance of a measured
device when performing a reflection coefficient measurement. So we make use of the resistance ratio in (1)
rather than the power ratio:
RRAD
RRAD + RLOSS
(11)
FS
1 S11FS
RS
RRAD
=
RRAD + RLOSS
= 1
1 + S11FS 1 + S11WC
1 S
1 S
11FS
11WC
1 + S11FS
1 S
11FS
(1 S )(1 + S )
(1 + S )(1 S )
11FS
11WC
11FS
11WC
(12)
(13)
(7)
S11
WC
= 0.626
S11
FS
= 0.325
RLOSS RS
RLOSS + RS
(8)
= 32.0% = 4.9 dB
The value of efficiency calculated by the constantpower-loss method is unnecessarily pessimistic. This
discrepancy between the methods occurs with longer
Appendix
The derivation of Equation (1), which also appears
in [2], page 48, is duplicated here. In the ideal case,
with no disturbances to the antenna, and a perfect
match, the input resistance represents the dissipation
loss of the antenna. This resistance represents the
sum of radiation resistance and ohmic resistance.
Rin = RRAD + RLOSS
(a1)
Conclusion
The Wheeler cap provides a convenient and reasonably accurate method of determining antenna efficiency.
For practical use, it consists of a cap over a ground
plane, usually of a simpler shape than the ideal halfsphere, such as a cylinder, maintaining the /2 radius.
Figure 8 shows a test fixture with a removable Wheeler
cap. The efficiency is best determined by measurement
of the antenna resistance with the cap in place and
removed, each taken at the resonance defined as the allreal impedance point.
Author information
Darioush Agahi is the Director of RF Systems
Engineering at Conexant Systems in Newport Beach,
CA. He may be reached via email at darioush.
agahi@conexant.com.
(a2)
Pin =
Or equivalently,
PRAD =
1
2
RRAD Iin
2
(a3)
PLOSS =
1
2
RLOSS Iin
2
(a4)
References
1. H. A. Wheeler, The Radiansphere Around a Small
Antenna, Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 47, August 1959.
2. W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna Theory
and Design, Wiley, New York, 1981.
3. R. H. Johnston, L. P. Ager, and J. G. McRory, A
New Small Antenna Efficiency Measurement Method,
IEEE 1996 Antennas and Propagation Society
International Symposium, Vol. 1.
1
2
Rin Iin
2
PRAD
PRAD
=
Pin
PRAD + PLOSS
1
2
RRAD Iin
2
=
1
1
2
2
RRAD Iin + RLOSS Iin
2
2
PRAD
PRAD + PLOSS