Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Turbine Engines
Mustapha Chaker
Cyrus B. Meher-Homji
Bechtel Corporation,
Houston, TX
There are numerous gas turbine applications in power generation and mechanical drive
service where power drop during the periods of high ambient temperature has a very
detrimental effect on the production of power or process throughput. Several geographical locations experience very high temperatures with low coincident relative humidities.
In such cases media evaporative cooling can be effectively applied as a low cost power
augmentation technique. Several misconceptions exist regarding their applicability to
evaporative cooling, the most prevalent being that they can only be applied in extremely
dry regions. This paper provides a detailed treatment of media evaporative cooling, discussing aspects that would be of value to an end user, including selection of climatic
design points, constructional features of evaporative coolers, thermodynamic aspects of
its effect on gas turbines, and approaches to improve reliability. It is hoped that this paper will be of value to plant designers, engineering companies, and operating companies
that are considering the use of media evaporative cooling. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4023939]
Introduction
Gas turbine output is a strong function of the ambient air temperature with power output dropping by 0.50.9% for every 1 C
rise in ambient temperature (0.30.5% per 1 F). There is also a
concurrent heat rate increase of about 5%.
Aeroderivative gas turbines exhibit even a greater sensitivity
to ambient temperature conditions. A representation of the
power boost capability for given inlet cooling potential for different types of gas turbines is shown in Fig. 1. The drop in performance due to high ambient temperatures can be further
aggravated with gas turbine recoverable and unrecoverable performance deterioration due to several factors as presented in
Meher-Homji et al. [1].
To recover the power lost due to high ambient temperature, it is
advantageous to deploy power augmentation technologies such as
evaporative cooling. This technology has been considered as a
simple and cost-effective method to increase power output and
also improve thermal efficiency.
This paper presents a detailed review of evaporative cooling
technology covering the thermodynamics and practical aspects
relating to design and operation.
Several papers have been published to address the media type
evaporative cooling [24].
(2)
T1DB T2DB
T1DB T2WB
(1)
systems [6]. Media type cooling requires more water for blow
down and water quality problems can lead to the removal of
media pads more frequently than the normal time frame. In some
cases, media has been replaced by fogging systems as described
by Ingistov and Chaker [7]. Media evaporative cooling systems
have successfully been used in industry for several years. The
basic layout of a media type system is shown in Fig. 2.
Media-based coolers typically have low installation and operating costs when compared to chilling systems. Operation costs
are low due to the inherent simplicity of the system and limited
auxiliary equipment needed. Potable water can be used especially
if a drift eliminator is utilized to minimize risks of water carryover. Typically media change out is required every 35 years,
depending on the quality of water used, media deterioration, and
number drying cycles.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 Typical inverse variation of relative humidity with ambient dry bulb temperature during the day
conclusion that very little evaporative cooling can be accomplished and has historically been the underlying cause of the
maxim that evaporative cooling is not possible in so-called high
humidity regions.
The dry bulb versus wet bulb relationship for a dry region
(Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) is shown in Fig. 4. This represents an
extremely dry area with cooling potentials of as high as 28 C
being available.
Corresponding data from what is considered a high humidity
region is shown in Fig. 5.
While it is true that the available cooling is lower than a low
humidity region, there is still a valuable cooling potential of
78 C available during the times when ambient temperatures are
high, which can result in power boosts of around 5%.
3.3 Selection of Climatic Design Point. The decision as to
which power augmentation approach should be deployed should
take into consideration the characteristic of the gas turbine, the
importance and nature of the augmented power, the cooling
potential and psychrometrics of the site, the payback period, and
the advantages and disadvantage of each technology. With evaporative coolers, the question as to the selection of the design point
is illustrated using Fig. 6, which shows a historical database of
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Fig. 8 Selection of design point for gas turbine inlet air cooling system showing insensitivity to evaporative cooler evaporative efficiency. All DBT values shown are greater than 41.6 C.
Fig. 9 Selection of design point for gas turbine inlet air cooling system (evaporative cooling) shown with actual site data;
DBT values shown greater than 35 C
Fig. 18 LM25001 G4 (simple cycle) (a) without evaporative cooling (above) and (b) with evaporative cooling
This approach is very data intensive with file sizes exceeding 60 MB.
Fig. 19 Cycle flow schematic Frame 6B combined cycle (no evaporative cooling) with condensing steam turbine. Net power
53 MW.
The cycle flow schematics are shown in Fig. 19 for the combined cycle configuration without the evaporative cooler and in
Fig. 20 with the evaporative cooler. The comparative performance
is shown in Table 1 below.
The power boost for range of gas turbine with and without of
evaporative cooling is shown in Table 2.
Design air velocities across the media should be kept moderate (below approximately 200 m/min).
Water distribution rates should be maintained between 0.7 to
2 liters per second per square meter of surface area of the distribution pad (this is a function of site humidity).
Downstream drift eliminators if used, will almost eliminate
risk of spray carryover.
Transactions of the ASME
Fig. 20
Frame 6B combined cycle with evaporative cooling. Net power 56,108 kW.
GT power
ST power
No evap cooler
53,079 kW
7784 kJ/kwhr
34,589 kW
19,614 kW
56,108 kW
7791 KJ/kWhr
37,250 kW
20,011 kW
Table 2
Id
Gas turbine
24
ABB GT 8
152 ABB GT 8C2
25
ABB GT 11N
110 ABB GT 11N2
41 ABB GT 13D2
70 ABB GT 13E2
18
Aln 501KB5
21
Aln 571KA
129 Asig ASE40
151 Asig ASE50A
48
EGT Typhoon
145 EGT Typhoon
33
EGT Tornado
1
GE 5371 PA
133
GE 6561 B
135 GE 7241 FA
148
GE 9171E
174 GE 9351 FA
Table 3
Power boost for range of gas turbines with and without evaporative cooling (DBT 5 32 C; RH 5 50%)
Net power Net power Power Power Power
cooling-off cooling on boost boost
boost
(KW)
(KW)
(%)
%/ C KW/ C
40,780
49,460
69,860
97,240
86,770
139,000
3,020
4,440
2,620
2,990
3,240
4,370
5,230
22,150
34,290
148,580
107,746
227,478
42,999
51,662
73,192
102,434
91,063
146,234
3,216
4,755
2,748
3,211
3,572
4,617
5,528
23,604
36,101
157,157
113,266
239,886
5.16
4.26
4.55
5.07
4.71
4.95
6.08
6.61
4.64
6.88
9.28
5.34
5.38
6.16
5.02
5.46
4.87
5.17
0.62
0.51
0.55
0.61
0.57
0.60
0.73
0.80
0.56
0.83
1.12
0.64
0.65
0.74
0.60
0.66
0.59
0.62
267.3
265.2
401.4
625.7
517.2
871.5
23.6
37.9
15.4
26.6
39.9
29.7
35.8
175.1
218.1
1033.3
665.0
1495.0
Constituent
Calcium hardness (CaCO3)
Total alkalinity (CaCO3)
Chlorides (Cl)
Silica (SiO2)
Iron (Fe) total
Vanadium (V)
Lead (Pb)
Oil and grease
Total dissolved solids
Suspended solids
pH
PPM 610%
50150
50150
<40
<150
<0.2
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<500
<5
78.5
around the sealing perimeter of the cooling media can produce air
jet velocities up to 10 m/s, increasing the potential for carryover,
which is why several users utilize a droplet eliminator after the
media section to avoid compressor erosion. This droplet eliminator
can induce an additional pressure drop. The water chemistry must
be carefully monitored and maintained to limit plugging of air passages by organic and inorganic deposits. Physical inspection of the
media during outages is recommended as is the provision of viewing windows both upstream and downstream of the media system.
Id
Gas turbine
113
GE 9391 G
159 GE LM2500PE
118 GE LM6000PC
161 GE LM6000SPT
101 KWU V64.3A
43
KWU V94.2
154
Mtsb 701 F
169 PW ST6L-813
137
Sol Taurus
132
Sol Saturn
188
Sol Centaur
97
Sol Mars
189
Sol Titan
44
TPM FT8
13
TPM FT4C
47
W251 B12
77
W501 D5A
74
W701 F
256,787
19,717
35,846
35,836
62,718
132,335
239,861
698
4,472
1,038
4,058
9,647
11,918
22,441
26,140
42,448
109,496
207,467
0.47
0.57
1.21
0.67
0.51
0.58
0.56
0.91
0.73
0.79
0.71
0.66
0.76
0.76
0.89
0.71
0.62
0.60
1197.2
111.6
433.2
241.7
322.6
768.1
1337.5
6.3
32.8
8.2
28.7
63.5
90.1
170.0
232.5
302.1
679.0
1251.4
6.2 Lowest Temperature for Cooling. Several OEMs publish a combination of relative humidity and temperature at which
anti icing measures are turned on. With evaporative media and
fogging applications the ending relative humidity is close to
100%; temperatures as low as 10 C can be utilized3. However, to
be on the very conservative side, temperatures of 12.8 C have
been considered. Many media evaporative coolers are designed to
shut off when the ambient temperature reaches 15 C.
6.3 Water Required to Saturate Air for Evaporative
Cooling. The required amount of water to cool the air to minimum wet bulb temperature (MWBT) of 15 C (solid lines) and
3
There are several considerations other than just calculating the intake
temperature static depression caused by air acceleration to Mach numbers of 0.5 to
0.8. There is also some heating (although smallof the order of 1 C) due to the
condensation that occurs and also due to heat transfer from the number 1 bearing,
etc.
Summary
Nomenclature
LNG
LPM
OEM
OS
RH
T
TMY
WBT
WBD
MWBT
References
[1] Meher-Homji, C. B., Chaker, M., and Motiwalla, H., 2001, Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration, Proceedings of the 30th Turbomachinery Symposium,
Houston, TX, September 1720.
[2] Johnson, R. S., 1988, The Theory and Operation of Evaporative Coolers for
Industrial Gas Turbine Installations, International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine
Congress, Amsterdam, Netherlands, June 59, ASME Paper No. 88-GT-41.
[3] Johnson, R. S., 1994, Set Up and Operation of a Recirculating Wetted Rigid
Media Evaporative Cooler Installed in a Gas Turbine Combustion Inlet Air System, International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The
Hague, Netherlands, June 1316.
[4] Hosseini, R., Beshkani, A., and Soltani M., 2007, Performance Improvement
of Gas Turbines of Fars (Iran) Combined Cycle Power Plant by Intake Air
Cooling Using a Media Evaporative Cooler, Energ. Convers. Man. J., 48, pp.
10551064.
[5] Jones, C., and Jacobs J. A., III, 2000, Economic and Technical Considerations
for Combined-Cycle Performance-Enhancement Options, GE Power Systems,
Schenectady, NY, Report No. GER-4200,
[6] Chaker, M., and Meher-Homji, C. B., 2007, Evaporative Cooling of Gas
Turbine Engines: Climatic Analysis and Application in High Humidity
Regions, ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air (GT2007),
Montreal, Canada, May 1417, ASME Paper No. GT2007-27866.
[7] Ingistov, S., and Chaker, M., 2011, Upgrade of the Intake Air Cooling System
for a Heavy-Duty Industrial Gas Turbine, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
2011, Vancouver Canada, June 610, GT2011-45398.
[8] Air Inlet System, Make it Right, 2010, Comb. Cycle J., 2Q(2010), pp. 2236.
[9] Al-Amiri, A. M. M., Zamzam, M. M., Chaker, M. A., and Meher-Homji C. B.,
2066, Application of Inlet Fogging for Power Augmentation of Mechanical
Drive Turbines in the Oil and Gas Sector, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo,
Barcelona, Spain, May 811, Paper No. GT2006-91054.
[10] Chaker, M., Meher-Homji, C., Mee, T., and Nicholson, A., 2003, Inlet Fogging
of Gas Turbine EnginesDetailed Climatic Analysis of Gas Turbine Evaporative Cooling Potential. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 125(1), pp. 300309.
[11] Chaker, M., and Meher-Homji, C. B., 2006, Inlet Fogging of Gas Turbine
EnginesDetailed Climatic Analysis of Gas Turbine Evaporative Cooling
Potential for International Locations, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 128(4),
pp. 815825.
[12] McNeilly, D., 2000, Application of Evaporative Coolers for Gas Turbine
Power Plants, International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress, Munich,
Germany, May 811, ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-303.
[13] Chaker, M., and Meher-Homji, C. B., 2011, Selection of Climatic Design
Points for Gas Turbine Power Augmentation, Proceedings of ASME Turbo
Expo 2011, Vancouver, Canada, June 610, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46463.
[14] Grace, B., 2011, Benefits of Inspecting and Commissioning Evaporative
Coolers, accessed April 3, 2011, www.ccj-online.com/inspection-overhauland-upgrade-of-evaporative-cooler