Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Journal for Nature Conservation xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Gabriel J. Castano-Villa
, Jaime V. Estevez a,b,d , Francisco E. Fontrbel c,
a
Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia
Grupo de Investigacin en Ecosistemas Tropicales, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia
Departamento de Ciencias Ecolgicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Chile
d
Departamento de Biologa, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia
b
c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 January 2014
Received in revised form 8 August 2014
Accepted 19 August 2014
Keywords:
Alnus acuminata
Bird conservation
Colombia
Community similarity
Species richness
Threatened species
a b s t r a c t
The gradual increase in reforested areas worldwide, as a strategy for mitigating native forest loss, has
stressed the need of assessing their real value as habitat for native species. Forest plantations, particularly those based on native species, could be valuable for conservation purposes, especially in heavily
fragmented and disturbed ecosystems. We evaluated the value of a monoculture of a native tree species,
the Andean alder (Alnus acuminata), for the conservation of avifauna in the Central Andes region, which is
considered a bird species diversity hotspot but also suffers from high anthropogenic disturbance levels.
Our results suggest that alder plantations are valuable for conservation from three points of view: (1)
they have similar or greater bird species richness and abundance than secondary native forests; (2) low
community similarities are found between this type of forest compared to secondary forest stands (with
27 species exclusive to alder plantations); and (3) three near threatened species (Odontophorus hyperythrus, Eriocnemis derbyi, and Cyanolyca viridicyanus). Further, 27 out of the 85 species found at the alder
plantations were of least concern but showing decreasing population trends. While forest plantations do
not replace native forests, they offer habitat for many bird species, some of them being of conservation
concern (i.e., included in an IUCN threat category) or with decreasing populations. Hence establishing
native species plantations among native forest remnants especially in heavily fragmented landscapes
could have a positive effect in the conservation of threatened avifauna.
2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Many agroecosystems may constitute a habitat for native
species in anthropogenic-altered landscapes. This is particularly
relevant because of increasing anthropogenic disturbances, reduction of native forest cover, and gradual biodiversity losses (Barlow
et al., 2007; Holbech, 2009; Peh et al., 2006), which lead many bird
populations to decrease. Few studies have evaluated the potential role of native forest plantations as habitat for threatened bird
species (Faria et al., 2007; Farwig et al., 2009; Proenca et al.,
2010). Those studies have provided valuable information about
the potential value and limitations of forest plantations for species
conservation.
Palmeras 3425, Nu
7800024, Santiago, Chile. Tel.: +56 2 29787438;
fax: +56 2 22727363.
E-mail address: fonturbel@gmail.com (F.E. Fontrbel).
One of the main limitations of the potential species conservation value of forest plantations is that these forest types are usually
associated with species with low forest dependency or habitat generalists, which are not of conservation concern. Thus many of the
species commonly found in those habitats are usually less sensitive to habitat disturbance, and very few are of worldwide or local
conservation concern (Farwig et al., 2009; Petit & Petit, 2003; Sodhi
et al., 2005). This appears to be limiting the conservation potential
of forest plantations, as extinction-prone species are usually forest
specialists (Renjifo, 1999; Ribon et al., 2003).
Within the Neotropics, the Colombian Central Andes region is
considered a conservation priority worldwide due to its high proportion of endemic bird species (Statterseld et al., 1998), loss and
fragmentation of its natural forests (Birdlife International, 2012),
and their associated local extinctions (Renjifo, 1999). In this region,
many monospecic forest plantations of native species have been
planted since 1970 in order to protect soils and watersheds, the
Andean alder (Alnus acuminata, Betulaceae) being a well-known
example (Murcia, 1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.08.010
1617-1381/ 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
G Model
JNC-25379; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Casta
no-Villa et al. / Journal for Nature Conservation xxx (2014) xxxxxx
G Model
JNC-25379; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
no-Villa et al. / Journal for Nature Conservation xxx (2014) xxxxxx
G.J. Casta
Results
We recorded a total of 103 bird species (Table S1, available in
Online Supplementary Material), 85 in the alder plantations and 76
in the secondary forest stands. Mean species richness, determined
by the rarefaction method, showed signicantly greater values in
alder plantations than in secondary forest stands using mist-netting
data (Fig. 1A), and comparing the curves at the same number of captures (222). However, species richness between plantations and
secondary forest stands was similar using the point count data
(Fig. 1B), as the 95% condence intervals of the rarefaction curves
overlapped at the same number of records (429). Rarefaction curves
obtained from point counts reached an asymptote, whereas those
obtained from mist-netting did not reach an asymptotic value.
This indicates that the sampling effort obtained by point counts
was enough for a proper recording of bird species in each forest
type, while mist-netting data should be interpreted with caution.
According to the richness estimators calculated, alder plantations
have 7097 species (considering both sampling methods), while
secondary forest stands have an expected richness of 6566 species
(Table 1). Overall abundance was signicantly greater in alder plantations compared to secondary forest stands (51.7 6.1 individuals
at the plantation and 29.3 2.8 at the native forest; F1,6 = 44.83,
p < 0.001) using capture data, but abundances were similar in point
counts (80.2 2.9 individuals at the plantation and 65.6 16.2 at
the native forest; F1,6 = 3.15, p = 0.126).
When analyzing species richness according to their population
trends and sensitivity to habitat disturbance categories, alder plantations had signicantly greater species richness for those species
with a decreasing population trend (13.5 1.5 species at the plantation and 10.1 1.9 at the native forest; F1,6 = 6.77, p = 0.040 for
point count data) as well as for species with a stable population
trend (11.0 3.0 at the plantation and 6.9 0.6 at the native forest; F1,6 = 7.12, p = 0.037 for mist-netting data); species with an
increasing population trend were similar between plantations and
secondary forest stands. Conversely, species with medium disturbance sensitivity had signicantly greater species richness in
alder plantations (15.7 2.1 at the plantation and 11.1 2.1 at the
native forest; F1,6 = 9.89, p = 0.020 for mist-netting data), while the
richness of those species with high sensitivity to habitat disturbance (the most affected by anthropogenic disturbance) was similar
between plantations and secondary forests (i.e., differences were
not signicantly different for both mist-nets and point counts). A
similar trend was observed for species abundance. Those species
Fig. 1. Rarefaction curves showing mean species richness with 95% condence intervals for (A) mist-netting data and (B) point count data.
with decreasing (23.9 2.0 at the plantation and 15.6 3.6 at the
native forest, F1,6 = 16.38, p = 0.007 based on mist-netting data) and
stable (21.0 4.7 at the plantation and 9.4 1.9 at the native forest,
F1,6 = 21.15, p = 0.004 based on mist-netting data) population trends
were signicantly more abundant in alder plantations, whereas
the abundance of species showing an increasing trend was similar between plantations and secondary forest stands. Species with
medium sensitivity to disturbance were signicantly more abundant in alder plantations (36.4 3.9 at the plantation and 19.9 2.7
at the native forest; F1,6 = 48.85, p < 0.001 based on mist-netting
data), while the abundance of species with low and high sensitivity to disturbance was similar between native forest and alder
plantation sites.
Avifauna composition between plantations and secondary forest stands was signicantly different with both mist-netting
(ANOSIM, R = 0.36, p < 0.001) and point count (R = 0.63, p < 0.001)
data. Of the 85 species recorded in alder plantations, 27 were
exclusive to this forest type, while 18 of 76 species were exclusive to secondary forest stands. Of those 18 species only found in
secondary forest stands, three species are considered of conservation concern according to IUCN: two categorized as vulnerable
(Leptosittaca branickii, and Hapalopsittaca amazonina); and one as
endangered (Scytalopus canus) by IUCN. On the other hand, two
near threatened species (Odontophorus hyperythrus and Eriocnemis derbyi) were found exclusively in the plantations, and the
near threatened species Cyanolyca viridicyanus was found in both
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Casta
no-Villa et al. / Journal for Nature Conservation xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Table 1
Observed and expected species richness for alder plantations and secondary forest stands estimated from mist-netting (MN) and point counts (PC). The expected species
richness was calculated by the mean value of the ACE, Chao1, Jack1, and Bootstrap estimators.
Forest type
Method
MN
PC
MN
PC
Number of records
414
642
234
525
Species richness
Sampling effectiveness
Observed
Expected
71
62
49
60
97
70
66
65
73%
89%
74%
92%
to conserve canopy-foraging frugivorous birds. However, we registered a total of 30 frugivorous bird species (mainly those belonging
to the families Ramphastidae, Turdidae, Thraupidae, and Emberizidae) at the alder plantations, which might be contributing to the
regeneration of the natural vegetation.
While we do not consider alder plantations as a surrogate for
secondary forests, in this case setting them among native forest
remnants could be valuable for bird conservation by contributing to
species richness, complementing other forest types, and harboring
threatened and potentially threatened species that are currently
showing decreasing population trends. Given the high anthropic
disturbance levels characterizing the Central Andes region, where
most of the natural forests have been impacted and the few
old-growth remaining stands are scattered in inaccessible areas,
establishing plantations with native species among second-growth
native forest remnants may help to mitigate the effects of habitat
loss and fragmentation, which are the most threatening factors for
the avifauna in this region.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Vicerrectora de Investigaciones
y Posgrados of the Universidad de Caldas (Grant no. 000414) and
to Fundacin HTM for providing funding. We are indebted to the
Central Hidroelctrica de Caldas S.A E.S.P. and to C.A. Franco for
arranging the logistics at the study site. L. Salazar, R. Santisteban,
A. Hoyos, A.D. Pineda, and F. Ramos assisted in the eld. The Corporacin Autnoma Regional de Caldas (CORPOCALDAS) granted
J.A. Simonetti, J.L. Tella,
the research permits. Comments of A. Vina,
and two anonymous reviewers helped to improve an earlier version of the manuscript. We appreciate the English correction made
by L. Eaton. GJCV and FEF were supported by CONICYT doctoral
fellowships.
References
Barlow, J., Mestre, L. A. M., Gardner, T. A., & Peres, C. A. (2007). The value of primary,
secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds. Biological Conservation,
136, 212231.
Birdlife International. (2012). Endemic bird area factsheet: Colombian inter-Andean
slopes. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org
Castano-Villa,
G. J., & Patino-Zabala,
J. C. (2008). Extinciones locales de aves en fragmentos de bosque en la regin de Santa Elena, Andes Centrales, Colombia. El
Hornero, 23, 2334.
Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community
structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 117143.
Colwell, R. K. (2009). EstimateS: Statistical stimation of species richness and shared
species from samples. Version 7.
Faria, D., Paciencia, M. L. B., Dixo, M., Laps, R. R., & Baumgarten, J. (2007). Ferns, frogs,
lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two
contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 23352357.
G Model
JNC-25379; No. of Pages 5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
no-Villa et al. / Journal for Nature Conservation xxx (2014) xxxxxx
G.J. Casta
Farwig, N., Sajita, N., & Bohning-Gaese, K. (2009). Corrigendum to conservation value
of forest plantations for bird communities in western Kenya [Forest Ecol. Manag.
255 (2008) 38853892]. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 17311734.
Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4,
379391.
Gotelli, N. J., & Entsminger, G. L. (2007). EcoSim: Null models software for ecology,
version 7.0. Burlintong VT, USA: Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear.
Greenberg, R., Bichier, P., & Angn, A. C. (2000). The conservation value for birds
of cacao plantations with diverse planted shade in Tabasco, Mexico. Animal
Conservation, 3, 105112.
Hammer, ., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics
software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4,
19.
Holbech, L. H. (2009). The conservation importance of luxuriant tree plantations for
lower storey forest birds in south-west Ghana. Bird Conservation International,
19, 287308.
Hutto, R. L., Pletschet, S. M., & Hendricks, P. (1986). A xed-radius point count method
for nonbreeding and breeding season use. Auk, 103, 593602.
IUCN. (2012). Red list of threatened species. Version 2012.1. http://www.
iucnredlist.org Accessed July 2012
Kattan, G. H., & Murcia, C. (2012). Ecological patterns and processes in noncommercial monospecic tree plantations in the tropical Andes. In J. A. Simonetti,
A. A. Grez, & C. F. Estades (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation in agroforestry landscapes: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 131144). Santiago de Chile: Editorial
Universitaria.
Loiselle, B. A., & Blake, J. G. (1992). Population variation in a tropical bird community.
Bioscience, 42, 838845.
Murcia, C. (1997). Evaluation of Andean alder as a catalyst for the recovery of tropical
cloud forests in Colombia. Forest Ecology and Management, 99, 163170.
Peh, K. S.-H., Sodhi, N. S., De Jong, J., Sekercioglu, C. H., Yap, C. A.-M., & Lim, S. L.H. (2006). Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern
Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 572581.
Petit, L. J., & Petit, D. R. (2003). Evaluating the importance of human-modied lands
for neotropical bird conservation. Conservation Biology, 17, 687694.
Proenca, V. M., Pereira, H. M., Guilherme, J., & Vicente, L. (2010). Plant and bird
diversity in natural forests and in native and exotic plantations in NW Portugal.
Acta Oecologica, 36, 219226.
Ramos, A. (2010). Estructura y composicin orstica de un bosque secundario y una
plantacin de aliso (Alnus acuminata), en los Andes Centrales Colombianos (Unpublished B.Sc. thesis). Universidad de Caldas.
Remsen, J. V., Cadena, C. D., Jaramillo, A., Nores, M., Pacheco, J. F., Prez-Emn, J.,
et al. (2014). Version 22-February-2014. A classication of the bird species of South
America. Baton Rouge LA, USA: American Ornithologists Union.
Renjifo, L. M. (1999). Composition changes in a subandean avifauna after long-term
forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 13, 11241139.
Ribon, R., Simon, J. E., & De Mattos, G. T. (2003). Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest
fragments of the Vicosa region, southeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 17,
18271839.
Rotenberg, J. A. (2007). Ecological role of a tree (Gmelina arborea) plantation in
Guatemala: An assessment of an alternative land use for tropical avian conservation. Auk, 124, 316330.
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Prawiradilaga, D. M., Tinulele, I., Putra, D. D., & Tan, T. H.
T. (2005). Land use and conservation value for forest birds in Central Sulawesi
(Indonesia). Biological Conservation, 122, 547558.
StatSoft. (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.
http://www.statsoft.com
Statterseld, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J., & Wege, D. C. (1998). Endemic bird areas of
the world: Priorities for biodiversity conservation. Cambridge: Burlington Press.
Stotz, D. F., Fitzpatrick, J. W., Parker, T. A., III, & Moskovist, D. K. (1996). Neotropical
birds: Ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Styring, A. R., Ragai, R., Unggang, J., Stuebing, R., Hosner, P. A., & Sheldon, F. H.
(2011). Bird community assembly in Bornean industrial tree plantations: Effects
of forest age and structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 531544.
Terborgh, J. (1985). Habitat selection in Amazonian birds. In M. L. Cody (Ed.), Habitat
selection in birds (pp. 311338). New York: Academic Press.
Volpato, G. H., Prado, V. M., & dos Anjos, L. (2010). What can tree plantations do for
forest birds in fragmented forest landscapes? A case study in southern Brazil.
Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 11561163.