Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Editorial, p. 615
693
694
Griva et al
METHODS
Participants
After approval by the hospitals Institutional Review
Board and signed consent were obtained, 145 participants
were recruited between October 1998 and October 2000
from 2 dialysis units under the direction of University
College and Royal Free Hospital Renal Department, London, UK (Fig 1). These included 52 patients on hospital
hemodialysis therapy, 25 on home hemodialysis therapy, and
68 on peritoneal dialysis therapy. Eligible participants had to
meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) 18 years or older;
(2) no history or clinically evident cerebrovascular disease;
(3) no major (uncorrected) visual or hearing impairments or
other sensory/motor impairments that prohibit them from
completing the scheduled assessments; (4) absence of acute
or chronic psychosis, documented depression, learning disabilities, and/or dementia (assessed from medical records,
abbreviated mental test scores,30 and staff review); (5)
currently stable, defined as not being acutely ill or hospitalized at the time of the assessment; (6) fluent in written and
spoken English; and (7) a minimum of 3 months on their
respective mode of treatment and dialysis techniques (eg,
the same dialysate or dialyzer if on hemodialysis therapy).
Measurements
Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors
Baseline data regarding sociodemographic factors (age,
sex, ethnicity, education, marital and employment status,
and household income), comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus [as both kidney disease and a comorbid condition in
addition to another kidney disease], heart failure, ischemic
heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, malignancy, liver
disease, and lung disease), primary cause of ESRD, treatment history/dialysis vintage, laboratory values, residual
glomerular filtration rate (calculated as mean renal clearance
of urine and creatinine corrected for body surface), and
dialysis dose by equilibrated Kt/V were collected at patient
entry into the study.
Dialysis modality at baseline was defined as the type of
dialysis used at 4 weeks after enrollment in the study. All
forms of peritoneal dialysis (continuous ambulatory and
automated peritoneal dialysis) were combined as a single
category. Hospital hemodialysis and home hemodialysis
patients were collapsed into one group. Patients were considered to have switched dialysis technique when they changed
from one type of dialysis to another and continued to use the
new technique for at least 30 days.
Blood samples were obtained after the completion of each
neuropsychological testing session to avoid interference of
venipuncture pain with the participants performance. All
blood samples were delivered to the respective laboratories
within 2 hours of collection. Laboratory analyses consisted
of measurement of urea, creatinine, hemoglobin, potassium,
phosphate, calcium, and albumin.
Renal severity and comorbid conditions were assessed
using the ESRD Severity Index (ESRD-SI), a renal-specific
medical recordderived index completed by a nephrologist
familiar with the patient. The ESRD-SI measures severity of
illness as a function of 11 conditions (heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, bone disease, respiratory disease, visual impairment, access and dialysis events, autonomic neuropathy,
gastrointestinal disease and diabetes, and other).31
The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used
to quantify comorbid illness. CCI scores were calculated using
the method previously described by Beddhu et al.32
695
Table 1. Description of Neuropsychological Tests
NP Tests
Attention/concentration
Attention/concentration and
executive function
Attention/concentration
Grooved Pegboard
Nonverbal memory/visual
perception and
visuocontructive abilities
Psychomotor speed/manual
dexterity
Test Description
Performance Measures
Time to completion in s
(dominant and
nondominant hands
measured separately)
Neuropsychological Assessment
To identify and exclude dementia cases, medical records
were reviewed and health care professionals involved in
patients care screened the preliminary pool of eligible
patients with regard to cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms (eg, mental confusion, aggression, and self-care behaviors). The abbreviated mental test scores30 were subsequently used as a general cognitive screening measure for
dementia to determine eligibility for the study (cutoff score
of 8/9, depending on years of education).
Participants were also administered a battery of 6 validated neuropsychological tests assessing multiple cognitive
domains34 (Table 1): Trail Making Test Part A,35 Trail
Making Test Part B,35 Symbol Digit Modalities,36 Rey
Auditory Verbal Learning Memory Test,37 Benton Visual
Retention Test,38 and Grooved Pegboard.39 Testing was
conducted approximately 1 hour before the dialysis run or
clinic appointment (peritoneal dialysis patients only) at the
hospital or at home (home hemodialysis patients only).
Cognitive impairment was operationalized using results of
neuropsychological tests. Published norms for each test
were used to classify results by number of standard deviations (SDs) less than age- and, when available, sex- and
education-adjusted mean values.40 Cognitive impairment
was defined as performance of 1 SD less than the normative mean value on at least 2 measures, in line with the
Mayo41 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Disorders,
Fourth Edition, criteria for mild neurocognitive disorder.42
QoL was measured using the UK version of the 36-Item
Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF36).43,44 The SF-36 is a generic multidimensional measure
of QoL that contains 8 subscales representing physical
functioning, social functioning, role limitations due to physi-
cal health problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, mental health, vitality, bodily pain, and general health
perceptions. These were combined into a Physical and a
Mental Component Summary score.45
Depressive symptoms were determined using the Beck
Depression Inventory-II (BDI),46 a well-validated 21-item
scale used extensively in ESRD populations. Scores can
range from 0-63, with a score 16 suggested as the optimal
cutoff for depression in patients with ESRD.47 In addition to
total BDI scores, the Cognitive Depression Index was computed using the subset of 14 cognitive/affective depression
items to control for the confounding contribution of somatic
symptoms of physical illness/uremia.48
Mortality
Patients were followed up for up to 7 years after enrollment. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Mortality status (date and cause of death) was monitored through
the hospitals computerized medical records system, individual case records, and contact with primary renal physicians. Causes of death were defined according to the ERAEDTA (European Renal AssociationEuropean Dialysis and
Transplant Association) coding system.49 Cardiovascular
mortality was defined as myocardial ischemia and infarction, cardiac arrest, hypertensive and other causes of cardiac
failure, cerebrovascular accident, hemorrhage from ruptured
vascular aneurysm, or mesenteric infarction. Survival time
was calculated as the number of months from the baseline
assessment until one of the following: death, kidney transplant, loss to follow-up, transfer out of the facility, or end of
the study observation period (February 2006, at a maximum
of 89 months).
Statistical Analysis
Mean values and frequencies of the parameters were
compared using analysis of variance or 2 test, as appropri-
696
Griva et al
RESULTS
Characteristics of Study Population
The total study sample surveyed included 145
participants, an 88.4% overall enrollment rate
(mean follow up, 64.3 27.4 [SD] months).
Cognitive dysfunction (scores in 2 neuropsychological tests 1 SD lower than normative values) was detected in 98 (67.6%) of the patients
assessed at baseline. Impairment was evident
across multiple domains, with the highest prevaTable 2. Frequency of Cognitive Impairment Across
Neuropsychological Tests
NP Test
None
Mild
(1-1.99 SDs
< norms)
TMT-A (%)
TMT-B (%)
SDMT-W (%)
SDMT-O (%)
RAVLT (%)
BVRT-C (%)
BVRT-E (%)
GP-D (%)
GP-ND (%)
78.6
51.0
67.9
57.6
51.0
39.3
43.4
57.2
52.1
15.9
24.2
25.5
37.6
26.2
35.2
29.6
24.0
27.8
Moderate
(2-2.99 SDs
< norms)
5.5
24.8
7.6
10.3
22.8
25.5
27.0
18.8
20.1
697
Cognitive
Impairment (n 98)
No Cognitive
Impairment (n 47)
Sociodemographic
Age (y)
Age at diagnosis (y)
Education (y)
Women (%)
Ethnicity (% white)
Married (%)
Employed (%)
Able to work (%)
50.12 14.26
44.52 16.01
12.37 5.41
35.2
64.1
60.0
35.9
43.4
51.81 14.05
46.61 15.66
12.29 6.09
37.8
59.2
62.2
24.5
30.6
46.6 14.2
40.17 16.01
12.53 3.68
29.8
74.5
55.3
59.6
70.2
0.04
0.02
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.001
0.04
Income ()
0-10,000 (%)
10,001-20,000 (%)
20,001-30,000 (%)
30,001 (%)
58.6
24.8
9.7
6.9
68.4
24.5
4.1
3.1
38.3
25.5
21.3
14.9
0.001
0.5
0.001
0.001
0.7
46.9
48.0
44.7
65.36 74.32
58.78 74.43
79.09 72.94
0.1
49.80 58.32
45.95 59.56
57.85 55.42
0.1
Laboratory data
Urea (mg/dL)
Potassium (mmol/L)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Calcium (mg/dL)
Phosphate (mg/dL)
Albumin (g/dL)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)
62.04 15.32
4.98 0.92
10.53 2.71
9.66 0.88
5.33 1.73
3.79 0.23
11.03 1.46
61.93 15.15
4.97 0.92
10.24 2.7
9.50 0.88
5.23 1.55
3.72 0.45
11.00 1.46
62.24 15.85
5.00 0.92
11.15 2.66
9.98 0.84
5.61 2.01
3.93 0.35
11.11 1.47
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.06
0.2
0.005
0.7
Clinical measures
Kt/Vurea/wk (HD)
Kt/Vurea/wk (PD)
Residual GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Karnofsky score
1.69 0.23
1.98 0.41
4.2 3.1
88.04 11.28
1.63 0.23
1.87 0.38
4.3 3.1
85.46 11.9
1.79 0.21
2.14 0.40
3.9 2.8
93.48 7.37
0.08
0.01
0.4
0.001
Comorbidity
ESRD-SI
CCI score
Hypertension (%)
Cardiac diseasea (%)
Vascular diseaseb (%)
Diabetes mellitus (%)
11.16 9.47
4.54 2.36
91.7
39.6
54.4
17.2
13.18 9.63
4.55 2.5
92.9
46.9
58.1
25.5
6.96 7.64
4.51 2.08
89.4
25.5
46.8
0.0
0.001
0.9
0.5
0.001
0.004
0.001
13.8
13.8
9.7
11.0
10.3
10.4
13.8
13.1
4.1
12.2
8.2
7.1
16.3
10.2
11.2
12.3
17.4
5.1
17.0
25.5
14.9
0.0
10.6
8.5
17.0
4.4
2.1
0.08
0.8
0.5
0.001
0.9
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.6
Note: Values are expressed as mean standard deviation or percentage. Abbreviations: CCI, Charlson Comorbidity
Index; ESRD-SI, End-Stage Renal Disease Severity Index; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneal
dialysis; RRT, renal replacement therapy.
a
History of coronary disease or congestive heart failure.
b
History of angina, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, or arterial
bypass surgery.
698
Griva et al
Table 4. Neuropsychological Test Scores of Patients With and Without Cognitive Impairment
Total (N 145)
Cognitive Impairment
(n 98)
No Cognitive Impairment
(n 47)
NP test scores
TMT-Aa
TMT-Ba
SDMT-Wb
SDMT-Ob
RAVLT-Tb
GP-Da
GP-NDa
BVRT-Cb
BVRT-Ec
52.21 32.43
98.57 49.39
41.10 12.59
45.39 13.73
39.03 10.71
91.02 31.97
1.49 0.50
4.92 2.16
8.56 5.02
61.86 34.85
114.11 52.14
36.15 10.86
39.69 11.55
36.06 10.66
100.56 34.31
1.68 0.47
4.21 2.00
10.10 5.08
32.09 10.94
66.18 17.84
51.43 9.29
57.28 9.77
45.21 7.85
70.69 9.47
1.09 0.28
6.40 1.69
5.34 2.98
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
Psychological measures
BDI
CDI
PCS score
MCS score
12.03 8.31
7.29 5.79
28.87 13.19
47.24 10.37
13.90 8.84
8.40 6.20
25.43 12.15
46.59 10.77
8.13 5.34
4.98 3.98
36.04 12.49
48.57 9.45
0.001
0.001
0.01
0.3
Total (N 145)
Cognitive
Impairment (n 98)
No Cognitive
Impairment (n 47)
56 (38.6)
64.33 27.38
48 (49.0)
58.29 29.11
6 (12.8)
76.91 17.94
0.001
0.001
699
1.0
Cumulativ
ve Survival
0.8
0.6
Neuropsychological
Impairment
0.4
No impairment
Impairment
No impairmentcensored
p
Impairment-censored
0.2
0.0
0
4
Time (y)
Figure 2. Unadjusted survival curves by cognitive functioning at baseline to the end of follow-up (n 145).
DISCUSSION
In this prospective study, we examined mortality
in a cohort of 145 prevalent dialysis patients and
performed a risk-factor analysis. After a 7-year
observation period, 38.6% of patients had died. The
observed mortality rate in this patient cohort was
lower than that reported in other registries and
study populations in the United States and Europe50-51 and may reflect sample differences. The
mean age and percentage of patients with diabetes
was lower in this study than in equivalent cohorts.50,51 Cardiovascular causes accounted for the
Wald
Age (/y)
0.01 0.57
Employment
0.10 0.06
ESRD-SI score
0.44 6.01
(/1-point increase)
Diabetes
0.72 6.19
PCS score (/1-point 0.45 5.81
increase)
NP impairment
0.93 4.01
HR
95% CI
Note: All variables are standardized to a standard deviation of 1 except for age and binary predictors (employment,
diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression, and neuropsychological impairment). Values are based on final step
of regression.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ESRD-SI, EndStage Renal Disease Severity Index; HR, hazard ratio; NP,
neuropsychological; PCS, Physical Component Summary.
700
Griva et al
and Lew70 showed that the risk of death increases exponentially as serum albumin concentration decreases from 4.0 to 2.5 g/dL. Therefore,
the notion that these clinical markers are independent predictors may be more likely to be true at
lower serum levels that do not meet clinical
targets.
In this sample, we did not confirm previous
findings of an increased risk of death associated
with depression.7,71,72 This may relate to differences in follow-up duration and assessment procedures. In this study, depression was measured
only at baseline without subsequent longitudinal
periodic assessment. Depressive mood can be
labile and it may be unreasonable to expect
depressive mood at a single measurement to be
strongly predictive of outcomes several years
later. Chronic persistent depressive mood with
multiple assessments during the course of the
study, rather than a single baseline measurement,
may be more likely to be associated with mortality.73,74
Although the findings of this study are novel,
several limitations must be acknowledged. In
comparison to other studies, sample size and
resulting number of deaths were small. This did
not allow us to perform separate analyses for
different dialysis modalities or various other subgroups. Thus, although the magnitude of the HR
is large, issues related to study power limitations
highlight the importance of revisiting the question with larger samples.
Second, the study sample comprised prevalent
dialysis patients. Given the excess early mortality in incident patients with ESRD,75 our cohort
likely represents a healthier patient population
who survived the initial dialysis period. In addition, because participants were selected on the
basis of strict eligibility criteria, results may not
be generalizable to the dialysis population as a
whole. The prevalence of cognitive impairment
and mortality may have been underestimated
because patients with a history of stroke were
excluded.
Another potential limitation is that the screening to exclude patients with dementia was based
on medical history and abbreviated test scores
with no formal cognitive/neurologic diagnostic
evaluation. Cases of (early) dementia may have
gone undetected and thereby biased the prevalence estimate of cognitive impairment. How-
701
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the renal staff for their support and the
patients for giving their time to complete the research
protocol.
Support: This research was supported by grants from
Alexandros Onassis Foundation (to Dr Griva) and the R.L.
Weston Institute for Neurological Studies of the UCL Medical School, both of which are gratefully acknowledged.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have
no relevant financial interests.
REFERENCES
1. Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, et al. The epidemic
of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly
patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol. 2003;60(5):352360.
2. Goodkin DA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Koenig KG, et al.
Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in HD
patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis
Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc
Nephrol. 2003;14(12):3270-3277.
3. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarank MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J
Kidney Dis. 1998;32(suppl 3):S112-119.
4. Kakiya R, Shoji T, Tsujimoto Y, et al. Body fat mass
and lean mass as predictors of survival in hemodialysis
patients. Kidney Int. 2006;70(3):549-556.
5. Cooper BA, Penne EL, Bartlett LH, et al. Protein
malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of vascular
events and mortality in ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(1):
61-66.
6. Kimmel P. Depression in patients with chronic renal
disease: what we know and what we need to know. Psychosom Res. 2002;53(4):951-956.
7. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Multiple
measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int.
2000;57(5):2093-2098.
8. Spinale J, Cohen SD, Khetpal P, et al. Spirituality,
social support, and survival in hemodialysis patients. Clin
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(6):1620-1627.
9. DeOreo PB. Hemodialysis patient-assessed functional
health status predicts continued survival, hospitalization,
and dialysis-attendance compliance. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;
30(2):204-212.
10. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, et al. Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition,
702
hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc
Nephrol. 2001;12(12):2797-2806.
11. Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, et al. Healthrelated quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study
(DOPPS). Kidney Int. 2003;64(1):339-349.
12. Lopez RK, Garcia Lopez FJ, de Alvaro MF, et al.
Perceived mental health at the start of dialysis as a predictor
of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal
disease (CALVIDIA Study). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;
19(9):2347-2353.
13. Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, LePain N, et al. Medical
Outcomes Study Short Form-36: a consistent and powerful
predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1286-1292.
14. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, et al. Mexican
Nephrology Collaborative Study Group. Health related quality of life predicts outcomes but is not affected by peritoneal
clearance: the ADEMEX trial. Kidney Int. 2005;67(3):
1093-2104.
15. Buchman AS, Tanne D, Boyle PA, Shah RC, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. Kidney function is associated with the
rate of cognitive decline in the elderly. Neurology. 2009;
73(12):920-927.
16. Elias MF, Elias PK, Seliger SL, Narsipur SS, Dore
GA, Robbins MA. Chronic kidney disease, creatinine and
cognitive functioning. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(8):
2446-2452.
17. Kurella TM, Wadley V, Yaffe K, et al. Kidney function and cognitive impairment in US adults: the Reasons for
Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS)
Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(2):227-234.
18. Pereira AA, Weiner DE, Scott T, et al. Cognitive
function in dialysis participants. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;
45(3):448-462.
19. Murray AM, Tupper DE, Knopman DS, et al. Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is common. Neurology. 2006;67(2):216-223.
20. Griva K, Newman S, Harrison M, et al. Acute neuropsychological changes in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Health Psychol. 2003;22(6):570-578.
21. Anstey KJ, Mack HA, von Sanden C. The relationship between cognition and mortality in patients with stroke,
coronary heart disease, or cancer. Eur Psychol. 2006;11(3):
182-195.
22. McGuire L, Ford E, Ajani U. The impact of cognitive
functioning on mortality and the development of functional
disability in older adults with diabetes: the second longitudinal study on aging. BMC Geriatr. 2006;6:8.
23. Zuccal G, Pedone C, Cesari M, et al. The effects of
cognitive impairment on mortality among hospitalized patients with heart failure. Am J Med. 2004;115(2):97-103.
24. McLennan SN, Pearson SA, Cameron J, et al. Prognostic importance of cognitive impairment in chronic heart
failure patients: does specialist management make a difference? Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8(5):494-501.
25. Liu IY, LaCroix AZ, White LR, et al. Cognitive
impairment and mortality: a study of possible confounders.
Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(1):136-143.
Griva et al
26. Shipley BA, Der G, Taylor MD, et al. Cognition and
all-cause mortality across the entire adult age range: Health
and Lifestyle Survey. Psychosom Med. 2006;68(1):17-24.
27. Osler M, Andersen AM, Due P, et al. Socioeconomic
position in early life, birth weight, childhood cognitive
function, and adult mortality: a longitudinal study of Danish
men born in 1953. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;
57(9):681-686.
28. Kurrela M, Mapes DC, Port FK, et al. Correlates and
outcomes of dementia among dialysis patients: the Dialysis
Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(9):2543-2548.
29. Rakowski DA, Caillard S, Agodoa LY, Abbott KC.
Dementia as a predictor of mortality in dialysis patients. Clin
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(5):1000-1005.
30. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for
assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing.
1972;1(4):233-238.
31. Craven J, Littlefield C, Rodin G, et al. The Endstage
Renal Disease Severity Index (ESRD-SI). Psychol Med.
1991;21(1):237-243.
32. Beddhu S, Bruns FJ, Saul M, Seddon P, Zeidel ML. A
simple comorbidity scale predicts clinical outcomes and
costs in dialysis patients. Am J Med. 2000;108(8):609-613.
33. Karnofsky DA, Burcherval JH. The clinical evaluation
of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed.
Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. New York,
NY: Columbia University Press; 1949:191-205.
34. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford,
UK: Oxford University Press; 2004.
35. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The HalsteadReitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press; 1993.
36. Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test Manual. Los
Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1973.
37. Rey A. Lexamen clinique en psychologie. Paris,
France: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964.
38. Benton AL. The Revised Benton Visual Retention
Test. New York, NY: Psychological Corp; 1974.
39. Matthews CG, Klove H. Instruction Manual for the
Adult Neuropsychology Test Battery. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Medical School; 1964.
40. Mitrushina MN, Boone KB, DElia LF. Handbook of
Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999.
41. Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC. Essentials of
the proper diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and major subtypes of dementia. Mayo Clin Proc.
2003;78(10):1290-1308.
42. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
43. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30(6):473483.
44. Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, et al.
Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J
Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(10):46-50.
45. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SK. Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. A Users Manual. Boston, MA:
The Health Institute; 1994.
703
dromethe heart of the matter. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
2002;17(suppl 18):S28-31.
63. Murray AM. The brain and the kidney connection: a
model of accelerated vascular cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2009;73(12):916-917.
64. Dufouil C, Alperovitch A, Tzourio C. Influence of
education on the relationship between white matter lesions
and cognition. Neurology. 2003;60(5):831-836.
65. Kuller LH, Shemanski L, Manolio T, et al. Relationship between ApoE, MRI findings, and cognitive function in
the Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1998;29(2):388398.
66. Desmond DW. Cognition and white matter lesions.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;13(suppl 2):S53-S57.
67. Kim CD, Lee HJ, Kim DJ, et al. High prevalence of
leukoaraiosis in cerebral magnetic resonance images of
patients on peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(1):
98-107.
68. Elkins JS, Knopman DS, Yaffe K, et al. Cognitive
function predicts first-time stroke and heart disease. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1750-1755.
69. De Fries, T Avendao M, Glymour MM. Level and
change in cognitive test scores predict risk of first stroke.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):499-505.
70. Lowrie EG, Lew NL. Death risk in hemodialysis
patients: the predictive value of commonly measured variables and an evaluation of death rate differences between
facilities. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;15(5):458-482.
71. Lopes AA, Bragg J, Young E, et al. Depression as a
predictor of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in the United States and Europe. Kidney Int.
2002;62(1):199-207.
72. Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, et al. Death or
hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney
Int. 2008;74(7):930-936.
73. Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, et al. Multiple
measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int.
2000;57(5):2093-2098.
74. Boulware LE, Liu Y, Fink NE, et al. Temporal relation among depression symptoms, cardiovascular disease
events, and mortality in end-stage renal disease: contribution
of reverse causality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(3):496504.
75. Bradbury BD, Fissell RB, Albert JM, et al. Predictors
of early mortality among incident vs hemodialysis patients
in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study
(DOPPS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(1):89-99.
76. Tuokko H, Frerichs R, Graham J, et al. Five-year
follow-up of cognitive impairment with no dementia. Arch
Neurol. 2003;60(4):577-582.
77. Camp CJ, Foss JW, Stevens AB, et al. Memory
training in normal and demented elderly populations: the
E-I-E-I-O model. Exp Aging Res. 1993;19(3):277-290.
78. Willis SL, Nesselroade CS. Long-term effect of fluid
ability training in old-old age. Dev Psychol. 1990;26(6):905910.