Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This equipment is capable of processing 3600 watermelons per hour. The tlow of the sorting process is as
382
;;:;:;:;;;;:;:;;;;:;:;;;;:;:;;;;;;;:-----u
height sensor
sens in
240
>
"-
unripe
ripe
overripe
240
240
C
~
"
240
a:
240
Q-
'"'lli"
240
240
240-r--'--'---,~-'--'---'--'~--'
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
260
300
Conclusion
Using an acoustic technique, watermelons can be tested
on-line for ripeness and hollowness. As a result. a sorting operation which had previously depended on the
intuition of an inspector can be carried out based on
consistent judgment criteria, enabling assured product
383
References
Chuma. Y .. Shiga. T. and Hikida. Y. 1977. Vibrational and
impact response properties of agricultural products for nondestructive evaluation of internal quality (Part I). Joumal of
the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery. 39(3).
335-341.(in Japanese)
384
Table 1.
----------------------------------_.-----Components
Average
S.D.
Mass (g)
Width (mm)
Height (mm)
Sugar content (Brix)
Acidity (mg!l00 mL)
Hardness of peel (kg)
Hardness of flesh (kg)
1275.70
114.20
142.70
14.08
3.02
3.18
1.30
58.70
3.50
7.70
Table 2.
U9
0.12
0.32
0.15
Materials
Components
Mass (g)
Width (mm)
Height (mm)
Sugar content (Brix)
Acidity (mg/lOO mL)
Hardness of peel (kg)
Hardness of flesh (kg)
Average
S.D.
J I 1.90
31.60
2.50
3.50
1.80
0.08
0.1 I
0.06
68.90
105.10
12.30
0.65
1.11
0.42
A Nireco model 6500 near infrared spectrophotometer was used to measure the infrared spectrum. The
pineapple was placed so that thc light beam was at right
angles to the surface of the fruit, which was covered with
* FANTEC
385
~ KO
Results of multiple regression analysis of some quality indices of the pineapple and the near infrared spectrum
Specific wavelength (nm)
Quality index
<)on
526
668
2280
A2
A}
/,4
696
878
2134
1200
2338
450
614
1138
716
664
772
I !40
MRa
SEh
0.825
0.686
0.460
0.568
0.822
0.107
0.314
0.135
Table 4.
Results of multiple regrc"ion analysis of some quality indices of mango fruits and near infrared spcetrum
Specific wavelength (nm)
Quality index
AI
A2
A3
I09R
620
172'1',
22<));
876
832
2462
2436
2418
1498
1018
1230
22')()
1668
6<)()
386
174~)
MR"
SEh
0.954
0.856
0.949
0.920
0.363
0.104
0.319
0.135
Conclusion
The results of this analysis suggest that it may be feasible to use NIR for measuring internal quality of pineapple and mango.
Portion
Sugar content
(Brix)
11.633
12.0()()
14.3CX)
14.267
14.7CX)
15)mO
14.078
References
Kohda. Y. 1990. Brand planning of agricultural products. hrand
influence of Okinawa grown pineapple in response to liheralisation. ed. National Association of Agricultural Reformation. Tokyo. Gyosei Publishing, Inc" 145-161.
ODA (Okinawa Development Agency) 1990. Annual statistics
of Okinawa agriculture. forestry and fisheries. 18th cd.
Naha. Okinawa Development Agency. Okinawa General
Bureau, 74-77.
OPG (Okinawa Prefecture Govel1lment) 1990. Annual statistics of Okinawa. Naha. Department of Okinawa Development Planning. Sec. of Statistics. 154-156.
Acidity
(mg/IOOmL)
1.979
1.929
2.097
2.013
1.9Rg
1.974
2.019
3S7
MINERAL analysis has been used to predict the susceptibility of fruits to physiological disorders (Perring
1986). The influence of fruit minerals on keeping quality and postharvest physiological disorders is well
known in apples, pears, and other temperate fruits, but
little is known on their effects in mango. It is now recognised that the mineral nutrient status of the fruit
during ripening is a major factor in postharvest storage.
Although the calcium content of Alphonso mangoes
with a postharvest ripening disorder known as 'spongy
tissue' has been shown to be lower than in healthy fruit,
there have been no studies of the the mineral composition of fruit during ripening, the object of the study
reported here.
References
Burdon. J.N., Moore, K.G. and Wainwright. H.G. 1991. Mincral distribution in mango fruit susceptible to the physiological disorder softnose. Scientia Horticulturae, 48, 329-336.
Gunjate. R.T., Tare, S.J .. Rangwala. A.D. and Limaye,V.P.
1979. Calcium content in Alphonso mango fruits in relation
to occurrence of spongy tissue. Joumal of Maharastra Agricultural University, 4{21.159-161.
Perring, M.A. 1986. Incidence of bitler pit in relation to the
calcium content of apples, calcium distribution in the fruit.
Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture. 37. 709-718.
Rangwala, A.[). 1975. Changes in chemical composition of
Alphonso mango fruits during ripening with particular reference to spongy tissue. M.Sc.(Ag) Thesis. Konkon Krishi
Vidyapccth, Dapoli, India.
Peel
xI
x2
YI
Y2
zi
z2
Mean
SEM
CDat5%
1991
1992
1991
109.0
75.0
53.8
65.7
53.2
52.7
38.8
64.0
1.20
4.57
liD
78.1
52.1
62.7
41.4
56.4
39.3
63.9
0.99
3.77
772.0
604.0
636.0
680.0
691.0
576.0
620.0
654.0
4.87
18.54
1992
1991
1992
1991
1992
797.0
614.0
648.0
652.0
684.0
603.0
631.0
616.0
4.10
15.61
42.4
35.8
34.7
41.1
38.1
38.4
39.7
38.6
0.48
1.82
23.1
19.6
18.6
20.1
19.2
19.8
18.6
19.8
0.35
1.33
156.8
94.6
127.2
130.8
150.9
116.1
140.8
131.0
US
5.18
147.9
87.4
122.2
128.3
141.2
108.2
116.4
121.7
1.05
3.99
x I and x2 are outer (near pee\) and inner (near endocarp) pulp tissue from Ihe basal part of Ihe fruit.
YI and Y2 are outer (near pee\) and inner (near endocarp) pulp tissue from the middle part of the fruit.
zi and z2 are outer (near peel) and inner (near endocarp) pulp tissue from the apical pari "fthe fruit.
389
390
Table 1.
Effect of pre- and postharvest calcium treatments on physicochemical changes in i\ Iphonso mango during ripening
and storage
Treatments
T"
I
5.75
4.21
4.05
2.91
2.85
2.72
T2
T,
T4
T5
T6
13.81
11.77
11.24
10.49
9.43
9.23
no
6.79
6.43
19
18.13
15.43
14.46
13.55
1288
12.61
6
7.38
9.33
11.62
13.34
14.81
15.57
1.97
3.59
4.29
5.24
5.77
6.31
19
2.11
2.17
:uo
3.66
3.98
6.07
6.70
7.17
7.88
8.49
8.96
6.59
0.59
0.87
1.19
2.02
2.29
2.62
19
0.34
0.57
1.14
1.44
1.81
a Initial values
bTl is control. T 2 and T J arc- prchan'cs\ sprays with 5000 and 10000 ppm ea and T 4, T5 and T6 an:' vacuum infiltrations with 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0%
Table 2.
Effect of pre- and postharvest calcium treatments on physicochemical changes in Alphonso mango during ripening
and storage
Treatments
6
Tlb
T2
T,
T4
T5
T6
2.15
2.45
2.65
3.16
3.31
3.54
19
0.17
0.85
0.76
1.44
1.63
1.83
0.25
0.34
0.73
0.89
1.02
6
16.71
15.42
14.48
12.62
11.49
11.08
16.73
19.09
20.54
17.57
17.87
18.21
19
17.63
18.83
16.55
16.97
17.63
2.29
2.06
I)U
1.72
1.56
1.32
3.13
4.51
4.79
3.72
3.79
4.09
19
3.96
4.21
3.20
3.54
3.69
a Initial values
bTl is control. T 2 and T j are prcharvt'st "prays \\'ifh 5000 and 10000 ppm ea and T 4, T5 and T6 are vacuulll infiltrations with 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0%
Table 3.
Effect of pre- and posthavest calcium treatments on physicochemical changes in Alphonso mango during ripening and
storage
Starch ( 14.0 I a)
Treatment
(%)
6
Tlb
T2
T,
T4
T5
T6
10.29
8.63
8.43
5.55
4.99
4.53
(%)
Ll.64
15.24
16.33
J 4.03
14.42
14.69
19
14.08
J 5.35
13.25
13.71
13.90
0.79
l.10
1.43
2.00
2.38
2.62
0.04
0.08
0.15
0.74
0.85
0.91
6
~404
6509
6230
4648
3766
35_,3
Shelf
life
(days)
19
17785
l~n64
19212
17785
16723
16430
18480
19222
17435
16980
16632
12
14
15
17
19
20
a Initial values
bTl is control. T2 and T3 are preharvesl sprays with 5000 and 10000 ppm Ca and T:j To and T6 are vacuum infiltrations with 2.0. 3.0. and 4.0%
CaCI 2 solutions re'pectively.
391
References
Anonymous 1991. Annual report. Lucknow. Central Institute
of Horticulture for Northern Plains, 72-80.
Bangerth, F. 1979. Calcium related physiological disorders of
plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 17,97-1 12.
Conway, W.S. and Sams, S.E. 1984. Possible mechanisms by
which postharvest calcium treatments reduce decay in
apples. Phytopathology, 24, 208-210.
Gautam, D.M. and Lizada, M.C.C. 1984. Internal breakdown in
Carabao mango subjected to modified atmospheres IV.
Postharvest Rest. Notes, 1(3).90--92.
Jones, R.G.W. and Lunt, a.R. 1967. The functions of calcium
in plants. Botanical Review, 33, 407-426.
Kumar, S. and Chauhan, K.S. 1989. Effect of ccrtain fungicides
and calcium compounds on postharvest behaviour of
Kinnow mandarin. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science, 18, 167-176.
Mootto, A. 1991. Effect of postharvest calcium chloride dips on
ripening changes in Julie mangoes. Tropical Science. 31.
243-248.
Poovaiah, B.W. 1986. Role of calcium in prolonging storage
life of fruits and vegetables. Food Technology, 40 ,86--8 9.
Ranganna, M. 1986. Hand book of analysing and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. New Delhi, Tata
McGraw Hill.
Shanthakrishnamurthy and Joshi, S.S 1989. Studies on low
temperature storage of Alphonso mango. Journal of Food
Science and Technology, 26, 177-180.
Singh, R.N., Gorak Singh, Mishra, J.S. and Rao. a.p. 1987.
Studies on the effect of pre and postharvest treatment of calcium nitrate and calcium chloride in the storage life of
Amrapali mango. Progressive Horticulturc, 19,( 1-2), 1-9.
Tirmazi, S.I.H. and Wills, R.B.H. 198 I. Retardation of ripening
of mangoes by postharvest application of calcium. Tropical
Agriculture, 58,137-141.
392
393
~-
100
40
~ 80
c-
"6 60
Eo
"
~ 40
:.
:ffi
10
20
Q)
ct
0-
T--
- 1
Jan
F~b
J~n
Jul Aug
S~p
Oct
N~v
Dec
120
40
~100
80
E 60
:0
c-
"":.
Q)
~Q)
10
0_
40
ct 20
-T
-----r--~~-
~'-I
1------1
- -,--
Crop
Shell' life
(days)
Mango Uvl([ngijira indiCil L.) Var. Baneshan
PLW"
('X)
Room temrerature
Shell life
(days)
PLW
('Ii)
5.04
14.99
20
2.50
14
4.XO
15
4.00
10
13.6_,
14
9.46
10
20)17
25
6.00
11
25.00
18
1.72
S.70
Sapota (!\chrus
a PL\V
:(1)(110
Phy"iologicallo'-." in weight
394
-- 1991. Annual Report. Indo-USAID sub project on post harvest technology of horticultural crops. New Delhi. Indian
Council of Agricultural Research, Division of Fruits and
Horticultural Technology.
Pal. R.K. and Roy. S.K. 1988 . Zero-energy cool chamber for
maintaining post harvest quality of carrot (Daucus carrola
L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 58. 665-667.
Roy, S.K. 1984. Post harvest storage of fruits and vegetables in
a specially designed built in space. In: Proceedings international workshop on energy in building. 2-7 April 1984.
Roorkee. India. Central Building Research Institute.
Roy. S.K .. Chakrabarti. A.K. and Pal. R.K .. ed. 1992. Final
report on Indo-USAID sub project on post harvest technology of fruits and vegetables (Oct. 1985-Mar. 1991). New
Oclhi. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 278 p. +
appendix.
Roy, S.K. and Khurdiya, D.S. 1986. Studies on evaporatively
cooled zero energy input cool chamber for storage of horticultural produce. Indian Food Packer, 40(6), 26-31.
Roy, S.K. and Pal, R.K. 1989. A low cost zero energy cool
chamber for short term storage of mango. Acta Horticulturae. 291,519-524.
- 1991. Multilocational studies to reduce post harvest losses
during harvesting, handling. packing and transportation of
mango in India. Acta Horticulturae, 291,499-524.
Waskar. D.P. and Roy, S.K. : 992. Post harvest ripening
changes in banana: a review. Agricultural Reviews, 13( I ),
36-42.
150
127.27
~ 100
S
~
50
Mango
Banana
Guava
Sapota
Lime
Annona
Conclusions
Cool chambers developed at the Indian Agricultural
Research Institute, New Delhi, based on the principle or
evaporative cooling, were ideal ror short-term storage or
fruits and vegetables. Moreover, the chambers arc easy
to build using locally available resources. Besides storing fruits and vegetables these chambers may also be
used for growing mushrooms, storing bio-rertilizers and
short- term storage of milk.
References
Anon. 1982. Agriculture Service Bulletin No. 43. Rome. Food
and Agricultural Organization.
395
quality of fruits after storage at low temperature. A randomised complete block design with harvest and storage temperature combinations forming the blocks
(Cochran and Cox 1957) was employed in data collection.
The changes in skin colour, fimmess, and develop ..
ment of disease were recorded. For skin colour, the
changes were recorded using a scoring system where I
= green, 2 = light green, 3 = yellowish green, 4 = more
yellow than green, 5 = more orange than yellow, and 6
= full orange.
Firmness of the fruit was determined by puncture test
using an Instron 1140 machine. The puncture test was
carried out using the 7 mm diameter Magness Taylor
probe which was driven into the horizontal surface of the
fruit until punctured. The machine was operated using a
cross-head speed of 50 mm/min and a chart speed of 500
mm/min.
Changes in disease development were also recorded,
using a scoring system where 0 = no disease, I = < 25%
of fruit affected, 2 = 25-50% of fruit affected, and 3 = >
50% of fruit affected.
The fruits were analysed for pH, percentage of total
soluble solids (TSS), total titratable acidity (TT A), and
total sugars (TS).
The pH was determined by blending whole fruit at
room temperature; readings were taken using an Orion
digital pH meter model SA520. TSS of the expressed
juice of the whole fruits was measured using an Atago
digital refractometer (0-32 Brix). TTA was determined
by titrating a known weight of blended fruit sample to
pH 8.1 with 0.1 N NaOH and the results expressed as
percentage of oxalic acid (Lam 1983). Total sugars were
analysed by the method of Lane and Eynon (AOAC
1975).
Analysis of variance and Duncan's Multiple Range
Test were performed on data (Gomez and Gomez 1984;
Steel and Torrie 1980). Correlation analyses were also
perfomled on the data to determine the relationship
between the varieties. The SAS procedures were utilised
for data analysis using a mainframe computer (SAS
Institute 1985).
Results
* Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute
396
Table 1.
-D.2834
0.0001 **
2280
0.000
1.000
2280
0.3402
0.0001
t560
0.2632
0.0001 **
1560
0.0491
0.4565
2.'2
Temp.
Colour
Diseases
Firmness
Maturity
Table 2.
Maturity
(weeks)
10
12
13
Storage
period
0.2939
0.0001 *'
1560
0.2011
O.OO(lI ,.
1560
tU2.17
tU)(X) I **
232
0.4959
0.3415
1560
0.0638
0.3415
224
-0.07')3
0.2:171
224
Temp.
Colour
Disea:-.es
Storage
period
(weeks)
0
2
4
6
II
0.000
1.000
2280
0.0479
0.0583*
1560
0.:1'1..1
O.OtX)IH
1560
(Uk3,
o.om 1
2:12
()
2
4
6
0
4
6
8
0
2
4
6
8
2.0a
2.0a
2.6b
2Xh
2.6b
3.0a
3.2a
l.la
.3.4a
3.4a
3.5a
3.5a
.1.3a
4.0b
4.lb
3.6a
3.8ab
3.6a
4.0b
to
15
21)
2.0a
2.la
2.7h
2.7h
4.0c
2.0a
4.Rb
4.8b
2.0"
4,(,b
1,(1"
3.0a
4.Sb
4.Sb
3.0a
5.0b
3.5a
3.5a
3.%
4.lb
3.5a
4.7h
3.5a
5.0b
3.6a
3.8a
4.9b
3.6
3.6
3.7b
4.0b
5Jk
397
Table 5.
Maturity
(weeks)
Temp.
Storage
period
(week,)
10
15
20
.'.51 a
4.2%
3.7k
5.51a
2.65b
2mb
5.51"
4.66a
2.24b
L05h
4.66a
1.98a
ITA
10
o
4
6
8
II
a
2
-1
6
X
12
()
4
6
8
()
2
4
5.51a
4,49b
4.IXb
:UOc
.i.~5(
4.(,6a
4.67a
4.00b
4.04b
3.36e
4.50a
4.48a
3.8411
3.63bc
3.1 He
4.51"
4.89a
4.21a
4.94a
5.27a
2.29h
TSS
:U6c
2.77d
4.66a
4.12b
~.)Rc
2.5()(J
2.200
UO"
J/)Sb
3.60b
2.8Oc
1.760
4.5la
4.28ab
.'.7%
pH
TS
4.50a
2.96b
4.50a
0.9%
0.000
1.000
,,20
0.000
1.000
320
0.000
1.000
\20
O.6()9.i
0.1161
0.0289
O.cX)O I)' 1).0777 0.6615
L12
232
232
0.4984
0.4443 0.0860
0.0001*' 0.0001** 0.1920
232
232
232
0.2039
0.3253
0.1296
0.fJOI8** 0.0001** 0.0487*
232
212
232
0.,693
0.2757-0.1928
O'c)()()IH 0.0001** 0.0032'
2"2
232
232
Maturity
4.51 a
2,40b
Table 6 .
_1.XXab
10
Temperature
Maturity
(weeks)
Storage
peflod
2
4
6
~
II
o
4
6
12
o
4
6
~
1.1
ee)
()
6
8
OSk
1.07d
OJJO"
O.cX)a
O.37b
O.8Ck
a.50b
O.OOa
D.OOa
0.17"
040b
O.50b
O.OOa
0.06a
O.OOa
OB!>
10
15
20
O.OOa
O.OOa
0.60b
1 13,'
2 ..nd
IJ.(IOa
Ii.O'"
l ..-:'(lb
1.97c
O.OOa
O,r,b
2.43c
O.OOa
0.70b
0.00"
l.77b
2.40c
I).OOa
O.OOa
0.17a
D.17a
(J-')Ob
O.OOa
l.b7b
IWOa
O.OOa
O.S"b
0.0:1"
O.()()a
Tern[X'ralUl'e ("C)
(weeks)
II
O.OOa
O.OOa
(nOb
pH
-l.05ah
pcriou
\.. \\'l:CK.:-,)
TSS
ITA
4.51a
1.63b
10
Maturity
(wecbl
Temp.
0.0462*
212
O.S093 OJ) 179
(UXX)I** 0.7861
2.,2
232
period
Table 4.
Stora~e
0.3563
0.0001**
232
0.1310
0.0017*
232
-0.2020
O.0020 H
212
o
4
6
8
12
o
4
6
I.),")b
()
2
4
6
O.OOa
O.90b
3.80a
4.20ac
4.68be
4.55bc
S.05h
4.05"
4,4Sb
4.65b
4.'iOb
4.53b
4.55ab
4.58ab
4.65"
4,40b
4,45ab
4.53a
4.40ab
4.3~ab
4,43"b
4.28b
10
15
20
3.80a
4.60b
4.'Sb
4,48b
4.53h
4.05a
4.40b
4.53b
4.40b
4.50b
4.55b
4.9 1a
4.70ah
4.o'1ab
4.65;,1)
4.Y1ah
4.50ab
4.53ab
4.73a
4,42b
3.80a
4.58b
4.h2b
3.SOa
4.6Hb
-l.1I5a
4.58b
4.37h
4.l15a
4.05"
4.55a
448a
4.55a
4.35a
4S'a
4.05a
4.5:'"
4.10a
CWO
398
Table 8,
Maturity
(weeks)
10
0
2
4
6
8
0
II
Table 7.
4
6
~
Maturity
(weeks)
10
a
2
4
6
II
o
2
4
6
12
()
(,
1.1
Temperature r'C)
Storage
period
(weeks)
o
2
4
6
8
10
O.lO"
0.17"
0.17"
0.18"
0.20a
0.16a
0.18a
0.17a
0.17a
0.15"
0.15a
0.16a
0.17a
0.15a
0.15,.
11.11"
11.15"
(l.IL!
11.1k,
1I.le"
(I.llla
1I.1~"h
11.1 ~"h
0.1 S"b
0.17b
0.16a
O.18a
0.17a
0.16"
0.16a
0.15"
O.ISa
0.15a
0.14"
0.13"
ILI'"h
0.14"h
0.15"
1).11 b
1I.12"h
15
O.lOa
O.IRa
0.15b
0.16a
0.18a
0.15a
12
20
0.20a
0.18a
1:1
7.8~a
7.45a
7.~Sa
7.4Sa
10.50a
930b
X.l):1h
X.5Xh
X.55b
I 1.01"
IO.50ah
0.15a
O.lla
Tahle 9.
1I.1.'a
0.13"
0.14,.
Maturity
(weeks)
'i.Xllh
8.J.l.c
7.511c
12,2~a
12.25.1
10.2Sh
9.2()h
1O.45h
9.5Sb
8.23c
7.40c
9.23b
9.3Sb
7.10"
7.98h
7.60a
7.IOa
7.78"
10.50a
10.00
9.50a
10.50"
7.68b
I 1.28a
9.00b
11.28"
8.88b
12.2Sa
9.S8b
12.25"
8.38b
Tempe-ruture (OC)
10
7.17"
6.86,.
h.1 ()a
(,
6 ..1l>a
6.2)'-1
7. _ "~a
o
2
4
6
o
2
7.17a
(d<6a
6.7 1)a
6 ..14h
7,.1 7 b
6.06b
7 ..18ab
7.90"
738ab
7.02ab
6.70b
7.6Sab
8.IOa
8.49a
7.08b
6.81h
9.22a
8.47b
7.90bc
7.41c
7.5%
b.~_~d
7.6-l"
7.67a
7.7Sa
6 . .1lb
7.65"
7.90"
7.69"
7.3.1"
7.I~a
1.1
20
8.R8h
8.68h
11'(l.1a
IO.I)"b
9.50lx:
8.8Se
4
6
!2
7.10"
7.15a
7.68a
7.55a
7.00a
10.50a
9.3Sb
9.2Xb
9.S.1hc
(wceh)
10
IS
~cpari.ltion
Mean~
0.15a
0.13a
O.I"2a
7.IOa
10
0.16"
0.18"
(,
4
6
8
Mean
level.
Temperature ('C)
Storage
period
(weeks)
9.22a
7.94b
7(Y)h
15
20
7.17a
5.92b
S.IOc
7.17a
5.2%
7.38a
7 ..1la
7.IOa
7.38a
6.32a
7.65a
7.97a
7.65"
6.60a
9.22a
4.21b
9.22a
4.4%
Discussion
:-.ignilicantly different.
Temperature (0C)
Days at
ambient
S
10
0
3
S
7
II
12
13
3
S
7
0
3
S
7
0
3
S
7
O.OOa
O.IOa
O,43b
0.66('
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
O.OOa
O.OOa
0.12al1
0.23b
O.Of>a
O.07a
0.63b
0.73b
10
O.OOa
O.OOa
OAOb
0.70c
O.G3
1.30b
2.03c
2.63d
0.17a
0.37a
0.373
0.9711
O.03a
O.04a
O.77b
O.96b
S
12
-'
13
S
7
0
-'
S
7
Conclusion
Temperature (OC)
Days at
ambient
0.17a
O.37ab
0.5311('
0.73c
O.OOa
O.40b
0.8Sc
I.IOd
10
0.17a
0.6-'b
1.01('
I.SOd
O.OOa
O.46b
1.0Oe
I.OOc
400
References
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) 1975.
Methods of analysis, 12th ed. Washington, D.C.
Campbell. C.W., Huber, OJ. and Koch, K. 1987. Postharvest
response of carambolas to storage at low temperatures. Proceedings Florida State Horticultural Sciences, 100. 272275.
Cochran. W.G. and Cox. G.M. 1957. Experimental designs.
2nd ed. New York. Wiley. 611 p.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomcz. A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for
agricultural research. 2nd l'd. New York. Wiley. 680 p.
Kenny. P. and Hull. L. 1986. Effects of storage condition on
carambola quality. Proceedings Florida State Horticultural
Science, 99, 222-24.
Lam. P.F. 1983. Postharvest stud It'S on carambola (Averrhoa
caramboia L.) fruits. Unpublished. MS thesis, Universiti
Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
401