Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMi films
the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and
dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of
computer printer.
IE
W
In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
EV
PR
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
W
IE
EV
PR
R eproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
T he H u m a n it a r ia n Ha n g o v e r :
T r a n s f o r m a t io n a n d T r a n s n a t io n a l iz a t io n o f
G o v e r n m e n t a l P r a c t ic e in R e f u g e e - A f f e c t e d T a n z a n i a
by
EV
IE
PR
GRADUATE DIVISION
o f the
Fall 2002
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
PR
EV
IE
U M I Num ber: 3 0 8 2 2 6 8
___
UMI
U M I Microform 3 0 8 2 2 6 8
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
PR
EV
IE
W
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
IE
W
EV
ZCCZ
Date
PR
Chair
Muf gg,
(J
->
3lJ Zaa:
D ate
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
Abstract
The Humanitarian Hangover:
Transformation and Transnationalization o f Governmental Practice in Refugee-Affected Tanzania
by
Loren Brett Landau
Doctor o f Philosophy in Political Science
University of California, Berkeley
IE
W
EV
PR
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L Landau
EV
IE
iNvO a.
Date
PR
Chair
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
Table of C ontents
Hi
rv
v/
Introduction
16
31
33
35
Two: T h e
P l a t o n i c S t a t e : G e n e s is , D e p a r t i c i p a t i o n , a n d D e s i c c a t i o n
Introduction
IE
W
C h a p te r
40
45
59
82
EV
97
C h a p t e r T h r e e : T h e H u m a n i t a r i a n i n f l u x a n d C h a l l e n g e s t o M a t e r ia l P r a c t ic e
Introduction
99
101
107
121
PR
147
C h a p t e r F o u r : P o l i c e , V io l e n c e , a n d D e f o r m a l iz in g C o e r c i v e p r a c t i c e
Introduction
Legalization and Deformalization Defined
Coercive Mechanisms and Challenges to Existing Practice
The Official Response: Failed Legalization
Towards Deformalization and Spatialization
149
151
157
171
189
C h a p t e r F i v e : R e i f i c a t i o n , t e r r it o r i a l i z a t i o n , a n d T r a n s n a t i o n a l i z a t i o n
Introduction
192
194
197
219
234
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
ii
C h a p t e r S ix : T e c h n o c r a t ic H u b r is a n d D iv e r t e d D e c e n t r a l iz a t io n :
R e f o r m C h a l l e n g e s in R e f u g e e - a f f e c t e d T a n z a n i a
Introduction
237
241
243
Conclusions
260
C h a pt e r S e v e n : T he H u m a n it a r ia n Ha n g o v e r
264
265
278
284
B ib l io g r a p h y a n d s o u r c e s
288
Archival Sources
308
Interviews
APPENDICES
IE
W
309
I.
315
316
IV.
V.
318
319
VI.
VII.
326
333
PR
EV
II.
III.
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
317
347
L. Landau
iii
Tables
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
4 .4
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
EW
2 .7
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
EV
I
2.5
2.6
PR
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
25
26
27
27
29
29
30
66
70
83
93
94
95
96
106
126
132
137
137
138
139
141
142
169
178
184
184
207
210
217
221
227
F ig u r e s
i.i
1.2
4.1
7.1
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
13
15
163
282
L. Landau
iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
While it is impossible to show adequate appreciation for all those who have contributed to
this projects completion, I wish to use this opportunity to recognize a few of those who showed me
favor o f their support, guidance, or friendship. In Berkeley my most obvious and greatest debts are
to my academic advisors and committee members, David K. Leonard, Chris K. Ansell, Robert M.
Price, and Donald Moore. Their accessibility in the face of heightening administrative and
academic burdens is particularly remarkable. I also owe considerable gratitude to Michael Watts,
Emst B. Haas, Ken Jowitt, Ted Miguel, and the staff of Berkeleys African Studies Center,
EW
particularly Martha Saavedra. Outside of Berkeley I wish to recognize Liisa Malkkis direct and
indirect influence on this project and George Von der Muhlls willingness to share the original data
from his 1966 survey, even though it initially arrived in punch card format. Beth Whitakers
generosity in allowing me to read her unfinished dissertation provided considerable insight and
EV
I
practical guidance for my own work. I have also benefited from my fellow graduate students, at
Berkeley and elsewhere. In this regard I would to thank, in no particular order, Daniel Kronenfeld,
Anna Schmidt, Victor Peskin, Zach Elkins, Sally Roever, Leila Harris, Alex Perullo, Shalini
PR
Satkunanandan, and John Sides. The members of my 'dissertation support group, Ken Foster,
Laura Henry, and Ben Goldfrank, consistently endured my impenetrable drafts and returned
invaluable comments. For teaching me the basics of SPSS, special appreciation goes to Kathryn
Pearson. I must also not overlook Christine Chussis friendship and support.
Given their distance and inaccessibility, I fear that I can not even begin to pay back the
extensive debts of hospitality and guidance I accrued while in the field. At the University of Dar es
Salaam, Dean Rekaza Mukandala, Ambrose Kessey, Opportuna Kweka, and the staff of the Center
for Forced Migration helped me navigate Tanzanias sometimes labyrinthine bureaucracy. In that
regard I wish to extend my gratitude to the Tanzanian Commission of Science and Technology for
eventually granting me a research visa and the family o f Hildebrand Shayo who proved gracious
hosts in Dar es Salaam during my seemingly interminable wait.
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
IE
W
I am particularly indebted to Polly Dollan o f CARE International (Kasulu), one o f the few
Americans I encountered in rural Tanzania and organizer of Tanzanias only Ultimate league, and
the staffs o f Africare (Kasulu) and Christian Outreach (Kasulu). For their hospitality and insight, 1
EV
wish to acknowledge Joseph Ketto, the staff of the Red Cross at Ngaraganza. Rukiat Omary of the
International Committee o f the Red Cross provided both friendship and access to a photocopier, two
invaluable and scarce resources in Western Tanzania. The British VSOs in Kasulu also deserve
PR
recognition for their friendship and sometimes terrifying lifts on the back of their motorcycle. In
Geneva, I wish to thank Mariko Tomiyama for her hospitality and Jeff Crisp for a look behind the
UNHCRs polished external image.
This project would not have been possible without the generous financial support I
received. The Federal Language and Area Studies (FLAS) scholarship program funded my first
three years at Berkeley, the Fulbright Foundations Group Project Abroad allowed me to improve,
but by no means perfect, by Swahili during a summer's language training in Tanzania. The
MacArthur and Rocca Foundations supported my extended research expedition.
Lastly I wish to thank my parents, Rebecca and Rubin Landau. Without their support, this
project would have never been started.
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
T he H um anitarian H a n g o v e r
L. Landau
ACRONYM S
A CORD
AHRBG
ASP
A fro -S h ira z
CCM
CNDD
CUF
P arty
CUT
CORD
D A N ID A
DC
DW T
EAC
ECHO
FAO
IE
W
DED
D F ID
F r o li n a
G oT
Government of Tanzania
IC R C
IF A D
K aD E P
MHA
EV
IF R C
IR C
NARLEP
NCCR- M
N ER P
NGO
NORAD
PR
MSF
P a lip e h u tu
PRA
RAS
RC
Regional Commissioner
RPF
SAP
SNV
SPRAA
TAA
TANU
TCRS
TPDF
TTCL
TRCS
USAID
UNDP
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
U N IC E F
UNHCR
W FP
PR
EV
IE
W
UW T
VDC
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
C h a p t e r O n e : N o r m a t i v e , a c a d e m i c , a n d M e t h o d o l o g i c a l f o u n d a t io n s
Introduction
This project is about the politics of rural Tanzania; it is an account of transitions, crises,
and transformations; what came before and what may come after. Through a comparison of two
similar sitesone of which has been directly influenced by the sudden influx of tens o f thousands
of refugees and millions of aid dollarsI provide an example of how forced migration may lead
one countrys complex political crises to induce the reconsideration and renegotiation of
governmental practices in another. This is a timely project that systematically explores a topic of
increasing importance throughout the world. In tracing the consequences of refugees and
humanitarian assistance on the lives and livelihoods of rural Tanzanians, I enhance our
EV
IE
understanding o f forced migration and analytically integrate the refugee experience with broader
social scientific debates. It provides both an empirical contribution and helps eschew mechanistic
and teleological models of rural political-economic transition and development by highlighting
the centrality o f historical contingency and local particularities in shaping the disciplines,
PR
practices, and logics that buttress contemporary political configurations and state forms in Africa
and elsewhere.
The unanticipated arrival of hundreds of thousands of refugees and millions o f aid dollars
into a remote and poor district uniquely, if unfortunately, exposes states foundational
configurations. As this influx abruptly increases demands on communities material, social, and
administrative resources it may induce a crisis that opens novel and unexpected avenues for
renegotiating and transforming the ties between and among domestic and international actors.1
Such population, organization, and financial inflows also enable, if not necessitate, the
1 Maier writes that, crisis is a strong and often overused term. Still, it is justified for it sign ifies a
precarious system ic state in which an organism or society hovers between decom position and a rallying o f
collective energy. Undergoing a crisis does not preclude a recovery o f vitality, but it does suggest that the
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
insinuation o f new national and supra-national actors into what were predominantly localized
governmental logics. As these reconfigured relationships crystallize, we may discover that the
character o f ties among permanent residents and their governing institutions has been
fundamentally altered. Through diachronic and geographic comparison, this study identifies,
documents, and explains how one humanitarian influxthe arrival of central African refugees,
millions o f aid dollars into Tanzanias Kasulu districthas interacted with existing patterns,
expectations, and strategies, to create a spatialized regime o f governmental practice.
This anomalous regime, the humanitarian hangover, possesses a set o f surprising, sometimes
IE
W
paradoxical, and theoretically noteworthy traits. For example, despite the presence of tens of
thousands of internationals (refugees, aid workers) and the economic and environmental pressures
associated with rapid population increase, the influx has not induced a substantial shift in
productive patterns or accelerated locals integration into a national or global capitalist economy.
EV
Indeed, with few exceptions, those in the affected areas continue the same kind o f small-scale
agriculture and petty trading that engaged them before the influx. Increasing rates o f crime have,
PR
however, catalyzed substantial shifts in practices, although not those that one might expect.
There has not been a fundamental breakdown in the socio-political orderalthough residents fear
mounting violence nor have the Tanzanian police stepped in to protect citizens property, lives,
and livelihoods. Instead, citizens have either resigned themselves to greater danger or are
organizing themselves individually or in groupsto address perceived injustices. This
disengagement from and contravention o f supra-local legal standards denudes the state, obviating
one o f its most primitive functions: the provision of order and security. Moreover, the presence
and actions of resource-rich international aid and development agencies has transnationalized
many o f the social service functions typically expected to fall within the states bailiwick. These
society and states that em erge after an extended period o f turbulence shall have been transformed, not
m erely restored (1994:51).
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
conditions make it all the more remarkable that the affected population is strengthening its
identitive links to the Tanzanian nation, its political leaders, and the physical territory they
inhabit. Against most theoretically informed expectations, those people living in the countrys
refugee-affected areas consider themselves more Tanzanian than ever before.
IE
W
most enduring concerns: the state and its interconstitutive relationship with domestic and
international political communities and citizens. At one level the links between these two realms
o f inquiry are entirely too obvious: failing states provide incentives for violence which produces
massive human displacement (see Keen 1998; Gurr 1991). Investigating this connection,
EV
however, leads to an exploration o f violence and warfare rather than o f the state per se. Instead,
focusing on forced displacements transformatory effects on existing governmental practices in
host countries broadens our understanding of the refugee-experience while allowing instances
PR
o f migration and humanitarianism to serve as departure points for interrogating social scientific
theories of contemporary states and state-formation.
Launching this investigating in Africa has the added benefit of challenging the analytic
barriers between African Area studies and the methods and substance of more mainstream
social/political science. With few exceptions, the predominant problematics, language, and
methods o f contemporary social science Political Science in particularderive from and are
designed for exploring European and American events and phenomena.2 The almost total
absence o f formal quantitative data (e.g., public opinion polls, economic surveys) not to
- Bayart (1993:5) speaks sp ecifically to this challenge in suggesting that the typical classificatory schem es
and m ethodologies em ployed within political scien ce have been drawn up, refined, and discussed on the
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
mention the technical and personal challenges for Euro-American researchershave served to
exclude Africa, Africanists, and Africans, from broader debates, especially as American
Political Science increasingly fetishizes large n, quantitative studies. Topics and geographic
areas that were once central to the discipline have consequently fallen out of favor (see below). It
is hoped that this projects conceptual rigor and ecumenical research design might go some way
to bridge this gulf. To augment our understanding o f a set of empirical events while
demonstrating the general value of comparative and theoretically informed studies undertaken in
IE
Migration, forced and otherwise, has in the past been and important subject of social
scientific inquiry (see Petersen 1958; Mayer 1961; Pauw 1962; Hartz 1964; Hansen and Oliver-
EV
Smith 1982; Cornelius 1988), but has since fallen into the realm o f Development or Refugee
Studies. For many years, international humanitarian action was similarly marginalized,
receiving attention only from practitioners or social scientists explicitly concerned with global
PR
governance and cooperation. Until recently, few explored the relationships between this
cooperation and the welfare or livelihoods o f those most directly affected by it. The end o f the
cold war and the proliferation o f complex humanitarian emergencies have marked a significant
renaissance o f academic interest in these phenomena. A brief statistical overview does much to
explain this. In 1980 there were 5.7 million officially recognized refugees worldwide. By 1995
that number had grown to 14.4 million. By January 2000, during this projects research, it
reached 22.3 million (http://www.unhcr.ch). No region o f the world has been more affected by
these movements than sub-Saharan Africa which boasted 6.3 o f these refugees. Tanzania alone,
the worlds fourth poorest country, hosted over half a million o f the continents official refugees
basis o f historical experiences that exclude Africa. See also M oore (1986:329), Ranger (1996:272), and
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
in 2000, and probably half that number again in unregistered exiles. With an estimated
population of 36,232,074, it is easy to understand why these migrants have received so much
popular, academic, and political attention.3
The lack o f an expansive conceptual and methodological core has meant that studies of
forced migration have, however, either taken the form of single case studies or focused on a
narrowly defined set of issues. Many are quite naturally concerned with the refiigee-experience
per se, often attempting to document the cause o f displacement (natural disaster, war, etc.) and its
effects on the refugees themselves. These outcomes are measured in any number of ways, from
IE
W
the purely economic to the psychological or social (see Colson 1971; Harrel-Bond 1986). Others
examine the international relief apparatus organizational pathologies. The focus here is often
on technical or legal solutions to problems of service delivery, repatriation, and reintegration with
their concomitant effects on relief (Waters 2001; Goodwin-Gill 1983; Zolberg, et al. 1989). Still
EV
others take a more systemic approach, pointing to the roots o f the current humanitarian regime
and all of the contradictions, paradoxes, and failings therein. These include explorations of the
PR
definition o f refugees, the legal and political conditions under which international humanitarian
action is allowed, and their subsequent legal and political implications (Tuitt 1996; Zetter 1991).
A last group nested in post-modernist anthropology and critical theorytypically
approach humanitarian action as yet another form o f global regulation and normalization.
Drawing on the organizational pathologies others identify, they point to the precedence afforded
order and bureaucratic procedures (particular within refugee camps) over the welfare, livelihoods,
and freedom or sovereignty of the refugees themselves (see Hyndman 2000,1996, Malkki 1992,
1995b). All of these strains continue today as more or less fruitful debates or discussions in
various sub-fields related to forced migration and humanitarianism.
Chabal (1996:29).
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
There is little need to critically review these texts here, only to draw attention to the
refugee-centrism linking them all. Malkki speaks to this in suggesting that, for anthropologists at
least, the term refugees denotes an objectively self-delimiting field of study with its own biases
and language, and one that is limited largely to matters concerning the refugees themselves
(1995a:496). An emerging body of literature, however, is turning these inquiries logic on its
head. As refugees and humanitarian assistance are assigned analytical agency, they cease being
merely the outcomes of broader processes, but become actors in their own right effecting
substantial economic and political changes in countries of origin and first asylum (see Hollands
2001; Schmidt 1998; Black 1994). Inspired in large part by Chambers (1993) pithily titled,
Hidden Losers: The Impact of Rural Refugees and Refugee Programs on Poorer Hosts, an
IE
important subset o f this work explores refugee-affected areas geographical and social sites in
which refugee and relief mechanisms interact with existing social and physical environments.
EV
While enhancing our comprehension of forced migration, these inquiries have, to borrow
Hakovirtas comment on Refugee Studies generally, tended to be short on precise concepts,
PR
theoiy-building, and theory-based empirical research (1993: 36). The result is a series of case
studies and a concentration on refugees short-term material or psychological impacts (see
Damme etal. 1998; Jacobsen 1997; 1996; Black 1994; Bascom 1993; Kuhlman 1991; Kok 1989;
Hansen and Oliver-Smith 1982). Recent work, notably by Whitaker (1999) and Waters (1999),
demonstrates the need to explore the often more subtle and longer-term influences refugees and
relief have on host communities social and political configurations. Neither author, however,
provides a systematic or comparative framework for evaluating such influences.
2002 .
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f th e copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
L. Landau
IE
W
develops and operationalizes an analytical schema for assessing and comparing the long-term
effects o f a humanitarian influxthe sudden arrival o f refugees and reliefon host communities
regimes o f governmental practice. This analytic not only helps make sense o f the influxs
complex and far-reaching effects, but allows such findings to speak to broader social scientific
EV
themes and problematics. Indeed, by demonstrating that a humanitarian influx has induced a
spatialized and transnationalized variance in Tanzanias national regime o f practice, this project
PR
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
should not be seen simply as a set of formal organizations existing to instrumentally meet the
needs o f society at large or a hegemonic group within or without a given political community (see
Jessop 1990:5; Stepan 1978).5 Although the Tanzanian political elite have long claimed to
represent the peoples interests, for example, they have frequently acted in ways that contravenes
the general will and have actively suppressed the institutional and organizational mechanisms
through which social actors could make their will publicly known (see Chapter Two). Similarly,
there is little to justify claims that Tanzanias central administration exists merely as a tool of an
international class or power.
This work takes seriously the neo-statists claim that the state, or elements thereof, should
be granted some analytical autonomy from society, however defined. Such distinction recognizes
EV
IE
that in addition to responding to popular pressures, political leadership can help to define a
population and shape its demands. The state may similarly mediate or exploitrather than be
merely subject to international influences and actors (see Evans 1995; Johnson 1982; Levy
1999). I do not, however, accept the notion that the state should, a priori, be viewed as a unitary,
PR
goal-oriented actor. Such a perspective may be accurate on the international stage (e.g.,
Tanzanian Ministry of Home Affairs negotiating with international donors) or in certain sociohistorical contexts, but it is by no means universal. Even the most rationalized political
systemto borrow a dated term (Easton 1965) is wrought by cracks and internal conflicts
within even that realm which might sensibly be considered the state. This is especially so given
Tanzanias under-resourced and weakly managed public administration where ministries and
4 For a more com plete resume o f these debates, see Joel M igdal (1997; 1994; 1988), Evans, e t al. (1985)
and Evans (1995). A s a testament to the acrimony and hostility associated w ith the campaign to Bring the
State Back In, see A lm ond (1990); Friedland and Alford (1991); M itchell (1991).
D Although not necessarily concerned with the state, both Marxist and Pluralist thinkers have been
regularly faulted for adopting this rationalistic and instrumental perspective. In the m ost vulgar terms,
Marxist thinkers have often view ed the State as either the executive com m ittee o f the bourgeois (Marx
1950) or, for those w ho grant it som e autonomy, as the agent o f global capitalism (W allerstein 1974).
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.
L. Landau
agencies often work at cross-purposes, unaware of each others mandates and actions. The
presence of internal divides within and among state agencies, therefore, speaks to the need to
understand how various elements of the state and society interact and how the boundaries
between official and social organizations, be they real or perceived, are established. While
locals (e.g., citizens, residents) may see the state as a unified, purposive whole existing in a
realm distinct from society, more careful analysis often reveals that the state manifests itself
differently in across time and space (see Mitchell 1991).
Accepting that state varies across time and space draws attention to historical
contingencys role and the importance of considering a given states cultural, institutional,
historical, and geographic miluex (Jessop 1990:267-269; see also Ertman 1996; Tilly 1975). One
IE
must allow for the possibility that markedly different social contextseven within the same
countrywill produce effectively different manifestations o f the state at the local level. With
EV
this I move away from the neo-Statists and towards a perspective influenced by the French
Marxian scholar Nicos Poulantzas (1969,1979[1974]). Instead of viewing the state as simply a
PR
tool of the bourgeoisie (domestic or international), Poulantzas argues that state power emerges
from social relations, produced and reproduced through the interactions o f bureaucratic state
institutions and class forces. While this perspective is still too aggregative failing, for example,
to problematize class as the most salient mobilizational and analytical strategy and focusing
unduly on state efforts to control society it opens important avenues for further inquiry.
Michel Foucault, himself trained in French Marxist thought, gets us very close to the
analytical lens needed to make sense o f the humanitarian influxs socio-political consequences.
His work on governmental science and governmentality elaborates and qualifies Poulantzas
ideas by conceptualizing the state as a set of organizations emerging from and constantly
Pluralists have been criticized for seeing the state as som ething o f a cash register totaling up societal
preferences and executing policy for the good o f all (Krasner 1989).
R ep ro d u ced with p erm ission o f the copyright ow ner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout p erm ission.