Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steel Sections
in Power Plant Construction
(IFLHQWVROXWLRQV
for power plants
with hot rolled sections
Contents
1.
2.
4.
Power plants
Structural steels from ArcelorMittal
5ROOHGVHFWLRQVDQGWKHLUEHQHWV
Advantage of HISTAR steels compared to conventional
structural steels
5. Optimised construction elements for power plant construction
6. Foundations for high loads
7. Sustainable construction with hot rolled steel sections
Annex A1
Comparison of S235 rolled sections with HISTAR 460
AnnexA2
Comparison of rolled sections with ACB beams
Annex 3
Comparison of box section with cross-shaped section
7HFKQLFDODGYLFHDQGEHDPQLVKLQJ
5
8
13
21
24
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
Figure 2: Boiler frame structure of a coal power plant with bottom part of boiler house
1. Power plants
Introduction
Caption
1) Unit transformers
2) Switchgear building
3) Power house
4) Steam generator enclosure
5) Electrostatic precipitator
6) Flue gas cooler
Figure 8: Rolling of a HISTAR-grade beam on the Grey rolling mill of ArcelorMittal in Differdange,
Luxembourg
Standard
(N 00 00
(N 0 00
Minimum elongation A
L0
S0
%
Tensile strength Rm
MPa
!
0
0
0
0
0
)
!
0
0 0
)
0
Standard
(N 00 00
(N 0 00
Nominal thickness
50C
00C
50C
00C
50C
00C
50C
00C
50C
500C
mm
50
5
5
mm t 0 mm
5
5
0
0
5
5
)
)
Standard
C
%
Si
max.
%
Mn
%
P
max.
%
S
max.
%
Al total
min.
%
N
max.
%
Cr
max.
%
Cu
max.
%
Mo
%
Ni
max.
%
(N 00 00
(N 0 00
0 00
0
00 00
00
000
)
00
00
00
0 0
00
11
Figure 11:Minimum yield strength of HISTAR steels and EN10025-4 steels according to the material thickness
13
Weight
relative to grade S 355
Material costs
Weld volume
100 %
160 %
156 %
171 %
174 %
175 %
100 %
78 %
73 %
53%
70 %
68 %
Relative
weight
Relative
material costs
S 235 JR
HD 400 x 1086
27027
S 355 JR
HD 400 x 634
26260
HISTAR 460
HD 400 x 463
27117
Steel grade
Section
Ultimate load (kN)
S 235 JR
HD 400 x 1086
25254
S 355 JR
HD 400 x 677
24580
HISTAR 460
HD 400 x 463
25156
Fabrication
costs
Weight
per meter
130
90
115 125
35
Steel grade
Section
Ultimate load (kN)
120 %
102 %
100 %
82 %
62 %
Steel grade
Section
Ultimate load (kN)
Weight (kg/m)
Figure 16: Optimised truss joint with sections from one series
S 355
Box column
47463
1342
S 355 JR
HD 400 x 990
+ plates
46568
1320
HISTAR 460
HD 400 x 1086
50544
1086
15
17
CEV [%]
Thickness [mm]
140
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
Preheating
temperature [C]
80
es
ad
r
g
el
te
s
al
ion
t
n
ve nve
o
C
40
12
140
12
TAR
HIS
0,3
0,2
235 275
355
420
460
500
19
6HFWLRQVEDVHGRQ+/DQGODUJH+(SUROHUDQJH
6HFWLRQVEDVHGRQ+'DQGPHGLXP+(SUROHUDQJH
Figure 21: Optimised beam cross sections on the basis of rolled beams
21
Cellular beams
with hexagonal openings
Cellular beams
with octagonal openings
23
Figure 27: Use of HEB 800 with lengths ranging between 33.80 and 38.80 m as driven piles for water
intake at the power plant Wilhelmshaven. During the construction phase they serve as tension piles to
prevent lift, in their final function they transfer loads.
Figure 28: Driven piles with reinforcement at the base to increase the cone friction resistance and
thus provide support for high loads
25
. in economical aspects
. in socio-cultural aspects
. in technical aspects
. in process aspects
Annex A1
Comparison of rolled section S235 with HISTAR 460
buckling curve
Cross Section
Limits
z
b
S 235
S 275
S 355 S 460
S 420
tf 40 mm
yy
zz
a
b
a0
a0
40 mm < tf 100
yy
zz
b
c
a
a
tf 100 mm
yy
zz
b
c
a
a
tf > 100 mm
yy
zz
d
d
c
c
y
h/b 1,2
Rolled sections
tf
Buckling
about
axis
Nb,R d
6.600
0,99 d 1 Verified!
6.671
F A fy
J M1
Nb,R d
Ncrr
325,8 22,5
2 ,5
0,440
37950
Ncrr
2
) 0,51 D O 0,2 O 0,637
NEd = 6.600 kN
System length = buckling length
L = 325 cm
Buckling resistance verification according to EN
1993-1-1: 2005 (D)
NE d
Nb,R d
d 1,0
) )2 O
F 0,91
) )2 O
but F d 1
F 0,91
Nb,R d
6.600
0,99
0,9 d 1 Verified!
6.655
2
) 0,51 D O 0,2 O 0,748
D = 13
This results in the stress reduction factor
It follows :
=1
0,660
It follows :
A fy
159 46 ,0
16804
A fy
but F d 1
27
Annex A2
Comparison of rolled section with ACB beam
Single beam subject to uniformly distributed load
Span : 16,00 m
Assumption: Beam laterally restrained
16 m
Load combination
1,35 r LF1 + 0,7 r 1,5 r LF2 + 1,5 r LF3
= 9,25 kN/m
= 296,0 kNm
Mmax
Load combination
1,35 r LF1 + 0,7 r 1,5 r LF2 + 1,5 r LF3
= 8,65 kN/m
= 276,8 kN/m
Mmax
SLS verification:
Maximum deflection at midspan : l/250
56,0 mm 64 mm
Verified
Verified
Verified
SLS verification:
Maximum deflection at midspan : l/250
60,7 mm 64 mm
Verified
Annex A3
Comparison of box section with cross-shaped section
Box section:
Designed as a welded box section made of S460 sheet plates with a
thickness of 25 mm.
A = 480 cm2
Iy = 187,703 cm4
Iz = 181,938 cm4
The slightly lower moment of inertia of area is decisive.
Lcr= 1,0.1000 = 1000 cm
Buckling curve c
=1
Nc r
The given system has the following length:
Buckling length
Lcr = 1000 cm
The cross sections have been chosen to ensure that the outer
dimensions are comparable and that the weight per meter is roughly
the same.
S2 EI
EI S2 21000 181938
L2c r
10002
A fy
480 4 4
0,748
37.709
Nc r
37709 k N
2
) 0,5 1 D O 0,2 O 0,5 1 0,4 9 0,748 0,2 0,7482 0,914
510
) )2 O
500
0,695
fy
JM1
0,695 480
44
4
1,0
14669 k N
460
510
500
29
Cross-shaped section:
The cross-shaped beam consists of two HEB 500 sections made of
HISTAR 460. This eliminates the disadvantage of the distinct weak axis.
It follows: : Iy,cross = Iz,cross = Iy,HEB500 + Iz,HEB500
This also applies to other axes at any angle to the y and z axis.
However, in the case of cross-shaped sections it must be ensured that
the torsional buckling load Ncr, is also determined and compared with
the flexural buckling load Ncr.
A = 478 cm2
Icross= 119,820 cm2
Despite being welded, the same buckling curves apply to the crossshaped sections as to the used rolled sections for buckling around their
strong axis.
1
2
) ) O
fy
J M1
0,745 478
S2 EI S2 21000 119.820
L2c r
10002
24.834 k N
N c r,-
1 S2
EI
2 Z 2
ip
L
cr
S2
1
GI
8100 2 538 23.187 k N
21000 2 7,018 106
T
2
2
1000
22,4
Buckling is decisive :
A fy
478 46
0,974
23.187
N cr
2
) 0,5 1 D O 0,2 O 0,5 1 0,13 0,974 0,2 0,9742 1,024
46
16 .378 k N
1, 0
N cr
0,745
Technical Advisory
& Finishing
Technical Advisory
Finishing
drilling
flame cutting
T cut-outs
notchingl
cambering
curving
straightening
cold sawing to exact length
welding and fitting of studs
shot and sand blasting
surface treatment
cs.eurostructures@arcelormittal.com
VHFWLRQV.arcelormittal.com
Autors :
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jrg Lange, Dipl.-Ing. Tobias Abel, ArcelorMittal Europe - Long Products
Copyrights :
Figure 1: Kraftwerk Walsum, K.-H. Isselmann, Donges SteelTec / Figure 3: Overview of coal power plant in Neurath, RWE / Figure 4: Working platform, Jrg Lange / Figure 5: Steel structure
of a refuse-derived fuel power plant, KeppelSeghers / Figure 6: SIEMENS Combined Cycle Power Plant steel structure of the power house Combined Cycle Power Plant, SIEMENS / Figure
30: Table from EN 1993-1-1: 2005, CEN
Although this brochure has been prepared with the utmost care, we would like to point out that we assume no liability regarding possible incorrect information or damage caused by
misinterpretation of the content.
Version 2014-1
ArcelorMittal
Commercial Sections