Professional Documents
Culture Documents
energy efficiency
Sinia Krajnovi
Applied Mechanics, Vehicle Aerodynamics Laboratory, Chalmers
Passenger vehicles
Trains
Commercial vehicles
Aerodynamic drag
Skin friction drag
Flow
High pressure
Low pressure
1
D = C D A U 2
2
Drag coefficient
Depends on shape
Area of cross-section
Dynamic
pressure
Mccallan, 2002
C D S 3U
FuelConsumption
=
+
+
FuelConsumption
S
U
CD
Reduce speed (factor of 3)
Change in shape
Flow Control
Platooning
The potential to reduce the drag of regional trains is around 2025%. This drag would lead to energy reductions of 6-8%.
Originally, the styling modell with the back angle of 45 degrees. The drag
coefficient was 0.40.
Reduction of slant angle to 30 deg. lead to a sudden 10 % increase in drag.
Optimization
ORIGINAL DESIGN
Mesh Deformation
GEOMETRY
MODIFICATION
Original
Optimized
CFD Simulation
Position
of
separati
on
Passive flow control devices are simple to use but cannot addapt to flow condition.
Natural flow
Controled flow
Natural flow
Suction
(a)
Experimental results
show drag reduction
up to 35%. (Modi
1992)
(b)
(a)
(b)
The time-averaged streamlines for non-rotating case (a) and rotating case (b) in the case
of 300 yaw angle, top view in the middle plane of the cube.
The experiment
The explanation
Natural flow
Controled flow
Regional trains
5/17/2013
Freight trains
Experimental results
show drag reduction
up to 35%. (Modi
1992)