You are on page 1of 5

PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN

ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT


_________________________________________________________________________
OUMM3203
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
MAY 2013
_________________________________________________________________________
ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR / INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS
1. Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam
bahasa modul bercetak kursus ini. / This assignment contains only ONE (1)
question that is set in the language of the printed module for the course.
2. Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris. / Answer in Malay or
English.
3. Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada
MyVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda
hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan
langkau baris 1.5. / Download the language version of the assignment
template concerned from the MyVLE for preparation and submission of
your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times
New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing.
4. Tugasan anda hendaklah antara 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak
termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung
tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan
anda. / Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding
references. The number of words should be shown at the end of your
assignment. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your
answer.
5. Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan SECARA ON-LINE melalui MyVLE. Sila
rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur menghantar tugasan
anda secara on-line. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan senaskah tugasan yang
diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. / You must submit your assignment ONLINE via the MyVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures to
submit your assignment on-line. You are advised to keep a copy of your
submitted assignment for personal reference.
6. Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail. /
You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file.
7. Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 9hb Julai 2013 hingga 17hb
Julai 2013. Serahan selepas 17hb Julai 2013 TIDAK akan diterima. / Your
assignment must be submitted between 9th July 2013 until 17th July
2013. Submission after 17th July 2013 will NOT be accepted.
8. Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan
orang
lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain
sebagai kerja sendiri. /

Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another
persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as
your own.

PENILAIAN / EVALUATION
Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus
berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This
assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be
assessed based on the Rubrics attached .
Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan
Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment
before the Final Semester Examination commences.
PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION
Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk
menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong
seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo
a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows:

Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 - 30%: potongan 20%


daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh.
Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 - 50%: potongan 40%
daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh.
Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar
akan diberikan.
Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the
total marks scored.
Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the
total marks scored.
Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would
be given.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

PURPOSE
The assignment is aimed at providing learners with the opportunity to use
analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision on an ethical
problem.
REQUIREMENT
Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of many
cultures. For example, the American Vice President, Spiro Agnew, resigned from
office after it was discovered that he took bribes while serving as Governor of
Maryland. In sports, Pakistani cricketers were found guilty of accepting bribes in

certain matches against England. Bribery can be in many forms, such as gifts,
kickbacks, donations, contributions, share options or career promotions.
Define the act of bribery. Using the economic, legal and ethical
approaches, analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate
its position from the moral point of view.
_________________________________________________________________________
MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE

ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

OUMM2103/ ENTREPRENUERSHIP /MAY 2013

Criteria

Introduction
Definition, history and
practice of bribery

Weig
ht

Economic analysis on
the act of bribery

2.5

Ethical analysis on the


act of bribery
2.5

Fair

Above average

Excellent

The write-up was


detailed and clear
with adequate
references from
reputable
sources.
Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces and
were very clear
and detailed.
Some cost/benefit
data illustrations
were given.
Arguments based
on the legal
framework and
social forces were
clear and
detailed.
Arguments based
on FOUR ethical
theories were
soundly
presented.

A write-up on
bribery was
not provided.

The write-up was


brief, unclear and
lacks depth.

The write-up was


brief and clear but
without reference
to any reputable
source.

The write-up was


adequate and clear,
but without any
reference to
reputable sources.

No economic
analysis was
carried out.

Arguments were
not based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces.

Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces but
incomplete and/or
irrelevant.

Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and market
forces and were
adequate and clear.

No legal
analysis was
carried out.

Arguments were
not based on the
legal framework
and social forces.

No ethical
analysis was
carried out.

Arguments based
on ONE ethical
theory were
soundly presented.

Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces but
incomplete/
irrelevant.
Arguments based
on TWO ethical
theories were
soundly presented.

Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces and
were adequate and
clear.
Arguments based on
THREE ethical
theories were
soundly presented.

2.5

Legal analysis on the


act of bribery

Low

Max
Mark
s

10

10

10

Conclusion
1.5

Total points

10

No
conclusion
was provided
on the
outcome of
the analysis.

The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
vague and/or
irrelevant.

The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
partially complete.

The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
adequate.

The conclusion on
the outcome of
the analysis was
detailed and
complete.

40

You might also like