Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another
persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as
your own.
PENILAIAN / EVALUATION
Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus
berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This
assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be
assessed based on the Rubrics attached .
Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan
Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment
before the Final Semester Examination commences.
PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION
Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk
menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong
seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo
a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows:
PURPOSE
The assignment is aimed at providing learners with the opportunity to use
analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision on an ethical
problem.
REQUIREMENT
Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of many
cultures. For example, the American Vice President, Spiro Agnew, resigned from
office after it was discovered that he took bribes while serving as Governor of
Maryland. In sports, Pakistani cricketers were found guilty of accepting bribes in
certain matches against England. Bribery can be in many forms, such as gifts,
kickbacks, donations, contributions, share options or career promotions.
Define the act of bribery. Using the economic, legal and ethical
approaches, analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate
its position from the moral point of view.
_________________________________________________________________________
MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE
ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
Criteria
Introduction
Definition, history and
practice of bribery
Weig
ht
Economic analysis on
the act of bribery
2.5
Fair
Above average
Excellent
A write-up on
bribery was
not provided.
No economic
analysis was
carried out.
Arguments were
not based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces.
Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces but
incomplete and/or
irrelevant.
Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and market
forces and were
adequate and clear.
No legal
analysis was
carried out.
Arguments were
not based on the
legal framework
and social forces.
No ethical
analysis was
carried out.
Arguments based
on ONE ethical
theory were
soundly presented.
Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces but
incomplete/
irrelevant.
Arguments based
on TWO ethical
theories were
soundly presented.
Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces and
were adequate and
clear.
Arguments based on
THREE ethical
theories were
soundly presented.
2.5
Low
Max
Mark
s
10
10
10
Conclusion
1.5
Total points
10
No
conclusion
was provided
on the
outcome of
the analysis.
The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
vague and/or
irrelevant.
The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
partially complete.
The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
adequate.
The conclusion on
the outcome of
the analysis was
detailed and
complete.
40