Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hayden
The
late
John
Rawls
was
a
giant
of
political
philosophy; Abdelkader Aoudjit peruses Patrick Haydens
study of his ideas.
Two major questions of ethics in international relations are the
question of who the subject of morality is individuals, groups
or states and the question of what duties such subjects have
beyond borders. Accordingly, writers on the ethics of
international relations tend to fall into three categories. At one
extreme are therealists who, while not completely rejecting
morality, believe that states are the dominant actors in world
affairs and that the only appropriate behaviour in international
affairs is the pursuit of national interest and the balance of
power. In this view, ones responsibility to fellow citizens far
outweighs the obligation to human beings in general. At the
other extreme are the cosmopolitans, who assert that
individuals, not states, are the ultimate subjects of morality
and that values and responsibilities transcend borders.
Cosmopolitans also believe that moral principles are
authoritative; where demands of morality conflict with those
of sovereignty, the former take precedence over the latter. In
between
the
realists
and
the cosmopolitans are
the internationalists for whom states have a privileged moral
status but who claim that states are bound by the principle of
respect for the sovereignty of other states.
John Rawls: Towards a Just World Order is an exposition and
critique from a cosmopolitan point of view of John Rawls
theory of international justice and human rights, which Patrick
Hayden interprets as a form of realism. More precisely,
Hayden claims that in order to accommodate cultural
pluralism and ensure international stability, Rawls betrayed