Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline of contents
Overview: Introduction
Single Degree of Freedom System
DAF for Fixed Platforms: Examples
Floating Structure Dynamics
Dynamic Analysis
Overview: Introduction
As the offshore platforms are always
subjected to the dynamic wave loads,
it is essential that the engineers
responsible
for
the
design,
construction and maintenance of these
platforms, have a fairly good idea of
the dynamic behavior of these
structures.
This presentation will supplement
your knowledge and explain some
basic ideas regarding the types of
dynamic analysis used for fixed and
floating types of platforms.
Dynamic Analysis
Course goals
The participants shall be able to
Formulate the basic equation for SDOF system
Draw and interpret the frequency Vs DAF graph
Differentiate between frequency & time domain dynamic
analysis
Differentiate between coupled and uncoupled dynamic
analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Lesson 1
Single Degree of Freedom
System
H
15m
22.5m
15m
F
15m
A
Dynamic Analysis
F = F0 sin t
where is the frequency of the
wave, t is the time & F0 is the
amplitude of the idealized wave
force, chosen so as to give the
same static deck deflection as that
found from the actual distributed
wave force acting on the structure.
Dynamic Analysis
the
be
its
the
Dynamic Analysis
M x
C x
Dynamic Analysis
F F M x C x
T
FT = K x
where K denotes the stiffness of the
structure.
Dynamic Analysis
we get
0
M x C x Kx F sin t
Dynamic Analysis
OFFSHOREENGINERING:ADVANCESANDSUSTAINABILITY
tan
x = X sin (t-)
C
K M 2
Dynamic Analysis
XS = F0/K
1
X
The solutions
may be
1/ 2
2
in
non-dimensional
X Swritten
2
2
as
form
1 2
2
tan
1
n
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Lesson 2
DAF for Fixed Platforms:
Worked Examples
H
15m
22.5m
15m
F
15m
A
Example 1
Consider the steel offshore structure with side
face as shown in the Figure and determine if a
static analysis is appropriate for a design wave
having height of 12 m and a period of 6 s. All four
sides of the structure are identical.
Vertical members have outside diameter of 1.2 m
and wall thickness of 38 mm. Horizontal and
diagonal members have outside diameter of 600
mm and wall thickness 13 mm.
When nodal loads of 100 kN each were applied at
joints D & H, the resulting horizontal displacement
was obtained as 26 mm by matrix methods.
The deck weighs 2220 kN & the support structure
weighs 2160 kN in air. The value of CM may be
assumed as 2. may be taken as 1.025 t/m3.
Assume a damping ratio of 5%.
Dynamic Analysis
H
15m
22.5m
15m
F
15m
E
Dynamic Analysis
C
22.5m
B
15m
A
10
H
15m
22.5m
15m
F
15m
Dynamic Analysis
H
15m
22.5m
15m
F
15m
A
1 1 2 2
n n n n
1/(0.9341+0.000335)1/2 = 1.0345
The dynamic response is only 3.45% above the
static response.
Hence a static analysis is appropriate.
Dynamic Analysis
11
Example 2
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
12
Dynamic Analysis
1 / 12 / 2
XXS S
2 22 2
2
2
1 22
1
n
n
n n
= 1/(0.7804+0.000187)1/2 = 1.132
The dynamic response is 13.2% above the
static response.
Hence a static analysis is not appropriate
and dynamic analysis is required.
Dynamic Analysis
13
Linearized Foundation
2% damping
Frequency Domain
Linear Airy Wave Theory
Transfer Functions
Wave Spectra
SCF
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
14
Lesson 3
Floating Structure Dynamics
Dynamic Analysis
15
Frequency Domain
Formulations
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
16
Dynamic Analysis
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Frequency (Hz)
Dynamic Analysis
17
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
18
Semisubmersible : Surge
Dynamic Analysis
Semisubmersible : Heave
Dynamic Analysis
19
At each step, the force vector is updated to take into account the
change in the mooring line tension. The equation of motion is solved by
an iterative procedure using unconditionally stable Newmark Beta
method or Wilson Theta Method.
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
20
Coupled/Uncoupled Analysis
Fully integrated analysis is a comprehensive analysis applying
simultaneous analysis of the platform and the mooring lines after
dividing them into various types of finite elements.
It is very
complicated, consumes large amount of time and the software available
are very costly. Also, the technology regarding this analysis has not yet
been completely developed.
Uncoupled analysis assumes the platform as a rigid body and the
mooring lines as linear spring supports.
Coupled analysis considers
a) Platform as rigid body and mooring line inputs given based on a
separate analysis done on mooring lines.
b) Mooring Lines made up of elements and platform motion inputs
given based on a separate analysis done on the platform. These
types of analysis are quiteDynamic
common
and preferred now.
Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
21