Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Todays discussion
Challenges in the healthcare value chain
The Provider Environment
The Medical Device Environment
The Value Chain Transformation
Driving Change
The Three Habits of Effective Value Chains
Life Sciences
Patient
Pharma
Biotech
Med Dev
Generic
Healthcare
Manufacturers,
Assemblers
Distributors,
Wholesalers
Providers,
Retailers
Consumers,
Patients
Manufacturer
Programs
Programs
Suppliers
Risk
Lack of
Visibility
Providers
Retailers
Patients
Consumers
Distribution
Materials
Manufacturing and
Mgmt
Risk
(Make-Pack)
Risk
Distributors
Risk
Inventory
Inefficiency
Waste
Lack of
Visibility
Risk
Cost
2007
2008
The different industry segments in the healthcare value chain often do not
trust each other. This has been a hindrance to information sharing and
collaboration which drives significant cost and inefficiencies.
Source: 2008 AMR Healthcare Study
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 7
Patients/Consumers
21%
21%
Healthcare Providers
19%
10%
Wholesalers/Distributors
17%
19%
10%
5%
Pharmacies
10%
Drug or Device
Manufacturers
10%
7%
4%
Government
6%
Inside-out focused
6%
4%
Payers/Managed
Care/Insurers/Employers
5%
GPO
PBM
2007
2008
2%
2%
1%
Manufacturers
Collaboration
High
Increasing demand
visibility by leveraging
various forms of
downstream data
Redesign of supply chain
networks - segmentation
Improving collaboration
between internal and
external partners
Improving efficiencies and
lowering costs
Supply chain
management is moving to
integrated environment
away from procurement
orientation
Establishing closer links
to manufacturers.
Increased accountability
and control of services
and pricing standardization
Hiring talent from other
industries
Retailers
Technology
Vendors
Wholesalers / Distributors
Moving from reacting to
anticipating demand
Establishing networks
but with limited upstream
collaboration
Extending technology
investment to providers
Moving to an information
broker model.
Moments
Of
Truth
Wholesaler
Manufacturer
Retailer
Provider
Low
Inside
Out
Outside
Business
Orientation
Provider
In
Re-thinking role of
intermediaries in the
healthcare value chain
Potential to leverage
treasure trove of
information on patient
One stop shop for
nutritional, health and
wellness not just for
food and Rx.
Focus on proprietary
differentiators.
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 9
The Provider
Environment
54%
51%
49%
34%
31%
All issues
32%
21%
22%
20%
15%
10%
5%
7%
7%
3%
3%
5%
Financial
Challenges
such as
profitability or
growth
Reimbursement
is not keeping
up with the rate
of expense
growth
Costs of
supplies are
rising at an
unsustainable
rate
Patient
Satisfaction
Government
Mandates
Patient Safety
and Quality
Personnel
Shortages
Capacity
Physician
recruiting/
retention
70%
All challenges
36%
28%
28%
26%
24%
13%
2%
Rising Cost of
Supplies
3%
4%
3%
3%
2%
Contract
Process w ith
Suppliers
Lack of
Consistent
Service in
Supply
Lack of SC
partnership
and visibility
w ith specialty
areas (OR,
Cath, IR, EP,
Radiology)
Lack of
leadership
vision,
m aturity and
control in the
SC
No
39%
Yes
61%
Manufacturers
12%
9%
Physicians
9%
GPOs
7%
Administration
7%
3%
3%
CEO/President
2%
2%
9%
4%
4%
17%
13%
9%
9%
4%
4%
4%
13%
13%
9%
Future:
Internal
Collaboration,
Visibility
Agility &
Profitability
9%
17%
13%
22%
Today:
4%
9%
9%
Cost &
Compliance
2007
4%
2012
Source: AMR Research Life Sciences Study 2007
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 16
23%
19%
19%
16%
16%
10%
10%
10%
10%
6%
6%
3%
Effective S&OP
process that
integrates
regional &
global
requirements
Global supply
chain network
that achieves
simultaneous
objectives on
quality, cost
and time-tomarket
Integrating
processes with
low-costcountry
suppliers
10%
10%
Effective
supplier
recruitment,
certification &
alignment
programs
Integration of
local market
needs within
global design,
research and
development
functions
Protecting
intellectual
property in
emerging
markets
3%
Retaining and
developing
supply chain
talent in key
markets
Which of the following is your companys most important operations capability today?
n= Medical Device Manu, 31
Which of the following is your companys most challenging operations capability today?
23%
Most Challenging
19%
19%
19%
16%
16%
13%
13%
13%
13%
10%
10%
3%
3%
Good relations
with payers and
providers for
visibility to
patient outcome
information
Effective
planning
processes to
translate past
outcome data
into future
forecast
requirements
Efficient business
processes and
information
systems to
process patient
outcome
information
3%
3%
3%
Moving beyond
discussions of
price toward
discussions of
disease
management,
patient outcomes,
etc.
Development of
wellness
programs that
provide patients
and providers with
incentives for
maintaining
healthy lives and
preventing illness
or injury
Building trust
across the
healthcare
value chain
Elimination of
policies and
practices that
discourage open
communication,
joint value
creation, etc.
Linking patient
outcomes with
treatment and
payment plans
Legislation or
regulation to drive
collaboration
across the
healthcare value
chain to improve
patient outcomes
Which of the following is most important to enable manufacturers, pharmacies, payers and providers to leverage patient outcome information?
Which of the following is most challenging to enable manufacturers, pharmacies, payers and providers to leverage patient outcome information?
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 18
Demand Visibility
Supply Visibility
Innovation
Commercial
Business
Implications (Planning)
&
Tradeoffs (Finance & Tax )
Customer
Segmentation
Model
Demand
Management
Supply
Supply
Capability
Capability
Sensed
Demand
Translation
Turntable
ERP
MES
Innovation
Shaping
Translations
Reliable
Reliable
Flexible
Flexible
Responsive
Responsive
Compliant
Compliant
Master Data
Analytics
Agility
Agility
by
by
Design
Design
Profitable
Profitable
Perfect
Perfect Order
Order
Demand
Visibility
&
Insights
Demand
Demand
Opportunity
Repository
Demand
Translation
3rd Party
Distributor
Forecast
Inv
Reliable,
Profitable
Response from
Supply Based
on Demand
Suppliers
S&OP
Internally Focused
Externally Focused
Perfect Orders
Demand - Driven
Value Driven
Network
Customer / Brand
Driven Control
Integrate
and Consolidate
Business Process
Infrastructure
Cost Focused
III IV
II I
Joint Value
Outcome
Focused
Performance
Management
Markets
Focused
Acquire
Merge
Partner
Legacy Growth
Business Units and Functions
Revenue Focused
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 22
Metaphor
Life Sciences
Median
Local business unit
Inside internal metrics
metrics
IT Strategy
Local IT organization,
governance systems and
standards
Stage 4
Demand Driven
Value Driven
Synchronization
Ecosystem
Efficiency , costs,
Standards
Transaction platforms
Integrated core metrics
LS
LS
Leaders
Leaders
Metrics
Consolidated and
standardized business
processes and
infrastructure
Boxes
Stage 3
Laggards
Laggards
Description
Stage 2
Outside in metrics
Transactional business
performance management
Speeds, feeds, cycle times,
service levels, adherence,
compliance
Collaboration metrics
Business IT partnership
Governance of the distributed IT
organization
IT Operations Excellence
Business leadership of
enabling IT
Business-skilled IT resources
embedded in business
processes
Right product
Design the
Build
Supply chain strategy
platforms
supply
organizational
response
systems and
manage talent
Demand networks
Design networks
Joint value
creation strategies
Innovation
methodologies
Supply chain
network design
Continuous
Improvement
Capabilities required
Align supply
relationships
Effective supply
networks
Execution of
buy-side strategies
Business Process
How do I do the right things right?
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 24
Commoditized
High
Commoditized
6
Technology
Technology
8
Specialized
Specialized
Long
Short
Long
Short
Lifecycle
Volume
Lifecycle
Commoditized
Commoditized
14
13
Technology
10
10
9
9
12
11
11
Technology
15
15
16
Specialized
Low
Specialized
Long
Short
Long
Short
Lifecycle
Lifecycle
Low
High
Demand Predictability
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 25
77%-94%
Perfect
Order
Cash-to-Cash
125-325 days
Inventory
Total
AP
Supplier
Quality
Cost
Detail
SCM
Cost
Supplier
On-Time
Production
Schedule
Variance
RM
Inv
Plant
Utilization
37%-69%
Utilization
AR
Purchase
Costs
WIP + FG
Inventory
Dir Mtl
Costs
Order
Cycle
Time
Perfect
Order
Detail
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Reacting
Anticipating
Collaborating
Orchestrating
Business Process
Consciously
Excellent
Organization
Consciously
Measurement
Consciously
Continuous
Improvement
Technology
Culture
Competent
incompetent
Unconsciously
incompetent
Inside out
Outside in
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 28
Demand
Forecast
Assess
Perfect
Order
Cash-to-Cash
Diagnose
Inventory
Total
AP
Supplier
Quality
Correct
Cost
Detail
SCM
Cost
Prdctn
Sched
Variance
Supplier
On-Time
Plant
Utilztn
WIP
Inv
FG
Inv
AR
Dir Mtl Costs
New
Prod.
TTM
Order Perfect
Cycle Order
Time Detail
Demand
Forecast
Below par
Assess
Perfect
Order
Cash-to-Cash
Diagnose
AP
Supplier
Quality
Correct
Cost
Detail
SCM
Cost
Inventory
Total
Supplier
On-Time
Production
Plant
Sched
Utilization
Variance
AR
Purch
Costs
WIP +
FG
Inventory
Order
Cycle
Time
Perfect
Order
Detail
Source: AMR Research supply chain benchmark data from 70+ Fortune 500 companies
67%
42%
75th percentile
and above
25th percentile
and below
Management Practice +
Lean
+8%
+20%
+2%
Intensity of IT Deployment +
25th percentile
and below
Business
Transformation
Enabled by IT
ERP + MES +
EMR + Etc.
75th percentile
and above
Source: London School of EconomicsMcKinsey survey and analysis of top 100 companies in
France, Germany, United Kingdom and United States / AMR Analysis
Capabilities
Demand
Visibility
Responsive
Supply
Predictable Supply (Right First Time) and Costs (COGS); Waste and Loss Elimination, Lean
Time
Driving Change
2007
2008
Strategic Partner
External Integration
Internal Integration
Fiefdoms
-
-Synchronized Activities
-Focus on organization
creating collaborative
opportunities with
customers and suppliers
- Visibility, Collaboration
and Planning Tools
Invoked
- Beginning connections
Between stations
- Leadership established
- Development of internal
- Metrics and system
- Focus on reducing self inflicted wounds
- Focus on (3) or (4) key stations
-Organization viewed
as strategic
differentiator
-Broad station span of
control
- Tightly integrated into
technology and NPDI
activities
- Expected to deliver
game changing
product and service
offerings
Standalone departments
Functional Independence
Separate Metrics
In-Fighting
Focus on one or (2) key stations
Reacting
Anticipating
Collaborating
Orchestrating
10
9
8
Enablers
Aligned metrics to serve the patient
Shared savings
Joint business process innovation
Cost-to-serve improvements
7
6
Collaborative
Practices
One off projects
Suppliers and hospitals have
different goals
Not integrated into hospital and
supplier workflows
5
4
3
2
Enablers
CPFR
VMI programs
Data sharing: EDI, B2B, and portals
Cost to Deliver
Questions to Ask
Provider to Manufacturer
Manufacturer to Provider
Data Source
Basis of Calculation
ERP + model
ERP + model
ERP + model
Simulation output
Simulation output
Simulation output
ERP + model
Modeled
Simulation output
Simulation output
Simulation output
Model input
Model input
Model input
PRODUCT COSTS
Raw Material
Conversion Costs (direct overhead)
Energy
SG&A COSTS
Transportation
Customer Service
Order Handling
A/R processing
Promotional Discounts on Price
ASSET RELATED COSTS
Special requests
Returns
Deducts
Price/Cost Index
Off Invoice Discounts
Standard Costs
Base
Price
Product and
Market Value
Adjustments
Unrecovered
Cost to Serve
Questions?
Hussain Mooraj
hmooraj@amrresearch.com
Cell: 617 823 9219
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 47