You are on page 1of 47

The Healthcare Value Chain Transformation:

A Time To Learn, Unlearn, and Relearn


MDISCC Presentation
May 20th, 2009

Hussain Mooraj Vice President, Healthcare & Life Sciences

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 1

Todays discussion
Challenges in the healthcare value chain
The Provider Environment
The Medical Device Environment
The Value Chain Transformation
Driving Change
The Three Habits of Effective Value Chains

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 2

AMR Research is an advisory and research


firm focused on global supply chain and
enterprise strategies.

Not consultants provide research based


advice

Industries we focus on:


Consumer Products (16 of top 20 firms)
Healthcare & Life Sciences (18 of top
20)
Industrial Manufacturing (13 of top 15
discrete manufacturers)
Retail (14 of top 20)

Retained advisory services and peer


networking forums.

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 3

AMR Healthcare Value Chain Coverage Model

Life Sciences

Patient

Pharma
Biotech
Med Dev
Generic

Healthcare

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 4

The Healthcare Value


Chain Overview

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 5

Todays Realitythe healthcare value chain lacks visibility


Suppliers,
CMOs

Manufacturers,
Assemblers

Distributors,
Wholesalers

Providers,
Retailers

Consumers,
Patients

New Product or Service

Manufacturer
Programs
Programs

Suppliers

Risk
Lack of
Visibility

Providers
Retailers
Patients
Consumers
Distribution

Materials
Manufacturing and
Mgmt
Risk
(Make-Pack)
Risk
Distributors
Risk
Inventory
Inefficiency

Waste

Lack of
Visibility

Risk
Cost

Supply chains designed with inside-out processes in mind sub-optimized,


constrained by silos
Lack of end-to-end visibility and a Value Network Operations Strategy
Integrated information but disconnected processes and visibility for trade offs
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 6

Is there a lack of trust with your trading partners?

2007

2008

The different industry segments in the healthcare value chain often do not
trust each other. This has been a hindrance to information sharing and
collaboration which drives significant cost and inefficiencies.
Source: 2008 AMR Healthcare Study
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 7

Who is the customer?


19%

Patients/Consumers

21%
21%

Healthcare Providers

19%
10%

Wholesalers/Distributors

17%
19%

Doctors and Clinicians

10%
5%

Pharmacies

10%

Drug or Device
Manufacturers

10%
7%

Who is the customer that


you serve?

4%

Government

6%

Inside-out focused

6%

Companies lack outside-in


vision not focused on
patient outcome-based
Moments of Truth

4%

Payers/Managed
Care/Insurers/Employers

5%

GPO

PBM

2007
2008

2%
2%
1%

Who is your PRIMARY customer?

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 8

Leaders are transforming strategies and business models


Game Changing
Patient-Driven
Outcome Based

Manufacturers

Collaboration

High
Increasing demand
visibility by leveraging
various forms of
downstream data
Redesign of supply chain
networks - segmentation
Improving collaboration
between internal and
external partners
Improving efficiencies and
lowering costs

Supply chain
management is moving to
integrated environment
away from procurement
orientation
Establishing closer links
to manufacturers.
Increased accountability
and control of services
and pricing standardization
Hiring talent from other
industries

Retailers
Technology
Vendors

Wholesalers / Distributors
Moving from reacting to
anticipating demand
Establishing networks
but with limited upstream
collaboration
Extending technology
investment to providers
Moving to an information
broker model.

Moments
Of
Truth

Wholesaler

Manufacturer

Retailer

Provider

Low
Inside
Out

Outside

Business
Orientation

Provider

In

Re-thinking role of
intermediaries in the
healthcare value chain
Potential to leverage
treasure trove of
information on patient
One stop shop for
nutritional, health and
wellness not just for
food and Rx.
Focus on proprietary
differentiators.
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 9

The Provider
Environment

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 10

Top issues confronting hospitals


59%

Financial challenges are top of mind for executives at smaller


systems and the pace of reimbursement is a major issue for the
larger hospital systems.

54%
51%

49%

34%

31%

All issues

32%

Most significant issue


27%

21%

22%

20%

15%
10%
5%

7%

7%
3%

3%
5%

Financial
Challenges
such as
profitability or
growth

Reimbursement
is not keeping
up with the rate
of expense
growth

Care for the


Uninsured

Costs of
supplies are
rising at an
unsustainable
rate

Patient
Satisfaction

Government
Mandates

Patient Safety
and Quality

Personnel
Shortages

Capacity

Physician
recruiting/
retention

N = [65, 2+ hospital systems]

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 11

Challenges to existing healthcare supply chain model


The rising cost of supplies and the ability to drive physician preferences are seen as the most
significant challenges. Most executives are focusing their supply chains to solve these issues.
87%

Quote from $2B+ Hospital System:


Seeing supply cost growing at twice the cost of
labor.in a service industry thats scary and requires
attention.

70%

We cut contracts in half and doubled spend - we want


fewer SKUs to make our supply chain more efficient.
41%

All challenges
36%

Most significant challenge


29%

28%

28%

26%

24%

13%
2%

Rising Cost of
Supplies

N = [121, Total sample]

Ability to drive Com plexity of


rationalization product and
of physician
inform ation
product
flow
preferences

3%

4%

3%

3%

2%

Contract
Process w ith
Suppliers

Lack of
Consistent
Service in
Supply

Lack of SC
partnership
and visibility
w ith specialty
areas (OR,
Cath, IR, EP,
Radiology)

Lim ited Best


Practice
Sharing

Lack of
leadership
vision,
m aturity and
control in the
SC

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 12

A formal supply chain organization


Q 67. Do you have a formal supply chain organization (e.g., a group that focuses on the optimum sourcing of materials as well as the coordination and planning for the delivery of
products?

Even though 61% of hospitals report


having a supply chain organization AMR
strongly believes that many of these
hospitals dont understand the true
meaning of supply chain.

No
39%

This however, is changing with the


incorporation of talent from outside of the
industry.

Yes
61%

Among hospitals that have a supply chain


organization 94% have had one in place
for 4 years or more.
Reporting structure of SC org is all over
the map.

N = [65, 2+ hospital systems]

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 13

Has the greatest potential to resolve challenges


35%

Manufacturers
12%

Distributors & Wholesalers


Service Providers

9%

Physicians

9%

GPOs

7%

Administration

7%

Especially amongst larger systems, the


manufacturers were deemed to have the
greatest potential to solve these challenges.
AMR sees this as a great opportunity to create
differentiation via supply chain services.

Quote from $500M+ Hospitals:


7%

The end user/patient


Government
Supply chain/purchasing

3%
3%

CEO/President

2%

Combination of all involved

2%

Were looking to the manufacturer to drive efficiency in


our SC. They have the knowledge, money and resources
to drive visibility solutions.
We're working closely with a manufacturer to drive down
costs in our supply chain. This has definitely translated
into more market share for them.
Manufacturer X sales reps can speak the operational
game/supply chain game vs. other manufacturers reps.

N = [65, 2+ hospital systems]

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 14

The Medical Device


Environment

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 15

Med Dvc Primary Product Supply Business Strategy


Improve collaboration in your enterprise with internal partners across
R&D, Manufacturing, Supply Chain and Sales & Marketing

9%

Replicating best practices across the enterprise using operational


excellence programs such as QM, Six Sigma, RFT

4%

Improve manufacturing performance visibility across manufacturing


sites

4%

17%
13%

Redesign of your supply chain networks

9%

Standardize manufacturing processes and systems

9%

Improve efficiencies and lower costs across the enterprise

4%

Manufacturing outsourcing as an opportunity to boost productivity


and efficiency

4%

Identify and eliminate waste in manufacturing using lean


manufacturing practices

4%

13%
13%

9%

Future:
Internal
Collaboration,
Visibility
Agility &
Profitability

9%
17%
13%

Detailed production scheduling, and adherence


Improve collaboration with your external partners such as Contract
Manufacturers, 3rd Party Logistics, Customers

22%

Today:

4%

Improve compliance across financial, manufacturing and quality


processes

9%

Increase insight into downstream demand using near real-time data


from the distributors and other intermediaries (e.g. PBMs)

9%

Cost &
Compliance
2007

Product authentication, track and trace, integrity of supply chain

4%

2012
Source: AMR Research Life Sciences Study 2007
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 16

Most important versus most challenging supply chain


operations capability today in medical device
companies
Most Important
Most Challenging
29%

Supply Chain has abdicated


joint value creation to the
commercial organization.

23%
19%

19%
16%

Leaders recognize this is a


lost opportunity!

16%
10%

10%

10%

10%

6%

6%
3%

Effective S&OP
process that
integrates
regional &
global
requirements

Global supply
chain network
that achieves
simultaneous
objectives on
quality, cost
and time-tomarket

Integrating
processes with
low-costcountry
suppliers

Effective go-tomarket strategy


for new
products

10%

10%

Effective
supplier
recruitment,
certification &
alignment
programs

Integration of
local market
needs within
global design,
research and
development
functions

Protecting
intellectual
property in
emerging
markets

3%

Retaining and
developing
supply chain
talent in key
markets

Tight links (joint


value creation)
with customers
to obtain
supply/demand
visibility

Which of the following is your companys most important operations capability today?
n= Medical Device Manu, 31

AMR Healthcare Survey Nov 2008

Which of the following is your companys most challenging operations capability today?

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 17

Most important versus challenging to enable manufacturers, pharmacies,


payers and providers to leverage patient outcome information
Most Important

23%

Most Challenging
19%

19%
19%

16%

16%
13%

13%
13%

13%
10%
10%

3%
3%
Good relations
with payers and
providers for
visibility to
patient outcome
information

Effective
planning
processes to
translate past
outcome data
into future
forecast
requirements

n= Medical Device Manu, 31

Efficient business
processes and
information
systems to
process patient
outcome
information

3%

3%

3%
Moving beyond
discussions of
price toward
discussions of
disease
management,
patient outcomes,
etc.

Development of
wellness
programs that
provide patients
and providers with
incentives for
maintaining
healthy lives and
preventing illness
or injury

Building trust
across the
healthcare
value chain

Elimination of
policies and
practices that
discourage open
communication,
joint value
creation, etc.

Linking patient
outcomes with
treatment and
payment plans

Legislation or
regulation to drive
collaboration
across the
healthcare value
chain to improve
patient outcomes

Which of the following is most important to enable manufacturers, pharmacies, payers and providers to leverage patient outcome information?
Which of the following is most challenging to enable manufacturers, pharmacies, payers and providers to leverage patient outcome information?
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 18

The Value Chain Transformation

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 19

The State of Supply Chain in Life Sciences


Supply chain processes are ever-changing. We need to learn, to
unlearn to relearnorganizational lobotomy? Generic shock therapy?
Teams are focused on the synchronization of demand and the most
profitable response. This is a significant shift.
Today, there is a recognition that there is not one supply chain, and
that supply chains need to be designed not inherited. As a result,
there is a shift to aligning supply chain strategy with business strategy
and designing the supply response.
A focus on cross-functional excellence is necessary to drive
improvements (S&OP, NPI, Commercialization, Supplier
Development, etc). The key is metric alignment to drive the right
response.
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 20

The Core Elements of the Demand Driven Value Chain


Business &
Risk Tradeoffs
Demand
Translation

Demand Visibility

Supply Visibility

Innovation

Commercial

Business
Implications (Planning)
&
Tradeoffs (Finance & Tax )

Customer
Segmentation
Model

Demand
Management

Supply
Supply
Capability
Capability

Sensed
Demand
Translation

Turntable

ERP
MES

Innovation
Shaping
Translations

Reliable
Reliable
Flexible
Flexible
Responsive
Responsive
Compliant
Compliant

Master Data
Analytics

Agility
Agility
by
by
Design
Design
Profitable
Profitable
Perfect
Perfect Order
Order

Demand
Visibility
&
Insights

Demand
Demand
Opportunity

Repository

Common Process Platforms


& Processes (eg S&OP)

Demand
Translation

3rd Party

Distributor
Forecast

Inv

Reliable,
Profitable
Response from
Supply Based
on Demand

Suppliers

The Downstream Data Architecture Model


Operations
&
Product Supply

Downstream Data/ Application Stack

Customers and Patients

S&OP

Takeaway: Visibility and collaboration are key,


but risk/opportunity tradeoffs are inherent
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 21

Value Chain Transformation/Change Maturity


Responsive to Demand Growth and Profitability
Cost to Deliver Cost to Deliver
Cost to Serve

Internally Focused

Externally Focused

Perfect Orders

Demand - Driven

Value Driven
Network

Build and Extend


Core
Demand Management
Processes

Customer / Brand
Driven Control
Integrate
and Consolidate
Business Process
Infrastructure

Cost Focused

III IV
II I

Growth & Market Share


Cost to Serve
Profitable Perfect Orders
Profitability (sku /shelf / account /
segment)

Joint Value
Outcome
Focused
Performance
Management

Markets
Focused

Acquire
Merge
Partner
Legacy Growth
Business Units and Functions

Revenue Focused
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 22

Value Chain Transformation Journey


Stage 1
Markets Focused

Metaphor

Focused on local markets and


products

Focused on consolidated &


standardized controls and
efficiency

Boxes & Lines

Life Sciences
Median
Local business unit
Inside internal metrics
metrics

Business /Geography Unit


performance
Market Share / revenue
Revenue

IT Strategy

Local IT organization,
governance systems and
standards

Stage 4

Demand Driven

Value Driven

Extended set of integrated lean,


business and supply chain
processes.
Integrated front office
Integrated back office
Focused on outward facing
demand and supplier management
efficiency

Joint Value Creation Profitable


relationships with upstream &
downstream network partners
Focus on outside in demand
translation into joint value

Synchronization

Ecosystem

Efficiency , costs,
Standards
Transaction platforms
Integrated core metrics

Centralized IT leadership &


standards, consolidated
platforms, data, and
infrastructure

LS
LS
Leaders
Leaders

Metrics

Consolidated and
standardized business
processes and
infrastructure

Boxes

Stage 3

Customer & Brand


Control

Distributed business units


and functions

Laggards
Laggards

Description

Stage 2

Inside out metrics

Outside in metrics

Transactional business
performance management
Speeds, feeds, cycle times,
service levels, adherence,
compliance
Collaboration metrics

Joint value creation


relationships and networks
Profitable perfect orders
Relationship process
management metrics

Business IT partnership
Governance of the distributed IT
organization
IT Operations Excellence

Business leadership of
enabling IT
Business-skilled IT resources
embedded in business
processes

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 23

Leaders Make The Link To Business Value Explicit


Business Strategy
What are the right things to do to increase company value?

Value Chain Strategy


What are the right ways to support the business strategy?
What are your companies priorities?
Align demand
relationships

Right product
Design the
Build
Supply chain strategy
platforms
supply
organizational
response
systems and
manage talent

Demand networks

Design networks

Joint value
creation strategies

Innovation
methodologies

Supply chain
network design

Continuous
Improvement
Capabilities required

Align supply
relationships
Effective supply
networks
Execution of
buy-side strategies

Business Process
How do I do the right things right?
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 24

Segmenting the Supply Chain Volume, demand


variability, technology and life cycle

Commoditized
High

Commoditized
6

Technology

Technology
8

Specialized

Specialized
Long

Short

Long

Short

Lifecycle

Volume

Lifecycle

Commoditized

Commoditized
14

13

Technology

10
10

9
9

12

11
11

Technology
15
15

16
Specialized
Low

Specialized
Long

Short

Long

Short

Lifecycle

Lifecycle

Low

High

Demand Predictability
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 25

The Hierarchy of Supply Chain Metrics:


Availability and Perfect Order to Patients
20%-65% Error
Demand
Forecast

77%-94%

Perfect
Order

Cash-to-Cash

125-325 days

Inventory
Total

AP
Supplier
Quality

Cost
Detail

SCM
Cost

Supplier
On-Time

Production
Schedule
Variance

RM
Inv

Plant
Utilization

37%-69%
Utilization

AR
Purchase
Costs

WIP + FG
Inventory

Dir Mtl
Costs

Order
Cycle
Time

Perfect
Order
Detail

Source: AMR Benchmark Analytix


2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 26

The Key is Balance


SCM Costs

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 27

What Does Good Look Like?

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Reacting

Anticipating

Collaborating

Orchestrating

Business Process

Consciously
Excellent

Organization

Consciously
Measurement

Consciously

Continuous
Improvement
Technology
Culture

Competent

incompetent
Unconsciously
incompetent

Inside out

Outside in
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 28

PharmaCo Example Unconsciously Incompetent?


Key:
Above par
On par
Below par

Demand
Forecast

Assess
Perfect
Order

Cash-to-Cash

Diagnose

Inventory
Total

AP
Supplier
Quality

Correct
Cost
Detail

SCM
Cost

Prdctn
Sched
Variance

Supplier
On-Time

Plant
Utilztn

Raw Mtl Purch


Inv
Costs

WIP
Inv

FG
Inv

AR
Dir Mtl Costs

New
Prod.
TTM

Order Perfect
Cycle Order
Time Detail

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 29

Example Company D: Orchestrating


Consciously Excellent
Key:
Above par
On par

Demand
Forecast

Below par

Assess
Perfect
Order

Cash-to-Cash

Diagnose
AP
Supplier
Quality

Correct
Cost
Detail

SCM
Cost

Inventory
Total
Supplier
On-Time

Production
Plant
Sched
Utilization
Variance

AR
Purch
Costs

WIP +
FG
Inventory

Dir Mtl Costs

Order
Cycle
Time

Perfect
Order
Detail

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 30

Improving business operations through better visibility


Better demand forecasters have..
24% less raw material inventory
22% less finished goods inventory
21% shorter cash-to-cash cycle times
32% shorter days sales outstanding
22% better plant utilization
9% lower SC costs representing approximately 5% of revenue

Source: AMR Research supply chain benchmark data from 70+ Fortune 500 companies

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 31

Leaders get benefits from visibility in life sciences


Level of change seen amongst better demand forecasters
in profitability performance over the last 12 months

Benefits realized as a result of


demand forecast accuracy improvement

67%
42%

Source: 2008 AMR Healthcare Study


2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 32

Whats needed to move to the next level? Combine


process, technology and best practices

75th percentile
and above

25th percentile
and below

Management Practice +

Lean

+8%

+20%

+2%

Intensity of IT Deployment +
25th percentile
and below

Business
Transformation
Enabled by IT

ERP + MES +
EMR + Etc.

75th percentile
and above

Source: London School of EconomicsMcKinsey survey and analysis of top 100 companies in
France, Germany, United Kingdom and United States / AMR Analysis

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 33

Roadmap to the Demand-Driven Transformation

Capabilities

Value Network Performance Management

Demand
Visibility

Automatic / Responsive Replenishment


and Demand Shaping
Global Product, Supply, and Network Optimization
Value Network Redesign
Downstream Customer and Consumer Capabilities
Segmented Channel Management, Cost to Service

Responsive
Supply

Demand Intelligence, OperationsSales Planning Process and Collaboration


Value Chain Performance Metrics, and Master Data Management
Costs to Deliver, Operations Excellence, Measurement Strategy, Cycle Time
Harmonizing Core Business Processes, Leveraging IT Investments, Costs to Deliver,
Strategic Governance, Value Chain Continues Improvements Strategies

Predictable Supply (Right First Time) and Costs (COGS); Waste and Loss Elimination, Lean

Time

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 34

Driving Change

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 35

Whos going to drive change?

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 36

How will changes occur to build trust and collaboration


within the healthcare value chain?

2007

2008

Sentiment favors government intervention


But the healthcare industry is divided as to
level of involvement
Source: 2008 AMR
Healthcare Study
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 37

Supply Chain Model for Life Sciences

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 38

Supply Chain Talent /Organizational Evolution


Maturity mapping to the Demand Driven maturity model

Strategic Partner

External Integration

Internal Integration

Fiefdoms
-

-Synchronized Activities
-Focus on organization
creating collaborative
opportunities with
customers and suppliers
- Visibility, Collaboration
and Planning Tools
Invoked

- Beginning connections
Between stations
- Leadership established
- Development of internal
- Metrics and system
- Focus on reducing self inflicted wounds
- Focus on (3) or (4) key stations

-Organization viewed
as strategic
differentiator
-Broad station span of
control
- Tightly integrated into
technology and NPDI
activities
- Expected to deliver
game changing
product and service
offerings

Standalone departments
Functional Independence
Separate Metrics
In-Fighting
Focus on one or (2) key stations
Reacting

Anticipating

Collaborating

Orchestrating

Demand Driven Stage


2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 39

Are you building collaborative practices or developing


collaborative relationships?
Collaborative
Relationships
Relationship and process driven
Continuous improvement to drive
joint value creation
Redesign for value
Aligned metrics to the shelf
Performance-driven business
networks

10
9
8

Enablers
Aligned metrics to serve the patient
Shared savings
Joint business process innovation
Cost-to-serve improvements

7
6

Collaborative
Practices
One off projects
Suppliers and hospitals have
different goals
Not integrated into hospital and
supplier workflows

5
4
3
2

Enablers
CPFR
VMI programs
Data sharing: EDI, B2B, and portals
Cost to Deliver

Takeaway: Develop the vision that moves your organization


towards collaborative relationships
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 40

Questions to Ask
Provider to Manufacturer

Manufacturer to Provider

1. If I give you data, how


will you use it?
2. How do you give
incentives to your
sales team to drive
value?
3. How do you measure
effectiveness?
4. What matters the
most: cost to serve or
cost to deliver?
5. What differentiates
your brand, and how
committed are you to
innovation?

1. How good is your data


today? Where are you
going in the future?
2. What is your gap
between planning and
execution? How are
you closing this gap?
3. How do you measure
performance?
4. How committed are
you to driving
innovation for the
patient?

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 41

JVC Discussions Must Transcend Costs


Cost to Deliver
GPM = Price-Commission-COGS
Distribution costs expensed separately

Sales Reps commissioned on full price


GPM appears to be maximized
What about write-offs?
Cost to Serve
What impact could JVC efforts have on write-offs?
Could expedited freight costs decrease?
Could decreased commissions be supplemented with process
incentives, service incentives?

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 42

Basic Cost to Serve


Cost Factors Considered

Data Source

Basis of Calculation

ERP + model
ERP + model
ERP + model

Product mix with Bill of Material


Production line utilization from model input
Production line mix

Simulation output
Simulation output
Simulation output
ERP + model
Modeled

Frequency of LTL, TL, CL shipments


% and Frequency of orders processed
% of total activity annually
Quantity x cost per transaction, DSO comparisons
Promotional rules and order data by customer

Simulation output
Simulation output
Simulation output

Inventory investment x carrying cost rate


Number of orders processed
Number of orders processed by warehouse

Model input
Model input
Model input

Special orders separated in demand data


Separated in demand data analysis
Separated in demand data analysis

PRODUCT COSTS

Raw Material
Conversion Costs (direct overhead)
Energy
SG&A COSTS

Transportation
Customer Service
Order Handling
A/R processing
Promotional Discounts on Price
ASSET RELATED COSTS

Inventory carrying cost


Production Change over
Warehouse costs
SPECIAL HANDLING COSTS

Special requests
Returns
Deducts

Source: OnPoint Group


2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 43

Profitability Conventional Contracting View of the Price Waterfall

Price/Cost Index
Off Invoice Discounts

Standard Costs

Performance Based On-Invoice


Discounts

Missing Granular Insight into true Cost to Serve


Courtesy 2009 Model N, Inc. Model Performance Analytics
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 44

True Profitability View of the Price Waterfall


Extended Price/ Cost Index

Market Driven Price


Reductions

Base
Price

Product and
Market Value
Adjustments

Performance Based Rebates, Admin Fees,


Channel Settlements, Promos

Negotiated On and Off


Invoice Discounts

Asset Related Costs


Special Handling Costs

Unrecovered
Cost to Serve

Courtesy 2009 Model N, Inc. Model Performance Analytics


2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 45

Three habits of effective value chains


Focused and strategic investments in trading partners
o
o
o

Aligned incentives for collaboration


Enhance understanding and know-how of partners business
Development of trading partners

Effective management of knowledge and information


flows amongst trading partners
o
o

Sharing of information in a timely manner


Product and process improvement initiatives

Building trust amongst trading partners


o
o
o

Reduces transaction cost


Monitor and measure performance
Evaluating relationships on more than just cost

2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 46

Questions?

Hussain Mooraj
hmooraj@amrresearch.com
Cell: 617 823 9219
2009 AMR Research, Inc. | Page 47

You might also like