Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPARATUS:
Pycnometer, Drying Oven, Balance, Distilled water, Glass rod, pipette, 4.75
mm
PROCEDURE:
1. Weigh a clean dry pycnometer with the cap accurate to 0.01 g (W1).
2. Place oven-dry soil passing 4.75 mm I.S. Sieve into the pycnometer and weigh
it (W2). Soil taken will fill up one-third of the bottle.
3. Fill the pycnometer to half its height with distilled water and mix it thoroughly
with glass rod. Replace the screw top after applying grease to the screw top
and fill the pycnometer, flush with hole in the conical cap.
Dry the
CALCULATIONS:
The specific gravity, G is calculated from
(W2W1) Gt
Gs =
(W4W1) (W3W2)
DISCUSSION:
Although the procedure is very simple, reliable results can be obtained only if
great care is exercised in the removal of entrapped air. The specific gravity of an
inorganic soil normally ranges from 2.50 to 2.80.
OBSERVATIONS:
Weight of pycnometer (W1)
Temperature of water T 0C
COMMENT:
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
RESULT:
Specific gravity of Kerosene
Specific gravity of clay sample
COMMENT:
Dry the
1
(W3 W4)
where
100
Gs
W1 =
Weight of pycnometer
W2 =
W3 =
W4 =
Gs =
COMMENT:
OBSERVATIONS:
Container No.
Wt. Of Container (g)
Wt. of Container + Wet Soil
(g)
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil
(g)
Water content (%) =
RESULT:
i.
Liquid limit of the soil
( w L)
ii.
(w P )
iii.
COMMENT:
A. SIEVE ANALYSIS
AIM:
To determine the effective size and the uniformity coefficient of a given
sample of soil
APPARATUS:
One set of sieves, cleaning brush, balance and a weight box.
THEORY:
The size of the individual grain is an important factor governing soil behaviour
and therefore, the most common soil test is the grain size analysis. The results can be
represented by numerical value that indicate some characteristic grain size and the
degree of uniformity. Allen Hazen, after performing a number of tests with filter
materials concluded that in loose state the permeability of these soils depends on the
effective size and the uniformity coefficient. The effective size is defined as the size
of material corresponding to 10% on the grain size distribution curve, denoted by D10.
This means 10% of the particles are finer and 90% are coarser than the effective size.
The uniformity coefficient is the ratio of D60 to D10 and is denoted by Cu. It gives the
measure of grading of the soil. A high uniformity coefficient means a low degree of
uniformity or a well-graded material.
If Cu is less than 5, the soil is uniform or poorly graded.
Cu is between 5 and 15 the soil is medium graded.
Cu is more than 15, the soil is well graded.
PROCEDURE:
1. Arrange the sieves of size 4.75mm, 2.00mm, 1.00mm, 600 micron, 425
micron, 150 micron and 75 micron, in the order of decreasing aperture size,
after ensuring that all of them are clean. The receiver is placed at the bottom.
10
2. Take 1 kg of dry soil in the top-most sieve. The lid is kept in position.
3. Shake the sieve for about 15 minutes holding the sieves inclined at angle of 15
Degrees to the vertical. The shaking is done in a circular motion or use the
sieve shaker for the purpose.
4. Determine the weight of soil retained on each sieve and tabulate the results.
5. Draw the 'grain-size distribution curve' with the logarithm of the aperture size
on X-axis and the percentage passing through the sieve on Y-axis. Fit in a
smooth curve and determine the values of D10 and D60.
6. Calculate the value of uniformity coefficient and the coefficient of curvature
(C c).
S.
No.
IS Sieve
No.
Aperture
Size in mm
4.75
4.75
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
600 microns
0.600
425 microns
0.425
150 microns
0.150
75 microns
0.075
Pan
Wt. of soils
retained
% Wt.
retained
Cumulative %
Wt. Retained
---
RESULT:
1. Effective size,
D10 =
2. Uniformity coefficient,
Cu =
3. Coefficient of curvature CC =
COMMENT:
D60 / D10
% passing
through
11
AIM:
To determine the in-situ density of soil using a core cutter.
APPARATUS:
Core cutter, Steel Rammer, Steel Dolly, Balance, Steel rule, Pick-axe, Straight
edge and Drying oven.
PROCEDURE:
=
2
=
=
12
S.
No
1
Container No.
10
11
12
RESULT:
1. In situ density of soil (bulk) t
g/cc
g/cc
COMMENT:
13
14
8. Place the sand pouring cylinder over the excavated the hole and let the sand
run down. When the flow has ceased, close valve and find the weight of the
sand pouring cylinder (W5).
9. Find the weight of the excavated earth collected in the tray (W6).
10. Take a small representative sample of the soil in a container for determination
of moisture content.
CALCULATIONS:
I. BULK DENSITY OF SAND USED
1. Weight of sand filling the conical spreader (g)
= (W1 W2) =
2. Weight of sand filling the spreader and the calibrating can.(g) = (W2 W3) =
3. Weight of sand filling the calibrating can alone (g) = (W2 W3) (W1 W2) =
4. Volume of the calibrating can (cc)
=
=
=
15
g / cm 3
g / cm 3
g / cm 3
COMMENT:
16
1000 cc. It is provided with flanges near the top and bottom
ends which aid in assembling the mould, the top cap and the perforated base plate. A
rubber gasket provided under the top cap ensures water tightness. The top perforated
plate is used to check swelling tendency of the specimen which occurs with certain
soils.
The top cap has an inner seating to suit the 0.2 litre cuter which is to be used
for testing undisturbed specimens. The vertical stem fitted to the top cap is meant for
fixing a stand pipe or a constant level overhead tank depending upon the test
conditions.
The whole assembly is placed in the bottom tank having a water outlet for
permitting accurate control of the water level for falling head tests. The bolts of the
perforated base plate keep the permeameter mould assembly slightly raised in the
bottom tank allowing free flow of water through the base perforating. For soils with
low permeability the falling head test is most applicable.
PROCEDURE:
Take a known quantity of dry soil and mix up thoroughly with the required
percentage of water. Alternately determine the moisture content of an already given
moist-soil. Calculate the weight of the wet soil to give the intended dry density when
occupying the permeameter mould.
The weight of wet soils required
= W = 300 (1+w)
17
sq. cm
sq. cm
cm
h1
cm
h2
cm
= Time in seconds
cm
18
OBSERVATIONS:
S.
No
.
1
Time t (sec)
Initial Head
h1 (cm)
Final Head
h2 (cm)
2
3
4
RESULT:
Coefficient of permeability of the given soil sample =
COMMENT:
log 10 (h1 /
h 2)
K (cm/sec)
19
=
=
=
=
Time (t)
(Sec)
Head (h)
(cm)
Quantity
(cc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average permeability, k =
RESULT:
Coefficient of permeability of the given soil sample =
COMMENT:
=
=
=
=
Permeability K
(cm / sec.)
20
PROCEDURE:
1. Determine the weight of the empty mould (W1) Assemble the base and collar
and apply a thin coat of oil inside.
2. Weight about 2.5 kg of soil passing through sieve I.S. 4.75 mm into a tray and
spread it.
3. Add a known quantity of water and mix the soil thoroughly.
4. Place the moist soil in the mould in three layers. Compact each layer with 25
blows of the rammer falling through 30 cm. The blows should be uniformly
spread over the entire surface of the soil. Each layer is scarified before the
next one is spread for proper bond. The final compacted soil should extend
slightly beyond the top of the mould into the collar.
5. Rotate the collar slightly and remove it by pulling it upwards slowly.
6. Trim the soil with a straight edge and level the top of the mould. Remove the
soil cake from the base and weigh it (W2).
7. Take a representative sample of soil from the cake for water content
determination after it is taken out using an extractor.
8. Increase the water content in increments depending upon the rate of increase
in the weight of the soil and its decrease later.
9. Repeat the observations as at 6 and 7 above with each water content.
CALCULATIONS:
Weight of empty mould
= W1 g
= W2 g
21
= w
Weight of soil
= (W2 - W1) g
= 1000 cc
g/cc
OBSERVATIONS:
S.
No.
Container
No.
Wt. of empty
container (g)
Wt. of
Wt. of container
container with
with wet soil (g)
dry soil (g)
Moisture
content %
1
2
3
4
5
S.
No
.
1
Wt. of
empty
mould (g)
Wt. of
compacted soil
(g)
Bulk density
of soil (g/cc)
2
3
4
5
RESULT:
1. Optimum moisture content
COMMENT:
Moisture
content %
Dry
density
(g/cc)
22
AIM:
To determine the undrained shear strength of a remoulded soil sample.
APPARATUS:
Proctor mould with its accessories, Proving ring, loading frame.
PROCEDURE:
1. Apply thin layer of oil to the mould, collar and base plate.
2. Take 2.5 kg of the given soil sample and mix thoroughly with a known
quantity of water.
3. Compact the sample in the mould in three layers with 25 blows on each layer.
Take care to scarify the layer before the next layer is spread.
4. Remove the collar, trim the sample to the top of the mould with a spatula.
5. Extract the sample from the mould and place it in the loading unit.
6. Apply the load at the rate of 1.25 mm/min.
7. Measure the load at regular intervals of strain in the specimen. Note down the
calibration of the Proving ring.
8. Tabulate the readings and draw a graph - load vs. deformation and read the
ultimate load.
9. Calculate average area of cross section using:
A = Ao/(1-)
where
Ao
h / ho
ho
change in length
23
Diameter of Specimen
= d
cm
= ho =
cm
OBSERVATIONS:
S.
No
Time
%
Strain
Sp2
Load
Sp3
Average
area of
cross
section
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Graphs:
1. Draw the stress-strain curve
2. Draw the Mohrs circle and determine Cu.
RESULT:
Unconfined compressive strength of the soil sample =
Undrained Cohesion of the soil sample
COMMENT:
Stress
kN/m2
24
Normal stress
2
(Kg / Cm )
Max. reading on
proving ring dial
gauge
Max. Shear
force (T)
1
2
3
4
GRAPH:
Soil parameters are obtained from the graph.
RESULT:
C
=
=
COMMENT:
kN
Shear stress
2
(Kg / Cm )
25
=W1
=V1
3. Wt. of mould + soil sample(filled in spiral motion) = W2 (in the loosest state)
4. Wt. of mould + soil sample (filled in layers)
26
CALCULATIONS:
Relative Density
Where
emax. =
emin.
{ e
( Gw / d ) 1 }
RESULT:
Relative density of the soil sample
COMMENT:
27
PROCEDURE:
1. Preparation of soil paste: Take about 100g of soil passing 425 micron IS sieve.
2. Place about 30 g of the above sample in a dish and mix it thoroughly with
distilled water. Water added should be about 2 to 3 times the liquid limit to
make a thin slurry.
3. Clean the shrinkage dish and determine its weight accurately. Place the dish in
an evaporating dish and fill the shrinkage dish with mercury till it overflows.
Then remove the dish and press a flat plate on top to remove excess mercury.
Wipe off any mercury adhering to the out side of the shrinkage dish. Weigh
the mercury to find volume of the dish.
4. Coat the inner side of the shrinkage dish with a thin layer of vaseline/grease.
Pour the soil slurry into the dish with help of a spatula. Tap the dish gently on
a rubber sheet and allow the paste to flow towards the edges. Repeat the
process till the dish is completely filled and the excess soil overflows. Strike
off the excess soil paste with a straight edge. Wipe off the soil adhering to the
out side of the dish.
5. Weigh the shrinkage dish and keep it in the oven at 1050 for 24 hours.
Remove and place the dish in a desiccator and weigh it immediately.
6. Keep the glass cup in a china dish. Fill the cup with mercury and remove the
excess mercury by pressing the glass plate with the three prongs firmly over
the top of the cup. Transfer the cup into another china dish and place the oven
28
dried soil pat on the surface of mercury. Press carefully the pat into the
mercury by pressing it by the glass plate having three metal prongs. Collect
the displaced mercury and weigh. The volume of the dry soil pat is then
determined by dividing this weight by the unit weight of mercury.
OBSERVATIONS:
Description
RESULT:
1. Shrinkage Limit
2. Shrinkage ratio
3. Volumetric shrinkage
COMMENT:
29
AIM:
Determination of undrained shear strength of a purely cohesive soil
specimen in the laboratory.
APPARATUS:
Laboratory vane shear apparatus, container for soft clay sample, helical spring
of known spring constant to give torque, shear vane of length 24mm and diameter
12mm.
DESCRIPTION:
A shear vane consists of four blades welded together at right angles to each
other and attached to a central shaft. The apparatus is either hand operated or motor
operated. The vanes are lowered or raised by an operating wheel along a shaft fixed at
the base of the apparatus. The soil specimen of soft consistency is placed in the
container and it is clamped to the base. The vane is rotated at a uniform rotation of 6 0
per minute manually or electrically after lowering the vane into the soil specimen.
Four torque springs are provided with spring constants of 2,4,6and 8 cm-kg to be used
in accordance with the consistency of the soil. By rotating the vane, the twist of the
rod is measured on a graduated disc through having a pointer.
PROCEDURE:
The soil specimen is mixed with a moisture content corresponding to the
consistency of plastic limit. The soil paste is kneaded into the container and placed at
the base of the apparatus and clamped. The vane is lowered into the specimen slowly
so that the top of the vane is at least 10mm below the top of the specimen. The initial
reading on the graduated disc is noted. The vane is rotated at a uniform rate of 60 per
minute by operating the torque handle until the specimen fails. Note the final reading
30
of the torque indicator. From the difference in the initial and the final reading, torque
is calculated. Perform the experiment with different moisture contents.
OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS:
Where
T/[D H/2+ D /6 ]
=
=
=
=
T
D
H
S.
No
Spring
constant
Kg-cm
RESULT:
COMMENT:
Torque
indicator
Reading
Initial
Final
Twist
angle
in
degrees
Twist
angle
in
radians
Torque
(T)
Kg-cm
Shear
stress
()
kg/cm2
Water
content
w%