Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
School/District:

Mr. Paulo Magandangbuhay

Principal
June, 2014-March, 2015
San Pablo ES, Dauis District

To be filled in during planning

MFOs
KRAs
Objectives

Delivery
of Basic
Educatio
n
Services

1. Instruction
al
Leadershi
p

2. Learning
Environme
nt

Accounted
for learning
outcomes of
schools viza-viz goals
and targets

Provided
safe and
child

Name of Rater/s:
Mrs. Paula Mahumot & Mr. Pedro Mahimsog
Position:
PSDS & Coordinating Principal
Date of Review:
November, 2014/April, 2015

Timeline

June, 2014March, 2015

June, 2014March, 2015

Weight
per KRA

25%

15%

Performance
Indicators
(Quality,
Efficiency,
Timeliness)

To be filled in during evaluation

Actual Result
Rating
Score

Increased
Increased
school
school
performance
performanc
by 2% at the
e by 2%
end of the sy
GSA
is GSA is
attained by
attained
by
75% and
75%
and
above
above (ELEM)
(ELEM)
100%
and
90%
accompli
above
shments
accomplishm

1.25

+
5
10
10/2=5
5x.25(weight
of KRA)=1.25

4
4x.15(weight
of KRA)=0.60

0.60

friendly
learning
and school
environme
nt for
students/le
arners

ents on the
following
(supported
by evidence
such
as
school policy,
reports,
information
materials,
advocacy
activities,
regular
meetings,
inventory)
-Adhered
to
Child-Friendly
environment
standards and
Programs
Institutionalize
d
child
protection

mechanisms
and processes
(per
Deped
Order 40, s.
2012)
-Provided
ICT
facilities/works
hop rooms as
learning
support
systems
-Has
clear
DRRM
mobilization
plans
3. Human
Resource
Managem
ent and
Developm
ent

Provided
technical
assistance
to
teachers
and to
non-

June,
2014March,
2015

20%

Provided 90%
of
technical
teachers
assistance
provided
to all
with
teachers
technical
on
assistance
matters
with

0.90

teaching
personnel
within the
RPMS
cycle

pertaining
to
enhancem
ent of
classroom
managem
ent, skills
and
instructio
nal
competen
ce within
the RPMS
cycle with
the
following
correspon
ding
evidences
:
-teacher
portfolio
containing
observatio
n reports,
developm
ental

complete
evidences.

Provided
technical
assistanc
e to all
nonteaching
personn
el for
support
services
within
the
RPMS
with
complete
cycle
with

needs
interventi
on results,
performan
ce
analysis
and
recomme
ndations
for
developm
ent
interventi
ons.

Provided
technical
assistance
to nonteaching

5
9

4. Parents
Involveme
nt and
Communit
y
Partnershi
p

Establishe
d school
and family
and
communit
y
partnershi

15%

personnel
for
support
services
within the
RPMS
cycle with
the
following
evidences
:
-performa
nce
contracts,
and
performan
ce
evaluation
results in
prescribed
tools.
Has
stakehold
ers
partnershi
p/mobiliza
tion plan

Provided
technical
assistanc
e to all
nonteaching
personn
el for
support
services
with
complete
evidence
s.

-Mobilization
plan complete
with reports
and
documentatio
ns of
meetings/agr

9/2=4.5
4.5X.20(w
eight of
KRA)=0.9
0

0.71

p for
performan
ce

(complete
with
reports
and
document
ations of
meetings,
agreemen
ts)

eements

-Organized 3
programs with
stakeholders,
esp. parents
for academic
and other
purposes

Organized 4
programs
with
stakeholders,
esp. parents
for academic
and other
purposes
(esp.
Obtained
Strategic
resources
planning)
for the
school
through
Obtained
stakeholder
resources for

5
14
14/3=4.7
4.7x.15(weig
ht of
KRA)=0.71

the school
through
stakeholders
partnership

5. School
Leadershi
pManage
ment and
Operation
s

Performed databased strategic

planning

Produced
a school
strategic
plan/SIP
and AIP
through
the
strategic
planning
process:
conduct
of school
situational
analysis,

25%

Produced
a school
strategic
plan/SIP
and AIP
through
the
strategic
planning
process,
approved
and
accepted
by the
SDS

s
partnership
with
complete
records/doc
uments of
its
utilization,
liquidation.
Produced
a school
strategic
plan/SIP
and AIP
through
the
strategic
planning
process
for
submissi
on to
DAC.

3
3X.25(weight
of KRA)=0.75

0.75

SWOT,
determini
ng
strategies
through
prioritizin
g
strategic
options,
resource
and
facilities
planning
and
formulatio
n of PAPs
based of
analyses
-Strategic
Plan was
based on
Deped vision,
contextualize
d in school

vision and
mission
-all school
stakeholders
were
engaged in
the strategic
planning
process
-M&E for
process and
outcomes
checkpoints
were
developed
and utilized
- 100% and
above
accomplishm
ent of school
targets (with
evidence

contained in
school report
card
4.21

Overall Rating for Accomplishments

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

PPPPPPP

dddddd
Rater

Ratee