Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David McGowan
Suzarf,tngram
uwRT tt02-026
03129t20ts
especially
Charlotte. Coffee shops market locally-roasted, fair-trade coffee; restaurants list the sources for
their meat products, alongside higher prices. Changes in culture and food preferences are driving
this local food movement. Although many Americans continue to follow eating habits adopted by
a prior generation
a courter movement is
spreading in the United States. Young adults with higher expendable incomes are putting their
dollars towards organic, locally-sourced, minimally-processed food. This paper explores the trend
and what drives
it.
{lrt
u ! TrwJ
)rqyD
Sttvaks qr\^/v
dv
-e/),0 au,q.
For decades America has led the way when it comes to heavily processed foods, for two
two primary reasons. First, "Americans like things that are fast and easy, requiring minimal
personaloreconomicsacrifice,,(lkerd*W1@odCulture,,).Thishasbeenthemain
selling point for the factory-to-table foods produced
in the United
decades. Corporations have engineered their products to have near-addictive tastes, improved
mouth-feels, enhanced appearances, and longer shelf lives. This was achieved by pumping foods
full of salt, fat, and corn extracts in a bid to hook the consumer. Corporations had little regard for
the nutritional value of their products.
The 2013 New York Times article The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Foodby
Michael Moss publicizes engineering foods to appeal to consumers. The article opens with a
discussion of James Behnke. Behnke is a scientist and former Pillsbury executive. He describes a
meeting of top food industry scientists and executives to discuss the food industry's concern over
"Gogurt" for kids-reminded the group that consumers like what tastes gooa(
and
or
for us in
the
- h-trw -
Moss then discusses the science companies use to "get people hooked on foods that are
convenient and inexpel5ivs"-665ugtry, salty, fatty foods [that] are not good
quantities that we consume them." (Moss, "The Extraordinary Science Of Addictive Junk Food").
t
c$
taste, packaging, and color and testing the combinations on consumers to find the match that
sell the most product. Moskowitz seeks to find the consumer "bliss point"
there's just enough sugar or salt
it
-r, ,. r"#3.
tflfrtf:-Y#j
,,flf
will
in heart disease
and,
Type 2
diabetes. Obesity is now at epidemic levels in the United States, where children are now three
times more likely to be overweight or obese than the American youth a decade ago (Russo and
-Smith
---
1). This is a direct result of the consumption of foods that are high-fat -*=--_
and low in
nutritional value. Many of these foods are developed and produced using corn and soy extracts.
While corn or soy products are not necessarily harmful to our bodies, the sheer volume of these
ingredients when considering our entire consumption
of food is alarming/
A 2011 leading
United States govemment health campaign advised Americans to "cut back on foods high in solid
pc,r*6)
fats, added sugars, and salt. They include cakes, cookies, ice cream, candies, sweetened drinks,
pizza,and fatty meats like ribs, sausages, bacon, and hot dogs" (choosemyplate.gov).'*
H,Stl"t-
However, at the same time, the United States govemment has heavily subsidized corn and
soy production in the United States since the mid-1990s. The production of corn sweeten...,
starch, and soy oils have cost American taxpayers as much as $19.2 billion
in subsidies
l"V
.o*$#tft
'at.o
since N
1995 (Russo and Smith 5). This $19.2 billion figure is even more staggering considering that
does not include the additional amount the U.S. government has paid to keep corn
it
feed-for large
meat production facilities--cheap. (Russo and Smith 2). This is a colossal figure when compared
to the $689 million spent on the apple production subsidies over the past 18 years (Russo and
Smith 5). Such startling figures help to explain why "a growing number of Americans
are
expressing doubts and outright dissatisfaction with the current American food system" (Ikerd,
"The New American Food Culture"). At the same time, these subsidies in part explain why
processed food remains cheaper in many cases than healthier options.
"local food" is shorthand for a number of things. It can mean sustainably produced food, whole
food
i.e. less processed food, and, of course, food sourced from local farms (and even within
to.ut)Cl&))
The growth of the local food movement can be seen in the Charlotte area. This is evident
through the growing number of farmer's markets, high quality supermarkets (Whole Foods),
community-supported agriculture (CSA's), and organic restaurants throughout the area. With the
addition of Johnson & Wales culinary school in2004, the food "scene" has been slowly gaining
momentum. As Kristie Greco, communications director for the Democratic National Convention
Committee, stated in the 2012 Nbw York Times articte)Cft arlotte Wokes tJp Bankers' Taste
lh-l,t'ts
tt //
<
Buds," "Like mushrooms springing to life after a forest fire, it seems a serious food scene
has
emerged in Charlotte in the recovery from the economic crisis" (Severson, "Charlotte Wakes tlp
Bankers' Taste Buds"). The new food scene perhaps explains (in part) why the 2012Democratic
National Convention was held in Charlotte.
tLIn,
The article goes on to explain some of the rationale behind the movement. Charlotte was
best known as a oomoneymaking mecc4l2and the food industry played on that for many years,
II
offering high-end chain steakhouses and barbecue for the financial elite. However, in the wake
&
of
"[F]armers and cooks found each other, and the whole town just seemed to be interested in
tg 'or Po'tu
.
expanding how it ate" (Severso\, '
For example,
+)
& Wales)
on what is available that week, that day, that hour" (Choiniere 22). In addition, Barlowe sources
his ingredients, his cooking tools, and even the decorations for the restaurant from North
farms andbusinesses
Carolina
(Choiniere22).
The energy behind Charlotte's local food movement is akin to that of the national
movement. The growing exposure
n0t
0rt-1$
food J:5-^tt'{,'
""U
Dqt:
producers have over the market and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a one of the
Oh0J\ry
food ethic. The work of author and food activist WdY
'
Michael Pollan has made a huge impression on many Americans, both from his books such
'oThe Omnivore's Dilemma" and
"In
Defense
as W::
documentary Food, Inc. The movie opens by telling the viewer that the food industry has
changed more in the last 50 years than in the previous 10,000 years. In particular, the rise of fast
food
produced as
if on an assembly line -
'
Young adults today are using their increased spending power and choosing "fast-casual"
healthy options. Young adults are tuming away from typical fast-food choices in recent years.
Instead, these individuals
many of whom are willing and able to pay a'opremium" for healthier
and seemingly more wholesome choices, are choosing such "fast-casual" options as Chipotle,
Panera, and Subway. These chains
have exploded in recent years, while traditional, low-priced fast food chains
have remained stagnant
like McDonald's
fast food chains attempt to incorporate "healthy" options (apple slices at McDonald's, for
example) shows that they are attempting to capture a segment of the more health-conscious
market.
Another reason for the local food movement is that the public has more knowledge about
mass food production tactics. The publication of documentaries like Food Inc. has heightened
the public's knowledge of the production practices used in the production of their food
including terrible conditions for animals and near-abuse of employees, many of whom are illegal
a more
New trends in the food and drink communities have put an emphasis on local ingredients,
as seen by the increase in the number of farmer's markets and the rapid increase
in coffee shops,
restaurants, and breweries that offer locally roasted coffee beans, local meat and produce, and
breweries claiming to use local ingredients. The buzzwords attached to the local food movement
have become, in some instances, m'ainstream
trade" products. Many of these buzzwords have become synonymous with health. For example,
the "gluten-free" movement has been the biggest trendsetter in recent years in the food industry,
gaining popularity from celebrities touting the benefits of eating a gluten-free diet. lnThe Wall
Street Journal article "The Gluten Free Craze: Is it healthy?," Margo Wootan, director
of
nutrition policy at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, explains how a decade ago a
gluten-free diei would have helped an individual to lose weight by cutting out breads, cakes, and
muffins. However, her article explains that the "gluten-free fad has actually undermined people's
health because now there are gluten-free varieties of all that junk food. Whether your doughnut is
gluten-free or not, it's still a doughnut" (Jargon, "The Gluten-Free Craze: Is It Healthy? ").
Under Wootan's logic, one might also ask whether the "hip" local food buzzwords have become
code words for "health food," when that might not actually be the case (for example, a locallysourced doughnut is still a doughnut). Likewise, one might ask whether large food production
companies are now using thebuzzwords to sugarcoat (no pun intended) their not-so-changed
"
P#
products. For example, NPR recently noted that Frito-Lay has reformulated Cheetos to meet
school nutrition guidelines. (NPR, "Guess What Makes the Cut as a 'Smart' Snack in Schools?
\\ VJM k
J_r
There is no single answer to what is driving the local food movement. Indeed
the
ftt/Ld
movement's momentum is heavily driven by increased publicity of the effects of the typical
American diet combined with the exposure of mass food production practices. Another
supporting factor is the increased availability of healthier organic foods and a market interested in
purchasing those local products. However, the success of the local food movement depends on
the public's continued support and food companies'
***r",*),,
lrYd;
'l