Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, bCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and cDepartment of
Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; dClinical Immunology and eBiomarker,
Centocor Research and Development, Malvern, Pa; fDivision of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa;
g
Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Vitamin D deficiency is a potential risk factor for cardiometabolic disease. We investigated the
associations between vitamin D and dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis, a group at high risk for cardiovascular disease.
METHODS: Serum 25(OH)vitamin D and lipoprotein levels were measured at baseline in a random sample of
499 participants, ages 18-85 years, enrolled in a randomized trial of golimumab (GOlimumab Before Employing methotrexate as the First-line Option in the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis of Early onset or GO-BEFORE
Trial). Participants had rheumatoid arthritis with active disease, and were nave to methotrexate and biologic
therapies. Multivariable linear regression was performed to assess associations between vitamin D levels and
lipoprotein fractions. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of hyperlipidemia
and the metabolic syndrome in participants with vitamin D deficiency (20 ng/mL).
RESULTS: In multivariable linear regression, vitamin D levels (per 10 ng/mL) were associated inversely
with low-density lipoprotein (: 0.029 [0.049, 0.0091], P .004) and triglyceride (: 0.094
[0.15, 0.039] P .001) levels, adjusted for demographic, cardiovascular, and disease-specific variables. Vitamin D and high-density lipoprotein levels were not associated in univariate or multivariate
analyses. Vitamin D deficiency was associated independently with an increased odds of hyperlipidemia
(odds ratio 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.45; P .014) and metabolic syndrome (odds ratio 3.45;
95% confidence interval, 1.75-6.80; P .001) in adjusted models.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, vitamin D deficiency was associated with the metabolic syndrome and
dyslipidemia in rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting a potential role in cardiovascular disease risk. Large-scale,
prospective studies are needed to determine if vitamin D supplementation improves lipoprotein levels and
reduces cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis.
2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2012) 125,
1036.e9-1036.e15
KEYWORDS: Lipoproteins; Metabolic syndrome; Rheumatoid arthritis; Triglycerides; Vitamin D
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest: None. Gary Toedter and Daniel Baker are employees of Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a direct role in
writing the manuscript.
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Joshua F. Baker, MD,
MSCE, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of
the University of Pennsylvania, 8 Penn Tower Building, One Convention
Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
E-mail address: bakerjo@uphs.upenn.edu
0002-9343/$ -see front matter 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.01.025
1036.e10
Baker et al
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using Stata version 11 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex). The association between
vitamin D levels and continuous variables were assessed
using Spearmans rank (for skewed correlations). Mean and
median lipoprotein levels were tested for equality across
categorical variables using t-tests (or rank-sum tests for
nonparametric data) and analysis of variance.
A primary goal of this study was to evaluate the associations between vitamin D level (as a continuous and categorical variable) and baseline lipoprotein and TG levels
using multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis.
In initial multivariable linear regression analysis, LDL, TG,
HDL, and vitamin D levels were evaluated as continuous
natural log-transformed variables. Possible confounding
cardiovascular and disease-specific covariables were considered in development of the model as described. Confounding was considered present if the strength of association changed by more than 15% when the variable of
interest was included in the model.23 Multivariable logistic
regression models using categorical variables for the association between vitamin D deficiency (20 ng/mL) and the
presence of hyperlipidemia and presence of metabolic syndrome were used to facilitate clinical interpretation of the
study findings. Ordinal logistic regression also was used to
evaluate the association of vitamin D deficiency and the
number of components of the metabolic syndrome (1, 2, 3,
and 4-5). Goodness of fit for regression models was evaluated using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models and by graphing residuals and
using Wilk tests for linear regression models. The Brant test
was used to test the proportional odds assumption in the
ordinal regression models.
RESULTS
Baseline Characteristics of Participants
Subject characteristics at enrollment are summarized in Table 1 in the entire sample and according to vitamin D
1036.e11
1036.e12
Table 1
Baseline Variables
All Participants
Vitamin D 20 ng/mL
Vitamin D 20 ng/mL
P Value
n (%)
Age (years)
Race
Asian, n (%)
White, n (%)
Black, n (%)
Other, n (%)
Sex, male, n (%)
BMI (kg/m2)
GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)
Winter measurement, n (%)
Diabetes, n (%)
Hypertension, n (%)
Metabolic syndrome, n (%)
Smoking, past/current, n (%)
Regular exercise, n (%)
Steroid use, n (%)
Lipid-lowering therapy, n (%)
Laboratory studies
Serum albumin (g/dL)
Low-density lipoprotein
Triglycerides
High-density lipoprotein
Disease-specific measures
DAS28 Score ESR
ESR (mm/h)
CRP (mg/dL)
HAQ score
Evaluator assessment
Pain on VAS
Erosion score
Joint space narrowing
Van der Heidje-Sharp
score
CCP positive, n (%)
Disease duration (years)
499 (100)
49.5 12.4
259 (52)
47.7 11.8
240 (48)
51.5 12.6
N/A
.001
.05
92 (18)
367 (74)
6 (1)
34 (7)
83 (17)
27.2 6.0
89.3 21.5
219 (45)
25 (5)
135 (27)
53 (11)
169 (34)
69 (14)
268 (54)
31 (6)
44 (17)
195 (75)
1 (0.4)
19 (7)
54 (21)
26.5 5.98
88.0 20.7
111 (44)
8 (3)
61 (23)
16 (6)
92 (36)
41 (16)
140 (54)
13 (5)
48 (20)
172 (72)
5 (2)
15 (6)
29 (12)
27.9 5.99
90.8 22.2
108 (46)
17 (7)
74 (31)
37 (15)
77 (32)
28 (12)
128 (53)
18 (8)
.01
.01
.1
.7
.05
.07
.01
.4
.2
.9
.2
4.2 0.4
108 (88-130)
107 (82-151)
57 (48-67)
4.2 0.4
104 (84-126)
103 (79-139)
56 (46-67)
4.2 0.4
111 (94-137)
116 (85-171)
58 (47-67)
.8
.001
.01
.5
6.30
38
1.3
1.56
6.2
6.65
4.5
1
6
6.24
40
1.2
1.49
6.3
6.55
4.5
1
6
6.37
38
1.45
1.62
6.1
6.7
4.5
1
6
.2
.5
.4
.05
.3
.07
.7
.8
.8
(1.15)
(28-60)
(0.5-3.4)
(0.66)
(5.1-7.4)
(5.1-8)
(1.5-12.5)
(0-7)
(2-21.5)
373 (75)
1.2 (0.5-4.2)
(1.24)
(25-62)
(0.5-3.5)
(0.68)
(5.1-7.6)
(4.9-7.8)
(1.5-12.5)
(0-7.8)
(2-21)
200 (77)
1.1 (0.5-4)
(1.04)
(29-60)
(0.5-3.35)
(0.63)
(5.1-7.3)
(5.2-8.2)
(2-12.5)
(0-6.5)
(2-21.75)
172 (72)
1.4 (0.55-4.55)
.2
.2
Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables are presented as %. The P value represents
the comparison between vitamin D deficiency categories.
BMI body mass index; CCP cyclic citrullinated peptide; CRP C-reactive protein; DAS28 disease activity score 28; ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GFR glomerular filtration rate; HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire; VAS visual analog scale.
DISCUSSION
These data demonstrate that vitamin D deficiency was associated with higher LDL and TG levels and greater odds of
Baker et al
1036.e13
Coefficient
95% CI
0.084
0.31
0.080
0.26
0.091
0.28
0.093
0.28
P Value
CI confidence
interval;
LDL low-density
lipoprotein;
TG triglycerides.
*Adjusted for age, sex, race.
Adjusted for age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes,
hypertension, and smoking status.
Adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, smoking,
glomerular filtration rate (GFR), exercise, and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, GFR, exercise, smoking, diabetes,
hypertension, CRP, geographic region, disease activity (DAS28), steroid
use, and season of measurement.
Odds Ratio
95% CI
P Value
D 20 ng/mL
1.63
1.14-2.35
.008
D 20 ng/mL
1.51
1.03-2.21
.033
D 20 ng/mL
1.62
1.10-2.39
.015
D 20 ng/mL
1.64
1.10-2.45
.015
CI confidence interval.
*Adjusted for age, sex, race.
Adjusted for age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes,
hypertension, and smoking status.
Adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, glomerular filtration rate (GFR),
exercise, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, GFR, exercise, smoking, steroid use
at baseline, diabetes, hypertension, CRP, geographic region, disease
activity (DAS28), and season of measurement.
1036.e14
Vitamin D Quartile*
Odds Ratio
95% CI
P Value
References
28.2 ng/mL
20.8-28.2 ng/mL
14.5-20.7 ng/mL
14.5 ng/mL
1
2.66
5.40
7.59
0.77-9.20
1.67-17.45
2.37-24.30
.12
.005
.001
1. Judd SE, Tangpricha V. Vitamin D deficiency and risk for cardiovascular disease. Am J Med Sci. 2009;338(1):40-44.
2. Tare M, Emmett SJ, Coleman HA, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency is
associated with impaired vascular endothelial and smooth muscle function
and hypertension in young rats. J Physiol. 2011;589:4777-4786.
3. Pinelli NR, Jaber LA, Brown MB, Herman WH. Serum 25-hydroxy
vitamin d and insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and glucose intolerance among Arab Americans. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1373-1375.
4. Brenner DR, Arora P, Garcia-Bailo B, et al. Plasma vitamin D levels
and risk of metabolic syndrome in Canadians. Clin Invest Med. 2011;
34(6):E377.
5. Ganji V, Zhang X, Shaikh N, Tangpricha V. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with prevalence of metabolic
syndrome and various cardiometabolic risk factors in US children and
adolescents based on assay-adjusted serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data
from NHANES 2001-2006. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):225-233.
6. Rizzo M, Spinas GA, Cesur M, et al. Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype and LDL size and subclasses in drug-naive patients with early
rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207(2):502-506.
7. Crowson CS, Myasoedova E, Davis JM 3rd, et al. Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome associated with rheumatoid arthritis in
patients without clinical cardiovascular disease. J Rheumatol. 2011;
38(1):29-35.
8. Tanasescu C, Jurcut C, Jurcut R, Ginghina C. Vascular disease in
rheumatoid arthritis: from subclinical lesions to cardiovascular risk.
Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(4):348-354.
9. Kiran G, Debashish D. Vitamin D and rheumatoid arthritis: is there a
link? Int J Rheum Dis. 2008;11:206-211.
10. Kremer J, Ritchlin C, Mendelsohn A, et al. Golimumab, a new human
anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered intravenously
in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: forty-eight-week efficacy
and safety results of a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(4):917-928.
11. Binkley N, Krueger D, Cowgill CS, et al. Assay variation confounds
the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(7):3152-3157.
12. Hollis B. Quantitation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D by radioimmunoassay using radioiodinated tracers. Methods
Enzymol. 1997;282:174-186.
13. Hollis BW, Horst RL. The assessment of circulating 25(OH)D and
1,25(OH)2D: where we are and where we are going. J Steroid Biochem
Mol Biol. 2007;103(3-5):473-476.
14. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, et al. The 2011 report on dietary
reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of
Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2011;96(1):53-58.
15. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):
266-281.
16. Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and risk
of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008;117(4):503-511.
17. Binkley N, Krueger D, Lensmeyer G. 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement, 2009: a review for clinicians. J Clin Densitom. 2009;
12(4):417-427.
18. Adorini L, Penna G. Control of autoimmune diseases by the vitamin D
endocrine system. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4(8):404-412.
19. Wilson PWF, DAgostino RB, Levy D, et al. Prediction of coronary
heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:
1837-1847.
20. Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, et al. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(20):2292-2333.
CI confidence interval.
*Adjusted for age, sex, race, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), region,
disease activity (DAS28), smoking, exercise, steroid use at baseline,
C-reactive protein, and season of measurement.
marker of visceral fat content. Additionally, fatty liver disease is associated with low vitamin D levels, suggesting that
greater hepatic fat content might impair hepatic 25-hydroxylation of vitamin D.33 Furthermore, vitamin D-binding
protein, a member of the albumin gene family that transports vitamin D to target tissues, along with 25(OH) vitamin
D3 itself, has been identified in very low-density lipoprotein
particles.36 Thus, it is not known if measurement of vitamin
D is affected by the presence of lipoprotein particles. Further study is necessary to clarify the nature of this association in rheumatoid arthritis.
Strengths of this study include the large sample size,
standardized measures of disease characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, confounding variables, and comprehensive assessment of lipoprotein and vitamin D levels. The
primary limitation of this study is the observational and
cross-sectional design, which may be subject to residual
confounding and prevents assessment of temporal associations. Randomized clinical studies are essential to establish
these associations. An additional limitation is the lack of
data on dietary intake. Subjects with poor dietary habits
might be more likely to have both elevated lipoproteins and
low vitamin D levels. However, the association was independent of albumin, a measure of nutritional status. The
findings also were independent of geographic region; therefore, they are not likely explained by regional variation in
dietary habits. A third limitation is that the study population
was predominantly female (congruent with the demographics of the disease), and there were too few men to stratify the
results by sex. Our study did not include measures of waist
circumference, and the use of BMI as a surrogate measure
may have resulted in misclassification of the number of
components of the metabolic syndrome. However, the
strength and consistency of the associations between vitamin D status, the presence of metabolic syndrome, and the
number of components of the metabolic syndrome suggests
that the lack of waist circumference data was not an important limitation.
In conclusion, low 25(OH) vitamin D was associated with
increased odds of elevated LDL and TG as well as metabolic
syndrome at baseline in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis
independent of numerous potential confounders. These find-
Baker et al
1036.e15