Fun Ways to Solve CA's

Power Problems
Or
Giving Fossil Fuels Back to
the Dinosaurs
Using non-patentable working solutions for a cleaner, greener, more energy plentiful California
All Rights Reserved, April 2015, Bill Mundy

Points of Need
Unplanned expansion of power needs due to new industry or
community expansion beyond the capacity of allocated power
plants
Unplanned or contrary performance of planned expansion at
critical power plants due to regulatory or system failures
Uncontrolled rate increases in cost of power due to gas or fossil fuel
cost increases or unrealized predicted cost improvements with
newer technologies.

Obsolete or worn out power plants failing to meet the needs of

existing and new customers in their allocated grid areas
Nuclear waste and increasing loss of faith that nuclear wastes are
safely stored at power plants no longer operating or operating on
major fault lines. No credible long term recycling program.

What is going on with CA's power grid

today
Increasingly being responsive to the needs of the changing demographics of
California is impossible with the current process and structure. Increased
demands not only come from population growth, but now the IOT explosion
promises to guarantee every prediction made to date will be insufficient.
The need for power easily can exceed the ability to provide new power with
limited locations for power generating plants, extensive occupation of valuable
land and corridors required for the grid structure. Plus training, staffing,
managing the aging infrastructure as well as expanding it considering the
conflicts in public interest and safety.
The cost of that power can be equally impossible to predict. Although some
appearance of control through trade agreements may be managing the costs
short term, competing demands, natural disasters, unforeseen public backlash
can all completely lay the best contracts and plans to waste.
Increasingly today the cost of power is seen as the single most limiting factor to
economic stability and real growth.

The Four Fun (and effective) Steps to

Meeting Future Needs for Power
Power Amplification

Creating Green Generating Solutions on Premise

Implementing Self-Powered Generators
Efficient Conversion of Fuel to Energy to Clean the
Environment

Power Amplification
Purpose and best fit
When power is available, but insufficient for the local needs, the most economical
approach to increase power in the short term would be to install modified transformers
that multiply the power output.

Technology Principle
The principle behind a transformer is to use the changing electric field in an inductor to
create and amplify a changing magnetic field in a permeable core. This amplified
changing magnetic field then creates an amplified electric field in a "pick-up" inductor.
Common implementation of this effect is then to force the resulting changing magnetic
field (amplified) created by the pick-up inductor back to the inspiring inductor. If instead
the amplified magnetic field is shunted to a third false-load inductor, no significant
power is drained from the inspired inductor. No additional demand is placed on the
existing power grid. The output power from the pickup core is a high multiple of the
original inspiring power source. (Non-optimal designs have demonstrated 4x increases.)

Action Plan
Install end of line amplifying transformers at the facilities or local substations where
additional power needs are consistently exceeding capacity. Or install the power
multipliers where they make the most economical sense, possibly even at the generating
sites.

Creating Green Solutions On Site

The next set of solutions could be provided with DOE oversight on a leased
basis. Fuels could be provided or in the case of no fuel or common
substances that do not cost, or are specific to the location, the user could
be tasked to provide the fuel as part of the lease.
The solutions are all non-polluting and vary in noise level from completely
silent to the noise of an internal combustion engine which could be
enclosed and muffled. They can be installed on customer premises or in
relatively small building sized structures or mobile transportable containers.
The advantage is they could be turned on and off on demand. They can
be added to the grid, or simply run independently as required by the
nature of the local demands (for a high capacity user like a server farm or a
blend of users like an industrial and residential local area). (AC or DC)
No increase in capacity of the grid delivery structure or maintenance need
be made to expand service beyond the existing infrastructure.

Multiple Green Solutions with Multiple Features

ROSCH AG has demonstrated and markets a practical system that makes power from a
standard 3 phase generator powered by a vertical carousel of inverted buckets in a water
tank. Water doubles it's pressure and buoyant effect with every foot of depth. Compressing
air to fill and float a chain of inverted buckets requires little energy to capitalize on the
leverage of a relatively thin column water tank. Providing green, low maintenance, proven
reliability power on a home by home, business specific, or block by block basis.

Paul Pantone and his licensees have demonstrated running generators that burn fossil fuels
can be converted to run those same fuels diluted 50% with water and completely convert the
fuel mix to energy without any exhaust. The engines also run cooler and last longer with less
wear. They can burn any vaporized substance as fuel, even toxic waste. The water can be
polluted. The exhaust has an option of being clean air, or no exhaust at all.
Multiple inventors have publicly shared using systems that electrically generate H2, O2, and
energized linear water can also be used to run generators with only water as exhaust.
Thane C Heins has demonstrated and applied for a patent, which cannot be awarded, that
increasing the capacitance of a standard inductor on a generator will delay the energy flow
from the pick-up inductor. This reverses the work associated with the back EMF of the pick-up
coil mechanically powering the generator with the amplified electricity generated rather
than forcing the motor driving it to work against this force. The result is electricity in excess of
the power it takes to turn the generator.

Efficient Conversion of Fuel (meaning

toxic wastes) to Energy
California is currently hosting millions of pounds of radioactive materials which will remain a
safety and toxic threat for thousands of years.
Other industries continually produce toxic wastes that require expensive treatment or
storage.
All of these materials could be used to generate heat to drive steam turbines in existing
facilities with these types of generators.
The industries with the toxic wastes would pay California to dispose of their problem, which
would produce power for those same industries or consumers. Clean energy would
actually mean energy that comes from cleaning the environment.
The process would be to produce linear, energized water and use it as a catalyst to power
the nuclear breakdown of the waste into other non-toxic substances (potentially
substances that could be sold for a profit) or completely converted into energy. This
process has been demonstrated for decades by multiple developers.

The function of a nuclear reactor would change from actually being a nuclear polluter to
becoming a nuclear cleaner. It would be ironic if California actually repurposed it's present
operating nuclear power plant to eliminate nuclear waste.

The Fun Future of Electric Power in

California
Implementing any of these new solutions could bring the power to the local market
without the overhead of expanding the grid or grid management. The expansions could
be locally managed by the users or remotely managed via the internet.
Adding power multiplying transformers would minimize the size of generators for any
installation. The concept of large scale power plants and expanding the control,
maintenance, or physical structure of the grid is obsolete.
The existing grid itself could be cannibalized for parts and raw materials providing a
positive cash flow. The grid would be replaced by a virtual grid network of independent
power plants. Toxic substances could be disposed of in the power facilities designed to
eliminate waste.
Investing in the reliable development of these technologies would place California
Department of Energy in a leadership and money making position of training and
building power systems for the world. (A partnership with China would help our air quality
too.) If California had the presence to deepen the research regarding these
technologies, huge profits could be made spawning new industries in producing clean
water, matter transmutation, plasma science, and new applications based on the clean
high density energy source that is within linear water.