Pierre 1

Briana Pierre
Prof. Leslie Wolcott
ENC 1102
18 March 2015
Annotated Bibliography
The broad-range of nursing is a continuously evolving profession in which innovations
are constantly brought into play in order to accommodate the increasingly complex healthcare
system. In this dynamic field, it is prevalent for nurse educators to analyze and modify education
curriculum, proposals, and programs that is vital to new and current practicing nurses. With
regard to advanced practicing nurses (APN) who are nurses who have at least have obtained a
masters degree in nursing, recent studies have put an emphasizes on a new innovation related to
the credentials of advanced nursing practice. This innovation which has sparked a decade-long
conversation brought to attention by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN)
when it adopted a proposal to move the education and required credentials of APNs from the
masters degree to the doctoral level by the year 2015.
To further understand the driving force behind the AACNs position on the potential
implementation on a required doctoral degree for current and future APNs, this annotated
bibliography attempts to address both negative and positive viewpoints on this controversial
debate on the proposed doctoral level education requirement to pursue a career in advanced

Pierre 1

practice nursing. The list of sources below provides many different perspective on this longlasting matter and is formulated from scholarly/academic journals. This issue sparks an interest
to future nurses, current advanced practicing nurses, nursing education programs, and the overall
doctoral education program in general because this debatable subject has direct effects, whether
positive or negative on those who are most involved and no not pertain to those who do not wish
to purse or have an interest in the nursing profession. The professions of the contributing authors
to the academic journals in this field ranged from nurses who have gained credentials beyond the
post-graduate level in nursing to researchers who are experts in nursing informatics.
In this annotated bibliography, researchers, current and future advanced practice nursing
students, nurse education programs, and nurse educators will be made knowledgeable of the new
innovations that has the nursing community buzzing and the effects it has on the growing health
care industry.

Apold, S. (2008). The doctor of nursing practice: looking back, moving forward. Journal For
Nurse Practitioners, 4(2), 101-108.
In this scholarly journal article, Susan Apold, vice president of academic affairs and dean
of faculty at College of Mount Saint Vincent in Bronx, NY and also the immediate past
president of the American College of Nurse Practitioners seeks to discuss the long-lasting
conversation and conclusion on the adaptation of the doctor of nursing practice as the
required credential for the advanced nursing practice profession. This article unfolds the
origin behind doctoral education, provides an explanation of the challenges and beneficial
aspects of a new doctoral degree for the advanced practice nursing education, and lastly,
suggest ways on moving forward in relation to the growing healthcare system. Opponents

Pierre 1

of the potential DNP practice credential argue that if this new requirement is in-fact
implemented, it may prevent nursing faculty from having tenure which will enable them
from participating in policy issues, decision-making on the college/university level,
budget distributions, and other inquires that focuses on the overall growth, development,
and actually sustainability of nursing as a discipline in higher education. Contrary to the
challenges this new development may face, there are also some advantages to this process
in which researchers argue that the DNP practice degree may increase knowledge to
improve the practice of nursing, leadership roles, and develop improvements in patientoutcomes.

Boland, B., Treston, J., & O'Sullivan, A. (2010). Climb to new educational heights. Nurse
Practitioner, 35(4), 36-41.
In this scholarly article, the authors who all have the necessary post-masters level
credentials in nursing seek to explain the dynamics of the doctoral level of advanced
nursing practices and informs future nurses who wish to practice in this particular level
on what to look for and what to be aware of when pursing the complexity of the doctoral
education program. The authors discuss potential of this innovation and argue that this
proposal can significantly influence the evolution of advanced nursing practice and has
an impact on current and future nurse practitioners. Much like most of the sources listed,
this article explains the informatics behind the doctoral program and analyzes the
implications it will have to undermine in the future. In the article, the author informs
those that hope to pursue this potential innovation of the essentials of the doctoral

Pierre 1

education in advanced nursing practice. Emphasize is placed on examples of DNP

programs in the U.S. and what the institutions main focus and objectives

Brar, K., Boschma, G., & McCuaig, F. (2010). The development of nurse practitioner preparation
beyond the master's level: what is the debate about?. International Journal Of Nursing
Education Scholarship, 7(1), 15P.
The authors in this scholarly journal article who are all experts in the nursing profession
explains the overview of the DNP in the U.S. makes a comparison to the way it has a
direct influence on the DNP program in Canada. In both countries, Brar et al. establishes
that the driving need for the DNP program correlates to the shortage of nurses educated at
the doctoral level and argues that the program can bridge gap in knowledge between the
masters degree level and the PhD program. If this gap is not filled, researchers believe
that this can hinder the quality development of patient care. The debate in this article
focuses on using the doctoral program as an alternative to the PhD program in the states
and whether or not Canada should follow behind. The authors compare and contrast
between the DNP and the PhD in nursing. The PhD in nursing focuses on the research
and education aspect of nursing whereas the DNP concentrate more on the clinical
practices or clinical teachings. A major similarity between the two, the authors argues,
are that both programs is that both utilize content from research methods.

Pierre 1

Chase, S., & Pruitt, R. (2006). The practice doctorate: innovation or disruption?. Journal Of
Nursing Education, 45(5), 155-161.
The authors, Dr. Susan Chase who is an interim Assistant Dean for Doctoral Programs
and Associate Professor, Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing at Florida Atlantic
University and Dr. Rosanne Pruitt who is a Professor and Director at Clemson University
School of Nursing in Clemson, South Carolina describes the preparation of advanced
nursing practice with a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree as a disruptive
innovation. This scholarly article main objectives focuses entirely on the future
difficulties of this innovation in regards to future students, current practicing advanced
nurses, nursing colleges, and the overall education of a doctoral degree as a unit. The
American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) has proposed by the year 2015 that
all advanced practicing nurses be required to obtain a DNP degree as a credential,
however, the researchers in this article has set their own recommendations and opinions
in which they have proposed that the AACN entirely eliminate the 2015 deadline for the
innovation of a doctoral prepared nursing practice.

Chism, L. (2009). Toward clarification of the doctor of nursing practice degree. Advanced
Emergency Nursing Journal, 31(4), 287-297.
The author of this academic journal, Lisa Chiasm who is a DNP, APRN,BC, at the
Karmanos Cancer Institute in Michigan, much like the sources listed provides an
overview of the history of the doctoral education in nursing and sets out to inform those

Pierre 1

interesting in the field on the competencies of the DNP in nursing. As in the article by
Brar et al., Chiasm addresses the confusion between the DNP and PhD programs and
distinguishes the two. The author explains the role DNP graduates play in regard to
emergency nursing settings which includes research and leadership.

Dracup, K., Cronenwett, L., Meleis, A., & Benner, P. (2005). Reflections on the doctorate of
nursing practice. Nursing Outlook, 53(4), 177-182.
Kathleen Dracup is a Professor and Dean at the School of Nursing,
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Linda Cronenwett is a
Professor and Dean at the School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.; Afaf I. Meleis is a Professor and Margaret Bond Simon Dean at
the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.; Patricia E.
Benneris a Professor and Thelma Shobe Endowed Chair in Ethics and Spirituality at the
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. all seek address what they

believe are the potential consequences of adopting a practice doctorate within the
nursing profession in which they argue might be negative for the nursing profession, for
healthcare, and for society as a whole. The practice doctorate, in their professional

opinions threatens the number of nurses prepared at the PhD level and changes the
nature of university-based faculties of nursing.

Pierre 1

Draye, M., Acker, M., & Zimmer, P. (2006). The practice doctorate in nursing: approaches to
transform nurse practitioner education and practice. Nursing Outlook, 54(3), 123-129.
Mary Ann Draye is an Assistant Professor, Director of the Family Nurse Practitioner
Program, at the University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA.; Michele
Ackeris a Senior Lecturer, Director of the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Program at the
University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA.; Phyllis Arn Zimmer is a
Lecturer, Family Nurse Practitioner Program at the University of Washington School of
Nursing, Seattle, WA. All 3 authors of this scholarly journal article touches on how
turmoil in the healthcare system present renewed challenges to nursing. The authors
argue that these challenges may be good for the healthcare system in which gives the
opportunity to increase nursings capacity to provide leadership toward improving the
health status of the nation through the innovation practice doctorate. The authors also
provide suggestions on how the AACN can go by implementing this innovation, for
example, curricula need to be carefully crafted, and that education and practice play
hand-in-hand in identifying the practice doctorate as the way to accomplish these goals.

Fain, J., Asselin, M., & McCurry, M. (2008). The DNP... why now?. Nursing Management,
39(7), 34-37.
At the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, College of Nursing, James A. Fainis dean
and professor, and Marilyn Asselin and Mary McCurryare assistant professors all have
the necessary credential and are expertise in this field argues that the staffing shortage for

Pierre 1

healthcare professionals is well recognized and the need will continue to grow for
advanced practice nurses. The authors describes the roles and responsibilities of DNP
nurses, the main purpose as to why the program is implemented, and discusses the need
for requirement of the DNP as the established credential. They also explain the
educational preparation behind the program.
Fulton, J., & Lyon, B. (2005). The need for some sense making: doctor of nursing practice.
Online Journal Of Issues In Nursing, 10(3).
In this article based on the issues that surround the doctorate-level of nursing practice,
Fulton & Lyon who are Doctors in Nurse Practice (DNP) attempt to ascertain whether the
on-going proposal of implementing a practice doctorates would pose an arising concern
for the method of nurse practice. With an interest in the educational and economic effects
on students and employers as well as its significance on the overall focus of the practice
doctorate, the authors summarizes and reflects on the problematic implementation of the
practice of doctorate in nursing and proposes a more thorough debate involving all parties
before progressing further with this degree.
This is especially important in my discussion of including a doctorate degree in the
advancing roles of nurse practitioners because this article contributes to the on-going
debate of implementing such degree and seeks to emphasize the negative effects it has on
the ever-changing phenomenon of the healthcare system.
Hathaway, D., Jacob, S., Stegbauer, C., Thompson, C., & Graff, C. (2006). The practice
doctorate: perspectives of early adopters. Journal Of Nursing Education, 45(12), 487496.

Pierre 1

Dr. Hathaway is Dean, Dr. Jacob is Executive Associate Dean, Dr. Stegbauer is Associate
Dean, Dr. Thompson is Professor of Acute and Chronic Care, and Dr. Graff is Assistant
Professor of Primary and Public Health and Chief of Nursing at the Boling Center for
Developmental Disabilities, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Science
Center, Memphis, Tennessee. The emergence of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)
degree is being described as a disruptive innovation as mentioned in another source
that is altering the landscape of nursing and health care and creating a great deal of
controversy within and beyond the profession of nursing. This article proposes that the
DNP is not start of a recent controversy and that innovation begun in the late 1960s with
the advent of nurse practitioner programs. As expected with disruptive innovations, many
challenges face those who are early adopters and who forge ahead during the early phase
of innovation. As faculty and administrators of one of the early, second-generation DNP
programs, the authors are fully aware of ongoing discussion and issues related to the
practice doctorate. This article shares the experiences of this group of early adopters and
their insights into controversies surrounding the DNP movement
Kaplan, L., & Brown, M. (2009). Doctor of nursing practice program evaluation and beyond:
capturing the profession's transition to the DNP. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(6),
362-366.
Lenz, E. (2005). The Practice Doctorate in Nursing: an idea whose time has come. Online
Journal Of Issues In Nursing, 10(3)
In this article the practice and educational trends that led to the resurgence of interest in
the practice doctorate in nursing were reviewed. The characteristics of existing practice

Pierre 1

doctoral programs and differences between practice and research-focused programs were
explicated. Potential benefits of the degree for health care and for nursing education were
detailed. Several of the issues that were taken into account in the development of the
AACN position paper on the practice doctorate were described. These included the scope
of the degree, the recommendations regarding a core curricular structure and content
areas for inclusion, and the controversial decision to recommend that the DNP be
established as the degree for advanced nursing practice. If the excitement, interest and the
number of institutions moving forward to develop DNP programs are valid indicators,
then truly the practice-focused doctorate in nursing is an idea in which they argue, whose
time has arrived.
Mundinger, M., Cook, S., Lenz, E., Piacentini, K., Auerhahn, C., & Smith, J. (2000). Assuring
quality and access in advanced practice nursing: a challenge to nurse educators. Journal
Of Professional Nursing, 16(6), 322-329.
Primary care providers and a public seeking higher quality, cost-effective care, advanced
practice nurses will be measured not only by their comparative value in delivering
conventional primary care, but also by the uniqueness of their contributions to health
outcomes. These value-added skills, distinctive to nursing practice at all levels, include
health education, disease prevention, health promotion, community resource access, and
partnerships with patients. Government, private payors, and national and state regulators
all authorize increasingly independent practice by advanced practice nurses. When
advanced practice nurses assume such fully accountable primary care roles, their title and
certication should be distinctive to that level of practice. They argue that A Doctor of

Pierre 1

Nursing Practice (DNP) degree would signal to the public that nurses at their highest
practice competence are at the same level as other health professionals holding
doctorates.
O'Sullivan, A., Carter, M., Marion, L., Pohl, J., & Werner, K. (2005). Moving forward together:
the practice doctorate in nursing. Online Journal Of Issues In Nursing, 10(3).
In this article, the authors who are all experts in this field and who have obtained an PhD
in nursing shifts the focus of deciding if establishing the practice of a doctorate degree
would have an negative or positive outlook on the dynamics of nursing, but rather takes
an innovative approach that seeks to ensure the quality of nursing educational programs
as a whole. The authors put an emphasis on the changing educational system for nurses
that will accommodate the movement of an advanced and diverse healthcare system and
that will facilitate a more in-depth scope of practice for nurse practitioners. Nurse
practitioner primary objective focused on prevention of diseases and delivering quality
healthcare to a wide-range of people, but researchers are trying to slightly change this
aspect to include informatics, more knowledge, leadership, and a business outlook on the
demanding healthcare system as a unit. Integrating this newly implementation of a
doctorate degree and determining how to propel this phenomenon forward into
educational programs are what researchers are trying to establish as well.
This article is especially significant in my discussion of an implementation of a doctorate
degree into the practice of nurse practitioners because it shifts the focus of figuring out an
answer to the debate of whether or not this aspect holds a negative or positive effect on
the future of nurse practitioners, but researchers instead are far more interested in

Pierre 1

determining ways to include the practice doctorate into the quality of nursing educational
programs as well as look for ways in which these programs can move along with the
continuously and growing dynamics of the healthcare system.
Sperhac, A., & Clinton, P. (2008). Doctorate of nursing practice: blueprint for excellence.
Journal Of Pediatric Healthcare, 22(3), 146-151.
The DNP curriculum contains content on leadership, management, and other topics that
are needed to address some of the issues in the health care system that are not typically
included in most master of science in nursing curricula, as well as additional essential
content and nurse practitioner competencies. As pediatric nurse practitioners and other
advanced practice nurses go forward in their careers, the DNP may have an impact on
their role. In this article, the authors provide a background of the DNP movement,
changes in advanced practice nursing education, and the concerns of currently practicing
pediatric nurse practitioners prepared at the master's level will be addressed.
Swanson, M. L., & Stanton, M. P. (2013). Chief Nursing Officers' Perceptions of the Doctorate
of Nursing Practice Degree. Nursing Forum, 48(1), 35-44.
Wall, B., Novak, J., & Wilkerson, S. (2005). Doctor of Nursing Practice program development:
reengineering health care. Journal Of Nursing Education, 44(9), 396-403.
Dr. Wall is Assistant Professor and Interim Director of Graduate Studies in Nursing; Dr.
Novak is Professor, Associate Dean of the College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Health
Sciences, and Head of the School of Nursing; and Dr. Wilkerson is Associate Professor
and Director of Doctoral Program Development, Purdue University School of Nursing,

Pierre 1

West Lafayette, Indiana. They discuss in this article, the developmental process of a
Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program that uses resources to create unique DNP
curriculum opportunities. Other schools may benefit from this experience in the
development of their own DNP programs. The program delivers an innovative curriculum
frompostbaccalaureate to doctorate, emphasizing health care engineering and
interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty, hospitals, community leaders, and
policymakers. policy residency, and cognate residencies in an area of specialization. The
seven core competencies recommended by the American Association of Colleges of
Nursing are incorporated into the curriculum.

Webber, P. (2008). The Doctor of Nursing Practice degree and research: are we making an
epistemological mistake?. Journal Of Nursing Education, 47(10), 466-472.
Dr. Webber is Professor, Nursing, Shenandoah University, Winchester, Virginia d
discussion in the literature about whether Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) curricula
should prepare students to be principle investigators of research or whether this skill
should be left to other doctorally prepared nurses. Currently, nurse practitioners have to
rely on medical research to support their practice due to a lack of research and
researchers. Consequently, these practitioners run the risk of adopting practice values of
medicine rather than those unique to this specialty. Despite this risk, several national
organizations have recommended that DNP programs not prepare graduates to be
principle investigators. This decision poses several levels of concern, including failure to
analyze the adequacy of our current approach to research, the mixed messages presented

Pierre 1

in the position statements of these national organizations, and the effects of the looming
doctoral faculty shortage.