PERTANYAAN PEMBELAJARAN

1. Apa yang harus dimasukkan dalam

penilaian pasca perawatan setelah
pengobatan yang diberikan sebelumnya telah
selesai? Kapan dan seberapa sering pasien
diperiksa ulang? Berikan contoh variabel
yang memengaruhi frekuensi ini.

berbagai keterbatasan dari prostodontik yang

tetap sebelum pengobatan dimulai.
GLOSARIUM
Kegagalan adesif (1998): kegagalan obligasi
pada antarmuka dua bahan karena tertarik
atau bergeser

2. Apa komplikasi jangka pendek pasca

sementasi? Bagaimana cara
menghindarinya? Bagaimana
penyelesaiannya?

Karies : penyakit gigi menyebabkan

kerusakan enamel, dentin dan / atau
sementum. Etiologi Ini pada umumnya
dianggap berasal dari bakteri penghasil asam

3. Bagaimana karies akar dapat diselesaikan

dengan memuaskan?

penyesuaian oklusal : perubahan dalam

oklusi

4. Bagaimana memperbaiki retainer yang

longgar? Bagaimana FDP dihapus?

trauma oklusal : trauma periodonsium dari

fungsional atau parafungsional yang
menyebabkan kerusakan pada peralatan
periodonsium melebihi kapasitas adaptif dan
reparatif.

5. Berikan tiga contoh rencana perawatan

yang mengambil kegagalan masa depan
sebagai pertimbangan.
RINGKASAN
Perawatan pascaoperasi yang efisien adalah
mekanisme utama untuk memastikan
kesuksesan jangka panjang dalam fixed
prostodontik. Gigi yang direstorasi
memerlukan penghapusan plak lebih tekun
dan pemeliharaan daripada gigi biasa, FDP
membutuhkan perawatan tambahan dan
perhatian.
Komplikasi umum setelah selesai fase aktif
pengobatan termasuk karies, kegagalan
periodontal, kegagalan endodontik, retainer
longgar, porselen fraktur, dan fraktur. Jika
memungkinkan, dokter gigi harus
mengantisipasi prognosis dan pengobatan
jangka panjang kebutuhan pasien dan upaya
untuk merancang rencana perawatan yang
sesuai. FDP dapat dirancang sedemikian rupa
sehingga pengobatan ulang di masa
mendatang dapat diantisipasi dan
disederhanakan. Pasien harus memahami

analisis oklusi: pemeriksaan sistem

pengunyahan dengan pertimbangan khusus
untuk efek oklusi gigi pada gigi dan struktur
yang terkait
overclusure : dimensi vertikal occluding
pada jarak antar lengkung berkurang;
dimensi vertikal occluding yang
menghasilkan jarak interoklusal berlebihan
saat mandibula dalam posisi istirahat; itu
menghasilkan jarak interridge berkurang
ketika gigi berada dalam kontak
overdenture : setiap prostesis gigi yang
mencakup dan bertumpu pada satu atau lebih
gigi alami, akar gigi alami, dan / atau implan
gigi
akar : bagian dari apikal gigi yang biasanya
ditutupi oleh sementum dan melekat ke
ligament periodontal.
REFERENSI

1. Tolboe H, et al: Inuence of oral hygiene

on the mucosal conditions beneath bridge
pontics. Scand J Dent Res 95:475, 1987.
2. Tolboe H, et al: Inuence of pontic
material on alveolar mucosal conditions.
Scand J Dent Res 96:442, 1988.
3. Ericson G, et al: Cross-sectional study of
patients tted with xed partial dentures
with special ref erence to the caries
situation. Scand J Dent Res 98:8, 1990.
4. Akerboom HB, et al: Radiopacity of
posterior com- posite resins, composite
resin luting cements, and glass ionomer
lining cements. J Prosthet Dent 70:351,
1993.
5. Matsumura H, et al: Radiopacity of dental
cements. Am J Dent 6:43, 1993.
6. el-Mowafy OM, Benmergui C:
Radiopacity of resin- based inlay luting
cements. Oper Dent 19:11, 1994.
7. Gibson G: Identifying and treating
xerostomia in restorative patients. J
Esthet Dent 10:253, 1998.
8. Keene JJ Jr, et al: Antidepressant use in
psychiatry and medicine: importance in
dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 134:71,
2003.
9. Walton JN, et al: A survey of crown and
xed partial denture failures: length of
service and reasons for replacement. J
Prosthet Dent 56:416, 1986.
10. Libby G, et al: Longevity of xed partial
dentures. J Prosthet Dent 78:127, 1997.
11. Sundh B, Odman P: A study of xed
prosthodon- tics performed at a
university clinic 18 years after insertion.
Int J Prosthodont 10:513, 1997. 12. Priest
GF: Failure rates of restorations for
singletooth replacement. Int J
Prosthodont 9:38, 1996.
13. Bauer JG, et al: The reliability of
diagnosing root caries using oral
examinations. J Dent Educ 52:622, 1988.

14. Silverstone LM: Remineralization

phenomena. Caries Res 11(suppl 1):59,
1977.
15. Gordon SR: Older adults: demographics
and need for quality care. J Prosthet Dent
61:737, 1989.
16. Hellyer PH, et al: Root caries in older
people attending a general dental practice
in East Sussex. Br Dent J 169:201, 1990.
17. Guivante-Nabet C, et al: Active and
inactive caries lesions in a selected
elderly institutionalised French
population. Int Dent J 48:111, 1998.
18. Gustafsson BE, et al: The Vipeholm
dental caries study: the effect of different
levels of carbohydrate intake on caries
activity in 436 individuals observed for 5
years. Acta Odontol Scand 11:232, 1954.
19. Fure S: Five-year incidence of caries,
salivary and microbial conditions in 60-,
70- and 80- year-old Swedish
individuals. Caries Res 32:166, 1998.
20. Winn DM, et al: Coronal and root caries
in the dentition of adults in the United
States, 1988- 1991. J Dent Res 75(Spec.
No.):642, 1996.
21. Reiker J, et al: A cross-sectional study
into the prevalence of root caries in
periodontal mainte- nance patients. J Clin
Periodont 26:26, 1999.
22. Younger H, et al: Relationship among
stimulated whole, glandular salivary ow
rates, and root caries prevalence in an
elderly population: a preliminary study.
Spec Care Dentist 18:156, 1998.
23. Powell LV, et al: Factors associated with
caries inci- dence in an elderly
population. Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol 26:170, 1998.
24. Sorensen JA: A rationale for comparison
of plaque- retaining properties of crown
systems. J Prosthet Dent 62:264, 1989.

25. Alexander AG: Periodontal aspects of

conservative dentistry. Br Dent J
125:111, 1968.
26. Valderhaug J: Gingival reaction to xed
prostheses. J Dent Res 50:74, 1971.
27. Reichen-Graden S, Lang NP: Periodontal
and pulpal conditions of abutment teeth.
Status after four to eight years following
the incorporation of xed
reconstructions. Schweiz Monatsschr
Zahnmed 99:1381, 1989.
28. Wagman SS: The role of coronal contour
in gingi- val health. J Prosthet Dent
37:280, 1977.
29. Mojon P, et al: Relationship between
prosthodon- tic status, caries, and
periodontal disease in a geri- atric
population. Int J Prosthodont 8:564,
1995.
30. Rantanen T: A control study of crowns
and bridges on root canal lled teeth.
Suom Hammaslaak Toim 66:275, 1970.
31. Abou-Rass M: The stressed pulp
condition: an endodontic-restorative
diagnostic concept. J Pros- thet Dent
48:264, 1982.
32. Saunders WP, Saunders EM: Prevalence
of peri- radicular periodontitis associated
with crowned teeth in an adult Scottish
subpopulation. Br Dent J 185:137, 1998.
33. Karlsson S: A clinical evaluation of xed
bridges, 10 years following insertion. J
Oral Rehabil 13:423, 1986.
34. Eckerbom M, et al: Prevalence of apical
periodon- titis, crowned teeth and teeth
with posts in a Swedish population.
Endod Dent Traumatol 7:214, 1991.
35. Valderhaug J, et al: Assessment of the
periapical and clinical status of crowned
teeth over 25 years. J Dent 25:97, 1997.
36. Olin PS: Effect of prolonged ultrasonic
instrumen- tation on the retention of
cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent
64:563, 1990.

37. Oliva RA: Clinical evaluation of a new

crown and xed partial denture remover.
J Prosthet Dent 44:267, 1980.
38. Parreira FR, et al: Cast prosthesis
removal using ultrasonics and a
thermoplastic resin adhesive. J Endod
20:141, 1994.
39. Robbins JW: Intraoral repair of the
fractured porcelain restoration. Oper
Dent 23:203, 1998.
40. Chung KH, Hwang YC: Bonding
strengths of porcelain repair systems with
various surface treat- ments. J Prosthet
Dent 78:267, 1997.
41. Kupiec KA, et al: Evaluation of porcelain
surface treatments and agents for
composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet
Dent 76:119, 1996.
42. Pameijer CH, et al: Repairing fractured
porcelain: how surface preparation
affects shear force resist- ance. J Am
Dent Assoc 127:203, 1996.
43. Nowlin TP, et al: Evaluation of the
bonding of three porcelain repair
systems. J Prosthet Dent 46:516, 1981.
44. Gregory WA, et al: Composite resin
repair of porcelain using different
bonding materials. Oper Dent 13:114,
1988.
45. Barreto MT, Bottaro BF: A practical
approach to porcelain repair. J Prosthet
Dent 48:349, 1982.
46. Welsh SL, Schwab JT: Repair technique
for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations.
J Prosthet Dent 38:61, 1977.
47. Miller TH, Thayer KE: Intraoral repair of
xed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent
25:382, 1971.
48. Cardoso AC, Spinelli Filho P: Clinical
and labora- tory techniques for repair of
fractured porcelain in xed prostheses: a
case report. Quintessence Int 25:835,
1994.

49. Westerman RD: A new paradigm for the

con- struction and service of xed
prosthodontics. Dent Today 18:62, 1999.
50. Goodacre CJ, et al: Clinical
complications in xed prosthodontics. J
Prosthet Dent 90:31, 2003.

51. Goodacre CJ, et al: Clinical

complications with implants and implant
prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 90:121, 2003.