Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reading
By Prof. Jonathan Acua Solano
Friday, May 8, 2015
Twitter: @jonacuso
Post 168
Can a course in which students decide what they want to read from a series of
proposed books already chosen by a tutor be a better and more motivating one for them?
Can the creation of a reading community rather than a lecturing class prompt individuals
to read more and find enjoyment in their readings? For Brumfit (1986), the great value of
the [literature] course [like this] lay in establishing what might be called a reading
community, a group of individuals, whom guided by their instructor, experience literature
with their life experiences, the understanding of a theme, and comparing writers.
What Brumfit (1986) proposes is a course which is not designed to follow a set
books approach to teaching literature. Brumfit intends to develop with students an
attitude to works of literature (1986) that can help learners to better comprehend
literature and find enjoyment in the choice of books they make. What Brumfit intends to
achieve is finding a method that in the eyes of McKay (1986) focuses its importance on
the enjoyment attained [by the reader] by interacting with texts in aesthetic reading. For
Brumfit (1986), our response to literature is part of our response to history, to ethics, to
politics, to understanding what we are and what other people are.
Bruss, N. (1981), Lacan & Literature. The Massachusetts Review. Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring
1981). pp. 62-92. Retrieved on 2015, April 2, 2015 from the Jstor webpage at
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25089121
McKay, S. (1986). Literature in the ESL Classroom. Literature and Language Teaching.
Edited by Brumfit & Carter. Oxford: OUP