You are on page 1of 12

SPE-170980-MS

Subsea Well Intervention: Recent Developments and Recommendations to


Increase Overall Project Returns
M.E. Nelson, Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; P.G. McLeroy, Texas A&M University

Copyright 2014, Society of Petroleum Engineers


This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2729 October 2014.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents
of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect
any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written
consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may
not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.

Abstract
As the subsea industry ages, the number of premature subsea well shut downs are increasing due to
insufficient well intervention programs. In the past, subsea well interventions have not been widely used
because of a lack of economic feasibility; however, with appropriate project planning, the recent economic
climate, and advances in well intervention technology, a greater overall project return can be realized by
implementing a proactive well intervention program. While intervention on surface wells is a familiar
topic, the benefits and negative consequences of more recent subsea intervention developments, such as
riser-less light well intervention, riser-less mud return, and well flow back and testing, are evaluated.
These different well intervention methods carry varying amounts of risk with them, with the potential to
greatly enhance or diminish well performance and thus affect recoverable hydrocarbons. The risks
involved with the different well intervention methods are evaluated and recommendations are made as to
which methods are utilized depending on desired return rates and risk aversion levels. Recommendations
are made for implementing a successful well intervention program, such as production monitoring,
scenario planning, application of a dedicated multi-disciplinary team, cross-organizational collaboration,
and logistical improvements. With an effective well intervention program, reservoirs can be further
exploited, potentially increasing project return and supplying hydrocarbons to a demanding global market.

Introduction
Secondary Recovery Methods Integral to Initial Field Development
Employing secondary recovery methods is becoming integral to initial onshore field development in order
to achieve maximum hydrocarbon returns. Original onshore field development practices consisted of
operators exhausting primary depletion, then installing waterflood facilities and converting producers to
water injectors. This caused a protracted period of reservoirs being without pressure support, leading to
complications with shut-in wells and underutilized pipelines and facilities. An early success in changing
this approach was in the high-risk Arctic development, the Kuparuk River Field (Nelson 2007). Kuparuks
initial production began in 1981 and by the end of 1982, ninety wells were completed, 75 of them
producers. Immediately following the wells being brought online, waterflooding began in January 1983.
This increased the expected ultimate recovery from 350-600 million to 1.25-1.5 billion barrels of oil. The
project faced considerable technical challenges in waterflooding due to the cold temperatures of the North

SPE-170980-MS

Figure 1Forecast ROIP at cessation of production for 45 largest developed Neogene fields (Lach 2010, his Fig. 43).

Slope, but due to the focus placed on reservoir management rather than just field development, the
technical challenges were overcome and waterflooding helped the project surpass production levels ahead
of schedule. Similar to what was experienced in Kuparuk, secondary recovery methods made integral to
initial subsea well field development could help achieve maximum hydrocarbon production, and thus,
maximum project returns.
Remaining Reserves in Subsea Wells
A clear picture of the opportunity for improved oil returns in subsea wells is seen in a report discussing
improved oil recovery for deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) reservoirs, prepared for the Research
Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA) (Lach 2010). Per the report, for 56 major GOM
oil-producing fields that began production from 2000 to 2009, the average remaining oil in place (ROIP)
per field is 66 MMBOE. In other terms, the volume-weighted average Return Factor (RF) for major
oil-producing fields in the GOM is 28.9%. For further illustration, the forecasted ROIP for the 45 largest
Neogene / Pleistocene reservoirs in deepwater GOM is shown in Fig. 1. There is strong evidence for
improved oil recovery in subsea GOM reservoirs, in addition to improving overall project economics once
thought unachievable. Sunk project costs associated with initial development of the subsea fields are now
further covered with subsea interventions that offset production declines; capturing more reserves
ultimately. By use of a secondary recovery method through subsea well interventions, a greater return can
be achieved.
Operators Options
An operator has three fundamental options when a subsea well becomes uneconomical to produce, i.e. the
costs to recover the hydrocarbons are greater than the value of the hydrocarbons produced. One option is
to launch a subsea intervention campaign or employ a larger scale secondary recovery method in an effort
to increase the production rate of more than one uneconomic well. The second option is to shut-in or
potentially abandon the well. The third option is consideration of selling the well in a package if the
operator is opting to exit. Due to the fact that the well needs intervention work to begin flowing with more
economic efficiency no matter the owner, the selling operator would have to sell their working interest at

SPE-170980-MS

a discounted price. An economic intervention is likely the best option to produce maximum returns for the
original operator; much like performing preventive maintenance in operations to maintain value of the
assets. Since subsea well interventions come at a great cost and require extensive coordination between
multiple parties, approaching subsea well interventions proactively ensures an operator will achieve
maximum returns from their subsea well portfolio.

Overview of Subsea Well Interventions Operations


Definitions
For clarity, a few definitions are presented. A subsea well intervention (SSWI) is defined as any instance
when a physical connection is made to a completed well to alter production. SSWI Methods are the means
used to physically connect to the well. SSWI Operations are the activities performed while re-entering the
well. The purpose of the following sections is to provide the reader an overview of SSWI operations used
and the requirements placed on the most commonly used SSWI methods.
SSWI operations are implemented to alter a wells performance by either physically entering the well
to perform work or pumping fluids into the well. While there are numerous, varying types of well work
performed during interventions, for the purposes of this discussion, the main SSWI operations are
classified into the following categories, explained briefly and identified by their main requirements.
Pumping Operations
Pumping into a well is the simplest form of intervention. Production enhancement is achieved by pumping
chemicals downhole in an effort to change the production rate. This type of operation includes well
acidizing to improve fluid flow and using methanol to inhibit hydrate formation. The main requirement
for pumping operations is a connection that enables hydraulic communication.
Wellhead / Christmas Tree Maintenance Operations
A SSWI operation servicing subsea infrastructure varies greatly depending upon the condition of the
equipment being serviced and the manufacturers recommended maintenance procedures. This would
include pressure testing the surface and subsurface equipment and performing any necessary greasing.
Depending on the severity of the operation, the main requirement for this operation is hydraulic
communication.
Wireline (Slickline) Operations
A slickline is a single strand wire that enters the wellbore. The purpose of the slickline is to run tools into
the wellbore for placement or removal. Additionally, a slickline can be used to perform different tasks
including memory logging and gauge cutting (Larimore et al. 1997). The main requirement for a slickline
operation is hydraulic communication and a conduit by which the slickline may be lowered into the
wellbore.
Wireline (Braided line) Operations
A braided line is a more complex version of a slickline and is typically used for heavy fishing operations
when the slickline is not sufficiently strong enough to safely lower and raise the equipment. It may contain
insulated wires, which can be used for logging and perforating purposes. A braided line operation requires
hydraulic communication and a conduit, as well as a grease injection system to ensure that the Blowout
Preventer (BOP) can seal around the braided contours of the line. Furthermore, it requires an additional
shear-seal BOP as a tertiary boundary.
Coiled Tubing Operations
Coiled tubing is metal pipe used to carry out operations similar to wireline. It has some benefits over
wireline techniques due to the ability to pump chemicals directly to the bottom of the well through the
tubing. Likewise, coiled-tubing operations can be used for circulation, logging, drilling and production

SPE-170980-MS

operations. In a subsea environment, coiled tubing requires a hydraulic connection to a mobile drilling unit
as well as a rigid conduit through which it can reach the wellbore.
Snubbing Operations
Snubbing, also known as a hydraulic workover, can be performed in live wells. It involves running a
bottom hole assembly (BHA) on a drill string against wellbore pressure to perform the desired tasks, such
as fishing or milling (Ford et al. 2011). Snubbing is advantageous over other live well intervention
methods due to its small footprint on the rig, ability to reach great depths, and rigidity to apply high weight
on bit. Modern snubbing units require complicated hydraulic systems and a rigid conduit to the well.
Tubing Retrieval Operations
Tubing retrieval refers to pulling and replacing the tubing hanger and production tubing usually due to
performance deterioration. It is an expensive operation due to the complexity of the procedure. Typically
tubing retrieval is performed on older wells or if the well integrity is severely threatened or due to
changing reservoir conditions which require a new completion. The main requirement for tubing retrieval
is full wellbore access.

Overview of Subsea Well Interventions Methods


SSWI Method: Blowout Preventer (BOP)
One form of attaching to a well for a SSWI is by using a Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) equipped
with a full bore drilling riser and BOP, attaching to a subsea Christmas Tree (XT) to gain well access.
BOPs maintain well control during the intervention, containing high wellbore pressures and formation
kicks. BOPs are used throughout drilling and completion operations, thus operators and drilling contractors have the greatest familiarity with this SSWI method. The main advantage of using a BOP as an
intervention method is full-bore access to the well; however, this comes at a great cost. Day rates of
deepwater MODUs can be in excess of $1MM USD/day. Pulling the subsea BOP due to performance
issues is a risky and costly operation, requiring several days, if not weeks, depending on the performance
issue and because the well needs to be plugged, requiring the mud column to be evacuated out of the riser.
SSWI Method: Completion / Workover Riser System
Completion / workover riser systems are very similar in function to the BOP SSWI method. They contain
equipment used to maintain well control and emergency disconnect systems; however, they utilize a
smaller riser system, supplying a conduit to the well that is smaller than the full wellbore. The use of small
bore BOPs increases this methods well control reliability. This method is most ideally deployed on an
intervention vessel, typically demanding smaller operating expenses than full-size MODUs (Kharuna et
al. 2003).
Because Marine risers create a direct link between a vessel and the wellhead for intervention, they can
be used for a variety of SSWI operations using coiled tubing and wireline intervention. Coiled tubing is
a favored intervention method that allows for mud circulation and chemical injection, making a riser
system very valuable for such operations. However, the riser system can be cost prohibitive when
performing wireline and e-line tasks, which can be achieved at a smaller cost using riserless interventions.
The deeper the riser is placed, the greater risk of failure due to the increased loads placed on the hoisting
equipment and greater stress levels on the riser. Also, vessel motion results in cyclic top tension on the
riser, which is increased as the size of the riser increases (Ambrose et al 2001).
Ultimately, the costs and risks associated with using the completion / workover riser method is related
to the specific vessel chosen for operations; using small vessels equipped with a completion / workover
riser system in deepwater environments can be unreliable and using a larger vessel can be on the same
level of cost as a MODU equipped with a full bore BOP. Risk may be mitigated with the implementation
of improved riser design, using with materials lighter than steel, thus reducing cyclical fatigue issues.

SPE-170980-MS

SSWI Method: Riserless Light Well Intervention (RLWI)


Riserless light well intervention consists of utilizing a monohull vessel and various intervention packages
depending on the intervention operation being performed. The variety of operations is extensive,
including, but not limited to, running e-line to gather data, re-perforating the well, installing plugs for
zonal isolation, tubing and casing leak detection, hardware inspection, well-killing operations, pumping
operations, and the change-out and repair of subsea XTs. (Fjaertoft et al. 2011)
The costs of this intervention method are greatly reduced, sometimes by more than 50%, because
intervention work is performed by smaller vessels as opposed to larger, more expensive MODUs or
intervention vessels. RLWI vessels have been successful in shallow regions, such as the North Sea, but
have operational limitations in ultra deepwater (5000 ft.) (BSEE 2008). RLWI methods typically have
reduced environmental impact compared to larger SSWI methods. They are generally considered a safer
intervention method because any fire or explosion threat is significantly reduced as hydrocarbons are not
returned to the vessel during operation. RLWI induces lighter mechanical loading on the wellhead and XT
than BOPs or completion / workover packages by using lightweight intervention packages.
While the small size of the vessels used in RLWI provides a multitude of advantages, it also limits their
operational functionality. Operational delays due to uncontrollable factors such as weather can be costly
to a SSWI campaign. A significant disadvantage this method is that it lacks rigid conduit to the wellbore,
thus eliminating its use from intervention operations such as snubbing and tubing retrieval.
As a relatively new intervention method compared to those previously mentioned, the oil and gas
industry still has a lot to learn about the full limitations of RLWI. With regards to deepwater drilling, the
RWLI method can still be improved with respect to productivity, sensitivity to weather phenomena, and
deepwater compatibility. A specific area for improvement in RLWI would be the development of stronger
wireline cables, increasing the ability to deploy larger intervention equipment packages (Munkerud et al.
2007). RLWI vessels have been used successfully in wells around the world, generating industry wide
interest in the potential cost saving associated with method. As this intervention method matures,
experience and technology gaps will be filled, improving the reliability of RLWI.

SSWI Method and Operation Compatibility


The compatibility of specific SSWI method and operation combinations depend on the technical
requirements of the operation and the cost effectiveness of the method. In determining basic compatibility,
the following method and operational characteristics were taken into consideration:

Drilling vessels demand the highest day-rates of the SSWI methods, therefore are reserved when
full bore access is required.
The completion / workover riser method is most suitable for coiled tubing operations when a rigid
conduit is required, however, it is typically a more expensive and complex operation than wireline.
RLWI vessels are cable of pumping, wireline, flow back, XT retrieval/installation operations; and,
RLWI is the most cost efficient method of the wireline operations.
Technical challenges prevent RLWI vessels from performing coiled tubing operations. Research
and development efforts are underway to enable the use of coiled tubing without the use of a riser
system.
Each method and operation combination is designated a compatibility level in Fig. 2. Green
indicates that the method and operation are technically compatible and cost-effective. Red
indicates that either using a method with a specific operation would be too cost prohibitive or not
technically feasible. Yellow indicates that the operation could be performed using this method, but
that there are currently more cost-effective or safer alternatives.

SPE-170980-MS

Figure 2While some SSWI methods and operations are compatible, not all are economically advisable.

Proactive Approach: Focus on New Technologies


As with most new technologies, the associated risks initially reside with a lack of field experience. With
more field applications with SSWI specific technologies, the costs associated with the risks in using
infant technologies will reduce.
The BOP SSWI method has the lowest risks associated with technological familiarity because the
equipment is used every day for drilling and completion work; however, this method comes at the highest
cost due to the size and capabilities required of the vessels used to employ it (Fjaertoft 2011).
The completion / workover riser method is more established than RLWI methods. The main risks using
this method are a result from the high pressure, small bore riser used. The riser is exposed to very high
stress levels, potentially leading to costly failures. Minimizing the risers weight would have significant
benefits, including the reduction of dynamic stress issues. Using lighter riser would allow the use of
smaller vessels as possible impact on vessel motion would decrease, which would decrease operational
costs and increase the ability to run operations at greater depths. (Ambrose et al. 2001).
RLWI has less field experience, so the risks associated with the lack of technical familiarity can be
viewed as greater than that for the BOP or completion / workover riser system. To its advantage,
operations performed by RWLI methods have proven to be much more cost effective than both BOP on
XT and completion / workover riser interventions. RLWI is the most cost effective method for wireline
operations, increasing in efficiency as stronger wirelines are developed (Munkerud et al. 2007). The
development of stronger subsea cables would increase the possible size of intervention packages and the
ability for RWLI vessels to operate in harsher, deeper subseas. Developments in operational technology
could lead to the ability for coil tubing to be deployed from monohull vessels used in RLWI methods,
reducing the cost of coil tubing operations traditionally performed from a MODU or by completion /
workover riser systems. Weather continues to be a significant challenge for the smaller vessels used in
RLWI. To mitigate this cost, strategic planning of interventions to occur during calmer weather seasons
could be cost effective.

Reactive Approach: Missed Opportunities


Risk analysis and decision making is an integral part of major subsea projects. Before widespread
adaptation of the practice along with stage-gated project management, most problems in the field were
tackled as situations arose. Given the time and costs associated with situational analysis, more methodical
decision analysis was incorporated into major capital projects. Today, the common practice is to prepare

SPE-170980-MS

Figure 3Case 1 SSWI with follow-on increase in hydrocarbon production. (McGennis 2008, his Fig. 7)

Figure 4 Case 2 SSWI with follow-on production increases. (McGennis 2008, his Fig. 10)

contingencies, rehearse emergency plans, and schedule operational staff for round the clock coverage to
address problems that might arise in the high cost environment of subsea development and production.
Similar proactive decision and risk analysis applied to SSWIs would enable increased intervention
reaction time, thus improving projects returns.
For example, results from SSWI campaigns from 2002 to 2007 are charted in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, referred
to as Case 1 and Case 2 (McGennis et al. 2008). These case studies were taken from subsea wells located
in the United Kingdom sector of the North Sea, where the average water depth is approximately 300 ft.
(European Observation Network Territorial Development and Cohesion 2013). The interventions were
performed with a light well intervention vessel, having an average intervention operation time of 8.5 days.
In Case 1, the cumulative recovered oil from the SSWI was approximately 720,000 bbls. With an
average crude price of $58/bbl from July 2004 to June 2005, the additional recovered oil from Case 1 is
valued at approximately $41.5MM. (Visual 2012) The reaction time from the well collapsing to the
intervention going online was six months. Using a conservative rate of return of 3.5% in a simple Time
Value of Money (TVM) calculation, if the well were intervened in two months, one-third of the time, a
savings of $487k would be realized.
In Case 2, the cumulative recovered oil was approximately 345,000 bbls. With an average crude price
of approximately $71/bbl from September 2006 to September 2007, the additional recovered oil from
Case 2 is valued at approximately $24.6MM USD. Using a conservative rate of return of 3.5% in a simple
TVM calculation, if the well were intervened in one- third of the time, a savings of $484k would be
realized.
At first, the savings made by improving the response time of the interventions in Case 1 and Case 2
might not seem substantial; however, these improvements in production are seen on wells much different

SPE-170980-MS

Figure 5Project economics are greatly affected by lengthy reaction times.

than modern deepwater wells. Production rates in deepwater subsea wells are orders of magnitude higher
and their SSWI intervention reaction times are much longer. The savings realized from a similar reduction
in intervention reaction time would be much more substantial on major deepwater subsea well interventions.

Proactive Approach: Intervention Planning Team


The financial analysis indicates that a delay in SSWIs, defined as the time between the identification of
the problem (unexpected or undesired change in production levels) and the implementation of the solution
(physically entering the well) can be costly, potentially leading to a situation where an intervention would
no longer be economically feasible. The execution of a SSWI can be broken into three general stages,
illustrated in Fig. 5.
Recognizing the Problem
Recognizing that theres a drop in production levels is not a simple task. Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 highlight
production rates can be erratic; therefore, an algorithm, such as a Kalman filter, helps to identify a trend.
This could take considerable time before the downward trend is recognized, so the more data monitored
and processed, the more likely time could be reduced. Determining what data should be gathered
downhole and on the XT is decided early in a subsea development project; so, planning for an intervention
at the early stage of a project and building in the necessary production monitoring equipment is vital to
reducing the time it takes to realize there is a problem in the well.
Developing a Solution
Once the problem is recognized, a team of the necessary disciplines must be assembled to brainstorm
solutions, risk assess options, and follow through with the necessary analysis. The creation of such a team
takes time due to various commitments and competing projects. Once the team is created, a plan is devised
and vetted, and readied for deployment. This part of the overall three-staged process can take months,
further delaying production improvements and potentially affecting project economics.
Deploying the Solution
The necessary operational support, personnel, equipment, and materials, has been identified when the
solution was developed. Now logistical problems can arise. Manufacturers have considerable lead times,
vessels could be tied up with other work, additional personnel might needed, organizational funding and
support are required - all of these factors can further delay an operator from deploying a SSWI campaign
if an operator has not adequately planned and built SSWI costs into their standard operations.
Facing Ambiguity: Managing a Well Intervention Portfolio
The ability of an organization to function in ambiguity is necessary to succeed in fields that contain a great
deal of unknowns, such as subsea well interventions. Scenario planning, a process that identifies plausible,
not probable, future scenarios in an effort to improve organizational flexibility has been in use at large

SPE-170980-MS

Figure 6 Adapted from Aihevba (2004), using a closed loop process would enhance intervention effectiveness and execution.

organizations, such as Royal Dutch Shell, since the 1970s (Wilkinson 2013). These efforts have created
direct economic value when evaluating specific scenarios and have given Industry a greater ability to
recognize, decipher, and react to change. Similarly, creating a multidisciplinary team dedicated to subsea
well intervention scenario planning could increase an operators response time and thus economic gain in
subsea wells. A team consisting of all interested parties- reservoir, completions, operations - could be
continuously developing what if scenarios for SSWIs for an operators portfolio. By continuously
analyzing production rates, reservoir conditions, qualities of the producing hydrocarbons, ability to
mobilize equipment, a dedicated SSWI team could enhance an operators ability to reduce ROIP through
effective intervention operations.
After experiencing a rapid decline in oil production in Oman fields, the Northern Oil Directorate of
Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) increased its well intervention activity aggressively, doubling well
intervention expenditures in a period of 4 years. The Well Services division of PDO managed this increase
in well intervention activity through several project management approaches, including the Intervention
and Life Cycle and Feedback loop shown in Fig. 6. This is similar to closed loop processes widely used
throughout the oil and gas industry, commonly referred to as Lessons Learned of After Action
Reviews. By employing similar methodologies, a SSWI planning team could improve an operators
SSWI portfolio, successfully predicting the need for and properly executing SSWIs. (Aihevba 2004)

SSWI Recommendations Best Practices


Across Organization Collaboration
When exploring a new technological frontier, as the oil and gas industry is with SSWI, it is vital to
collaborate with other invested organizations to ensure mutual success. Lasting partnerships between
operators and contractors may provide benefits for both parties while sharing rewards and mitigating risks
if they are founded on shared trust and cooperation. Such partnerships could guarantee a greater common
knowledge of risk associated with a project and ease misalignment of interest, which increases the
decisions available to mitigate risks effectively. Common issues leading to an increase in risk include a
lack of communication and information, resulting in a lack of common goals and an unhealthy relationship
between business partners. The planning stages of a project are crucial, and when contractors are involved,
often they can provide technical advice based on experience, which mitigate risks and decrease costs for
the operator while helping to develop stronger relationships. During planning, important project data and
documents should be shared between the operator and contractor in order to make specific information
available to both parties (Imana et al. 1996). In addition to relationships between industry partners, there

10

SPE-170980-MS

have been joint efforts between academia and industry throughout the United States to collaborate on
research in order to achieve goals as evidenced by the RPSEA and DOE partnership in 2005 to improve
deepwater production, technology, and cost effectiveness and to meet high level industry needs (Schroeder et al. 2009).
Improving Logistics
While there has been extensive discussion about potential improvements to SSWI execution, logistical
successes between business partners have been previously experienced. One such case study reviews how
a SSWI campaign was performed successfully by a RWLI vessel on seven wells from December 2011 to
March 2012 off the coast of Equatorial Guinea (Bosworth et al. 2013). The operation was planned from
Houston, the vessel contractor was located in Aberdeen, UK, and the vessel was mobilized to operate in
West African waters; therefore, effective project management and efficient logistical execution was vital.
Planning started 6 months before the operation mobilized and the project engineers worked with the client
at their corporate office in Houston. During the planning period, weekly conference calls were held
between Houston, Aberdeen, and Malabo in order to keep all parties updated and resolve any challenges.
Project engineers had to organize and communicate aspects of the operation and maintain constant
communication with all parties in order to finalize the execution plan, mitigate potential risks, and update
equipment status. Also, several requirements were reviewed to ensure employees had necessary paperwork and vaccinations for working in West Africa, while communication with official shipping agents
allowed for customs clearance for the vessel and equipment to be completed without any setbacks.
The SSWI campaign took 66 days while the total transit time of the vessel from the UK to Africa and
back took just 39 days, stressing that the logistical flexibility of RWLI, without need for standby vessels
and reduced helicopter flights, allowed for the operations to be performed more efficiently and cost
effectively than if other methods were used. This case study highlights how effective project management
and improved logistics between business partners throughout the planning stages is crucial to determining
the success of RLWI during the operational stage.

Conclusions
To attain the great financial rewards from improving the recovery of hydrocarbons from subsea fields,
efforts should be focused not only on well development, but improving reservoir performance. Subsea
well interventions are a key method to offsetting production declines and potentially improving hydrocarbon recovery. However, proactive efforts are needed to improve the relevant technologies and
execution strategies. Investment needs to be made in improving existing SSWI technologies, filling
technological voids that exist in the more affordable intervention methods. Methodical SSWI decision and
risk analysis aligned with stage-gated project management from the initial stages will enable organizations
to respond when unexpected production problems arise. This includes dedicating skilled personnel, to
continuously evaluate well performance and the ability of an organization to counter declining production.
Operators can no longer approach subsea well interventions in a reactive manner if maximum returns are
to be gained from the ever increasing number of aging subsea wells.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the intensive efforts by Gojko Matovic in assisting with the
research presented in this paper and to the Texas A&M Harold Vance Department of Petroleum
Engineering for providing research support. A specific acknowledgement goes to Professor Priscilla G.
McLeroy in recognition of her guidance in shaping and refining the direction and purpose of the paper and
invaluable contributions. The author would also like to give a special acknowledgment to David L.
ODonnell for his personal and professional mentorship throughout the authors career.
The authors would also like to acknowledge the efforts of the individuals and teams conducting oil and

SPE-170980-MS

11

gas operations, plus drilling contractors, service providers, equipment manufacturers, academic institutions, and others who have made individual and collaborative efforts to advance subsea well intervention
technology and execution. This is a new and challenging frontier and continued efforts to work together
as an industry will enable meeting the worlds energy needs for generations to come.
Nomenclature
BHA
Bottom hole Assembly
BOP
Blowout Preventer
DOE
United States Department of Energy
GOM
Gulf of Mexico
MM
Million
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit
PDO
Petroleum Development Oman
RF
Recovery Factor
RLWI
Riserless Well Intervention
ROIP
Remaining Oil in Place
RPSEA Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America
SSWI
Subsea Well Intervention
TVM
Time Value of Money
USD
United Stated Dollars
XT
Christmas Tree

References
Aihevba, L. O. 2004. Well Intervention Management in Oman Fields. Paper SPE 88025 presented at
the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
13-15 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88025-MS
Ambrose, B. D., Childs, M. S., Leppard, S. A. and Krohn, R. L. 2001. Application of a Deepwater
Riser Risk Analysis to Drilling Operations and Riser Design. Paper OTC 12954 presented at the 2003
Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 30 April-3 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/12954-MS
Bosworth, P. and Willis, O. 2013. Rigless Intervention: Case Studies, UK and Africa. Paper OTC
24065 presented at the 2013 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 6-9 May. http://
dx.doi.org/10.4043/24065-MS Doi: 10.4043/24065-MS
BSEE. 2008. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico 2008: Americas Offshore Energy Future. http://
www.bsee.gov/Exploration-and-Production/Development-and-Production/Gulf/2008-013-pdf (downloaded 28 June 2014).
European Observation Network Territorial Development and Cohesion. 2013. North Sea Regional
Profile. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/ESaTDOR/
FR_160413/20130417_annexes/ESaTDOR_FR_Annex_7_North_Sea_Profile.pdf (downloaded 28 June
2014).
Fjaertoft, L. and Sonstabo, G. 2011 Success From Subsea Riserless Well Interventions. Paper SPE
143296 presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition,
The Woodlands, Texas, 5-6 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143296-MS.
Ford, J. D., McDaniel, R., and Barbee, G. 2011. HWO/Snubbing Unit used Effectively for Subsea
Flowline Fishing and Cleanout at Nansen Spar. Paper SPE 143248 presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled
Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 5-6 April. http://
dx.doi.org/10.2118/143248-MS

12

SPE-170980-MS

Imana, J. L., Podowski, J., and Stegemeier, D. 1996. Strategic Alliances: Managing Risks, Sharing
Rewards. Paper SPE 36117 presented at the 1996 Petroleum Engineering Conference, Trinidad, 23-26
April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36117-MS
Khurana, S., DeWalt, B. and Headworth, C. 2003. Well Intervention Using Rig less Techniques. Paper
OTC 15177 presented at the 2003 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 5-8 May. http://
dx.doi.org/10.4043/15177-MS
Lach, J. 2010. Improved Recovery: Phase I 0721-1701. IOR for Deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Final
Report to RPSEA, Knowledge Reservoir, LLC, Houston, TX (December 2010).
Larimore, D. R. and Fehrmann, G. Z. 1997. Field Cases of Cost Efficient Slickline Well Interventions.
Paper OTC 8530 presented at the 1997 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 5-8 May.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/8530-MS
McGennis, E. M. 2008. Subsea Production EnhancementSuccess and Failure Over 5 Years. Paper
SPE 112161 presented at the 2008 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Orlando, Florida, 4-6 March.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112161-MS
Munkerud P.K and Indreberg O. 2007. Riserless Light Well Interventions (RLWI). Paper OTC 18746
presented at the 2007 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 30 April 3 May. http://
dx.doi.org/10.4043/18746-MS
Nelson, K. 2007. KUPARUK ANNIVERSARY: Early 1980s: Kuparuk build continues, http://
www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/226216476.shtml (accessed 26 June 2014)
Schroeder, A. J., Haver, C. A. and Chitwood, J. E. 2009. RPSEA: Ultradeepwater Program. Paper
OTC 20309 presented at the 2009 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 4-7 May. http://
dx.doi.org/10.4043/20309-MS
Visual Data, Inc. 2012. MacroTrends Crude Oil Price History Chart, http://www.macrotrends.net/
1369/crude-oil-price-history-chart (accessed 23 June 2014).
Wilkinson, A. 2013. Living in the Futures, http://hbr.org/2013/05/living-in-the-futures/ (accessed 23
June 2014)

You might also like